Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2024;25(11):4051–4059. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.11.4051

Targeted Sequencing of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Mutations Revealed a Potential Association between PIK3CA and Trastuzumab Resistance

Asmaa Mohamed Mekhamer 1, Marwa Hanafi Saied 1,*, Dalia Abd Elmoaty Elneily 1, Tarek Abdel Halim El-Fayoumi 2, Doaa Ibrahim Hashad 1
PMCID: PMC11996105  PMID: 39611930

Abstract

Background:

Different molecular subtypes, including HER2-positive, have been identified in breast cancer. The overexpression of HER2 triggers downstream signaling pathways such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Until recently, trastuzumab has been used as a single HER2-targeted therapy in Egypt. However, resistance to trastuzumab has been reported. Previous studies have demonstrated the genetic variants that affect the trastuzumab response. However in Egypt, few studies investigated molecular biomarkers such as p53 that might affect the trastuzumab response. Therefore, we aimed to extend the genetics workup of Her2 + BC to include important oncogenes and other vital cancer pathways.

Methods:

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were collected from 24 HER2+ BC Egyptian patients, twelve patients in complete remission for 2 years or more from the start of trastuzumab and twelve resistant patients who relapsed or developed metastasis within 2 years from the start of trastuzumab. Somatic mutations in hotspot regions of 17 genes were further investigated using next-generation sequencing.

Results:

Among the total number of identified variants (106 variants), PIK3CA showed the most frequent variants, with more variants occurring in the resistant group than in the responsive group (P= 0.004). The frequency of PIK3CA mutations was greater in resistant patients than in responsive patients (P= 0.036). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between PIK3CA mutations and pathological complete response (pCR) (P=0.036). Most of PIK3CA variants in resistant patients were detected in exon 9 and 20. The PIK3CA variants His1047Tyr, Glu545Lys, His701Pro, Lys111Glu, Val344Gly and Tyr1021Cys were found only in the resistant patients, suggesting that they are associated with trastuzumab resistance.

Conclusion:

PIK3CA variants were more frequent in resistant HER2+ BC patients than in responsive patients, with a significant correlation between PIK3CA mutation and a lower pCR rate. PIK3CA variants within exon 9 and 20 (such as Glu545Lys and His1047Tyr respectively) were associated with trastuzumab resistance.

Key Words: PIK3CA, HER2-targeted therapy, NGS, genetic variants, trastuzumab resistance

Introduction

HER2 overexpression occurs in around 20% of breast cancer (BC) cases [1]. Patients diagnosed with HER2+ BC exhibit an aggressive phenotype, early metastasis and chemoresistance [2]. It is thought that amplification of the HER2 gene is associated with the proliferation and progression of certain aggressive breast cells. This effect results from signal transduction mediated by the activation of the PI3K/AKT, Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK or other pathways, causing adverse biological characteristics, tumorigenesis and cancer spread [3, 4].

Advances in HER2-targeted therapies have improved outcomes in HER2+ BC such as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment and also in patients with metastatic disease [4-6]. There are many FDA-approved HER2-targeted therapies, e.g., trastuzumab, pertuzumab and lapatinib. Trastuzumab is the first FDA-approved HER2-targeted therapy for HER2+ BC [7]. Until the end of 2022, trastuzumab was used alone as a monoclonal antibody both as an adjuvant and neoadjuvant agent for stage 2 and stage 3 HER2+ BC patients. However, resistance to trastuzumab occurs in approximately 60–80% of patients when it is used as a single therapy or in 20–50% of patients when it is combined with chemotherapy [8].

The mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab is multifactorial [9] Accordingly, distinct genetic alterations associated with trastuzumab resistance, such as mutations in Akt, PDK, PTEN, TP53, ATM, STK11, and RB1, were investigated [10]. Many previous studies have been conducted to clarify the association between gene encoding phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit p110α (PIK3CA) and trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ BC patients [11-19].

To date, there are no reliable predictive markers for the response to HER2-targeted therapy worldwide and in Egypt [20]. Therefore, it is crucial to identify potential biomarkers to predict patients who may be responsive or resistant to HER2-targeted therapy to improve therapeutic effectiveness and avoid adverse drug [1, 21].

Next-generation sequencing allows simultaneous parallel sequencing of multiple genes. Targeted sequencing can be used to investigate hotspot mutations associated with cancer drivers in BC [22, 23]. Subsequently, this allows the identification of mutations that influence response to HER2 targeted therapies and increasing the knowledge to the development of therapies targeting special genetic alterations towards personalized medicine [24].

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 24 HER2+ BC female patients older than 18 years who received trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy with no metastasis at initial time of diagnosis. Patients with metastasis at the time of diagnosis were excluded. The aim of this study was to detect somatic mutations that might be associated with the response of HER2 targeted therapy (trastuzumab) using NGS in HER2+ BC patients. Ethical approval was obtained from the Alexandria Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine. Patients were recruited from the Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department at Alexandria Main University Hospital from December 2020 to September 2021. The drug protocol involved administering trastuzumab as a neoadjuvant agent for one month before surgery and continuing after surgery for one year. According to the response to trastuzumab, the twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: 12 patients in complete remission for 2 years or more from the start of trastuzumab treatment and 12 disease-resistant patients who relapsed or developed metastasis within 2 years from the start of trastuzumab treatment. HER-2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

DNA extraction

Twenty four formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were collected. DNA was then extracted from FFPE tissue samples using a QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The concentration of DNA was determined by a Qubit™ 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Then, the extracted DNA was subjected to the following steps; DNA library preparation, clonal amplification, chip loading, sequencing and finally data Analysis.

Library preparation

Manual library preparations were conducted using an Ion AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v.2, Ion Xpress barcoded adapters and an Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The panel consisted of approximately 800 COSMIC mutations from hotspot regions of 17 genes. The genes included in this study were PIK3CA, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, CSF1R, PTPN11, PTEN, AKT1, SRC, ABL1, MPL, NOTCH1, JAK2, JAK3, CTNNB1 and APC.

Multiplex PCR was performed using 10 ng of genomic DNA with a premixed primer pool and Ion AmpliSeq HiFi master mix using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Two microliters of FuPa reagent was added to the amplicons to partially digest the primer sequences and phosphorylate the amplicons. The ligation of barcode adaptors to the amplicons was performed using an Ion Xpress™ Barcode Adapters Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The adapter ligated amplicons (library) were purified using Agencourt™ AMPure™ XP Reagent (Beckman Coulter, USA). The quantification of the libraries was performed using an Ion Library TaqMan™ Quantitation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) on an Applied Biosystems® 7500 Real Time PCR System, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the results were normalized to ~100 pM and then combined to form one library pool.

Clonal Amplification and chip loading

The clonal amplification of the barcoded DNA library onto ion sphere particles was performed on the Ion OneTouch™ 2 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using the Ion 520™ and Ion 530™ Kit OT2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The enrichment of ISPs was performed using the Ion OneTouch™ ES instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The enriched, template-positive ISPs were then loaded on an Ion 520™ Chip (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and sequenced using an Ion S5™ next generation sequencing system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Bioinformatic analysis

Torrent Suite™ Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to plan and monitor sequencing runs, view sequencer activity, analyze barcode reads, align reads to the hg19 reference genome and generate run metrics to determine the quality of the run. The samples were evaluated for genomic alterations, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and, insertions and deletions, using Ion Reporter™ Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). All genetic variants with a minimum depth of coverage of 30× were included in the study. The allelic frequency ranged from 1 to 10. The basic parameters of analysis included a minimum quality alignment threshold of 20 (corresponding to a 1% error rate) and a minimum sequencing depth of 300.

Results

The age of the patients ranged from 35 to 61 years. The histopathological subtype of BC in all patients was infiltrating ductal carcinoma. The demographic and clinicopathological data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinicopathological Data of Both Studied Groups

Response to trastuzumab
Baseline characteristics Responsive Resistant p
(n = 12) (n = 12)
Age (years) 49.42 ± 9.35 50.17 ± 8.31 0.837
Family history 1 (8.3%) 2 (16.7%) FEp =1.000
Menstrual history
Menopausal 7 (58.3%) 8 (66.7%) FEp =1.000
Menstruating 5 (41.7%) 4 (33.3%)
Parity
Nullipara 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%) MCp= 0.221
Unipara 2 (16.7%) 0 (0%)
Multipara 9 (75%) 12 (100%)
Oral Contraceptive Pills 6 (50%) 7 (58.3%) 0.682
Hormone receptor status
ER-,PR +,HER2+ 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%) MCp= 0.521
ER-,PR-,HER2+ 6 (50%) 8 (66.7%)
ER+,PR-,HER2+ 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%)
ER+,PR+,HER2+ 5 (41.7%) 3 (25%)
TNM Stage
I 2 (16.6%) 0 (0%) MCp= 0.365
II 6 (50%) 5 (41.6%)
III 4 (33.3%) 7 (58.4%)
IV 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Grade
Grade I 0 (0%) 0 (0%) MCp= 1.000
Grade II 5 (41.7%) 6 (50%)
Grade II/III 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%)
Grade III 6 (50%) 6 (50%)
Type of relapse or metastasis
Free 12 (100%) 0 (0%) MCp= 0.001*
Local deposits 0 (0%) 4 (33.3%)
Bone deposits 0 (0%) 4 (33.3%)
Brain deposites 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%)
Left side recurrence 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%)
Pulmonary deposits 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%)
Brain - pulmonary deposits 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%)
Lines of treatment
HER2 Targeted Therapy (Trastuzumab) 12 (100%) 12 (100%) 1
Chemotherapy (Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide, Taxol, and/or Taxotere) 12 (100%) 12 (100%) 1
Hormonal Therapy (Tamoxifen) 6 (50%) 4 (33.3%) 0.68

MC, Monte Carlo; FE, Fisher’s exact; p, p value for comparison between responsive and resistant groups

Sequencing of patient samples revealed a total of 106 genetic variants in the two groups: 50 variants in the responsive group and 56 variants in the resistant group. The most frequently observed variants were detected in PIK3CA (29.2%), followed by PTEN (21.7%) and KRAS (16%). Figure 1 Comparison of the distribution of PIK3CA variants between the two studied groups revealed a statistically significant difference (chi-square test, P= 0.004); PIK3CA variants were more frequent in the resistant group (23 variants) than in the responsive group (8 variants). Table S1, Figures S1 & S2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pie Chart Showing the Distribution of the Studied Genes Variants (n =106) in the 24 Patients.

The most prevalent affected genes were the PIK3CA, PTEN and KRAS genes in the two studied groups (58.33%, 50% and 50%, respectively). Figure (2) Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the two studied groups regarding the prevalence of PIK3CA mutations, which were more frequent in the resistant group than in the responsive group (Fisher’s exact test, P= 0.036). Table S2

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The Mutational Frequency of the Studied Genes in the 2 Studied Groups (n = 24)

However, PTPN11, AKT1, MPL, NOTCH1, JAK2 and CTNNB1 did not show any identified mutations in the 2 studied groups.

Pathogenic variants possibly related to HER2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab) resistance: (Table 2)

A comparison of the identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants between the 2 studied groups revealed 14 variants that were detected only in the resistant group. These 14 variants were identified in PIK3CA (6 variants), PTEN (3 variants), KRAS (1 variant), BRAF (2 variants), HRAS (1 variant) and JAK3 (1 variant) Table 2.

Table 2.

Pathogenic Variants Possibly Related to Trastuzumab Resistance

Gene Case No. Exon No. Type of mutation Variant Heterogeneity Inheritance SIFT Provean Amino acid substitution Disease Reference
PIK3CA 1 14 SNV c.2102A>C Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.His701Pro Breast neoplasm rs121913282
PIK3CA 2 2 SNV c.331A>G Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Lys111Glu Breast neoplasm rs1057519933
PIK3CA 4, 8, 12 9 SNV c.1633G>A Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Glu545Lys Breast adenocarcinoma rs104886003
PIK3CA 6 5 SNV c.1031T>G Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Val344Gly Breast neoplasm rs1057519941
PIK3CA 6, 10, 11 20 SNV c.3139C>T Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.His1047Tyr ​ Breast neoplasm rs121913281
PIK3CA 12 20 SNV c.3062A>G Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Tyr1021Cys Breast neoplasm rs121913288
PTEN 3, 6, 10, 11, 12 1 Deletion c.50_51del Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Gln17fs Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome rs587781912
PTEN 10 5 Deletion c.315del Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Cys105fs Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome rs1114167626
PTEN 12 5 SNV c.389G>A Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Arg130Gln Breast neoplasm rs121909229
KRAS 3, 6,10,12 4 SNV c.437C>T Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Ala146Val Neoplasm of the large intestine rs1057519725
JAK3 4 4 SNV c.394C>A Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Pro132Thr acute Lymphoblastic leukemia rs3212723
BRAF 3 15 SNV c.1761C>G Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Asp587Glu Neoplasm rs121913336
BRAF 11 15 SNV c.1799T>A Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Val600Glu Melanoma rs113488022
HRAS 3 2 SNV c.38G>T Het Somatic Damaging Damaging p.Gly13Val Breast neoplasm rs104894226

The six PIK3CA variants (His1047Ty, Glu545Lys, His701Pro, Lys111Glu, Val344Gly and Tyr1021Cys) were all missense mutations. Two PIK3CA variants found in 2 regions in helical domain (Glu545Lys; exon 9) and catalytic domain (His1047Tyr; exon 20). These hot-spot mutations were known to induce a gain of function in PIK3CA and previously mentioned to be associated with HER2 targeted therapy resistance and poor survival [15-19]. The PIK3CA pathogenic variant Glu545Lys was identified in 3 patients with IDs 4, 8 and 12. Furthermore, the pathogenic variant His1047Tyr was detected in 3 patients with IDs 6, 10 and 11. The other exon 20 variant (Tyr1021Cys) was identified in patient ID 12. The remaining 3 PIK3CA variants, His701Pro, Lys111Glu and Val344Gly, were detected in exons 14, 2 and 5, respectively (in patients with IDs 1, 2 and 6, respectively) Table 2.

Additionally, three PTEN variants were identified only in the resistant group. PTEN Gln17fs is a frameshift variant in exon 1 and was identified in five patients with IDs 3, 6, 10, 11 and 12. The other two PTEN variants were in exon 5: a frameshift variant, Cys105fs, was identified in patient ID 10, and a missense variant, Arg130Gln, was identified in patient ID 12, Table 2.

Moreover, one missense KRAS variant (Ala146Val) was found in exon 4 in four patients (IDs 3, 6, 10 and 12). Additionally, two missense pathogenic BRAF variants (Asp587Glu and Val600Glu) were detected in exon 15 in patients 3 and 11, respectively. The JAK3 p.Pro132Thr variant was found in exon 4 of patient ID 4. Finally, the pathogenic variant HRAS p.Gly13Val was detected in patient ID 3 in exon 2, Table 2.

Analysis of resistant patients who had more than one pathogenic variant mutation revealed early metastasis. Resistant patient ID 3 was a 36-year-old female who was diagnosed with stage IIIA and grade II HER2-enriched breast cancer. This patient had a positive family history of BC. After radical mastectomy, she received chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Even so, she developed metastatic brain deposits after the first year of treatment. Her genetic analysis revealed 4 of these pathogenic variants: the KRAS variant p.Ala146Val, the PTEN variant p.Gln17fs, the HRAS variant p.Gly13Val and the BRAF variant p.Asp587Glu.

In addition, the resistant patient ID 11 was a 53 year old female patient, diagnosed as HER2-enriched BC in stage III and grade III. After surgery, she received chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Unfortunately, 10 months later, she suffered from pulmonary metastatic nodules and brain metastatic deposits. Her genetic analysis revealed 3 pathogenic variants: PIK3CA p.His1047Tyr, PTEN p.Gln17fs and BRAF p.Val600Glu.

Moreover, resistant patient ID 12 had five pathogenic variants (PIK3CA p.Glu545Lys, PIK3CA p.Tyr1021Cys, KRAS p.Ala146Val, PTEN p.Arg130Gln and frameshift deletion PTEN p.Gln17fs). This patient was diagnosed with luminal B breast cancer (ER+, PR+, HER2+) of stage IIIA and grade II, underwent radical mastectomy and received chemotherapy, tamoxifen and trastuzumab. However, she developed pulmonary metastasis and died in the second year of treatment.

Associations between the studied genetic mutations and pathologic complete response (pCR)

Among the studied genes, only a PIK3CA mutation showed a significant relationship with the trastuzumab response (Table 3). The pCR rate of patients with wild-type PIK3CA was significantly greater than that of patients with mutated PIK3CA (66.6% vs. 33.3%, odds ratio (OR) 10 and P = 0.036). Among the patients who achieved pCR in the responsive group, four patients had PIK3CA mutations. In contrast, two patients with wild-type PIK3CA did not achieve a pCR. Patients with PIK3CA mutations had a lower pCR rate (Table 3).

Table 3.

Univariate Analysis of Genetic Mutations and Response to Trastuzumab.

Gene pCR no. (%) NonpCR no. (%) ORa (95% CI) p
PIK3CA
Wild 8 (66.6%) 2 (16.6%)
Mutant 4 (33.3%) 10 (83.3%) 10 (1.44-69.2) 0.036*
PTEN
Wild 5 (41.6%) 7 (58.3%)
Mutant 7 (58.3%) 5 (41.6%) 0.51 (0.1-2.58) 0.684
KRAS
Wild 5 (41.6%) 7 (58.3%)
Mutant 7 (58.3%) 5 (41.6%) 0.51 (0.1-2.58) 0.684
APC
Wild 7 (58.3%) 11 (91.6)
Mutant 5 (41.6%) 1 (8.3%) 0.13 (0.01-1.33) 0.155
ABL1
Wild 8 (66.6%) 11 (91.6)
Mutant 4 (33.3%) 1 (8.3%) 0.18 (0.01-1.95) 0.316
HRAS
Wild 8 (66.6%) 11 (91.6)
Mutant 4 (33.3%) 1 (8.3%) 0.18 (0.01-1.95) 0.316
NRAS
Wild 11 (91.6) 9 (75%)
Mutant 1 (8.3%) 3 (25%) 3.66 (0.32-41.5) 0.59
CSF1R
Wild 11 (91.6) 9 (75%)
Mutant 1 (8.3%) 3 (25%) 3.66 (0.32-41.5) 0.59
SRC
Wild 11 (91.6) 10 (83.3%)
Mutant 1 (8.3%) 2 (16.6%) 2.2 (0.17-28.1) 1
BRAF
Wild 11 (91.6) 10 (83.3%)
Mutant 1 (8.3%) 2 (16.6%) 2.2 (0.17-28.1) 1
JAK3
Wild 11 (91.6) 11 (91.6)
Mutant 1 (8.3%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (0.05-18) 1

PIK3CA mutations currently investigated as part of FDA-approved diagnostic testing in BC

The FDA approved the companion diagnostic therascreen® PIK3CA test (QIAGEN Manchester, Ltd.), which is used to detect patients who have PIK3CA mutations in BC. The therascreen® PIK3CA test detects 11 PIK3CA hotspot mutations in exons 7, 9 and 20. Among these Therascreen 11 PIK3CA hotspot mutations, 5 PIK3CA variants were identified in the two currently studied groups: Cys420Arg, Glu542Lys, Glu545Lys, His1047Arg and His1047Tyr. These variants account for 51% of all detected PIK3CA mutations in this study. (Table S3, Figure S5)

Discussion

Many studies have investigated possible genetic biomarkers that affect the response of HER2+ BC to trastuzumab (the targeted therapy of choice) [7, 25, 11, 26, 20, 27]. Therefore, we aimed to perform a study to include oncogenes and other important pathways to demonstrate any association between trastuzumab response and frequent oncogenic mutations in Egyptian HER2+ BC patients.

Among the 17 studied genes, PIK3CA was the most frequently affected gene in patients (58.33%), with the highest percentage of variants (29.2% of the total resultant variants). In line with our findings, a recent Egyptian study [28] that sequenced 46 breast tumors of Egyptian BC patients revealed that PIK3CA was the most frequently mutated gene in 27 patients (58.7%). Additionally, Sherene Loi et al. [29] who genotyped 705 HER2+ BC patients receiving trastuzumab, PIK3CA was the most frequently mutated gene (25.3%). Moreover, PIK3CA was the most frequently mutated gene in a Chinese study targeting 520 cancer-related genes in 589 BC patients (45.0%, 265/589) [30]. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) p110α, encoded by the PIK3CA gene, is known to be one of the most important kinases activated in response to signaling from HER2 and other kinases. Abnormal activation of PI3K has long been recognized as one of the main oncogenic drivers in BC. It is thought that as a recombinant monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab binds to the extracellular domain IV of HER2, downregulating the PI3K/Akt pathway [12].

Additionally, in the present study, PIK3CA variants were more frequent in the resistant group (23 variants) than in the responsive group (8 variants). The most involved exons in the PIK3CA gene were exon 20 (29.1%, 7/24) and exon 9 (25%, 6/24). PIK3CA pathogenic variants (His1047Arg and His1047Tyr) were detected in exon 20, and Glu542Lys and Glu545Lys were detected in exon 9, constituting approximately 48% of all PIK3CA mutations. Similarly, in a study performed by Loibl S et al. [13] who evaluated PIK3CA mutations and their associations with pCR in 967 primary HER2+ BC patients, the number of mutations found in exon 20 was twice as high as that in exon 9 (14.5% vs 7.2%). Jensen JD et al. [14] who conducted a study in 240 HER2+ BC patients receiving adjuvant treatment, a total of 61 (26%) patients had either exon 20 or exon 9 mutations (17% vs 9%, respectively). Additionally, in the present study, six PIK3CA variants, His1047Tyr, Glu545Lys, His701Pro, Lys111Glu, Val344Gly and Tyr1021Cys, were detected only in the resistant patients. These variants might be related to trastuzumab resistance. The PIK3CA His1047Tyr and Tyr1021Cys variants were detected in exon 20, and the Glu545Lys variant was detected in exon 9. Previous studies revealed that PIK3CA mutations within exons 9 and 20 are associated with poor survival and HER2 targeted therapy resistance [13, 15-19].

Notably, our findings showed that among all the studied gene mutations identified by NGS, only a PIK3CA mutation had a significant relationship with the trastuzumab response. The pCR rate of patients with wild-type PIK3CA was significantly greater than that of patients with mutated PIK3CA (66.6% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.036). In line with our results, Qiyun Shi et al. [11] sequenced 50 HER2+ BC patients receiving targeted therapy. The pCR rate of patients with wild-type PIK3CA was significantly greater than that of patients with mutated PIK3CA (80.8% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.00057). Several additional clinical trials demonstrated that PIK3CA mutations were associated with a lower pCR rate in HER2+ BC patients receiving HER2-targeted therapy [11, 31, 32, 13, 33].

Moreover, the present study revealed other variants that were detected only in resistant patients, e.g., three PTEN variants. These PTEN variants included two deletions (Gln17fs, Cys105fs) and one SNV (Arg130Gln). In line with this finding, P. Lebok et al. [34] PTEN deletion is a frequent event in breast cancer patients with a poor prognosis. Many studies have also shown a relationship between PTEN alterations and sensitivity to trastuzumab [35-38, 3, 39, 40]. However, additional studies did not find a relationship between PTEN alterations and sensitivity to trastuzumab [41-43].

Moreover, in our study, two RAS variants were identified only in the resistant patients, KRAS Ala146val and HRAS Gly13Val, suggesting that they are associated with trastuzumab resistance. Notably, another study of metastatic colorectal cancer revealed that patients with KRAS Ala146 mutation had a greater tumor burden and worse clinical prognosis [44]. HRAS was previously reported to be an anti-HER2 therapy resistance-associated gene [27].

Furthermore, two BRAF variants were detected only in the resistant patients: Asp587Glu and Val600Glu. The BRAF Val600Glu mutation is known to be associated with poor prognosis due to inappropriate activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway, uncontrolled cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and a lack of apoptosis [45]. The BRAF Val600Glu mutation is a target of treatment for different types of malignancies, such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), hairy-cell leukemia and brain tumors [46-51]. In addition, the JAK3 Pro132Thr variant was found in patient ID 4 in the resistant group. In a recent Egyptian study that investigated the impact of somatic mutations in 55 BC patients, the JAK3 Pro132Thr variant was found in 3 patients [52].

In conclusion, collectively, our data suggested that PIK3CA mutations were significantly related to trastuzumab resistance. PIK3CA variants were more frequent in the resistant group than in the responsive group, with an association between PIK3CA mutation and a lower pCR rate. More PIK3CA variants within exons 9 and 20 were detected in resistant patients. Some PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, HRAS, JAK3 and BRAF gene variants were detected only in resistant patients, so these variants might be related to trastuzumab resistance. Consequently, these findings clarify the significance of the use of emerged PI3K/mTOR inhibitors to increase trastuzumab sensitivity in HER2+ BC resistant patients.

Finally, the limitation of this study was the small sample size. Therefore, further studies are recommended to investigate the genetic variants associated with the response of combined HER2 targeted therapy in HER2+ BC patients using a larger sample size.

Author Contribution Statement

AMM, MHS, DE, TAE, and DH participated in the study design. AMM was responsible for enrollment of the study subjects, and the gathering clinical data. AMM and MHS were responsible for the genetic analysis using Ion S5™ next-generation sequencing system and data analysis using Ion Reporter™ Software. AMM and MHS prepared the manuscript. MHS, DE, TA, and DH reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and agreed to the final form of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Cancer Genetics Unit at the Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt, which was established by the Science Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) (Grant No. 22832) for providing the instruments and some reagents. The study is a part of a PhD thesis.

Data Availability

The data supporting the conclusions are included within the article.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Alexandria University, Egypt. All methods were conducted in compliance with the appropriate guidelines and standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

List of Abbreviations

List of Abbreviations in the supplementary File.

Supplementary materials

References

  • 1.Chen H, Hu X, Wang D, Wang Y, Yu Y, Yao H. Association of pik3ca mutation with outcomes in her2-positive breast cancer treated with anti-her2 therapy: A meta-analysis and bioinformatic analysis of tcgabrca data. Transl Oncol. 2023;37:101738. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tesch ME, Gelmon KA. Targeting her2 in breast cancer: Latest developments on treatment sequencing and the introduction of biosimilars. Drugs. 2020;80(17):1811–30. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01411-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rimawi MF, De Angelis C, Contreras A, Pareja F, Geyer FC, Burke KA, et al. Low pten levels and pik3ca mutations predict resistance to neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in patients with her2 over-expressing breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(3):731–40. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4533-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang J, Xu B. Targeted therapeutic options and future perspectives for her2-positive breast cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4(1):34 . doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0069-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takada M, Toi M. Neoadjuvant treatment for her2-positive breast cancer. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020;9(3):32 . doi: 10.21037/cco-20-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata D, Chehade R, Hannouf MB, Raphael J, Blanchette P, Al-Humiqani A, et al. Appraisal of systemic treatment strategies in early her2-positive breast cancer-a literature review. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(17):4336. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang ZH, Zheng ZQ, Jia SC, Liu SN, Xiao XF, Chen GY, et al. Trastuzumab resistance in her2-positive breast cancer: Mechanisms, emerging biomarkers and targeting agents. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1006429. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1006429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xing F, Gao H, Chen G, Sun L, Sun J, Qiao X, et al. Cmtm6 overexpression confers trastuzumab resistance in her2-positive breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01716-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu X, Yang H, Yu X, Qin JJ. Drug-resistant her2-positive breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and overcoming strategies. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1012552. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1012552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zakaria NH, Hashad D, Saied MH, Hegazy N, Elkayal A, Tayae E. Genetic mutations in her2-positive breast cancer: Possible association with response to trastuzumab therapy. Hum Genomics. 2023;17(1):43 . doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00493-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shi Q, Xuhong J, Luo T, Ge J, Liu F, Lan Y, et al. Pik3ca mutations are associated with pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for her2-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023;128(1):121–9. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02021-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rasti AR, Guimaraes-Young A, Datko F, Borges VF, Aisner DL, Shagisultanova E. Pik3ca mutations drive therapeutic resistance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2100370. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loibl S, Majewski I, Guarneri V, Nekljudova V, Holmes E, Bria E, et al. Pik3ca mutations are associated with reduced pathological complete response rates in primary her2-positive breast cancer: Pooled analysis of 967 patients from five prospective trials investigating lapatinib and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1519–25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jensen JD, Knoop A, Laenkholm AV, Grauslund M, Jensen MB, Santoni-Rugiu E, et al. Pik3ca mutations, pten, and pher2 expression and impact on outcome in her2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2034–42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fan H, Li C, Xiang Q, Xu L, Zhang Z, Liu Q, et al. Pik3ca mutations and their response to neoadjuvant treatment in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Thorac cancer. 2018;9(5):571–9. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khoury K, Tan AR, Elliott A, Xiu J, Gatalica Z, Heeke AL, et al. Prevalence of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (pi3k) pathway alterations and co-alteration of other molecular markers in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baselga J, Cortes J, Im SA, Clark E, Ross G, Kiermaier A, et al. Biomarker analyses in cleopatra: A phase iii, placebo-controlled study of pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, first-line metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(33):3753–61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.5384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baselga J, Lewis Phillips GD, Verma S, Ro J, Huober J, Guardino AE, et al. Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in emilia, a phase iii study of trastuzumab emtansine in her2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(15):3755–63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bianchini G, Kiermaier A, Bianchi GV, Im YH, Pienkowski T, Liu MC, et al. Biomarker analysis of the neosphere study: Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, or pertuzumab plus docetaxel for the neoadjuvant treatment of her2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):16 . doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0806-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goutsouliak K, Veeraraghavan J, Sethunath V, De Angelis C, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, et al. Towards personalized treatment for early stage her2-positive breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(4):233–50. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0299-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jiang L, Ren L, Chen H, Pan J, Zhang Z, Kuang X, et al. Ncapg confers trastuzumab resistance via activating src/stat3 signaling pathway in her2-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(7):547 . doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02753-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nguyen HT, Le HT, Nguyen LT, Lou H, LaFramboise T. The applications of massive parallel sequencing (next-generation sequencing) in research and molecular diagnosis of human genetic diseases. VJSTE. 2018;60(2):30–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mardis ER. The impact of next-generation sequencing on cancer genomics: From discovery to clinic. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9(9):a036269. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ozer ME, Sarica PO, Arga KY. New machine learning applications to accelerate personalized medicine in breast cancer: Rise of the support vector machines. OMICS. 2020;24(5):241–6. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Palomeras S, Diaz-Lagares A, Vinas G, Setien F, Ferreira HJ, Oliveras G, et al. Epigenetic silencing of tgfbi confers resistance to trastuzumab in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1160-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sorokin M, Ignatev K, Barbara V, Vladimirova U, Muraveva A, Suntsova M, et al. Molecular pathway activation markers are associated with efficacy of trastuzumab therapy in metastatic her2-positive breast cancer better than individual gene expression levels. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2020;85:758–72. doi: 10.1134/S0006297920070044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ye Q, Qi F, Bian L, Zhang SH, Wang T, Jiang ZF. Circulating-free DNA mutation associated with response of targeted therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(5):522–9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.200542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nassar A, Abouelhoda M, Mansour O, Loutfy SA, Hafez MM, Gomaa M, et al. Targeted next generation sequencing identifies somatic mutations in a cohort of egyptian breast cancer patients. J Adv Res. 2020;24:149–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loi S, Michiels S, Lambrechts D, Fumagalli D, Claes B, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Somatic mutation profiling and associations with prognosis and trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(13):960–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xiao W, Zhang G, Chen B, Chen X, Wen L, Lai J, et al. Mutational landscape of pi3k-akt-mtor pathway in breast cancer: Implications for targeted therapeutics. J Cancer. 2021;12(14):4408–17. doi: 10.7150/jca.52993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Majewski IJ, Nuciforo P, Mittempergher L, Bosma AJ, Eidtmann H, Holmes E, et al. Pik3ca mutations are associated with decreased benefit to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(12):1334–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guarneri V, Dieci MV, Frassoldati A, Maiorana A, Ficarra G, Bettelli S, et al. Prospective biomarker analysis of the randomized cher-lob study evaluating the dual anti-her2 treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for her2-positive breast cancer. Oncologist. 2015;20(9):1001–10. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Loibl S, Majewski I, Guarneri V, Nekljudova V, Holmes E, Bria E, et al. Pik3ca mutations are associated with reduced pathological complete response rates in primary her2-positive breast cancer: Pooled analysis of 967 patients from five prospective trials investigating lapatinib and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(7):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lebok P, Kopperschmidt V, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, Ozden C, B T, et al. Partial pten deletion is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):963 . doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1770-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dave B, Migliaccio I, Gutierrez MC, Wu MF, Chamness GC, Wong H, et al. Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog or phosphoinositol-3 kinase activation and response to trastuzumab or lapatinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing locally advanced breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):166–73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.7814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Song MS, Salmena L, Pandolfi PP. The functions and regulation of the pten tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(5):283–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm3330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ning L, Guo-Chun Z, Sheng-Li A, Xue-Rui L, Kun W, Jian Z, et al. Inhibition of autophagy induced by pten loss promotes intrinsic breast cancer resistance to trastuzumab therapy. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(4):5445–54. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4392-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li G, Guo J, Shen B-Q, Yadav DB, Sliwkowski MX, Crocker LM, et al. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer cellsmechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab emtansine (t-dm1) Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17(7):1441–53. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim C, Lee C-K, Chon HJ, Kim JH, Park HS, Heo SJ, et al. Pten loss and level of her2 amplification is associated with trastuzumab resistance and prognosis in her2-positive gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(69):113494. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Tan YY, Fuchs EM, Hudelist G, Kostler WJ, Reiner A, et al. Pten expression as a predictor for the response to trastuzumab-based therapy in her-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stern HM, Gardner H, Burzykowski T, Elatre W, O’Brien C, Lackner MR, et al. Pten loss is associated with worse outcome in her2-amplified breast cancer patients but is not associated with trastuzumab resistancepten status and clinical outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(9):2065–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pogue-Geile KL, Song N, Jeong JH, Gavin PG, Kim SR, Blackmon NL, et al. Intrinsic subtypes, pik3ca mutation, and the degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in the nsabp b-31 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(12):1340–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Y, Liu Y, Du Y, Yin W, Lu J. The predictive role of phosphatase and tensin homolog (pten) loss, phosphoinositol-3 (pi3) kinase (pik3ca) mutation, and pi3k pathway activation in sensitivity to trastuzumab in her2-positive breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(6):633–42. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.794775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van ‘t Erve I, Wesdorp NJ, Medina JE, Ferreira L, Leal A, Huiskens J, et al. Kras a146 mutations are associated with distinct clinical behavior in patients with colorectal liver metastases. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021;5:PO. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mauri G, Bonazzina E, Amatu A, Tosi F, Bencardino K, Gori V, et al. The evolutionary landscape of treatment for braf(v600e) mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(1):137. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Seo T, Noguchi E, Yoshida M, Mori T, Tanioka M, Sudo K, et al. Response to dabrafenib and trametinib of a patient with metaplastic breast carcinoma harboring a braf v600e mutation. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2020;2020:2518383. doi: 10.1155/2020/2518383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tanda ET, Vanni I, Boutros A, Andreotti V, Bruno W, Ghiorzo P, et al. Current state of target treatment in braf mutated melanoma. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:154. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Giunta EF, De Falco V, Napolitano S, Argenziano G, Brancaccio G, Moscarella E, et al. Optimal treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients harboring braf-v600 mutations. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920925219. doi: 10.1177/1758835920925219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Qu J, Shen Q, Li Y, Kalyani FS, Liu L, Zhou J, et al. Clinical characteristics, co-mutations, and treatment outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with the braf-v600e mutation. Front Oncol. 2022;12:911303. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maitre E, Tomowiak C, Lebecque B, Bijou F, Benabed K, Naguib D, et al. Deciphering genetic alterations of hairy cell leukemia and hairy cell leukemia-like disorders in 98 patients. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(8):1904. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kowalewski A, Durslewicz J, Zdrenka M, Grzanka D, Szylberg L. Clinical relevance of braf v600e mutation status in brain tumors with a focus on a novel management algorithm. Target Oncol. 2020;15(4):531–40. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nassar A, Zekri ARN, Elberry MH, Lymona AM, Lotfy MM, Abouelhoda M, et al. Somatic mutations alter interleukin signaling pathways in grade ii invasive breast cancer patients: An egyptian experience. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44(12):5890–901. doi: 10.3390/cimb44120401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions are included within the article.


Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES