Skip to main content
Bioinformation logoLink to Bioinformation
. 2025 Jan 31;21(1):62–65. doi: 10.6026/973206300210062

Impact of orthodontic treatment on oral microbiome diversity and composition: A longitudinal study

Mohammad Khursheed Alam 1,2,3,*, Mohammad Younis Hajeer 4,*, M Alfaleh Muhanna Abdulrahim 1,*, Z Alfaleh Ayman Falah 1,*, F Alanazi Abdulmohsen Abdulkarim 1,*
PMCID: PMC12008784  PMID: 40255304

Abstract

The change in oral microbiome diversity and composition during fixed orthodontic treatment was done using 16S rRNA sequencing. Saliva and plaque samples from 60 participants were analyzed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Alpha diversity significantly decreased at 3 months (mean: 2.8 ± 0.4) but partially recovered by 6 months (mean: 3.0 ± 0.3). Beta diversity analysis revealed significant microbial composition shifts (p < 0.01) with an increase in Streptococcus mutans and a decline in Streptococcus sanguinis. Hence, orthodontic treatment alters the oral microbiome, emphasizing the need for enhanced oral hygiene to prevent dysbiosis.

Keywords: Orthodontic treatment, oral microbiome, diversity, microbial composition, fixed appliances, longitudinal study

Background:

The human oral cavity harbors a highly diverse and complex microbiome, consisting of over 700 species of bacteria, fungi, viruses and archaea, which play a pivotal role in maintaining oral and systemic health [1]. Dysregulation has been linked to a wide range of oral diseases, including dental caries, periodontal disease and systemic conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes [2]. Orthodontic treatment, particularly with fixed appliances, is a well-established therapeutic modality for correcting malocclusion and improving dental aesthetics and function. However, the introduction of fixed orthodontic appliances significantly alters the oral environment, creating new niches that favor microbial colonization and biofilm formation [3]. Fixed orthodontic appliances increase the complexity of oral hygiene due to the presence of brackets, wires and bands, which provide retention sites for biofilm accumulation and disrupt the natural clearance of microorganisms by saliva and oral hygiene practices [4]. This alteration may predispose individuals to an increased risk of enamel demineralization, gingivitis and periodontal disease during the course of treatment [5]. The resulting changes in the oral microbiome are characterized by a shift from a symbiotic to a dysbiotic state, marked by an increase in acidogenic and cariogenic bacterial species such as Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp [6]. Emerging studies utilizing high-throughput sequencing methods, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing, have provided valuable insights into the composition and diversity of the oral microbiome during orthodontic treatment. These techniques allow for the identification of both cultivable and non-cultivable microorganisms, enabling a comprehensive understanding of microbial dynamics over time [7]. However, there remains a paucity of longitudinal studies exploring the temporal effects of orthodontic treatment on oral microbiome diversity and composition, especially in diverse populations. Understanding these changes is critical for developing targeted interventions to mitigate adverse effects associated with microbial dysbiosis during orthodontic therapy. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the longitudinal impact of fixed orthodontic treatment on the diversity and composition of the oral microbiome using advanced sequencing techniques, contributing to the existing body of knowledge in this area and informing better clinical practices.

Materials and Methods:

This longitudinal study included 60 participants, aged 12-18 years, undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment at a tertiary dental care center. Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional ethics committee and informed consent was secured from all participants and their guardians. Individuals with systemic conditions, ongoing antibiotic therapy, or a history of periodontal disease were excluded from the study. Saliva and plaque samples were collected at three time points: baseline (prior to appliance placement), 3 months and 6 months after treatment initiation. Samples were collected under standardized conditions using sterile swabs for plaque and expectoration into sterile containers for saliva. All samples were immediately stored at - 80°C until DNA extraction. Microbial DNA was extracted using a commercial DNA extraction kit following the manufacturer's protocol. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using universal bacterial primers and sequencing was performed on a high-throughput Illumina MiSeq platform. The sequencing data were processed using QIIME2 software for quality filtering, chimera removal and taxonomic assignment against the SILVA database. Alpha diversity was assessed using the Shannon and Simpson indices, while beta diversity was analyzed using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software, with significance set at p < 0.05. This methodology enabled the evaluation of temporal changes in oral microbiome diversity and composition associated with orthodontic treatment.

Results:

The study evaluated the impact of fixed orthodontic treatment on oral microbiome diversity and composition over a 6-month period. Changes in alpha and beta diversity, as well as shifts in microbial composition, were observed and are summarized below.

Alpha diversity:

The Shannon Index showed a significant decrease in microbial diversity at 3 months (mean: 2.8 ± 0.4) compared to baseline (mean: 3.2 ± 0.3), followed by partial recovery at 6 months (mean: 3.0 ± 0.3). Similarly, the Simpson Index indicated reduced diversity at 3 months (mean: 0.84 ± 0.05) relative to baseline (mean: 0.88 ± 0.04). The trends for alpha diversity metrics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Changes in alpha diversity metrics over time.

Time Point Shannon Index (Mean ± SD) Simpson Index (Mean ± SD)
Baseline 3.2 ± 0.3 0.88 ± 0.04
3 Months 2.8 ± 0.4 0.84 ± 0.05
6 Months 3.0 ± 0.3 0.86 ± 0.05

Beta diversity:

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity revealed distinct clustering at 3 months, indicating a significant shift in microbial composition compared to baseline (PERMANOVA, p < 0.01). By 6 months, the clustering pattern suggested a partial return towards the baseline state but remained distinct.

Microbial composition:

Relative abundance analysis showed a notable increase in Streptococcus mutans from 18% at baseline to 30% at 3 months, with a slight decrease to 25% at 6 months. In contrast, Streptococcus sanguinis, a commensal species, decreased from 22% at baseline to 15% at 3 months and partially recovered to 18% at 6 months. The relative abundance of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia, associated with periodontal disease, increased during the treatment period. Details of microbial shifts are presented in Table 2. These results underscore significant but reversible changes in oral microbiome diversity and composition during fixed orthodontic treatment.

Table 2. Relative abundance of key microbial species (%).

Species Baseline (%) 3 Months (%) 6 Months (%)
Streptococcus mutans 18 30 25
Streptococcus sanguinis 22 15 18
Porphyromonas gingivalis 5 8 7
Prevotella intermedia 4 7 6

Discussion:

This study highlights the significant impact of fixed orthodontic treatment on the oral microbiome, with noticeable alterations in microbial diversity and composition over a 6-month period. The findings align with previous studies that have demonstrated orthodontic appliances as contributors to microbial dysbiosis by creating niches favorable for biofilm accumulation [1, 2]. These changes have clinical implications, particularly for the risk of enamel demineralization, gingivitis and other oral health issues during orthodontic therapy. The observed reduction in alpha diversity during the initial 3 months of treatment reflects a disruption in the microbial balance, consistent with findings in earlier research [3, 4]. Fixed appliances hinder oral hygiene practices, allowing the proliferation of acidogenic and cariogenic species. Partial recovery of diversity at 6 months suggests microbial adaptation to the new oral environment, which is a key area for further exploration [5]. The beta diversity analysis revealed significant shifts in microbial composition at 3 months, corroborating studies that reported distinct microbial clustering shortly after appliance placement [6, 7]. The increased relative abundance of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. during the early stages of treatment is well-documented, as these species thrive in acidic environments and contribute to enamel demineralization [8, 9]. The partial recovery of Streptococcus sanguinis by the 6-month mark is encouraging, as it indicates the potential for re-establishing microbial equilibrium with proper oral hygiene interventions [10]. Furthermore, the rise in periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia highlights the importance of monitoring periodontal health during orthodontic treatment [11, 12]. The findings emphasize the critical role of stringent oral hygiene practices and regular professional care during orthodontic treatment to mitigate the risk of microbial dysbiosis. Adjunctive strategies such as antimicrobial mouthwashes, probiotic supplementation and improved dietary practices could play a significant role in managing the microbial shifts [13, 14]. Personalized oral hygiene protocols tailored to the individual's microbiome profile may further enhance outcomes during orthodontic therapy. This study was limited by its sample size and single-center design, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study did not account for the potential influence of dietary and behavioral factors on microbial changes. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter studies to validate these findings and explore the long-term effects of orthodontic treatment on the oral microbiome. Investigating the role of advanced interventions, such as microbiome-modulating agents and artificial intelligence-based predictive models, could provide new avenues for improving patient outcomes [15].

Conclusion:

Fixed orthodontic treatment significantly alters oral microbiome diversity and composition, particularly in the early stages of therapy. This data underscore the need for proactive measures to mitigate microbial dysbiosis and maintain oral health during orthodontic treatment.

Edited by Hiroj Bagde

Citation: Alam et al. Bioinformation 21(1):62-65(2025)

Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.

Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.

License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.

Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.

Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.

References


Articles from Bioinformation are provided here courtesy of Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group

RESOURCES