Abstract
This cohort study evaluated the association between medical debt among US adults and forgoing mental health care due to cost in the subsequent year.
Introduction
Affordability remains one of the biggest challenges in US health care, with a growing burden of medical debt.1,2 Medical debt reflects prior health care engagement but may also influence care-seeking behavior. Fewer than half of adults with any mental disorder receive care,3 and medical debt may exacerbate this treatment gap.4 This study evaluated the association between medical debt and forgone mental health care due to cost in the subsequent year.
Methods
A nationally representative cohort of US adults was surveyed in 2023 through 2024 through the COVID-19 Life Stressors Impact on Mental Health and Well-Being (CLIMB) study.5 Of the 7802 adults invited to participate, 2479 (31.8%) responded in 2023, of whom 2020 (81.5%) participated in 2024. For the present cohort study, we limited the sample to 1821 respondents with no missing data for the primary exposure (medical debt) and outcome (forgone mental health care due to cost) and used multiple imputation by chained equations for missing covariates (n = 100), generating 20 imputed datasets. This study was deemed exempt from review by the Johns Hopkins institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent because it was not human participant research. We performed analyses using R, version 4.3.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing) and followed the STROBE guideline.
We fit survey-weighted logistic regression models estimating forgone mental health care as a function of medical debt, first modeling debt as a dichotomous exposure (none vs any), then as a categorical measure, and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. To account for the temporality of the exposure and outcome, we used medical debt reported in 2023 and forgone mental health care in 2024. We reported results with unweighted frequencies, weighted percentages, and average marginal effects (eMethods in Supplement 1).
Results
Among 1821 adults (mean [SD] age, 51.6 [16.7] years; 805 female [50.5% weighted]), 276 (15.3% weighted) reported medical debt in 2023. Forgone mental health care was significantly higher among adults with past-year medical debt (33.8% vs 6.3% weighted). Any medical debt was associated with an increase of 17.3 (95% CI, 11.8-22.8) percentage points in the probability of forgone mental health care due to cost, with an increase in the probability of unmet mental health care needs with increasing medical debt (Table).
Table. Probability of Forgone Mental Health Care Due to Cost Among US Adults in 2024.
| Medical debt | Adults, unweighted No. | Prevalence of forgoing mental health care due to cost, weighted % (95% CI) | Average marginal effect, percentage points (95% CI)a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model | P valueb | Adjusted modela | P valueb | |||
| No | 1545 | 6.3 (5.2-8.0) | 0 [Reference] | NA | 0 [Reference] | NA |
| Yes | 276 | 33.8 (27.8-40.0) | 27.5 (21.0-33.9) | <.001 | 17.3 (11.8-22.8) | <.001 |
| Amount, $ | ||||||
| <1000 | 121 | 28.9 (18.6-42.0) | 22.6 (11.1-34.1) | <.001 | 11.7 (4.4-19.0) | .002 |
| 1000-4999 | 107 | 33.1 (24.9-43.0) | 26.8 (18.4-35.3) | <.001 | 17.6 (10.4-24.7) | <.001 |
| ≥5000 | 48 | 46.3 (29.7-64.0) | 40.0 (24.4-55.6) | <.001 | 28.1 (15.6-40.6) | <.001 |
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Model was adjusted for participant sex, age, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, employment, annual household income, household savings, household size, geographic division of residence, and metropolitan statistical area of residence.
The threshold for statistical significance was P < .05.
Discussion
More than 1 in 7 adults reported carrying medical debt in 2023, of whom 1 in 3 forwent mental health care in the subsequent year. Medical debt may exacerbate the treatment gap4 by potentially (1) raising the threshold for seeking care, (2) eroding patient trust in the health system, or (3) being denied care due to outstanding debts.
This study has several limitations. We cannot draw causal inferences, and our primary exposure was self-reported, making it subject to recall bias. While prevalence estimates of medical debt align with prior studies,4 respondents may underestimate debt amount due to surprise billing, lapses in insurance, or interest fees.2 However, perceived medical debt may affect care-seeking behavior to a greater extent than actual debt. Additionally, despite using survey weights to account for sampling probabilities and nonresponse, there is still potential for nonresponse bias in our prevalence estimates. We found some evidence that medical debt amount may modify the association with forgone care, but CIs were overlapping, likely due to limited statistical power. Further research should consider longer time horizons and evaluate how both insurance and debt amount may modify the association between medical debt and forgone mental health care.
While there are a constellation of factors leading to unmet needs for mental health care,3 medical debt is an iatrogenic problem that leaves patients grappling with the decision to pay large out-of-pocket costs, accumulate medical debt, or forgo needed care.6 Several policy efforts to address medical debt are underway, and there remains an urgent need to understand how these interventions protect against medical debt and if such protections can aid in addressing unmet needs for mental health care.
eMethods
Data Sharing Statement
References
- 1.Howard H, Buddenbaum L. The growing policy wave of medical debt cancellation: states taking action. Health Affairs Forefront. May 16, 2024. Accessed February 24, 2025. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/growing-policy-wave-medical-debt-cancellation-states-taking-action
- 2.Messac L. Your Money or Your Life. Oxford University Press; 2024, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197676639.001.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Presskreischer R, Barry CL, Lawrence AK, McCourt A, Mojtabai R, McGinty EE. Factors affecting state-level enforcement of the federal mental health parity and addiction equity act: a cross-case analysis of four states. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023;48(1):1-34. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10171062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moon KJ, Linton SL, Mojtabai R. Medical debt and the mental health treatment gap among US adults. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(10):985-992. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ettman CK, Cohen GH, Abdalla SM, et al. Persistent depressive symptoms during COVID-19: a national, population-representative, longitudinal study of U.S. adults. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bernard DM, Selden TM, Fang Z. The joint distribution of high out-of-pocket burdens, medical debt, and financial barriers to needed care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023;42(11):1517-1526. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eMethods
Data Sharing Statement
