Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. 2024 Aug 9;30(10):2782–2786. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03197-y

Antisense oligonucleotide therapy in an individual with KIF1A-associated neurological disorder

Alban Ziegler 1, Joanne Carroll 1,2, Jennifer M Bain 3, Tristan T Sands 3, Robert J Fee 3, David Uher 4, Cara H Kanner 4, Jacqueline Montes 4, Sarah Glass 5, Julie Douville 5, Laurence Mignon 5, Joseph G Gleeson 5,6,7, Stanley T Crooke 5, Wendy K Chung 1,2,8,9
PMCID: PMC12010239  NIHMSID: NIHMS2063975  PMID: 39122967

Abstract

KIF1A associated neurological disorder (KAND) is a neurodegenerative and often lethal ultra-rare disease with a wide phenotypic spectrum associated with largely heterozygous de novo missense variants in KIF1A. Antisense oligonucleotide therapies represent a promising approach for personalized therapies in ultra-rare diseases. Here we report the case of one patient with a severe form of KAND characterized by refractory spells of behavioral arrest and carrying a p.Pro305Leu variant in KIF1A who was treated with intrathecal injections of an allele specific antisense oligonucleotide specifically designed to degrade the mRNA from the pathogenic allele. The first intrathecal administration was complicated by an epidural cerebrospinal fluid collection, which resolved spontaneously. Otherwise, the antisense oligonucleotide was safe and well tolerated over the 9 month treatment. Most outcome measures including severity of the spells of behavioral arrest, number of falls, and quality of life improved. There was little change in the 6-minute walk test distance, but qualitative changes in gait resulting in meaningful reductions in falls and increasing independence were observed. Cognitive performance was stable and did not degenerate over time.

Our findings provide preliminary insights on the safety and efficacy of an allele specific antisense oligonucleotide as a possible treatment for KAND.

Keywords: KIF1A, Allele-specific oligonucleotide antisense, Targeted treatment, N of 1 treatment, Individualized ASO


Less than 10% of rare diseases have approved treatments1. Within rare diseases there are nano-rare diseases with only 1–30 patients with the same pathogenic variant worldwide 2. The rarity of these diseases often excludes them from drug development programs. While individually rare, these diseases collectively affect more than 263 million individuals worldwide2, and developing strategies to meet the needs of these patients is important3. The treatment reported here was made possible through the collaboration with the non-profit n-Lorem Foundation, which aims to provide experimental antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-based treatments to patients with diseases beyond the reach of traditional commercial drug programs due to their extremely low prevalence2.

A splice modulating antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) treatment has previously been reported as a treatment for a child with Batten disease caused by biallelic loss of function variants in the MFSD8 gene4, highlighting the possibility of ASO-based therapy for personalized treatment. Another splice modulating ASO was also well tolerated in a child with ataxia-telangiectasia5. Allele specific ASO gapmers can be used for allele specific degradation of a transcript encoding a mutant protein without altering the transcript from the wildtype allele and could be a therapeutic approach for diseases due to dominant negative mechanisms6,7.

KIF1A associated neurological disorder (KAND) is a neurodegenerative and often lethal ultra-rare disease that has been associated with largely heterozygous de novo missense variants. The phenotypic features include brain and optic nerve atrophy, refractory epilepsy, cognitive impairment, spasticity, and neuropathy8. Heterozygous variants leading to KIF1A haploinsufficiency are associated only with adult onset hereditary spastic paraplegia without seizures or cognitive impairment, a phenotype significantly milder than that associated with missense variants9 suggesting that gapmer ASO mediated therapy might provide a bridging therapeutic approach for dominant negative missense variants in KIF1A until other treatment options are available.

KIF1A is a neuron-specific homodimeric kinesin involved in the anterograde transport of cargo along axonal microtubules. In mice, Kif1a was shown to be necessary for hippocampal synaptogenesis and learning10. Epilepsy of variable severity is reported in 42% 9 of individuals with KAND and is thought to result from altered synaptic function 11. The p.Pro305Leu variant in KIF1A, identified in only eight individuals worldwide, was shown to act as dominant negative variant able to bind to microtubules but displaying reduced processivity and velocity12.

We report here the use of an allele specific phosphorothioate/phosphodiester (PS/PO) 2′methoxyethyl (MOE) gapmer individualized ASO in a 9 year old girl with KAND.

The participant is a 9 year old female patient previously reported as case 3 by Kaur et al.12. She initially presented with global developmental delay. She has had progressive spasticity of the lower limbs and painful peripheral neuropathy. Her ambulation has deteriorated from being completely independent to frequently falling with multiple bone fractures and requiring a wheelchair.

Prior to ASO treatment, the patient communicated using simple sentences with frequent pauses mid-sentence (Supplementary video).

From 3 years of age, she had spells of behavioral arrest concerning for seizures but without electrographic correlate on EEG. Her EEG recordings have shown diffuse slowing and disorganization in wakefulness and abundant epileptiform activation during sleep with spikes present for 80% of the non-REM sleep recording. The clinical episodes and interictal epileptiform activity were not responsive to medications, including lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, and benzodiazepine therapy.

This patient is heterozygous for a de novo pathogenic c.914C>T (p.Pro305Leu) variant in KIF1A, and we refer to this allele as the ‘pathogenic allele.’ Using long read sequencing for phasing, the c.914C>T variant was found to be in trans with the alternate allele for a common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs7578279) in intron 37 of 48 of KIF1A (NM_001244008.2). We refer to the allele carrying the rs7578279 variant and not carrying the pathogenic c.914C>T variant as the “wildtype”“ allele”.

The drug named nL-KIF1-001 is the 19-sodium salt of a 20-base (20-mer) oligonucleotide that binds the reference sequence in cis with the KIF1A pathogenic variant (Figure 1A). The drug is injected intrathecally and dose-escalation was done in 20 mg increments (Extended data table 1).

Fig. 1 |. ASO design and potency.

Fig. 1 |

a, The pathogenic c.914C>T p.Pro305Leu variant is in trans with a common benign SNP (rs7578279) at position chr2:240737847A–G (hg38). The ASO binds the mRNA from the allele carrying c.914C>T p.Pro305Leu at positions chr2:240737833–240737853 (hg38), which overlaps with the benign SNP on the WT allele. b, Dose–response of nL-KIF1-001 in vitro. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons were treated by free uptake with increasing concentrations of ASO for 5 days. RNA was isolated and KIF1A mRNA was evaluated using quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR) (TaqMan). nL-KIF-001 showed an IC50 of 7.4 μM and high selectivity for the mRNA from the pathogenic allele over WT KIF1A. Each data point was derived from six independent biological replicates where KIF1A expression was normalized to cyclophilin and compared to untreated control. Data from these replicates are expressed as the mean value ± s.d.

The dose response analysis demonstrated an IC50 of 7.4 μM. There was no significant reduction of the mRNA level from the wildtype allele at any concentration tested, highlighting the high selectivity of nL-KIF1-001 for the mRNA from the pathogenic allele over the wildtype allele (Figure 1B)

The first intrathecal administration was complicated by an epidural CSF collection at the injection site causing back pain necessitating an external 4% lidocaine patch, acetaminophen, increased doses of gabapentin for 10 days and leading to inability to walk for 7 days. The patient fully recovered 11 days after ASO administration once the CSF collection resorbed, which was confirmed by repeat MR imaging. Because it was unclear if or how much of this first dose went into the epidural space, the 20 mg dose was repeated one month later.

During the 9-month study, no other adverse events were observed. Clinical signs of increased intracranial pressure were specifically monitored, and none were seen during the treatment. Laboratory tests for safety assessments (Extended data table 1) remained within normal during the study.

The patient is still being treated.

At run-in (the 50 days before first dose), surveys completed by caregivers reported between 100 and 290 spells of behavioral arrest per day in the four months before the first dose, each lasting from 14 to 240 seconds. Events were characterized clinically by behavioral arrest with unresponsive staring, sometimes with eye rolling, and sometimes leaning to the side and falling. While clinical observation strongly suggested epileptic seizures and her interictal EEG demonstrated epileptiform abnormalities indicating a risk for seizures, the events themselves were not accompanied by consistent electrographic changes on EEG. Throughout, the EEG showed generalized slowing. The posterior dominant rhythm (PDR), the hallmark of normal electrocerebral organization in wakefulness, was rarely seen and slow for her age, consistent with diffuse cerebral dysfunction (Extended data Figure 1). At baseline her sleep EEG showed abundant multi-focal spikes with a spike wave index (SWI) of 74% (Figure 2).

Fig. 2 |. Clinical outcomes from 50 days before the first dose to day 360.

Fig. 2 |

The dates of dosing are represented by the dashed red lines. a, Number of spells of behavioral arrest as reported by the parents. b, Duration of the longest spells of behavioral arrest as reported by the parents. c, SWI as determined using overnight EEG. d, Number of falls per day as reported by the parents. e, Distance walked during the 6-min Walk Test. f, QoL determined using the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) scale. Blanks correspond to the absence of data. Because of their high frequency, the parents were unable to accurately count the number of seizures on days 18, 198 and 203.

The daily numbers of spells of behavioral arrest reported by the caregivers dropped after the first dose and is now less than 30 in the week following the most recent dose of 80 mg. In addition to the lower spells of behavioral arrest frequency, the longest was considerably shorter (Figure 2). There were three days (day 18, day 198, and day 203) when the spells of behavioral arrest were too frequent to be counted. After initiating the ASO, the EEG demonstrated improvements with greater organization after the second dose that persisted with a reduction in the frequency of epileptiform spikes (SWI of 36% by day 343, 42 days after the sixth dose) (Figure 2).

At baseline, walking was severely impaired due to spasticity, and parents reported an average of 26.2 falls per day (SD = 19.8) in the four months before the first dose. The rare days without falls prior to dosing corresponded to days when she was in her wheelchair and not ambulating. Improvement in gait was noted in the month following the first dose, and numbers of falls decreased to a maximum of 7 per days with many days without falls (Average = 0.75 and SD = 1.19) (Figure 2) despite an increase in overall activity and ambulation.

There was improvement in quality of speech, with longer sentences, less dysarthric speech and improved prosody and intonation. Her level of attention was improved with faster response time to tasks and improved ability to follow multi-step commands. The motor exam showed improvement in pulling to stand, initially needing assistance and later able to stand up from sitting on the floor with a modified Gower’s. There were improvements in hand tremor amplitude, dysmetria on finger-to-nose testing and ataxia when walking. Spasticity persisted in both lower extremities with progressive scissoring.

There was minimal change in the distance walked during the 6-minute walk test (Figure 2). During the study, we assessed fine motor skills with the nine-hole peg test performed after the fifth dose and sixth dose which showed mild improvement with the dominant hand. However, the assessment was complicated by a lack of participant concentration at one timepoint. The GMFM-66 score also showed mild improvement over the assessment period (56.9 at run-in and 61.2 after fifth dose).

Neurofilament light chain in the CSF was stable over time.

The patient was screened for visual and motor confounds on each subtest of the DAS-II with training trials, and she successfully passed items to proceed with each subtest. Her cognitive performance was generally stable over three time points. Run-in evaluation at day - 158 indicated average verbal abilities (¯X=98), low nonverbal abilities (¯X=77), and very low spatial abilities (¯X=34). Her performance was comparable at day 227 with low end of average verbal abilities (¯X=87), low nonverbal abilities (¯X=74), and very low spatial abilities (¯X=50). Her memory performance was also low (¯X=70, SD=3.78) across time points. Her overall intellectual composite was stable (¯X=65, SD=2.6) (see Extended data Figure 2).

Over the course of treatment, the parents reported an improvement in engagement, connectivity, awareness, speech fluency and complexity, and ability to interact in group activities. There was an increase in the quality of life score from 55.8 at baseline to 77.3 at day 308 (Figure 2). At last evaluation, there were still unmet needs including pain in the feet, difficulty stepping, gastroesophageal reflux, and behavioral outbursts.

Determining the optimal dose and frequency for an ASO in an n of 1 treatment requires a combination of frequent evaluations and objective and subjective assessments to evaluate the efficacy. In this study, the spells of behavioral arrest and fall diaries were used to assess clinical impact. EEGs provided further objective evidence of impact on neurophysiological function, as reflected by improved organization and reduced epileptic irritability.

The ASO did not address all manifestations of KAND. Residual neuropathy suggests that there are still unmet treatment challenges. Completing the seizure and falls diaries is burdensome for caregivers and not all days were captured, particularly when the participant was away from home. For future studies, wearables may reduce this burden. Standardized assessment of spasticity should also be added

The measure of genetic constraint for the KIF1A gene against loss of function variants (pLI of 1) in the general population suggests that KIF1A haploinsufficiency is not without consequence 13. However, people with heterozygous loss of function variants have a much less severe phenotype than missense variants. The current ASO strategy has provided evidence that it is clinically possible to adequately modulate KIF1A leading to substantial improvement in quality of life. It is important to note though that this treatment will not affect all symptoms (i.e., visual symptoms due to optic nerve atrophy) due to the route of administration.

Developing and implementing n of 1 treatments has many challenges, especially the considerable work needed for each case/ASO. While acknowledging the benefits of the FDA guidance documents for individualized ASO 14,15,16,17 to facilitate the discovery and development pathway as well as the IND application, this process still requires significant expertise (such as ASO design, methodology, toxicology, regulation, clinical management). A close partnership with the patients and families is required to set expectations, ensure protocol compliance, and discuss risks and benefits. The n-Lorem Foundation has submitted 12 INDs as of March 15, 2024 for different indications, target organs and including individualized outcome measures specific for each patient. n-Lorem has built the needed infrastructure to support n of 1 programs from ASO discovery to patient treatment, which represents the first large scale effort for patients with nano rare mutations who have no other treatment opportunities.

Our findings support the use of an allele specific ASO as a possible treatment for KAND, and we are planning to treat other patients. Due to the phenotypic variability in this condition by variant and over the lifespan, each patient will require individualized outcome measures tailored to their age, cognitive function, and disease stage including visual impairment. A future goal is to start treatment as early as possible to prevent irreversible damage.

Methods

Ethics

Consent from the parents was given for the treatment and for the publication of the data including the videos of the patient. After informed consent was obtained from the parents and after authorization by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to commence treatment under an Investigator Initiated New Drug Application (IND) protocol (IND 161670), the administration of the ASO was conducted), with concurrence of the Columbia University institutional review board (Protocol AAAS9161).

Design of the drug

ASOs were designed to promote selective degradation of the mutant KIF1A transcript through recruitment of RNase H1 to the RNA-ASO heteroduplex.

The initial screen targeted 77 heterozygous sites in the patient’s KIF1A genomic sequence using 468 gapmer ASOs. The lead ASO was identified from the primary screen for which several ASOs were designed to each polymorphism. The lead ASO was named nL-KIF1-001 and binds the reference sequence in cis with the KIF1A pathogenic variant (Figure 1A). This approach allows for differential binding and reduction of the pre-mRNA from the pathogenic allele, while sparing the pre-mRNA from the reference allele.

nL-KIF1-001 sodium is the 19-sodium salt of a 20-base (20-mer) oligonucleotide. The oligonucleotide general structure is a 5-10-5 2′methoxyethyl (MOE) gapmer and comprises five nucleotides at the 5′ end and five nucleotides at the 3′ end that are modified at the 2′-O of ribose with a MOE group.

The nL-KIF1-001 sodium sequence is written as follows:

5′-AUoGoUoACATTTTCTTTGoUoUGC-3′

The underlined nucleotides contain the MOE modification, and ‘o’ indicates phosphodiester linkages. All other linkages are phosphorothioate. All cytosine bases are modified at the 5 position with a methyl group, as are the uracil bases in the MOE nucleotides. The ten nucleotides in the middle all contain 2′-deoxyribose.

In vitro potency and allele-selectivity were determined following a dose response of nL-KIF1-001 in iPSc-derived neurons from the patient’s fibroblasts using free uptake at concentrations of 0.01, 0.03, 0.16, 0.80, 4.0 and 20.0 μM for 5 (Figure 1B). Expression level from each allele was then measured using tagged probes (“wildtype transcript” tagged in green and “pathogenic transcript” tagged in red). KIF1A mRNA was quantified using quantitative RT-PCR.

Toxicity studies

The potential toxicity of nL-KIF1-001 was assessed in an 8-week single intracerebroventricular (ICV) dose study in mice, an 8-week single intrathecal (IT) dose study in rats, and a good laboratory practices (GLP) compliant 13-week once monthly IT dose study in rats.

As quality control, multiple release tests were performed, including tests for appearance (lyophilized white to off-white cake), identity (within 2 Da of expected mass of 7070.0 Da), identification (synthesis report matches expected sequence), purity (determined as 98.2% pure by high-performance liquid chromatography), moisture content (reported as 0.71%), sodium content (5.75%), bacterial endotoxin (0.032 EU/mg) pH (7.46), bioburden (total aerobic microbial count and total yeasts and mold counts less than 100 CFU/g each).

Selection of appropriate doses

The selection of appropriate clinical doses was based on previous experience in IT ASO clinical trial with 2′-MOE mixed backbone gapmer. A starting dose of 20 mg for this patient was proposed based on the similarity of potency of this ASO to others evaluated at this pediatric age, in this chemical class, using this design and route of administration, in addition to the severity of the patient’s condition. Dose-escalation was done in 20 mg increments, at the physician’s discretion.

More than 10,000 patients have been treated with PS 2′-MOE ASOs in clinical trials and commercially. After intrathecal administration PS 2′-MOE ASOs distribute broadly throughout the spinal cord and central nervous system and have been shown to be pharmacologically active broadly. To date, intrathecally administered mixed PS/PO backbone 2′-MOE ASOs have been generally well-tolerated and safe over a range of doses (10-120 mg) and schedules (monthly, every-other-month, and quarterly). Drug-related adverse events have been limited with transient radiculopathy that was self-limited being observed most frequently when HTT-Rx was administered monthly at 120 mg and reduced in incidence with an every-other month dosing. Other adverse events that have been noted that may be drug related included an increase in CSF protein levels. It is important to note that PS 2′MOE ASOs differ substantially in their potential toxicities compared to PS 2′LNA ASOs which have been associated with adverse events after intrathecal administration.

Manufacturing of nL-KIF1-001

nL-KIF1-001 was manufactured by ChemGenes Corporation according to good manufacturing practices (GMP). nL-KIF1-001 was reconstituted in Elliott’s B Solution and filtered through a 0.22 μm polyvinyldene fluoride membrane by the Columbia research pharmacy at concentrations required to meet dose level requirements. The dose was administered in a volume of 10 to 14 mL. Prior to dosing, the formulated nL-KIF1-001 was kept at room temperature for no longer than 4 hours.

Design of the study

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nL-KIF1-001. The n-of-1 open-label study was designed as a dose-escalation study, to start at 20 mg increasing incrementally by 20 mg, up to a potential maximum dose of 80 mg (Extended data table 1).

Clinical efficacy was measured via a battery of parent-reported outcomes and clinical measures. The parents were asked to report the number of falls, number of spells of behavioral arrest, and the length of the longest spells of behavioral arrest in a daily diary. Standardized motor evaluations (6-minute walk test), clinical neurologic exams, Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) scale and overnight EEGs were obtained at baseline and between each dosing. The 6-minute wak test measures how far a person can walk in 6 minutes, higher score correlates with higher function. The Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) scale is a 32 item Likert scale specifically developed to asses the quality of life of children with intellectual disability. This 100 points scale focus on the following 6 domains: physical health, positive emotions, negative emotions, social interaction, leisure and the outdoors, and independence. Higher scores correlate with a better quality of life. The Differential Abilities Scales-Second edition (DAS-II) is a measure of general cognitive abilities and was performed at baseline and day 225.

Primary endpoint was a change in frequency of spells of behavioral arrest compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were:

  • change in mobility using the 6 minute walk test

  • average number of falls each day over time

The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment. No compensation was provided to the patient and her family.

The ASO was administered via intrathecal injection under sedation. From the baseline to last dose of ASO, the antiepileptic medical treatment was unchanged. Assessment of safety is detailed in Extended data table 2 and supplementary table 1.

Clinical data were gathered in a dedicated REDCAP server (version 13.4.2).

Extended Data

Extended Data Fig. 1 |. Run-in and post-treatment electroencephalography.

Extended Data Fig. 1 |

Run-in (a, c) and post-treatment (b, d) electroencephalography (EEG). Awake EEG (a, b) shows diffuse slowing and excess beta frequency activity related to benzodiazepine therapy. A posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) of 9 Hz is appreciated (arrow) in B, recorded after the third dose. Sleep EEG (c, d) shows abundant spikes (arrowheads) in the temporal and parietal regions at the onset of sleep. A modest improvement in spike incidence is shown in D, recorded after the second dose.

Extended Data Fig. 2 |. Cognitive performance over the course of the study.

Extended Data Fig. 2 |

Cognitive performance over the course of the study as evaluated by the differential ability scales-second edition (DAS-II).

Extended data table 1).

Actual dosing regimen and dose escalation

Dose Day Injected volume Notes
20mg 0 15 Large epidural collection at the site of injection. Dose effectively delivered to the central nervous system is thought to be low.
20mg 30 10
40mg 58 10
60 mg 115 14
60 mg 207 14
80 mg 301 14

Extended Data Table 2 |.

Clinical laboratory tests for safety assessments

Serum Chemistry Hematology Urinalysis Cerebrospinal fluid analysis
Albumin
Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Calcium
Bicarbonate
Chloride
Creatinine
Glucose
Magnesium Phosphate
Potassium Sodium
Total Bilirubin
Total Protein Alanine
Aminotransferase (ALT)
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
Creatinine Clearance
Hematocrit (Hct)
Hemoglobin (Hgb)
Red Blood Cell Count (RBC)
White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
WBC differential Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)
Platelets
Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH)
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Color
Clarity/turbidity
pH
Specific gravity
Glucose
Ketones
Nitrites
Leukocyte esterase
Bilirubin
Urobilinogen
Blood
Protein
RBCs
WBCs
Cell count
Total protein
Glucose

Supplementary Material

supp table 1
supp video 1
Download video file (27.1MB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

Funding from the study was provided by NINDSR01NS114636 and UL1TR001873. These funders had no involvement in study design or in the data collection, management, analysis or interpretation. We thank the patient and her family for their participation and partnership. We thank Jane Cho, Angela Gregory, Tracy Cole, Andy Watt, Joseph Ochaba, and Frank Bennett for their expertise and advice. We also thank the Division of Regulatory Operations for Neuroscience at the Food and Drug Administration for their guidance.

Footnotes

Competing interests

Wendy Chung is on the Board of Directors at Prime Medicine and Rallybio. Other authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Data availability statement

To protect the privacy of the patient included in this n of 1 treatment, the phenotypic data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (wendy.chung@childrens.harvard.edu) within a month on request and completion of a data transfer agreement.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supp table 1
supp video 1
Download video file (27.1MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

To protect the privacy of the patient included in this n of 1 treatment, the phenotypic data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (wendy.chung@childrens.harvard.edu) within a month on request and completion of a data transfer agreement.

RESOURCES