Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0317821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317821

The impact of clergy sexual abuse on spirituality and health: A systematic scoping review of the literature

Joanne Durkin 1,*,#, Rachel Zordan 2,3,#, Matthew Bullen 4,, Nadia Pavich 1,, Patricia Therese Benedict Thomas 5,, Carolyn Lethborg 6,7,#, Wendy Holder 8,, Melinda Jolly 9,, Darlene Dreise 1,, Daniel Fleming 1,10,#
Editor: Stefano Federici11
PMCID: PMC12002452  PMID: 40238787

Abstract

Sexual abuse perpetrated by clergy or other Church leaders can cause harm to the spirituality of people who are subject to this abuse, which also has impacts on their overall health. We conducted a systematic scoping review to examine how Spiritual Harm in this context is operationalized in the literature with specific reference to the Catholic Church. Literature searches were conducted across Academic Search Complete, Informit Database, ProQuest, Web of Science and Google Scholar in 2022 and updated throughout 2023. Eligible studies were published between 2002–2022 and included peer reviewed empirical research, systematic reviews, discussion, or perspective papers that explored spiritual and/or religious harm and sexual abuse in a church context, and the psychological, emotional, and spiritual impact of the abuse. The review included 12 research articles. Data were analysed using qualitative approaches and presented as a narrative summary. Reporting follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Spiritual Harm in people who are subject to clerical sexual abuse is understood as a distinct condition or phenomena, comprising of complex spiritual, emotional and psychological components. However, it is not consistently defined. Understanding Spiritual Harm in a more comprehensive and consistent way is important in order to be able to adequately respond to the needs of victims, survivors, their families and wider communities.

1. Introduction

There are long term psychological, emotional and physical health consequences for people who have experienced sexual abuse [13]. These consequences are related to the perpetration of harm against the person and to post-trauma stress associated with the abuse [4]. As such, this kind of abuse is often a source of enduring trauma, having a profoundly negative impact on the person, their self-identity [5], their family and wider community [4,6] which can endure across a lifetime [7].

In addition to these well-established consequences of sexual abuse, when such abuse is perpetrated by clergy or other religious leaders it is often referred to as a form of spiritual abuse [8] which causes a Spiritual Harm, adding to the complex nature of resulting trauma. Such harm is related to but distinguishable from the well-established psychological, emotional and physical health consequences noted above. Furthermore, some argue that this Spiritual Harm is further compounded when, upon disclosing clerical sexual abuse, a survivor is not believed, or treated poorly as a result of their disclosure, which has been a consistent feature of responses to abuse in Catholic Church contexts [1,6,8,9]. Whilst abuse is widespread across many religious communities [10,11], in this review we focus on the experience within the Catholic Church (hereafter, the Church) in particular. This focus reflects the wide scale of abuse in the Church [12] and its unique social and theological context [13], which a number of commentators suggest are contributing factors both to the occurrence of abuse and the trauma that follows it [14].

Even though there is agreement among commentators regarding the damage to a person’s spirituality [8,15] when sexual abuse is perpetrated by a religious authority, the term ‘Spiritual Harm’ (and other synonyms used in the literature) is beset with a lack of conceptual clarity. We argue that addressing this gap is necessary to move research in this area forward: without clarity in defining Spiritual Harm, it is difficult to create responses orientated towards healing [16]. Correlatively, accurately describing harm in cases of complex trauma creates conditions of possibility for genuinely therapeutic responses [17].

In view of the current limitations in the literature and an emerging notion that addressing the trauma of survivors of clerical sexual abuse involves addressing their spirituality [1820], and the prevalence of and particularity of this harm within the Catholic Church [14] we determined that a systematic scoping review of the literature was needed to understand how the term and associated concepts were being operationalized in contemporary academic literature.

2. Background and focus of the review

This study was initiated as part of a broader project in which was commissioned by a health care service in Australia. The central goal of the project is addressing the harm experienced by survivors of sexual abuse in the Church within health and spiritual care contexts. The project is supported by the Trauma Informed Spiritual Care Initiative Advisory (hereafter, the Advisory) which is comprised of clinicians, experts in trauma informed care, and individuals with lived experience of sexual abuse in the Church.

In the early stages of the project, the Advisory’s engagement with literature revealed a lack of conceptual clarity in relation to spiritual harm when related to sexual abuse by religious authorities, particularly in a Church setting. This literature review formalizes our attention to that specific gap. Given this, our focus is narrowly defined as the spiritual harm that survivors experience when they have been subjected to sexual abuse in Church contexts. We recognize that spiritual harm can occur in other contexts (e.g., in familial contexts). We also recognize that there are many spiritual, psychological and emotional characteristics present for sexual assault survivors who are not abused by clergy and/or Church leaders. Notwithstanding that these are important areas for study in their own right, they are outside the scope of the present study.

3. The current review

We conducted a systematic scoping review of existing literature describing Spiritual Harm in the context of sexual abuse in a Church setting. The aim of this scoping review was to examine its nature and associated spiritual, psychological and emotional characteristics of the term. The review had two specific research questions: (1) how is this Spiritual Harm operationalized in the available literature? and; (2) what are the key characteristics related to this Spiritual Harm?

4. Positionality

The research team comprised members of the Advisory. JD is the project officer and health researcher, DF is the project lead, a theologian and ethicist. Professional backgrounds of the authors include psychology practice and research (WH and RZ), pastoral and/or spiritual care (MB, PT, NP, MJ), social work practice and research (CL), and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health, wellbeing and Reconciliation programs (MJ and DD). Some authors have lived experienced of sexual abuse in a Church context as survivors and some support survivors of sexual assault through their research, and/or advocacy for victims and survivors but have not experienced this harm themselves. All authors have experience of Catholicism either through their current or past experiences as members of the Catholic community, their spiritual practices, or their experiences in employment or education. Throughout this review, all authors had open dialogue about their professional, personal and spiritual experiences and considered the influence this had on understanding and decisions regarding the reporting of results. These conversations helped us to understand potential biases and blind spots in relation to the scoping review. Collectively, the authors agreed to adhere to the original protocol, clearly and transparently document all processes undertaken in order to minimise the potential for undue influence based in personal perspectives. The authors took every precaution to mitigate against personal perspectives having an undue influence on the reporting of results.

5. Methods

We designed and tested a protocol for a systematic scoping review [21] prior to commencing the study. This determined that the methodology was appropriate to understand how a concept was conceptualized, defined and operationalized [22]. The protocol for this review was based on the approach that Coffey et al. [23] used to investigate the term ‘eco-anxiety’ which similarly sought to answer questions related to operationalization and key characteristics of a term related to subjective experience. The present systematic scoping review is reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [21] (See S1 File. PRISMA-SCR Checklist).

6. Search strategy development and data sources

The search was conducted in three stages (1) initial test searching of relevant databases to analyze search terms and key words, (2) keywords identified from the initial test searches used in a revised search strategy in all databases, and (3) reference lists of key returns mined for suitable keywords. The initial test searches were conducted August-September 2022 in ProQuest and Academic Search Complete. This initial test search identified that various terms are used to discuss the spiritual component to the harm caused by sexual abuse in a religious context. These range from, but are not limited, to spiritual harm, spiritual damage, spiritual wounding, spiritual trauma, spiritual disconnection, dissociation, spiritual rape, and soul murder. The search strategy was further developed in consultation with the Advisory to ensure key concepts were captured. The search strategy was finalized in November 2022 and conducted in Academic Search Complete, Informit Database, ProQuest and Web of Science. An adapted search was also conducted in Google Scholar and the first 100 returns were screened. The search terms included: (spiritual or religion) AND (harm or abuse or trauma) AND (clerical OR clergy OR church OR religio * OR cathol*). English language restrictions were applied to the databases with a search period from January 2002 to November 2022. Initially, we sought contemporary literature in a 10-year timeframe. Due to the limited number of papers available, this was extended to 20 years.

The final searches were completed on the 22 November 2022. A sample search string with limiters is provided in Table 1. A full list of all database searches with exact search strings, limiters, and action taken is included in S2 File. Database Searches.

Table 1. Example of a search string.

Search String: spiritual * OR religio * OR devout OR spiritual * OR religio * OR devout; harm OR abuse OR trauma * OR damage OR abuse OR trauma * AND clerical OR clergy OR church OR religio * OR cathol*) AND AB (clerical OR clergy OR church OR religio * OR cathol * 
Limiters Date 2002 – 2022; English Language;

7. Search outcomes

A search of databases identified n = 631 articles of which 201 were identified as duplicates through an automated process using Endnote X9 [24] and manual identification by JD. The remaining n = 430 articles were reviewed for relevance and a further n = 368 were deemed unrelated in any way to the topic under investigation and removed by JD after discussion with co-authors. The process of title and abstract screening of the n = 430 articles was conducted in Endnote X9 initially, before 62 articles were imported into COVIDENCE [25] where two authors (JD and RZ) conducted title and abstract screening independently. Of the records (n = 62) screened, n = 23 were excluded at title and abstract screening. The remaining n = 39 studies were independently assessed by two authors (JD and DF) against the full exclusion and exclusion criteria outlined in Table 2. In total, n = 12 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Handsearching of the references in the 12 included articles yielded no further papers. The process is documented in the PRISMA flow Chart (see Fig 1). Throughout 2023, the authors continued to update the searches to identify any additional papers that may be included in the review that may have been published between November 2022 and November 2023. No additional papers were identified or included in this review.

Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
  • Empirical research; systematic reviews; discussion papers, perspective papers

  • Quantitative, observational, qualitative and mixed methods studies

  • Spiritual and/or religious harm is examined in the context of sexual abuse in a Catholic Church context

  • Article discusses trauma, mental health, and related outcomes

  • Contains concept of psychological and/or emotional state when related to Spiritual Harm

  • Published between January 2002 – October 2022

  • English Language

  • Spiritual and/or religious harm in the context of sexual abuse by religious authority in the Church is not:

  • specifically addressed, or;

  • addressed as a particular harm, or;

  • is not the focus of the article/paper.

  • Letters to the editor; book chapters or reviews, trade publications; periodicals, news items, conference abstracts

  • No explicit empirical, theoretical, or practical focus in relation to Spiritual Harm and sexual abuse or associated concepts.

Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart.

Fig 1

8. Data charting; extraction, analysis and reporting of results

The first author (JD) imported n = 12 articles into NVIVO v12 Plus software [26] and data extracted under ‘Nodes’ that mapped to the extraction form developed in the study protocol. Extraction fields included author/year, publication type, sample (if appropriate), definitions of Spiritual Harm and/or alternative descriptors of Spiritual Harm, key components as described in the literature, psychological and emotional components associated with Spiritual Harm, sample characteristics, measures used and recommendations and/or calls for further research. Author JD completed initial extraction of data in NVIVO. A presentation of this extracted data was given by JD to the Advisory in February 2023, after which all authors were sent a summary table of the full extraction along with a link to the full paper for review. Each author reviewed 2–3 papers independently and provided comment on salient points. The key points identified by the Advisory were compared against the extracted findings to ensure that the Advisory’s contribution had been captured in full. Qualitative data were then consolidated into categories in order to ensure the research aims were fulfilled [27]. Categories included how the term was being operationalized in the literature then what the spiritual, emotional and psychological components of spiritual harm. Further categorization related to descriptors of the impact of the harm, conceptual notes and information relating to the act of abuse or perpetration of spiritual harm was also captured and presented. A summary of this data is presented in S3 File. Operationalising SH in the Literature. To illustrate the frequency of terms used to describe Spiritual Harm and associated concepts and provide a visual representation of important terms and key concepts, all extracted data was imported into https://worditout.com/ to create a word cloud (See Fig 2). Quality appraisal was not undertaken which is consistent current methodological guidelines related to conducting scoping reviews [21,22,28].

Fig 2. Word cloud highlighting the broad range of vocabulary and phrases in the included literature to illustrate the various concepts relating to Spiritual Harm.

Fig 2

9. Results of the review

9.1. Characteristics of included studies

Table 3 presents a summary of key characteristics of the studies included in this scoping review. Of 12 included studies, 5 were discursive and/or position pieces [8,15,2931], with two position papers based on analysis of secondary documents [32,33]. Empirical studies comprised cross-sectional quantitative study (n = 1) [34], mixed method analysis of secondary documents (n = 1) [35], systematic literature review (n = 1) [36] and a thesis using quantitative methods (n = 1) [37]. One study interviewed people who have firsthand lived experience of abuse by Roman Catholic priests or religious [38]. The total participant sample in all included empirical studies was n = 123.

Table 3. Included studies with characteristics.

Author/Year Country Title Concept focus Aims/ objective of paper/ study Type of contribution/research Sample Measures used
Benkert & Doyle [29] United States of America Clericalism, Religious Duress and its Psychological Impact on Victims of Clergy Sexual Abuse. Religious duress Discussion paper/ Aims not stated. Discursive paper n/a
Bland [37] United States of America The psychological and spiritual effects of child sexual abuse when the perpetrator is a Catholic priest. Spiritual Injury To explore the negative, long-term psychological and spiritual effects of child sexual abuse when the perpetrator was a Catholic priest. Thesis Survivors n = 73 of childhood clerical sexual abuse Religiosity Index, Spiritual Injury Scale; Trauma Symptom Checklist-40 (TSC-40); Sexual Abuse History and Healing Questionnaire.
Doyle [8] United States of America The Spiritual Trauma Experienced by Victims of Sexual Abuse by Catholic Clergy. Spiritual Trauma This article examines some of the symptoms and possible recovery from the spiritual dimension of post abuse trauma. Discursive paper n/a
Ellis et al., [36] United States of America Religious/spiritual abuse and trauma: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Religious/ Spiritual Abuse and Trauma To provide an overview of the extant empirical research that has been conducted on religious/spiritual abuse or trauma. Literature review n/a
Farrell, [38] United Kingdom Sexual abuse perpetrated by Roman Catholic priests and religious. Theological Trauma The focus of the research was upon the unique, subjective experience of a participant’s understanding and awareness, of encountering an abusive sexual experience perpetrated by either a cleric or a religious. Data were collected via a face-to-face semi structured interview n = 12 individuals who had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic priests or religious (PTSD-QAI) (Farrell, Keenan, & Taylor, 2003) based upon the DSM-IV TR (2000) classification for PTSD. Idiosyncratic Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) (Farrell & Taylor, 2003)
Guido, [30] United States of America A Unique Betrayal: Clergy Sexual Abuse in the Context of the Catholic Religious Tradition. Spiritual and religious abuse Discussion paper/aims not stated Discursive paper n/a
McPhillips [32] Australia Silence, Secrecy and Power: Understanding the Royal Commission Findings into the Failure of Religious Organisations to Protect Spiritual Harm Provide background and context to the establishment of the Royal Commission, Overview of the Commission’s methodology investigation Analyse the outcomes of that investigation Discursive/position paper; Analysis of outcomes related to the Royal Commission (Australia) n/a
Novsak et al., [31] Slovenia Therapeutic implications of religious-related emotional abuse. Religious related emotional abuse To discuss the emotional repercussions of religious-related abuse in the family. Discursive n/a
Pargament et al., [15] United States of America Problem and Solution: The Spiritual Dimension of Clergy Sexual Abuse and its Impact on Survivors. Spiritual Dimension of Clergy Sexual Abuse To understand the spiritual dimension of clergy-perpetrated sexual abuse. Discursive n/a
Pereda & Segura [34] Spain Child Sexual Abuse Within the Roman Catholic Church in Spain: A Descriptive Study of Abuse Characteristics, Victims’ Faith, and Spirituality. Spiritual damage To examine adult victims of child sexual abuse by representatives of the Spanish Catholic Church. Cross sectional study design sample comprised n = 38 adults Questionnaire
Spraitz & Bowen [35] United States of America Religious Duress and Reverential Fear in Clergy Sexual Abuse Cases: Examination of Victims’ Reports and Recommendations for Change. Religious Duress and Reverential Fear The discussion focuses on why victims remain silent and provides recommendations for new policy and for improving existing policy. Mixed method; secondary analysis of documents n = 16/18 priest files. Qualitative retrospective content analysis
McPhillips [33] Australia “Soul Murder”: Investigating Spiritual Trauma at
the Royal Commission
Spiritual Trauma This article examines existing research on spiritual trauma with regard to child sexual abuse. Discursive/position paper; Analysis of secondary source Applies a five-point classification model developed by Kenneth Pargament and colleagues [15] for identifying and analysing spiritual damage.

The majority of authors were from the United States of America (n = 7) [8,15,29,30,3537], followed by Australia (n = 2) [32,33], the United Kingdom (n = 1) [38]; and further papers originating from Spain (n = 1) [34], and Slovenia (n = 1) [31]. None of the included papers examined Spiritual Harm and sexual abuse against children by religious authority from an Indigenous perspective.

9.2. Operationalization of Spiritual Harm in the literature

Within the reviewed literature, Spiritual Harm is described or understood in terms of the method or way in which the abuse was perpetrated against a person, contributing factors that enabled the abuse to be perpetrated and/or the effect on a person experience following the abuse. Authors variably describe the concept as a Spiritual Harm [32], a Spiritual Trauma [8,33], Religious Distress [29], Spiritual Injury [37], Spiritual Trauma [8], Religious/Spiritual Abuse and Trauma [36], Theological Trauma [38], and Spiritual Damage [34]. Further articles focused specifically on the Spiritual Dimension of Clergy Sexual Abuse [15] and the concept of Religious Duress and Reverential Fear that empowered the abuse [35].

In our review we found that the term Spiritual Harm and associated concepts are broadly operationalized as multifaced and complex. Common elements in the definitions or description of the term are the manipulation of religious practices to enable grooming, abuse and ongoing control of victims. Description of concepts include reference to the act of abuse (e.g., the use of religious practice or position to sexually, physically, psychologically and/or emotionally abuse another), the enablers that allowed the abuse to occur (e.g., power, position, and fear), the effect or impact of the resultant abuse perpetrated against the individual, the family and wider community (e.g., spiritual, emotional and psychological impact), the changes in behavior exhibited by people subjected to abuse (e.g., negative impact on person and relationship with God or their Church community) or the loss they experience. S3 File outlines the key terms used to operationalize Spiritual Harm in the extant literature.

We note that it was consistently the case that no explicit definition of ‘Spiritual Harm’ is offered by authors of included studies in this review. However, we found that papers provided clear descriptions of the act of spiritual abuse or the resulting impact the acts of harm had on a individuals’ spirituality, religious attendance, and practice. Conceptually, Spiritual Harm was described in varying ways across studies [36] and was a complex concept [31]. Despite descriptions of the emotional and psychological harms associated with the concept, Spiritual Harm was understood to be a phenomenon in its own right [33]. Fig 2 provides a word cloud highlighting the broad range of vocabulary and phrases to illustrate the various concepts relating to Spiritual Harm.

In what follows, we distinguish between the way in which the concept is operationalized in terms of its spiritual, emotional and psychological features

9.3. Spiritual components and impact of Spiritual Harm

In our review we found that Spiritual Harm is understood as a devastation of the spiritual aspects of a person [8,29,33] that has long-term negative spiritual effects [8,37]. These effects include feeling distant from or cut-off completely from God [33,36], being in conflict with God [38], a belief that God has violated [29,30,33] or abandoned the individual who has been abused [8,29], and/or a sense that God treated them unfairly by not preventing their suffering [37]. Sexual abuse in this context is often framed as being commissioned by a representative of God and thereby understood as an attack on the soul of the person [8,29], an attack on the core self or identity [33,36] and an attack on a person’s sacramental worldview [30,33]. Guido [30] explains the particularity of this harm in the context of the Church: “Precisely because the priest is regarded by Catholics as an alter Christus, another Christ, his violation of a child’s or adolescent’s body is also a violation of a sacred trust and worldview” (p. 255). Spiritual Harm can also result in moral confusion [29] and considerable theological and existential struggles [8].The individual may feel that the central tools for making sense of themselves and their world that faith provided has been taken from them [8,30,33,38]. Spiritual harm is also described as a deep despair at the loss of relationship with God, often a foundational element of a religious person’s experience of the world and their understanding of their purpose, value, vocation and communal identity [39], leaving the person isolated and alone as their relationship with God is ruptured and irreparable [8]. This can confiscate any spiritual coping mechanisms a person may have possessed individually and/or through community prior to their abuse [37].

The abuse also has dramatic consequences for religious observance [33,37] causing a distrust of religion and religious communities [33,36]. A person may experience an inability to pray, attend religious service and/or engage in the sacraments [8,30,32,33,38] which in turn robs these central elements of religious practice of their attendant meaning [30]. While individuals who have experienced Spiritual Harm are sometimes drawn to engage or re-engage with religious practice [33,36], they can be re-traumatized if they disclose abuse to family and religious community, particularly if the response is not supportive, compounding the Spiritual Harm and leaving them empty, lost and fearful [8,38].

9.4. Psychological components of Spiritual Harm

Our review also found that Spiritual Harm is bound together with psychological implications [8] which include an array of post-traumatic stress symptoms [33] such as anxiety and depression [8,15,36,37], panic attacks and other anxiety reactions, particularly when a survivor is in proximity to a church [29], sleep disturbances [30,37], sexual problems [37], and numbness and immobility which distorts their sense of reality [29] and a debilitating loss of independent functional status [15].

The psychological impact of Spiritual Harm is identified as causing indescribable pain that may confuse and psychologically overwhelm the individual, rendering them incapable of processing the sexual abuse [8,29]. Furthermore, it has serious impacts on a person’s agency, wellbeing [32] and long-term health outcomes [33]. Often, survivors of abuse were prevented from disclosing their abuse for a prolonged period because of fear of repercussions, guilt or shame [8,29]. Left without coping strategies and protective mechanisms otherwise available to them [8,29,37], survivors of abuse may engage in maladaptive coping strategies to survive [36]. These can include avoidance and dissociative behaviours [30], risky sexual behaviours [15,36], substance use and misuse [15], self-injurious behaviours [36] or suicidality [15,33].

9.5. Emotional components of Spiritual Harm

Our review also found that Spiritual Harm is understood as having significant adverse emotional components [36] that can be devastating and cause profound distress [8,32,38]. Feelings of deep anger towards their abuser and the Church are core emotional components [8,29,30,33,38] which have a significant negative impact on the person. Individuals may experience feelings of toxic guilt and immobilizing fear, both because of the abuse and their inability to disclose what happened to them [8,29,35,37]. Spiritual Harm is also understood as bound together with an emotional trauma and betrayal [33,36], emotional manipulation, or emotional pain, which can render the person incapable of protecting and promoting their own emotional growth and spiritual well-being [8,29]. Feeling a loss of trust in institutions and others is also reported [15,32,33,36] as are feelings of abandonment [8,38] and an acute and debilitating emptiness [8,29]. As outlined by Doyle [8]:

“Those who have been sexually assaulted by Catholic clergy or religious have experienced spiritual trauma as well as emotional and psychological trauma. The impact on the soul is often subtle and grows more painful and debilitating as time passes. Many survivors have said that this spiritual pain has been worse than the emotional pain.” (p. 240)

9.6. Measurement tools

Measurement tools used in the investigation into Spiritual Harm and associated concepts included the Spiritual Injury Scale [37]; Religiosity Index [37]; Sexual abuse History and Healing Questionnaire [37]. Other measurement tools included the use of The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder QAI (PTSD-QAI) [38,40] and Idiosyncratic Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) [38].

9.7. Identified gaps and further research directions

Within the studies included in this scoping review, we extracted both calls for further research and the authors’ suggestions for improvements and changes to support offered to people who have experienced Spiritual Harm and abuse in the Church. Authors identified a need for further research into the psychological and spiritual functioning of people who had been sexually abused in a religious context [34,36,37], noting specifically the need to understand unique spiritual context within which the abuse occurred [34,38]. There were calls for comparison of outcomes based on gender of the person who experienced abuse [34,37], as well as calls to understand the difference between clerical or religious-related sexual abuse and other types of abuse, e.g., familial abuse [36]. The need to improve the measures used to assess Religious and Spiritual Abuse and Harm and to develop alternative measures to understand Religious and Spiritual Abuse and Harm was identified [36]. The importance of improving the diagnosis of such harm and understanding its impact on psychological and spiritual functioning for people who experienced clerical sexual abuse was also identified [38], as was the need to understand whether spiritual healing can aid psychological and emotional healing [37].

Studies included in this review found that care givers responding to Spiritual Harm need to understand the sacramental culture of Catholicism [30,33] in order to more comprehensively understand the harm. Further, there were calls for care givers to attend to the spiritual dimension of the harm and consider spirituality as a possible source for healing as well as the source of the harm [15,33]. Some authors proposed that redress processes for survivors of sexual abuse by clergy need to include spiritual restitution and recovery of those affected [32,33], with calls for religious organisations to collaborate in the spiritual healing process for survivors [33,34]. It was noted that initiatives sponsored by the Church tend not to explore the effect of abuse on survivors of sexual violence in a Church context, nor include substantial efforts to find ways to provide effective assistance and healing [8,33].

10. Discussion

The aim of this scoping review was to examine the literature describing Spiritual Harm in the context of sexual abuse in a Church context, to understand how the term is operationalized, and understand the key characteristics used the describe the concept. The key findings from our scoping review reveal a lack of clarity in both operationalization and conceptualization of Spiritual Harm, particularly in relation to sexual abuse in the Church [41,42]. The review identified that a range of terms overlay Spiritual Harm with trauma, distress, injury, and damage. We found various interpretations of the harm itself being primarily religious or spiritual. Conceptually, there was a lack of clarity around the use of the term as a descriptor of a form of abuse, a form of harm, the enablers that allowed abuse or harm to be perpetrated, and/or the resultant effect or impact of the changes or loss a person experienced as a result of being subjected to the abuse. In light of this, we note that concepts that are left unexamined can inadvertently become substitutions for other terms [43], and lack of linguistic precision has a detrimental impact both on selection and operationalization of definitions of research, and the ability to compare empirical results [4446] which prevent advancement of research in the field. The scoping review demonstrated that much of the literature includes discursive and/or position papers from those working with or close to people who have experienced Spiritual Harm. We acknowledge it is important to recognize the work of advocates who speak for the person who has been subjected to harm. That said, we suggest that if we are to advance understanding of Spiritual Harm, more research that focusses on first-person accounts are critical and researchers in this field must continue to focus on listening to and partnering with survivors to create opportunities for research.

Further key findings from our scoping review found that Spiritual Harm can be understood as binding together spiritual, emotional and psychological components. We found a limited number of measures for assessing the Spiritual Harm caused by sexual abuse in a Church context. The development of consistently applied methodologies to measure the emotional, psychological and spiritual components of the Spiritual Harm are important if we are to advance our understanding of the concept. Furthermore, the use of validated scales of measurement are an important step in advancing any field [47]. Existing measures addressing the psychological and emotional components of Spiritual Harm, for example depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, may be useful. However, a robust understanding of the complexity and the context in which the harm occurred (e.g., within the Church by a representative of God) is critical to grasping Spiritual Harm more comprehensively for survivors of abuse within the Church. In other words, sexual abuse in the context of the Church creates a harm comprised of many features, which include the particularities of context. Spiritual Harm can cause a moral confusion and burden, intense and complex shame, culminating in a rupturing or severing of a person’s relationship with their Spiritual self and/or God. Although not explicitly defined in the literature, this maps to the definition of a complex harm or trauma which is widely recognized in other fields.

Our scoping review highlights the need for clearer conceptualization of Spiritual Harm in the context of sexual abuse within the Church when conducting research. Through further research, we may better understand the complicated nature of Spiritual Harm and offer an appropriate remedy and treatment for individuals who, through no fault of their own, have borne an enormous and complex burden as a result of the abuse perpetrated against them.

11. Limitations and future research directions

This review was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in academic journals to allow for a focus on how this concept is understood in the contemporary literature. A review of books, grey literature, reports and evidence from other sources may yield important findings on the topic of Spiritual Harm and sexual abuse in a Church context. This review was also limited to papers published in English.

This review was limited to Spiritual Harm and associated concepts in the context of sexual abuse in a Church context. Further research could explore the concept of spiritual and/or religious harm in other contexts and yield useful results, particularly in comparison to Church contexts. The review identified that there is an opportunity for further research with victims and survivors of sexual abuse in other religious and/or faith settings. Such a review may uncover comparisons and contrasts between abuse suffered within the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations and other religions, as well as spiritual communities and cults, however this was not our particular focus.

Most studies included in this review drew on the perspectives of researchers and those working in the field who spoke on behalf of victims and survivors. We recognize these researchers were speaking on behalf of those who may be unable to tell their story. Research methodology needs to evolve to create safe spaces for victims and survivors if they are to be actively involved and their voices heard. Placing a trauma-informed lens on all aspects of research may facilitate the involvement of diverse, marginalized and/or underrepresented groups.

The lack of conceptual clarity on the concept of Spiritual Harm and/or abuse provides an opportunity for further research. Researchers are encouraged to provide clear definitions of terms, e.g., harm or abuse as direct action or resultant state of victim/survivor. We identified that there is a need for a therapeutic response focused on spiritual healing alongside psychological and emotional healing. Failure to acknowledge the spiritual component of the harm and/or abuse will not lead to a full understanding of the wounding victims and survivors have suffered. Clinicians and others in the helping professions need to recognize and treat disorders when present and a cause of significant morbidity or mortality. Given these gaps, Spiritual Harm is largely unrecognized, unaddressed, and therefore left untreated – as was the case of Disorder Grief which was first identified in early 1990. It is now recognized as Prolonged Grief Disorder and included in the latest edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [48]. Our hope is that an advancement of understanding and conceptual clarity of Spiritual Harm could lead to similar developments in this area of profound need, and lead to a future in which survivors are able to gain more effective acknowledgement, treatment, and healing.

12. Conclusions

The scoping review found that Spiritual Harm is understood in the literature as a distinct condition or phenomena that is comprised of complex spiritual, emotional and psychological components. People who have experienced sexual abuse in a Church context often experience deep pain and ongoing suffering. The scoping review found that there is a need to develop our understanding of Spiritual Harm if we are to adequately respond to the needs of victims, survivors, their families and wider communities and provide genuine, holistic support. This review identified that treating a Spiritual Harm as a purely psychological and/or emotional harm is an incomplete response to the trauma carried by survivors and victims. While there are psychological and emotional components of this type of harm, these are bound together with the the spiritual harm experienced by survivors. Attending to only some aspects of harm is detrimental for the overall effectiveness of any response. As such, further research is essential to develop evidence-based strategies for responding to the needs of survivors and must address both the spiritual components of the harm and the particularity of the context within which the abuse occurred (. in this case, within the framework set by the theology, practice and authority structures of the Church).

If we are to respond to the needs of people who have been subjected to a Spiritual Harm as a result of sexual abuse in a Church context, we need to develop our understanding of this complicated harm.

Supporting information

S1 File. PRISMA-SCR checklist.

(PDF)

pone.0317821.s001.pdf (498.3KB, pdf)
S2 File. Database searches.

(DOCX)

pone.0317821.s002.docx (20.8KB, docx)
S3 File. Operationalising SH in the literature.

(DOCX)

pone.0317821.s003.docx (31.9KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This project is funded by the Health Equity Grant St Vincent's Health Australia. We confirm that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hailes HP, Yu R, Danese A, Fazel S. Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: An umbrella review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(10):830–9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30286-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Irish L, Kobayashi I, Delahanty DL. Long-term physical health consequences of childhood sexual abuse: A meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(5):450–61. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Briere JN, Elliott DM. Immediate and long-term impacts of child sexual abuse. Future Child. 1994;4(2):54–69. doi: 10.2307/1602523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wright K, Swain S, McPhillips K. The Australian royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;74:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Easton SD, Leone-Sheehan DM, O’Leary PJ. “I Will Never Know the Person Who I Could Have Become”: Perceived changes in self-identity among adult survivors of clergy-perpetrated sexual abuse. J Interpers Violence. 2016;34(6):1139–62. doi: 10.1177/0886260516650966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McGraw DM, Ebadi M, Dalenberg C, Wu V, Naish B, Nunez L. Consequences of abuse by religious authorities: A review. Traumatology. 2019;25(4):242–55. doi: 10.1037/trm0000183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prusak J, Schab A. Spiritual trauma as a manifestation of religious and spiritual struggles in female victims of sexual abuse in adolescence or young adulthood in the Catholic Church in Poland. Arch Psycho Relig. 2022;44(1):40–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doyle TP. The spiritual trauma experienced by victims of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy. Pastoral Psychol. 2008;58(3):239–60. doi: 10.1007/s11089-008-0187-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McLaughlin BR. Devastated spirituality: The impact of clergy sexual abuse on the survivor’s relationship with god and the church. Sex Addict Compuls. 1994;1(2):145–58. doi: 10.1080/10720169408400039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rosmarin DH, Pirutinsky S, Appel M, Kaplan T, Pelcovitz D. Childhood sexual abuse, mental health, and religion across the Jewish community. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;81:21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lusky-Weisrose E, Kowalski M, Tener D, Katz C. child sexual abuse by religious authority figures in Germany and Israel: The experiences and perceptions of adult survivors. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(23–24):NP21749–74. doi: 10.1177/08862605211062997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hunt GR, Mathews B, Higgins DJ, Finkelhor D, Willis ML, Haslam DM, et al. The prevalence of child sexual abuse perpetrated by leaders or other adults in religious organizations in Australia. Child Abuse Negl. 2024;155:106946. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Keenan JF. Hierarchicalism. Theological Studies. 2022;83(1):84–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fleming D, Keenan J, Zollner H. Doing theology and theological ethics in the face of the abuse crisis. 2023.
  • 15.Pargament KI, Murray-Swank NA, Mahoney A. Problem and solution: the spiritual dimension of clergy sexual abuse and its impact on survivors. J Child Sex Abus. 2008;17(3–4):397–420. doi: 10.1080/10538710802330187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kenny N. Healing the church: Diagnosing and treating the clergy sexual abuse crisis. 2012.
  • 17.Hudson P, Remedios C, Zordan R, Thomas K, Clifton D, Crewdson M, et al. Guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(6):696–702. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kenny N. Clergy sexual abuse, trauma-informed theology and the promotion of resilience. Doing theology and theological ethics in the face of the abuse crisis. 2023;3:360–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jackson-Meyer KA. Clergy abuse truth and reconciliation commission. J Moral Theol. 2023;3:230–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mescher M. Clergy Sexual Abuse as Moral Injury: Confronting a Wounded and Wounding Church. J Moral Theol. 2023;3(CTEWC Book Series 3). doi: 10.55476/001c.72061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–26. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coffey Y, Bhullar N, Durkin J, Islam MS, Usher K. Understanding eco-anxiety: A systematic scoping review of current literature and identified knowledge gaps. J Clim Change Health. 2021;3:100047. doi: 10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The EndNote Team. EndNote. EndNote 20 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Covidence. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2021. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lumivero. NVivo. Lumivero; 2023. Available from: https://lumivero.com/products/nvivo/ [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):520–32. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Benkert M, Doyle TP. Clericalism, religious duress and its psychological impact on victims of clergy sexual abuse. Pastoral Psychol. 2009;58(3):223–38. doi: 10.1007/s11089-008-0188-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guido JJ. A unique betrayal: Clergy sexual abuse in the context of the catholic religious tradition. J Child Sex Abus. 2008;17(3–4):255–69. doi: 10.1080/10538710802329775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Novšak R, Mandelj TR, Simonič B. Therapeutic implications of religious-related emotional abuse. J Aggress, Maltreat & Trauma. 2012;21(1):31–44. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2011.627914 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McPhillips K. Silence, secrecy and power: understanding the royal commission findings into the failure of religious organisations to protect children. J Acad Stud Religion. 2018;31(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McPhillips K. “Soul Murder”: Investigating spiritual trauma at the royal commission. J Aus Stud. 2018;42(2):231–42. doi: 10.1080/14443058.2018.1458329 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pereda N, Segura A. Child sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in Spain: A descriptive study of abuse characteristics, victims’ faith, and spirituality. Psychol Violence. 2021;11(5):488–96. doi: 10.1037/vio0000390 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Spraitz J, Bowen K. Religious duress and reverential fear in clergy sexual abuse cases: Examination of victims’ reports and recommendations for change. Crim Just Policy Rev. 2020.;1:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ellis HM, Hook JN, Zuniga S, Hodge AS, Ford KM, Davis DE, et al. Religious/spiritual abuse and trauma: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Spiritual Clin Pract. 2022;9(4):213–31. doi: 10.1037/scp0000301 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bland MJ. The psychological and spiritual effects of child sexual abuse when the perpetrator is a Catholic priest. Online: The Chicago School o f Professional Psychology; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Farrell DP. Sexual abuse perpetrated by Roman Catholic priests and religious. Ment Health, Relig & Cult. 2009;12(1):39–53. doi: 10.1080/13674670802116101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ford DF. Shaping theology: engagements in a religious and secular world. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Farrell D, Keenan P, Taylor M. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Qualitative Assessment Interview [PTSD-QAI] cited from Farrell, D.P. (2003) Idiosyncratic trauma characteristics experienced by survivors of sexual abuse by clergy or religious. [Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis}. In press Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oakley L, Kinmond K, Oakley L. What is spiritual abuse? UK Springer; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ward DJ. The lived experience of spiritual abuse. Ment Health Relig Cult. 2011;14(9):899–915. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2010.536206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hendry F, McVittie C. Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(7):961–75. doi: 10.1177/1049732304266738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Durkin J, Usher K, Jackson D. Using consensus from experts to inform a shared understanding of subjective terms. Nurse Res. 2022.;30(4). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Giese JL, Cote JA. Defining consumer satisfaction. Acad Mark Sci Rev. 2000;1(1):1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Strauss C, Lever Taylor BL, Gu J, Kuyken W, Baer R, Jones F, et al. What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;47:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zachar P, First MB, Kendler KS. Prolonged grief disorder and the DSM: A history. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2023;211(5):386–92. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stefano Federici

8 Nov 2024

PONE-D-24-33887The impact of clergy sexual abuse on spirituality and health: a systematic scoping review of the literature.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Durkin,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The reviewers gave the manuscript high marks and requested only minor revisions to the text. Therefore, I urge the authors to proceed by fulfilling all the requests as indicated in the comments.<!--EndFragment-->

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 23 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Peer review at PLOS ONE is not double-blinded (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/editorial-and-peer-review-process). For this reason, authors should include in the revised manuscript all the information removed for blind review.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

“Health Equity Grant St Vincent's Health Australia “

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have referenced (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis) on page 25, which has currently not yet been accepted for publication. Please remove this from your References and amend this to state in the body of your manuscript: (ie “Bewick et al. [Unpublished]”) as detailed online in our guide for authors

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-reference-style

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The reviewers gave the manuscript high marks and requested only minor revisions to the text. Therefore, I urge the authors to proceed by fulfilling all the requests as indicated in the comments.

Comments from the Editorial Office: Please justify your choice for focusing this study on the Catholic church.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author has provided an examination of scientific literature on the topic of spiritual harm, explaining the concept and its relevant measures. The paper is well designed, it indicates the complexity of the analyzed theoretical approach. However, the section DISCUSSION does not present well the main findings elaborated in this study. It has to be more detailed showing better the connections between the key concepts introduced in this study.

Reviewer #2: 1) the Author has well design study, it need to address more social behavior status also.

2) did Author observed this types of studies any journal which is investigating other factor or same?

2) did The Author try to find/compare economic factor and what cause of this sexual abuse?

Reviewer #3: Dear authors,

This is an excellent and rigorous systematic scoping review. It was very clear and easy to follow the steps that you had taken in understanding how Spiritual Harm is understood in contemporary academic journals. You do well to recognise the limitations and offer future research direction. It is technically sound and the steps are clear to replicate.

My recommendation is to accept, but there are two points that I am not clear on relating to 4. Positionality. The first is to offer a better explanation for what "...some understand the harm perpetrated through their research, support and/or advocacy for victims and survivors" means. I was not clear on what this harm looks like through the research that you do.

The second, you discuss at the end that you had open dialogue about your own experiences which is very important and you considered the influence, but my question is what did this influence have on your own individual understandings but also the larger decisions made regarding the reporting of the results.

On p.16 I found a double comma. Under background: "Comprised by" could be "comprised of". Otherwise, it is very well written.

Reviewer #4: The present manuscript The impact of clergy sexual abuse on spirituality and health: a systematic scoping review of the literature shows and details a quality scientific research contemplating all the components to be considered in order to publish in this journal. The search strategies implemented to support the research are adequate and are carefully detailed in the development of this manuscript. The three stages executed as part of the strategies are convenient and allow achieving the proposed objectives, and the data clearly show a systematic review of studies on the subject.

The conclusions should be addressed with greater precision and correspond to the central objective of the project for which this research has taken place, which the authors of the manuscript state is to address the harm experienced by survivors of sexual abuse in the Church in contexts of health and spiritual care, in this sense a greater forcefulness is lacking in the conclusions which do not allow contributing relevant information to the project in question.

The manuscript has been written in English, it is adequate for the parameters of the journal, the language used is simple and at the same time respects the parameters of spelling and writing.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes:  Andrea Stefanía Angulo Prado

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0317821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317821.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


21 Nov 2024

Dear Editorial Team and Reviewers,

Thank you for taking the time to consider our paper. I have provided a detailed list of every comment and our response. We have addressed all concerns and agree with all of the feedback and comments you provided. You have supported us in improving this important work and we appreciate the time and effort you took while reviewing our work. We have copied the table below. For the full list of comments and amendments, see the uploaded file Response to Reviewers.

Regards, Authors.

List of review comments and responses

Editorial and Peer Review Comments Response and Change

Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“Health Equity Grant St Vincent's Health Australia “

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

• Thank you. This is useful. The section has been added to the funding section. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

We note that you have referenced (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis) on page 25, which has currently not yet been accepted for publication. Please remove this from your References and amend this to state in the body of your manuscript: (ie “Bewick et al. [Unpublished]”) as detailed online in our guide for authors

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-reference-style

• Thank you. I have amended the reference and now listed two citations – one for the paper which lists the use of the PTSD-QAI (Farrell D. Sexual abuse perpetrated by Roman Catholic priests and religious. Mental Health, Religion & Culture. 2009;12(1):39-53.) and the other which is the unpublished thesis. This now states that the thesis is unpublished in the reference list rather than refer to a specific date.

Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

• Thank you. All summary files have titles and have been listed at the end of the manuscript as instructed.

Comments from the Editorial Office: Please justify your choice for focusing this study on the Catholic church.

• Thank you, we have strengthened this justification in the introduction and the background and focus of the review by both adding citations to justify the focus and also adding additional text which highlights the particularity of the harm in the Catholic Church context. These changes are highlighted in the tracked change manuscript.

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: The author has provided an examination of scientific literature on the topic of spiritual harm, explaining the concept and its relevant measures. The paper is well designed, it indicates the complexity of the analyzed theoretical approach. Thank you.

However, the section DISCUSSION does not present well the main findings elaborated in this study.

It has to be more detailed showing better the connections between the key concepts introduced in this study.

• Thank you. We have been through the discussion and made these points clearer. The discussion now better connects to the key concepts in the study.

Reviewer #3: Dear authors,

This is an excellent and rigorous systematic scoping review. It was very clear and easy to follow the steps that you had taken in understanding how Spiritual Harm is understood in contemporary academic journals. You do well to recognise the limitations and offer future research direction. It is technically sound and the steps are clear to replicate.

My recommendation is to accept, but there are two points that I am not clear on relating to 4. Positionality. The first is to offer a better explanation for what "...some understand the harm perpetrated through their research, support and/or advocacy for victims and survivors" means. I was not clear on what this harm looks like through the research that you do.

• Thank you. We agree this wasn’t clear and have amended to read as: Some authors have lived experienced of sexual abuse in a Church context as survivors and some do not have a lived experience of the harm, but support survivors of sexual assault through their research, and/or advocacy for victims and survivors.

The second, you discuss at the end that you had open dialogue about your own experiences which is very important and you considered the influence, but my question is what did this influence have on your own individual understandings but also the larger decisions made regarding the reporting of the results.

• Thank you. We have strengthened this section and revised as follows:

Throughout this review, all authors had open dialogue about their professional, personal and spiritual experiences and considered the influence this had on understanding and decisions regarding the reporting of results. These conversations helped us to understand potential biases and blind spots we could encounter prior to undertaking the scoping review. This allowed us to ensure all biases were managed and avoided. Collectively, the authors agreed to adhere to the original protocol, clearly and transparently document all processes undertaken in order to minimise the potential for undue influence based in personal perspectives. The authors took every precaution to ensure that personal perspectives did not have an undue influence on the reporting of results.

On p.16 I found a double comma. Under background: "Comprised by" could be "comprised of". Otherwise, it is very well written.

• Comma removed and comprised of changed

Reviewer #4: The present manuscript The impact of clergy sexual abuse on spirituality and health: a systematic scoping review of the literature shows and details a quality scientific research contemplating all the components to be considered in order to publish in this journal.

The search strategies implemented to support the research are adequate and are carefully detailed in the development of this manuscript. The three stages executed as part of the strategies are convenient and allow achieving the proposed objectives, and the data clearly show a systematic review of studies on the subject.

• Thank you this is useful.

The conclusions should be addressed with greater precision and correspond to the central objective of the project for which this research has taken place, which the authors of the manuscript state is to address the harm experienced by survivors of sexual abuse in the Church in contexts of health and spiritual care, in this sense a greater forcefulness is lacking in the conclusions which do not allow contributing relevant information to the project in question.

• Thank you. We have revised the discussion and strengthened this section to make the conclusions clearer. We appreciate this feedback.

The manuscript has been written in English, it is adequate for the parameters of the journal, the language used is simple and at the same time respects the parameters of spelling and writing.

• Thank you

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PLOS One Scoping Review 191124.docx

pone.0317821.s005.docx (25.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Stefano Federici

6 Jan 2025

The impact of clergy sexual abuse on spirituality and health: a systematic scoping review of the literature.

PONE-D-24-33887R1

Dear Dr. Durkin,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Revisions have been made to a high standard and addressed the concerns of the reviewers. Recommend accept.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Dr. Bhagwat Alapure

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Stefano Federici

PONE-D-24-33887R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Durkin,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Stefano Federici

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. PRISMA-SCR checklist.

    (PDF)

    pone.0317821.s001.pdf (498.3KB, pdf)
    S2 File. Database searches.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0317821.s002.docx (20.8KB, docx)
    S3 File. Operationalising SH in the literature.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0317821.s003.docx (31.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PLOS One Scoping Review 191124.docx

    pone.0317821.s005.docx (25.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES