Abstract
Macroautophagy involves the sequestration of cytoplasmic contents in a double-membrane autophagosome and its subsequent delivery to lysosomes for degradation and recycling. In Caenorhabditis elegans, autophagy participates in diverse processes such as stress resistance, cell fate specification, tissue remodeling, aging, and adaptive immunity. Genetic screens in C. elegans have identified a set of metazoan-specific autophagy genes that form the basis for our molecular understanding of steps unique to the autophagy pathway in multicellular organisms. Suppressor screens have uncovered multiple mechanisms that modulate autophagy activity under physiological conditions. C. elegans also provides a model to investigate how autophagy activity is coordinately controlled at an organismal level. In this chapter, we will discuss the molecular machinery, regulation, and physiological functions of autophagy, and also methods utilized for monitoring autophagy during C. elegans development.
Keywords: WormBook, C. elegans, autophagy, mitophagy, lysosome, P granules, development, longevity, dietary restriction, aggrephagy, lysophagy, lipophagy, xenophagy, hormesis
General background of autophagy
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process, essential to maintain cellular homeostasis and normal physiology. DeDuve first coined the term “autophagy” to describe the phenomenon in which autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes, resulting in the degradation of its contents (DeDuve 1963, 1964). Several decades later, the discovery of autophagy-related (atg genes) provided a framework to study the core molecular machinery that controls the process of autophagy (Klionsky et al. 2003; Ohsumi 2014). This review will discuss the proteins involved in autophagy and the role of this process in Caenorhabditis elegans development, and stress. We will describe how studies in C. elegans have advanced our molecular understanding of the process and its regulation in multicellular organisms. We will also discuss how specific cargos, such as protein aggregates and paternal organelles are selectively targeted for autophagic degradation. The physiological function of autophagy during C. elegans development has been extensively reviewed recently (Yang and Zhang 2014; Zhang and Baehrecke 2015; Hansen et al. 2018; Palmisano and Meléndez 2019), and thus we will present only the most recent advances.
There are several forms of autophagy, and they are distinguished based on the mechanism by which the cargo is sequestrated: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). CMA involves the selection and direct delivery of individual cytosolic proteins, on the basis of the KFERQ-like motif in their sequence (Kaushik and Cuervo 2018; Bourdenx et al. 2021). Microautophagy consists of the involution by pinocytosis of cargo directly into the lysosome prior to degradation (Wang and Klionsky 2003; Oku and Sakai 2018; Schuck 2020; Kuchitsu and Taguchi 2023). Early studies of microautophagy in rat liver found that microautophagy is the main autophagic response under starvation (Mortimore et al. 1983, 1988; de Waal et al. 1986). A form of microautophagy where cytosolic proteins are delivered to the endosome is referred to as endosomal Microautophagy (eMI) (Sahu et al. 2011). eMI can also be a selective process mediated by the heat shock protein HSPA8, where similar to CMA, the chaperone protein recognizes KFERQ-like motifs. However, very little is known about these processes in C. elegans, even though many proteins contain the KFERQ-like motifs (Meléndez A, personal communication). Thus, further studies are warranted in C. elegans to better understand the processes involved and the level of cross talk that exists between the different degradation pathways.
Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) involves the engulfment of cytoplasmic contents in a double-membrane autophagosome and its delivery to the vacuole (in yeast or plant) or lysosomes (in multicellular animals) for degradation (Lamb et al. 2013; Feng et al. 2014; Zhao and Zhang 2019a; Nakatogawa 2020; Zhao et al. 2021) (Fig. 1). The formation of the autophagosome can be dissected into several membrane remodeling steps, including initiation and nucleation of an isolation membrane (IM), also known as the phagophore, IM expansion, and closure, and finally, the fusion of the autophagosome with the lysosome for degradation (Lamb et al. 2013; Feng et al. 2014) (Fig. 1). Autophagy acts as a mechanism for coping with metabolic stresses and also has a scavenging function by selectively removing damaged/superfluous organelles and protein aggregates formed by misfolded/mutant proteins to maintain cellular homeostasis (Stolz et al. 2014; Anding and Baehrecke 2017; Lamark and Johansen 2021). Dysfunction of autophagy has been causatively linked to the pathogenesis of a variety of human diseases such as tumorigenesis, neurodegeneration, and immune diseases (Mizushima et al. 2008; Deretic and Levine 2018; Levine and Kroemer 2019; Zhao and Zhang 2019b; Yang and Klionsky 2020).
Fig. 1.
Overview of the macroautophagy process in C. elegans. The process of autophagy proceeds through discrete steps beginning with initiation, membrane nucleation, IM, or phagophore formation, IM/phagophore elongation, fusion with the lysosome to form an autolysosome, degradation and finally, recycling of the autophagosomal cargo.
Autophagic machinery for autophagosome formation based on yeast genetic screens
Genetic screens in yeast have identified a set of autophagy-related (ATG) genes essential for autophagosome biogenesis (Table 1 and Fig. 2). These screens are mainly based on defects in the accumulation of autophagic bodies (ABs: cargo-containing unruptured inner membranes) in the vacuole upon starvation, or on impaired delivery of the precursor of aminopeptidase I (prApeI) into the vacuole by the Cvt pathway (Takeshige et al. 1992; Tsukada and Ohsumi 1993; Baba et al. 1994; Harding et al. 1995, 1996). Atg proteins are recruited in a hierarchical order to the pre-autophagosomal structure (PAS) and act at discrete steps of autophagosome formation (Figs. 1 and 3). In brief, upon autophagy induction, the serine/threonine kinase Atg1 kinase complex (composed of Atg1, Atg13, and Atg17) acts at the most upstream stage to organize the autophagosome formation site (Noda and Fujioka 2015). Starvation-triggered dephosphorylation of Atg13 leads to the formation of the Atg1 complex that further undergoes liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) (Kamada et al. 2000; Fujioka et al. 2014, 2020; Yamamoto et al. 2016; Memisoglu and Haber 2019; Fujioka et al. 2020). The resultant puncta (also known as condensates) are tethered to the vacuolar membrane via interaction with the vacuolar membrane protein Vac8 (Hollenstein et al. 2019; Fujioka et al. 2020). The class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI(3)K) Vps34 complex (composed of Vps34, Vps15, Atg6, and Atg14) is then recruited to the early PAS for initiation of autophagosome formation (Suzuki et al. 2007). During IM expansion, also referred to as phagophore expansion, the Atg2–Atg18 complex locates to the extremities of the IM, whose spatial restriction requires the multispanning membrane protein Atg9. The Atg2–Atg18 complex tethers the ER to the leading edges of the growing IMs by simultaneously binding to the ER and the IM (Gómez-Sánchez et al. 2018; Kotani et al. 2018). Atg2 possesses lipid-transfer activity and the Atg2–Atg18 complex directly transfers phospholipids from the ER to the IM (Maeda et al. 2019; Osawa et al. 2019; Valverde et al. 2019). Phospholipids transported by Atg2 are translocated from the cytoplasmic to the luminal leaflet by the lipid scramblase Atg9, thus driving IM expansion (Osawa et al. 2019). Atg9, which traffics between mobile Atg9-positive vesicles and the PAS, also plays a role in organizing the PAS. Two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems function at multiple steps of autophagosome formation, including IM expansion, shaping, and closure (Mizushima and Komatsu 2011; Mizushima 2020; Nakatogawa 2020). Newly synthesized ubiquitin-like protein Atg8 is cleaved by the cysteine protease Atg4 to expose its C-terminal glycine, which is then conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) through the sequential actions of the E1-like activating enzyme Atg7 and the E2-like conjugating enzyme Atg3. The actions of Atg7 and the E2-like enzyme Atg10 mediate the conjugation of the ubiquitin-like protein Atg12 to Atg5. The Atg5–Atg12 conjugate further interacts with Atg16, which in turn acts as an E3-like enzyme to facilitate Atg8-PE conjugation (Mizushima 2020). Autophagosome sealing occurs concomitantly with disassociation of Atg proteins from the IM, which requires clearance of PI(3)P. Depletion of the myotubularin family PI(3)P phosphatase Ymr1 causes persistence of Atg proteins on autophagosomal membranes and inhibits subsequent fusion with vacuoles (Cebollero et al. 2012). ESCRT complex-mediated membrane abscission drives autophagosome closure (Takahashi et al. 2018, 2019; Zhen et al. 2020). Subsequent fusion of autophagosomes with the vacuole is mediated by the SNARE complex composed of Ykt6 on the autophagosome and Vam3, Vam7, and Vti1 on the vacuole (Bas et al. 2018). The vacuolar-localized phospholipase Atg15, a phospholipase B of broad substrate specificity, acts to disintegrate AB membranes (Kagohashi et al. 2023; Watanabe et al. 2023).
Table 1.
Autophagy-related genes and autophagy regulators in yeast, C. elegans, and mammals.
| Yeast ATG gene | C. elegans ATG homolog | Mammalian ATG homolog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atg1/ULK complex | atg1 | unc-51 | ULK1/ULK2 |
| atg13 | epg-1 | ATG13 | |
| atg17 | epg-7 | FIP200/RB1CC1 | |
| epg-9 | ATG101 | ||
| Class III (PI(3)K) Vps34 complex | atg6/vps30 | bec-1 | BECN1 |
| vps34 | vps-34 | PIK3C3/VPS34 | |
| vps15 | vps-15 | PIK3R4/VPS15 | |
| atg14 | epg-8 | ATG14L | |
| PI3P binding complex | atg18 | atg-18, epg-6 | WIPI1, WIPI2, WIPI3, WIPI4 |
| atg2 | atg-2 | ATG2A, ATG2B | |
| atg9 | atg-9 | ATG9A, ATG9B | |
| Atg8 ubiquitin-like conjugation system | atg4 | atg-4.1, atg-4.2 | ATG4A, ATG4B, ATG4C, ATG4D |
| atg3 | atg-3 | ATG3 | |
| atg7 | atg-7 | ATG7 | |
| atg8 | lgg-1/lgg-2 | LC3A, LC3B, LC3C, GABARAP, GABARAPL1, GABARAPL2 | |
| Atg12 ubiquitin-like conjugation system | atg5 | atg-5 | ATG5 |
| atg7 | atg-7 | ATG7 | |
| atg10 | atg-10 | ATG10 | |
| atg12 | lgg-3 | ATG12 | |
| atg16 | atg-16.1, atg-16.2 | ATG16L1, ATG16L2 | |
| Autophagosome maturation | mtm-3 | MTMR3 | |
| epg-5 | mEPG5 | ||
| vam3 | syx-17 | STX17 | |
| snap-29 | SNAP29 | ||
| ogt-1 | OGT | ||
| vamp-7 | VAMP8 | ||
| ypt7 | rab-7 | RAB7A | |
| vti1 | vti-1 | VTI1a, VT1b | |
| cup-14 | PLEKHM1 | ||
| Autophagy-related | epg-2 | ||
| epg-3 | VMP1 | ||
| epg-4 | EI24 | ||
| lpla-2 | PLA2G15 | ||
| sepa-1 | |||
| rub-1 | RUBCN/RUBICON | ||
| kog1 | daf-15 | RPTOR | |
| tsc11 | rict-1 | RICTOR | |
| rhb1 | rheb-1 | RHEB | |
| ced-9 | BCL2 | ||
| vps4 | vps-4 | VPS4A, VPS4B, SKD1 | |
| ypt31, ypt32 | rab-11.1, rab-11.2 | RAB-11A | |
| ssa1-4 | hsp-70 | HSPA8/HSC70 | |
| hsc82, hsp82 | daf-21 | HSP90AA1 | |
| vps38 | T23G11.7, Y34BA.2 | UVRAG | |
| Regulate autophagy gene expression | TOR1, TOR2 | let-363/TOR | MTOR |
| hlh-30 | TFEB, TFE3 | ||
| daf-16 | FOXO | ||
| pha-4 | FOXA | ||
| impk | impk-1 | IMPK | |
| Selective autophagy receptor for ubiquitinated cargo | sqst-1 | SQST-1/p62 | |
| Selective autophagy– mitophagy | pdr-1 | PRKN | |
| pink-1 | PINK1 | ||
| dct-1 | BNIP3 | ||
| Selective autophagy– allophagy | fundc-1 | FUNDC1A | |
| phb2 | phb-2 | PHB2 | |
| allo-1a, allo-1b | |||
| cak1 | ikke-1 | TBK1 | |
| HOPS complex, for vesicle fusion | vps11 | vps-11 | VPS11 |
| vps18 | vps-18 | VPS18 | |
| vam6/vps39 | vps-39 | VPS39 | |
| vam2/vps41 | vps-41 | VPS41 | |
| vps16 | vps-16 | VPS16 | |
| vps33 | vps-33.1, vps-33.2 | VPS33A, VPS33B |
Fig. 2.
The differences in the autophagy pathway in yeast and multicellular animals. In yeast, autophagosomes are generated at a single site located on the vacuole, known as the PAS. The ER is enriched in the perinuclear and cortical regions. The leading edges of the growing IM form contacts with the ER. Nascent autophagosomes directly fuse with the vacuole. cER, cortical ER; nER, perinuclear ER; IM, isolation membrane. In mammalian cells, the ER is widely distributed in the cytosol. IMs are simultaneously formed at multiple sites on the ER. The expanding IMs form extensive and highly dynamic contacts with the ER. Nascent autophagosomes fuse with vesicles originating from endolysosomal compartments to form intermediates called amphisomes and eventually degradative autolysosomes, a process known as autophagosome maturation. EE, early endosome; LE, late endosome; MVB, multivesicular body; PM, plasma membrane.
Fig. 3.
The function of ATG proteins at different steps of autophagosome formation. ATG proteins act at different steps of autophagosome formation. See the main text for the detailed function of each ATG protein. Steps are executed by distinct complexes of proteins: (1) Initiation is executed by the UNC-51/Atg1/ULK1 initiation complex; (2) Membrane nucleation is executed by the class III PtdIns 3-kinase nucleation complex; (3) IM or phagophore formation requires the PtdIns3P-binding complex; (4) Elongation of the IM or phagophore requires the LGG-3/Atg12 conjugation system and the Atg8/LGG-1 or LGG-2 conjugation system; (5) The fusion of the autophagosome with a lysosome to form an autolysosome is mediated by a SNARE complex, which consists of STX-17/Syntaxin 17 (a t-SNARE protein) on autophagosomes, SNAP-29 (a SNARE protein), and the endosomal/lysosomal R-SNARE VAMP-7 (Itakura et al. 2008). This fusion process is regulated by several factors, including the late endosomal/lysosomal-localized protein PLEKHM1 and TECPR1 (which interacts with PtdIns(3)P and the Atg12-Atg5 conjugate) (Chen et al. 2013; McEwan et al. 2015). For all proteins, we indicate the C. elegans protein first and the yeast ortholog and the mammalian ortholog. As part of the conjugation system LGG-1 or LGG-2 is cleaved by ATG-4.1 or ATG-4.2 and conjugated to PE on the autophagosome membrane, which incorporates pre-autophagosomal and autophagosomal membranes.
In mammalian cells, Atg proteins may be differentially employed due to the assembly of autophagosomes on the ER (Table 1 and Fig. 2). For example, the composition and regulatory mode of the Atg1 complex differ substantially between yeast and mammals. The mammalian counterpart of the Atg1 complex consists of ULK1, FIP200, ATG13 (a highly divergent homolog of Atg13), and ATG101 (Mizushima 2010; Feng et al. 2014). Despite its high sequence diversity, FIP200 may be a functional counterpart of yeast Atg17. ATG101 is absent in budding yeast (Mizushima 2010; Liang et al. 2012). Upon starvation, the ULK1/ATG13/FIP200 complex forms ER-associated puncta (Itakura and Mizushima 2010). Autophagy stimuli elicit Ca2+ transients on the ER outer surface that further drive LLPS of the ULK1/FIP200 complex (Zheng et al. 2023). The resultant FIP200 condensates associate with the ER via interaction with VAPA/B and ATL2/3 and organize into autophagosome formation sites (Zheng et al. 2022). The VPS34 complex, consisting of VPS34, Atg6/Beclin 1, VPS15 and a highly divergent Atg14 homolog, Atg14L, is then recruited to generate PI(3)P (Feng et al. 2014). ATG9 vesicles also contribute to the organization of autophagosome initiation sites, while their function in autophagosome formation remains elusive (Yamamoto et al. 2012). IMs forms extensive and highly dynamic contacts with the ER, which may allow lipid transport from the ER to IMs at the contact sites (Hayashi-Nishino et al. 2009; Yla-Anttila et al. 2009). The ER-IM contact is tethered by the interaction of the integral ER proteins VAPA, VAPB, ATL2, and ATL3 with components of the FIP200–ULK1 complex, and also interactions among ATG proteins and PI(3)P located at the ER and IMs (Zhao et al. 2017, 2018; Liu et al. 2021b).
Mammalian cells possess multiple homologs of the same yeast Atg proteins, which show functional redundancy, as well as functional divergence. This confers another layer of complexity. Mammalian cells contain six ATG8 homologs, three in the LC3 subfamily (LC3A, LC3B, and LC3C) and three in the GABARAP subfamily (GABARAP, GABARAPL1, and GABARAPL2). In cells depleted of all six ATG8s, autophagosome closure is severely delayed and the autophagosomes are smaller (Nguyen et al. 2016). There are four mammalian homologs of yeast Atg18, WIPI1-4, with distinct function in autophagy (Proikas-Cezanne et al. 2015). WIPI2 directly interacts with ATG16 and defines the action site for the ATG16-ATG12-ATG5 complex, and also contributes to the formation of ER-IM contacts (Dooley et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2017). WIPI4 shows stronger interaction with ATG2A/B than WIPI1 and WIPI2 (Zheng et al. 2017). The ESCRT complex drives the closure of IMs into autophagosomes (Yu and Melia 2017; Takahashi et al. 2018). Fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes/lysosomes is mediated by two partially functionally redundant SNARE complexes formed by autophagosomal membrane-localized STX17 (Qa) and SNAP29 (Qbc) and late endosomal/lysosomal-localized VAMP8, or by the autophagosomal YKT6, SNAP29, and STX7 (Matsui et al. 2018).
In C. elegans, homologs of Atg1-10, Atg12, Atg16, and Atg18 are conserved and are also essential for autophagy (Table 1; Figs. 1 and 3). C. elegans has two homologs of yeast Atg4 (C. elegansatg-4.1 and atg-4.2), Atg8 (C. eleganslgg-1 and lgg-2), and Atg16 (C. elegansatg-16.1 and atg-16.2) (Wu et al. 2012, 2015; Zhang et al. 2013). atg-16.2 mutants exhibit a stronger autophagic defect (i.e. accumulation of protein aggregates and formation of LGG-1 puncta) than atg-16.1 mutants. atg-16.2; atg-16.1 double mutants display a much more severe defect than either single mutant (Zhang et al. 2013). Loss of atg-4.1 activity causes defective degradation of a variety of protein aggregates, whereas atg-4.2 mutants show no defects (Wu et al. 2012). atg-4.1 and atg-4.2 function redundantly in LGG-1 processing. ATG-4.1 preferentially cleaves the soluble pro-form of LGG-1 for its conjugation onto the autophagosome, while ATG-4.2 preferentially cleaves autophagic membrane-bound to LGG-1/LGG-2 (Wu et al. 2012; Hill et al. 2019). Loss of function of atg-4.2 causes the accumulation of immature autophagosomes in neurons (Hill et al. 2019). LGG-1 and LGG-2 in C. elegans, which belong to the GABARAP and LC3 families, respectively, act differentially in autophagy (Wu et al. 2015). LGG-1 is closer to the yeast Atg8 and could complement the loss of viability of ATG8-disrupted yeast under nutrient starvation, whereas LGG-2 failed to complement in parallel experiments (Alberti et al. 2010). LGG-1 is essential for the degradation of various protein aggregates, while LGG-2 has cargo-specific and developmental stage-specific roles. LGG-1 depletion blocks autophagosome formation, while loss of LGG-2 causes the formation of smaller autophagosomes (Wu et al. 2015). LGG-2 also participates in maturation of paternal organelle-containing autophagosomes during embryogenesis via direct interaction with the HOPS complex subunit-VPS-39 (see below) (Manil-Ségalen et al. 2014; Djeddi et al. 2015). Loss of function of the C. elegans myotubularin family PI(3)P phosphatase MTM-3 causes persistent association of ATG-18 and impairs autophagosome maturation (Wu et al. 2014). The STX-17-SNAP29-VAMP-7 complex appears to mediate the fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes/lysosomes (Guo et al. 2014b).
Identifying novel components of the autophagy pathway in C. elegans
Forward genetic screens in C. elegans have yielded conserved components originally identified in yeast screens, underscoring the conservation of basic mechanisms, as well as novel genes that lack yeast homologs but are conserved in mammals, underscoring the value of a metazoan genetic system for studying autophagy. Genetic screens for genes that are essential for degradation of protein substrates during C. elegans embryogenesis (see below, Fig. 4) identified highly conserved atg genes. C. elegans also contains highly divergent functional homologs of Atg13 and Atg14, encoded by epg-1 (ectopic PGL granules) and epg-8, respectively (Table 1 and Fig. 5) (Tian et al. 2009, 2010a, 2010b; Lu et al. 2011; Yang and Zhang 2011; Liang et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2015). epg-9 encodes the mammalian ATG101 homolog (Liang et al. 2012). EPG-7 displays similarity to FIP200, but it is not essential for autophagy (Lin et al. 2013). Genetic screens also identified several genes, including epg-3, -4, and -5, whose homologs are found in mammals but are absent in yeast (Table 1 and Fig. 4) (Tian et al. 2010a). epg-3 and epg-4 encode ER transmembrane proteins and act at an early step of autophagosome formation (Fig. 5) (Zhao et al. 2017; Zheng et al. 2022). EI24/EPG4 (mammalian homolog of EPG-4) controls the frequency, amplitude, and duration of ER Ca2+ transients. In EI24 KO cells, persistent ER Ca2+ transients cause accumulation of FIP200 puncta and LC3 structures that are not functional (Zheng et al. 2022). VMP1/EPG3 (mammalian homolog of EPG-3) modulates the disassembly of the ER-IM contacts (Fig. 5). VMP1 depletion causes stable association of IMs with the ER, so that IMs fail to proceed into closed autophagosomes (Zhao et al. 2017). C. elegans genetic screens also identified EPG-6, which like ATG-18, also contains WD40 repeat PtdIns(3)P-binding domains. EPG-6, but not ATG-18, binds to ATG-2 (Fig. 5) (Lu et al. 2011). Genetic epistasis analysis placed ATG-18 upstream of EPG-6 in the autophagy pathway (Lu et al. 2011). The molecular mechanism of ATG-18 in autophagosome formation has yet to be determined.
Fig. 4.
Accumulation of PGL granules in somatic cells in autophagy gene mutant embryos. a) Schematic illustration of localization of the oocyte-derived P granules during early asymmetric divisions generating somatic and germline cells in C. elegans embryos (left). P granules are indicated as small green dots. b) Three-dimensional projection images of the distribution of GFP::PGL-3-labeled granules in wild-type embryos, atg-3 mutant embryos and epg-5 mutant embryos. The Z2 and Z3 germ precursor cells are indicated by red arrows.
Fig. 5.
The role of epg genes identified from C. elegans genetic screens in the aggrephagy pathway. Schematic illustration of the role and the hierarchical order of autophagy proteins in the aggrephagy pathway in C. elegans. LE, late endosome. EPG-11 and LET-363/mTOR mediate posttranslational modification (PTM) of PGL-1 and PGL-3. EPG-11 encodes the PRMT1 homolog and mediates arginine methylation in the RGG (Arg–Gly–Gly) domains of PGL-1 and PGL-3 (Li et al. 2012). EPG-11- and LET-363-mediated PTMs modulate phase separation of PGL-1 and PGL-3 (Zhang et al. 2018). See the main text for the detailed function of each EPG protein.
Membrane fusion is promoted by a family of tethering factors that act at the initial capture of transport vesicles and accelerate the assembly of SNARE complexes for fusion with target membranes. Tethering factors are targeted to cognate membranes by binding to activated forms of small GTPases, phospholipids, and SNARE proteins (Jahn and Scheller 2006; Yu and Hughson 2010; Langemeyer et al. 2018). epg-5, which is essential for the formation of degradative autolysosomes, encodes a tether to confer the fusion specificity of autophagosomes with late endosomes/lysosomes (Tian et al. 2010a; Wang et al. 2016). Loss of mammalian EPG5 causes accumulation of autophagosomes and nondegradative autolysosomes due to nonspecific fusion of autophagosomes with other endocytic vesicles such as recycling endosomes (Wang et al. 2016). EPG5 is a RAB7 effector and localizes on late endosomes/lysosomes. EPG5 recognizes autophagosomes by directly binding to LC3 associated with the outer autophagosomal membrane. EPG5 stabilizes and facilitates the assembly of STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 SNARE complexes (Wang et al. 2016). Other tethering factors such as PLEKHM1 and the HOPS complex also ensure fusion fidelity and efficiency during autophagosome maturation (Jiang et al. 2014; Takáts et al. 2014; McEwan et al. 2015).
The lysosomal-localized LPLA-2 (C. elegans homolog of the lysosomal phospholipase A2 family protein PLA2G15) is essential for degradation of autophagic membranous contents (Li et al. 2022). Loss of lpla-2 activity causes accumulation of enlarged lysosomes, containing autophagic vesicles, undigested membranes, and autophagy cargos. Knockdown of PLA2G15 in mammalian cells also causes accumulation of enlarged lysosomes with intact autophagic vesicles (Li et al. 2022). In summary, characterization of autophagy genes identified from C. elegans facilitates our molecular understanding of steps unique to autophagy in multicellular organisms.
Regulation of autophagy activity under physiological conditions
Studies of yeast and cultured cells have identified numerous factors that integrate various stressors into the autophagic machinery to control autophagy activity (Russell et al. 2014). The Atg1/ULK complex and the VPS34 complex are the two most extensively studied nodes for integrating the status of nutrients, cellular energy, and various signaling pathways with autophagy regulation (Russell et al. 2014). mTORC1- and AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of components of the ULK1/FIP200/ATG13 complex regulate the kinase activity of ULK1 (Russell et al. 2014). In C. elegans, inactivation of let-363/mTOR and activated aak-2/AMPK also elevate autophagy activity (Lin et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2019). Suppressor screens in C. elegans have revealed multiple mechanisms that modulate autophagy activity under physiological conditions.
Transcriptional control of autophagy genes
RNAi screens for gene inactivation that suppresses the accumulation of aggregates of the autophagy substrate SQST-1/p62 in rpl-43 mutants, which exhibit impaired function of ribosomal protein RPL-43, revealed that autophagy genes can be transcriptionally induced by inactivation of the TGF-β Sma/Mad pathway and the lin-35 SynMuv B pathway, and by the transcription factor PHA-4/FOXA, the XBP-1-mediated ER stress pathway, and the mitochondrial stress pathway mediated by the bZip transcription factor ATFS-1 (Guo et al. 2014a). Several other transcription factors are also involved in modulating the expression level of autophagy and lysosome genes under different conditions (see the “Autophagy in Longevity–Regulation of autophagy for longevity” section, Table 1). Thus, transcriptional regulation of autophagy genes is a widely employed mechanism to control autophagy activity by various developmental signals and stresses.
Modulation of autophagosome maturation
Accumulation of nondegradative autolysosomes is a key feature of disorders such as neurodegenerative diseases (Settembre et al. 2008; Vergarajauregui et al. 2008; Zhao et al. 2021). Impaired autophagosome maturation caused by autophagy gene deficiency may be attenuated by promoting the activity of a partially redundant mechanism in this process (Zheng et al. 2022). Genetic screens for suppressors of the autophagy defect in epg-5 mutants revealed multiple mechanisms to modulate autophagosome maturation.
ogt-1
Mutations in ogt-1, encoding O-linked -N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase, were identified to suppress the accumulation of SQST-1/p62 aggregates in epg-5(tm3425) null mutant embryos (Guo et al. 2014a, 2014b). OGT mediates O-GlcNAcylation of SNAP-29 at multiple serine/threonine residues (Ser70, Ser134, Thr143, and Ser249). A transgene expressing O-GlcNAcylation-defective SNAP29 promotes autophagic flux in C. elegans. OGT knockdown also elevates autophagic flux in mammalian cells by facilitating autophagosome maturation. SNAP29 is O-GlcNAcylated at Ser2, Ser61, Thr130, and Ser153. O-GlcNAc modification attenuates the interaction of SNAP29 with STX17 and VAMP8, while expression of O-GlcNAcylation-defective SNAP29 facilitates the formation of SNAP29-containing SNARE complexes (Guo et al. 2014b). Levels of UDP-GlcNAc, the donor for O-GlcNAc addition, are responsive to the availability of glucose, fatty acids, uridine, and glutamine (Slawson et al. 2010). The levels of UDP-GlcNAc and O-GlcNAc-modified SNAP29 are dramatically reduced by nutrient starvation and in starved worms. Thus, SNAP29 O-GlcNAcylation serves as a cellular mechanism for integrating nutrient availability with autophagosome maturation (Guo et al. 2014b).
susr-2
Loss-of-function mutation in susr-2(bp1356), which encodes an ER transmembrane protein, also suppresses the accumulation of SQST-1/p62::GFP aggregates in epg-5 null mutants (Miao et al. 2020). susr-2(bp1356) promotes delivery and/or maturation of lysosomal hydrolytic enzymes. SUSR2/TMEM39A knockdown also suppresses the autophagy defect caused by EPG5 deficiency in mammalian cells. SUSR2 acts as an adaptor protein for efficient export of the ER-localized PI(4)P phosphatase SAC1 from the ER, which in turn regulates the spatial distribution and levels of PI(4)P. Depletion of SUSR-2 elevates late endosomal/lysosomal PI(4)P levels, facilitating recruitment of the HOPS complex to promote assembly of the SNARE complex for autophagosome maturation (Miao et al. 2020).
ipmk-1
Loss-of-function mutation in ipmk-1(bp1075), which encodes the ortholog of inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK), suppresses the accumulation of SQST-1/p62 aggregates in epg-5 mutants (Chen et al. 2020). IPMK-1 regulates autophagy independent of its catalytic activity which generates inositol tetrakis- and pentakisphosphates (e.g. IP4 and IP5) (Chen et al. 2020). ipmk-1(bp1075) mutants contain more lysosomes than control animals and show enhanced delivery and/or maturation of lysosomal hydrolytic enzymes (Chen et al. 2020). In mammalian cells, IPMK knockout elevates lysosomal function and biogenesis and suppresses the autophagy defect caused by EPG5 deficiency (Chen et al. 2020). The helix–loop–helix protein TFEB is a well-characterized transcription factor that activates genes essential for the autophagy-lysosomal pathway (Settembre et al. 2008). Nuclear-localized IPMK negatively regulates the transcriptional activity of TFEB by acting as a chaperone to inhibit LLPS of TFEB, which is involved in gene transcription (Chen et al. 2020).
rbg-1 and rbg-2
Upon degradation of the sequestrated materials, lysosomes are regenerated from autolysosomes to sustain autophagic flux (Yu et al. 2010). Dynamics movement of RAB-7 is essential for lysosomal biogenesis. RAB-7 release may promote the transport of lysosomal enzymes and/or lysosomal membrane proteins (Wang and Zhang 2019; Zhao and Zhang 2019a). In epg-5 mutants, the mobility of late endosome/lysosome-associated RAB-7 is reduced, which may lead to recruitment of effectors such as HOPS to promote abnormal fusion and also inhibit membrane remodeling. Mutations in rbg-1 and rbg-2, whose encoded proteins form a complex, ameliorate the autophagy defect in epg-5 null mutants (Wang and Zhang 2019). The RBG-1/RBG-2 complex modulates the dynamics of membrane-associated RAB-7 to regulate lysosomal biogenesis and function. Expression of the GDP-bound form of RAB-7 also promotes lysosomal biogenesis and suppresses the autophagy defect in epg-5 mutants (Wang and Zhang 2019).
Taken together, the above-mentioned studies show that facilitating specific fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes/lysosomes or remodeling of stalled nondegradative autolysosomes can attenuate the autophagy defect caused by EPG5 deficiency (Guo et al. 2014b; Wang and Zhang 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Miao et al. 2020). Vici syndrome is a progressive multisystem disease caused by mutations in EPG5. Patient tissues, as in epg-5 mutant animals (Fig. 4, a and b), accumulate nondegradative autolysosomes (Cullup et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2016). Thus, uncovering mechanisms that suppress the autophagy defect, provides insights into the pathogenesis and also therapeutic treatments of Vici syndrome.
Systemic regulation of autophagy
In multicellular organisms, autophagy activity is systemically coordinated to ameliorate deleterious effects elicited by locally imposed stresses such as nutrient restriction, and also to maintain cellular homeostasis at an organismal level (Fenouille et al. 2017). In C. elegans, a circuit has been revealed that senses and transduces cuticle damage to elicit a long-range organism-wide autophagy response (Zhang et al. 2019). The outer layer of the cuticle in C. elegans contains two discrete interacting groups of collagens that constitute alternating parallel circumferential bands, known as annuli and annular furrows (McMahon et al. 2003). Loss of function of annular furrow collagen genes activates autophagy in multiple tissues, including the hypodermis, intestine, and muscle (Zhang et al. 2019). This systemic response is sensed and triggered by sensory neurons with cuticle-embedded cilial endings. The TGF-β-like molecule DAF-7/TGF-β, secreted from the ASI pair of ciliated neurons, activates a canonical TGFβ signaling pathway in distant tissues to induce autophagy (Zhang et al. 2019). Amino acids modulate the activity of the metabotropic glutamate receptor homologs MGL-1 and MGL-2 in the AIY and AIB interneurons, respectively, to regulate systemic autophagy responses (Kang and Avery 2009), but the circuit mediating this response has yet to be determined.
Selective autophagy
Protein aggregates or damaged/superfluous organelles can be selectively removed by autophagy (Stolz et al. 2014). A family of receptor proteins that simultaneously bind to cargo and Atg8/LC3 is essential for recognizing specific cargos for degradation. For example, SQST-1/p62, which contains a self-oligomerization PB1 domain, an LC3-interacting LIR motif and a UBA ubiquitin binding domain, functions as a receptor to mediate aggregation, and autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated misfolded proteins (Stolz et al. 2014; Gatica et al. 2018; Lamark and Johansen 2021). Studies of autophagic degradation of protein aggregates and paternal mitochondria during C. elegans embryogenesis have impacted our understanding of selective autophagy.
Degradation of P granule components in somatic cells
Receptor and scaffold protein are involved in degradation of PGL granules
During early embryogenesis, the oocyte-derived P granules, which are specialized protein-RNA aggregates, become localized exclusively in the germ blastomeres P1, P2, P3, and P4 during asymmetric cell divisions, and eventually in the two germ precursor cells, Z2 and Z3, derived from P4 (Strome 2005). One mechanism for such asymmetric localization is rapid disassembly and removal of P granules that are partitioned into somatic blastomeres (Hird et al. 1996; DeRenzo et al. 2003). The RGG box-containing P granule proteins PGL-1 and PGL-3 (collectively called PGL proteins) are degraded by autophagy in somatic cells, but accumulate into a large number of aggregates, called PGL granules, in autophagy mutants (Fig. 4, a and b) (Zhang et al. 2009). Genetic screens have identified that sepa-1 and epg-2 are required for removal of PGL proteins (Zhang et al. 2009; Tian et al. 2010a) (Fig. 5). In sepa-1 mutant embryos, PGL proteins fail to be removed and are diffusely localized in the cytoplasm of somatic cells (Zhang et al. 2009), while in epg-2 mutants, PGL proteins form aggregates but are not colocalized with LGG-1-positive autophagic structures (Tian et al. 2010a). SEPA-1 self-oligomerizes and also interacts with PGL-3 and LGG-1, acting as the receptor for formation and degradation of PGL granules (Zhang et al. 2009). EPG-2 also self-oligomerizes and functions as a scaffold by directly interacting with SEPA-1 and multiple Atg proteins (Tian et al. 2010a). SEPA-1 and EPG-2 are zygotically synthesized and display characteristic temporal expression patterns. SEPA-1 aggregates are detectable at the ∼24-cell stage, peak at the ∼100 cell stage and become undetectable at the comma stage. The temporal EPG-2 expression pattern partially overlaps with SEPA-1 (Noda et al. 2020). SEPA-1 and EPG-2 are degraded by autophagy in a manner independent of PGL granules (Zhang et al. 2017b).
Phase separation and transition control assembly and degradation of PGL granules
Autophagy activity occurs at a basal level during embryogenesis and presumably the autophagosomes are relatively uniformly sized. Removal of the diffuse oocyte-loaded PGL-1/-3 proteins requires mechanisms that ensure the coordination of the assembly rate and size of PGL granules with autophagic flux during embryogenesis (Wang and Zhang 2019). The assembly of protein aggregates can be driven by LLPS. The resultant liquid-like aggregates further undergo phase transition to form gel-like or solid structures (Wang and Zhang 2019; Noda et al. 2020). SEPA-1 and EPG-2 act concertedly to specify phase separation and transition of PGL proteins (Zhang et al. 2018). In vitro LLPS assays showed that PGL-1/-3/SEPA-1 undergo LLPS and the resultant droplets exhibit liquid-like properties, including fusion capability and highly mobile interior molecules (Zhang et al. 2018). SEPA-1 acts in a concentration-dependent manner to lower the critical concentration of PGL-1/-3 for LLPS. SEPA-1 homogenously disperses into PGL-1/-3 droplets (Zhang et al. 2018). PGL-1/-3 levels are gradually reduced as development proceeds during embryogenesis (Zhang et al. 2009). The increased SEPA-1 level promotes condensation of low levels of diffuse PGL-1/-3 into aggregates for degradation. Addition of EPG-2 leads to transition of PGL-1/-3/SEPA-1 droplets to a gel-like state, which show low mobility and remain smaller in size over time. EPG-2 coats the surface of PGL granules (Zhang et al. 2018). In autophagy mutants, EPG-2 encircles PGL granules and reduces the mobility of PGL proteins (Zhang et al. 2018). Missense mutations in PGL-1 that promote gelation of PGL granules render their degradation independent of EPG-2 (Zhang et al. 2018). Thus, the gel state of PGL granules is essential for their autophagic degradation.
Stress-controlled RNA recruitment switches the fate of PGL granules from autophagic degradation to accumulation
Surprisingly, in embryos laid by animals grown under heat-stress conditions, PGL proteins escape autophagic degradation and accumulate into a large number of granules to confer a stress adaptation function (Zhang et al. 2018). mTORC1, but not mTORC2, is required for PGL granules to evade degradation (Zhang et al. 2018). LET-363/mTOR phosphorylates PGL-1/-3, whose level is significantly elevated in embryos laid under heat-stress conditions. Phosphorylated PGL-1/-3 facilitate LLPS. EPG-2 still undergoes autophagic degradation under heat-stress conditions. Its level does not correlate with the enhanced rate of PGL granule formation and is not sufficient to make PGL granules amenable to degradation (Zhang et al. 2018). The insufficient targeting of EPG-2 appears to be due to partitioning of mRNAs into PGL granules (Zheng et al. 2023). In autophagy mutants, mRNAs are absent from PGL granules formed at normal temperatures. PGL granules formed under heat-stress conditions are enriched in mRNAs (Zheng et al. 2023). In the in vitro LLPS assay, mRNAs promote the formation and liquidity of PGL granules, and also inhibit the recruitment of EPG-2. Depleting factors involved in mRNA processing, transport or translation reduces the recruitment of mRNAs, resulting in the recruitment of EPG-2 to PGL granules and subsequent autophagic degradation (Zheng et al. 2023). Therefore, sorting of RNAs into PGL granules controls the recruitment of EPG-2, acting as a switch for their accumulation to provide a fitness advantage under heat stress.
SQST-1/p62 and miRISC
The C. elegans SQSTM1/p62 homolog SQST-1 is removed by autophagy. SQST-1/p62 is diffusely distributed at a low level in the cytoplasm in wild-type embryos, but accumulates into a large number of aggregates in autophagy mutants (Tian et al. 2010a). The self-oligomerizing protein EPG-7 functions as the scaffold protein for degradation of SQST-1/p62 (Lin et al. 2013). EPG-7 directly interacts with SQST-1/p62 and also associates with multiple autophagy proteins, including LGG-1, LGG-3/Atg12, ATG-18, and ATG-9 (Lin et al. 2013). The scaffold protein may recruit core Atg proteins to trigger the formation of surrounding autophagosomal membranes.
The miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) in C. elegans contains Argonaute (Ago), miRNA, and AIN-1, a member of the GW182 family of proteins (Zhang and Zhang 2013). Compared to wild-type animals, AIN-1 is present at higher levels in autophagy mutants and accumulates into a large number of aggregates that colocalize with SQST-1/p62 aggregates. Degradation of AIN-1 also requires EPG-7 (Zhang and Zhang 2013). Therefore, autophagy participates in diverse miRNA-regulated biological processes by controlling the miRISC level.
Clearance of paternal mitochondria and MOs
Animal offspring only inherit the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) from the female parent (Al Rawi et al. 2011; Sato and Sato 2011). In C. elegans, paternal mitochondria and mtRNA are selectively degraded by autophagy (Al Rawi et al. 2011; Sato and Sato 2011). In two- and four-cell-stage embryos, paternal mitochondria are partitioned into blastomeres, then they are gradually eliminated, becoming almost undetectable at the 16-cell stage. In autophagy mutants, they persist in late-stage embryos and L1 larvae (Sato and Sato 2011). The specialized sperm-specific post-Golgi organelles, called membranous organelles (MOs), are also degraded by autophagy (Al Rawi et al. 2011). Degradation of paternal mitochondria and MOs (collectively called paternal organelles) is known as allophagy [i.e. allogeneic (nonself) organelle autophagy] (Sato et al. 2018). After fertilization, paternal mitochondria and MOs triggers the recruitment of the receptor ALLO-1 for autophagic degradation. Loss of function of allo-1 causes accumulation of paternal organelles (Sato et al. 2018). ALLO-1 has two isoforms (i.e. ALLO-1a and ALLO-1b) with different C-terminal sequences. MOs and paternal mitochondria are recognized by ALLO-1a and ALLO-1b, respectively (Sasaki et al. 2024). Successful allophagy depends on IKKE-1, a C. elegans homolog of the TBK1 and IKKε kinases. IKKE-1 interacts and phosphorylates ALLO-1 and/or autophagy-related proteins, for example, EPG-7/ATG-11, resulting in accumulation of ALLO-1 and autophagy-related proteins (e.g. EPG-7) around the cargo (Sato et al. 2018; Sasaki et al. 2024). ALLO-1 and IKKE-1 are maternally expressed (Sato et al. 2018). After fertilization, MOs are rapidly ubiquitinated, while the ubiquitination status of paternal mitochondria is unclear (Al Rawi et al. 2011; Sato et al. 2018; Molina et al. 2019). Paternal mitochondria selectively express the ubiquitin-independent mitophagy receptor-FNDC-1 (C. elegans ortholog of FUNDC1), whose loss of function specifically delays the elimination of paternal mitochondria, but not MOs (Lim et al. 2019). The inner mitochondrial membrane protein PHB2 acts as a receptor for autophagic degradation of damaged mitochondria. Paternal inactivation of phb-2 in C. elegans causes accumulation of paternal mitochondria (Wei et al. 2017). Thus, multiple mechanisms utilizing different receptors are involved in autophagic degradation of paternal mitochondria in fertilized embryos.
Monitoring autophagy in C. elegans
Multiple methods, including analyzing the dynamics of LGG-1 and LGG-2 reporters (e.g. GFP::LGG-1, GFP::LGG-2), western blot assay and immunofluorescence analysis of LGG-1 and LGG-2, analyzing the degradation of autophagy substrates (e.g. SQST-1/p62, PGL granules), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy have been developed to monitor autophagy in C. elegans. These methods have been extensively described (Jenzer et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015a; Chen et al. 2017b; Largeau and Legouis 2019; Springhorn and Hoppe 2019). Here, we only give a brief introduction about the widely used methods to monitor autophagy in C. elegans.
The LGG-1 reporter
GFP::LGG-1
The Atg8/LC3 reporter is widely used to monitor autophagy in yeast, C. elegans and mammalian cells (Meléndez et al. 2003; Klionsky et al. 2021). GFP::LGG-1 forms puncta in various cell types during development. The GFP signal is quenched in acidic environments. Thus, GFP::LGG-1-labeled puncta represent IMs, autophagosomes, and unacidified amphisomes (Zhang et al. 2015a; Chang et al. 2017). The dual-fluorescent mCherry::GFP::LGG-1 reporter labels these structures (detected as mCherry/GFP double-positive puncta), and also acidified amphisomes and autolysosomes (detected as mCherry-only puncta) (Chang et al. 2017). The number of LGG-1-positive puncta can be increased by induction of autophagy or by a block in autophagy downstream of autophagosome initiation (Zhang et al. 2015a; Chang et al. 2017). The LGG-1 reporter can also be incorporated into protein aggregates (Zhang et al. 2015a). Additional methods described below should also be performed to confirm the occurrence of autophagy.
Degradation of autophagy substrates
The removal of autophagy substrates including PGL granules, SQST-1 aggregates, and paternal organelles can be used to evaluate autophagy activity in embryos (Zhang et al. 2015a). Accumulation of SQST-1/p62 aggregates at larval and adult stages may be due to elevated expression of SQST-1/p62 or targeting of SQST-1/p62 to aggregates formed by misfolded proteins or damaged organelles (Zhang et al. 2015a). Thus, caution is needed when autophagic flux is monitored in larval and adult animals. Additional assays, for example, quantifying the number of GFP::LGG-1 puncta, should be used to examine autophagy (Zhang et al. 2015a; Chang et al. 2020).
Transmission electron microscopy
The ultrastructure of autophagic membranes/vesicles and also the engulfed cytoplasmic contents can be directly visualized by TEM (Meléndez et al. 2003, 2008; Tian et al. 2010a; Wu et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015a). TEM analysis revealed that different stages of autophagic structures accumulate in different autophagy gene mutants. For example, IMs, which are extremely rare in wild-type embryos, accumulate in epg-3, epg-4, epg-6, atg-2, and atg-18 mutant embryos (Tian et al. 2010a; Lu et al. 2011). Small autophagosomes are formed in lgg-2 mutant embryos, while epg-5 mutants accumulate unfused autophagosomes and nondegradative autolysosomes (Wu et al. 2015; Wang and Zhang 2019). The unambiguously identification of specific autophagic structures confirmed the molecular function of these autophagy genes in the pathway.
Autophagy in stress
Autophagy occurs at basal levels in nearly all cell types, but it is increased by diverse intracellular and extracellular cues or in the adaptation to environmental stress. All tissues carry out autophagy (Chapin et al. 2015; Chang et al. 2017). The first documentation of a role of autophagy in a multicellular organism in response to stress reported that autophagy genes were required for animals to undergo the remodeling that occurs during dauer formation (Meléndez et al. 2003) (see Autophagy in development section). Under high temperature, high population density or starvation conditions, young larvae (past the L1 stage) arrest as dauers, a specialized state in which animals can survive for several months (Cassada and Russell 1975; Albert et al. 1981; Golden and Riddle 1982). Dauer animals change their physiology and metabolism to survive long term. Autophagy is also required for the survival of newly hatched L1 larvae upon starvation (Kang et al. 2007).
Nearly, two decades of research involving the genetic ablation of the autophagy machinery in diverse animal models or cell culture systems has shown how autophagy is a central mechanism by which cells response to stress stimuli, such as starvation, metabolic stress, heat stress, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and exercise (Levine and Kroemer 2019; Mizushima and Komatsu 2011).
In C. elegans, a mild heat shock (1 h at 36°C) when applied to young adult animals triggers a hermetic response, triggers autophagy, and extends lifespan (Kumsta et al. 2017). A severe and more acute heat shock (1 h at 37°C) of young adults, or L4 larvae, induces the transient fragmentation of mitochondria, the formation of aggregates in the matrix and mitophagy, a DCT-1-, PINK-1-, and PDR-1-dependent process (Palikaras et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2021b). In response to acute stress, autophagosomes form on mitochondria and protect larvae from acute heat shock and facilitate the mitochondrial rebuilding via a DRP-1-dependent process (Chen et al. 2021b), suggesting a functional link between mitochondrial fission and autophagosomal biogenesis. The adaptation to acute heat shock does not appear to require PDR-1, PINK-1, DCT-1, or FNDC-1 (FUN14 domain containing 1, proteins involved in various selective mitophagy processes) (Chen et al. 2021b). Thus, part of the fragmented mitochondria can be resulting from a yet unidentified mitophagy pathway or through bulk autophagy. Studies in C. elegans muscle cells exposed to various stresses suggest a balance response between PINK-1/PDR-1-dependent mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis (Palikaras et al. 2015) (see mitophagy in Longevity section).
Hypoxia in C. elegans results in an increase in LGG-1-positive fluorescently labeled foci (Samokhvalov et al. 2008). RNAi depletion of bec-1/Becn1, lgg-1,lgg-2, or a mutation in unc-51/Atg1 decreased animal survival after severe hypoxic injury (Samokhvalov et al. 2008). The hypersensitivity phenotype of bec-1/Becn1 RNAi-depleted animals could be blocked by loss-of-function mutations in either the apoptosis (ced-3) or necrosis (crt-1) pathway (Samokhvalov et al. 2008). Thus, it appears that inhibition of autophagy sensitizes animals to hypoxic injury and that this sensitization is no longer functional when either of the two cell death mechanisms are inhibited (Samokhvalov et al. 2008).
A small increase of glucose in the C. elegans diet results in a shortened lifespan (Lee et al. 2009). Excess glucose levels increase the levels of glycerol-3-phosphate (Gro3P), a key metabolite in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. The accumulation of Gro3P, following excess nutrients can cause metabolic stress, and increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to damage macromolecules, and cellular dysfunction (Prentki and Madiraju 2008; Prentki et al. 2020). The glycerol-3-phosphate phosphatase (G3PP) operates a glycerol shunt as it hydrolyzes glucose derived GroP to glycerol (Possik et al. 2022). In C. elegans, there are three homologs of the G3PP enzymes (PGPH-1,2,3) and they act in glycerol synthesis and protection from stress (Possik et al. 2022). Activation of PGPH-2, the major G3PP worm homolog, mimics some of the beneficial effects of caloric restriction (CR), particularly under glucotoxic conditions (Possik et al. 2023). In C. elegans, overexpression of PGPH-2/G3PP, under glucose excess, depletes glycogen stores to activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which leads to the nuclear translocation of HLH-30/TFEB, the induction of autophagy and increases lifespan under glucotoxicity (Possik et al. 2023). pgph-2 overexpression extends lifespan and healthspan independently of daf-16 and the insulin-like signaling pathway (Possik et al. 2023). Autophagy is induced in the intestine of pgph-2 overexpressing animals, but it is not clear if there is any selective autophagy involved. Thus, stress stimuli can elicit different responses that cooperate to promote optimal cellular repair and adaptation to stress. A diverse range of stressors modulate autophagy at different levels, transcriptional, posttranslational or at the cellular level. To understand whether general bulk autophagy or selective forms of autophagy are involved in every condition still will require future studies.
Autophagy in development
The first role for autophagy in the development of a multicellular organism was documented in dauer development (Meléndez et al. 2003). When young larvae are faced with a lack of nutrients, high temperature, or over-crowded conditions, animals arrest as dauers. However, insulin IGF-1/daf-2 signaling mutants when grown at the restrictive temperature form constitutive dauer. Employing daf-2/IIR or daf-7/TGF-β mutants and exposing them to the restrictive temperature where they would become dauers, was used to show that autophagy genes were required for the remodeling that occurs during dauer development (Meléndez et al. 2003). In this first screen for mutants that were required for dauer formation, RNAi depletion (by injection) of daf-2/IIR mutants showed that unc-51/ULK, bec-1/Becn1, atg-7/Atg7, lgg-1/Atg8, and atg-18/Wipi2 were required for dauer larvae formation (Meléndez et al. 2003). This was the first demonstration of a role for autophagy in the remodeling that is associated with dauer formation. During dauer development, GFP::LGG-1 expression was found to change from a diffused subcellular localization to increased GFP::LGG-1 positive punctate or foci (Meléndez et al. 2003). Similarly, GFP::LGG-2 presents a diffused localized expression that forms GFP::LGG-2 positive punctate foci during dauer development (Alberti et al. 2010). In a set of experiments to investigate in what tissues atg-18 is required for the increase in lipids that is associated with the dauer phenotype of daf-2/IIR mutants, transgenic expression of atg-18 in neurons rescued the phenotype of daf-2; atg-18 mutants (Jia et al. 2019). However, this experiment only examined the tissue specificity of atg-18 in fat metabolism of daf-2/IIR mutant dauer larvae. The tissues that require atg-18 in wild-type animals and in other developmental stages remain not known. Whether autophagy genes are required in all tissues or if they act non cell autonomously to promote the remodeling that occurs in dauer animals is not clear. It is also not known if autophagy gene activity is required for the behavior associated with dauer formation, such as nictation.
Autophagy in neurons
Neurons, like all cells, rely on autophagy to efficiently remove toxic materials, damaged organelles, and cellular debris. Several reviews of the role of autophagy specifically in neurons have recently been published (Stavoe and Holzbaur 2019; Hill and Colon-Ramos 2020; Fleming et al. 2022; Sidibe et al. 2022).
Compartmentalization of neurons
Neurons are polarized and postmitotic cells, and as such have no ability to dilute damaged constituents, such as damaged organelles or accumulated proteins, through cell division. Because of their function in the processing and transmission of information, neurons have high metabolic demands that, in some cases, are far removed from the cell body, in the axons, or dendrites. Thus, autophagy is particularly significant for neurons in the removal of aggregated or damaged proteins and organelles. Studies with fluorescent markers have established autophagosome biogenesis at the axonal tip and retrograde transport of autophagosomes to the cell body (Lee et al. 2011; Maday et al. 2012; Maday and Holzbaur 2014; Cheng et al. 2015). Interestingly, autophagosome formation in axons is independent from input from the cell body and can occur in severed axons (Hernandez et al. 2012; Soukup et al. 2016). Like in most cells, autophagy is induced under stress conditions but appears to be constitutively active at basal levels (Xilouri and Stefanis 2010; Lee 2012; Wong and Holzbaur 2015). These basal levels seem to be required for neuronal survival because the disruption of autophagic flux results in axon degeneration and neuronal cell death in mammals (Hara et al. 2006; Komatsu et al. 2007; Yue et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2013b).
Autophagy is important for many aspects of neuronal physiology, including neurotransmitter receptor turnover (Rowland et al. 2006), synaptic development (Shen and Ganetzky 2009; Stavoe et al. 2016), structural, and functional synaptic plasticity, which in turn is required for learning and memory (Nikoletopoulou et al. 2017; Glatigny et al. 2019), and synaptic pruning (Tang et al. 2014). Autophagosome biogenesis has been observed at synaptic sites in the distal axons of the interneuron AIY, which receive and process synaptic input from amphid sensory neurons and modulate behavioral plasticity as they respond to different sensory modalities, including gustatory, olfactory, and thermal information (Ishihara et al. 2002; de Bono and Maricq 2005; Chalasani et al. 2007; Satoh et al. 2014). In a screen for mutants that disrupted presynaptic development of AIY interneurons, an atg-9 mutation was recovered (Stavoe et al. 2016). Moreover, autophagosome biogenesis is spatially organized such that autophagosomes form in distal axonal compartments near the synapses (Fig. 6) (Stavoe et al. 2016). The autophagosomes undergo retrograde transport and fusion with late endosomes and lysosomes before degradation occurs in the cell body (Stavoe et al. 2016; Hill et al. 2019).
Fig. 6.
Autophagy in Neurons. Autophagosome biogenesis is compartmentalized in neurons. Autophagosomes are formed at axonal terminals near presynaptic compartments. Retrograde transport of autophagosomes occurs toward the cell body and this process is linked to the autophagosome acidification and maturation. Acidification requires fusion with proteolytic lysosomes or the fusion of endosomes (multivesicular bodies) with autophagosomes to form amphisomes. Autophagosomes rely on microtubules and associate with the minus-end-directed motors like dynein (in red) to move toward the cell body. This figure is inspired by figures from (Hill and Colon-Ramos 2020). For a more detailed description of proteins involved in the transport of autophagosomes, see Stavoe and Holzbaur (2019) and Hill and Colon-Ramos (2020)).
The fusion of autophagosomes with late endosomes and lysosomes appears to increase acidification, thus autophagosomes in the axons lack degradative capacity, until they have been transported to the soma (Fig. 6). Blocking the retrograde transport of autophagosomes blocks acidification and their capacity to degrade cargo (Fu et al. 2014; Wong and Holzbaur 2014). Mutants in several autophagy genes displayed defects in active zone assembly and synaptic vesicle clustering in early larval stages (Stavoe et al. 2016; Stavoe and Holzbaur 2019). Mutants in genes involved in selective forms of autophagy did not phenocopy mutants required for bulk autophagy mutants, suggesting that bulk autophagy rather than selective autophagy is required in axons (Stavoe et al. 2016; Stavoe and Holzbaur 2019). In addition, autophagy did not appear to be required for general neuronal development, although autophagy was found to control the rate of axon outgrowth but not dendritic patterning of the highly elaborate dendritic arbors of PVD somatosensory neurons (Stavoe et al. 2016; Stavoe and Holzbaur 2019). Thus, autophagy may regulate different stages of development in specific neurons, rather than serving a general function in all neurons (Stavoe et al. 2016; Stavoe and Holzbaur 2019). It should be noted that neurons in C. elegans are nonmyelinated and that autophagy may still function in mammalian myelinated neurons.
Presynaptic autophagy
The ATG-9 protein is transported from the neuronal cell body to presynaptic sites via the synaptic vesicle kinesin, UNC-104/KIF1A (Fig. 6) (Stavoe et al. 2016). In vivo and electron microscopic studies showed that ATG-9 localized to a subpopulation of vesicles at synapses, and colocalized with RAB-3 and SNG-1/synaptogyrin in vesicles that emerge from the Golgi apparatus via the AP-3 complex. Synaptic vesicle endocytosis of ATG-9 required unc-26/synaptojanin 1, unc-57/endophilin A, and dyn-1/dynamin activity (Stavoe et al. 2016). At presynaptic sites, ATG-9 rich vesicles undergo endo-exocytosis using the synaptic vesicle cycling machinery (Yang et al. 2022). This exocytosis is dependent on the endocytic genes unc-26/synaptojanin 1, unc-57/endophillin A and dyn-1/dynamin, since abnormal ATG-9 accumulation was observed in subsynaptic clathrin-rich foci (Yang et al. 2022). A mutation in unc-26/synaptojanin 1, a phosphatase that is associated with early onset of Parkinson's disease in humans, resulted in the accumulation of ATG-9 in presynaptic nerve terminals, defects in neurotransmission and locomotion. Similarly, loss-of-function alleles in autophagy genes that act in the early steps of autophagosome formation also affected the localization of ATG-9, resulting in its accumulation at presynaptic sites. Thus, ATG-9 exo-endocytosis mechanistically links the biogenesis of autophagosomes and the activity-dependent synaptic vesicle cycle (Yang et al. 2022). In a screen for mutations that disrupt ATG-9 sorting at synapses, the long isoform of the active zone protein Clarinet (CLA-1L) was found to be necessary for presynaptic sorting of ATG-9 and activity-dependent autophagosome formation (Xuan et al. 2023). Specifically, the ATG-9 protein, but not synaptic vesicle proteins, abnormally accumulate to subsynaptic regions enriched for clathrin in cla-1(L) mutants (Xuan et al. 2023). This mislocalization of ATG-9 is suppressed by mutants for synaptic vesicle exocytosis, suggesting that the ATG-9 phenotype in cla-1(L) mutants results from defects in ATG-9 sorting during exo-endocytosis. However, only activity-induced autophagy, and not basal autophagy is affected in cla-1(L) mutants, suggesting that other molecules are redundant with CLA-1(L) in supporting basal levels of autophagy. The clathrin adaptor complexes, AP-1, AP-2, and AP180, regulate ATG-9 sorting at presynaptic sites (Xuan et al. 2023), and via SDPN-1/syndapin-dependent vesicles. These results are consistent with findings in nonneuronal cells, where AP-1 and AP-2 complexes are required to traffic ATG-9 between the plasma membrane, the trans-Golgi network, recycling endosomes and the forming autophagosome (Guo et al. 2012; Puri et al. 2014; Imai et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2017). Interestingly, the sorting of ATG-9 at synapses is genetically separable from the sorting of synaptic vesicle proteins (Xuan et al. 2023). Both, ATG-9 and synaptic vesicles require the activity of the synaptic vesicle kinesin UNC-104/KIF-1A. A model has been proposed whereby CLA-1L bridges the exocytic active zone regions with the endocytic periactive zones to regulate presynaptic sorting of ATG-9 (Xuan et al. 2023).
In C. elegans, autophagy may selectively regulate the surface expression of GABAA receptors because (1) GABAA receptors colocalized with autophagosome markers, and (2) autophagy was found to reduce GABAA receptor surface expression in noninnervated muscle (Rowland et al. 2006). Autophagy may modulate neuronal excitation (Rowland et al. 2006). In neurons, the autophagy machinery is tightly coupled to neuronal activity, and autophagosome biogenesis occurs near presynaptic sites and in response to increased neuronal activity (Bunge 1973; Katsumata et al. 2010; Maday et al. 2012; Shehata et al. 2012; Soukup et al. 2016; Stavoe et al. 2016; Vijayan and Verstreken 2017; Hill and Colon-Ramos 2019; Kulkarni et al. 2021; Soykan et al. 2021).
Autophagy in axon growth
RPM-1 is an atypical RING E3 ubiquitin ligase in the PAM/Highwire/RPM-1 (PHR) protein family and functions to degrade UNC-51/ULK and generally restricts autophagy in the nervous system (Crawley et al. 2019). RPM-1 localizes to the growth cone of mechanosensory neurons, where it regulates axon termination (Schaefer et al. 2000; Grill et al. 2007; Borgen et al. 2017). For example, in rpm-1 mutants, the ALM and PLM mechanosensory neurons fail to terminate axon growth (Fig. 7) (Schaefer et al. 2000). In contrast, unc-51 mutants displayed a premature axon termination phenotype, and rpm-1; unc-51 double mutants showed complete suppression of the failed termination phenotype, indicating that RPM-1 functions upstream of UNC-51 (Crawley et al. 2019). Loss of rpm-1 activity resulted in the stabilization of UNC-51/ULK protein levels, indicating that RPM-1 spatially regulates the stability of UNC-51/ULK in axons, and broadly across the nervous system (Crawley et al. 2019). Therefore, RPM-1 may inhibit autophagosome formation in specific axonal compartments in C. elegans. In vertebrates, two other ubiquitin ligases, TRAF6 and KLHL20, regulate ULK1 also in nonneuronal cells, but it is not known whether they or RPM-1/Highwire act to regulate ULK in the vertebrate nervous system (Nazio et al. 2013). Finally, RPM-1 directly affected autophagy levels, as the defects in axon termination and synapse maintenance in rpm-1 loss-of-function mutants were dependent on multiple autophagy genes, including the bec-1/Becn1, epg-8/Atg14, atg-9, and epg-6/Wipi (Crawley et al. 2019). Work in cell culture and in mammalian neurons has also shown that extension of neuronal processes is regulated by autophagy, suggesting that these mechanisms are conserved (Ban et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2013).
Fig. 7.
The role of autophagy in longevity and cellular homeostasis. On the left, longevity pathways that include the Insulin IGF-1 Receptor signaling (IIS), inhibition of TOR, dietary restriction, germline-less mutants, and reduced mitochondrial respiration. All have been shown to induce autophagy and require autophagy for their improvement on healthspan and longevity. Although the mechanisms are not well understood, several positive regulators are known to induce autophagy: the forkhead transcription factors DAF-16/FOXO and PHA-4/FOXA, the energy sensor AMPK, the histone deacetylase SIRT-1, the HLH-30/TFEB, and the heat shock factor HSF-1 (see Table 2). Listed are also several pro-longevity treatments that have been found to require autophagy. On the right, examples of the role of autophagy genes or the autophagy process in other cellular and developmental programs, as discussed in this review.
Exophers in neurons
In C. elegans adult neurons inhibiting chaperone protein expression, proteasome activity, or the disruption of autophagy function, can trigger the production of large membrane-surrounded vesicles, which contain aggregates and organelles and are referred to as exophers (Melentijevic et al. 2017; Nicolas-Avila et al. 2022). Exophers were first discovered in C. elegans and have been characterized as giant extracellular vesicles, which may be as large as the neuronal somata from which they are extruded from (Melentijevic et al. 2017). Exopher production is increased by various cellular stressors, such as proteosome inhibition, disruption of autophagy, increased oxidation, increased osmotic strength, nutrient deprivation, expression of aggregating Huntingtin polyQ protein (HTT-Q128), or mCherry proteins (Melentijevic et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2021). Exophers selectively remove aggregated proteins and have been reported in mammalian systems (Davis et al. 2018; Choong et al. 2021; Nicolas-Avila et al. 2021, 2022). In C. elegans, it was noted that neurons that produced exophers under HTT-Q128 protein expression were better functioning, suggesting that exopher production serves a protective function (Melentijevic et al. 2017).
Exophers can be produced by the mechanosensory touch receptor neurons, and of the six touch neurons, the highest frequency of exophers is produced by the ALMR neuron (Melentijevic et al. 2017; Arnold et al. 2020; Cooper et al. 2021). Once exophers are released, they are engulfed by the surrounding hypodermis (Hyp7), and are broken up into smaller vesicles that are referred to as a “starry night” process (Melentijevic et al. 2017; Arnold et al. 2020, 2023; Wang et al. 2023). Dysruption of autophagy, proteosome activity, or chaperone protein expression, enhanced exopher production. A recent report found that the autophagy protein ATG-16.2 mediates the beneficial effects of inhibition of early-acting autophagy genes in neurons (Yang et al. 2024). They found that knockdown of early-acting autophagy genes increased exopher production, decreased neuronal PolyQ aggregates, and extended lifespan, independently of autophagic degradation. An exception of the early acting genes was atg-16.2, as atg-16.2 null animals did not show the exopher production increase or the phenotypes associated with knockdown of the early acting autophagy genes. Rescue experiments showed that the WD40 domain of ATG-16.2 mediates the beneficial effects of inhibiting early-acting autophagy genes in C. elegans neurons (Yang et al. 2024).
Vesicles in the hypodermis acquire phagosome maturation markers (2XFYVE/Hrs, a biosensor for PI3P, recycling early phagosome and endosomes RAB-10, and late phagosome and endosome RAB-7), before they are eventually degraded by hypodermal lysosomes (Wang et al. 2023). The hypodermis acts as an exopher phagocyte and requires hypodermal actin, Arp2/3, and the phagosome maturation factors SAND-1/Mon1, GTPase RAB-35, CNT-1 ARF-GAP, and the microtubule motor-associated GTPase ARL-8 (Wang et al. 2023). In addition, the GTPase ARF-6 and its effector SEC-10/exocyst activity were found to be required in the hypodermis, together with the CED-1 phagocytic receptor to generate exophers (Wang et al. 2023). A GFP::LGG-1 reporter colocalized with the “starry night” phagosomes, and degradation required CUP-5 activity, indicating that lysosome fusion is a late step in the process (Wang et al. 2023), even if lysosomal activity was not obviously required for exopher-phagosome resolution into smaller vesicles. Since the “starry night” vesicles acquired LGG-1/LC3, after fragmentation, the exopher phagosome fragments are thought to fuse with autophagosomes. Alternatively, exopher degradation requires a form of LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), similar to the case of neuronal pruning by phagocytic glia in vertebrates (Kim et al. 2017; Lieberman et al. 2019; Meng et al. 2022).
Autophagy in a model for amyotropic lateral sclerosis
Amyotropic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease characterized by the adult-onset of progressive neuromuscular denervation and motor neuron loss. Mutations in the fused in sarcoma (fus) gene account for 5% familial and 1% sporadic ALS cases (Lagier-Tourenne et al. 2010; Lagier-Tourenne and Cleveland 2010). Cytoplasmic FUS misexpression may also cause sporadic ALS (Tyzack et al. 2019) and cytoplasmic FUS aggregates have been observed in patients with frontotemporal dementia. To establish a model for ALS in C. elegans, mutations equivalent to the human disease-causing missense mutations in ALS patients (fust-1R524SC and fust-1P525LC) were generated in the C. elegans FUS gene fust-1 (Baskoylu et al. 2022). Mutant animals showed hypersensitivity to stress and impaired neuromuscular function (Baskoylu et al. 2022). Specifically, these animals displayed FUST-1 accumulation, defects in basal autophagy levels and SQST-1/p62 accumulation in motor neurons. Loss of the autophagy adaptor protein sqst-1/p62, suppressed the stress-induced locomotion and aldicarb sensitivity of the ALS/FUS mutant animals, but did not suppress the defects in basal autophagy defects (Baskoylu et al. 2022), suggesting that the autophagy defect, which leads to SQST-1/p62 accumulation is relevant for the severity of ALS. These findings suggest that stress, in addition to defective autophagy in ALS, fust-1 mutants, result in SQST-1/p62 accumulation to drive neuromuscular junction defects. How SQST-1/p62 accumulation perturbs neuronal function is not known, but these results suggest that the autophagy defects are upstream and not dependent on SQST-1/p62 in C. elegans. The loss of autophagy in conjunction with a functional selective autophagy receptor, such as SQST-1/p62, may exacerbate the disease by further challenging proteostasis (Baskoylu et al. 2022).
Autophagy in longevity
Several models of longevity have been described in C. elegans, including mutants in the daf-2 Insulin IGF-1-like receptor (IIR) or the class I PI3 K age-1 gene mutants (Kenyon et al. 1993), germline-less glp-1/Notch mutants (Hsin and Kenyon 1999), dietary-restricted animals (Raizen et al. 1995), reduced protein synthesis mutants (Hansen et al. 2007), and animals with reduced electron transport function (Feng et al. 2001; Dillin et al. 2002a; Lee et al. 2003) (see Fig. 7).
Autophagy was first demonstrated to be required for the longevity of insulin/IGF-1 daf-2/IIR mutants (Meléndez et al. 2003). In these initial experiments, RNAi depletion of bec-1/BECN1 significantly decreased the longevity of daf-2/IIR mutant animals, whereas it had almost no effect on wild-type animals. Since then, all longevity models have been found to increase the levels of autophagy, compared to wild-type animals, suggesting that increased autophagy is required for animals to show the lifespan extension (Meléndez et al. 2003; Hars et al. 2007; Toth et al. 2007; Hansen et al. 2008; Lapierre et al. 2011, 2013). More importantly, autophagy has been confirmed to be indispensable for all longevity models tested in C. elegans (Hars et al. 2007; Jia and Levine 2007; Tóth et al. 2008; Hansen et al. 2008; Tang et al. 2008; Alvers et al. 2009; Bjedov et al. 2010; Lapierre et al. 2011, 2012; Ruckenstuhl et al. 2014) (see Table 2 and Fig. 6). Evidence supporting a beneficial role for autophagy in prolonging lifespan has also been reported in other model organisms, including Drosophila, mouse, and yeast (Hansen et al. 2018; Kaushik et al. 2021).
Table 2.
Autophagy genes act in longevity pathways.
| Protein | Function/Step | Effect on Longevity |
|---|---|---|
| UNC-51 | Kinase/Induction | Mutations in the gene (all tissues and whole life) result in faster aging; required for longevity under conditions with mTOR suppression, overexpression of AMPK, rapamycin treatment, germline-less animals and dietary restriction (Tóth et al. 2008; Lapierre et al. 2011). |
| ATG-4 | Protease/Completion | Required for longevity of mir-34 loss-of-function mutants (Yang et al. 2013a). |
| BEC-1 | Part of the Class III PI3K/Nucleation | Mutations in the gene (all tissues and whole life) result in faster aging; required for longevity under conditions with mTOR suppression and longevity in germline-less animals (Hars et al. 2007; Jia and Levine 2007; Toth et al. 2007; Hansen et al. 2008; Meléndez et al. 2008; Eisenberg et al. 2009; Lapierre et al. 2011, 2013; Yang et al. 2013a; Ryu et al. 2016). |
| VPS-34 | Class III PI3K/PIK3C Nucleation | Required for longevity under dietary restriction, longevity in germline-less animals and after urolithin A treatment (Jia and Levine 2007; Hansen et al. 2008; Lapierre et al. 2011; Ryu et al. 2016). |
| ATG-7 | E1 enzyme/Completion | RNAi during adulthood decreases lifespan; required for longevity under spermidine treatment and dietary restriction (Hars et al. 2007; Jia et al. 2007; Eisenberg et al. 2009). |
| ATG-9 | Transmembrane protein/Phagophore Formation | Required for longevity of mir-34 loss-of-function mutants (Yang et al. 2013a). |
| LGG-3/ATG12 | Protein that forms a complex with ATG-5 and ATG-16.2/Completion | Required for longevity under insulin IGF-1 inhibition, or dietary restriction (Hars et al. 2007). |
| ATG-18 | PtdIns3P-binding protein/Formation | Required for longevity under insulin IGF-1 inhibition, mTOR suppression, and dietary restriction, lack of germline, reduced mitochondrial respiration, inhibition of S6K, or AMPK overexpression (Toth et al. 2007; Lapierre et al. 2011; Gelino et al. 2016; McQuary et al. 2016; Chang et al. 2017; Minnerly et al. 2017). |
| PINK-1 | Mitochondrial kinase/Mitophagy | Required for longevity under insulin IGF-1 inhibition, conditions after urolithin A treatment and NAM riboside treatment (Palikaras et al. 2015; Schiavi et al. 2015; Ryu et al. 2016). |
| SQST-1/p62 | Ubiquitin binding protein/Selective Autophagy Receptor | Required for longevity under conditions after urolithin A (Schiavi et al. 2015; Ryu et al. 2016; Kumsta et al. 2019). |
| HLH-30/TFEB | Transcription Factor/Induces autophagy | Required for longevity under conditions of mTOR inhibition, dietary restriction, inhibition of insulin IGF-1 signaling, inhibition of S6K, lack of germ line, reduced mitochondrial respiration; overexpression results in autophagy dependent increased lifespan (Lapierre et al. 2013; McQuary et al. 2016). |
Regulation of autophagy for longevity
Several transcription factors have been shown to promote autophagy at the level of gene expression in response to different environmental stressors, including DAF-16/FOXO (Lin et al. 1997), PHA-4/FOXA (Hansen et al. 2008), HLH-30/TFEB (Lapierre et al. 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013), SKN-1/Nrf2 (Tullet et al. 2008), HSF-1 (Kumsta et al. 2017), MML-1/MXL-2 or Mondo/Mlx (Nakamura et al. 2016), and nuclear hormone receptors, such as NHR-62, the HNF4-related hormone receptor (Heestand et al. 2013).
TFEB is a master transcription factor for the autophagy-lysosomal pathway (Settembre et al. 2008). Upon autophagy induction, TFEB shuttles from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, a process controlled by nutrient-responsive phosphorylation of TFEB (Puertollano et al. 2018). The C. elegans TFEB homolog HLH-30 also translocates into the nucleus upon starvation, and activates the expression of autophagy genes (Lapierre et al. 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013; Settembre et al. 2013a). Under nutrient-rich conditions, mTOR (in C. elegansLET-363/mTOR) phosphorylates HLH-30/TFEB at the lysosomal surface, promoting its cytosolic retention bound to 14-3-3 and thereby preventing its translocation to the nucleus (Peña-Llopis et al. 2011; Settembre et al. 2011, 2012; Martina et al. 2012; Roczniak-Ferguson et al. 2012). Inhibition of mTOR, e.g. by nutrient deprivation or by RNAi depletion, results in localization of HLH-30/TFEB to the nucleus to coordinate the expression of autophagy genes acting in all stages of the process (Lapierre et al. 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013). Similarly, nuclear translocation of HLH-30/TFEB is observed upon removal of the germ line, in animals with defects in daf-2/IIR signaling, reduced mRNA translation, or reduced mitochondrial respiration, and all these longevity programs require HLH-30/TFEB to extend lifespan (Lapierre et al. 2013). Moreover, overexpression of HLH-30/TFEB activates autophagy and moderately extends lifespan (Lapierre et al. 2013). TFEB-mediated transcriptional induction of autophagy may be important for promoting autophagic flux and providing a pool of metabolites, particularly lipids, to maintain homeostasis and prolong lifespan. The Myc superfamily basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor MML-1 (Myc and Mondo-like 1) and its heterodimer partner MXL-2 (MAX-like 2) were identified as modulators of the longevity conferred to germline-less animals (Nakamura et al. 2016). The Mondo family transcription factor MXL-3 protein (a paralog of MXL-1 (Max)), antagonizes the activity of HLH-30 to repress lipase genes in nutrient-rich conditions (O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013). MXL-1/MXL-2 belongs to the Myc and Mondo family and their homologs, MondoA/MLX or ChREBP/MXL function as a glucose sensor (Sans et al. 2006; Havula and Hietakangas 2012). The HIPK homeodomain-interacting protein kinase (HPK-1) also acts to induce autophagy in response to dietary restriction or inactivation of TORC1 (Samuelson et al. 2007; Das et al. 2017; Lazaro-Pena et al. 2023). HPK-1 requires the Myc-family of transcription factors to induce autophagy, preserve neuronal integrity, improve proteostasis, and extend lifespan. Thus, animals can cope with nutrient fluctuation by accurately sensing food availability and rapidly adjusting their metabolism.
There are several models of dietary restriction in C. elegans (Greer and Brunet 2009). eat-2 mutants have a mutation in an acetylcholine receptor that causes defective pharyngeal pumping, reduced food intake, and long-lived phenotype. eat-2 mutants display an increase in GFP::LGG-1 positive foci, and require autophagy genes (unc-51/ULK, bec-1/Becn1, vps-34, atg-18, and atg-7/Atg7) for the long-lived phenotype (Jia and Levine 2007; Hansen et al. 2008). Dietary-restricted animals require HLH-30/TFEB and PHA-4/FOXA for longevity (Hansen et al. 2008; Heestand et al. 2013; Lapierre et al. 2013). The longevity induced by dietary restriction can be partly mediated via TOR, since TOR inhibition of eat-2 mutants does not further extend lifespan (Hansen et al. 2008). The lifespan resulting from reduced TOR requires PHA-4/FOXA and HLH-30/TFEB activity (Sheaffer et al. 2008; Lapierre et al. 2013). It has been reported that in response to dietary restriction, the activities of HLH-30/TFEB and PHA-4/FOXA are coordinately regulated through an epigenetic mechanism that involves the activity of SAMS-1 and histone methylation (Lim et al. 2023). Dietary restriction represses SET-2, a histone H3K4 methyltransferase, and reduced the availability of S-adenosyl methionine and H3K4me3 levels, which in turn activate HLH-30/TFEB and PHA-4/FOXA (Lim et al. 2023). Germline-less mutants result from either ablation of the cells that will give rise to the germ line, or a mutation in glp-1/Notch (Hsin and Kenyon 1999; Wang et al. 2008). Germline-less mutants require HLH-30/TFEB, MML-1/MXL-2, and PHA-4 to induce autophagy (Lapierre et al. 2011, 2013; Nakamura et al. 2016).
Autophagy levels decline with age
There is considerable evidence for a decline in autophagic degradation with age in several model systems, which may result in the accumulation of dysfunctional organelles and damaged proteins that in turn contribute to cellular aging (Sarkis et al. 1988; Cuervo and Dice 2000; Del Roso et al. 2003; Sun et al. 2020). The construction of a complete single-cell gene expression atlas in C. elegans demonstrated that there are coordinated changes in cell-type-specific function, with the downregulation of energy metabolism (Roux et al. 2023). To monitor autophagy, flux assays have been carried out with a dual fluorescently tagged LGG-1 protein containing GFP and mCherry, as described above, section “Monitoring autophagy in C. elegans” (Chang et al. 2017). This dual fluorescent LGG-1, together with autophagy inhibitors, showed an age-dependent increase in the number of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in body wall muscle, intestine, pharyngeal muscle, and neurons. Similarly, autophagic flux was also reported to be diminished in whole body extracts of aged animals (Wilhelm et al. 2017). Collectively, these results suggest compromised autophagic activity with age (Chang et al. 2017). Of note, autophagy has also been consistently found to be dysfunctional in age-related disorders, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, or diabetes (Hara et al. 2006; Menzies et al. 2015; Levy et al. 2017; Zhao and Zhang 2019b; Debnath et al. 2023). Autophagy may act to recycle unnecessary or damaged macromolecules and organelles to provide raw material for new synthesis to rejuvenate a cell. However, what is being degraded, and in what tissues autophagy is required, are questions that are still far from being resolved.
Overexpression of autophagy genes in C. elegans does not result in a major effect on longevity, but has been reported to increase lifespan in other organisms, such as Drosophila, by promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system or in muscle (Simonsen et al. 2008; Ulgherait et al. 2014). The only exception is that overexpression of HLH-30/TFEB was shown to extend lifespan in an autophagy-dependent manner (Lapierre et al. 2013). Treatment of TFEB agonists have been shown to extend lifespan (Wang et al. 2017). Overexpression of the autophagy adaptor SQST-1/p62 was also found to promote proteostasis, induce autophagy and increase lifespan in C. elegans (Kumsta et al. 2019), but these results have been controversial, as several overexpressing SQST-1/p62 strains were found not to have an extended lifespan in a recent publication (Kumar et al. 2023). The reasons for this difference in the results are not clear. Suppression of Rubicon, a negative regulator of autophagy, was also found to promote longevity (Nakamura et al. 2019), and the expression of Rubicon increases with age, suggesting that this is one way in which autophagy may decrease during aging.
The MML-1/MXL-2 family of transcription factors was shown to be involved in longevity (Johnson et al. 2014; Nakamura et al. 2016). MML-1/MXL-2 belongs to the Myc and Mondo family member and is required for the longevity conferred by reduced TOR signaling, reduced Insulin IGF-1 signaling, and reduced mitochondrial respiration (Johnson et al. 2014; Nakamura et al. 2016). Inhibition of MML-1/MXL-2 was shown to impair HLH-30 nuclear localization and the activation of autophagy.
MondoA is a transcription factor that partners with Max-like protein X (Mxl) and its decline during aging was found to regulate cellular senescence, autophagy, and mitochondrial homeostasis (Yamamoto-Imoto et al. 2022). MondoA acts in a complex that promotes longevity in response to germ line removal or dietary restriction (Johnson et al. 2014; Nakamura et al. 2016). In addition, depletion of either mml-1 (homolog to MondaA/ChREBP) or mxl-2 (homolog to MLX) abrogated the induction of autophagy that normally occurs in glp-1/Notch germline-less mutants (Nakamura et al. 2016). Similarly, MML-1/MXL-2 is required for the longevity of animals with reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling, reduced TOR or reduced mitochondrial respiration. Transcriptome analysis found that MML-1/MXL-2 and HLH-30 have many shared target genes including lysosomal genes, but also have preferential targets, for example, atg-2/ATG2, atg-9/ATG9, and epg-9/ATG101 are preferentially regulated by MML-1/MXL-2, whereas unc-51/ULK and lgg-1/LC3 are regulated by HLH-30 (Nakamura et al. 2016). The spatial and temporal regulation of autophagy, the transcription factors required and how their regulation (time and place) of autophagy may vary under the different longevity models and needs to be further investigated.
Where is autophagy required for longevity?
Clearly, autophagy acts cell nonautonomously to improve the state of other tissues. To understand where autophagic degradation is required for longevity, spatiotemporal analysis of autophagy reporters was carried out using a tandem-tagged mCherry-GFP-Atg8 reporter, combined with inhibition by Bafilomycin to stop simultaneously flux and monitor the formation of autophagosomes and their degradation (Chang et al. 2017). These spatiotemporal studies of autophagic flux (the capacity to degrade by autophagosomes) in animals of various ages indicated that aging of wild-type animals was associated with an accumulation of stalled autophagic vesicles, and an age-dependent decrease in autophagic flux in many tissues, including the intestine, body-wall muscle, the pharynx, and nerve ring neurons (Chang et al. 2017, 2020). These studies further suggest a systemic, progressive decline in autophagic degradation capacity, referred to as autophagic flux (Chang et al. 2017).
The decline of autophagy may be systematically controlled with aging, where tissues cross-talk with each other to coordinate levels of autophagic degradation. To this effect, upregulation of a secreted microRNA, mir-83/mir-29, was found to act in the intestine of aging animals to impair autophagy via the inhibition of the mir-83 target CUP-5/MCOLN (Zhou et al. 2019). The mir-83-driven regulation was found to occur in the intestine and body wall muscle. However, no expression of mir-83 has been documented in body wall muscle (Martinez et al. 2008; Burke et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2019). This observation together with detection of mir-83 in purified exosomes, drove Zhou et al. (2019) to speculate that mir-83 is transported from the intestine into body wall muscle via exosomes in pseudocoelomic fluids.
Analysis of autophagic flux in long-lived daf-2/insulin IGF-1 signaling mutants and the glp-1/Notch receptor mutants, revealed that autophagy was differentially regulated, both spatially and temporally. Germline-less glp-1/Notch animals, but not daf-2/IIR mutants, require autophagy gene activity in the intestine for the lifespan extension (Chang et al. 2017). RNAi depletion of intestinal atg-18/Wipi2 had no significant decrease in the lifespan of daf-2/IIR mutants, despite the fact that daf-2/IIR mutants show an improved intestinal barrier function (Gelino et al. 2016). Therefore, in daf-2/IIR long-lived mutants, intestinal autophagy may not be required.
Intestine-specific expression of autophagy genes appears to be also required for the lifespan extension of dietary restriction in C. elegans (Gelino et al. 2016). Various reporters of autophagic activity and flux analyses indicate that autophagy is induced in the intestine of long-lived eat-2 mutants. Furthermore, intestine-specific RNAi of two LC3/GABARAP family homologs, lgg-1 and lgg-2 or of the WIPI homolog atg-18 significantly abrogated the extended lifespan of eat-2 mutant worms (Gelino et al. 2016). Thus, intestinal autophagy is required for the longevity mediated by dietary restriction. Collectively, these studies show that the spatial requirement for autophagy may be different in different models of longevity.
Selective forms of autophagy in longevity
Selective forms of autophagy have also been implicated in longevity, suggesting an additional level of specificity and regulation. Selective autophagy pathways include mitophagy (the degradation of mitochondria), lipophagy (the degradation of lipids), aggrephagy (the degradation of aggregates), and lysophagy (degradation of lysosomes). Regardless, in every case, autophagy is required for the observed extension of lifespan. It is difficult to separate the action of genes that function in the bulk autophagy pathway from those that act in selected forms of autophagy, and this is probably the most important question that needs to be investigated in the future for any potential requirement for autophagy.
Below are examples of selected forms of autophagy that have been shown to influence aging.
Aggrephagy
Age-dependent proteotoxicity can be modeled in C. elegans, for example Huntington's disease is caused by the presence of a polyglutamine (Poly Q) expansion in the protein huntingtin, which renders it prone to aggregation (Hsu et al. 2003; Morley and Morimoto 2004; Ben-Zvi et al. 2009). Aggregation of the Poly Q-containing proteins can be assayed and usually begins at the onset of adulthood (Hsu et al. 2003; Ben-Zvi et al. 2009). The proteostatic network declines with age, but this decline can be suppressed by the overexpression of HSF-1 (Morley et al. 2002; Hsu et al. 2003; Morley and Morimoto 2004), which increases longevity and improves stress resistance. In hormesis, the overexpression of HSF-1 results in a long lifespan, resistance to heat stress, and a decrease in several models of aggregation (Kumsta et al. 2017), see Hormesis below.
Lysophagy
Lysosomes can act as major signaling hubs and can sense and response to metabolic shifts in the cell, as they maintain cellular homeostasis (Settembre et al. 2013b). Maintenance of lysosomal integrity is important, and the lysosomal membrane contains heavily glycosylated membrane proteins that appear to form a continuous carbohydrate layer at the luminal leaflet to prevent the leakage of any acid hydrolases (Fukuda 1991; Saftig et al. 2010). The lysosomal glycoproteins include LAMP-1 (in C. elegansLMP-1), LAMP-2 (in C. elegansLMP-2), and the lysosomal integral membrane proteins LIMP-1/CD63 and LIMP-2. Loss of lysosomal integrity can trigger lysophagy (Raben et al. 2007), or the selective degradation of lysosomes. For a review of lysophagy, see Papadopoulos et al. (2020). The C. elegans protein SCAV-3, the ortholog of LIMP-2, was reported to act as a regulator of lysosome membrane integrity (Li et al. 2016). Loss of scav-3 resulted in ruptured lysosomes and a shortened lifespan (Li et al. 2016), phenotypes that can be suppressed by overexpression of LMP-1 or LMP-2, the C. elegans LAMPs, suggesting that longevity requires lysosomal integrity. In addition, a reduction in DAF-2/IIS suppressed the lysosomal damage and extended the lifespan of scav-3 mutants, in a DAF-16-dependent manner. Thus, lysosome integrity can be modified by the insulin IGF-1 signaling pathway to promote longevity (Li et al. 2016). Moreover, the inhibition of lysosomal damage observed in scav-3 mutants that also overexpress LMP-1 or LMP-2, did not require DAF-16/FOXO, suggesting that the effect of LMP-1 and LMP-2 was independent of DAF-16/FOXO. Interestingly, the appearance of GFP::Gal3 positive (reporter for damaged lysosomes) was unchanged in autophagy defective mutants that also carried the scav-3 mutation, when compared with scav-3 single mutants. Thus, the loss of SCAV-3 may affect the removal of lysosomes by autophagy or alternatively there are autophagy-independent mechanisms involved (Li et al. 2016).
Mitophagy
In C. elegans, mitophagy, the selected targeting of mitochondria for degradation by autophagy, cooperates with mitochondrial biogenesis to regulate mitochondrial content and longevity (Palikaras et al. 2015). DCT-1 (DAF-16/FOXO Controlled, germline Tumor affecting-1) (Palikaras et al. 2015) is an ortholog of the mammalian NIX/BIP3L and BNIP3 (Nip3-like protein X/Bcl-2 and adenovirus E1B interacting protein), a mitophagy receptor in mammals (Schweers et al. 2007; Sandoval et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2012), which acts together with PINK-1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase protein 1) and PDR-1/Parkin (a E3 ubiquitin ligase), as key mediators of mitophagy (Palikaras et al. 2018; Pickles et al. 2018; Ng et al. 2021). When damaged mitochondria causes membrane depolarization, impaired import of PINK1 results in its stabilization on the outer mitochondrial membrane, which recruits Parkin, which subsequently ubiquitylates proteins. The ubiquitin motifs are recognized by a set of autophagy receptor proteins that interacts with an LC3-interacting region (LIR) motif that connects to the IM, enabling the engulfment of mitochondria by the autophagosome (Palikaras et al. 2018; Pickles et al. 2018; Ng et al. 2021).
Mitophagy was induced in daf-2/IIR long-lived mutants, and compromising mitophagy by knockdown of dct-1, pink-1, and pdr-1/Parkin significantly shortened the lifespan of daf-2/IIR mutants (Palikaras et al. 2015). Similarly, dct-1 and pink-1 were also required for the longevity of mitochondrial mutants isp-1 or clk-1 and for the dietary-restricted eat-2 mutants (Palikaras et al. 2015). For these experiments, a mitochondria-targeted Rosella (mtRosella) biosensor, which combines a pH-insensitive DsRed fused to the pH-sensitive GFP, was employed. The GFP part of the biosensor is quenched in the acidic autolysosome, while the DsRed fluorophore is resistant. In transgenic animals with the mtRosella biosensor, stimulation of mitophagy was noted by the reduction in GFP/DsRed ratio (Palikaras et al. 2015). In parallel, transgenic animals expressing a mitochondria-targeted GFP and the DsRed::LGG-1 autophagosomal marker was used to detect mitophagy in body wall muscles (Palikaras et al. 2015). dct-1, pdr-1, and pink-1 mutants are more sensitive to stressors, such as ultraviolet radiation, paraquat treatment, or starvation, and DCT-1 overexpression was found to allow animals to better adapt to stress in a PINK-1 and PDR-1-dependent manner (Palikaras et al. 2015). In mitophagy gene-depleted animals, decreased ATP levels, accumulated ROS, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, increased oxygen consumption, and elevated cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels were found to be worse under stress conditions, all suggestive of mitochondrial dysfunction (Palikaras et al. 2015). Sustained intracellular Ca2+ signal triggers opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), mitochondrial depolarization, and activation of the Ca2+-dependent phosphatase calcineurin A, which dephosphorylates DRP-1 to drive mitochondrial fragmentation, a prerequisite for mitophagy (Augustine et al. 2003; Rizzuto et al. 2012; Brini et al. 2014; Bhosale et al. 2015; Giorgio et al. 2018). Localized elevation of Ca2+ activates mitophagy through the interplay of AMPK and calcineurin A in motor neurons (Zaninello et al. 2022). The chelation of Ca2+ or inhibition of calcineurin A protects GABAergic neurons from death and from mitochondrial dysfunction (Zaninello et al. 2022). Thus, Ca2+-sustained levels activate calcineurin A and AMPK to regulate mitochondrial dynamics and neuronal mitophagy (Zaninello et al. 2022).
SKN-1/NRF2 (nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor) was found to be a key player that couples mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy (Palikaras et al. 2015). SKN-1 is activated under oxidative stress (Ghose et al. 2013; Ploumi et al. 2017), and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis by upregulating the expression of several mitochondrial genes. SKN-1 was found to be required for the expression of dct-1 and daf-16 and its depletion disrupted DCT-1 mediated mitophagy, decreased mtDNA content, caused mitochondrial membrane depolarization, and increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ (Palikaras et al. 2015). Thus, biogenesis and turnover of mitochondria are coordinated to properly respond to energy demands, and stress.
In a screen for RNA-binding proteins that are altered upon aging, the RNA-binding protein PUF-8/PUM2, a translation repressor was found to regulate mitophagy (D'Amico et al. 2019). RNA-binding proteins have low-complexity domains that mediate their condensation in ribonucleoproteingranules and control mRNA translation, metabolism, and transport (Sheinberger and Shav-Tal 2017). In response to stress, RNA-binding proteins and their target mRNAs assemble in stress granules (Sheinberger and Shav-Tal 2017). The interaction of two mRNAs, puf-8 and mff-1 RNAs, was found to regulate mitophagy (D'Amico et al. 2019). The product of the mff-1 gene, the mitochondrial fission factor MFF-1, is an outer membrane mitochondrial protein that recruits the mitochondrial fission factor DRP-1 to mitochondria (Otera et al. 2010). In aged animals, the puf-8 mRNA regulates mitophagy by repressing the translation of the mff-1 mRNA, resulting in a decrease in mitochondrial fission and the accumulation of altered fragmented mitochondria (D'Amico et al. 2019). puf-8 knockdown in old C. elegans, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of its ortholog Pum2 in elderly mice, enhanced mitochondrial fission and mitophagy (D'Amico et al. 2019).
Frataxin (FRH-1) is a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial protein involved in the biogenesis of iron–sulfur (Fe–S)-cluster proteins and iron homeostasis. The human gene is involved in Friedreich's ataxia, a devastating and progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by impaired coordination and muscle weakness (Foury et al. 2007; Anzovino et al. 2014). Partial depletion of frh-1 increases autophagy and extends the lifespan of wild-type animals (Schiavi et al. 2015), although other reports have found it to shorten lifespan (Vázquez-Manrique et al. 2006; Zarse et al. 2007). The reasons for these conflicting results remain unknown, although it has been proposed that experimental differences regarding the application of RNAi (microinjection vs feeding) and different RNAi constructs could be the source of the conflict (Ventura et al. 2006). The depletion of FRH-1 protein expression has been found to be part of an iron starvation response that extends lifespan and increases mitophagy in a HIF-1-dependent manner (Schiavi et al. 2013, 2015). Similar to the pro-longevity effects of a partial depletion of frh-1, nontoxic levels of iron depletion with iron chelators, such as bypiridine, or the hypoxia mimetic CoCl2, extend lifespan through mitophagy (Schiavi et al. 2022, 2023). Exposure to nonlethal levels of hypoxia during development, referred to as hypoxia preconditioning, prevents the detrimental effects of severe hypoxia-induced neurodegeneration later in life (Dasgupta et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2021a). Thus, the antiaging effects of frh-1 depletion are proposed as a potential strategy to delay aging and slow age-associated neuromuscular pathologies (Schiavi et al. 2023). Gene expression analysis found changes in gene expression for genes that regulate mitochondrial activities, carbon and lipid metabolism, as well as genes involved in redox homeostasis in animals with partial depletion of frh-1 (Schiavi et al. 2023). As a beneficial role of glutathione-regulated pathways, loss of glutathione redox homeostasis impairs proteostasis by inhibiting autophagy in C. elegans neurodegenerative disease models (Guerrero-Gómez et al. 2019). Similar to mitochondrial stress (Dillin et al. 2002b; Rea et al. 2007), which has to be applied during development for its pro-longevity effects, the metabolic remodeling associated with mitochondrial hormesis and/or iron depletion must occur early in life to promote longevity (Schiavi et al. 2023). frh-1 RNAi depletion in C. elegans increases the pool of reduced glutathione and decreases iron ROS and lipid content, suggesting that frataxin depletion suppresses ferroptosis (Schiavi et al. 2013, 2015, 2023). Whether the reduction in iron availability conferred by iron chelators, and lipid remodeling impact ferroptosis through the same mechanisms, and if autophagy and ferroptosis cross talk to regulate health span and longevity under iron and/or FRH-1/frataxin depletion, are still questions that remain.
CISD-1, the nematode ortholog for mammalian mitoNEET and CISD2, is a mitochondrial iron–sulfur cluster binding protein that acts to maintain iron homeostasis and may provide a model to study the Wolfram neurodegenerative syndrome and related diseases (Hsiung et al. 2020; Ploumi et al. 2023). CISD-1 modulates longevity by engaging both autophagy and the mitochondrial intrinsic apoptosis pathway (Ploumi et al. 2023). Loss of proapoptotic CED-3, CED-4, and CED-13 or gain-of-function mutations in the antiapoptotic CED-9 were found to act downstream of CISD-1 to maintain neuronal integrity, mitochondrial bioenergetics, and promote lifespan (Ploumi et al. 2023). Intracellular levels of iron appeared to be important for CISD-1 function, as mild iron supplementation slowed down aging and improved the impaired mitochondrial energy production in animals lacking CISD-1 (Ploumi et al. 2023). In contrast, limiting iron availability at sublethal doses with an iron chelator, or through frh-1 silencing, protects against hypoxia, delays functional decline and extends lifespan through a hypoxia-like induction of mitophagy that protects against age-induced proteotoxicity (Schiavi et al. 2023). It has been proposed that the beneficial effects of silencing frh-1 are in part mediated by counteracting ferroptosis, mediated by iron-induced lipid (polyunsaturated fatty acids) peroxidation (Schiavi et al. 2023). As Schiavi et al. highlights, it may be difficult to figure out the oxygen levels or mitochondrial activity that trigger the beneficial effects of hormesis. However, interventions that mimic hypoxia or mitochondria preconditioning may be more feasible as preventive or therapeutic approaches to treat neuronal pathologies associated with aging decline (Schiavi et al. 2023). The beneficial effect of iron depleting agents is dose-dependent, and its associated metabolic remodeling must occur early in life to promote protection against aging and age-associated features (Maglioni et al. 2014).
Recent studies have found that a subset of SNARE proteins (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) localize to or in the vicinity of mitochondria, referred to as mitoSNARE factors (Gkikas et al. 2023). SNARE proteins are involved in the fusion of membranes including that of organelles and the plasma membranes, t-SNAREs for target membranes, and v-SNAREs for vesicle SNAREs (Yoon and Munson 2018; Sauvola and Littleton 2021). The mitoSNARE proteins include the t-SNARE syntaxin SYX-17, the v-SNAREs synaptobrevins VAMP-7 and SNB-6, as well as the tethering factor USO-1, which were found to regulate mitochondrial abundance and basal levels of autophagy (Gkikas et al. 2023). RNAi inhibition of the SNARE disassembly gene nsf-1 reduced mitochondrial mass and NSF-1 activity was required for the phenotypes associated with loss of mitoSNARE activity (Gkikas et al. 2023). Finally, the mitoSNAREs were found to be required in neuronal and nonneuronal tissues for normal aging (Gkikas et al. 2023). The detrimental effects of mitoSNARE gene depletion on aging suggest that these proteins play a role in basal autophagy regulation and aging.
Heteroplasmy of mitochondria DNA (mtDNA), the presence of more than one mitochondrial genome, is considered a hallmark of aging (Michikawa et al. 1999). Homogeneity of mtDNA occurs by the selective removal of deleterious mtDNA in the female germ line in Drosophila (Lieber et al. 2019). Homogeneity of mtDNA also occurs by the removal of paternal mitochondria after fertilization in C. elegans, Drosophila, and mouse (see section “Clearance of paternal mitochondria and Mos”) (Al Rawi et al. 2011; Sato and Sato 2011; Politi et al. 2014; Rojansky et al. 2016; Sato et al. 2018). These processes have been shown to require mitophagy. In C. elegans, the elimination of paternal mitochondria has been extensively studied, and a delay in clearance after fertilization leads to embryonic lethality (Zhou et al. 2016). However, the mechanisms involved for the role of mtDNA number variation in aging and associated diseases are not well understood.
Lipophagy
Recent studies in C. elegans have shown a connection between lipid metabolism and lifespan. Alterations in lipid metabolism have been associated with several long-lived mutants, as for example glp-1/Notch germline-less and daf-2/II mutants (Kimura et al. 1997; Ashrafi et al. 2003; Perez and Van Gilst 2008; Wang et al. 2008; O'Rourke et al. 2009). Lifespan extension in daf-2/IIR or germline-less glp-1/Notch mutants display an increase in GFP::LGG-1-positive foci in seam cells and require autophagy gene activity (Meléndez et al. 2003; Lapierre et al. 2011). glp-1/Notch mutants also require the lysosomal acid lipase LIPL-4 activity, which is specifically expressed in the intestine (Wang et al. 2008). LIPL-4 is upregulated upon fasting and is also upregulated in long-lived mutants with reduced insulin IGF-1 signaling (Wang et al. 2008; Mony et al. 2021). Autophagy-dependent lipolysis was found to promote longevity independent from LIPL-4 in glp-1/Notch mutants (Lapierre et al. 2011). Overexpression of LIPL-4 induces the nuclear translocation of the lipid chaperone lipid-binding protein 8 (LBP-8) and promotes longevity by activating the nuclear hormone receptor 49 (NHR-49) (Folick et al. 2015). More recently, peripheral lysosomal lipolysis resulting from constitutively expressing lipl-4 in the intestine was found to upregulate neuropeptide signaling in the nervous system that promotes longevity (Savini et al. 2022). This cell nonautonomous regulation is mediated by dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, and LBP-3, a lipid chaperone protein, which act though the NHR-49 nuclear receptor and NLP-11 neuropeptide in neurons to extend lifespan. Thus, lysosomes act as a signaling hub that coordinates metabolism and aging (Savini et al. 2022).
An important process that facilitates lipid transport between tissues is associated with longevity, and overexpression of the yolk lipoprotein vitellogenin reduced the lifespan of daf-2/IIR or glp-1/Notch mutant animals by impairing the induction of autophagy and lysosomal genes (Seah et al. 2016). In contrast, vit gene silencing enhanced the activity of PHA-4/FOXA and DAF-16/FOXO and induced the expression of autophagy and lysosomal acid lipase genes, resulting in an extended lifespan (Seah et al. 2016). vit gene silencing failed to extend the lifespan of daf-16/FOXO and hlh-30/TFEB mutants, indicating a role for these transcription factors in the longevity of vit gene silenced animals (Seah et al. 2016). The longevity of vit gene silenced animals also required the NHR-49 and NHR-80, thus, the regulation of yolk lipoprotein biogenesis can modulate aging by affecting the transcriptional activation of autophagy and lysosomal lipolytic genes (Seah et al. 2016).
Heat shock or pharmacological treatments that induce autophagy and prolong lifespan
Several treatments have been shown to prolong lifespan, including hormetic stress, and the treatment with spermidine, urolithin A, metformin, rapamycin, or nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NAD)+. Even if the exact mechanism of action for these treatments is not known, they have all been found to induce some form of autophagy. Again, the tissues, the mechanisms and the types of autophagy, bulk, or selective autophagy, are aspects that have yet to be elucidated (see Fig. 7).
Hormesis
Hormetic stress results from the exposure to an external stressor that is toxic at high doses, but beneficial at lower doses (Lithgow et al. 1995; Gems and Partridge 2008; Rattan 2008). This phenomenon has been found to work in several species, including C. elegans, Drosophila and human fibroblasts (Khazaeli et al. 1997; Le Bourg et al. 2000; Butov et al. 2001; Fonager et al. 2002; Hercus et al. 2003; Kristensen et al. 2003; Rattan and Ali 2007; Kumsta et al. 2017). A mild heat shock early in life has been shown to result in a beneficial treatment that promotes fitness, lifespan extension and a reduction in protein aggregation (Kumsta et al. 2017). Overexpression of the conserved transcription factor acting in the heat-shock response HSF-1 can induce a hormetic response, which improves proteostasis, increases longevity and improves stress resistance in C. elegans (Kumsta et al. 2017). Both heat shock and overexpression of HSF-1 induce autophagy in multiple tissues and autophagy genes were found to be essential for their stress resistance and longevity (Kumsta et al. 2017). Hormetic shock also increased proteostasis that improved several models of protein aggregation in an autophagy-dependent fashion (Kumsta et al. 2017). Thus, autophagy induction by hormetic heat stress enhances proteostasis and prolongs lifespan. Although autophagy genes are required, the mechanisms by which hormesis act to improve proteostasis, decrease aggregation or prolong lifespan are not clear. Hormesis can also be induced by a mild depletion of different mitochondrial electron transport chain regulatory subunits, mild hypoxia, mild iron depletion, and mild frataxin (FRH-1) depletion (see Mitophagy section) (Schiavi et al. 2013, 2015, 2023; Maglioni et al. 2014).
Spermidine treatment requires autophagy for longevity
The administration of spermidine, a natural polyamine, for which intracellular concentrations decline during human aging, results in an extension of lifespan in yeast, Drosophila, C. elegans, and human immune cells (Eisenberg et al. 2009; Hofer et al. 2024). Conversely, depletion of polyamines in yeast resulted in hyperacetylation, ROS generation, early necrotic cell death, and decreased lifespan. The alterations in chromatin acetylation status were shown to upregulate several autophagy genes, triggering autophagy in yeast, Drosophila, C. elegans, and human cells. Thus, a model where spermidine inhibits the activity of histone deacetylases, results in the induction of autophagy gene transcription that then in turn prolongs lifespan (Eisenberg et al. 2009). In a recent report, spermidine levels were reported to increase under fasting or caloric restriction in various species, including yeast, worms, flies, mice, and human volunteers, whereas disruption of the polyamine pathway abrogated the effects of fasting (Hofer et al. 2024). Mechanistically, spermidine is thought to mediate its effects by inducing autophagy and hypusination of the translation regulator eIF5A, in the context of fasting regimens (Hofer et al. 2024). Hypusine is an unconventional amino acid, formed by a unique posttranslational modification of a conserved lysine residue of eIF5A. Hypusination is required for the activity of eIF5A, the only known eukaryotic protein to contain hypusine (Park and Wolff 2018).
Urolithin A increase in lifespan is autophagy dependent
Urolithin A, the endproduct of both ellagitannins and ellagic acid, found in nuts, pomegranate, and berries, extends lifespan and improves fitness during aging (Ryu et al. 2016). Lifespan extension following urolithin A treatment was dependent on the expression of autophagy genes bec-1, sqst-1/p62, and vps-34, and the mitophagy genes pink-1, dct-1, and skn-1/Nrf2 (Ryu et al. 2016). Urolithin A treatment prevented the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria, and prolonged normal mobility and pharyngeal pumping, while maintaining respiratory capacity (Ryu et al. 2016). Both daf-16/FOXO and eat-2 mutants showed an extended lifespan with urolithin A treatment, while in contrast, life extension by urolithin A treatment was partially dependent on AMPK (Ryu et al. 2016). The effect of urolithin A was also dependent on mitochondrial function, as it was completely suppressed in mev-1 (mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit C, SDHC) mutants (Ryu et al. 2016). Mitochondrial function was not impaired in the urolithin A treated animals, as exposure to carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP-an uncoupling agent), induced respiration over basal levels. Urolithin A extended the lifespan of young or old animals exposed to either paraquat, an inducer of ROS, or an antioxidant N-acetylcysteine. These findings suggest that its longevity effects are independent of ROS levels (Ryu et al. 2016).
In a recent publication, urolithin A supplementation reversed memory impairment through PINK-1, PDR-1, and DCT-1, suggesting that mitophagy is involved (Fang et al. 2019). Mitophagy diminished the insoluble Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 and prevented cognitive impairment of an APP/PS1 mouse model through microglial phagocytosis of extracellular Aβ plaques (Fang et al. 2019). It also abolished AD-related tau hyperphorphorylation in human neuronal cells and reversed memory impairment in a model that expresses Tau in C. elegans or in mice.
Metformin treatment
The biguanide metformin, a drug that has been used for years as a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, promotes health, and extends lifespan in C. elegans (Onken and Driscoll 2010; Cabreiro et al. 2013; De Haes et al. 2014). The exact mode of action of metformin is not well understood. It is known to activate AMPK (Duca et al. 2015). Moreover, the transcription factor SKN-1/Nrf2, which regulates the transcription of antioxidants/cytoprotective genes, is required for the metformin-mediated increase in lifespan (Robida-Stubbs et al. 2012). Metformin has been found to extend lifespan in several model organisms (Bharath et al. 2020; Kulkarni et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2021). Restricted nuclear pore transit and upregulation of the ACAD10 were found to be required for metformin to extend lifespan (Wu et al. 2016). The expression of ACAD10 triggered by metformin requires SKN-1 activity (Wu et al. 2016), thus, it has been hypothesized that it limits MTORC1 activation by restraining the nucleo-cytosolic transport through the nuclear pore complex. It remains to be investigated whether the mode of action of metformin depends on the induction of bulk autophagy or some form of selective autophagy, such as mitophagy (Pietrocola and Kroemer 2017).
Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide
NAD+ is an essential metabolite that participates in energy metabolism and many reduction-oxidation reactions (Wilson et al. 2023). NAD serves as a substrate for a series of NAD+ consuming enzymes, NADases, which include polyADP-ribose polymerases (PARPs) and the sirtuin family of deacetylases (SIRTs). NADases can directly regulate autophagy and mitochondrial quality control (Fang et al. 2014, 2016; Fang and Bohr 2017).
Autophagy may also promote aging
More recently, there have been reports of examples of how autophagy can promote rather than inhibit senescent pathology. Sex-specific differences in autophagic function were found to influence longevity and to promote visceral aging (Ezcurra et al. 2018; Benedetto and Gems 2019). In this case, high levels of autophagy in the gut of hermaphrodites allows for production of more yolk and to maximize reproductive output. The DAF-2/IIR-driven and autophagy-mediated conversion of intestinal biomass into yolk eventually results in organ atrophy of the intestine and the accumulation of pseudocoelomic lipoprotein pools, as a form of senescent obesity (Ezcurra et al. 2018). In another example, global levels of autophagy were found to become dysfunctional with age and to be deleterious (Wilhelm et al. 2017). In these studies, post-reproductive inhibition of the VPS-34/BEC-1/EPG-8 autophagic nucleation complex in neurons, as well as its upstream regulators, strongly extended lifespan (Wilhelm et al. 2017). In contrast to previous studies that indicated positive roles of autophagy during aging, these data indicate that inhibition of early acting autophagy genes in aged worms results in improved neuronal integrity, and contributes to enhanced global health and increased longevity (Wilhelm et al. 2017). In these contexts, autophagy may be part of an example of antagonistic pleiotropy (Kirkwood 1977; Kirkwood and Austad 2000), where wild-type autophagy genes act beyond their “intended purpose” and are no longer under natural selection pressures.
Neuronal-specific RNAi depletion of early-acting autophagy genes extended lifespan, decreased polyQ aggregate number, and increased exopher biogenesis, an activity that requires ATG-16.2/ATG16L1 and its WD40 domain-related function (Yang et al. 2024). Neuronal exophers are large extracellular vesicles that are released from neurons to rid themselves of toxic protein aggregates (Melentijevic et al. 2017). A model has been proposed whereby inhibition of early acting autophagy genes promotes the formation of exophers, employing a noncanonical function of ATG-16.2/ATG16L1 WD40 domain that reduces neuronal protein aggregation and prolongs lifespan (Yang et al. 2024). Whether this ATG-16.2/ATG16L1 function represents a novel process of autophagy, is not known.
Autophagy was found to be detrimental for lifespan in conditions where mitochondrial membrane integrity is compromised, as in sgk-1 or rict-1 mutants (Zhou et al. 2021). Mutations in the serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase sgk-1 or of the TORC2 component, rictor (rict-1), were shown to result in a short lifespan (Soukas et al. 2009), but have increased autophagy. Moreover, inactivation of autophagy genes by RNAi in the intestine specifically, suppressed the short-lived phenotype of sgk-1 or rict-1 mutants to wild-type levels (Soukas et al. 2009). An unbiased mass spectrometry analysis identified a group of regulators in the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), including the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), as interacting with SGK-1 (Zhou et al. 2021). SGK-1 directly phosphorylates the VDAC and regulates its degradation via the proteasome. Overexpression of vdac-1 was reported to upregulate autophagy gene transcription and shorten lifespan, a phenotype that can be suppressed by the inhibition of autophagy (Zhou et al. 2021). This has led to the hypothesis that the transient or long-term opening of the mPTP is responsible for the short lifespan of sgk-1 and rict-1 mutants (Zhou et al. 2021). vdac-1 overexpression suppresses the long-lived phenotypes of dietary-restricted (eat-2 mutants), germline deficiency (glp-1/Notch mutants), or mitochondrial reduction (nuo-6 and frh-1 RNAi) (Zhou et al. 2021), in contrast to daf-2/IIR mutants which are still long lived despite vdac-1 overexpression (Zhou et al. 2021). Thus, although autophagy has been demonstrated in many instances to be required for longevity, there are several instances where autophagy can be detrimental.
Autophagy in stem cell homeostasis
In response to changes in the environment such as the availability of nutrients, and temperature, organisms delay development and/or reproductive capacity until favorable conditions resume (Hubbard and Schedl 2019). The C. elegans germ line is highly sensitive to food availability, and as such is a great model to investigate the role of autophagy in stem cell biology. In C. elegans, the reproductive organ consists of two U-shaped tubes that each contains approximately 1,000 germ cells, organized in a distal to proximal assembly line that contains the stem cell population in the distal end progenitor zone (Hubbard and Schedl 2019). As the cells move more proximally, they enter the meiotic program and will differentiate into sperm or oocytes. Each arm of the gonad has a cell population that proliferates during development, and which continues to divide after the animal reaches adulthood (Kimble and Crittenden 2005). For review, see Hubbard and Schedl (2019).
The decision of cells in the progenitor zone to proliferate is controlled by several signals that include the nutritional status of the animal and its age (Hubbard 2013; Hubbard and Schedl 2019). Several signaling pathways have been demonstrated to regulate the number of cells that account for the progenitor zone. These can affect either the cell cycle duration, or the decision of stem cells to proliferate vs differentiate (Hubbard and Schedl 2019). Germ cells have also been shown to be depleted with age, and the reproductive capacity of adult animals has been found to diminish with age (Luo and Murphy 2011; Pazdernik and Schedl 2013; Kocsisova et al. 2019; Tolkin and Hubbard 2021).
GLP-1/Notch signaling is required for the stem cell fate: in glp-1/Notch null mutant animals, germ cells begin to differentiate prematurely and enter meiosis in early larvae stages and spatially closer to the distal tip cell (Kimble and White 1981; Austin and Kimble 1987). In contrast, in glp-1 gain-of-function mutants, the germline cells continue to divide, and they fail to enter meiosis, resulting in an overproliferation or Tumorous phenotype (Berry et al. 1997; Pepper et al. 2003; Hansen et al. 2004). Robust expansion of the cells in the proliferative zone is regulated by nutrient sensing pathways, such as the DAF-2/insulin IGF-1-like signaling pathway, and DAF-7/TGFβ signaling pathway (Korta and Hubbard 2010; Michaelson et al. 2010; Dalfo et al. 2012; Roy et al. 2016; Pekar et al. 2017). Larval progenitor zone cell accumulation also requires the activity of TORC1 as LET-363/mTOR, DAF-15/RAPTOR, the downstream effectors IFE-1/eIF4E and RSKS-1 p70 S6K are all required. DAF-18/PTEN, AAK-1/2 AMPK, and DAF-12/NHR function to establish the germline quiescence in dauer animals (Fukuyama et al. 2006, 2012; Narbonne and Roy 2006; Colella et al. 2016; Kadekar and Roy 2019; Tenen and Greenwald 2019). These signaling pathways bring about a complex set of signals and tissue-specific interactions that are not well understood.
The activity of autophagy genes was reported to be required for the normal accumulation of cells in the progenitor zone (Ames et al. 2017). Animals that carry a loss-of-function mutation in bec-1/BECN1, atg-7/Atg7, or atg-18/Wipi2 genes, or RNAi knockdown (atg-9, epg-1, bec-1, vps-34, epg-8, atg-12, cup-5), were reported to display a reduction in the number of cells in the progenitor zone. bec-1/BECN1, atg-7/Atg7, or atg-18/Wipi2 autophagy genes were found to promote cell cycle progression, and thus autophagy genes appear to be required to promote cell cycle progression in the adult (Ames et al. 2017). Detailed analysis of bec-1/Becn1 mutants found that the number of germ cells replicating DNA or undergoing mitosis was decreased and that the cell cycle was delayed in an extension of the G2 phase (Ames et al. 2017). Intriguingly, BEC-1 was found to act in a nonautonomous manner to promote the cell cycle progression via the DAF-2 receptor (Ames et al. 2017). Similarly, atg-18 also appears to act noncell-autonomously (Kosinski K and Meléndez A, unpublished results). One possible requirement for autophagy is as a source of nucleotides for germ line proliferation. Interestingly, RNST-2, a C. elegans T2 family endoribonuclease, was found to mediate autophagic degradation of ribosomal RNA in lysosomes (Liu et al. 2018). A genetic screen for lysosome-defective mutants identified mutations in rnst-2, which display autophagy-dependent accumulation of rRNA and ribosomal proteins within enlarged lysosomes (Liu et al. 2018). rnst-2 loss-of-function mutants are defective in embryonic and larval development and are short-lived. Double mutants that combined the rnst-2 loss of function with mutations in genes involved in pyrimidine biosynthesis resulted in complete embryonic lethality (Liu et al. 2018). It would be interesting to learn whether the degradation of ribosomal RNA in lysosomes is required for germ cell development.
A recent report found that autophagic recycling of nuclear material is an important cellular process that preserves nuclear architecture, restricts nucleolar size, and promotes longevity (Papandreou et al. 2023). Knockdown of the nuclear envelope anchor protein ANC-1/Nesprin-2 shortened the lifespan of long-lived daf-2/IIR mutants, to a similar extent to that of bec-1/Becn1 depletion. Using a fibrillarin reporter strain FIB-1::GFP, anc-1/nesprin-2 mutants were found to result in enlarged nucleoli and increased endogenous FIB-1::GFP protein levels, a phenotype similar to that of bec-1 mutants (Papandreou et al. 2023). In contrast, daf-2 knockdown resulted in reduced nucleolar size and decreased FIB-1::GFP (Papandreou et al. 2023). This report uncovers a germline immortality assurance mechanism that involves nucleolar degradation at the most proximal oocyte. Whether this has any connection with the mitotic phenotypes observed in autophagy mutants is not known.
Autophagy in cell death
Autophagy has been implicated in promoting the clearance of apoptotic cells and in the process of cell death. It originally was thought to occur in apoptotic cells to promote the exposure of the phosphatidylserine, a step considered as part of the “eat me signal” that functions in signaling to the engulfing cell that will eventually degrade the apoptotic corpses (Qu et al. 2007). In C. elegans development, 131 somatic cells will die by programed, and this program is executed by a cascade of factors initiated by EGL-1, a BH3-only protein that binds to the antiapoptotic protein CED-9/BCL2, and activates CED-4/APAF-1 and CED-3 caspase activity (Hengartner and Horvitz 1994; Conradt 2009). Two evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways (e.g. one by CED-1, CED-6, and CED-7 and the other by CED-2, CED-5, and CED-12 in C. elegans) perceive a phosphatidylserine signal and activate a Rac GTPase (CED-10), leading to the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton for phagocytosis (Reddien et al. 2001; Reddien and Horvitz 2004; Elliott and Ravichandran 2010). In the germ line, cells in the meiotic pachytene stage will undergo programmed cell death to become nurse cells that provide cytoplasmic components to the maturing oocytes (Gumienny et al. 1999). The corpses are removed by somatic sheath cells and the corpse clearance process is mediated by CED-1 and CED-5 parallel pathways.
Autophagy activity is required for the removal of cell corpses (Li et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013; Jenzer et al. 2019; Peña-Ramos et al. 2022). Li et al. (2012) demonstrated a role for lgg-1, atg-18 and epg-5 in Q cell neuroblast corpse clearance in the L1 larval stage. Q neuroblasts at the left or right of the L1 larva generate two apoptotic cells (Q.aa and Q.pp) and three neurons by asymmetric cell division (Sulston and Horvitz 1977; Ou and Vale 2009; Ou et al. 2010). The neighboring hypodermal cell hyp7 engulfs and degrades the apoptotic Q cell. The autophagy proteins did not function in the initiation of apoptosis, but rather in the phagocyte to process the engulfed Q cell after their internalization and in phagosome maturation (Li et al. 2012).
In the germ line, Ruck et al. (2011) reported a role for vps-34, bec-1/Becn1, unc-51/Ulk1, or atg-18/Wipi in apoptotic germ cell corpse clearance. RNAi-depleted animals showed an increase in the number of apoptotic germ cell corpses, and the timing for cell clearance in bec-1/Becn1 RNAi-depleted animals was longer than that of wild-type animals. TEM of bec-1-depleted animals, showed a fully engulfed apoptotic germ cell corpse, suggesting that the increase in apoptotic germ cell corpses was due to a delay in the cell corpse degradation and not an increase in germ cell death (Ruck et al. 2011). In contrast, Wang et al. (2013) found that mutations in atg-3, lgg-1, atg-5, epg-1/Atg13, epg-4, and atg-2 did not affect the number of germ cell corpses, when compared with wild-type animals. The number of germ cell corpses was not increased in double-mutant combinations with the same autophagy genes and mutations in engulfment genes, such as ced-1, ced-5, or ced-12, as the double mutants were comparable to engulfment gene single mutants. In a third publication, atg-13(bp414), atg-9(bp564), atg-4.1(bp501), and atg-4.2(tm3948) mutants showed higher levels of germ cell apoptosis than wild-type animals under physiological conditions (Min et al. 2019). In the report by Wang et al. (2013), they found that autophagy genes promote germ cell death following genotoxic stress (after γ ray or ENU treatment). They also found that autophagic activity can act to cooperate with caspases in the death of ventral cord neurons, in mutants with partially compromised function in ced-3 (encoding the caspase) and ced-4/APAF-1 (Wang et al. 2013). It is not clear why some genes in the pathway may have an effect while other genes do not. The role of autophagy in cell death and cell corpse removal may vary depending on the developmental context, the cell type, and the stage of the animal. It may also be that the increase in germ cell apoptotic nuclei observed in some autophagy mutants results from a mechanism different from autophagy. This has to be further examined. Both LGG-2/LC3 and LGG-1/GABARAP were found to be involved in phagocytosis of apoptotic corpses in an LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) process during embryonic development of C. elegans (Jenzer et al. 2019). LGG-1 was found to act in apoptotic cells for the surface exposure of phosphatidylserine and LGG-2 was found to mediate the fusion between phagosome and lysosome to promote the degradation of apoptotic cells (Jenzer et al. 2019). More recently, Peña-Ramos et al. (2022) employed time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to show that canonical double-membrane autophagosomes are recruited to phagosomes to promote degradation of cell corpses by controlling the acidification of the phagosome in the embryo. Peña-Ramos describes a novel interaction between phagosomes and autophagosomes in the degradation of apoptotic cell corpses. In mammalian cells, lipidated LC3 molecules have been reported to label LAP vesicles, which are single-membrane vesicles (Sanjuan et al. 2007). LAP vesicles fuse to phagosomes and facilitate the degradation of apoptotic cells in mice (Martinez et al. 2011; Green et al. 2016) and require the function of autophagosome biogenesis genes, but not ULK1, ATG13, or ATG14. However, LGG-1 and LGG-2 define subpopulations of autophagosomes (LGG-1 positive only, LGG-2 positive only, and LGG-1 and LGG-2 positive) that all contribute to the degradation of apoptotic cell corpses. In the process of phagosome acidification, mCherry -LGG-1 and -LGG-2 reporters were found inside the phagosomal lumen, and this process required the autophagosome biogenesis genes atg-13 and epg-8/Atg14, genes that act in the canonical autophagy pathway and have not been found to be required for LAP (Peña-Ramos et al. 2022). In addition, ATG-9, the only membrane spanning autophagosomal protein was found to be present in phagosomal lumen, thus autophagosomes act in addition to lysosomes and endosomes in the acidification of phagosomes (Peña-Ramos et al. 2022). This report has worked to establish that in C. elegans, autophagosomes can fuse with the phagosome and are required as part of the maturation process of phagosomes (Peña-Ramos et al. 2022).
Studies have found that lysosomes go through a process of reformation from autolysosomes, referred to as autophagic lysosome reformation (ALR) (Gan et al. 2019). In C. elegans, lysosomal reformation occurs following phagolysosomal digestion of cell corpses in embryos, referred to as phagocytic lysosome reformation (PLR). SLC-36.1, the C. elegans ortholog of mammalian neutral amino acid transporters SLC36A1-4 (PAT1-4) is an essential regulator of PLR, and together with PPK3, the C. elegans PIKfyve ortholog, they are required for PLR (Gan et al. 2019). In the adult hypodermis, where no cell death occurs, SLC-36 and PPK-3 were found to also play a role in ALR (Gan et al. 2019).
Excessive autophagy has also been associated with necrotic cell death (Samara et al. 2008). Necrotic cell death can be suppressed by inactivation of autophagy genes or impairment of autophagy by pharmacological treatment (Samara et al. 2008). Necrosis in C. elegans is mostly defined by its physiological characteristics, which include plasma membrane whorls, cytoplasmic swelling, the formation of vacuoles, and nuclear membrane disintegration with a lack of chromatin condensation (Hall et al. 1997). The role of autophagy in necrosis was observed in the degeneration of touch cell neurons in animals that carry gain-of-function mutations in mec-4, mec-4d (Driscoll and Chalfie 1991; Toth et al. 2007; Samara and Tavernarakis 2008). Loss-of-function mutations in unc-51 or bec-1, or RNAi depletion of lgg-1 suppressed the necrotic-like degeneration. Excessive autophagy induced by the gain-of-function mutation in mec-4, mec-4d, supported the idea that excessive levels of autophagy play a role in cell death by necrosis (Toth et al. 2007; Samara et al. 2008). In a recent report on the death of mechanosensory OLQ neurons and uv1 neuroendocrine cells, which die in a pnc-1 mutant background as a result of excess nicotinamide (NAM) (Huang and Hanna-Rose 2006). PNC-1 encodes nicotinamidase and catalyzes the first step in the recycling of NAM to NAD+ (Huang and Hanna-Rose 2006; van der Horst et al. 2007). Even if the phenotypes of the dying cells by necrosis are similar, unc-51 and bec-1 were required for OLQ necrosis but had no role in uv1 necrosis (Reza et al. 2022). Thus, there are different types of necrosis. Why this is the case is not known.
Autophagy in innate immunity
C. elegans in their natural habitat are exposed to times of starvation and a wide variety of microbes that can be food, commensals, or pathogens (Schulenburg and Felix 2017; Zhang et al. 2017a). To defend against infection, C. elegans rely on innate immunity, rather than an adaptive immune system (Ermolaeva and Schumacher 2014; Kim and Ewbank 2018). Several recent studies have begun to elucidate the role of autophagy and proteostasis in response to pathogen infection (Kuo et al. 2018; Gallotta et al. 2020; Martineau et al. 2021). It is interesting to consider the connection of the signaling pathways that respond to nutrient deprivation, and those that act to control aging and how they also regulate the immune response. Disturbances that include starvation, damage of organelles, hypoxia, heat stress, and pathogen infection all impinge on the autophagic process, and autophagy as part of the proteostatic network, is important for the immune response.
Autophagy is required for resistance to Salmonella enterica
A first role for autophagy in the defense to infection in C. elegans was documented by exposing animals to the gram-negative bacterium Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium (Jia et al. 2009). S. enterica establishes a persistent infection in the lumen of the C. elegans intestine, thereby inflicting damage, and ultimately killing the host animal (Aballay et al. 2000, 2003). Mutations in daf-2/IIR, and in the class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase age-1, confer resistance to S. enterica infection (Garsin et al. 2003; Kurz and Tan 2004). Autophagy genes were required to inhibit the persistence of the pathogen and its replication in daf-2/IIR mutants (Jia et al. 2009). In animals that overexpress DAF-16/FOXO, it was noted that an increase in GFP::LGG-1 positive foci occurs in seam cells, a reporter for autophagosomes (Meléndez et al. 2003). In addition, the overexpression of DAF-16/FOXO required the activity of autophagy genes to provide pathogen resistance (Jia et al. 2009). RNAi depletion of bec-1/Becn1 or lgg-1/Atg8 resulted in the accumulation of intracellular bacteria and an expansion in the bacterial population in the intestinal lumen, demonstrating that autophagy genes are essential in host defense and mediate pathogen resistance (Jia et al. 2009). Intestinal-specific expression of the autophagy gene bec-1/Becn1 was found to be essential for host defense against Salmonella infection, demonstrating a cell autonomous requirement (Curt et al. 2014). This may be an example of xenophagy, a phenomenon first described in mammals (McEwan 2017), which involves recognition and ubiquitinylation events that mark intracellular pathogens for autophagosomal degradation (Andrade et al. 2006; Deretic 2006; Ling et al. 2006; Levine and Deretic 2007). However, this is not clear, as S. enterica does not appear to enter the cell (Kuo et al. 2018). Infection with pathogenic S. enterica was also shown to induce autophagy by inactivating the target of rapamycin (mTOR) (Ma et al. 2021). Although the mechanisms involving autophagy in limiting bacterial proliferation and reducing the load of bacteria in the lumen are not well understood, clearly autophagy is required for increased survival against Salmonella infection.
Autophagy in necrosis after Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection
Autophagy was found to play an important role in host defense after the infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Zou et al. 2014). Infection with P. aeruginosa (PA14) activates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway by upregulating the expression of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) ligand gene lin-3. The ERK pathway contributes to the activation of autophagy through its substrate CDC-48.2 (Zou et al. 2014). CDC-48.2 encodes a homolog of mammalian p97/VCP and yeast Cdc48, type II AAA ATPases. A significant increase in the GFP::LGG-1 reporter and lipidation of LGG-1 detected by Western blot were noted after infection with PA14 (Zou et al. 2014). Interestingly, heat-killed bacteria did not induce autophagy, suggesting that the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa activates autophagy. Systemic RNAi of mpk-1 significantly suppressed PA14-induced autophagy, whereas RNAi-mediated depletion of DAF-16/FOXO in the intestine had no effect on autophagy induction, even if it significantly enhanced susceptibility of PA14 infection (Zou et al. 2014). Mutations in the ERK pathway, such as let-60/ras, lin-45/raf, mec-2, or mpk-1 enhanced the sensitivity of animals to PA14 infection, and in contrast, the gain-of-function mutation in let-60 resulted in enhanced resistance to PA14 infection (Zou et al. 2014). Autophagy appeared to inhibit necrosis, and in turn, enhance the survival of infected animals. In these experiments, inhibition of autophagy did not influence the intestinal colony counts of P. aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus, suggesting that the primary protective role of autophagy was not to directly eliminate the pathogen, but to ameliorate necrosis by a not well-understood mechanism (Zou et al. 2014).
C. elegans infection by P. aeruginosa induces an iron-related mitophagy. Pyoverdine, a siderophore produced by P. aeruginosa, is required for pathogenesis in C. elegans (Kirienko et al. 2015). Siderophores are soluble extracellular molecules secreted by invasive microorganisms to bind and scavenge iron storage proteins from the host (Cassat and Skaar 2013; Kirienko et al. 2013). Pyoverdine binds iron, and provides iron to the pathogen, a key virulence factor (Meyer et al. 1996). Pyoverdine translocates to the host cell, binds, and extracts iron, as it damages the host mitochondria (Kang et al. 2018). Pyoverdine can kill C. elegans in the absence of bacterial pathogen (Kirienko et al. 2015). RNAi depletion of autophagy genes bec-1/Becn1, lgg-1 or the mitophagy regulators pink-1/PINK1 and pdr-1/PARKIN sensitized C. elegans to P. aeruginosa infection (Kirienko et al. 2015). Thus, mitophagy induced by iron chelation eliminates damaged mitochondria, to preserve energy homeostasis in this type of pathogen infection. It has been proposed that C. elegans surveils neuronal mitochondrial dynamics, to coordinate a systemic mitochondrial unfolded protein (UPRmt) response with mitochondrial connectivity, and to optimize survival under bacterial infection (Chen et al. 2021a). Activation of the mitochondrial UPR and mitochondrial fragmentation improved resistance to pathogenic P14 infection (Chen et al. 2021a).
In a recent publication, the CF18 strain of P. aeruginosa was found to cause a severe but reversible developmental delay that was shown to be caused by the induction of ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction (Mirza et al. 2023). In the response to infection, larvae upregulated mitophagy, antimicrobial, and detoxification genes, while the UPRmt response genes were repressed. The recovery and survival of mitophagy mutants pink-1, dct-1, and pdr-1/Parkin was significantly decreased, when compared with wild-type animals exposed to C18, suggesting that in this case mitophagy is also involved.
Infection by S. aureus regulates HLH-30/TFEB
Besides its role during nutritional stress, HLH-30/TFEB plays an important role in the immune response, for example in the response to the extracellular bacterium S. aureus (Visvikis et al. 2014). S. aureus infection of C. elegans by the oral route entails colonization of the intestinal lumen, intestinal epithelial cell destruction, and death to the animal within 48 h (Sifri et al. 2003; Irazoqui et al. 2010). HLH-30/TFEB is activated early during infection and controls the expression of the transcriptional immune response to infection (Visvikis et al. 2014). HLH-30 acts in a positive feedback loop during infection and orchestrates the regulation of components of several signaling pathways implicated in host defense, including JNK, p38MAPK, INS-18/INS, and TGF-β. HLH-30/TFEB also controls the expression of antimicrobial genes, such as autophagy genes, lysozymes, and C-type lectins, all necessary for host defense. RNAi-mediated depletion of lgg-1/Atg8, unc-51/Atg1, or vps-34/VPS34/pik3c3, resulted in impaired survival of S. aureus infection (Irazoqui et al. 2010). S. aureus infection induces the translocation of HLH-30/TFEB to the nucleus, similar to what has been shown in response to nutritional stress (Lapierre et al. 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013), and mutants lacking HLH-30/TFEB exhibit strong host defense defects. Mechanistically, HLH-30 drives most of the transcriptional host response, and both HLH-30/TFEB-regulated antibacterial and autophagy genes are required for host tolerance of infection (Visvikis et al. 2014).
The orphan nuclear receptor NHR-42 is an important negative regulator of host infection resistance, and functions at the intestinal epithelium, the site of infection by S. aureus (Goswamy et al. 2023). NHR-42 represses innate immunity and promotes lipid loss downstream of HLH-3/TFEB (Goswamy et al. 2023). Transcriptional profiles of nhr-42 mutants showed activation of an antimicrobial signature, of which abf-2, cnc2, and lec-11 appeared to be important for the enhanced survival of infection of nhr-42 mutants (Goswamy et al. 2023). Curiously, abf-2 is repressed by nhr-42 in the pharynx, whereas nhr-42 is expressed throughout the body (Goswamy et al. 2023). These results advance our understanding of the mechanisms by which the microphthalmia-TFE (MiT) family of transcription factors promote host defense and suggest that HLH-30/TFEB and TFE3 may similarly promote host defense via NHR-42-homologous nuclear receptors in mammals (Goswamy et al. 2023). Since autophagy requires membrane rearrangements and is involved in damaged organelle recycling, lipids may serve as a source of energy in host cytoprotection (Hou and Taubert 2012). In the absence of lipid mobilization, nhr-42 mutants might engage in autophagy to obtain energy for host defense from alternative sources (Hou and Taubert 2012).
HLH-30/TFEB integrates organismal stress, the response to starvation, and pathogen recognition as it coordinates host responses to all these different stresses (Lapierre et al. 2013; O'Rourke and Ruvkun 2013; Settembre et al. 2013a; Visvikis et al. 2014; Raben and Puertollano 2016). How HLH-30/TFEB integrates this information to produce specific responses to the different stresses and what factors may contribute to HLH-30/TFEB specificity are not known. We should note that the transcriptional response after S. aureus infection was distinct from the transcriptional response induced by nutritional deprivation, defining an infection-specific transcriptional signature (Wani et al. 2021). Thus, it will be important to understand how HLH-30/TFEB integrates the information to produce a specific response.
Nematocida parissii and Orsay virus infection induces autophagy
C. elegans can be infected by microsporidia, an intracellular pathogen that can infect a wide variety of animal hosts, including humans (Didier 2005; Williams 2009; Troemel 2011). N. parisii are natural intracellular parasites that were isolated from wild-caught animals (Hodgkin and Partridge 2008; Troemel et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2016). N. parisii employs an infection apparatus, which delivers the parasite directly into the host cell, where it replicates intracellularly. Autophagy and ubiquitination play a role in controlling N. parisii intestinal infection in C. elegans (Bakowski et al. 2014). Another natural intracellular pathogen of C. elegans is the Orsay virus, which was found originally in wild-isolates of C. elegans. The Orsay virus is a positive-strand RNA virus of the family Nodaviridae (Félix et al. 2011), and similar to N. parissii, it replicates inside C. elegans intestinal cells. Infection with N. parissi or with the Orsay virus upregulates the expression of genes involved in ubiquitylation (Bakowski et al. 2014). Transcriptional profiling of genes induced under infection with N. parissii identified several genes encoding components of the Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligases, including cul-6, skr-3, or skr-5 (Bakowski et al. 2014). A significant increase in pathogen load was observed in animals RNAi depleted for the components of the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase, suggesting that the E3 ligase components, together with ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, limit growth of N. parissii during infection (Bakowski et al. 2014). A similar induction of the SCF E3 ligase components was observed after transcriptional profiling during infection with Orsay virus. Restriction of N. parissii growth appeared to depend on both the proteasome and the autophagy pathway (Bakowski et al. 2014). During the parasite replication phase, LGG-1/Atg8 and ubiquitin co-localize to the N. parisii within the intestinal cells and RNAi depletion of lgg-1/Atg8 or sqst-1/p62 resulted in an increase in pathogen load. In addition, activation of autophagy by RNAi depletion of the nutrient sensor let-363/mTOR, increased the recognition driven by LGG-1/Atg8 targeting and resulted in a reduced pathogen load (Bakowski et al. 2014). Since the increase in pathogen load after RNAi of autophagy genes was relatively small, this result has been interpreted such that N. parissii may actively suppress autophagy (Kuo et al. 2018). Treatment with the DNA synthesis inhibitor fluorodeoxyruidine (FuDR) or the antimicrosporidia drug fumagillin resulted in an increase in the efficiency of ubiquitin targeting to parasite cells, suggesting that ubiquitination and autophagy both control intestinal infection with N. parissii, an example of xenophagy (Kuo et al. 2018).
Pore-formin-toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis
Another example for the role of autophagy in host defense is in the response to pore-forming-toxins (PFTs), which damage host cellular membranes (Verma et al. 2021). Upregulation of the hypoxia pathway was found to be required for animals to be resistant to PFTs (Bellier et al. 2009), thus low oxygen and the hypoxia pathway are important for the response to PFTs and the protection of cells that are directly attacked by the PFTs. A recent report found that the PFTs Cry5B and Cry21A are produced by the extracellular gram-positive bacterium B. thuringiensis and induce autophagy via HLH-30/TFEB (Chen et al. 2017a). In animals fed with Escherichia coli expressing the Cry5B toxin, an increase in autophagic vesicles was detected by electron microscopy and an increase in positive foci with the GFP::LGG-1 reporter was noted, which colocalized with labeled Cry5B proteins inside intestinal cells (Chen et al. 2017a). The induction of autophagy was cell autonomous and HLH-30/TFEB dependent. RNAi depletion of several autophagy genes, including bec-1/Becn1, atg-4.1, atg-4.2, lgg-1, lgg-2, lgg-3, and atg-18/Wipi2 all decreased the survival of infected animals with E. coli that expressed Cry5B. In addition, autophagy genes were required for the repair of membranes after Cry5B damage. Thus, PFTs elicits a cell autonomous induction of autophagy that controls the tolerance to PFT intoxication and xenophagic degradation of PFTs, as well as repair of the damaged membrane (Chen et al. 2017a). In this case, PFTs alone can elicit the response, and autophagy serves as an innate immune mechanism against bacterial infection.
Other processes that employ part of the autophagy machinery
A subset of the autophagy machinery proteins are required for LC3/ATG8 lipidation to single-membrane vesicles, a process known as conjugation of ATG8 to single membranes (Durgan et al. 2021), which function in pathways that include the LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), and the LC3-associated endocytosis (LANDO). Both LAP and LANDO rely on some of the members of the autophagy pathway to allow for efficient degradation of the cargo. LAP vesicles are single-membrane vesicles, instead of the double-membrane canonical autophagosomes (Sanjuan et al. 2007; Nakatogawa 2020). Both LAP and LANDO require the ultraviolet radiation resistance-associated gene protein (UVRAG) and Rubicon (Itakura et al. 2008; Heckmann et al. 2017; Heckmann and Green 2019; Pena-Martinez et al. 2022). UVRAG and Rubicon take the place of AMBRA1 and ATG14L in the autophagy VPS-34/PI3KC3 complex. AMBRA and ATG14L are both dispensable for LAP or LANDO activation, as is also the autophagy preinitiation complex containing FIP200/ULK1 in mammals (Heckmann et al. 2019; Heckmann and Green 2019). Although UVRAG and Rubicon orthologs have been identified in C. elegans based on protein sequence similarity (Table 1), no ortholog for Ambra has been identified in C. elegans. Another difference between autophagy and LAP is the requirement for reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in LAP (Heckmann et al. 2017; Heckmann and Green 2019; Boada-Romero et al. 2020). The cargo engulfed by autophagosomes is derived from intracellular sources, whereas LAP and LANDO cargo originate from the extracellular environment (Pena-Martinez et al. 2022).
Recent evidence has found that the clearance of the second polar body in C. elegans provides a strong model to study LAP (Fazeli et al. 2016, 2018). During meiosis, the oocyte expels the polar bodies to avoid lethal polyploidy (Fazeli et al. 2016, 2018). Polar bodies lose membrane integrity and expose phosphatidylserine. Polar body signaling recruits engulfment receptors to the plasma membrane of embryonic blastomeres using VPS-34/PI3K, the RAB-5 GTPase and the sorting nexin SNX-6 (Fazeli et al. 2018). LC3 lipidation is required for degradation of the corpse membrane after lysosome fusion. The polar body phagolysosome vesiculates in an mTOR- and ARL-8-dependent manner, which ensures its timely degradation (Fazeli et al. 2018).
Undifferentiated embryos degrade the midbody by LAP, a process independent of canonical autophagy (Fazeli et al. 2016). The midbody is released and phagocytosed before it undergoes phagosome degradation (Fazeli et al. 2016). This process requires the RAB-5 GTPase to localize the class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase VPS-34 complex at the cortex and the autophagy proteins BEC-1/BECN1, and LGG-1/2 are required, whereas UNC-51/ULK and EPG-8/ATG14 are not required for degradation (Fazeli et al. 2016). In polar body and midbody clearance, LGG-1/2 facilitates the lysosomal degradation of large, membrane-wrapped cargo. How LGG-1/2 is required to disrupt the inner membranes is not well understood.
In another process implicating autophagy proteins, the GABARAP ortholog LGG-1 controls the size of the nucleolus, which is a key hub for ribosomal assembly and an important lifespan determinant (Kumar et al. 2022). Silencing the conserved nuclear export receptor Exportin 1/XPO-1 led to marked reduction in global translation, together with a decrease in nucleolar size and lower levels of the nucleolar rRNA methyl transferase fibrillarin/FIB-1 (at the transcriptional and translational level) (Kumar et al. 2022). A connection with protein degradation and ribosome protein surveillance was established, as the ribosomal large subunit protein RPL-11 was found to be a target of LGG-1-mediated degradation.
Conclusion
Over the past few decades, great strides have been made on the characterization of the autophagy machinery and its roles in C. elegans development, maintaining cellular homeostasis, and longevity. These studies highlight the unique strengths of C. elegans as a model system, where genetic screens have allowed for the identification of previously unknown, conserved autophagy genes and to study their functions in animal physiology, metabolism, stress, and in longevity. C. elegans continues to provide an excellent tool for the discovery of novel genes and critical roles for autophagy genes in synapse formation, metabolism, cellular homeostasis, clearance of apoptotic corpses, clearance of toxic aggregate-prone proteins, innate immunity, and longevity. In addition, autophagy is often found to be disrupted in age-related disorders such as cancer, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases, and to be required for pro-longevity regimens. Research in C. elegans has clearly contributed to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes and the physiological roles of autophagy at the level of a whole organism, including nonautonomous effects and the communication between different tissues.
Since their initial discovery, many ATG proteins have been ascribed functions beyond that of autophagosome formation or ATG8-lipid conjugation. For example, BEC-1/Becn1, a component of the VPS-34 complex, regulates the nucleation step of autophagy (Kihara et al. 2001), but it has also been implicated in several nonautophagy functions, including endocytosis and retromer function in C. elegans (Ruck et al. 2011). Thus, future studies that examine the role of autophagy should rely on null mutations of more than one autophagy gene, preferably investigating genes with early and late functions in the pathway and employing inducible systems that can differentiate between canonical and noncanonical autophagy phenotypes.
The pleiotropic nature of autophagy genes requires the use of conditional knockout experiments, which can determine the spatial and temporal requirements for a gene in a specific context and how this context-dependent contribution of a gene affects a particular phenotype. Tissue-specific RNAi knockdown (Qadota et al. 2007; Zhuang and Hunter 2011; Zou et al. 2019) or recombinase-mediated conditional expression, such as employing Cre/lox, FLP/FRT, or Flexon experiments should be considered (Davis et al. 2008; Voutev and Hubbard 2008; Hubbard 2014; Muñoz-Jiménez et al. 2017; Shaffer and Greenwald 2022). Auxin-inducible degradation technology (Zhang et al. 2015b; Ashley et al. 2021; Negishi et al. 2022) will also be very helpful in the future as these can also allow for the high efficiency and rapid depletion of targets, as well as the reversibility of the system. Looking forward, it will be powerful to elucidate how the common components interface between the different canonical and noncanonical autophagic gene functions and how these affect development, cellular homeostasis and physiology.
C. elegans is an excellent model organism to study the cellular processes required for longevity and we expect that we will continue to build on the knowledge of the pathways involved, how they require autophagy for longevity, the tissues involved and the cellular processes that interface with autophagy. This will also help elucidate mechanisms of human disease. In the past few years, research in C. elegans has uncovered new layers of complexity for how genes function to protect a multicellular organism against stress, and control longevity. It may be difficult to differentiate between canonical autophagy and selective forms of autophagy because of the lack of effective methods to positively or negatively manipulate the selective processes without also affecting the canonical autophagy process. How different forms of selective autophagy cooperate to maintain cellular and organismal homeostasis, and the interplay between these pathways in pro-longevity regimens are interesting avenues of research to be investigated in the future. The advantage of the genetic tractability of C. elegans and its evolutionary conservation, will continue to elucidate the mechanisms involved and highlight the use of C. elegans as a model system.
Acknowledgments
We thank the C. elegans community including WormBase (Davis et al. 2022), WormAtlas (Altun et al. 2002–2024), the CGC [funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440)]. We apologize to colleagues whose work we failed to discuss because of space constraints or unintentional omission. We are grateful to Drs Hannes Bülow, Hui Zheng, Hui Zhang, our anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, and Dr Isabel Hanson for editing work.
Contributor Information
Hong Zhang, National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China; College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China.
Alicia Meléndez, Department of Biology, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, USA; Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology and Biochemistry Ph.D. Programs, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Funding
The work in Hong Zhang's laboratory was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82188101) and the New Cornerstone Science Foundation. The work in Alicia Meléndez’s laboratory was supported by a National Science Foundation/U.S. Israel Binational Science Foundation Award (2223241), National Institute of Health (NIH) grant no. 2R15GM102846-03, a U.S. Israel Binational Science Foundation Award (2017227), and National Institute of Health grant no. 1R21AG083302-01.
Literature cited
- Aballay A, Drenkard E, Hilbun LR, Ausubel FM. 2003. Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response triggered by Salmonella enterica requires intact LPS and is mediated by a MAPK signaling pathway. Curr Biol. 13(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01396-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aballay A, Yorgey P, Ausubel FM. 2000. Salmonella typhimurium proliferates and establishes a persistent infection in the intestine of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 10(23):1539–1542. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00830-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albert PS, Brown SJ, Riddle DL. 1981. Sensory control of dauer larva formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol. 198(3):435–451. doi: 10.1002/cne.901980305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alberti A, Michelet X, Djeddi A, Legouis R. 2010. The autophagosomal protein LGG-2 acts synergistically with LGG-1 in dauer formation and longevity in C. elegans. Autophagy. 6(5):622–633. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.5.12252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al Rawi S, Louvet-Vallée S, Djeddi A, Sachse M, Culetto E, Hajjar C, Boyd L, Legouis R, Galy V. 2011. Postfertilization autophagy of sperm organelles prevents paternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. Science. 334(6059):1144–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.1211878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altun ZF, Herndon LA, Wolkow CA, Crocker C, Lints R, Hall DH, editors. 2002–2024. WormAtlas. http://www.wormatlas.org.
- Alvers AL, Wood MS, Hu D, Kaywell AC, Dunn WA Jr, Aris JP. 2009. Autophagy is required for extension of yeast chronological life span by rapamycin. Autophagy. 5(6):847–849. doi: 10.4161/auto.8824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ames K, Da Cunha DS, Gonzalez B, Konta M, Lin F, Shechter G, Starikov L, Wong S, Bülow HE, Meléndez A. 2017. A non-cell-autonomous role of BEC-1/BECN1/beclin1 in coordinating cell-cycle progression and stem cell proliferation during germline development. Curr Biol. 27(6):905–913. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anding AL, Baehrecke EH. 2017. Cleaning house: selective autophagy of organelles. Dev Cell. 41(1):10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrade RM, Wessendarp M, Gubbels MJ, Striepen B, Subauste CS. 2006. CD40 induces macrophage anti-toxoplasma gondii activity by triggering autophagy-dependent fusion of pathogen-containing vacuoles and lysosomes. J Clin Invest. 116(9):2366–2377. doi: 10.1172/JCI28796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anzovino A, Lane DJ, Huang ML, Richardson DR. 2014. Fixing frataxin: ‘ironing out’ the metabolic defect in Friedreich's ataxia. Br J Pharmacol. 171(8):2174–2190. doi: 10.1111/bph.12470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold ML, Cooper J, Androwski R, Ardeshna S, Melentijevic I, Smart J, Guasp RJ, Nguyen KCQ, Bai G, Hall DH, et al. 2023. Intermediate filaments associate with aggresome-like structures in proteostressed C. elegans neurons and influence large vesicle extrusions as exophers. Nat Commun. 14(1):4450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39700-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold ML, Cooper J, Grant BD, Driscoll M. 2020. Quantitative approaches for scoring in vivo neuronal aggregate and organelle extrusion in large exopher vesicles in C. elegans. J Vis Exp. (163):10.3791/61368. doi: 10.3791/61368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashley GE, Duong T, Levenson MT, Martinez MAQ, Johnson LC, Hibshman JD, Saeger HN, Palmisano NJ, Doonan R, Martinez-Mendez R, et al. 2021. An expanded auxin-inducible degron toolkit for Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 217(3):iyab006. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashrafi K, Chang FY, Watts JL, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Ruvkun G. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans fat regulatory genes. Nature. 421(6920):268–272. doi: 10.1038/nature01279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Augustine GJ, Santamaria F, Tanaka K. 2003. Local calcium signaling in neurons. Neuron. 40(2):331–346. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00639-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Austin J, Kimble J. 1987. glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell. 51(4):589–599. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90128-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baba M, Takeshige K, Baba N, Ohsumi Y. 1994. Ultrastructural analysis of the autophagic process in yeast: detection of autophagosomes and their characterization. J Cell Biol. 124(6):903–913. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.6.903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakowski MA, Desjardins CA, Smelkinson MG, Dunbar TL, Lopez-Moyado IF, Rifkin SA, Cuomo CA, Troemel ER. 2014. Ubiquitin-mediated response to microsporidia and virus infection in C. elegans. PLoS Pathog. 10(6):e1004200. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ban B-K, Jun M-H, Ryu H-H, Jang D-J, Ahmad ST, Lee J-A. 2013. Autophagy negatively regulates early axon growth in cortical neurons. Mol Cell Biol. 33(19):3907–3919. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00627-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bas L, Papinski D, Licheva M, Torggler R, Rohringer S, Schuschnig M, Kraft C. 2018. Reconstitution reveals Ykt6 as the autophagosomal SNARE in autophagosome-vacuole fusion. J Cell Biol. 217(10):3656–3669. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201804028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baskoylu SN, Chapkis N, Unsal B, Lins J, Schuch K, Simon J, Hart AC. 2022. Disrupted autophagy and neuronal dysfunction in C. elegans knockin models of FUS amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Rep. 38(4):110195. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellier A, Chen CS, Kao CY, Cinar HN, Aroian RV. 2009. Hypoxia and the hypoxic response pathway protect against pore-forming toxins in C. elegans. PLoS Pathog. 5(12):e1000689. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Zvi A, Miller EA, Morimoto RI. 2009. Collapse of proteostasis represents an early molecular event in Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(35):14914–14919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902882106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedetto A, Gems D. 2019. Autophagy promotes visceral aging in wild-type C. elegans. Autophagy. 15(4):731–732. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1569919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry LW, Westlund B, Schedl T. 1997. Germ-line tumor formation caused by activation of glp-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans member of the Notch family of receptors. Development. 124(4):925–936. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.4.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bharath LP, Agrawal M, McCambridge G, Nicholas DA, Hasturk H, Liu J, Jiang K, Liu R, Guo Z, Deeney J, et al. 2020. Metformin enhances autophagy and normalizes mitochondrial function to alleviate aging-associated inflammation. Cell Metab. 32(1):44–55.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhosale G, Sharpe JA, Sundier SY, Duchen MR. 2015. Calcium signaling as a mediator of cell energy demand and a trigger to cell death. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1350(1):107–116. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bjedov I, Toivonen JM, Kerr F, Slack C, Jacobson J, Foley A, Partridge L. 2010. Mechanisms of life span extension by rapamycin in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Metab. 11(1):35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boada-Romero E, Martinez J, Heckmann BL, Green DR. 2020. The clearance of dead cells by efferocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 21(7):398–414. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0232-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borgen MA, Wang D, Grill B. 2017. RPM-1 regulates axon termination by affecting growth cone collapse and microtubule stability. Development. 144(24):4658–4672. doi: 10.1242/dev.154187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourdenx M, Gavathiotis E, Cuervo AM. 2021. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a gatekeeper of neuronal proteostasis. Autophagy. 17(8):2040–2042. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1935007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brini M, Cali T, Ottolini D, Carafoli E. 2014. Neuronal calcium signaling: function and dysfunction. Cell Mol Life Sci. 71(15):2787–2814. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1550-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bunge MB. 1973. Fine structure of nerve fibers and growth cones of isolated sympathetic neurons in culture. J Cell Biol. 56(3):713–735. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.3.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burke SL, Hammell M, Ambros V. 2015. Robust distal tip cell pathfinding in the face of temperature stress is ensured by two conserved microRNAS in Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 200(4):1201–1218. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.179184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butov A, Johnson T, Cypser J, Sannikov I, Volkov M, Sehl M, Yashin A. 2001. Hormesis and debilitation effects in stress experiments using the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans: the model of balance between cell damage and HSP levels. Exp Gerontol. 37(1):57–66. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabreiro F, Au C, Leung K-Y, Vergara-Irigaray N, Cochemé HM, Noori T, Weinkove D, Schuster E, Greene NDE, Gems D. 2013. Metformin retards aging in C. elegans by altering microbial folate and methionine metabolism. Cell. 153(1):228–239. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cassada RC, Russell RL. 1975. The dauerlarva, a post-embryonic developmental variant of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 46(2):326–342. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90109-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cassat JE, Skaar EP. 2013. Iron in infection and immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 13(5):509–519. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebollero E, van der Vaart A, Zhao M, Rieter E, Klionsky DJ, Helms JB, Reggiori F. 2012. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate clearance plays a key role in autophagosome completion. Curr Biol. 22(17):1545–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalasani SH, Chronis N, Tsunozaki M, Gray JM, Ramot D, Goodman MB, Bargmann CI. 2007. Dissecting a circuit for olfactory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 450(7166):63–70. doi: 10.1038/nature06292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang JT, Hansen M, Kumsta C. 2020. Assessing tissue-specific autophagy flux in adult Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol Biol. 2144:187–200. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0592-9_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang JT, Kumsta C, Hellman AB, Adams LM, Hansen M. 2017. Spatiotemporal regulation of autophagy during Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Elife. 6:e18459. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapin HC, Okada M, Merz AJ, Miler DL. 2015. Tissue-specific autophagy responses to aging and stress in C. elegans. Aging (Albany NY). 7(6):419–434. doi: 10.18632/aging.100765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H-D, Kao C-Y, Liu B-Y, Huang S-W, Kuo C-J, Ruan J-W, Lin Y-H, Huang C-R, Chen Y-H, Wang H-D, et al. 2017a. HLH-30/TFEB-mediated autophagy functions in a cell-autonomous manner for epithelium intrinsic cellular defense against bacterial pore-forming toxin in C. elegans. Autophagy. 13(2):371–385. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1256933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, Leboutet R, Largeau C, Zentout S, Lefebvre C, Delahodde A, Culetto E, Legouis R. 2021b. Autophagy facilitates mitochondrial rebuilding after acute heat stress via a DRP-1-dependent process. J Cell Biol. 220(4):e201909139. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201909139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L-T, Lin C-T, Lin L-Y, Hsu J-M, Wu Y-C, Pan C-L. 2021a. Neuronal mitochondrial dynamics coordinate systemic mitochondrial morphology and stress response to confer pathogen resistance in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 56(12):1770–1785.e1712. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, Scarcelli V, Legouis R. 2017b. Approaches for studying autophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cells. 6(3):27. doi: 10.3390/cells6030027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J-X, Sun Y-J, Wang P, Long D-X, Li W, Li L, Wu Y-J. 2013. Induction of autophagy by TOCP in differentiated human neuroblastoma cells lead to degradation of cytoskeletal components and inhibition of neurite outgrowth. Toxicology. 310:92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen D, Wang Z, Zhao YG, Zheng H, Zhao H, Liu N, Zhang H. 2020. Inositol polyphosphate multikinase inhibits liquid-liquid phase separation of TFEB to negatively regulate autophagy activity. Dev Cell. 55(5):588–602.e587. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng XT, Zhou B, Lin MY, Cai Q, Sheng ZH. 2015. Axonal autophagosomes recruit dynein for retrograde transport through fusion with late endosomes. J Cell Biol. 209(3):377–386. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201412046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choong C-J, Okuno T, Ikenaka K, Baba K, Hayakawa H, Koike M, Yokota M, Doi J, Kakuda K, Takeuchi T, et al. 2021. Alternative mitochondrial quality control mediated by extracellular release. Autophagy. 17(10):2962–2974. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1848130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colella E, Li S, Roy R. 2016. Developmental and cell cycle quiescence is mediated by the nuclear hormone receptor coregulator DIN-1S in the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva. GENETICS. 203(4):1763–1776. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.191858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conradt B. 2009. Genetic control of programmed cell death during animal development. Annu Rev Genet. 43(1):493–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JF, Guasp RJ, Arnold ML, Grant BD, Driscoll M. 2021. Stress increases in exopher-mediated neuronal extrusion require lipid biosynthesis, FGF, and EGF RAS/MAPK signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118(36):e2101410118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101410118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawley O, Opperman KJ, Desbois M, Adrados I, Borgen MA, Giles AC, Duckett DR, Grill B. 2019. Autophagy is inhibited by ubiquitin ligase activity in the nervous system. Nat Commun. 10(1):5017. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12804-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuervo AM, Dice JF. 2000. Age-related decline in chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem. 275(40):31505–31513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002102200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullup T, Kho AL, Dionisi-Vici C, Brandmeier B, Smith F, Urry Z, Simpson MA, Yau S, Bertini E, McClelland V, et al. 2013. Recessive mutations in EPG5 cause Vici syndrome, a multisystem disorder with defective autophagy. Nat Genet. 45(1):83–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.2497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curt A, Zhang J, Minnerly J, Jia K. 2014. Intestinal autophagy activity is essential for host defense against Salmonella typhimurium infection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Comp Immunol. 45(2):214–218. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalfó D, Michaelson D, Hubbard EJ. 2012. Sensory regulation of the C. elegans germline through TGF-beta-dependent signaling in the niche. Curr Biol. 22(8):712–719. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Amico D, Mottis A, Potenza F, Sorrentino V, Li H, Romani M, Lemos V, Schoonjans K, Zamboni N, Knott G, et al. 2019. The RNA-binding protein PUM2 impairs mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy during aging. Mol Cell. 73(4):775–787.e710. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das R, Melo JA, Thondamal M, Morton EA, Cornwell AB, Crick B, Kim JH, Swartz EW, Lamitina T, Douglas PM, et al. 2017. The homeodomain-interacting protein kinase HPK-1 preserves protein homeostasis and longevity through master regulatory control of the HSF-1 chaperone network and TORC1-restricted autophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 13(10):e1007038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dasgupta N, Patel AM, Scott BA, Crowder CM. 2007. Hypoxic preconditioning requires the apoptosis protein CED-4 in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 17(22):1954–1959. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis AA, Leyns CEG, Holtzman DM. 2018. Intercellular spread of protein aggregates in neurodegenerative disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 34(1):545–568. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis MW, Morton JJ, Carroll D, Jorgensen EM. 2008. Gene activation using FLP recombinase in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4(3):e1000028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis P, Zarowiecki M, Arnaboldi V, Becerra A, Cain S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Cho J, da Veiga Beltrame E, Diamantakis S, et al. 2022. WormBase in 2022-data, processes, and tools for analyzing Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 220:iyac1003. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Debnath J, Gammoh N, Ryan KM. 2023. Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 24(8):560–575. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00585-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Bono M, Maricq AV. 2005. Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci. 28(1):451–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeDuve C. 1963. The lysosome. Sci Am. 208(5):64–72. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0563-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeDuve C. 1964. From cytases to lysosomes. Fed Proc. 23:1045–1049. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Haes W, Frooninckx L, Van Assche R, Smolders A, Depuydt G, Billen J, Braeckman BP, Schoofs L, Temmerman L. 2014. Metformin promotes lifespan through mitohormesis via the peroxiredoxin PRDX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(24):E2501–E2509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321776111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Roso A, Vittorini S, Cavallini G, Donati A, Gori Z, Del Roso A. 2003. Ageing-related changes in the in vivo function of rat liver macroautophagy and proteolysis. Exp Gerontol. 38(5):519–527. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeRenzo C, Reese KJ, Seydoux G. 2003. Exclusion of germ plasm proteins from somatic lineages by cullin-dependent degradation. Nature. 424(6949):685–689. doi: 10.1038/nature01887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deretic V. 2006. Autophagy as an immune defense mechanism. Curr Opin Immunol. 18(4):375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deretic V, Levine B. 2018. Autophagy balances inflammation in innate immunity. Autophagy. 14(2):243–251. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1402992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Waal EJ, Vreeling-Sindelarova H, Schellens JP, Houtkooper JM, James J. 1986. Quantitative changes in the lysosomal vacuolar system of rat hepatocytes during short-term starvation. A morphometric analysis with special reference to macro- and microautophagy. Cell Tissue Res. 243(3):641–648. doi: 10.1007/BF00218073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Didier ES. 2005. Microsporidiosis: an emerging and opportunistic infection in humans and animals. Acta Trop. 94(1):61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dillin A, Crawford DK, Kenyon C. 2002a. Timing requirements for insulin/IGF-1 signaling in C. elegans. Science. 298(5594):830–834. doi: 10.1126/science.1074240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dillin A, Hsu A-L, Arantes-Oliveira N, Lehrer-Graiwer J, Hsin H, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Kenyon C. 2002b. Rates of behavior and aging specified by mitochondrial function during development. Science. 298(5602):2398–2401. doi: 10.1126/science.1077780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djeddi A, Al Rawi S, Deuve JL, Perrois C, Liu Y-Y, Russeau M, Sachse M, Galy V. 2015. Sperm-inherited organelle clearance in C. elegans relies on LC3-dependent autophagosome targeting to the pericentrosomal area. Development. 142(9):1705–1716. doi: 10.1242/dev.117879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dooley HC, Razi M, Polson HEJ, Girardin SE, Wilson MI, Tooze SA. 2014. WIPI2 links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting Atg12-5-16L1. Mol Cell. 55(2):238–252. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Driscoll M, Chalfie M. 1991. The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature. 349(6310):588–593. doi: 10.1038/349588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duca FA, Côté CD, Rasmussen BA, Zadeh-Tahmasebi M, Rutter GA, Filippi BM, Lam TKT. 2015. Metformin activates a duodenal Ampk-dependent pathway to lower hepatic glucose production in rats. Nat Med. 21(5):506–511. doi: 10.1038/nm.3787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durgan J, Lystad AH, Sloan K, Carlsson SR, Wilson MI, Marcassa E, Ulferts R, Webster J, Lopez-Clavijo AF, Wakelam MJ, et al. 2021. Non-canonical autophagy drives alternative ATG8 conjugation to phosphatidylserine. Mol Cell. 81(9):2031–2040.e2038. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg T, Knauer H, Schauer A, Büttner S, Ruckenstuhl C, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Ring J, Schroeder S, Magnes C, Antonacci L, et al. 2009. Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity. Nat Cell Biol. 11(11):1305–1314. doi: 10.1038/ncb1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elliott MR, Ravichandran KS. 2010. Clearance of apoptotic cells: implications in health and disease. J Cell Biol. 189(7):1059–1070. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201004096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ermolaeva MA, Schumacher B. 2014. Insights from the worm: the C. elegans model for innate immunity. Semin Immunol. 26(4):303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ezcurra M, Benedetto A, Sornda T, Gilliat AF, Au C, Zhang Q, van Schelt S, Petrache AL, Wang H, de la Guardia Y, et al. 2018. C. elegans eats its own intestine to make yolk leading to multiple senescent pathologies. Curr Biol. 28(16):2544–2556.e2545. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang EF, Bohr VA. 2017. NAD(+): the convergence of DNA repair and mitophagy. Autophagy. 13(2):442–443. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1257467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang EF, Hou Y, Palikaras K, Adriaanse BA, Kerr JS, Yang B, Lautrup S, Hasan-Olive MM, Caponio D, Dan X, et al. 2019. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-beta and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 22(3):401–412. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0332-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang EF, Kassahun H, Croteau DL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Marosi K, Lu H, Shamanna RA, Kalyanasundaram S, Bollineni RC, Wilson MA, et al. 2016. NAD(+) replenishment improves lifespan and healthspan in ataxia telangiectasia models via mitophagy and DNA repair. Cell Metab. 24(4):566–581. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang EF, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Brace LE, Kassahun H, SenGupta T, Nilsen H, Mitchell JR, Croteau DL, Bohr VA. 2014. Defective mitophagy in XPA via PARP-1 hyperactivation and NAD(+)/SIRT1 reduction. Cell. 157(4):882–896. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fazeli G, Stetter M, Lisack JN, Wehman AM. 2018. C. elegans blastomeres clear the corpse of the second polar body by LC3-associated phagocytosis. Cell Rep. 23(7):2070–2082. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fazeli G, Trinkwalder M, Irmisch L, Wehman AM. 2016. C. elegans midbodies are released, phagocytosed and undergo LC3-dependent degradation independent of macroautophagy. J Cell Sci. 129(20):3721–3731. doi: 10.1242/jcs.190223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Félix M-A, Ashe A, Piffaretti J, Wu G, Nuez I, Bélicard T, Jiang Y, Zhao G, Franz CJ, Goldstein LD, et al. 2011. Natural and experimental infection of Caenorhabditis nematodes by novel viruses related to nodaviruses. PLoS Biol. 9(1):e1000586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng J, Bussiere F, Hekimi S. 2001. Mitochondrial electron transport is a key determinant of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell. 1(5):633–644. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, He D, Yao Z, Klionsky DJ. 2014. The machinery of macroautophagy. Cell Res. 24(1):24–41. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenouille N, Nascimbeni A, Botti-Millet J, Dupont N, Morel E, Codogno P. 2017. To be or not to be cell autonomous? Autophagy says both. Essays Biochem. 61(6):649–661. doi: 10.1042/EBC20170025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleming A, Bourdenx M, Fujimaki M, Karabiyik C, Krause GJ, Lopez A, Martín-Segura A, Puri C, Scrivo A, Skidmore J, et al. 2022. The different autophagy degradation pathways and neurodegeneration. Neuron. 110(6):935–966. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folick A, Oakley HD, Yu Y, Armstrong EH, Kumari M, Sanor L, Moore DD, Ortlund EA, Zechner R, Wang MC. 2015. Aging. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 347(6217):83–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1258857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonager J, Beedholm R, Clark BF, Rattan SI. 2002. Mild stress-induced stimulation of heat-shock protein synthesis and improved functional ability of human fibroblasts undergoing aging in vitro. Exp Gerontol. 37(10–11):1223–1228. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00128-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foury F, Pastore A, Trincal M. 2007. Acidic residues of yeast frataxin have an essential role in Fe-S cluster assembly. EMBO Rep. 8(2):194–199. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu MM, Nirschl JJ, Holzbaur ELF. 2014. LC3 binding to the scaffolding protein JIP1 regulates processive dynein-driven transport of autophagosomes. Dev Cell. 29(5):577–590. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujioka Y, Alam JM, Noshiro D, Mouri K, Ando T, Okada Y, May AI, Knorr RL, Suzuki K, Ohsumi Y, et al. 2020. Phase separation organizes the site of autophagosome formation. Nature. 578(7794):301–305. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1977-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujioka Y, Suzuki SW, Yamamoto H, Kondo-Kakuta C, Kimura Y, Hirano H, Akada R, Inagaki F, Ohsumi Y, Noda NN. 2014. Structural basis of starvation-induced assembly of the autophagy initiation complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 21(6):513–521. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuda M. 1991. Lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. Structure, biosynthesis, and intracellular trafficking. J Biol Chem. 266(32):21327–21330. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54636-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuyama M, Rougvie AE, Rothman JH. 2006. C. elegans DAF-18/PTEN mediates nutrient-dependent arrest of cell cycle and growth in the germline. Curr Biol. 16(8):773–779. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuyama M, Sakuma K, Park R, Kasuga H, Nagaya R, Atsumi Y, Shimomura Y, Takahashi S, Kajiho H, Rougvie A, et al. 2012. C. elegans AMPKs promote survival and arrest germline development during nutrient stress. Biol Open. 1(10):929–936. doi: 10.1242/bio.2012836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallotta I, Sandhu A, Peters M, Haslbeck M, Jung R, Agilkaya S, Blersch JL, Rödelsperger C, Röseler W, Huang C, et al. 2020. Extracellular proteostasis prevents aggregation during pathogenic attack. Nature. 584(7821):410–414. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2461-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gan Q, Wang X, Zhang Q, Yin Q, Jian Y, Liu Y, Xuan N, Li J, Zhou J, Liu K, et al. 2019. The amino acid transporter SLC-36.1 cooperates with PtdIns3P 5-kinase to control phagocytic lysosome reformation. J Cell Biol. 218(8):2619–2637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201901074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garsin DA, Villanueva JM, Begun J, Kim DH, Sifri CD, Calderwood SB, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM. 2003. Long-lived C. elegans daf-2 mutants are resistant to bacterial pathogens. Science. 300(5627):1921. doi: 10.1126/science.1080147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatica D, Lahiri V, Klionsky DJ. 2018. Cargo recognition and degradation by selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 20(3):233–242. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0037-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gelino S, Chang JT, Kumsta C, She X, Davis A, Nguyen C, Panowski S, Hansen M. 2016. Intestinal autophagy improves healthspan and longevity in C. elegans during dietary restriction. PLoS Genet. 12(7):e1006135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gems D, Partridge L. 2008. Stress-response hormesis and aging: “that which does not kill us makes us stronger”. Cell Metab. 7(3):200–203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghose P, Park EC, Tabakin A, Salazar-Vasquez N, Rongo C. 2013. Anoxia-reoxygenation regulates mitochondrial dynamics through the hypoxia response pathway, SKN-1/Nrf, and stomatin-like protein STL-1/SLP-2. PLoS Genet. 9(12):e1004063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giorgio V, Guo L, Bassot C, Petronilli V, Bernardi P. 2018. Calcium and regulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition. Cell Calcium. 70:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gkikas I, Daskalaki I, Kounakis K, Tavernarakis N, Lionaki E. 2023. MitoSNARE assembly and disassembly factors regulate basal autophagy and aging in C. elegans. Int J Mol Sci. 24(4):4230. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glatigny M, Moriceau S, Rivagorda M, Ramos-Brossier M, Nascimbeni AC, Lante F, Shanley MR, Boudarene N, Rousseaud A, Friedman AK, et al. 2019. Autophagy is required for memory formation and reverses age-related memory decline. Curr Biol. 29(3):435–448.e438. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golden JW, Riddle DL. 1982. A pheromone influences larval development in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 218(4572):578–580. doi: 10.1126/science.6896933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gómez-Sánchez R, Rose J, Guimarães R, Mari M, Papinski D, Rieter E, Geerts WJ, Hardenberg R, Kraft C, Ungermann C, et al. 2018. Atg9 establishes Atg2-dependent contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum and phagophores. J Cell Biol. 217(8):2743–2763. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201710116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goswamy D, Gonzalez X, Labed SA, Irazoqui JE. 2023. C. elegans orphan nuclear receptor NHR-42 represses innate immunity and promotes lipid loss downstream of HLH-30/TFEB. Front Immunol. 14:1094145. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1094145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green DR, Oguin TH, Martinez J. 2016. The clearance of dying cells: table for two. Cell Death Differ. 23(6):915–926. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greer EL, Brunet A. 2009. Different dietary restriction regimens extend lifespan by both independent and overlapping genetic pathways in C. elegans. Aging Cell. 8(2):113–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00459.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grill B, Bienvenut WV, Brown HM, Ackley BD, Quadroni M, Jin Y. 2007. C. elegans RPM-1 regulates axon termination and synaptogenesis through the Rab GEF GLO-4 and the Rab GTPase GLO-1. Neuron. 55(4):587–601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero-Gómez D, Mora-Lorca JA, Sáenz-Narciso B, Naranjo-Galindo FJ, Muñoz-Lobato F, Parrado-Fernández C, Goikolea J, Cedazo-Minguez Á, Link CD, Neri C, et al. 2019. Loss of glutathione redox homeostasis impairs proteostasis by inhibiting autophagy-dependent protein degradation. Cell Death Differ. 26(9):1545–1565. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0270-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gumienny TL, Lambie E, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR, Hengartner MO. 1999. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development. 126(5):1011–1022. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.5.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Y, Chang C, Huang R, Liu B, Bao L, Liu W. 2012. AP1 is essential for generation of autophagosomes from the trans-Golgi network. J Cell Sci. 125:1706–1715. doi: 10.1242/jcs.093203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo B, Huang X, Zhang P, Qi L, Liang Q, Zhang X, Huang J, Fang B, Hou W, Han J, et al. 2014a. Genome-wide screen identifies signaling pathways that regulate autophagy during Caenorhabditis elegans development. EMBO Rep. 15(6):705–713. doi: 10.1002/embr.201338310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo B, Liang Q, Li L, Hu Z, Wu F, Zhang P, Ma Y, Zhao B, Kovács AL, Zhang Z, et al. 2014b. O-GlcNAc-modification of SNAP-29 regulates autophagosome maturation. Nat Cell Biol. 16(12):1215–1226. doi: 10.1038/ncb3066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall DH, Gu G, Garcia-Añoveros J, Gong G, Chalfie M, Driscoll M. 1997. Neuropathology of degenerative cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 17(3):1033–1045. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-03-01033.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hansen D, Albert Hubbard EJ, Schedl T. 2004. Multi-pathway control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Dev Biol. 268(2):342–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen M, Chandra A, Mitic LL, Onken B, Driscoll M, Kenyon C. 2008. A role for autophagy in the extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4(2):e24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen M, Rubinsztein DC, Walker DW. 2018. Autophagy as a promoter of longevity: insights from model organisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19(9):579–593. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0033-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen M, Taubert S, Crawford D, Libina N, Lee S, Kenyon C. 2007. Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 6(1):95–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, Suzuki-Migishima R, Yokoyama M, Mishima K, Saito I, Okano H, et al. 2006. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature. 441(7095):885–889. doi: 10.1038/nature04724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harding TM, Hefner-Gravink A, Thumm M, Klionsky DJ. 1996. Genetic and phenotypic overlap between autophagy and the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway. J Biol Chem. 271(30):17621–17624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.30.17621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harding TM, Morano KA, Scott SV, Klionsky DJ. 1995. Isolation and characterization of yeast mutants in the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway. J Cell Biol. 131(3):591–602. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hars ES, Qi H, Jin SV, Cai L, Hu C, Liu LF. 2007. Autophagy regulates ageing in C. elegans. Autophagy. 3(2):93–95. doi: 10.4161/auto.3636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havula E, Hietakangas V. 2012. Glucose sensing by ChREBP/MondoA-Mlx transcription factors. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 23(6):640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi-Nishino M, Fujita N, Noda T, Yamaguchi A, Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A. 2009. A subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum forms a cradle for autophagosome formation. Nat Cell Biol. 11(12):1433–1437. doi: 10.1038/ncb1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heckmann BL, Boada-Romero E, Cunha LD, Magne J, Green DR. 2017. LC3-associated phagocytosis and inflammation. J Mol Biol. 429(23):3561–3576. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heckmann BL, Green DR. 2019. LC3-associated phagocytosis at a glance. J Cell Sci. 132:jcs222984. doi: 10.1242/jcs.222984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heckmann BL, Teubner BJW, Tummers B, Boada-Romero E, Harris L, Yang M, Guy CS, Zakharenko SS, Green DR. 2019. LC3-associated endocytosis facilitates beta-amyloid clearance and mitigates neurodegeneration in murine Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 178(3):536–551.e514. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heestand BN, Shen Y, Liu W, Magner DB, Storm N, Meharg C, Habermann B, Antebi A. 2013. Dietary restriction induced longevity is mediated by nuclear receptor NHR-62 in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 9(7):e1003651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hengartner MO, Horvitz HR. 1994. Activation of C. elegans cell death protein CED-9 by an amino-acid substitution in a domain conserved in Bcl-2. Nature. 369(6478):318–320. doi: 10.1038/369318a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hercus MJ, Loeschcke V, Rattan SI. 2003. Lifespan extension of Drosophila melanogaster through hormesis by repeated mild heat stress. Biogerontology. 4(3):149–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1024197806855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez D, Torres CA, Setlik W, Cebrián C, Mosharov EV, Tang G, Cheng H-C, Kholodilov N, Yarygina O, Burke RE, et al. 2012. Regulation of presynaptic neurotransmission by macroautophagy. Neuron. 74(2):277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill SE, Colon-Ramos DA. 2019. A specific ATG-4 isoform is required for autophagic maturation and clearance in C. elegans neurons. Autophagy. 15(10):1840–1842. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1632123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill SE, Colon-Ramos DA. 2020. The journey of the synaptic autophagosome: a cell biological perspective. Neuron. 105(6):961–973. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill SE, Kauffman KJ, Krout M, Richmond JE, Melia TJ, Colón-Ramos DA. 2019. Maturation and clearance of autophagosomes in neurons depends on a specific cysteine protease isoform, ATG-4.2. Dev Cell. 49(2):251–266.e258. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hird SN, Paulsen JE, Strome S. 1996. Segregation of germ granules in living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos: cell-type-specific mechanisms for cytoplasmic localisation. Development. 122(4):1303–1312. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.4.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgkin J, Partridge FA. 2008. Caenorhabditis elegans meets microsporidia: the nematode killers from Paris. PLoS Biol. 6(12):2634–2637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofer SJ, Daskalaki I, Bergmann M, Friščić J, Zimmermann A, Mueller MI, Abdellatif M, Nicastro R, Masser S, Durand S, et al. 2024. Spermidine is essential for fasting-mediated autophagy and longevity. Nat Cell Biol. 26(9):1571–1584. doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01468-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollenstein DM, Gómez-Sánchez R, Ciftci A, Kriegenburg F, Mari M, Torggler R, Licheva M, Reggiori F, Kraft C. 2019. Vac8 spatially confines autophagosome formation at the vacuole in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 132(22):jcs235002. doi: 10.1242/jcs.235002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou NS, Taubert S. 2012. Function and regulation of lipid biology in Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Front Physiol. 3:143. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsin H, Kenyon C. 1999. Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans. Nature. 399(6734):362–366. doi: 10.1038/20694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsiung K-C, Liu K-Y, Tsai T-F, Yoshina S, Mitani S, Chin-Ming Tan B, Lo SJ. 2020. Defects in CISD-1, a mitochondrial iron-sulfur protein, lower glucose level and ATP production in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biomed J. 43(1):32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2019.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu AL, Murphy CT, Kenyon C. 2003. Regulation of aging and age-related disease by DAF-16 and heat-shock factor. Science. 300(5622):1142–1145. doi: 10.1126/science.1083701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang L, Hanna-Rose W. 2006. EGF signaling overcomes a uterine cell death associated with temporal mis-coordination of organogenesis within the C. elegans egg-laying apparatus. Dev Biol. 300(2):599–611. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S, Jia K, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Levine B. 2013. Autophagy genes function in apoptotic cell corpse clearance during C. elegans embryonic development. Autophagy. 9(2):138–149. doi: 10.4161/auto.22352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbard EJ. 2013. Diet and genetics: Trp-ing over food sensitivity. Curr Biol. 23(8):R326–R327. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbard EJ. 2014. FLP/FRT and Cre/lox recombination technology in C. elegans. Methods. 68(3):417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbard EJA, Schedl T. 2019. Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cell system. GENETICS. 213(4):1145–1188. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.300238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imai K, Hao F, Fujita N, Tsuji Y, Oe Y, Araki Y, Hamasaki M, Noda T, Yoshimori T. 2016. Atg9A trafficking through the recycling endosomes is required for autophagosome formation. J Cell Sci. 129(20):3781–3791. doi: 10.1242/jcs.196196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irazoqui JE, Troemel ER, Feinbaum RL, Luhachack LG, Cezairliyan BO, Ausubel FM. 2010. Distinct pathogenesis and host responses during infection of C. elegans by P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. PLoS Pathog. 6(7):e1000982. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishihara T, Iino Y, Mohri A, Mori I, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Katsura I. 2002. HEN-1, a secretory protein with an LDL receptor motif, regulates sensory integration and learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. 109(5):639–649. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00748-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Itakura E, Kishi C, Inoue K, Mizushima N. 2008. Beclin 1 forms two distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes with mammalian Atg14 and UVRAG. Mol Biol Cell. 19(12):5360–5372. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-01-0080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Itakura E, Mizushima N. 2010. Characterization of autophagosome formation site by a hierarchical analysis of mammalian Atg proteins. Autophagy. 6(6):764–776. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.6.12709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jahn R, Scheller RH. 2006. SNAREs–engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 7(9):631–643. doi: 10.1038/nrm2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenzer C, Simionato E, Largeau C, Scarcelli V, Lefebvre C, Legouis R. 2019. Autophagy mediates phosphatidylserine exposure and phagosome degradation during apoptosis through specific functions of GABARAP/LGG-1 and LC3/LGG-2. Autophagy. 15(2):228–241. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1512452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenzer C, Simionato E, Legouis R. 2015. Tools and methods to analyze autophagy in C. elegans. Methods. 75:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia K, Hart AC, Levine B. 2007. Autophagy genes protect against disease caused by polyglutamine expansion proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. Autophagy. 3(1):21–25. doi: 10.4161/auto.3528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia K, Levine B. 2007. Autophagy is required for dietary restriction-mediated life span extension in C. elegans. Autophagy. 3(6):597–599. doi: 10.4161/auto.4989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia K, Thomas C, Akbar M, Sun Q, Adams-Huet B, Gilpin C, Levine B. 2009. Autophagy genes protect against Salmonella typhimurium infection and mediate insulin signaling-regulated pathogen resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(34):14564–14569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813319106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia R, Zhang J, Jia K. 2019. Neuroendocrine regulation of fat metabolism by autophagy gene atg-18 in C. elegans dauer larvae. FEBS Open Bio. 9(9):1623–1631. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang P, Nishimura T, Sakamaki Y, Itakura E, Hatta T, Natsume T, Mizushima N. 2014. The HOPS complex mediates autophagosome-lysosome fusion through interaction with syntaxin 17. Mol Biol Cell. 25(8):1327–1337. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e13-08-0447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson DW, Llop JR, Farrell SF, Yuan J, Stolzenburg LR, Samuelson AV. 2014. The Caenorhabditis elegans Myc-Mondo/Mad complexes integrate diverse longevity signals. PLoS Genet. 10(4):e1004278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kadekar P, Roy R. 2019. AMPK regulates germline stem cell quiescence and integrity through an endogenous small RNA pathway. PLoS Biol. 17(6):e3000309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kagohashi Y, Sasaki M, May AI, Kawamata T, Ohsumi Y. 2023. The mechanism of Atg15-mediated membrane disruption in autophagy. J Cell Biol. 222(12):e202306120. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202306120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, Nagano K, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. 2000. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J Cell Biol. 150(6):1507–1513. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang C, Avery L. 2009. Systemic regulation of starvation response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 23(1):12–17. doi: 10.1101/gad.1723409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang D, Kirienko DR, Webster P, Fisher AL, Kirienko NV. 2018. Pyoverdine, a siderophore from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, translocates into C. elegans, removes iron, and activates a distinct host response. Virulence. 9(1):804–817. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1449508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang C, You YJ, Avery L. 2007. Dual roles of autophagy in the survival of Caenorhabditis elegans during starvation. Genes Dev. 21(17):2161–2171. doi: 10.1101/gad.1573107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katsumata K, Nishiyama J, Inoue T, Mizushima N, Takeda J, Yuzaki M. 2010. Dynein- and activity-dependent retrograde transport of autophagosomes in neuronal axons. Autophagy. 6(3):378–385. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.3.11262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. 2018. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19(6):365–381. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik S, Tasset I, Arias E, Pampliega O, Wong E, Martinez-Vicente M, Cuervo AM. 2021. Autophagy and the hallmarks of aging. Ageing Res Rev. 72:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. 1993. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 366(6454):461–464. doi: 10.1038/366461a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khazaeli AA, Tatar M, Pletcher SD, Curtsinger JW. 1997. Heat-induced longevity extension in Drosophila. I. Heat treatment, mortality, and thermotolerance. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 52(1):B48–B52. doi: 10.1093/gerona/52A.1.B48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kihara A, Noda T, Ishihara N, Ohsumi Y. 2001. Two distinct Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes function in autophagy and carboxypeptidase Y sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 152(3):519–530. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H-J, Cho M-H, Shim WH, Kim JK, Jeon E-Y, Kim D-H, Yoon S-Y. 2017. Deficient autophagy in microglia impairs synaptic pruning and causes social behavioral defects. Mol Psychiatry. 22(11):1576–1584. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim DH, Ewbank JJ. 2018. Signaling in the innate immune response. WormBook. 2018:1–35. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.83.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimble J, Crittenden, SL. 2005. Germline proliferation and its control. In: WormBook, editor. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. p. 1–14. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.13.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kimble JE, White JG. 1981. On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 81(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura KD, Tissenbaum HA, Liu Y, Ruvkun G. 1997. daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 277(5328):942–946. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirienko NV, Ausubel FM, Ruvkun G. 2015. Mitophagy confers resistance to siderophore-mediated killing by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(6):1821–1826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424954112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirienko NV, Kirienko DR, Larkins-Ford J, Wählby C, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM. 2013. Pseudomonas aeruginosa disrupts Caenorhabditis elegans iron homeostasis, causing a hypoxic response and death. Cell Host Microbe. 13(4):406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkwood TB. 1977. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 270(5635):301–304. doi: 10.1038/270301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkwood TB, Austad SN. 2000. Why do we age? Nature. 408(6809):233–238. doi: 10.1038/35041682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klionsky DJ, Cregg JM, Dunn WA Jr, Emr SD, Sakai Y, Sandoval IV, Sibirny A, Subramani S, Thumm M, Veenhuis M, et al. 2003. A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes. Dev Cell. 5(4):539–545. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00296-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klionsky DJ, Petroni G, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Ballabio A, Boya P, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Cadwell K, Cecconi F, Choi AMK, et al. 2021. Autophagy in major human diseases. EMBO J. 40(19):e108863. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021108863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kocsisova Z, Kornfeld K, Schedl T. 2019. Rapid population-wide declines in stem cell number and activity during reproductive aging in C. elegans. Development. 146:dev173195. doi: 10.1242/dev.173195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komatsu M, Ueno T, Waguri S, Uchiyama Y, Kominami E, Tanaka K. 2007. Constitutive autophagy: vital role in clearance of unfavorable proteins in neurons. Cell Death Differ. 14(5):887–894. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korta DZ, Hubbard EJ. 2010. Soma-germline interactions that influence germline proliferation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Dyn. 239(5):1449–1459. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotani T, Kirisako H, Koizumi M, Ohsumi Y, Nakatogawa H. 2018. The Atg2-Atg18 complex tethers pre-autophagosomal membranes to the endoplasmic reticulum for autophagosome formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115(41):10363–10368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806727115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristensen TN, Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V. 2003. Mild heat stress at a young age in Drosophila melanogaster leads to increased Hsp70 synthesis after stress exposure later in life. J Genet. 82(3):89–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02715811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuchitsu Y, Taguchi T. 2023. Lysosomal microautophagy: an emerging dimension in mammalian autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 34(7):606–616. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni VV, Anand A, Herr JB, Miranda C, Vogel MC, Maday S. 2021. Synaptic activity controls autophagic vacuole motility and function in dendrites. J Cell Biol. 220(6):e202002084. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202002084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni AS, Gubbi S, Barzilai N. 2020. Benefits of metformin in attenuating the hallmarks of aging. Cell Metab. 32(1):15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar AV, Kang T, Thakurta TG, Ng C, Rogers AN, Larsen MR, Lapierre LR. 2022. Exportin 1 modulates life span by regulating nucleolar dynamics via the autophagy protein LGG-1/GABARAP. Sci Adv. 8(13):eabj1604. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar AV, Mills J, Parker WM, Leitão JA, Rodriguez DI, Daigle SE, Ng C, Patel R, Aguilera JL, Johnson JR, et al. 2023. Lipid droplets modulate proteostasis, SQST-1/SQSTM1 dynamics, and lifespan in C. elegans. iScience. 26(10):107960. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumsta C, Chang JT, Lee R, Tan EP, Yang Y, Loureiro R, Choy EH, Lim SHY, Saez I, Springhorn A, et al. 2019. The autophagy receptor p62/SQST-1 promotes proteostasis and longevity in C. elegans by inducing autophagy. Nat Commun. 10(1):5648. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13540-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumsta C, Chang JT, Schmalz J, Hansen M. 2017. Hormetic heat stress and HSF-1 induce autophagy to improve survival and proteostasis in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 8(1):14337. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuo CJ, Hansen M, Troemel E. 2018. Autophagy and innate immunity: insights from invertebrate model organisms. Autophagy. 14(2):233–242. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1389824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurz CL, Tan MW. 2004. Regulation of aging and innate immunity in C. elegans. Aging Cell. 3(4):185–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lagier-Tourenne C, Cleveland DW. 2010. Neurodegeneration: an expansion in ALS genetics. Nature. 466(7310):1052–1053. doi: 10.1038/4661052a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lagier-Tourenne C, Polymenidou M, Cleveland DW. 2010. TDP-43 and FUS/TLS: emerging roles in RNA processing and neurodegeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 19(R1):R46–R64. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamark T, Johansen T. 2021. Mechanisms of selective autophagy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 37(1):143–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120219-035530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. 2013. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 14(12):759–774. doi: 10.1038/nrm3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langemeyer L, Fröhlich F, Ungermann C. 2018. Rab GTPase function in endosome and lysosome biogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 28(11):957–970. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lapierre LR, De Magalhaes Filho CD, McQuary PR, Chu C-C, Visvikis O, Chang JT, Gelino S, Ong B, Davis AE, Irazoqui JE, et al. 2013. The TFEB orthologue HLH-30 regulates autophagy and modulates longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 4(1):2267. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lapierre LR, Gelino S, Melendez A, Hansen M. 2011. Autophagy and lipid metabolism coordinately modulate life span in germline-less C. elegans. Curr Biol. 21(18):1507–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lapierre LR, Melendez A, Hansen M. 2012. Autophagy links lipid metabolism to longevity in C. elegans. Autophagy. 8(1):144–146. doi: 10.4161/auto.8.1.18722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Largeau C, Legouis R. 2019. Correlative light and electron microscopy to analyze LC3 proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Methods Mol Biol. 1880:281–293. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8873-0_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazaro-Pena MI, Cornwell AB, Diaz-Balzac CA, Das R, Ward ZC, Macoretta N, Thakar J, Samuelson AV. 2023. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase maintains neuronal homeostasis during normal Caenorhabditis elegans aging and systemically regulates longevity from serotonergic and GABAergic neurons. Elife. 12:e85792. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Bourg ÉL, Minois N, Bullens P, Baret P. 2000. A mild stress due to hypergravity exposure at young age increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster males. Biogerontology. 1(2):145–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1010043914016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JA. 2012. Neuronal autophagy: a housekeeper or a fighter in neuronal cell survival? Exp Neurobiol. 21(1):1–8. doi: 10.5607/en.2012.21.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SS, Lee RY, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Ruvkun G. 2003. A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nat Genet. 33(1):40–48. doi: 10.1038/ng1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SJ, Murphy CT, Kenyon C. 2009. Glucose shortens the life span of C. elegans by downregulating DAF-16/FOXO activity and aquaporin gene expression. Cell Metab. 10(5):379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee S, Sato Y, Nixon RA. 2011. Lysosomal proteolysis inhibition selectively disrupts axonal transport of degradative organelles and causes an Alzheimer's-like axonal dystrophy. J Neurosci. 31(21):7817–7830. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6412-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine B, Deretic V. 2007. Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 7(10):767–777. doi: 10.1038/nri2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine B, Kroemer G. 2019. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell. 176(1–2):11–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. 2017. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 17(9):528–542. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Chen B, Zou W, Wang X, Wu Y, Zhao D, Sun Y, Liu Y, Chen L, Miao L, et al. 2016. The lysosomal membrane protein SCAV-3 maintains lysosome integrity and adult longevity. J Cell Biol. 215(2):167–185. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201602090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Wang X, Li M, Yang C, Wang X. 2022. M05b5.4 (lysosomal phospholipase A2) promotes disintegration of autophagic vesicles to maintain C. elegans development. Autophagy. 18(3):595–607. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1943178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W, Zou W, Yang Y, Chai Y, Chen B, Cheng S, Tian D, Wang X, Vale RD, Ou G. 2012. Autophagy genes function sequentially to promote apoptotic cell corpse degradation in the engulfing cell. J Cell Biol. 197(1):27–35. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201111053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Q, Yang P, Tian E, Han J, Zhang H. 2012. The C. elegans ATG101 homolog EPG-9 directly interacts with EPG-1/Atg13 and is essential for autophagy. Autophagy. 8(10):1426–1433. doi: 10.4161/auto.21163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieber T, Jeedigunta SP, Palozzi JM, Lehmann R, Hurd TR. 2019. Mitochondrial fragmentation drives selective removal of deleterious mtDNA in the germline. Nature. 570(7761):380–384. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1213-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman OJ, McGuirt AF, Tang G, Sulzer D. 2019. Roles for neuronal and glial autophagy in synaptic pruning during development. Neurobiol Dis. 122:49–63. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim C-Y, Lin H-T, Kumsta C, Lu T-C, Wang F-Y, Kang Y-H, Hansen M, Ching T-T, Hsu A-L. 2023. SAMS-1 coordinates HLH-30/TFEB and PHA-4/FOXA activities through histone methylation to mediate dietary restriction-induced autophagy and longevity. Autophagy. 19(1):224–240. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2068267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim Y, Rubio-Peña K, Sobraske PJ, Molina PA, Brookes PS, Galy V, Nehrke K. 2019. Fndc-1 contributes to paternal mitochondria elimination in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 454(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin K, Dorman JB, Rodan A, Kenyon C. 1997. daf-16: an HNF-3/forkhead family member that can function to double the life-span of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 278(5341):1319–1322. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin L, Yang P, Huang X, Zhang H, Lu Q, Zhang H. 2013. The scaffold protein EPG-7 links cargo-receptor complexes with the autophagic assembly machinery. J Cell Biol. 201(1):113–129. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201209098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling YM, Shaw MH, Ayala C, Coppens I, Taylor GA, Ferguson DJP, Yap GS. 2006. Vacuolar and plasma membrane stripping and autophagic elimination of Toxoplasma gondii in primed effector macrophages. J Exp Med. 203(9):2063–2071. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lithgow GJ, White TM, Melov S, Johnson TE. 1995. Thermotolerance and extended life-span conferred by single-gene mutations and induced by thermal stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92(16):7540–7544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J, Gu Y, Guo M, Ji X. 2021a. Neuroprotective effects and mechanisms of ischemic/hypoxic preconditioning on neurological diseases. CNS Neurosci Ther. 27(8):869–882. doi: 10.1111/cns.13642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu N, Zhao H, Zhao YG, Hu J, Zhang H. 2021b. Atlastin 2/3 regulate ER targeting of the ULK1 complex to initiate autophagy. J Cell Biol. 220(7):e202012091. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202012091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, Zou W, Yang P, Wang L, Ma Y, Zhang H, Wang X. 2018. Autophagy-dependent ribosomal RNA degradation is essential for maintaining nucleotide homeostasis during C. elegans development. Elife. 7:e36588. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu G, Wu Z, Shang J, Xie Z, Chen C, zhang C. 2021. The effects of metformin on autophagy. Biomed Pharmacother. 137:111286. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Q, Yang P, Huang X, Hu W, Guo B, Wu F, Lin L, Kovács A, Yu L, Zhang H. 2011. The WD40 repeat PtdIns(3)P-binding protein EPG-6 regulates progression of omegasomes to autophagosomes. Dev Cell. 21(2):343–357. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo S, Murphy CT. 2011. Caenorhabditis elegans reproductive aging: regulation and underlying mechanisms. Genesis. 49(2):53–65. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Y-C, Dai L-L, Qiu B-B, Zhou Y, Zhao Y-Q, Ran Y, Zhang K-Q, Zou C-G. 2021. TOR functions as a molecular switch connecting an iron cue with host innate defense against bacterial infection. PLoS Genet. 17(3):e1009383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maday S, Holzbaur ELF. 2014. Autophagosome biogenesis in primary neurons follows an ordered and spatially regulated pathway. Dev Cell. 30(1):71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maday S, Wallace KE, Holzbaur EL. 2012. Autophagosomes initiate distally and mature during transport toward the cell soma in primary neurons. J Cell Biol. 196(4):407–417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201106120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maeda S, Otomo C, Otomo T. 2019. The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes. Elife. 8:e45777. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maglioni S, Schiavi A, Runci A, Shaik A, Ventura N. 2014. Mitochondrial stress extends lifespan in C. elegans through neuronal hormesis. Exp Gerontol. 56:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manil-Ségalen M, Lefebvre C, Jenzer C, Trichet M, Boulogne C, Satiat-Jeunemaitre B, Legouis R. 2014. The C. elegans LC3 acts downstream of GABARAP to degrade autophagosomes by interacting with the HOPS subunit VPS39. Dev Cell. 28(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martina JA, Chen Y, Gucek M, Puertollano R. 2012. MTORC1 functions as a transcriptional regulator of autophagy by preventing nuclear transport of TFEB. Autophagy. 8(6):903–914. doi: 10.4161/auto.19653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martineau CN, Kirienko NV, Pujol N. 2021. Innate immunity in C. elegans. Curr Top Dev Biol. 144:309–351. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez J, Almendinger J, Oberst A, Ness R, Dillon CP, Fitzgerald P, Hengartner MO, Green DR. 2011. Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 alpha (LC3)-associated phagocytosis is required for the efficient clearance of dead cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(42):17396–17401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113421108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Martinez NJ, Ow MC, Barrasa MI, Hammell M, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Roth FP, Ambros VR, Walhout AJM. 2008. A C. elegans genome-scale microRNA network contains composite feedback motifs with high flux capacity. Genes Dev. 22(18):2535–2549. doi: 10.1101/gad.1678608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsui T, Jiang P, Nakano S, Sakamaki Y, Yamamoto H, Mizushima N. 2018. Autophagosomal YKT6 is required for fusion with lysosomes independently of syntaxin 17. J Cell Biol. 217(8):2633–2645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201712058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McEwan DG. 2017. Host-pathogen interactions and subversion of autophagy. Essays Biochem. 61(6):687–697. doi: 10.1042/EBC20170058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McEwan D, Popovic D, Gubas A, Terawaki S, Suzuki H, Stadel D, Coxon F, Miranda de Stegmann D, Bhogaraju S, Maddi K, et al. 2015. PLEKHM1 regulates autophagosome-lysosome fusion through HOPS complex and LC3/GABARAP proteins. Mol Cell. 57(1):39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMahon L, Muriel JM, Roberts B, Quinn M, Johnstone IL. 2003. Two sets of interacting collagens form functionally distinct substructures within a Caenorhabditis elegans extracellular matrix. Mol Biol Cell. 14(4):1366–1378. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-08-0479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McQuary PR, Liao C-Y, Chang JT, Kumsta C, She X, Davis A, Chu C-C, Gelino S, Gomez-Amaro RL, Petrascheck M, et al. 2016. C. elegans S6K mutants require a creatine-kinase-like effector for lifespan extension. Cell Rep. 14(9):2059–2067. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meléndez A, Hall DH, Hansen M. 2008. Monitoring the role of autophagy in C. elegans aging. Methods Enzymol. 451:493–520. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meléndez A, Tallóczy Z, Seaman M, Eskelinen E-L, Hall DH, Levine B. 2003. Autophagy genes are essential for dauer development and life-span extension in C. elegans. Science. 301(5638):1387–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1087782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melentijevic I, Toth ML, Arnold ML, Guasp RJ, Harinath G, Nguyen KC, Taub D, Parker JA, Neri C, Gabel CV, et al. 2017. C. elegans neurons jettison protein aggregates and mitochondria under neurotoxic stress. Nature. 542(7641):367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature21362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Memisoglu G, Haber JE. 2019. Dephosphorylation of the Atg1 kinase complex by type 2C protein phosphatases. Mol Cell Oncol. 6(3):1588658. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2019.1588658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meng J, Han L, Zheng N, Wang T, Xu H, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, Zheng Q, Zhang X, et al. 2022. Microglial Tmem59 deficiency impairs phagocytosis of synapse and leads to autism-like behaviors in mice. J Neurosci. 42(25):4958–4979. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1644-21.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menzies FM, Fleming A, Rubinsztein DC. 2015. Compromised autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 16(6):345–357. doi: 10.1038/nrn3961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer JM, Neely A, Stintzi A, Georges C, Holder IA. 1996. Pyoverdin is essential for virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. 64(2):518–523. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.2.518-523.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miao G, Zhang Y, Chen D, Zhang H. 2020. The ER-localized transmembrane protein TMEM39A/SUSR2 regulates autophagy by controlling the trafficking of the PtdIns(4)P phosphatase SAC1. Mol Cell. 77(3):618–632.e615. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michaelson D, Korta DZ, Capua Y, Hubbard EJ. 2010. Insulin signaling promotes germline proliferation in C. elegans. Development. 137(4):671–680. doi: 10.1242/dev.042523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michikawa Y, Mazzucchelli F, Bresolin N, Scarlato G, Attardi G. 1999. Aging-dependent large accumulation of point mutations in the human mtDNA control region for replication. Science. 286(5440):774–779. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Min H, Lee YU, Shim YH, Kawasaki I. 2019. Autophagy of germ-granule components, PGL-1 and PGL-3, contributes to DNA damage-induced germ cell apoptosis in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 15(5):e1008150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minnerly J, Zhang J, Parker T, Kaul T, Jia K. 2017. The cell non-autonomous function of ATG-18 is essential for neuroendocrine regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan. PLoS Genet. 13(5):e1006764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirza Z, Walhout AJM, Ambros V. 2023. A bacterial pathogen induces developmental slowing by high reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Rep. 42(10):113189. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizushima N. 2010. The role of the Atg1/ULK1 complex in autophagy regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 22(2):132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizushima N. 2020. The ATG conjugation systems in autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 63:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizushima N, Komatsu M. 2011. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 147(4):728–741. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. 2008. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 451(7182):1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molina P, Lim Y, Boyd L. 2019. Ubiquitination is required for the initial removal of paternal organelles in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 453(2):168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mony VK, Drangowska-Way A, Albert R, Harrison E, Ghaddar A, Horak MK, Ke W, O'Rourke EJ. 2021. Context-specific regulation of lysosomal lipolysis through network-level diverting of transcription factor interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118(41):e2104832118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104832118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morley JF, Brignull HR, Weyers JJ, Morimoto RI. 2002. The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99(16):10417–10422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152161099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morley JF, Morimoto RI. 2004. Regulation of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans by heat shock factor and molecular chaperones. Mol Biol Cell. 15(2):657–664. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-07-0532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mortimore GE, Hutson NJ, Surmacz CA. 1983. Quantitative correlation between proteolysis and macro- and microautophagy in mouse hepatocytes during starvation and refeeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 80(8):2179–2183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mortimore GE, Lardeux BR, Adams CE. 1988. Regulation of microautophagy and basal protein turnover in rat liver. Effects of short-term starvation. J Biol Chem. 263(5):2506–2512. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69235-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muñoz-Jiménez C, Ayuso C, Dobrzynska A, Torres-Mendéz A, Ruiz PdlC, Askjaer P. 2017. An efficient FLP-based toolkit for spatiotemporal control of gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 206(4):1763–1778. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.201012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura S, Karalay Ö, Jäger PS, Horikawa M, Klein C, Nakamura K, Latza C, Templer SE, Dieterich C, Antebi A. 2016. Mondo complexes regulate TFEB via TOR inhibition to promote longevity in response to gonadal signals. Nat Commun. 7(1):10944. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura S, Oba M, Suzuki M, Takahashi A, Yamamuro T, Fujiwara M, Ikenaka K, Minami S, Tabata N, Yamamoto K, et al. 2019. Suppression of autophagic activity by Rubicon is a signature of aging. Nat Commun. 10(1):847. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08729-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Nakatogawa H. 2020. Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 21(8):439–458. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narbonne P, Roy R. 2006. Inhibition of germline proliferation during C. elegans dauer development requires PTEN, LKB1 and AMPK signalling. Development. 133(4):611–619. doi: 10.1242/dev.02232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nazio F, Strappazzon F, Antonioli M, Bielli P, Cianfanelli V, Bordi M, Gretzmeier C, Dengjel J, Piacentini M, Fimia GM, et al. 2013. mTOR inhibits autophagy by controlling ULK1 ubiquitylation, self-association and function through AMBRA1 and TRAF6. Nat Cell Biol. 15(4):406–416. doi: 10.1038/ncb2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Negishi T, Kitagawa S, Horii N, Tanaka Y, Haruta N, Sugimoto A, Sawa H, Hayashi K-I, Harata M, Kanemaki MT. 2022. The auxin-inducible degron 2 (AID2) system enables controlled protein knockdown during embryogenesis and development in Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 220(2):iyab218. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng MYW, Wai T, Simonsen A. 2021. Quality control of the mitochondrion. Dev Cell. 56(7):881–905. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen TN, Padman BS, Usher J, Oorschot V, Ramm G, Lazarou M. 2016. Atg8 family LC3/GABARAP proteins are crucial for autophagosome-lysosome fusion but not autophagosome formation during PINK1/Parkin mitophagy and starvation. J Cell Biol. 215(6):857–874. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicolas-Avila JA, Pena-Couso L, Munoz-Canoves P, Hidalgo A. 2022. Macrophages, metabolism and heterophagy in the heart. Circ Res. 130(3):418–431. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicolas-Avila JA, Sanchez-Diaz M, Hidalgo A. 2021. Isolation of exophers from cardiomyocyte-reporter mouse strains by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. STAR Protoc. 2(1):100286. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikoletopoulou V, Sidiropoulou K, Kallergi E, Dalezios Y, Tavernarakis N. 2017. Modulation of autophagy by BDNF underlies synaptic plasticity. Cell Metab. 26(1):230–242.e235. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noda NN, Fujioka Y. 2015. Atg1 family kinases in autophagy initiation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 72(16):3083–3096. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1917-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noda NN, Wang Z, Zhang H. 2020. Liquid-liquid phase separation in autophagy. J Cell Biol. 219(8):e202004062. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202004062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohsumi Y. 2014. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res. 24(1):9–23. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oku M, Sakai Y. 2018. Three distinct types of microautophagy based on membrane dynamics and molecular machineries. Bioessays. 40(6):e1800008. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onken B, Driscoll M. 2010. Metformin induces a dietary restriction-like state and the oxidative stress response to extend C. elegans Healthspan via AMPK, LKB1, and SKN-1. PLoS One. 5(1):e8758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Rourke EJ, Ruvkun G. 2013. MXL-3 and HLH-30 transcriptionally link lipolysis and autophagy to nutrient availability. Nat Cell Biol. 15(6):668–676. doi: 10.1038/ncb2741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Rourke EJ, Soukas AA, Carr CE, Ruvkun G. 2009. C. elegans major fats are stored in vesicles distinct from lysosome-related organelles. Cell Metab. 10(5):430–435. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osawa T, Kotani T, Kawaoka T, Hirata E, Suzuki K, Nakatogawa H, Ohsumi Y, Noda NN. 2019. Atg2 mediates direct lipid transfer between membranes for autophagosome formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 26(4):281–288. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otera H, Wang C, Cleland MM, Setoguchi K, Yokota S, Youle RJ, Mihara K. 2010. Mff is an essential factor for mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1 during mitochondrial fission in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 191(6):1141–1158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ou G, Stuurman N, D'Ambrosio M, Vale RD. 2010. Polarized myosin produces unequal-size daughters during asymmetric cell division. Science. 330(6004):677–680. doi: 10.1126/science.1196112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ou G, Vale RD. 2009. Molecular signatures of cell migration in C. elegans Q neuroblasts. J Cell Biol. 185(1):77–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palikaras K, Lionaki E, Tavernarakis N. 2015. Coordination of mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis during ageing in C. elegans. Nature. 521(7553):525–528. doi: 10.1038/nature14300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palikaras K, Lionaki E, Tavernarakis N. 2018. Mechanisms of mitophagy in cellular homeostasis, physiology and pathology. Nat Cell Biol. 20(9):1013–1022. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0176-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmisano NJ, Meléndez A. 2019. Autophagy in C. elegans development. Dev Biol. 447(1):103–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papadopoulos C, Kravic B, Meyer H. 2020. Repair or lysophagy: dealing with damaged lysosomes. J Mol Biol. 432(1):231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papandreou ME, Konstantinidis G, Tavernarakis N. 2023. Nucleophagy delays aging and preserves germline immortality. Nat Aging. 3(1):34–46. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00327-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park MH, Wolff EC. 2018. Hypusine, a polyamine-derived amino acid critical for eukaryotic translation. J Biol Chem. 293(48):18710–18718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.003341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pazdernik N, Schedl T. 2013. Introduction to germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Adv Exp Med Biol. 757:1–16. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pekar O, Ow MC, Hui KY, Noyes MB, Hall SE, Hubbard EJA. 2017. Linking the environment, DAF-7/TGFbeta signaling and LAG-2/DSL ligand expression in the germline stem cell niche. Development. 144(16):2896–2906. doi: 10.1242/dev.147660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña-Llopis S, Vega-Rubin-de-Celis S, Schwartz JC, Wolff NC, Tran TAT, Zou L, Xie X-J, Corey DR, Brugarolas J. 2011. Regulation of TFEB and V-ATPases by mTORC1. EMBO J. 30(16):3242–3258. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pena-Martinez C, Rickman AD, Heckmann BL. 2022. Beyond autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis and endocytosis. Sci Adv. 8(43):eabn1702. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña-Ramos O, Chiao L, Liu X, Yu X, Yao T, He H, Zhou Z. 2022. Autophagosomes fuse to phagosomes and facilitate the degradation of apoptotic cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife. 11:e72466. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pepper AS, Killian DJ, Hubbard EJ. 2003. Genetic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans glp-1 mutants suggests receptor interaction or competition. GENETICS. 163(1):115–132. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez CL, Van Gilst MR. 2008. A 13C isotope labeling strategy reveals the influence of insulin signaling on lipogenesis in C. elegans. Cell Metab. 8(3):266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickles S, Vigié P, Youle RJ. 2018. Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Curr Biol. 28(4):R170–R185. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pietrocola F, Kroemer G. 2017. Metformin: a metabolic modulator. Oncotarget. 8(6):9017–9020. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ploumi C, Daskalaki I, Tavernarakis N. 2017. Mitochondrial biogenesis and clearance: a balancing act. FEBS J. 284(2):183–195. doi: 10.1111/febs.13820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ploumi C, Kyriakakis E, Tavernarakis N. 2023. Coupling of autophagy and the mitochondrial intrinsic apoptosis pathway modulates proteostasis and ageing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Dis. 14(2):110. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05638-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Politi Y, Gal L, Kalifa Y, Ravid L, Elazar Z, Arama E. 2014. Paternal mitochondrial destruction after fertilization is mediated by a common endocytic and autophagic pathway in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 29(3):305–320. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Possik E, Klein L-L, Sanjab P, Zhu R, Côté L, Bai Y, Zhang D, Sun H, Al-Mass A, Oppong A, et al. 2023. Glycerol 3-phosphate phosphatase/PGPH-2 counters metabolic stress and promotes healthy aging via a glycogen sensing-AMPK-HLH-30-autophagy axis in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 14(1):5214. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40857-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Possik E, Schmitt C, Al-Mass A, Bai Y, Côté L, Morin J, Erb H, Oppong A, Kahloan W, Parker JA, et al. 2022. Phosphoglycolate phosphatase homologs act as glycerol-3-phosphate phosphatase to control stress and healthspan in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 13(1):177. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27803-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prentki M, Madiraju SR. 2008. Glycerolipid metabolism and signaling in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 29(6):647–676. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prentki M, Peyot ML, Masiello P, Madiraju SRM. 2020. Nutrient-Induced metabolic stress, adaptation, detoxification, and toxicity in the pancreatic beta-cell. Diabetes. 69(3):279–290. doi: 10.2337/dbi19-0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proikas-Cezanne T, Takacs Z, Donnes P, Kohlbacher O. 2015. WIPI proteins: essential PtdIns3P effectors at the nascent autophagosome. J Cell Sci. 128:207–217. doi: 10.1242/jcs.146258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puertollano R, Ferguson SM, Brugarolas J, Ballabio A. 2018. The complex relationship between TFEB transcription factor phosphorylation and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 37(11):e98804. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puri C, Renna M, Bento CF, Moreau K, Rubinsztein DC. 2014. ATG16L1 meets ATG9 in recycling endosomes: additional roles for the plasma membrane and endocytosis in autophagosome biogenesis. Autophagy. 10(1):182–184. doi: 10.4161/auto.27174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qadota H, Inoue M, Hikita T, Köppen M, Hardin JD, Amano M, Moerman DG, Kaibuchi K. 2007. Establishment of a tissue-specific RNAi system in C. elegans. Gene. 400(1–2):166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qu X, Zou Z, Sun Q, Luby-Phelps K, Cheng P, Hogan RN, Gilpin C, Levine B. 2007. Autophagy gene-dependent clearance of apoptotic cells during embryonic development. Cell. 128(5):931–946. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raben N, Puertollano R. 2016. TFEB and TFE3: linking lysosomes to cellular adaptation to stress. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 32(1):255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raben N, Roberts A, Plotz PH. 2007. Role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of Pompe disease. Acta Myol. 26:45–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raizen DM, Lee RY, Avery L. 1995. Interacting genes required for pharyngeal excitation by motor neuron MC in Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 141(4):1365–1382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rattan SI. 2008. Hormesis in aging. Ageing Res Rev. 7(1):63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rattan SI, Ali RE. 2007. Hormetic prevention of molecular damage during cellular aging of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1100(1):424–430. doi: 10.1196/annals.1395.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rea SL, Ventura N, Johnson TE. 2007. Relationship between mitochondrial electron transport chain dysfunction, development, and life extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 5(10):e259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddien PW, Cameron S, Horvitz HR. 2001. Phagocytosis promotes programmed cell death in C. elegans. Nature. 412(6843):198–202. doi: 10.1038/35084096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddien PW, Horvitz HR. 2004. The engulfment process of programmed cell death in caenorhabditis elegans. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 20(1):193–221. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.022003.114619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reza RN, Serra ND, Detwiler AC, Hanna-Rose W, Crook M. 2022. Noncanonical necrosis in 2 different cell types in a Caenorhabditis elegans NAD+ salvage pathway mutant. G3 (Bethesda). 12(4):jkac033. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizzuto R, De Stefani D, Raffaello A, Mammucari C. 2012. Mitochondria as sensors and regulators of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 13(9):566–578. doi: 10.1038/nrm3412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robida-Stubbs S, Glover-Cutter K, Lamming DW, Mizunuma M, Narasimhan SD, Neumann-Haefelin E, Sabatini DM, Blackwell TK. 2012. TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO. Cell Metab. 15(5):713–724. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roczniak-Ferguson A, Petit CS, Froehlich F, Qian S, Ky J, Angarola B, Walther TC, Ferguson SM. 2012. The transcription factor TFEB links mTORC1 signaling to transcriptional control of lysosome homeostasis. Sci Signal. 5(228):ra42. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rojansky R, Cha MY, Chan DC. 2016. Elimination of paternal mitochondria in mouse embryos occurs through autophagic degradation dependent on PARKIN and MUL1. Elife. 5:e17896. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roux AE, Yuan H, Podshivalova K, Hendrickson D, Kerr R, Kenyon C, Kelley D. 2023. Individual cell types in C. elegans age differently and activate distinct cell-protective responses. Cell Rep. 42(8):112902. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowland AM, Richmond JE, Olsen JG, Hall DH, Bamber BA. 2006. Presynaptic terminals independently regulate synaptic clustering and autophagy of GABAA receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 26(6):1711–1720. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2279-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy D, Michaelson D, Hochman T, Santella A, Bao Z, Goldberg JD, Hubbard EJA. 2016. Cell cycle features of C. elegans germline stem/progenitor cells vary temporally and spatially. Dev Biol. 409(1):261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruck A, Attonito J, Garces KT, Núnez L, Palmisano NJ, Rubel Z, Bai Z, Nguyen KCQ, Sun L, Grant BD, et al. 2011. The Atg6/Vps30/Beclin 1 ortholog BEC-1 mediates endocytic retrograde transport in addition to autophagy in C. elegans. Autophagy. 7(4):386–400. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.4.14391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruckenstuhl C, Netzberger C, Entfellner I, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Kickenweiz T, Stekovic S, Gleixner C, Schmid C, Klug L, Sorgo AG, et al. 2014. Lifespan extension by methionine restriction requires autophagy-dependent vacuolar acidification. PLoS Genet. 10(5):e1004347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell RC, Yuan HX, Guan KL. 2014. Autophagy regulation by nutrient signaling. Cell Res. 24(1):42–57. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryu D, Mouchiroud L, Andreux PA, Katsyuba E, Moullan N, Nicolet-dit-Félix AA, Williams EG, Jha P, Lo Sasso G, Huzard D, et al. 2016. Urolithin A induces mitophagy and prolongs lifespan in C. elegans and increases muscle function in rodents. Nat Med. 22(8):879–888. doi: 10.1038/nm.4132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saftig P, Schroder B, Blanz J. 2010. Lysosomal membrane proteins: life between acid and neutral conditions. Biochem Soc Trans. 38(6):1420–1423. doi: 10.1042/BST0381420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu R, Kaushik S, Clement CC, Cannizzo ES, Scharf B, Follenzi A, Potolicchio I, Nieves E, Cuervo AM, Santambrogio L. 2011. Microautophagy of cytosolic proteins by late endosomes. Dev Cell. 20(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samara C, Syntichaki P, Tavernarakis N. 2008. Autophagy is required for necrotic cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ. 15(1):105–112. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samara C, Tavernarakis N. 2008. Autophagy and cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Pharm Des. 14(2):97–115. doi: 10.2174/138161208783378770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samokhvalov V, Scott BA, Crowder CM. 2008. Autophagy protects against hypoxic injury in C. elegans. Autophagy. 4(8):1034–1041. doi: 10.4161/auto.6994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuelson AV, Carr CE, Ruvkun G. 2007. Gene activities that mediate increased life span of C. elegans insulin-like signaling mutants. Genes Dev. 21(22):2976–2994. doi: 10.1101/gad.1588907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandoval H, Thiagarajan P, Dasgupta SK, Schumacher A, Prchal JT, Chen M, Wang J. 2008. Essential role for Nix in autophagic maturation of erythroid cells. Nature. 454(7201):232–235. doi: 10.1038/nature07006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanjuan MA, Dillon CP, Tait SWG, Moshiach S, Dorsey F, Connell S, Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Cleveland JL, Withoff S, et al. 2007. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the autophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nature. 450(7173):1253–1257. doi: 10.1038/nature06421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sans CL, Satterwhite DJ, Stoltzman CA, Breen KT, Ayer DE. 2006. MondoA-Mlx heterodimers are candidate sensors of cellular energy status: mitochondrial localization and direct regulation of glycolysis. Mol Cell Biol. 26(13):4863–4871. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00657-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarkis GJ, Kurpiewski MR, Ashcom JD, Jen-Jacobson L, Jacobson LA. 1988. Proteases of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Arch Biochem Biophys. 261(1):80–90. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki T, Kushida Y, Norizuki T, Kosako H, Sato K, Sato M. 2024. ALLO-1- and IKKE-1-dependent positive feedback mechanism promotes the initiation of paternal mitochondrial autophagy. Nat Commun. 15(1):1460. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45863-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato M, Sato K. 2011. Degradation of paternal mitochondria by fertilization-triggered autophagy in C. elegans embryos. Science. 334(6059):1141–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.1210333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato M, Sato K, Tomura K, Kosako H, Sato K. 2018. The autophagy receptor ALLO-1 and the IKKE-1 kinase control clearance of paternal mitochondria in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 20(1):81–91. doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satoh Y, Sato H, Kunitomo H, Fei X, Hashimoto K, Iino Y. 2014. Regulation of experience-dependent bidirectional chemotaxis by a neural circuit switch in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 34(47):15631–15637. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1757-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sauvola CW, Littleton JT. 2021. SNARE regulatory proteins in synaptic vesicle fusion and recycling. Front Mol Neurosci. 14:733138. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.733138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savini M, Folick A, Lee Y-T, Jin F, Cuevas A, Tillman MC, Duffy JD, Zhao Q, Neve IA, Hu P-W, et al. 2022. Lysosome lipid signalling from the periphery to neurons regulates longevity. Nat Cell Biol. 24(6):906–916. doi: 10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaefer AM, Hadwiger GD, Nonet ML. 2000. rpm-1, a conserved neuronal gene that regulates targeting and synaptogenesis in C. elegans. Neuron. 26(2):345–356. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81168-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiavi A, Maglioni S, Palikaras K, Shaik A, Strappazzon F, Brinkmann V, Torgovnick A, Castelein N, De Henau S, Braeckman B, et al. 2015. Iron-starvation-induced mitophagy mediates lifespan extension upon mitochondrial stress in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 25(14):1810–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiavi A, Runci A, Maiorino T, Naso FD, Barenys M, Fritsche E, Strappazzon F, Ventura N. 2022. Cobalt chloride has beneficial effects across species through a hormetic mechanism. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:986835. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.986835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiavi A, Salveridou E, Brinkmann V, Shaik A, Menzel R, Kalyanasundaram S, Nygård S, Nilsen H, Ventura N. 2023. Mitochondria hormesis delays aging and associated diseases in Caenorhabditis elegans impacting on key ferroptosis players. iScience. 26(4):106448. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiavi A, Torgovnick A, Kell A, Megalou E, Castelein N, Guccini I, Marzocchella L, Gelino S, Hansen M, Malisan F, et al. 2013. Autophagy induction extends lifespan and reduces lipid content in response to frataxin silencing in C. elegans. Exp Gerontol. 48(2):191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuck S. 2020. Microautophagy - distinct molecular mechanisms handle cargoes of many sizes. J Cell Sci. 133(17):jcs246322. doi: 10.1242/jcs.246322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulenburg H, Felix MA. 2017. The natural biotic environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 206(1):55–86. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.195511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schweers RL, Zhang J, Randall MS, Loyd MR, Li W, Dorsey FC, Kundu M, Opferman JT, Cleveland JL, Miller JL, et al. 2007. NIX is required for programmed mitochondrial clearance during reticulocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(49):19500–19505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708818104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seah NE, de Magalhaes Filho CD, Petrashen AP, Henderson HR, Laguer J, Gonzalez J, Dillin A, Hansen M, Lapierre LR. 2016. Autophagy-mediated longevity is modulated by lipoprotein biogenesis. Autophagy. 12(2):261–272. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1127464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Settembre C, De Cegli R, Mansueto G, Saha PK, Vetrini F, Visvikis O, Huynh T, Carissimo A, Palmer D, Klisch TJ, et al. 2013a. TFEB controls cellular lipid metabolism through a starvation-induced autoregulatory loop. Nat Cell Biol. 15(6):647–658. doi: 10.1038/ncb2718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Settembre C, Di Malta C, Polito VA, Garcia Arencibia M, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin SU, Huynh T, Medina D, Colella P, et al. 2011. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science. 332(6036):1429–1433. doi: 10.1126/science.1204592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Settembre C, Fraldi A, Jahreiss L, Spampanato C, Venturi C, Medina D, de Pablo R, Tacchetti C, Rubinsztein DC, Ballabio A. 2008. A block of autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 17(1):119–129. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Settembre C, Fraldi A, Medina DL, Ballabio A. 2013b. Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 14(5):283–296. doi: 10.1038/nrm3565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Settembre C, Zoncu R, Medina DL, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin S, Huynh T, Ferron M, Karsenty G, Vellard MC, et al. 2012. A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J. 31(5):1095–1108. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaffer JM, Greenwald I. 2022. Floxed exon (Flexon): a flexibly positioned stop cassette for recombinase-mediated conditional gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 119(3):e2117451119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117451119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheaffer KL, Updike DL, Mango SE. 2008. The Target of Rapamycin pathway antagonizes pha-4/FoxA to control development and aging. Curr Biol. 18(18):1355–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shehata M, Matsumura H, Okubo-Suzuki R, Ohkawa N, Inokuchi K. 2012. Neuronal stimulation induces autophagy in hippocampal neurons that is involved in AMPA receptor degradation after chemical long-term depression. J Neurosci. 32(30):10413–10422. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4533-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheinberger J, Shav-Tal Y. 2017. mRNPs meet stress granules. FEBS Lett. 591(17):2534–2542. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen W, Ganetzky B. 2009. Autophagy promotes synapse development in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 187(1):71–79. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidibe DK, Vogel MC, Maday S. 2022. Organization of the autophagy pathway in neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 75:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB. 2003. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model host for Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 71(4):2208–2217. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.4.2208-2217.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simonsen A, Cumming RC, Brech A, Isakson P, Schubert DR, Finley KD. 2008. Promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system enhances longevity and oxidant resistance in adult Drosophila. Autophagy. 4(2):176–184. doi: 10.4161/auto.5269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slawson C, Copeland RJ, Hart GW. 2010. O-GlcNAc signaling: a metabolic link between diabetes and cancer? Trends Biochem Sci. 35(10):547–555. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soukas AA, Kane EA, Carr CE, Melo JA, Ruvkun G. 2009. Rictor/TORC2 regulates fat metabolism, feeding, growth, and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 23(4):496–511. doi: 10.1101/gad.1775409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soukup S-F, Kuenen S, Vanhauwaert R, Manetsberger J, Hernández-Díaz S, Swerts J, Schoovaerts N, Vilain S, Gounko NV, Vints K, et al. 2016. A LRRK2-dependent EndophilinA phosphoswitch is critical for macroautophagy at presynaptic terminals. Neuron. 92(4):829–844. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soykan T, Haucke V, Kuijpers M. 2021. Mechanism of synaptic protein turnover and its regulation by neuronal activity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 69:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2021.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Springhorn A, Hoppe T. 2019. Western blot analysis of the autophagosomal membrane protein LGG-1/LC3 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Enzymol. 619:319–336. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stavoe AK, Hill SE, Hall DH, Colon-Ramos DA. 2016. KIF1A/UNC-104 transports ATG-9 to regulate neurodevelopment and autophagy at synapses. Dev Cell. 38(2):171–185. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stavoe AKH, Holzbaur ELF. 2019. Autophagy in neurons. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 35(1):477–500. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I. 2014. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 16(6):495–501. doi: 10.1038/ncb2979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strome S. 2005. Specification of the germ line. In: WormBook, editor. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. p. 1–10. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.9.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. 1977. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 56(1):110–156. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y, Li M, Zhao D, Li X, Yang C, Wang X. 2020. Lysosome activity is modulated by multiple longevity pathways and is important for lifespan extension in C. elegans. Elife. 9:e55745. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki K, Kubota Y, Sekito T, Ohsumi Y. 2007. Hierarchy of Atg proteins in pre-autophagosomal structure organization. Genes Cells. 12(2):209–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi Y, He H, Tang Z, Hattori T, Liu Y, Young MM, Serfass JM, Chen L, Gebru M, Chen C, et al. 2018. An autophagy assay reveals the ESCRT-III component CHMP2A as a regulator of phagophore closure. Nat Commun. 9(1):2855. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05254-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi Y, Liang X, Hattori T, Tang Z, He H, Chen H, Liu X, Abraham T, Imamura-Kawasawa Y, Buchkovich NJ, et al. 2019. VPS37A directs ESCRT recruitment for phagophore closure. J Cell Biol. 218(10):3336–3354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201902170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takáts S, Pircs K, Nagy P, Varga Á, Kárpáti M, Hegedűs K, Kramer H, Kovács AL, Sass M, Juhász G. 2014. Interaction of the HOPS complex with Syntaxin 17 mediates autophagosome clearance in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell. 25(8):1338–1354. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e13-08-0449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takeshige K, Baba M, Tsuboi S, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. 1992. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J Cell Biol. 119(2):301–311. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang G, Gudsnuk K, Kuo S-H, Cotrina ML, Rosoklija G, Sosunov A, Sonders MS, Kanter E, Castagna C, Yamamoto A, et al. 2014. Loss of mTOR-dependent macroautophagy causes autistic-like synaptic pruning deficits. Neuron. 83(5):1131–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang F, Watkins JW, Bermudez M, Gray R, Gaban A, Portie K, Grace S, Kleve M, Craciun G. 2008. A life-span extending form of autophagy employs the vacuole-vacuole fusion machinery. Autophagy. 4(7):874–886. doi: 10.4161/auto.6556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenen CC, Greenwald I. 2019. Cell non-autonomous function of daf-18/PTEN in the somatic gonad coordinates somatic gonad and germline development in C. elegans dauer larvae. Curr Biol. 29(6):1064–1072.e1068. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y, Li Z, Hu W, Ren H, Tian E, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Huang X, Yang P, Li X, et al. 2010a. C. elegans screen identifies autophagy genes specific to multicellular organisms. Cell. 141(6):1042–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y, Ren H, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Huang X, Yang P, Zhang H. 2010b. Four metazoan autophagy genes regulate cargo recognition, autophagosome formation and autolysosomal degradation. Autophagy. 6(7):984–985. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.7.13156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian E, Wang F, Han J, Zhang H. 2009. epg-1 functions in autophagy-regulated processes and may encode a highly divergent Atg13 homolog in C. elegans. Autophagy. 5(5):608–615. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.5.8624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolkin T, Hubbard EJA. 2021. Germline stem and progenitor cell aging in C. elegans. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9:699671. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.699671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tóth ML, Sigmond T, Borsos É, Barna J, Erdélyi P, Takács-Vellai K, Orosz L, Kovács AL, Csikós G, Sass M, et al. 2008. Longevity pathways converge on autophagy genes to regulate life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Autophagy. 4(3):330–338. doi: 10.4161/auto.5618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toth ML, Simon P, Kovacs AL, Vellai T. 2007. Influence of autophagy genes on ion-channel-dependent neuronal degeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci. 120(6):1134–1141. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Troemel ER. 2011. New models of microsporidiosis: infections in Zebrafish, C. elegans, and honey bee. PLoS Pathog. 7(2):e1001243. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Troemel ER, Felix MA, Whiteman NK, Barriere A, Ausubel FM. 2008. Microsporidia are natural intracellular parasites of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 6(12):2736–2752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. 1993. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 333(1–2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tullet JMA, Hertweck M, An JH, Baker J, Hwang JY, Liu S, Oliveira RP, Baumeister R, Blackwell TK. 2008. Direct inhibition of the longevity-promoting factor SKN-1 by insulin-like signaling in C. elegans. Cell. 132(6):1025–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyzack GE, Luisier R, Taha DM, Neeves J, Modic M, Mitchell JS, Meyer I, Greensmith L, Newcombe J, Ule J, et al. 2019. Widespread FUS mislocalization is a molecular hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain. 142(9):2572–2580. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ulgherait M, Rana A, Rera M, Graniel J, Walker DW. 2014. AMPK modulates tissue and organismal aging in a non-cell-autonomous manner. Cell Rep. 8(6):1767–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valverde DP, Yu S, Boggavarapu V, Kumar N, Lees JA, Walz T, Reinisch KM, Melia TJ. 2019. ATG2 transports lipids to promote autophagosome biogenesis. J Cell Biol. 218(6):1787–1798. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201811139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Horst A, Schavemaker JM, Pellis-van Berkel W, Burgering BM. 2007. The Caenorhabditis elegans nicotinamidase PNC-1 enhances survival. Mech Ageing Dev. 128(4):346–349. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2007.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vázquez-Manrique RP, González-Cabo P, Ros S, Aziz H, Baylis HA, Palau F. 2006. Reduction of Caenorhabditis elegans frataxin increases sensitivity to oxidative stress, reduces lifespan, and causes lethality in a mitochondrial complex II mutant. FASEB J. 20(1):172–174. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4212fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ventura N, Rea SL, Handerson ST, Condò I, Testi R, Johnson TE. 2006. C. elegans as a model for Friedreich Ataxia. FASEB J. 20(7):1029–1030. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-0505ufm. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vergarajauregui S, Connelly PS, Daniels MP, Puertollano R. 2008. Autophagic dysfunction in mucolipidosis type IV patients. Hum Mol Genet. 17(17):2723–2737. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verma P, Gandhi S, Lata K, Chattopadhyay K. 2021. Pore-forming toxins in infection and immunity. Biochem Soc Trans. 49(1):455–465. doi: 10.1042/BST20200836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vijayan V, Verstreken P. 2017. Autophagy in the presynaptic compartment in health and disease. J Cell Biol. 216(7):1895–1906. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201611113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visvikis O, Ihuegbu N, Labed SA, Luhachack LG, Alves A-MF, Wollenberg AC, Stuart LM, Stormo GD, Irazoqui JE. 2014. Innate host defense requires TFEB-mediated transcription of cytoprotective and antimicrobial genes. Immunity. 40(6):896–909. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voutev R, Hubbard EJ. 2008. A “FLP-Out” system for controlled gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. GENETICS. 180(1):103–119. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Arnold ML, Smart AJ, Wang G, Androwski RJ, Morera A, Nguyen KCQ, Schweinsberg PJ, Bai G, Cooper J, et al. 2023. Large vesicle extrusions from C. elegans neurons are consumed and stimulated by glial-like phagocytosis activity of the neighboring cell. Elife. 12:e82227. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang CW, Klionsky DJ. 2003. The molecular mechanism of autophagy. Mol Med. 9(3–4):65–76. doi: 10.1007/BF03402040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Lu Q, Cheng S, Wang X, Zhang H. 2013. Autophagy activity contributes to programmed cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Autophagy. 9(12):1975–1982. doi: 10.4161/auto.26152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z, Miao G, Xue X, Guo X, Yuan C, Wang Z, Zhang G, Chen Y, Feng D, Hu J, et al. 2016. The vici syndrome protein EPG5 is a Rab7 effector that determines the fusion specificity of autophagosomes with late endosomes/lysosomes. Mol Cell. 63(5):781–795. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Niederstrasser H, Douglas PM, Lin R, Jaramillo J, Li Y, Oswald NW, Zhou A, McMillan EA, Mendiratta S, et al. 2017. Small-molecule TFEB pathway agonists that ameliorate metabolic syndrome in mice and extend C. elegans lifespan. Nat Commun. 8(1):2270. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02332-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang MC, O'Rourke EJ, Ruvkun G. 2008. Fat metabolism links germline stem cells and longevity in C. elegans. Science. 322(5903):957–960. doi: 10.1126/science.1162011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z, Zhang H. 2019. Phase separation, transition, and autophagic degradation of proteins in development and pathogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 29(5):417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wani KA, Goswamy D, Taubert S, Ratnappan R, Ghazi A, Irazoqui JE. 2021. NHR-49/PPAR-alpha and HLH-30/TFEB cooperate for C. elegans host defense via a flavin-containing monooxygenase. Elife. 10:e62775. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe Y, Iwasaki Y, Sasaki K, Motono C, Imai K, Suzuki K. 2023. Atg15 is a vacuolar phospholipase that disintegrates organelle membranes. Cell Rep. 42(12):113567. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei Y, Chiang WC, Sumpter R Jr, Mishra P, Levine B. 2017. Prohibitin 2 is an inner mitochondrial membrane mitophagy receptor. Cell. 168(1–2):224–238.e210. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilhelm T, Byrne J, Medina R, Kolundžić E, Geisinger J, Hajduskova M, Tursun B, Richly H. 2017. Neuronal inhibition of the autophagy nucleation complex extends life span in post-reproductive C. elegans. Genes Dev. 31(15):1561–1572. doi: 10.1101/gad.301648.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams BA. 2009. Unique physiology of host-parasite interactions in microsporidia infections. Cell Microbiol. 11(11):1551–1560. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson N, Kataura T, Korsgen ME, Sun C, Sarkar S, Korolchuk VI. 2023. The autophagy-NAD axis in longevity and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 33(9):788–802. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. 2014. The regulation of autophagosome dynamics by huntingtin and HAP1 is disrupted by expression of mutant huntingtin, leading to defective cargo degradation. J Neurosci. 34(4):1293–1305. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1870-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. 2015. Autophagosome dynamics in neurodegeneration at a glance. J Cell Sci. 128(7):1259–1267. doi: 10.1242/jcs.161216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y, Cheng S, Zhao H, Zou W, Yoshina S, Mitani S, Zhang H, Wang X. 2014. PI3P phosphatase activity is required for autophagosome maturation and autolysosome formation. EMBO Rep. 15(9):973–981. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu F, Li Y, Wang F, Noda NN, Zhang H. 2012. Differential function of the two Atg4 homologues in the aggrephagy pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 287(35):29457–29467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.365676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu F, Watanabe Y, Guo X-Y, Qi X, Wang P, Zhao H-Y, Wang Z, Fujioka Y, Zhang H, Ren J-Q, et al. 2015. Structural basis of the differential function of the two C. elegans Atg8 homologs, LGG-1 and LGG-2, in autophagy. Mol Cell. 60(6):914–929. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu L, Zhou B, Oshiro-Rapley N, Li M, Paulo JA, Webster CM, Mou F, Kacergis MC, Talkowski ME, Carr CE, et al. 2016. An ancient, unified mechanism for metformin growth inhibition in C. elegans and cancer. Cell. 167(7):1705–1718.e1713. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xilouri M, Stefanis L. 2010. Autophagy in the central nervous system: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 9(6):701–719. doi: 10.2174/187152710793237421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xuan Z, Yang S, Clark B, Hill SE, Manning L, Colón-Ramos DA. 2023. The active zone protein Clarinet regulates synaptic sorting of ATG-9 and presynaptic autophagy. PLoS Biol. 21(4):e3002030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto-Imoto H, Minami S, Shioda T, Yamashita Y, Sakai S, Maeda S, Yamamoto T, Oki S, Takashima M, Yamamuro T, et al. 2022. Age-associated decline of MondoA drives cellular senescence through impaired autophagy and mitochondrial homeostasis. Cell Rep. 38(9):110444. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto H, Fujioka Y, Suzuki S, Noshiro D, Suzuki H, Kondo-Kakuta C, Kimura Y, Hirano H, Ando T, Noda N, et al. 2016. The intrinsically disordered protein Atg13 mediates supramolecular assembly of autophagy initiation complexes. Dev Cell. 38(1):86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto H, Kakuta S, Watanabe TM, Kitamura A, Sekito T, Kondo-Kakuta C, Ichikawa R, Kinjo M, Ohsumi Y. 2012. Atg9 vesicles are an important membrane source during early steps of autophagosome formation. J Cell Biol. 198(2):219–233. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201202061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y, Arnold ML, Lange CM, Sun LH, Broussalian M, Doroodian S, Ebata H, Choy EH, Poon K, Moreno TM, et al. 2024. Autophagy protein ATG-16.2 and its WD40 domain mediate the beneficial effects of inhibiting early-acting autophagy genes in C. elegans neurons. Nat Aging. 2024;4(2):198–212. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00548-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, Chen D, He Y, Meléndez A, Feng Z, Hong Q, Bai X, Li Q, Cai G, Wang J, et al. 2013a. MiR-34 modulates Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan via repressing the autophagy gene atg9. Age (Dordr). 35(1):11–22. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9324-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y, Coleman M, Zhang L, Zheng X, Yue Z. 2013b. Autophagy in axonal and dendritic degeneration. Trends Neurosci. 36(7):418–428. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y, Klionsky DJ. 2020. Autophagy and disease: unanswered questions. Cell Death Differ. 27(3):858–871. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0480-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S, Park D, Manning L, Hill SE, Cao M, Xuan Z, Gonzalez I, Dong Y, Clark B, Shao L, et al. 2022. Presynaptic autophagy is coupled to the synaptic vesicle cycle via ATG-9. Neuron. 110(5):824–840.e810. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang P, Zhang H. 2011. The coiled-coil domain protein EPG-8 plays an essential role in the autophagy pathway in C. elegans. Autophagy. 7(2):159–165. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.2.14223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang P, Zhang H. 2014. You are what you eat: multifaceted functions of autophagy during C. elegans development. Cell Res. 24(1):80–91. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yla-Anttila P, Vihinen H, Jokitalo E, Eskelinen EL. 2009. 3D tomography reveals connections between the phagophore and endoplasmic reticulum. Autophagy. 5(8):1180–1185. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.8.10274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon TY, Munson M. 2018. SNARE complex assembly and disassembly. Curr Biol. 28(8):R397–R401. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu IM, Hughson FM. 2010. Tethering factors as organizers of intracellular vesicular traffic. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 26(1):137–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu L, McPhee CK, Zheng L, Mardones GA, Rong Y, Peng J, Mi N, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wan F, et al. 2010. Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature. 465(7300):942–946. doi: 10.1038/nature09076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu S, Melia TJ. 2017. The coordination of membrane fission and fusion at the end of autophagosome maturation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 47:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yue Z, Friedman L, Komatsu M, Tanaka K. 2009. The cellular pathways of neuronal autophagy and their implication in neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1793(9):1496–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaninello M, Palikaras K, Sotiriou A, Tavernarakis N, Scorrano L. 2022. Sustained intracellular calcium rise mediates neuronal mitophagy in models of autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Cell Death Differ. 29(1):167–177. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00847-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zarse K, Schulz TJ, Birringer M, Ristow M. 2007. Impaired respiration is positively correlated with decreased life span in Caenorhabditis elegans models of Friedreich Ataxia. FASEB J. 21(4):1271–1275. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6994com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Baehrecke EH. 2015. Eaten alive: novel insights into autophagy from multicellular model systems. Trends Cell Biol. 25(7):376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F, Berg M, Dierking K, Félix MA, Shapira M, Samuel BS, Schulenburg H. 2017a. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for microbiome research. Front Microbiol. 8:485. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Chang JT, Guo B, Hansen M, Jia K, Kovács AL, Kumsta C, Lapierre LR, Legouis R, Lin L, et al. 2015a. Guidelines for monitoring autophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Autophagy. 11:9–27. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2014.1003478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G, Lin L, Qi D, Zhang H. 2017b. The composition of a protein aggregate modulates the specificity and efficiency of its autophagic degradation. Autophagy. 13(9):1487–1495. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1339843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Loyd MR, Randall MS, Waddell MB, Kriwacki RW, Ney PA. 2012. A short linear motif in BNIP3L (NIX) mediates mitochondrial clearance in reticulocytes. Autophagy. 8(9):1325–1332. doi: 10.4161/auto.20764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Qi L, Zhang H. 2019. TGFbeta-like DAF-7 acts as a systemic signal for autophagy regulation in C. elegans. J Cell Biol. 218(12):3998–4006. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G, Sachse M, Prevost MC, Luallen RJ, Troemel ER, Félix M-A. 2016. A large collection of novel nematode-infecting microsporidia and their diverse interactions with Caenorhabditis elegans and other related nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 12(12):e1006093. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G, Wang Z, Du Z, Zhang H. 2018. mTOR regulates phase separation of PGL granules to modulate their autophagic degradation. Cell. 174(6):1492–1506.e1422. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Ward JD, Cheng Z, Dernburg AF. 2015b. The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development. 142:4374–4384. doi: 10.1242/dev.129635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Wu F, Wang X, Du H, Wang X, Zhang H. 2013. The two C. elegans ATG-16 homologs have partially redundant functions in the basal autophagy pathway. Autophagy. 9(12):1965–1974. doi: 10.4161/auto.26095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Yan L, Zhou Z, Yang P, Tian E, Zhang K, Zhao Y, Li Z, Song B, Han J, et al. 2009. SEPA-1 mediates the specific recognition and degradation of P granule components by autophagy in C. elegans. Cell. 136(2):308–321. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P, Zhang H. 2013. Autophagy modulates miRNA-mediated gene silencing and selectively degrades AIN-1/GW182 in C. elegans. EMBO Rep. 14(6):568–576. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao YG, Chen Y, Miao G, Zhao H, Qu W, Li D, Wang Z, Liu N, Li L, Chen S, et al. 2017. The ER-localized transmembrane protein EPG-3/VMP1 regulates SERCA activity to control ER-isolation membrane contacts for autophagosome formation. Mol Cell. 67(6):974–989.e976. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao YG, Codogno P, Zhang H. 2021. Machinery, regulation and pathophysiological implications of autophagosome maturation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 22(11):733–750. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00392-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao YG, Liu N, Miao G, Chen Y, Zhao H, Zhang H. 2018. The ER contact proteins VAPA/B interact with multiple autophagy proteins to modulate autophagosome biogenesis. Curr Biol. 28(8):1234–1245.e1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao YG, Zhang H. 2019a. Autophagosome maturation: an epic journey from the ER to lysosomes. J Cell Biol. 218(3):757–770. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201810099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao YG, Zhang H. 2019b. Core autophagy genes and human diseases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 61:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhen Y, Spangenberg H, Munson MJ, Brech A, Schink KO, Tan K-W, Sørensen V, Wenzel EM, Radulovic M, Engedal N, et al. 2020. ESCRT-mediated phagophore sealing during mitophagy. Autophagy. 16(5):826–841. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1639301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Q, Chen Y, Chen D, Zhao H, Feng Y, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Zhang H. 2022. Calcium transients on the ER surface trigger liquid-liquid phase separation of FIP200 to specify autophagosome initiation sites. Cell. 185(22):4082–4098.e4022. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J-X, Li Y, Ding Y-H, Liu J-J, Zhang M-J, Dong M-Q, Wang H-W, Yu L. 2017. Architecture of the ATG2B-WDR45 complex and an aromatic Y/HF motif crucial for complex formation. Autophagy. 13(11):1870–1883. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1359381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng H, Peng K, Gou X, Ju C, Zhang H. 2023. RNA recruitment switches the fate of protein condensates from autophagic degradation to accumulation. J Cell Biol. 222(6):e202210104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202210104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Q, Li H, Li H, Nakagawa A, Lin JLJ, Lee E-S, Harry BL, Skeen-Gaar RR, Suehiro Y, William D, et al. 2016. Mitochondrial endonuclease G mediates breakdown of paternal mitochondria upon fertilization. Science. 353(6297):394–399. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou C, Ma K, Gao R, Mu C, Chen L, Liu Q, Luo Q, Feng D, Zhu Y, Chen Q. 2017. Regulation of mATG9 trafficking by Src- and ULK1-mediated phosphorylation in basal and starvation-induced autophagy. Cell Res. 27(2):184–201. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Y, Wang X, Song M, He Z, Cui G, Peng G, Dieterich C, Antebi A, Jing N, Shen Y. 2019. A secreted microRNA disrupts autophagy in distinct tissues of Caenorhabditis elegans upon ageing. Nat Commun. 10(1):4827. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12821-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou B, Zhang Y, Li S, Wu L, Fejes-Toth G, Naray-Fejes-Toth A, Soukas AA. 2021. Serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase drives hepatic insulin resistance by directly inhibiting AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Rep. 37(1):109785. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang JJ, Hunter CP. 2011. Tissue specificity of Caenorhabditis elegans enhanced RNA interference mutants. GENETICS. 188(1):235–237. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.127209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou CG, Ma YC, Dai LL, Zhang KQ. 2014. Autophagy protects C. elegans against necrosis during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(34):12480–12485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405032111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou L, Wu D, Zang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Chen D. 2019. Construction of a germline-specific RNAi tool in C. elegans. Sci Rep. 9(1):2354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38950-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







