Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2025 Mar 4;99(4):e02092-24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02092-24

Changes in the motifs in the D0 and SD2 domains of the S protein drive the evolution of virulence in enteric coronavirus porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

Zhiqian Ma 1,2,#, Zhiwei Li 1,2,#, Yongqi Li 1,2, Xiaojing Zhao 1,2, Congsen Zheng 1,2, Yang Li 1,2, Xuyang Guo 1,2, Lele Xu 1,2, Zifang Zheng 1,2, Guangliang Liu 1,2, Haixue Zheng 1,2, Shuqi Xiao 1,2,
Editor: Tom Gallagher3
PMCID: PMC11998522  PMID: 40035514

ABSTRACT

Since 2010, highly virulent mutant GII subtype porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) strains derived from GI subtype strains have caused significant economic losses in the pig industry. However, the molecular mechanism of PEDV virulence evolution remains unclear. It has been predicted that, compared to the S proteins of GI strains, five N-linked glycosylation sites have changed in the highly virulent GII PEDV strains. To investigate how changes in these sites affect PEDV virulence, we constructed five recombinant strains harboring the above mutation sites using the GII subtype rPEDV-Swt as the backbone, among which rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722 were successfully rescued, but rPEDV-Smut235 was not. Compared to infection with rPEDV-Swt (100%), infection with rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 resulted in lower mortality in piglets (33%), and although rPEDV-Smut118 and rPEDV-Smut131 resulted in high mortality (100%), death was delayed. All surviving piglets were challenged orally with rPEDV-Swt at 21 days post-infection. The piglets in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups produced high levels of IgG, IgA, and cross-protective neutralizing antibodies, which protected the piglets after rPEDV-Swt challenge. Furthermore, the change in the structures of the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 S proteins predicted with high precision by AlphaFold 3 may be the cause of the attenuated virulence. Our data provide a unique perspective on the molecular mechanism of PEDV virulence evolution from the GI to the GII subtype and identify the targets of PED live attenuated vaccines.

IMPORTANCE

The continuous emergence of novel viral variants in the current landscape poses challenges for disease prevention and control. Before 2010, PED caused by GI strains was only sporadic outbreaks and not large-scale epidemics. Since 2010, highly virulent GII strains derived from GI strains have spread worldwide and caused significant economic losses. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the differences in virulence is still unclear. In this study, the differences in the predicted glycosylation sites of the S protein between the GI and GII strains were taken as the starting point to explore the key sites responsible for the variations in PEDV virulence. The results indicate that the motifs 57ENQGVNST64 and 722NSTF725 of the S protein in the GII strains are involved in the evolution of PEDV virulence. This study provides a new perspective on the molecular mechanism of PEDV virulence evolution.

KEYWORDS: porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, virulence evolution, spike protein, N-linked glycosylation, reverse genetic system

INTRODUCTION

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED), caused by PED virus (PEDV), poses a threat to the development of healthy animals in the pork industry worldwide and has not been effectively controlled to date. This is mainly because the variations and pathogenic mechanisms of PEDV are not fully clear. Understanding the epidemic variation mechanism of PEDV can contribute to effectively preventing and controlling PED.

PEDV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus that belongs to the Coronaviridae family. The PEDV genome is approximately 28 kb in length and encodes 4 structural proteins (S, E, M, and N), 16 nonstructural proteins (nsp1–nsp16), and 1 accessory protein (ORF3) (1). The S protein is a highly glycosylated trimeric protein that plays essential roles in the variation, tissue and cell tropism, pathogenicity, and infectivity of coronaviruses (25). The S glycoprotein is the main virulence factor of PEDV and is composed of an N-terminal receptor-binding S1 subunit and a C-terminal S2 subunit that contains a fusion element (6). Modification of the S protein or the loss of its structural integrity, which occurs in some naturally evolved strains, affects the virulence of PEDV (710).

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of viral proteins are crucial for immune escape and pathogenicity (11). The R203K+G204R mutation increases phosphorylation of the nucleocapsid (N) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), thereby enhancing its replication and pathogenesis (12). Acetylating K389 of the NS3 helicase of flaviviruses is indispensable for virus replication and infection (13). Among the many PTMs, glycosylation plays essential roles in protein folding, structure, and function (14). Glycosylation of viral proteins affects their receptor affinity, immune evasion, and pathogenicity. Removing the N-glycosyl groups from SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins enhances the binding affinity of neutralizing antibodies for the virus and reduces virus infectivity (1517). Two glycosylation sites in the S1B domain of the porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) S glycoprotein are critical for aminopeptidase N (APN) binding (18). Changes in the glycosylation sites of viral glycoproteins affect the virulence of the virus; for example, NSP4 glycosylation-defective rotavirus is less pathogenic than the wild-type virus, and unique glycosylation at position 986 on the E2 glycoprotein is responsible for viral attenuation (19, 20). However, little is known about the roles PTMs of PEDV proteins play in viral pathogenicity.

PEDV was first discovered in Belgium and the United Kingdom in 1976 and was detected in China as early as the 1980s (21). PEDV has evolved into two groups: GI (classical) and GII (variant). Furthermore, based on phylogenetic analyses of the complete genomes of PEDV, GI strains can be classified as GI‐a and GI‐b, and GII strains can be classified as GII‐a, GII‐b, and GII‐c (22). The GII‐c strains evolved from a recombinant virus that acquired the 5′ section of the spike gene from the GI‐a subgroup and the remaining genomic regions from the GII‐a subgroup. Before 2010, only sporadic outbreaks of PED caused by the GI genogroup occurred, but no large-scale epidemics occurred (22). Since 2010, PEDV variants, which are included mainly within the GII group, have spread worldwide and caused significant economic losses. GII-c strains appeared in 2010 and are intermediate strains that mutated from GI strains to GII strains. Compared to those in GI subtype strains, amino acid mutations, deletions, and insertions in the S and E proteins have been found in GII subtype strains (23, 24). Beginning in 2010, GII strains with increased virulence have abruptly emerged and spread on a large scale, but the mechanism underlying their virulence is unknown. The PEDV S protein is a key protein for strain classification. It is still unclear which motifs or sites in the PEDV S protein have an effect on the evolution of virus virulence. Owing to the many sites at which the S protein is expressed, we first focused on how the changes in the glycosylation sites of the PEDV S protein affected the evolution of virus virulence from the GI to the GII subtypes. Compared to the S proteins of PEDV GI subtype strains, five N-linked glycosylation sites with N-X-S/T motifs in the GII subtype PEDV strains, which are located at positions aa 62, aa 116, aa 131, aa 233, and aa 722, were predicted to change. We wondered whether changes in these motifs are part of the mechanism by which PEDV strains are attenuated.

In this study, a series of recombinant strains rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722 were obtained using the highly virulent GII rPEDV-Swt strain as the backbone. Compared to that of the rPEDV-Swt strain, the virulence of the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains was mildly attenuated. In addition, the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 retained immunogenicity and protected pigs from challenge with parental PEDV. This work indicates that the motifs 57ENQGVNST64 and 722SSTF725 of the S protein in GII strains participate in the evolution of PEDV virulence, which provides a new perspective on the molecular mechanism of PEDV virulence evolution and the targets of live attenuated PED vaccines.

RESULTS

The S protein mutation sites during PEDV evolution from the GI to GII strains

Our previous research confirmed that the recombinant strain PEDV rCH/SX/2015 is an attenuated strain, whereas rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP is a virulent strain (23). To investigate the molecular mechanism of the attenuation of the rCH/SX/2015 strain, the genome sequences of these two strains were compared. There were many differences between the genomes of the rCH/SX/2015 and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP strains, including the presence of the confirmed virulence factor E protein (23). Considering that the S protein is glycosylated at many sites, we speculated that one of the reasons for the differences in virulence between the strains rCH/SX/2015 and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP was a difference in S protein glycosylation. Therefore, the N-linked glycosylation sites of the S proteins of rCH/SX2015 and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP (rPEDV-Swt) strains were predicted using the NetNGlyc 1.0 server. As shown in Fig. 1A, compared to the S protein of rCH/SX2015, the N-linked glycosylation motifs of rPEDV-Swt S protein were predicted to be different at positions aa 62, aa 116, aa 131, aa 233, and aa 722, which correspond to positions aa 57, aa 112, aa 127, aa 229, and aa 718 of the S protein of strain rCH/SX2015. To determine the distribution of these motifs among different subtypes of PEDV, the S proteins of 395 PEDV strains (10 of subtype GI-a, 14 of subtype GI-b, 288 of subtype GII-a, 17 of subtype GII-b, and 66 of subtype GII-c) were compared; among them, CH/SX/2015 belongs to GI-b, and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP belongs to GII-a (Fig. 1B). The predicted glycosylation of aa 57 in the NSSS motif varied as follows: GI-a strains (100%, 10/10), GI-b strains (100%, 14/14), GII-c strains (100%, 66/66), GII-a strains (1.39%, 4/288), and GII-b strains (0%, 0/17). Compared to these strains, the GII-b and other GII-a strains presented certain differences in amino acid sequence, including a four amino acid insertion (59QGVN62) and mutation of aa 60 from S to T, which resulted in the 57NSSS60 motif changing to 57ENQGVNST64, and both 57NSSS60 and 62NSTW65 were predicted to be glycosylation motifs. The predicted N-linked glycosylation motif 112NSTA115 is present only in GI-b strains (100%, 14/14). The predicted N-linked glycosylation motif 127NKTL130 was found in all GI-a (100%, 10/10) and GI-b (100%, 14/14) strains and most GII-c (96.97%, 64/66) strains, but in only 4 (1.39%, 4/288) and 5 GII-b strains (2.94%, 5/17). The motif 229NCSG232 is also present mainly in GI-a (80%, 8/10), GI-b (100%, 14/14), and GII-c (96.97%, 64/66), along with 4 GII-a strains (1.39%, 4/288), whereas this motif was not found in any GII-b strains (0%, 0/17). The proportions of the different PEDV genotypes containing the 718NSTF721 motif are as follows: GI-a (100%, 10/10), GI-b (100%, 14/14), GII-c (7.58%, 5/66), GII-a (12.85%, 37/288), and GII-b (1.76%, 3/17) (Fig. 1C and D). In summary, these five motifs are located mainly in PEDV GI strains, which were prevalent primarily before 2010, and in GII-c strains that appeared in 2010 (22). Nevertheless, relatively few or no in GII (GII-a and GII-b) strains with high virulence emerged after 2010. The above results indicate that these five motifs may play essential roles in the transformation of PEDV from the GI subtype to the GII subtype.

Fig 1.

Illustration depicts protein structures with glycosylation sites, circular phylogenetic tree with grouped classifications, bar graph comparing glycosylation site %s across groups, and table listing N-linked glycosylation motifs across different strains.

Distribution of mutation sites that appeared in the S protein during the evolution of PEDV from the GI strains to GII strains. (A) Domains of the S proteins of the PEDV CH/SX/2015 and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP (rPEDV-Swt) strains; the domain boundaries are indicated below. SS, signal sequence; D0, domain 0; NTD, N-terminal domain of S1; SD1, subdomain 1 of S1; CTD, C-terminal domain of S1; SD2, subdomain 2 of S1; FP, fusion peptide; HR1, heptad repeat 1; HR2, heptad repeat 2; and TM, transmembrane domain. The five red numbers represent the N-linked glycosylation sites unique to the CH/SX/2015 S protein compared to the rPEDV-Swt S protein. (B) A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA X software with 1,000 bootstrap replicates and default parameters based on the amino acid sequences of 395 PEDV S proteins. The red circles indicate the S proteins of the PEDV CH/SX/2015 and rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP (rPEDV-Swt) strains in this study. (C) Distribution of the five N-linked glycosylation sites among different PEDV subtypes. (D) Amino acid sequences of the different subtypes at the five N-linked glycosylation sites.

Identification of glycosylation sites

The full-length S protein (Swt) and mutant proteins (Swt-N62A, Smut62, SmutN62A, Smut118, Smut131, Smut235, and Smut722) were transfected into HEK-293T cells, and their expression and mobility were detected via a 7% Tris-acetate gel electrophoresis. The Swt protein and its mutants were all expressed and showed no difference in mobility (Fig. 2A). Because the predicted N-linked glycosylation sites are located in the D0 and SD2 domains (Fig. 1A), respectively, the plasmids expressing the D0 and SD2 domains and their mutants were constructed. Then, the plasmids were transfected into HEK-293T cells, and their expression and mobility were detected. Compared to that of SD0-mut62 (57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification), the mobility of SD0-mutN62A (57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification, then 57NSSS60 to 57ASSS60 modification) was changed. Compared to that of SD0, the mobility of SD0-N62A (62NSTW65 to 62ASTW65 modification) also changed. After treatment with PNGase F, the mobility of the SD0-mutN62A protein was the same as that of the SD0-mut62 protein, and the mobility of the SD0-N62A protein was the same as that of the SD0 protein, indicating that the differences in mobility are due to the different degrees of glycosylation, thus indicating that the 57NSSS60 motif in CH/SX/2015 and the 62NSTW65 motif in rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP were glycosylated (Fig. 2B). The same method was used to further clarify that the mutated motifs 131NKTL134, 233NCSG236, and 722NSTF725 were glycosylated (Fig. 2C through F). The results confirmed that the predicted sites were glycosylated when the proteins were expressed in the forms of the D0 and SD2 domains.

Fig 2.

Western blots present protein expression and glycosylation analysis with wild-type and mutant samples. PNGase F treatment is applied to assess glycosylation. Actin is used as loading control. Molecular weight markers depict protein size variations.

Identification of N-linked glycosylation sites. Plasmids expressing full-length S proteins (pCMV6-EV, pCMV6-Swt, pCMV6-Swt-N62A, pCMV6-Smut62, pCMV6-SmutN62A, pCMV6-Smut118, pCMV6-Smut131, pCMV6-Smut235, and pCMV6-Smut722) and truncated proteins (pCMV6-SD0, pCMV6-SD0-N62A, pCMV6-SD0-mut62, pCMV6-SD0-mutN62A, pCMV6-SD0-mut118, pCMV6-SD0-mut131, pCMV6-SD0-mut235, pCMV6-SSD2, and pCMV6-SSD2-N722S) were transfected into HEK-293T cells. The mobility of full-length S protein (Swt) and mutant proteins (Swt-N62A, Smut62, SmutN62A, Smut118, Smut131, Smut235, and Smut722) was analyzed by Western blotting using 7% Tris-acetate gel (A). The mobility of the motifs 57NSSS60 and 62NSTW65 (B), 116NTSA119 (C), 131NTSA134 (D), 233NCSG236 (E), and 722NSTF725 (F) in the S-truncated proteins was analyzed by Western blotting.

In vitro characterization of the recombinant strains

Considering the changes in the above motifs that occurred during the evolution of virulence of PEDV from the GI strains to GII strains, we speculated that changes in these sites are related to viral virulence. A series of recombinant strains (rPEDV-Smut62 [57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification], rPEDV-Smut118 [116NTNA119 to 116NTSA119 modification], rPEDV-Smut131 [131IKTL134 to 131NKTL134 modification], rPEDV-Smut235 [233NCIG236 to 233NCSG236 modification], and rPEDV-Smut722 [722SSTF725 to 722NSTF725 modification]) were constructed using the rPEDV-Swt strain as the backbone. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (Fig. 3A) and Sanger sequencing (Fig. 3B) revealed that four recombinant strains were successfully rescued, with the exception of rPEDV-Smut235. To understand the growth properties of these PEDV recombinant strains in VERO cells, VERO cells were infected with rPEDV-Swt or the recombinant strains at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1. At 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h post-infection (hpi), the cell supernatants were collected, and the viral titer in the cell supernatants was measured to monitor the multistep growth kinetics. The results revealed no difference in virus titer among all the groups at 0 hpi, indicating that the titer of each virus was similar at the initial infection. Compared to that of rPEDV-Swt, the titer of rPEDV-Smut62 decreased at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hpi, the titer of rPEDV-Smut118 decreased at 12 and 24 hpi, and the titer of rPEDV-Smut722 decreased at 48 hpi (Fig. 3C). The plaque phenotypes of these recombinant strains were further explored. Compared to rPEDV-Swt, only rPEDV-Smut62 formed smaller plaques (Fig. 3D). In brief, these results demonstrated that rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722 were successfully rescued.

Fig 3.

Illustration presents immunofluorescence analysis, sequencing chromatograms, virus titer graph, and plaque assays with quantification. Recombinant PEDV-S variants are compared for infection efficiency, genetic changes, and viral plaque formation.

In vitro characterization of the recombinant strains. (A) VERO cells were infected with rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722. Infected cells were fixed at 36 hpi and immunolabeled with a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). (B) VERO cells were infected with rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722. Infected cells were harvested at 36 hpi. Total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed. Rescue of the rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722 strains were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. (C) VERO cells in 12-well plates were infected with rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, or rPEDV-Smut722 at an MOI of 0.1. The supernatant was harvested at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hpi and titrated with VERO cells. (D) Plaques of recombinant PEDVs in VERO cells. The size of the plaque was calculated using ImageJ software. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Each group was compared to the rPEDV-Swt group at the same time point. Significance is indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. The error bars indicate standard deviations.

The effects of the recombinant strains were attenuated in piglets

To assess the pathogenicity of these recombinant strains, 37 newborn piglets were randomly divided into six groups, with 7 pigs in the mock group and 6 pigs in the other groups. The piglets were orally inoculated with rPEDV-Swt or a recombinant strain at a dose of 104 TCID50, while the piglets in the mock group were given an equal volume of DMEM. All the piglets in the rPEDV-Swt group developed severe diarrhea (100% [6/6]) and died (100% [6/6]) within 5 dpi (Fig. 4A and B). Although the final diarrhea rates in all the recombinant strain groups were 100%, diarrhea peaked on the third day after infection, whereas all the piglets in the rPEDV-Swt group experienced watery diarrhea on the second day. Compared to the rPEDV-Swt group (average diarrhea score = 3), the other groups presented relatively mild diarrhea on the second day: rPEDV-Smut62 (average diarrhea score = 2.167), rPEDV-Smut118 (average diarrhea score = 2.167), rPEDV-Smut131 (average diarrhea score = 1.833), and rPEDV-Smut722 (average diarrhea score = 1.667). Furthermore, compared to the rPEDV-Swt group (average diarrhea score = 3), the rPEDV-Smut62 (average diarrhea score = 2.333) and rPEDV-Smut722 (average diarrhea score = 2.5) presented relatively mild diarrhea on the third day (Fig. 4A). In addition, only two pigs (33% [2/6]) in the rPEDV-Smut62 inoculated group died, one each on days 5 and 11. The piglets in the rPEDV-Smut118 (100% [6/6]) and rPEDV-S mut131(100% [6/6]) groups all died on the 7th and 10th days after infection. Two piglets (33% [2/6]) in the rPEDV-Smut722 died, one each on days 8 and 10 (Fig. 4B). With the exception of the rPEDV-Smut722 group, in which viral shedding peaked on the fourth day after infection, viral RNA fecal shedding peaked on the third day after infection in the other groups. In addition, compared to the highest level of viral shedding, which occurred in the rPEDV-Swt group (4.7 × 1010 copies/mL), the rPEDV-Smut62 group (3.2 × 1010 copies/mL), the rPEDV-Smut118 group (1.4 × 1010 copies/mL), the rPEDV-Smut131 group (4.6 × 109 copies/mL), and the rPEDV-Smut722 group (6.5 × 109 copies/mL) exhibited lower viral RNA fecal shedding (Fig. 4C). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining revealed that all of the infected epithelial cells exhibited wide distribution of the PEDV antigen. The average optical density (AOD) was calculated to indicate positive antigen staining in the small intestine. The AODs in the jejunums of the rPEDV-Smut62 (10.573), rPEDV-Smut118 (14.215), and rPEDV-Smut131 (12.543) groups were lower than that of the rPEDV-Swt group (20.855). Furthermore, the AODs in the ileums of the rPEDV-Smut62 (10,764), rPEDV-Smut131 (7.338), and rPEDV-Smut722 (12.755) groups were lower than that of the rPEDV-Swt group (14.816) (Fig. 4D). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed that all four recombinant strains caused milder histopathological lesions to the intestinal villi in the jejunum, but only the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains caused milder histopathological lesions to the intestinal villi than did the rPEDV-Swt strain in the ileum (Fig. 4E). The villous height/crypt depth (VH/CD) ratio in the jejunum of the rPEDV-Swt group was markedly lower than those in the other infection groups. The VH/CD ratio in the ileum of the rPEDV-Swt group was significantly lower than those in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups but did not differ from those in the rPEDV-Smut118 and rPEDV-Smut131 groups (Fig. 4F). Collectively, these data suggested that the virulence of the recombinant strains rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 was mildly attenuated in neonatal piglets.

Fig 4.

Illustration presents fecal consistency scores, survival percentage, and viral RNA shedding over time. Immunofluorescence and histopathological analyses compare jejunum and ileum infection. Bar graph quantifies villus height to crypt depth ratios.

Pathogenicity of the recombinant strains in piglets. (A) Fecal scores of the pigs. The fecal scores were determined as follows: 0, solid; 1, pasty; 2, semiliquid; and 3, liquid. Each line indicates the mean score of a group. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between rPEDV-Swt and rPEDV-Smut62 (*P < 0.05). Thetas (θ) indicate significant differences between rPEDV-Swt and rPEDV-Smut131 (θθP < 0.01). Sigmas (σ) indicate significant differences between rPEDV-Swt and rPEDV-Smut722 (σσP < 0.01). (B) Survival curves of the piglets. The data were analyzed using the log-rank test (**P < 0.01). (C) Fecal shedding of PEDV RNA. Viral RNA was isolated from rectal swab samples daily and subjected to RT‒qPCR to determine the number of PEDV N gene RNA copies. (D) Immunohistochemical staining images of the PEDV N protein in the jejunum and ileum. The number of antigen signals was calculated using ImageJ software. (E) H&E staining of the jejunum and ileum from dying or euthanized piglets. (F) VH:CD ratios of the piglets. Ten villi from each intestinal section were measured. The differences among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Each group was compared to the rPEDV-Swt group at the same time point. The error bars indicate standard deviations.

The rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains protected pigs against wild-type virus challenge

At 21 dpi, the remaining pigs were challenged with the virulent rPEDV-Swt strain at the high dose of 1 × 106 TCID50/pig. One pig in the mock-challenged group began to experience diarrhea at 3 days post-challenge (dpc), and all pigs in the mock-challenged group experienced severe diarrhea (average diarrhea score >2) at 5–9 dpc (100% [6/6]), which improved at 9 dpc. Moreover, no pigs experienced diarrhea (average diarrhea score <1) in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups (Fig. 5A). All of the piglets in each group did not die at the end of the study (Fig. 5B). Moreover, compared to the highest level of viral shedding (4.0 × 109 copies/mL), which occurred in the mock-challenged group, the pigs in the rPEDV-Smut62 (7.4 × 105 copies/mL) and rPEDV-Smut722 (5.1 × 105 copies/mL) groups presented significantly less PEDV RNA shedding (Fig. 5C and D). There was residual diarrhea feces on the anus of the mock-challenged piglets, whereas the anuses of the piglets in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups were clean (Fig. 6A). At 9 dpc, all the pigs were sacrificed and necropsied, and the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups of pigs presented no significant gross lesions in their intestinal tissue, whereas thin-walled and gas-distended intestines were observed in the piglets from the mock-challenged group (Fig. 6A). IHC staining showed the wide distribution of the PEDV antigen in the ileum epithelial cells in the mock-challenged group. However, no antigens were detected in the ileum epithelial cells of pigs in either the rPEDV-Smut62 or the rPEDV-Smut722 groups (Fig. 6B). H&E staining revealed that there was almost no damage to the intestinal villi of the pigs in either the rPEDV-Smut62 or the rPEDV-Smut722 groups, whereas the pigs in the mock-challenged group presented more severe damage (Fig. 6C). The VH/CD ratio in the ileum of the mock-challenged group was significantly lower than those of the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups (Fig. 6D). In general, the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains protected against wild-type virus challenge in pigs.

Fig 5.

Illustration presents fecal consistency scores, survival percentage, and viral RNA shedding over time. Gel electrophoresis presents viral detection in samples. Recombinant PEDV-S variants are compared for infection outcomes and viral shedding dynamics.

Clinical signs of piglets after rPEDV-Swt challenge. (A) Fecal scores of piglets on different days post-challenge (dpc). Fecal scores were scored as follows: 0, solid; 1, pasty; 2, semiliquid; and 3, liquid. Each line indicates the mean score of a group. (B) Survival curves of piglets on different dpc. (C) and (D) Evaluation of PEDV RNA shedding in pig feces post-challenge by RT–qPCR and RT‒PCR. The differences among groups were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between mock and rPEDV-Smut62. Sigmas (σ) indicate significant differences between mock and rPEDV-Smut722. Significance is indicated as */σP < 0.05, **/σσP < 0.01, and ***/σσσP < 0.001. The error bars indicate standard deviations.

Fig 6.

Illustration presents diarrhea symptoms, intestinal morphology, immunofluorescence of ileum tissue, histopathological analysis, and VH- CD ratio. Recombinant PEDV-S variants are compared for infection effects on intestinal structure and viral presence.

Changes in piglet intestines 9 days after rPEDV-Swt challenge. (A) Clinical diarrhea and gross lesions of the small intestine. (B) Immunohistochemical staining images of the PEDV N protein in the ileum. (C) H&E staining images of the ileums from dying or euthanized piglets. (D) VH:CD ratios of the piglets. Ten villi from each intestinal section were measured. The differences among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Each group was compared to the rPEDV-Swt group at the same time point. The significance is indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. The error bars indicate standard deviations.

The rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains induce high levels of SlgA, IgG, and effective cross-protection neutralizing antibodies

To determine whether piglets infected with the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 exhibit an antibody response, serum samples were collected at 21 dpi/0 dpc and 28 dpi/7 dpc, and then the titer of anti-PEDV N IgG, anti-PEDV S IgA, and viral neutralization antibodies in the serum were determined. The piglets in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups presented significantly higher serum levels of anti-PEDV N IgG and S IgA than those in the mock group at 21 dpi/0 dpc and 28 dpi/7 dpc (Fig. 7A and B). The serum of the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups elicited robust neutralizing antibody responses to the rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut722, and CH/SX/2015 strains. Moreover, the ability of rPEDV-Smut62 serum to neutralize the CH/SX/2015 strain was higher than that of the rPEDV-Swt strain at 21 dpi/0 dpc and 28 dpi/7 dpc (Fig. 7C and D). Secretory immunoglobulin A (SlgA) is crucial for protecting against PEDV. Therefore, throat and fecal swabs were collected, and the SlgA levels in saliva and feces were detected. Compared to the mock-challenged group, the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups presented significantly higher levels of SlgA in saliva and feces. Moreover, the level of SlgA increased after challenging the virulent rPEDV-Swt strain (Fig. 7E and F). In summary, the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains induced cross-protection against the GI and GII subtypes of PEDV.

Fig 7.

Illustration presents serum anti-PEDV N IgG, anti-PEDV S IgA, virus-neutralizing antibody titers, and anti-PEDV S IgA levels in fecal and throat swabs. Recombinant PEDV-S variants are compared for immune responses post-inoculation and post-challenge.

Protection induced by the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strain against rPEDV-Swt challenge in pigs. (A and B) The levels of anti-PEDV N IgG and PEDV S IgA in sera collected at 21 and 28 dpi. (C and D) Viral neutralizing antibody titer against the PEDV GI and GII strains in serum collected at 21 and 28 dpi (7 dpc). (E and F) Levels of SlgA secreted in feces and saliva. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by an unpaired t test. Significance is indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. The error bars indicate standard deviations.

The recombinant strains were genetically stable after serial passaging in vitro and in vivo

To evaluate the genetic stability of the recombinant strains rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62, rPEDV-Smut118, rPEDV-Smut131, and rPEDV-Smut722 in vitro, the recombinant strains were serially passaged from P1 to P10 in VERO cells. The whole-genome sequences of the recombinant strains from P5 to P10 were determined via Sanger sequencing, and the results revealed no reversion mutations at positions aa 62, aa 118, aa 131, and aa 722 of the S proteins of these strains (Table 1). However, one mutation (G965S) was identified in the S protein of rPEDV-Smut62, and one mutation (S70L) was identified in the E protein of the rPEDV-Smut722 strain at P10. No mutations were detected in the other three strains (Table 2). Moreover, the genetic stability of the mutants was evaluated by sequencing rectal swab samples collected from piglets infected with the recombinant strains at the indicated times: rPEDV-Smut62 (8 dpi), rPEDV-Smut118 (6 dpi), rPEDV-Smut131 (8 dpi), and rPEDV-Smut722 (8 dpi). The results revealed that there were no reversion mutations in the corresponding mutation motifs of the recombinant strains (Table 1). However, two mutations K1028N and D1172A were identified in the S protein from the rectal swab samples of rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 infected piglets at 8 dpi, respectively (Table 2). Collectively, the results from passaging the recombinant strains in either cell culture or piglets revealed that the recombinant strains were genetically stable.

TABLE 1.

Sequencing of the reversions in the recombinant virusesa

Nucleotide location (S) Wild type Mutant type Passages/days
rPEDV-Smut62 (bp 163–183)/(aa 54–61) ACTGGTGAAAACCAGGGTGTCAATTCAACTTGG
(TGENQGVNSTW)
ACTGGTAACTCTTCTAGCTGG
(TGNSSSW)
P5
rPEDV-Smut62 (bp 163–183)/(aa 54–61) ACTGGTGAAAACCAGGGTGTCAATTCAACTTGG
(TGENQGVNSTW)
ACTGGTAACTCTTCTAGCTGG
(TGNSSSW)
P10
rPEDV-Smut118 (bp 346–363)/(aa 116–122) AACGGTAACACTAATGCT
(NGNTNA)
AACGGTAACACTASTGCT
(NGNTSA)
P5
rPEDV-Smut118 (bp 346–363)/(aa 116–122) AACGGTAACACTAATGCT
(NGNTNA)
AACGGTAACACTASTGCT
(NGNTSA)
P10
rPEDV-Smut131 (bp 385–402)/(aa 129–134) CCTAACATTAAAACATTG
(PNIKTL)
CCTAACAATAAAACATTG
(PNNKTL)
P5
rPEDV-Smut131 (bp 385–402)/(aa 129–134) CCTAACATTAAAACATTG
(PNIKTL)
CCTAACAATAAAACATTG
(PNNKTL)
P10
rPEDV-Smut722 (bp 2158–2175)/(aa 719–725) TTGTCTAGCTCCACTTTT
(LSSSTF)
TTGTCTAACTCCACTTTT (LSNSTF) P5
rPEDV-Smut722 (bp 2158–2175)/(aa 719–725) TTGTCTAGCTCCACTTTT
(LSSSTF)
TTGTCTAACTCCACTTTT (LSNSTF) P10
rPEDV-Smut62 (bp 163–183)/(aa 54–61) ACTGGTGAAAACCAGGGTGTCAATTCAACTTGG
(TGENQGVNSTW)
ACTGGTAACTCTTCTAGCTGG
(TGNSSSW)
D8
rPEDV-Smut118 (bp 346–363)/(aa 116–122) AACGGTAACACTAATGCT
(NGNTNA)
AACGGTAACACTASTGCT
(NGNTSA)
D6
rPEDV-Smut131 (bp 385–402)/(aa 129–134) CCTAACATTAAAACATTG
(PNIKTL)
CCTAACAATAAAACATTG
(PNNKTL)
D6
rPEDV-Smut722 (bp 2158–2175)/(aa 719–725) TTGTCTAGCTCCACTTTT
(LSSSTF)
TTGTCTAACTCCACTTTT (LSNSTF) D8
a

The mutations are marked in bold and underlined.

TABLE 2.

Mutations in the remaining genomes of the recombinant viruses of P10 or day 8

Nucleotide location (S) Wild type Mutant type Passages/days
rPEDV-Smut62 (bp 2887–2898)/(aa 963–966) CTAGGAGGTTTT
(LGGF)
CTAGGAAGTTTT
(LGSF)
P10
rPEDV-Smut722 (E) (bp 25649–25667) CCCCTCCCTAGTACTGTT
(PLPSTV)
CCCCTCCTTAGTACTGTT
(PLPLTV)
P10
rPEDV-Smut62 (bp 3076–3090)/(aa 1026–1034) ACTTCCAAGGGTTTG
(TSKGL)
ACTTCCAATGGTTTG
(TSNGL)
D8
rPEDV-Smut722 (bp 3508–3522)/(aa 1170–1174) GCCATCGATGGCTTA
(AIDGL)
GCCATCGCTGGCTTA
(AIAGL)
D8
a

The mutations are marked in bold and underlined.

The change in the 57ENQGVNST64 motif to 57NSSS60 and from the 718SSTF721 motif to 722NSTF725 alters the homotrimeric structure of the S protein

To further analyze the molecular mechanism of rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 attenuated virulence, the trimeric S proteins of the recombinant viruses were constructed using AlphaFold 3. Ramachandran plot results revealed that approximately 99.9% of the amino acid residues in Swt, Smut62, and Smut722 were in the reasonable region, indicating that the predicted protein structures are highly reliable and can serve as a template for research (Fig. 8A through C). The PyMOL was used to superimpose the structures of the Swt and Smut62 homotrimeric proteins, and the results revealed that the overall root mean square deviation (RMSD) between them was 0.385, suggesting good overlap. The aa 57–59 segment of the Swt protein adopted an α-helical structure, whereas the corresponding position of the Smut62 protein adopted a loop structure, which indicates that the structure at this location had undergone significant changes (Fig. 8D). The same method was used for comparing the Swt and Smut722 proteins, and the RMSD was 0.337, suggesting good overlap between Swt and Smut722. Although the trimeric structures of these two proteins remained unchanged near aa 722, there were significant changes to the hydrogen bonding interactions. aa 722 of the Swt protein is a polar uncharged serine residue that does not form any polar interactions with the surrounding amino acids. However, aa 722 of Smut722 is a polar uncharged asparagine residue, and the amino group of the asparagine side chain forms a hydrogen bond with serine at position 721, with a distance of 3.5 Å (Fig. 8E). Therefore, these structural changes may lead to changes in the performance of rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722.

Fig 8.

Illustration presents Ramachandran plots for S wild-type and mutants, structural models of spike protein, and close-up views of mutation sites. Recombinant PEDV-S variants are compared for dihedral angles and structural modifications.

Structural prediction of the PEDV Swt, Smut62, and Smut722 proteins using AlphaFold 3. (A–C) Ramachandran plots of the predicted structures of PEDV Swt, Smut62, and Smut722. The red, yellow, light yellow, and white regions represent the favored, allowed, “generously allowed,” and unallowed regions, respectively. (D) Overlay of the predicted structures of Swt and Smut62 and an enlarged view of aa 57–62. (E) Overlay of the predicted structures of Swt and Smut722 and an enlarged view of aa 721–722.

DISCUSSION

PEDV remains a significant concern that affects the development of healthy animals in the pork industry worldwide. Immunization with safe and effective vaccines is the main approach for controlling the spread of PEDV. However, the available vaccines cannot provide complete protection against newly emerging virulent strains of PEDV. The main reason for this is the high degree of variation in the S protein. Before 2010, PED caused by the GI genogroup was only sporadic outbreaks and not large-scale epidemics. Since 2010, GII PEDV variants have spread worldwide and caused significant economic losses. The PEDV S protein is a glycoprotein and a major virulence factor (6, 25). Therefore, we predicted the glycosylation sites of the S protein. Compared to the S proteins of the GI strains, five predicted N-linked glycosylation motifs changed in the PEDV GII strains. We further confirmed that the motifs 57NSSS60, 131NKTL134, 233NCSG236, and 722NSTF725 were glycosylated by expressing the D0 and SD2 domains (Fig. 2). When expressed by themselves, these domains may not fold properly compared to the full-length protein. We also expressed the full-length S protein and its mutants, but there was almost no difference in mobility (Fig. 2A). The possible reason is that the S protein is highly glycosylated, and changes in the mobility of the full-length S protein caused by modification of a single site may not be observable. Due to the four amino acid insertion 59QGVN62 mutation of aa 60 from S to T in the GII PEDV S protein, the motif at this site significantly changes. However, both the GI and GII strains have glycosylation sites here (57NSSS60 and 62NSTW65, respectively), but we cannot confirm how these differences in their motifs affect the virulence of PEDV.

The PEDV S1 subunit comprises domain 0 (D0; residues aa 34–233), the N-terminal domain, and the C-terminal domain with subdomains SD1 and SD2 (25). The D0 domain is responsible for sialic acid binding and has been confirmed to be a potential virulence determinant of PEDV strains (10, 26). Deletion of the D0 domain reduces the replication efficiency of PEDV and results in the loss of critical epitopes that induce protective immune responses (9, 27). The region containing aa 56–62 located in the D0 domain is highly variable and may be a key site driving the variations among PEDV strains. Compared to rPEDV-Swt, rPEDV-Smut62 has a reduced ability to replicate (Fig. 3), possibly due to a mutation at this site that alters the trimeric structure of the S protein (Fig. 8B), thereby affecting its binding to sialic acid. Notably, the virulence of rPEDV-Smut62 is attenuated, but it maintains good immunogenicity and can provide piglets with complete protection against virulent rPEDV-Swt challenge (Fig. 4 to 6). Because rPEDV-Smut62 contains the 59QGVN62 insertion and aa 60 S to T mutation, it is impossible to determine which change caused the attenuation of rPEDV-Smut62 virulence; thus, further research is needed. In addition, six neutralizing epitopes of the S protein have been identified, including D0 (aa 19–220), S1A (aa 435–485), the COE domain (aa 499–638), the epitope SS2 (aa 748–755), the epitope SS6 (aa 764–771), and the epitope 2C10 (aa 1368–1374) (28, 29). Changing the glycosylation sites in the RBD of the CoV spike protein can affect the production of IgG and neutralization titers in vivo (18, 30). The neutralizing antibodies produced by piglets infected with rPEDV-Smut62 effectively neutralized PEDV strains of both the GI and GII subtypes (Fig. 7C and D), indicating that the 57NSSS60 motif may be one of the important regions for neutralizing the epitope D0.

The rPEDV-Smut722 strain showed attenuated virulence in piglets and could completely protect piglets against rPEDV-Swt challenge. The corresponding mutated motif 722NSTF726 is located in the SD2 subdomain (Fig. 1). The SD2 subdomain participates in hinge-like motions that promote the conversion of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD between closed and opened conformations (31). Mutation to aa 722 affects the interactions with surrounding amino acids (Fig. 8C), which may affect the conformation of the RBD (open or closed) and lead to changes in virulence. Little is known about the function of PEDV SD2, but our research has established a clear correlation between SD2 and PEDV virulence.

Many viruses enter the host (human or animal) body through mucosal surfaces (32). The fecal-oral route is the main route of PEDV infection. SlgA is essential for defending against viruses that infect mucosal surfaces. The rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains induced high levels of SIgA in saliva, and SIgA plays a crucial role in the first step of PEDV infection. In addition, SIgA antibodies enter the colostrum via the gut-mammary-SIgA axis and provide lactogenic immunity to suckling piglets (33, 34). Compared to those in the mock-challenged group, the piglets in the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 groups presented high levels of both IgA in the serum and SlgA in the throat and fecal swabs (Fig. 7). These findings indicate that rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 trigger a systemic mucosal immune response. We can infer that the rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 strains may also induce SIgA production in the breast, which indicates that these two strains are promising live attenuated vaccine candidates. The nsp1, nsp2, nsp14, nsp15, nsp16, S, and E genes of PEDV are closely related to viral virulence (3537). It has been confirmed that the NTD and endocytosis signal of the S protein affect viral virulence (8, 9), and this study further clarifies that the D0 and SD2 domains in the S protein also affect virus virulence. However, in addition to those mentioned above, there are still many unexplored virulence factors of PEDV. Owing to their ability to induce broad and prolonged protective immunity, live attenuated vaccines are promising for controlling PEDV infections. However, safety is the main issue. A highly attenuated virus, which does not cause diarrhea in animals and elicits a neutralizing antibody response in virus-infected animals, may be produced by altering multiple virulence factors via a reverse genetic system.

In summary, this study revealed that the recombinant strains rPEDV-Smut62 and rPEDV-Smut722 were mildly attenuated and induced cross-protection in piglets. These findings suggest that the motifs 57ENQGVNST64 and 722SSTF725 of the S protein in GII strains play roles in the virulence evolution of PEDV and can serve as important targets for the design of live attenuated PEDV vaccines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses

VERO cells were preserved in our laboratory and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. PEDV strain CH/SX/2015 (GenBank no. MT783684) and CH/SX/2016 strain (GenBank no. MT787025) were stored in our laboratory. PEDV HNXP strain was kindly provided by Dr. Changxu Song. Previously, our group constructed and successfully rescued the recombinant strains rCH/SX/2016-SHNXP (rPEDV-Swt) and rCH/SX/2015 (38). PEDV propagation was performed in VERO cells.

Western blotting

HEK-293T cells seeded in six-well plates were transfected with plasmids expressing full-length S proteins (pCMV6-EV, pCMV6-Swt, pCMV6-Swt-N62A [62NSTW65 to 62ASTW65 modification], pCMV6-Smut62 [57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification], pCMV6-SmutN62A [57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification, and then 57NSSS60 to 57ASSS60 modification], pCMV6-Smut118 [116NTNA119 to 116NTSA119 modification], pCMV6-Smut131 [131IKTL134 to 131NKTL134 modification], pCMV6-Smut235 [233NCIG236 to 233NCSG236 modification], and pCMV6-Smut722 [722SSTF725 to 722NSTF725 modification]) and truncated proteins (pCMV6-SD0, pCMV6-SD0-N62A [62NSTW65 to 62ASTW65 modification], pCMV6-SD0-mut62 [57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification], pCMV6-SD0-mutN62A [57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification, and then 57NSSS60 to 57ASSS60 modification], pCMV6-SD0-mut118 [116NTNA119 to 116NTSA119 modification], pCMV6-SD0-mut131 [131IKTL134 to 131NKTL134 modification], pCMV6-SD0-mut235 [233NCIG236 to 233NCSG236 modification], pCMV6-SSD2, and pCMV6-SSD2-mut722 [722SSTF725 to 722NSTF725 modification]), respectively. At 36 h post-transfection, the cells were lysed with 200 µL of ice-cold RIPA buffer for 30 min on ice, and then the proteins in the supernatant were collected after centrifugation 12,000 × g at 4°C. Lysate aliquots were treated with PNGase F (P0704S; New England BioLabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Western blotting was performed as follows. For the full-length S protein, the samples were separated on a 7% Tris-acetate gel (P0534S, Beyotime) using the BeyoGel Tris-acetate SDS running buffer (P0749, Beyotime) and transferred onto PVDF membranes using western transfer buffer (P0021B, Beyotime). For the truncated S protein, the samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in PBST for 2 h at room temperature and then incubated with the PEDV S monoclonal antibody at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed with PBST and then incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, HRP (31430, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, the target proteins were detected with an enhanced WesterBright ECL kit (K-12045-D50, Advansta).

Constructing and rescuing chimeric full-length PEDV cDNA clones

The rPEDV-Smut62 (57ENQGVNST64 to 57NSSS60 modification), rPEDV-Smut118 (118NTNA121 to 118NTSA121 modification), rPEDV-Smut131 (131IKTL134 to 131NKTL134 modification), rPEDV-Smut235 (233NCIG236 to 233NCSG236 modification), and rPEDV-Smut722 (722SSTF725 to 722NSTF725 modification) strains were generated using a similar strategy as previously described with some modifications (23). In brief, 2.5 µg of the recombinant BAC plasmids was transfected into VERO cells using Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent. These VERO cells were cultured in medium supplemented with trypsin. CPE was monitored daily after transfection. When CPE was evident, the cells and supernatants were collected and subjected to freeze–thaw cycles for passage.

Identification of the recombinant strains

VERO cells were used for passaging and expansion of the PEDV recombinant strains. The recombinant strains were passaged to the 5th and 10th generations for RNA extraction using RNAiso Plus reagent (TaKaRa, Japan) and reverse transcribed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For sequencing, the fragments were amplified using the corresponding primers, which are listed in Table 3. The recombinant PEDV strains were produced in feces using the same method described above.

TABLE 3.

Primers in this studya

Primer name Sequence (5′−3′) Usage Reference
PEDV-S-F1
PEDV-S-R1
AGCCTACCACAAGATGTCAC
CTAGTGTCAACACAGAAAGAAC
Sequencing
PEDV-S-F2 CCATTCAGCGTATTCTTTATTGT Sequencing
PEDV-S-R2 CTAAAAGGCAATGCCGCTGC
PEDV-S-F3 GACTATAAGCGCTGTTCTAATG Sequencing
PEDV-S-R3 AGAAGACGCTTTAAACAGTGC
PEDV-N-Fb GAATTCCCAAGGGCGAAAAT RT–qPCR (35)
N gene probeb FAM-CGTAGCAGCTTGCTTCGGACCCA-BHQ
PEDV-N-Rb TTTTCGACAAATTCCGCATCT
a

F: forward primer. R: reverse primer. FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein; BHQ, black hole quencher.

b

Taqman RT-qPCR.

Indirect IFA

IFA was performed as previously described with slight modifications (23). VERO cells were infected with recombinant viruses for 36 h. The cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100. The cells were blocked with nonfat milk and then incubated with a mouse anti-N monoclonal antibody. The cells were washed with PBS and then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibody. Then, the cells were stained with 4-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope.

Real-time RT‒qPCR

RNA was extracted from the fecal swab samples using RNAiso Plus reagent and reverse transcribed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR. The cDNA content was determined with the AceQ Universal U+ Probe Master Mix V2 reagent (Vazyme, China) using the primers PEDV-N-F, PEDV-N-R, and the N gene probe shown in Table 3.

Growth kinetics

VERO cells were infected with recombinant viruses at an MOI of 0.1. After 1 h, the cells were washed with PBS and maintained in the maintenance medium containing 5 µg/mL trypsin. Samples of the cell supernatant were collected at different time points. The viral titer in the supernatants at the indicated time points was determined by the TCID50 assay.

Plaque assay

The plaque assay was performed according to a previous method (38). VERO cells in six-well plates were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of recombinant PEDVs. After 1 h, the cells were washed with PBS and covered with low-melting agarose containing 5 µg/mL trypsin. The cells were cultured for 4 days, the CPE was observed, and then the plaques were visualized by staining with neutral red dye. The size of the plaque was measured using ImageJ software.

Evaluation of the pathogenicity of the recombinant strains

Thirty-seven newborn piglets negative for transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), PEDV, PDCoV, and rotavirus (RV) were randomly divided into six groups, with six piglets in each experimental group and seven piglets in the mock group. At 2 days after birth, each piglet was orally inoculated with 1 × 104 TCID50 of the recombinant strains or mock inoculated with an equal volume of DMEM. The animals were monitored every 4 h for clinical signs of disease. The severity of diarrhea was scored. Rectal swabs were collected daily, and viral levels in the rectal swab samples were determined. Twelve days after infection, the remaining piglets that did not die or recover from diarrhea were used to calculate the survival rate of each group. Additionally, intestinal tissues obtained from the piglets that died from diarrhea after infection and one piglet in the mock group that was euthanized after 12 days were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with H&E. Moreover, IHC staining was also performed using an antibody against the PEDV N protein as the primary antibody. The antigen signals were evaluated using ImageJ software.

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the recombinant strains

Twenty-one days after initial infection, blood samples were collected from the surviving piglets. The piglets were subsequently inoculated with the parent strain (rPEDV-Swt) at a dose of 106 TCID50/pig. The clinical signs and mortality of the piglets were monitored every day. Rectal swabs and throat swabs were collected daily. The number of copies of viral RNA in the rectal swab samples was determined. Blood samples were collected at 7 dpc. All the piglets were euthanized at 9 dpc, and the intestinal tissues were collected for H&E and IHC staining.

ELISA detection of anti-PEDV N IgG and S lgA in serum, feces, and saliva samples

At 21 dpi/0 dpc and 28 dpi/7 dpc, serum samples were collected. The serum anti-PEDV N IgG and S lgA levels were detected with the ID Screen PEDV Antibody Detection ELISA Kit (IDvet, France) and PEDV lgA Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications. About 1 mL of PBS was added to the collected rectal and saliva swabs, which were subsequently centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. SlgA in the feces and saliva was detected using the PEDV lgA Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX, USA) with slight modifications.

Virus neutralization test

Heat-inactivated sera (56°C for 30 min) were serially diluted fourfold with DMEM. Then, the serum samples were mixed with equal volumes of virus mixture containing 200 TCID50 PEDV at 37°C for 90 min. VERO cells were inoculated with the serum–virus mixtures and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Moreover, incubation with the virus only, medium only, and positive and negative sera were used as controls. After being washed, the cells were cultured with DMEM containing 5 µg/mL trypsin. After 4  days, the neutralizing antibody titer was calculated using the Reed and Muench method. The neutralizing antibody titer of each serum sample was the reciprocal of the dilution with no CPE in 50% of the wells.

Predictions of protein structures

The N-glycosylation sites were predicted using the NetNGlyc 1.0 server available at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc-1.0/. The sequences of PEDV Swt, Smut62, and Smut722 were submitted to the AlphaFold 3 server (39), and the default parameters were used for the S protein trimer structure. Structural analysis and visualization were performed using PyMOL 2.3.0.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. The data were analyzed using an unpaired t test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 were considered statistically significant. Error bars indicate means ± SDs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20522, 32402888), the Joint Research Foundation of Gansu Province (24JRRA804, 23JRRA1476), the Major Scientific and Technological Special Project of Gansu Province (22ZD6NA001, 23ZDNA007, 24ZD13NA008), the Science and Technology Plan Project of Gansu Province (23JRRA561), the China Agriculture Research System of Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CARS-35), the Project of National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs (NCTIP-XD/C03), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M753579).

Contributor Information

Shuqi Xiao, Email: shqxiaojd@126.com.

Tom Gallagher, Loyola University Chicago - Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

ETHICS APPROVAL

All experimental programs involving pigs followed the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. All protocols were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute (LVRI) of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and the Animal Ethics Committee of Lanzhou Province, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All data generated during the current study are included in the article.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zhao Y, Fan B, Song X, Gao J, Guo R, Yi C, He Z, Hu H, Jiang J, Zhao L, Zhong T, Li B. 2024. PEDV-spike-protein-expressing mRNA vaccine protects piglets against PEDV challenge. mBio 15:e0295823. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02958-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tan Y, Sun L, Wang G, Shi Y, Dong W, Fu Y, Fu Z, Chen H, Peng G. 2021. The trypsin-enhanced infection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus is determined by the S2 subunit of the spike glycoprotein. J Virol 95:e02453-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02453-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhao S, Zhang H, Yang X, Zhang H, Chen Y, Zhan Y, Zhang X, Jiang R, Liu M, Liu L, Chen L, Tang W, Peng C, Gao X, Zhang Z, Shi Z, Gong R. 2021. Identification of potent human neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 implications for development of therapeutics and prophylactics. Nat Commun 12:4887. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25153-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhou P, Fan H, Lan T, Yang X-L, Shi W-F, Zhang W, Zhu Y, Zhang Y-W, Xie Q-M, Mani S, et al. 2018. Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin. Nature New Biol 556:255–258. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0010-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wrobel AG, Benton DJ, Roustan C, Borg A, Hussain S, Martin SR, Rosenthal PB, Skehel JJ, Gamblin SJ. 2022. Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the human host. Nat Commun 13:1178. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28768-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wang D, Ge X, Chen D, Li J, Cai Y, Deng J, Zhou L, Guo X, Han J, Yang H. 2018. The S gene is necessary but not sufficient for the virulence of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus novel variant strain BJ2011C. J Virol 92:e00603-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00603-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hou Y, Meulia T, Gao X, Saif LJ, Wang Q. 2019. Deletion of both the tyrosine-based endocytosis signal and the endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal in the cytoplasmic tail of spike protein attenuates porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in pigs. J Virol 93:e01758-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01758-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hou Y, Ke H, Kim J, Yoo D, Su Y, Boley P, Chepngeno J, Vlasova AN, Saif LJ, Wang Q. 2019. Engineering a live attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus vaccine candidate via inactivation of the viral 2’-o-methyltransferase and the endocytosis signal of the spike protein. J Virol 93:e00406-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00406-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hou Y, Lin CM, Yokoyama M, Yount BL, Marthaler D, Douglas AL, Ghimire S, Qin Y, Baric RS, Saif LJ, Wang Q. 2017. Deletion of a 197-amino-acid region in the N-terminal domain of spike protein attenuates porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in piglets. J Virol 91:e00227-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00227-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Oka T, Saif LJ, Marthaler D, Esseili MA, Meulia T, Lin CM, Vlasova AN, Jung K, Zhang Y, Wang Q. 2014. Cell culture isolation and sequence analysis of genetically diverse US porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains including a novel strain with a large deletion in the spike gene. Vet Microbiol 173:258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bouhaddou M, Reuschl A-K, Polacco BJ, Thorne LG, Ummadi MR, Ye C, Rosales R, Pelin A, Batra J, Jang GM, et al. 2023. SARS-CoV-2 variants evolve convergent strategies to remodel the host response. Cell 186:4597–4614. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Johnson BA, Zhou Y, Lokugamage KG, Vu MN, Bopp N, Crocquet-Valdes PA, Kalveram B, Schindewolf C, Liu Y, Scharton D, Plante JA, Xie X, Aguilar P, Weaver SC, Shi PY, Walker DH, Routh AL, Plante KS, Menachery VD. 2022. Nucleocapsid mutations in SARS-CoV-2 augment replication and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 18:e1010627. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Serman T, Chiang C, Liu G, Sayyad Z, Pandey S, Volcic M, Lee H, Muppala S, Acharya D, Goins C, Stauffer SR, Sparrer KMJ, Gack MU. 2023. Acetylation of the NS3 helicase by KAT5γ is essential for flavivirus replication. Cell Host Microbe 31:1317–1330. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wu CY, Cheng CW, Kung CC, Liao KS, Jan JT, Ma C, Wong CH. 2022. Glycosite-deleted mRNA of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a broad-spectrum vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2119995119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2119995119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yang Q, Hughes TA, Kelkar A, Yu X, Cheng K, Park S, Huang WC, Lovell JF, Neelamegham S. 2020. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry upon blocking N- and O-glycan elaboration. Elife 9:e61552. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Huang HC, Lai YJ, Liao CC, Yang WF, Huang KB, Lee IJ, Chou WC, Wang SH, Wang LH, Hsu JM, Sun CP, Kuo CT, Wang J, Hsiao TC, Yang PJ, Lee TA, Huang W, Li FA, Shen CY, Lin YL, Tao MH, Li CW. 2021. Targeting conserved N-glycosylation blocks SARS-CoV-2 variant infection in vitro. EBioMedicine 74:103712. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang S, Liang Q, He X, Zhao C, Ren W, Yang Z, Wang Z, Ding Q, Deng H, Wang T, Zhang L, Wang X. 2022. Loss of Spike N370 glycosylation as an important evolutionary event for the enhanced infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res 32:315–318. doi: 10.1038/s41422-021-00600-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu Y, Wang B, Liang QZ, Shi FS, Ji CM, Yang XL, Yang YL, Qin P, Chen R, Huang YW. 2021. Roles of two major domains of the porcine deltacoronavirus S1 subunit in receptor binding and neutralization. J Virol 95:e0111821. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01118-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Li Q, Wu J, Nie J, Zhang L, Hao H, Liu S, Zhao C, Zhang Q, Liu H, Nie L, Qin H, Wang M, Lu Q, Li X, Sun Q, Liu J, Zhang L, Li X, Huang W, Wang Y. 2020. The impact of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike on viral infectivity and antigenicity. Cell 182:1284–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nurdin JA, Kotaki T, Kawagishi T, Sato S, Yamasaki M, Nouda R, Minami S, Kanai Y, Kobayashi T. 2023. N-Glycosylation of rotavirus NSP4 protein affects viral replication and pathogenesis. J Virol 97:e0186122. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01861-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Li W, Li H, Liu Y, Pan Y, Deng F, Song Y, Tang X, He Q. 2012. New variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, China, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1350–1353. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.120002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Guo J, Fang L, Ye X, Chen J, Xu S, Zhu X, Miao Y, Wang D, Xiao S. 2019. Evolutionary and genotypic analyses of global porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains. Transbound Emerg Dis 66:111–118. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Li Z, Ma Z, Han W, Chang C, Li Y, Guo X, Zheng Z, Feng Y, Xu L, Zheng H, Wang X, Xiao S. 2023. Deletion of a 7-amino-acid region in the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus envelope protein induces higher type I and III interferon responses and results in attenuation in vivo. J Virol 97:e0084723. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00847-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhang H, Zou C, Peng O, Ashraf U, Xu Q, Gong L, Fan B, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Xue C, Wei X, Zhou Q, Tian X, Shen H, Li B, Zhang X, Cao Y. 2023. Global dynamics of porcine enteric coronavirus PEDV epidemiology, evolution, and transmission. Mol Biol Evol 40:msad052. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Huang C-Y, Draczkowski P, Wang Y-S, Chang C-Y, Chien Y-C, Cheng Y-H, Wu Y-M, Wang C-H, Chang Y-C, Chang Y-C, Yang T-J, Tsai Y-X, Khoo K-H, Chang H-W, Hsu S-TD. 2022. In situ structure and dynamics of an alphacoronavirus spike protein by cryo-ET and cryo-EM. Nat Commun 13:4877. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32588-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Diep NV, Norimine J, Sueyoshi M, Lan NT, Yamaguchi R. 2017. Novel porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) variants with large deletions in the spike (S) gene coexist with PEDV strains possessing an intact S gene in domestic pigs in Japan: a new disease situation. PLoS One 12:e0170126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tsai KJ, Deng MC, Wang FI, Tsai SH, Chang C, Chang CY, Huang YL. 2020. Deletion in the S1 region of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus reduces the virulence and influences the virus-neutralizing activity of the antibody induced. Viruses 12:1378. doi: 10.3390/v12121378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li C, Li W, Lucio de Esesarte E, Guo H, van den Elzen P, Aarts E, van den Born E, Rottier PJM, Bosch B-J. 2017. Cell attachment domains of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein are key targets of neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 91:e00273-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00273-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chang CY, Cheng IC, Chang YC, Tsai PS, Lai SY, Huang YL, Jeng CR, Pang VF, Chang HW. 2019. Identification of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting novel conformational epitopes of the porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus spike protein. Sci Rep 9:2529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39844-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhang G, Peng Q, Liu S, Fan B, Wang C, Song X, Cao Q, Li C, Xu H, Lu H, Bao M, Yang S, Li Y, Wang J, Li B. 2024. The glycosylation sites in RBD of spike protein attenuate the immunogenicity of PEDV AH2012/12. Virus Res 345:199381. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Williams JA, Biancucci M, Lessen L, Tian S, Balsaraf A, Chen L, Chesterman C, Maruggi G, Vandepaer S, Huang Y, Mallett CP, Steff AM, Bottomley MJ, Malito E, Wahome N, Harshbarger WD. 2023. Structural and computational design of a SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen with improved expression and immunogenicity. Sci Adv 9:eadg0330. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Xu Y, Yan X, Wei T, Chen M, Zhu J, Gao J, Liu B, Zhu W, Liu Z. 2023. Transmucosal delivery of nasal nanovaccines enhancing mucosal and systemic immunity. Nano Lett 23:10522–10531. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chattha KS, Roth JA, Saif LJ. 2015. Strategies for design and application of enteric viral vaccines. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 3:375–395. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yuan C, Zhang P, Liu P, Li Y, Li J, Zhang E, Jin Y, Yang Q. 2022. A novel pathway for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus transmission from sows to neonatal piglets mediated by colostrum. J Virol 96:e0047722. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00477-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Deng X, Buckley AC, Pillatzki A, Lager KM, Faaberg KS, Baker SC. 2020. Inactivating three interferon antagonists attenuates pathogenesis of an enteric coronavirus. J Virol 94:e00565-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00565-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jiao Y, Zhao P, Xu LD, Yu JQ, Cai HL, Zhang C, Tong C, Yang YL, Xu P, Sun Q, Chen N, Wang B, Huang YW. 2024. Enteric coronavirus nsp2 is a virulence determinant that recruits NBR1 for autophagic targeting of TBK1 to diminish the innate immune response. Autophagy 20:1762–1779. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2024.2340420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lu Y, Cai H, Lu M, Ma Y, Li A, Gao Y, Zhou J, Gu H, Li J, Gu J. 2020. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus deficient in RNA cap guanine-N-7 methylation is attenuated and induces higher type I and III interferon responses. J Virol 94:e00447-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00447-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Li Z, Ma Z, Dong L, Yang T, Li Y, Jiao D, Han W, Zheng H, Xiao S. 2022. Molecular mechanism of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus cell tropism. MBio 13:e0373921. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03739-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated during the current study are included in the article.


Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES