Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Apr 16;15:13213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96680-6

Wolbachia infection facilitates adaptive increase in male egg size in response to environmental changes

Eloïse Leroy 1,2, Siyi Gao 1, Maya Gonzalez 2, Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury 2, Midori Tuda 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC12003752  PMID: 40240454

Abstract

Under challenging conditions such as maladapted biotic and abiotic conditions, females can plastically adjust their egg size (gamete or zygote size) to counteract fitness declines early in life. Recent evidence suggests that endosymbionts may enhance this egg-size plasticity. Possible endosymbionts’ modification of impact of multiple stressors is not well explored. Therefore, this study aims to test (1) whether Wolbachia infection influences the plasticity of parental investment in egg size under suboptimal environmental conditions and (2) whether the plasticity depends on the sex of eggs. We used three lines of the azuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis): a line coinfected with the wBruCon and wBruOri Wolbachia strains, a cured line infected solely with the wBruCon, and an uninfected (cured) line. These lines were subjected to either a control environment or a simulated climate change environment (elevated temperature and carbon dioxide levels, eT&CO2) to examine Wolbachia infection effects on parental investment in their offspring (egg size) and its subsequent impact on offspring fitness, including survival, development, and adult lifespan under starvation. After two days of eT&CO2 exposure, coinfected parents increased male egg size only. Larger eggs developed faster in both sexes and exhibited higher survival. However, offspring adult lifespan was not influenced by egg size but by environment, sex, Wolbachia infection, and development time: eT&CO2 reduced male lifespan but not female lifespan, the singly-infected line females lived longer than coinfected and uninfected line females, and shorter development time linked to longer lifespan. The negative correlation between development time and lifespan was higher under eT&CO2 but not sex-specific. This study is the first to demonstrate sex-specific egg size plasticity associated with Wolbachia infection in species with sex determination systems other than haplodiploid.

Keywords: Inclusive fitness, Insect, Modified atmosphere, Parent age, Plasticity, Reproduction, Sex difference, Thermal stress

Subject terms: Evolutionary ecology, Microbial ecology

Introduction

The anthropogenic combustion of fossil fuel steadily increases atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, contributing global climate change. By 2100, the average global surface temperature is projected to rise by 2 °C due to the greenhouse effects of CO21. Organisms on earth must adapt to these simultaneous changes in multiple environmental factors by plastically or constitutively altering their life history traits, morphology, and behavior to mitigate fitness reductions. In animals, including arthropods, this plasticity can manifest as an increase in zygote (egg) size, which can enhance offspring fitness under challenging conditions2–5 (but not necessarily6). Such parental investment involves the transfer of maternal resources to eggs, a process influenced by environmental factors like temperature and CO2 levels separately7–10 or in combination11. Additionally, investment strategies may vary with egg sex, as maternal and paternal resources and genetic or epigenetic components can affect offspring traits, including body size, in response to environmental cues, including temperature12–16.

Wolbachia pipientis (alpha-Proteobacteria) is an endosymbiotic bacterium infecting approximately 52% of terrestrial arthropods17. Depending on the host context, Wolbachia may establish mutualistic, parasitic, or commensal relationships with their host18. These bacteria are maternally transmitted through eggs and are known to induce reproductive manipulations such as cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), parthenogenesis, feminization, and male-killing in arthropod hosts18. CI is the most common and has been reported in various host–Wolbachia interactions. CI (or unidirectional CI) results in the death of eggs at early developmental stages that are produced by uninfected females mated with infected males. Since infected females are compatible with both infected and uninfected males, they receive a reproductive advantage compared to uninfected females. In addition, Wolbachia influence host reproduction19,20, immunity16,21–23, behavior24, and other fitness traits25,26. Fitness effects of Wolbachia are context-dependent: Environmental temperature27,28, host genotype29,30, Wolbachia genotype27,31, coinfection23, and host sex27,32 have been shown to influence Wolbachia effects on host fitness.

A seed predator, the azuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae), is one of the most serious pests of stored pulses33, laying eggs on fabaceous seeds, where larvae feed and develop within the seeds34. Approximately 96% of natural populations are coinfected by two Wolbachia strains—wBruCon (referred to as Con hereafter) and wBruOri (referred to as Ori)—while single infections are rare (1.6% with Con, 2.4% with Ori35). (Note that the identifiers Con and Ori do not represent phylogenetic groups since they are based on the sequence of wsp gene, which exhibits a high recombination rate.) The third “strain” wBruAus was later found to be not a bacterium but a fragmented and pseudogenized Wolbachia-like genome remnant transferred to the host sex chromosome, X36,37. Coinfection can reduce or increase total Wolbachia density compared to single infection with Con38,39. Both strains belong to supergroup B40 but differ in their infection dynamics, with Ori being more abundant during the egg stage and Con becoming dominant in adults41. While Wolbachia reduces beetle fecundity, it confers benefits such as shorter development time, higher locomotion, increased number of sperms donated to females per mating25. Interestingly, the genome of C. chinensis is approximately half the size of that of its relative C. maculatus, which is typically uninfected by Wolbachia35,42.

Arthropod females can adaptively increase egg size in response to suboptimal conditions, such as maladapted host plants2 or elevated temperatures15,43,44. For a seed beetle, this adjustment requires about two days2. Endosymbiotic Wolbachia can enhance host tolerance to heat stress31. However, evidence of endosymbionts affecting egg size is limited (to haplodiploid arthropod hosts45,46). The combined effects of temperatures and CO2 on egg size have rarely been tested (but see11), let alone the effect that Wolbachia infection can have on host egg size response to such environmental changes.

Previous studies have shown that the fecundity, hatchability and carrying capacity of coinfected C. chinensis decline with a temperature rise by 2 °C47–49. Body size decreased when reared under elevated temperature and CO2 (eT&CO2) and in coinfected hosts compared to singly-infected hosts regardless of sexes39. This study aimed to test (1) whether Wolbachia infection influences the plasticity of parental investment in egg size under climate change conditions, eT&CO2, suboptimal for C. chinensis and (2) whether the plasticity depends on the sex of eggs. We used three lines of C. chinensis with different Wolbachia infection statuses: a coinfected line (Con and Ori), a singly-infected line (Con only), and an uninfected line. Each line was exposed to either a control environment or a simulated climate change environment. We assessed the impact of Wolbachia on parental investment (egg size) and offspring fitness (survival, development time, and lifespan) under these conditions.

Materials and methods

Biological materials

It takes 22 days for C. chinensis females and 21 days for males to develop from eggs to adult emergence at 30 °C. Females live for approximately 7 days when paired with a single male and oviposit, and males live for approximately 8 days when paired with a single female. Eggs laid by females hatch within 4–5 days. Laboratory cultures of C. chinensis (jC strain) were maintained under constant conditions without providing water or food to the adults (aphagously) [30 °C, 60–70% relative humidity (r.h.)] for over 70 years, corresponding to over 1100 generations50. An isofemale line was established by randomly selecting a female–male pair from the culture. To create sublines with distinct infection statuses, adults from multiple sublines were treated for one generation with 800 μl of either 0.05% or 0.25% tetracycline solution applied to a filter paper to eliminate one or both strains of Wolbachia39. This resulted in the establishment of three sublines: coinfected, singly infected (Con only), and uninfected.

Experimental procedure

Each C. chinensis line was reared at low larval densities (one or two hatched eggs per azuki bean seed, Vigna angularis var. angularis) to minimize the effects of larval crowding. Newly emerged adults from beans (within 4 h) were collected, and one female–male pair was introduced into a Petri dish containing 5 g of azuki beans. The pairs were allowed to lay eggs under either the control conditions (30 °C, 500–600 ppm CO2) or elevated temperature and CO2 conditions (32 °C, 1000–1200 ppm CO2, referred to as eT&CO2), with 60% r.h. and a 16:8 h light–dark cycle. After 24 h, each pair was transferred to a new dish with the same amount of beans. This procedure was repeated three times over 72 h (Fig. 1), and the pair was removed from the third dish. Total of 48 parent pairs were prepared [2 environmental conditions × 3 host lines (Wolbachia infection statuses) × 8 parent replicates].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Experiment design for studying egg size plasticity. A pair of beetles from coinfected, singly-infected (Con only), or uninfected lines was allowed to oviposit for three consecutive days under either control conditions or elevated temperature and CO2 (eT&CO2) conditions (eight pairs for each combination of line and environmental condition). Beans with a single hatched egg were isolated to track the timing of adult emergence and mortality. Beetle size relative to bean size is smaller.

To assess the relationship between egg size (laid by females from different lines on various dates under distinct environments) and survival during the larval/pupal stages, as well as adult lifespan under starvation, beans with a single hatched egg were isolated individually in wells of a 48-well plate and covered with a transparent lid (Fig. 1), one week after the removal of parental pairs. Up to 10 beans per oviposition day per beetle pair were assessed. A single azuki bean seed is sufficient to rear a few C. chinensis individuals to adulthood47. The length of the eggs (as attached to bean surface) was measured to a precision of 1 μm using a microscope (H-5500, Keyence, Osaka, Japan) at 50 × magnification, before adult emergence started. Starting 19 days after oviposition, adult emergence from each bean was recorded every 24 h, and the sex of the emerged offspring adults was determined based on distinct sex dimorphism in antennal morphology. The death of each offspring adult was subsequently monitored every 24 h until all individuals in the wells had died.

Statistical analyses

Egg size (length) was analyzed using a general linear mixed model (GLMM) with environment, beetle line (Wolbachia infection status), parents’ age, sex, their interactions up to three-way, as fixed effects, and parent ID as a random effect, using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method. Logistic regression was applied to test the survival (binary) of offspring from egg hatching to adult emergence, with environment, beetle line, parents’ age, their interactions, egg length, and parent ID as fixed effects, and Bonferroni correction was applied in posthoc pairwise comparisons. Development time (from egg to adult) was log-transformed and tested using GLMM with environment, beetle line, parents’ age, sex, their interactions up to three-way, egg length, as fixed effects, and parent ID as a random effect, using REML. In these analyses, interaction terms were excluded from the highest interaction if its p > 0.05. Offspring adult lifespan under starvation was log-transformed and tested using GLMM with environment, beetle line, parents’ age, sex, egg length, and log(development time), as fixed effects, and parent ID as a random effect, using REML. Development time was included for a correlation between these life history traits. For significant variables, their two-way and three-way interactions were also included but non-significant interactions were excluded one by one. In GLMMs, the normality of residual error distributions was verified. For posthoc multiple comparisons, Tukey tests were performed. These tests were conducted for each beetle line separately when complex interaction terms with beetle line were present. Significance level was set at p = 0.05. All analyses were conducted using JMP 14.3.0.

Results

Egg size plasticity under climate change conditions

Egg length for both sexes was significantly influenced by the environment (p = 0.049), parents’ age (p < 0.001), the interaction between the environment and parents’ age (p = 0.004), and three-way interactions among environment, line, and parents’ age (p = 0.024) and among environment, parents’ age, and sex (marginally significant, p = 0.054; Table 1). Specifically, egg size was reduced under eT&CO2 and as parents aged (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the size of male eggs laid by coinfected parents on the third day was larger under eT&CO2 compared to under control environmental conditions (Fig. 2). Parent ID as a random effect was significant (p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Egg length. Effect of environment (control or eT&CO2), infection status [co-, singly- (Con only), or un-infected], and parents’ age.

df1 df2 F p
Environment 1 42.14 4.11 0.049
Line 2 42.14 0.54 0.586
Parents’ age 2 1304.85 229.87  < 0.001
Sex 1 1310.28 0.00 0.944
Environment × line 2 42.12 1.31 0.279
Environment × parents’ age 2 1304.81 5.56 0.004
Environment × sex 1 1310.36 0.28 0.599
Line × parents’ age 4 1304.77 0.86 0.489
Line × sex 2 1310.43 0.37 0.690
Parents’ age × sex 2 1311.55 0.90 0.408
Environment × line × parents’ age 4 1304.74 2.81 0.024
Environment × parents’ age × sex 2 1311.60 2.93 0.054
Wald p
Parent ID  < 0.001

General linear mixed model with parent ID as a random effect. Bold p values indicate statistical significance. An italicized p value indicates marginal statistical significance.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of infection status on egg size across environments, parents’ ages (or parents’ exposure times) and sexes. Mean egg size (with 95% confidence intervals) is shown for coinfected, singly-infected (Con only), and uninfected lines in control environment (in blue) or elevated temperature and CO2 (eT&CO2) (in red). Different alphabets indicate significant differences within beetle lines.

Survival from hatched eggs to the adult stage

The sex of the dead individuals in most cases was unable to be determined because of their early developmental stages. Therefore, the data for all eggs was not separated into each sex. Egg size significantly affected survival from hatched eggs to the adult stage (p = 0.014; Table 2): Larger eggs have a higher probability of survival (Fig. 3). The effects of environment, infection, and parents’ age, and their interaction effects were not significant (Table 2). Parent ID did not affect survival to the adult (Table 2).

Table 2.

Probability of adult offspring emergence (survival from hatched eggs to adulthood).

df Inline graphic p
Environment 1 0.00 1.000
Line 2 0.00 1.000
Parents’ age 2 1.21 0.546
Egg length 1 6.82 0.014
Parent ID 44 50.47 0.233

Logistic regression model. Inline graphic: likelihood ratio Inline graphic. A significant value is in bold.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Size distributions (upper panel: data density; lower panel: frequency) of hatched eggs that developed into adults (“survived”) and those that did not survive to adulthood (“dead”).

Development time

Environment, parents’ age, offspring sex, and egg length significantly affected offspring development time (p < 0.001) but beetle line effect was absent (p = 0.167) (Table 3): Specifically, eT&CO2 reduced development time, offspring from eggs laid on the first and second days developed faster than offspring from the third day eggs, male offspring developed faster, and larger eggs developed faster, regardless of sex and environment (Fig. 4). None of interaction effects were significant and excluded from the model. Parent ID as a random effect was significant (p < 0.001).

Table 3.

Development time from egg to adult (log-transformed).

df1 df2 F p
Environment 1 44.25 45.37  < 0.001
Line 2 43.92 1.87 0.167
Parents’ age 2 1331 18.81  < 0.001
Sex 1 1326 184.50  < 0.001
Egg length 1 1324 35.58  < 0.001
Wald p
Parent ID  < 0.001

General linear mixed model with parent ID as a random effect. Statistically significant p values are shown in bold.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Development time (log-transformed) from egg to adult reared in control environment or eT&CO2 (elevated temperature and CO2) environment. (a) Effect of egg length. Solid lines represent linear regression fits, with shaded bands indicating 95% confidence intervals. (b) Effects of parents’ age and offspring sex. Offspring (mean) from same parents relate to solid lines. Effect of beetle line was non-significant. Different alphabets indicate significant differences.

Adult lifespan under starvation

Environment, line, sex, log(development time) (p < 0.001), two-way interactions between environment and sex (p < 0.001), line and sex (p = 0.008), and between environment and log(development time) (p = 0.048) affected offspring adult lifespan (under starvation) but egg size (p = 0.400) and parents’ age (p = 0.831) did not (Table 4; Fig. 5): Specifically, male offspring lifespan (starvation resistance) from parents exposed to and reared under eT&CO2 was shorter but female offspring lifespan was not affected by environments, and females lived longer than males (Fig. 5). Offspring that developed faster lived longer and this negative correlation was stronger under eT&CO2, regardless of sex (Fig. 5). The singly-infected (Con only) line female offspring lived longer than co-infected and uninfected line females but no between-line difference was found in male offspring lifespan (Fig. 5). There was no significant two-way interaction effect between sex and log(development time) (p = 0.821) and three-way interaction effect among environment, sex, and log(development time) (p = 0.257), which were therefore excluded from the model for offspring adult lifespan. Parent ID as a random effect was also significant (p = 0.001).

Table 4.

Adult offspring lifespan under starvation of three beetle lines with different Wolbachia infection status in control and eT&CO2 (elevated temperature and CO2) environments.

df1 df2 F p
Environment 1 48.97 28.03  < 0.001
Line 2 44.11 11.58  < 0.001
Parents’ age 2 1265.74 0.19 0.831
Sex 1 1264.56 2449.29  < 0.001
Log(development time) 1 1272.48 74.69  < 0.001
Egg length 1 1201.27 0.71 0.400
Environment × sex 1 1262.23 21.85  < 0.001
Environment × log(development time) 1 1273.14 3.91 0.048
Line × sex 2 1257.55 4.81 0.008
Wald p
Parent ID 0.001

General linear mixed model with parent ID as a random effect. Statistically significant p values are shown in bold.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a) Lifespan (log10-transformed)(under starvation) of offspring adults developed from eggs laid in different environments. Egg length did not affect lifespan under starvation (p = 0.400). (b) Correlation of log10(offspring adult lifespan under starvation) with log10(development time) (p < 0.001) and two-way interaction effects on log10(offspring adult lifespan under starvation) [environment × sex p < 0.001; environment × log10(development time) p = 0.048]. (c) Female and male offspring adult lifespan of beetle lines with different Wolbachia infection statuses [coinfected, singly-infected (Con only), and uninfected] laid and reared in control or eT&CO2 (elevated temperature and CO2) environment (line × sex p = 0.008). Different alphabets indicate significant differences. Jittering in (b,c) for visibility.

Discussion

Egg size in C. chinensis was influenced by environmental changes and parental age. Exposure to and rearing under elevated temperature and CO2 (eT&CO2) reduced egg size, accelerated development (regardless of offspring sex), and shortened the lifespan of male offspring adults. Large egg size increased larva-to-adult survival and accelerated development. As previously reported51, egg size decreased with parental age, except for the coinfected line. In this line, male egg size increased after two days of eT&CO2 exposure compared to control conditions (Fig. 2). Egg size was the primary trait affecting larva-to-adult survival and development time (Figs. 3 and 4), with larger eggs improved both traits. Interestingly, parents selectively enhanced this early-life fitness of male offspring (sons) by increasing male egg size. Faster development, rather than egg size itself, correlated with longer lifespan under starvation in both sexes, particularly under eT&CO2 (Fig. 5).

Coinfection with Wolbachia strains Con and Ori enhanced the host’s ability to plastically respond to environmental changes by modulating egg size. This response could involve Wolbachia’s role in host oogenesis and nutritional provisioning52–54. Interestingly, the delay in egg size increase (approximately two days) aligns with the time required for beetle species to adjust to maladaptive hosts2 or high temperatures15, although a shorter response period has been observed in C. maculatus under temperature stress44. While examples of endosymbionts influencing host egg size are rare, some exceptions exist in haplodiploid thrips and mites45,46. The present study is the first to demonstrate sex-dependent egg size plasticity in a species with sex chromosome-based sex determination (XY male). From a population genetics perspective, stress-induced fitness variation in males can efficiently purge deleterious mutations with minimal demographic cost. In C. maculatus, male genetic load (inbreeding depression measured as lifespan) at adult stage is lower than female load at moderate to high temperatures, potentially supporting this view55.

Strikingly, the increase in egg size under eT&CO2 occurred only in male eggs (Fig. 2). Larger eggs developed faster regardless of sex (Fig. 4), consistent with previous findings in this species3 and in C. maculatus5. Adults that developed faster also lived longer, and this correlation was stronger under eT&CO2, regardless of sex. The male-biased increase in egg size may be explained by sexual conflict56. Earlier male maturation enhances mating opportunities with newly emerging females, whereas earlier-maturing females might suffer from costs associated with sexual harassment by males57,58, despite the potential reproductive advantages of larger females59. (Note, however, multiple mating effect on females can also be positive, depending on populations60). This could drive parents to prioritize male offspring under stressful conditions to maximize inclusive fitness.

The observed increase in egg size under eT&CO2 may not be solely due to high temperature but could also be influenced by elevated CO2 or their synergistic effects. Elevated CO2 has been shown to increase egg size in the moth Lobesia botrana10, though this effect may be mediated by plant responses to CO2 (increased content of sugar and phenolic compounds) as the plant was grown and used as a larval diet10. When reared under combined high temperature and CO2 stress, the seed beetle Zabrotes subfasciatus exhibited increased body size and protein content but reduced lipid content, although egg size change was not studied11. While this study as well as ours could not isolate the independent effects of these abiotic factors, understanding their combined impact is crucial for predicting climate change effects on insect populations.

Our study did not exclude the potential contribution of paternal investment to egg traits to better simulate a natural conditions, where males provide females with nutrient-rich seminal fluid along with sperms (together, ejaculates) during mating. Larger ejaculates have been shown to enhance egg size, fecundity, and female lifespan (under water and food deprivation in C. chinensis61 and C. maculatus60,62,63). Male reproductive investment can increase under stressful environments: for instance, female propensity to mate increases under water deprivation in C. maculatus63,64. Under increased temperature and CO2 stresses in our study, parental females may have remated more frequently, potentially contributing to the observed increase in egg size.

Finally, Wolbachia influenced offspring adult lifespan under starvation. Removal of Ori from the coinfected line (resulting in single infection with Con) increased female lifespan, whereas complete Wolbachia removal reduced it (Fig. 5). This suggests that Con is beneficial for the host, while Ori imposes costs, mitigating the benefit provided by Con in coinfected beetles. The impact of Wolbachia on host lifespan varies depending on host sex, genotype and the coevolutionary history of Wolbachia infections of particular host populations16,29,30,65. Environmental stress also affected lifespan under starvation independently of Wolbachia infection effects. Male lifespan was shorter under eT&CO2 conditions, whereas female lifespan was unaffected, indicating that males are more vulnerable to environmental stress under starvation. Similar findings have been reported for C. maculatus, where male lifespan is reduced due to faster body mass loss at higher temperatures66. Although increased male egg size contributed to their survival and development early in life, continuous exposure to environmental stress likely negates these benefits later in life. Resilience of females to environmental changes may stem from sexual dimorphism in body size: Females accumulate more resources during development and eventually become larger in body size, which increases thermal tolerance67. Males, being smaller, intrinsically may be less tolerant to combined environmental and starvation stresses. Male lifespan is also shown to be driven by maternal genetic effects68. Additionally, female beetles exhibited lower activity levels, potentially conserving resources more effectively than males. The combined effects of environmental stress and Wolbachia infection (coinfection or Ori infection) may have synergistically reduced lifespan, similar to findings in other insects subjected to high temperature and Wolbachia infection stress69. While many species of Bruchinae beetles, including C. chinensis, are adapted to arid and aphagous conditions70, starvation remains a key factor influencing their life history traits71,72.

Conclusions

Wolbachia coinfection enabled host beetles to plastically adjust male egg size in response to stressful environments, enhancing early-life survival and fitness. This study is the first to demonstrate sex-specific egg size plasticity due to Wolbachia infection in a species with sex chromosome-based sex determination. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving this sex-dependent plasticity aided by coinfecting Wolbachia.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Chen Hao Wang for assisting with part of our experiment. This study was supported by KAKENHI (19K06840) from JSPS and the Realizing Diversity Initiative in the Research Environment at Kyushu University from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEXT) to MT.

Author contributions

M.T. conceived the idea and designed methodology; E.L., S.G., and M.T. collected the data; E.L. and M.T. analyzed the data and led the writing of the manuscript; M.G., M.-P.E.-O., and M.T. revised the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Data availability

The data obtained in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author (MT).

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Arias, P. A. et al. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Masson-Delmotte, V., et al.) 33−144 (Cambridge University Press, 2021). 10.1017/9781009157896.002. (2023)
  • 2.Fox, C. W., Thakar, M. S. & Mousseau, T. A. Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: An adaptive maternal effect. Am. Nat.149, 149–163. 10.1086/285983 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yanagi, S. & Tuda, M. Interaction effect among maternal environment, maternal investment and progeny genotype on life history traits in Callosobruchus chinensis. Funct. Ecol.24, 383–391 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hilker, M., Salem, H. & Fatouros, N. E. Adaptive plasticity of insect eggs in response to environmental challenges. Annu. Rev. Entomol.68, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120120-100746 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fox, C. W. The influence of egg size on offspring performance in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Oikos71, 321–325 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fox, C. W. Maternal and genetic influences on egg size and larval performance in a seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus): Multigenerational transmission of a maternal effect?. Heredity73, 509517 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li, J. & Handler, A. M. Temperature-dependent sex-reversal by a transformer-2 gene-edited mutation in the spotted wing drosophila. Drosophila suzukii. Sci. Rep.7, 12363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12405-4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tadros, W. & Lipshitz, H. D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: A play in two acts. Development136, 3033–3042 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lockwood, B. L., Julick, C. R. & Montooth, K. L. Maternal loading of a small heat shock protein increases embryothermal tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol.220, 4492–4501 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Becker, C., Herrmann, K. & Reineke, A. Biological control in a changing climate: plant-mediated impact of elevated CO2 concentration on Lobesia botrana eggs and egg parasitism by Trichogramma cacoeciae. J. Pest Sci.96, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01545-w (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schneider, D., Ramos, A. G. & Cordoba-Aguilar, A. Multigenerational experimental simulation of climate change on an economically important insect pest. Ecol. Evol.10, 12893–12909. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6847 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arnqvist, G. et al. The genetic architecture of metabolic rate: Environment specific epistasis between mitochondrial and nuclear genes in an insect. Evolution64(12), 3354–3363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01135.x (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaufmann, P. et al. Y-linked copy number polymorphism of target of rapamycin is associated with sexual size dimorphism in seed beetles. Mol. Biol. Evol.40, msad167. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msad167 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fortier, E. & Belote, J. M. Temperature-dependent gene silencing by an expressed inverted repeat in Drosophila. Genesis26, 240–244 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vasudeva, R. et al. Adaptive thermal plasticity enhances sperm and egg performance in a model insect. eLife8, e49452. 10.7554/eLife.49452 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tafesh-Edwards, G. et al. Wolbachia endosymbionts in Drosophila regulate the resistance to Zika virus infection in a sex dependent manner. Front. Microbiol.15, 1380647. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1380647 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weinert, L. A., Araujo-Jnr, E. V., Ahmed, M. Z. & Welch, J. J. The incidence of bacterial endosymbionts in terrestrial arthropods. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci.282, 20150249. 10.1098/rspb.2015.0249 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Werren, J. H., Baldo, L. & Clark, M. E. Wolbachia: Master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nature Rev. Microbiol.6, 741–751. 10.1038/nrmicro1969 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang, H.-J., Cui, J.-R., Chen, J., Bing, X.-L. & Hong, X.-Y. Proteomic analysis of Laodelphax striatellus gonads reveals proteins that may manipulate host reproduction by Wolbachia. Ins. Biochem. Mol. Biol.113, 103211. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103211 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li, T.-P. et al. Endosymbionts reduce microbiome diversity and modify host metabolism and fecundity in the planthopper Sogatella furcifera. mSystems7, e01516–e01521. 10.1128/msystems.01516-21 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teixeira, L., Ferreira, A. & Ashburner, M. The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol.6, e2. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000002 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van Nouhuys, S., Kohonen, M. & Duplouy, A. Wolbachia increases the susceptibility of a parasitoid wasp to hyperparasitism. J. Exp. Biol.219, 2984–2990. 10.1242/jeb.140699 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ueda, M. et al. Distinct effects of three Wolbachia strains on fitness and immune traits in Homona magnanima. Heredity130, 22–29. 10.1038/s41437-022-00574-6 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bi, J., Sehgal, A. & Williams, J. A. Wolbachia affects sleep behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Ins. Physiol.107, 81–88. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.02.011 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Okayama, K., Katsuki, M., Sumida, Y. & Okada, K. Costs and benefits of symbiosis between a bean beetle and Wolbachia. Anim. Behav.119, 19–26. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.004 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tuda, M. et al. Diversification, selective sweep, and body size in the invasive Palearctic alfalfa weevil infected with Wolbachia. Sci. Rep.11, 9664. 10.1038/s41598-021-88770-y (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Strunov, A., Lerch, S., Blanckenhorn, W. U., Miller, W. J. & Kapun, M. Complex effects of environment and Wolbachia infections on the life history of Drosophila melanogaster hosts. J. Evol. Biol.35, 788–802. 10.1111/jeb.14016 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martins, M., César, C. S. & Cogni, R. The effects of temperature on prevalence of facultative insect heritable symbionts across spatial and seasonal scales. Front. Microbiol.14, 1321341. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1321341 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Numajiri, Y., Kondo, N. I. & Toquenaga, Y. Melanic mutation causes a fitness decline in bean beetles infected by Wolbachia. Entomol. Exp. Appl.164, 54–65. 10.1111/eea.12588 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fry, A. J. & Rand, D. M. Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity93, 379–389 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gruntenko, N. E. et al. Various Wolbachia genotypes differently influence host Drosophila dopamine metabolism and survival under heat stress conditions. BMC Evol. Biol.17(Suppl 2), 252. 10.1186/s12862-017-1104-y (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Duran-Ahumada, S. et al. Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) mediated effects on the fitness and performance of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under variable temperatures and initial larval densities. J. Med. Entomol.61, 1155–1167. 10.1093/jme/tjae088 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haines, C. P. Observations on Callosobruchus analis (F) in Indonesia, including a key to storage Callosobruchus spp (Col, Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res.25, 9–16 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tuda, M. Applied evolutionary ecology of insects of the subfamily Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool.42, 337–346. 10.1303/aez.2007.337 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kondo, N. I. et al. Wolbachia infections in world populations of bean beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) infesting cultivated and wild legumes. Zool. Sci.28, 501–508. 10.2108/zsj.28.501 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kondo, N., Nikoh, N., Ijichi, N., Shimada, M. & Fukatsu, T. Genome fragment of Wolbachia endosymbiont transferred to X chromosome of host insect. PNAS22, 14280–14285 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nikoh, N. et al. Wolbachia genome integrated in an insect chromosome: Evolution and fate of laterally transferred endosymbiont genes. Genome Res.18(2), 272–280. 10.1101/gr.7144908 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kondo, N., Shimada, M. & Fukatsu, T. Infection density of Wolbachia endosymbiont affected by co-infection and host genotype. Biol. Lett.1, 488–491. 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0340 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.San, P. P. Diversities of endosymbiont Wolbachia and parasitoids affect species assemblages under climate change: Implications for biological control. PhD thesis (Graduate School, Kyushu University 2022).
  • 40.Kondo, N., Ijichi, N., Shimada, M. & Fukatsu, T. Prevailing triple infection with Wolbachia in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Mol. Ecol.11, 167–180. 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01432.x (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ijichi, N. et al. Internal spatiotemporal population dynamics of infection with three Wolbachia strains in the adzuki bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68, 4074–4080. 10.1128/AEM.68.8.4074-4080.2002 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arnqvist, G. et al. Genome size correlates with reproductive fitness in seed beetles. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci.282(1815), 20151421. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1421 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tscholl, T., Nachman, G., Spangl, B., Scalmani, I. & Walzer, A. Parental exposure to heat waves improves offspring reproductive investment in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), but not in its predator, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Ecol. Evol.13, e10748. 10.1002/ece3.10748 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vasudeva, R. Experimental evidence for stronger impacts of larval but not adult rearing temperature on female fertility and lifespan in a seed beetle. Evol. Ecol.37, 545–567. 10.1007/s10682-022-10227-z (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Katlav, A., Cook, J. M. & Riegler, M. Common endosymbionts affect host fitness and sex allocation via egg size provisioning. Proc. R. Soc. B.10.1098/rspb.2021.2582 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wybouw, N. et al. Egg provisioning explains the penetrance of symbiont-mediated sex allocation distortion in haplodiploids. Heredity131, 221–229. 10.1038/s41437-023-00638-1 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tuda, M. Density dependence depends on scale; at larval resource patch and at whole population. Res. Popul. Ecol.35, 261–271. 10.1007/BF02513599 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tuda, M. & Shimada, M. Population-level analysis on reduction in equilibrium population size of the azuki bean beetle. Res. Popul. Ecol.35, 231–239. 10.1007/BF02513595 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tuda, M. & Shimada, M. Developmental schedules and persistence of experimental host-parasitoid systems at two different temperatures. Oecologia103, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328616 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tuda, M. & Shimada, M. Complexity, evolution, and persistence in host-parasitoid experimental systems with Callosobruchus beetles as the host. Adv. Ecol. Res.37, 37–75. 10.1016/S0065-2504(04)37002-9 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yanagi, S. & Miyatake, T. Effects of maternal age on reproductive traits and fitness components of the offspring in the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Physiol. Entomol.27, 261–266. 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00294.x (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dedeine, F., Boulétreau, M. & Vavre, F. Wolbachia requirement for oogenesis: Occurrence within the genus Asobara (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) and evidence for intraspecific variation in A. tabida. Heredity95, 394–400. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800739 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Foster, J. et al. The Wolbachia genome of Brugia malayi: endosymbiont evolution within a human pathogenic nematode. PLoS Biol.3, e121 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hosokawa, T., Koga, R., Kikuchi, Y., Meng, X. Y. & Fukatsu, T. Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 769–774 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fox, C. W. & Stillwell, R. C. Environmental effects on sex differences in the genetic load for adult lifespan in a seed-feeding beetle. Heredity103, 62–72 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. Sexual Conflict (Princeton University Press, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Arnqvist, G. & Tuda, M. Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.277, 1345–1352. 10.1098/rspb.2009.2026 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yanagi, S. & Miyatake, T. Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Ins. Physiol.49, 823–827 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kyogoku, D. & Sota, T. Sexual selection increased offspring production via evolution of male and female traits. J. Evol. Biol.34, 501–511. 10.1111/jeb.13753 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fox, C. W. The influence of maternal age and mating frequency on egg size and offspring performance in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Oecologia96, 139–146. 10.1007/BF00318042 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yamane, T. Intra-specific variation in the effect of male seminal substances on female oviposition and longevity in Callosobruchus chinensis. Evol. Biol.40, 133–140 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fox, C. W. Multiple mating, lifetime fecundity and female mortality of the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol.7, 203–208 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ursprung, C., den Hollander, M. & Gwynne, D. T. Female seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, remate for male-supplied water rather than ejaculate nutrition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.63, 781–788 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Edvardsson, M. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: resource-rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim. Behav.74, 183–188 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brelsfoard, C. L. & Dobson, S. L. Wolbachia effects on host fitness and the influence of male aging on cytoplasmic incompatibility in Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol.48, 1008–1015 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Małek, D., Dańko, M. J. & Czarnoleski, M. Effect of age, mating history and temperature on male reproductive costs in the bean beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Stored Prod. Res.102, 102110. 10.1016/j.jspr.2023.102110 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Leiva, F. P., Santos, M., Rezende, E. L. & Verberk, W. C. E. P. Intraspecific variation of heat tolerance in a model ectotherm: The role of oxygen, cell size and body size. Funct. Ecol.38, 439–448. 10.1111/1365-2435.14485 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fox, C. W., Czesak, M. E. & Wallin, W. G. Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect. J. Evol. Biol.17, 1007–1017 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hu, D. et al. Interaction of high temperature stress and Wolbachia infection on the biological characteristic of Drosophila melanogaster. Insects14(6), 558. 10.3390/insects14060558 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tuda, M., Ronn, J., Buranapanichpan, S., Wasano, N. & Arnqvist, G. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Traits associated with stored-product pest status. Mol. Ecol.15(12), 3541–3551. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03030.x (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Fox, C. W. & Dingle, H. Dietary mediation of maternal age effects on offspring performance in a seed beetle (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol.8, 600–606 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shinoda, K. & Yoshida, T. Relationship between adult feeding and emigration in bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis Linne (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool.19, 202–211 (1984). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data obtained in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author (MT).


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES