Abstract
In Muslim societies, issues related to sexual and reproductive health are rarely discussed and considered sensitive subjects. This study was conducted to assess the acceptability and effectiveness of a sexual health education program in Turkey, a Muslim country. The study was conducted using a one-group quasi-experimental design. The sexual health education program consisted of five sessions of sexual health education, pre-test, post-test, first follow-up (30 days after) and second follow-up (60 days after). The sample of the study consisted of 207 female and 79 male first year Muslim university students. At the end of the program, 96.5% of the Muslim university students stated that they liked the education, 96.2% found the education useful, 86.0% found the online education convenient, and 96.9% would use the information they learned. Muslim university students, in general, found the feasibility of the education to be highly favorable. It was determined that the post-test score of sexual health knowledge was higher than the pre-test score (p < 0.05). The program in this study was found to be adopted by Muslim university students and it is thought to be valuable in societies with similar religious beliefs and views.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10508-025-03111-8.
Keywords: Sexual health, Sexual behavior, Sexual health education program, Muslim university students
Introduction
Sustainable development goals and global health agendas recognize sexual health education as an important entry point for promoting adolescent health both as an end in itself and as a means of improving the overall health and well-being of young people. Cultural and religious factors play a crucial role influencing sexual health perceptions, sexual health knowledge and needs. For example, issues related to sexual and reproductive health are rarely discussed in Muslim societies and are considered sensitive subjects (Shirpak et al., 2008). Although Islam allows for the teaching or provision of safer sex information to individuals as a health promotion strategy, they do not appear to receive standardized education (Rosenfield, 1997; Shaw & El-Bassel, 2014). The world has long recognized the significance of sexuality education, and countries have made attempts at increasing public awareness by integrating it into their educational curricula. However, sexuality education remains an extremely controversial topic when policies and practices are largely dictated by traditional and cultural beliefs (Shaikh & Ochani, 2018). Therefore, Muslim young adults are compelled to resort to sources which might be of questionable authenticity, accuracy and appropriateness (Adamczyk & Hayes, 2012). However, their doubtful reliability makes young people susceptible to exploitation, harm and misinformation (Iqbal et al., 2017).
Islam has highly valued children's rights, particularly to education and health, and recognizes education regarding sexual matters as a crucial part of every child's upbringing. According to the Islamic faith, the ideal young Muslim is predominantly conceptualized as someone who undergoes an asexual transition from birth to puberty and remains sexually abstinent after puberty until marriage (Tabatabaie, 2015). Such a problematic position of childhood and adolescent sexuality in an Islamic perspective, as Tabatabaie (2015) notes, necessitates controlling and, more importantly, preventing childhood and adolescent sexualities in Muslim societies. For any educational intervention to work, it should be tailored to meet the target population’s specific needs. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education emphasizes the need for sexual health education programs that are scientifically accurate, incremental in nature with a spiral curriculum approach, age-appropriate, and, most importantly, culturally and contextually relevant (UNESCO, 2018). There are two types of sexual health education adopted in the world: (1) sexual abstinence and (2) comprehensive sexual health education (Fields et al., 2015). The sexual abstinence education aiming to delay sexual intercourse until marriage is based on the lack of sexual experience of young individuals, and this education tends to be supported in contexts where religious beliefs are stronger and non-procreative sexual practices and partnerships are censured (Lemon, 2019; Miller, 2019). But it is important to note that the assumption that Muslim young adults are not sexually active is incorrect and leads to a failure to address their sexual health needs. Comprehensive sexual health education, on the other hand, explains to young individuals the benefits of delaying sexuality until they are emotionally and physically ready instead of giving the message of “avoiding sexual intercourse until marriage.” It also teaches young individuals how to protect themselves from infections and unwanted pregnancy when they decide to have sexual intercourse (AVERT, 2014). Therefore, it strengthens the argument that comprehensive sexual health education can assist Muslims young to abide by the religious ideal of premarital abstinence, rather than encouraging them to have premarital sex.
It is necessary to design sexual education programs that are religiously appropriate and accepted in Muslim societies. Muslim understandings of sexuality education remain largely obscure in both public and academic spheres because they are often ignored (Sanjakdar & Yip, 2017). Since sexual health is not taught in any formal setting in most Muslim countries, there is a need for new models of education, especially comprehensive sexual health education. This is because the lack of comprehensive sex education for Muslim young adults increases both the risks that they will have unsafe sex and the likelihood that they will make the decision to have premarital sex without being adequately informed of the possible consequences, and this information is essential to maintaining sexual health once they are married. A review of the literature reveals that sexual health education programs have been conducted in Muslim countries such as Iran, Ethiopia and Kenya (Fasil et al., 2022; Gaughran & Asgary, 2014; Mahmodi & Valiee, 2016). However, there appears to be no effective and acceptable sexual health education program for both male and female university students in Muslim countries. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to design a sexual health education program in a Muslim countries and to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of this program.
Method
Participants
In this study, 483 male and female students studying in the first year of a university in Turkey, a Muslim country, were invited. No sample selection was made, and it was aimed at reaching all first year students of the university. Since the study was voluntary, 197 students did not participate in the study because it was related to sexual health education, they did not have enough time, and other reasons. As a result, this study was completed with 286 female (n = 207) and male (n = 79) students.
Before the study began, its purpose was explained to the participants, and participants’ consent was obtained. Participants were also informed that they could exit the study at any time. Participants gave consent after being informed in the online questionnaire and voluntarily participated in the study and answered the questionnaire. No compensation was offered as an incentive to take the survey.
Procedure
This study was conducted between October and December 2020. The sexual health education program consisted of pre-test (pre-education), education initiative, post-test (post-education), first follow-up (30 days later) and second follow-up (60 days later). The flowchart of the study is given in Fig. 1. The sexual health education program was conducted in five online sessions on 5 consecutive days. The duration of each online session was different. The intervention content of the program is given in Table 1. The comprehensive sexual health education was provided in the sessions, and training topics were created in line with the literature (Latifnejad Roudsari et al., 2013; Sexuality Information and Education Council, 2009; Weaver et al., 2005). This program focuses on the right of Muslim young adults to receive comprehensive sex education that is religiously appropriate. The program was preferred to be an online program in terms of reaching a large number of Muslim young adults (Widman et al., 2020), protecting the sense of privacy, effective in reducing students' risky sexual behaviors (Kamke et al., 2020), easy access (Smith & Anderson, 2018) and low cost of education (Hall et al., 2016). Since all conversations about sexuality with Muslim university students must be within the context of Haya (sensitization of the heart and anguish when events that are contrary to decency occur) and to preserve this modesty, single-sex classes for sexuality education programs are preferred, as are classes taught by a teacher of the same sex (Ashraf, 1998), the education was given by the female educator to the female group and by the male educator to the male group via Zoom application. Zoom, a web-based application that provides quality audio, video and screen sharing, has created an interactive learning environment with features that enable them to record the education, watch them later and ask questions during the education.
Fig. 1.
Process of study
Table 1.
Content of the sexual health education program
| Session topics | Aim | Intervention content | Number of participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Session | |||
| Physiology and anatomy of reproduction | Increasing the level of knowledge about female and male reproductive health | Message: How does sexual health affect overall health? | 228 active |
| The importance of reproductive health | Understanding the effect of reproductive health on general health | 30 min PowerPoint presentation (lecture, question–answer and discussion) | 58 from records |
| 2. Session | |||
| Sexual development and lifelong sexuality | Increasing the level of knowledge about physical, sexual and psychosocial development stages | Message: Couples in romantic relationships can express their feelings to each other even without sexual intercourse (holding hands, hugging, expressing love in saying and explaining their feelings in writing) | 238 active |
| Love/dating | Raising awareness about healthy relationships | 45 min PowerPoint presentation (lecture, question–answer and discussion) | 48 from records |
| Healthy romantic relationships | |||
| 3. Session | |||
| Sexual behavior | Learning to live sexuality happily and safely, and gaining the necessary responsibilities | Message: Learning and adopting protective sexual behavior is important to maintaining sexual health | 236 active |
| Protection methods | 60 min PowerPoint presentation (lecture, question–answer and discussion) | 50 from records | |
| STD and AIDS/HIV | |||
| 4. Session | |||
| Myths about sexuality | Recognizing false beliefs about sexuality and gaining correct knowledge | Message: Sexual life should be free from coercion and exploitation | 230 Active |
| Sexual abuse and sexual violence | 45 min PowerPoint presentation (lecture, question–answer and discussion) | 56 from records | |
| 5. Session | |||
| Decision-making skills | To be able to make the right decisions for a healthy sexual life and to learn personal hygiene methods in protecting sexual health | Message: Sexual decisions can affect an individual's future health and life plans | 232 active |
| Personal hygiene and self-care | 45 min PowerPoint presentation (lecture, question–answer and discussion) | 54 from records | |
The sexual health education program was announced to the students through the social media groups of the university they were affiliated with. A WhatsApp group was created for students who gave consent to participate in this program. Before the session, short messages were sent via social media to increase participation. Computerized surveys were used before, after and during the follow-up.
Measures
This study’s online survey consisted of three parts: (1) the sociodemographic form, (2) the Sexual Health Knowledge Test and (3) the Acceptability and Feasibility Survey. The data were collected via self-reports, and the survey took approximately 10 min to complete. The data were collected through an online questionnaire application.
Sociodemographic Form
This form consisted of 16 questions about individual characteristics (such as age, gender, marital status and sexual identity), opinion on premarital sexual experience, risky sexual behaviors (such as sexual behaviors, status of protection during sexual intercourse, status of STD testing and alcohol-induced sexual intercourse) and sexual abstinence (such as “are you sexually active? and have you ever had sexual intercourse that resulted in sexual intercourse?”).
Sexual Health Knowledge Test (SHKT)
It consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions covering sexual universal values, sexual identity development, sexual orientations, sex–gender, anatomy of reproductive system, sexual relationship/satisfaction, reproductive physiology, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, sexual violence and safe sexual behavior to determine students' knowledge about sexual and reproductive health (Evcili & Golbasi, 2017a, 2017b, 2019). For example, the universal values sub-dimensions: “Which of the following is not one of the universal values related to sexuality? a. Sexuality is unique to all human beings, b. Sexuality is a natural and healthy part of life, c. Every decision related to sexual life has effects and consequences, d. Sexual intercourse is the only way to express sexuality, e. Starting sexual behavior early brings risks.” The correct answer is d, etc. Each question has one correct answer. Each correctly responded item was given 1 point. Items not responded or responded incorrectly were given 0 points. The lowest and highest possible scores to be obtained from the test were 0 and 40, respectively. The higher the score, the higher the possibility of having sexual health knowledge. The widely used Item Discrimination Index reports the difference between the proportions of high and low scorers answering a dichotomous item correctly. High values are reputed to flag good items, low values bad. As a general rule, point-biserial values of 0.20 and above are considered to be desirable. As a result of the analyses, the final test consisting of 40 questions was obtained. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the 40 questions in the study was calculated as 0.88. The internal consistency of the scale was highly reliable. In this study, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.80.
Acceptability and Feasibility Survey
The program acceptability and feasibility questionnaire (Bauermeister et al., 2015; Widman et al., 2020) prepared in line with the literature was administered at the end of the education. The questionnaire consists of four questions evaluating the acceptability and nine questions evaluating the feasibility (four questions evaluating the content of the education and five questions evaluating the educators). It is a 5-point Likert type, ranging between strongly agree and strongly disagree.
Statistical Analyses
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 26.0 (SPSS) was used to analyze the data obtained from this study. Normality of the distribution of the data was evaluated with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, which determined that the data were not normally distributed (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2021). Since the data did not demonstrate normal distribution, non-parametric tests were employed. Sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated using mean, standard deviation, frequency (n) and percentage distributions (%). The feasibility and acceptability of the program questionnaires were evaluated with frequency (n), percentage distributions (%) and chi-square. In the comparison of the pre-test, post-test, first follow-up and second follow-up values and differences of the questionnaires, the data were analyzed using the marginal homogeneity test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test with repeated measures and Friedman test were also used. The pre-test and post-test comparison for participants' sexual behavior was compared using the marginal homogeneity test for categorical data. The comparisons of average Sexual Health Knowledge and its sub-dimensions scores on the pre-test/post-test/follow-up were assessed with the Friedman test; the pre-test/post-test/follow-up test comparisons were assessed with the Friedman test. The Wilcoxon test was used in the evaluation of matched pairs. Using the bootstrapping (5.000 bootstrap samples) method, the confidence interval was determined to be 95%. Interpretation of the analysis resulted in an acceptable statistical significance level of p < 0.05.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 20.04 ± 2.66 years, and 72.4% were females. It was determined that 21.0% of the participants (48.1% of males and 10.6% of females) had sexual intercourse, and the age of first sexual experience was 18.66 ± 2.56 (min = 14 and max = 24). About 58.4% of them stated that they did not receive sexual health education. Participants are described in Table 2.
Table 2.
General and sexual health-related characteristics
| Variables | Min.–Max | M ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (n = 286) | 17–24 | 20.04 ± 2.66 |
| Age of first sexual experience (n = 286) | 14–24 | 18.66 ± 2.56 |
| Female (n = 207) | 14–24 | 19.13 ± 2.31 |
| Male (n = 79) | 14–24 | 18.39 ± 2.68 |
| n | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Female | 207 | 72.4 |
| Male | 79 | 27.6 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 276 | 96.5 |
| Married | 10 | 3.5 |
| Gender identity | ||
| Heterosexual | 260 | 90.9 |
| Gay–Lesbian | 2 | 0.7 |
| Bisexual | 2 | 0.7 |
| Other | 21 | 7.3 |
| Not sure | 1 | 0.3 |
| Having sexual health education | ||
| Yes | 119 | 41.6 |
| No | 167 | 58.4 |
| Sexual experience | ||
| Yes | 60 | 21.0 |
| No | 226 | 79.0 |
| First sexual experience (n = 60) | ||
| Primary–secondary school | 2 | 3.3 |
| High school | 36 | 60.0 |
| College | 14 | 23.3 |
| I am married–I did not have sexual intercourse before marriage | 8 | 13.3 |
| Number of sexual partners in college (n = 60) | ||
| None | 34 | 56.7 |
| 1 | 15 | 25.0 |
| 2–4 | 7 | 11.7 |
| 5–10 | 4 | 6.7 |
| Prevention methods (n = 60) | ||
| Long-acting method | 2 | 3.3 |
| Contraceptive pill | 2 | 3.3 |
| Condom | 30 | 50.0 |
| Morning-after pill | 8 | 13.3 |
| Withdrawal | 18 | 30.0 |
Min: minimum, Max: maximum, M: mean and Sd: standard deviation
While the rate of sexual abstinence of the participants before the education was 63.3%, this rate was found to be 88.3% at the end of the education (p < 0.05). It was determined that the rate of having STD tests was 10% before the education and increased to 30% at the end of the education. The diagnosis increased from 1.7% to 11.7%, respectively (p < 0.05). While the rate of alcohol-induced sexual intercourse was 33.3% before the education, this rate decreased to 6.7% at the end of the education (p < 0.05). While 32.5% of the participants answered “I am completely against the premarital sexual experience of the woman” before the education, this rate increased to 53.5% at the end of the education. While 29.7% of the participants were completely against the premarital sexual experience of males before the education, this ratio increased to 49.7% at the end of the education (Table 3).
Table 3.
Comparison of pre-test and post-test for sexual behaviors of the participants (N = 286)
| Variables | Pre-testª | Post-testb | Test and p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | χ2 | p | |
| Opinion on premarital sexual experience of a female | ||||||
| I’m strongly against it | 93 | 32.5 | 153 | 53.5 | 6.63* | < .001 |
| I perceive it as normal | 130 | 45.5 | 114 | 39.9 | ||
| Undecided | 63 | 22.0 | 19 | 6.6 | ||
| Opinion on premarital sexual experience of a male | ||||||
| I’m strongly against it | 85 | 29.7 | 142 | 49.7 | 6.41* | < .001 |
| I perceive it as normal | 140 | 49.0 | 123 | 43.0 | ||
| Undecided | 61 | 21.3 | 21 | 7.3 | ||
| Protection in sexual intercourse | ||||||
| Yes | 38 | 63.3 | 38 | 88.3 | 3.08* | < .001 |
| No | 12 | 20.0 | 1 | 2.3 | ||
| Occasionally | 10 | 16.7 | 4 | 9.4 | ||
| STD testing status | ||||||
| Yes | 6 | 10.0 | 18 | 30.0 | − 2.55* | < .001 |
| No | 54 | 90.0 | 42 | 70.0 | ||
| STD diagnosis | ||||||
| Yes | 1 | 1.7 | 7 | 11.7 | − 2.12* | < .01 |
| No | 59 | 98.3 | 53 | 88.3 | ||
| Using alcohol and having sexual intercourse | ||||||
| Yes | 20 | 33.3 | 4 | 6.7 | 4.00* | < .001 |
| No | 40 | 66.7 | 56 | 93.3 | ||
χ2 = Marginal homogeneity, ªPre-education and bPost-education, *p < .05
A statistically significant difference was found between sexual health knowledge pre-test, post-test, first follow-up and second follow-up scores (χ2 = 124.07, p < 0.05). In the paired analysis, it was determined that the post-test score was higher than the pre-test (Z = -10.08, p < 0.05), and the first follow-up score was lower than the post-test (Z = -5.63, p < 0.05). There was no difference between the first follow-up and second follow-up scores (Z = -. 84, p > 0.05) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Comparison of SHKT and sub-dimension pre-test, post-test, 1st follow-up, and second follow-up mean scores of the participants (N = 286)
| Subscale of sexual health knowledge test (test min–max score) | SHKT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-testª | Post-testb | 1st follow-upc | 2nd follow-upd | χ2/p | Paired comparison | |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Wilcoxon test | ||
| Sexual universal values (0–2) | 1.27 ± 0.78 | 1.57 ± 0.63 | 1.52 ± 0.64 | 1.50 ± 0.68 | 44.32* | b,c > a |
| Sexual identity development (0–4) | 1.86 ± 0.96 | 2.54 ± 1.13 | 2.49 ± 1.11 | 2.39 ± 1.09 | 96.85* | b,c > a |
| Sexual orientations (0–3) | 1.68 ± 0.89 | 1.91 ± 0.93 | 1.77 ± 0.97 | 1.73 ± 0.96 | 23.61* | b > a,c,d |
| Sex–gender (0–3) | 2.11 ± 0.85 | 2.21 ± 0.84 | 2.09 ± 0.95 | 2.15 ± 0.90 | 8.53* | b > a,c |
| Anatomy of reproduction system (0–3) | 1.50 ± 0.96 | 1.67 ± 0.93 | 1.58 ± 0.93 | 1.59 ± 0.94 | 7.78* | b > a |
| Sexual relationship satisfaction (0–4) | 2.61 ± 1.01 | 3.08 ± 1.04 | 2.91 ± 1.09 | 2.90 ± 1.13 | 60.14* | b,c > a |
| Reproductive physiology (0–3) | 1.35 ± 0.72 | 1.62 ± 0.86 | 1.50 ± 0.84 | 1.55 ± 0.82 | 33.80* | b,c > a |
| Contraception (0–6) | 3.44 ± 1.36 | 4.04 ± 1.47 | 3.9 ± 1.51 | 3.91 ± 1.57 | 56.28* | b,c > a |
| Sexually transmitted infections (0–7) | 3.46 ± 1.40 | 4.17 ± 1.64 | 3.90 ± 1.75 | 3.91 ± 1.62 | 56.61* | b,c > a |
| Sexual violence (0–3) | 2.13 ± 0.88 | 2.23 ± 0.94 | 2.09 ± 1.02 | 2.09 ± 1.02 | 9.06* | b > c |
| Safe sexual behavior (0–2) | 0.84 ± 0.68 | 1.04 ± 0.74 | 0.87 ± 0.73 | 0.81 ± 0.74 | 25.18* | b > a,c,d |
| SHKT total (0–40) | 22.31 ± 5.70 | 26.13 ± 7.20 | 24.69 ± 7.78 | 24.58 ± 7.78 | 124.07* | b > a,c |
χ2 = Friedman test, ªPre-education, bPost-education, cPost-education (30th day) and dPost-education (60th day), *p < .05
Except for the sexual violence sub-dimension, the post-test scores of the sub-dimensions were significantly higher than the pre-test (p < 0.05). At the same time, the first follow-up score was significantly higher than the pre-test in sub-dimensions of universal values, development of sexual identity, sexual satisfaction, reproductive physiology, contraception and STD. A significant decrease was found in the sub-dimensions of sexual orientations, gender, sexual violence and safe sexual behavior during the follow-up periods (Table 4).
Acceptability
In this study, 96.5% of the participants stated that they liked the education, 96.2% found the education useful, 86.0% found the online education convenient and 96.9% would use the information they learned. The acceptability of the program did not make a significant difference in terms of gender (Suppl. Table S1).
Participants, in general, found the feasibility of the education to be highly favorable. Male participants found the duration of education more adequate than female participants. No technical or user-related problems were encountered during data collection and education. Participants were highly satisfied with the presentation, tone of voice, speed of expression, use of understandable language and communication by the educators (Sup. Table S1).
Discussion
The Islamic faith does not forbid sexual health education; on the contrary, this form of education is both acknowledged and expected (Quran, 2020). The important thing is to design a sexual health education program that is appropriate for Muslim societies. The aim of this study was to design a sexual health education program in Muslim countries and to evaluate its acceptability and effectiveness. According to our study results, it was determined that the sexual health education program was found to be acceptable and useful by Muslim university students, and had high feasibility in terms of education duration, tools, methods and content, increased the knowledge level of Muslim university students, it is considered to be an effective and feasible sexual health program to improve the sexual health of Muslim university students.
As observed in the previous research (Albanghali & Othman, 2020; Di̇şsi̇z et al., 2020; Farahani, 2020; Yanıkekrem & Üstgörül, 2019), in this study, it was determined that more than half of the Muslim university students had not received sexual health education before, and their sexual health knowledge level was moderate. In the systematic review conducted by Alomair et al. (2020), studies conducted with female university students in 13 Muslim countries were examined, and Muslim women had poor knowledge regarding STI signs and symptoms, prevention, diagnosis and treatment, in addition to many misconceptions. These results highlight the need for culturally sensitive sexual health education program for Muslim university students.
Our study supports the general finding in the previous research (Farahani, 2020; Fatemi et al., 2024; Nadeem et al., 2021) that a low percentage of people are sexually active before marriage. Premarital sex that occurs without young people being equipped with the knowledge and skills to safely negotiate sexual relationships also represents an imminent threat to their health. Although premarital sex is not accepted in Muslim societies and ignorance about sexuality and sexual risks may negatively affect Muslim individuals' safe sex practices during their first contact with sex. Consequently, there is a real need to inform and prepare Muslim university students for their first experiences of sexual intercourse. The abstinence-only model tends to be supported in contexts where religious beliefs are stronger and non-procreative sexual practices and partnerships are censured (Horanieh et al., 2020). However, in our study, considering that Muslim students may be sexually active, comprehensive sexual health education was provided, monogamy was emphasized, and the religious dimension of premarital intercourse was used. This training is thought to support the effectiveness of the program.
In this study, the Muslim university students stated that they liked the online sexual health program, found it appropriate and useful and would use the information they learned. In the study conducted by Bauermeister et al. (2015), it was stated that the participants found the programs that included online health education appropriate in terms of privacy and acceptability. In this study, the program was highly acceptable, and the positive results obtained during the follow-up period show that the Muslim university students used the information they learned. The comprehensive content of the program and the ability to access the program without the time and place limit with the ability to watch the record (at home, by mobile phone, computer, etc.) can be considered as factors that increase acceptability and satisfaction. In addition to the easy accessibility of online programs, the communication of the educator (Ghamdi et al., 2016), the comprehensibility of the language (Dessel et al., 2017) and competence (De Metz & Bezuidenhout, 2018) have an impact on the success of the program (Borawski et al., 2015). In this study, the Muslim university students stated that they were highly satisfied with the presentation, tone of voice, speed of expression, use of understandable language and communication of the educators. It is thought that choosing gender-specific educators is beneficial in increasing the effectiveness of the program by making the students feel more comfortable during education and asking their questions easily.
Studies confirm the effectiveness of religious beliefs and faiths on appropriate sex education and controlling and preventing sexual relationships before marriage or out of wedlock. In a review article, Bahrami et al. (2022) confirmed the significant role of religion in individuals’ beliefs, especially in discouraging adolescents from having sexual relationships before marriage. In the study, at the end of the sexual health education program, the protection rate of Muslim university students during sexual intercourse increased at the end of the program, while the rate of having alcohol-induced sexual intercourse decreased in our study. In addition, the increase in the rate of participants who had STD tests and were diagnosed after education was evaluated as the positive contribution of the program in terms of early diagnosis and treatment. The increase in the rate of Muslim university students who answered “I am completely against the sexual intercourse experience before marriage” after the program was found to be important in terms of adopting one sexual partner. Islamic law considers sexual intercourse outside legal marriage to be adultery and a sin (Khaerunisa, 2021).
After the program, all sub-dimension post-test scores of the Muslim university students except total sexual health and sexual violence were found to be higher than the pre-test. In addition, the first follow-up score was higher than the pre-test in sub-dimensions of universal values, development of sexual identity, sexual satisfaction, reproductive physiology, contraception and STD. However, relapses were observed during the follow-up periods in sub-dimensions of sexual orientations, gender, sexual violence and safe sexual behavior. These results show that additional methods are needed to ensure the long-term permanence of education. In the future studies, especially considering the relapsed sub-dimensions, it may be suggested to increase the permanence of education with additional applications such as updating programs or text messages.
Strengths and Limitations
There were several limitations in this study. This study used only Muslim university students and that they were selected through an online sampling technique, so the question remains whether or not the results can be generalized to other populations. In studies on sexuality in Muslim countries, it is not known whether what people say about their sexuality corresponds to what they actually do. Social desirability may have affected participant responses, especially because there was no control group for the intervention. In addition, the responses to the scales are based on self-report. This may lead to response bias.
Conclusions
According to our study results, it was determined that more than half of Muslim university students did not receive sexual health education before university education. Young Muslims should be educated on sexual health issues at an early age, and services should be provided to those in need. Therefore, there is a need for sexual health programs that are acceptable to both countries and young Muslims. The aim of this study was to design a sexual health education program in Muslim countries and to evaluate its acceptability and effectiveness. It showed that this sexual health education program was applied to Muslim students and achieved the desired results. As a result of this program, it is thought that the knowledge level of Muslim university students increased, and the participants found the program acceptable and useful within the framework of their religious beliefs and that it is an effective and applicable sexual health program to improve their sexual health.
The sexual health education program designed and implemented in this study will be of value in communities with similar religious beliefs and views. Further study in different settings is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention for scale-up. In addition, the acceptability and effectiveness of this program can be investigated by applying it to Muslim high school students.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank all university students who participated in the study.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Ethical approval
All the procedures completed in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye (Code no. 2019/143-727) and operated in accordance with the ethical principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments or comparable standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was also obtained from all study participants.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Adamczyk, A., & Hayes, B. E. (2012). Religion and sexual behaviors. American Sociological Review,77(5), 723–746. 10.1177/0003122412458672 [Google Scholar]
- Albanghali, M. A., & Othman, B. A. (2020). A cross-sectional study on the knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases among young adults living in Albaha, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(6), 1872. 10.3390/ijerph17061872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alomair, N., Alageel, S., Davies, N., & Bailey, J. V. (2020). Sexually transmitted infection knowledge and attitudes among Muslim women worldwide: A systematic review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters,28(1), 1731296. 10.1080/26410397.2020.1731296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashraf, S. A. (1998). The concept of sex in Islam and sex education. Muslim Education Quarterly,15(2), 37–43. [Google Scholar]
- AVERT. (2014). Sex education that works. http://www.avert.org/sex-education-works.htm.
- Bahrami, N., Peixoto, M. M., Griffiths, M. D., & Alimoradi, Z. (2022). Sexual satisfaction and cognitive schemas activated in a sexual context among Iranian married women of reproductive age. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy,48(3), 251–262. 10.1080/0092623X.2021.1986185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauermeister, J. A., Pingel, E. S., Jadwin-Cakmak, L., Harper, G. W., Horvath, K., Weiss, G., & Dittus, P. (2015). Acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a tailored online HIV/STI testing ıntervention for young men who have sex with men: The Get Connected! Program. AIDS and Behavior,19(10), 1860–1874. 10.1007/s10461-015-1009-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borawski, E. A., Tufts, K. A., Trapl, E. S., Hayman, L. L., Yoder, L. D., & Lovegreen, L. D. (2015). Effectiveness of health education teachers and school nurses teaching sexually transmitted ınfections/human immunodeficiency virus prevention knowledge and skills in high school. Journal of School Health,85(3), 189–196. 10.1111/josh.12234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Metz, N., & Bezuidenhout, A. (2018). An importance–competence analysis of the roles and competencies of e-tutors at an open distance learning institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34. 10.14742/ajet.3364
- Dessel, A. B., Kulick, A., Wernick, L. J., & Sullivan, D. (2017). The importance of teacher support: Differential impacts by gender and sexuality. Journal of Adolescence,56(1), 136–144. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di̇şsi̇z, M., Akkurt, Y.A., Sümer, G., Tavşan, C., Dede, S., Durmuş, Ş., Ayaz, K., Fuli̇n G, Ünsal, M. (2020). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin cinsel sağlık konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri ve görüşleri. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, 51(2), 78–83. 10.16948/zktipb.691007
- Evcili, F., & Golbasi, Z. (2017a). Sexual health information test: Developing, reliabiliatiy and validation. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi,1, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Evcili, F., & Golbasi, Z. (2017b). Sexual myths and sexual health knowledge levels of Turkish university students. Sexuality & Culture,21, 976–990. 10.1007/s12119-017-9436-8 [Google Scholar]
- Evcili, F., & Golbasi, Z. (2019). The effect of peer education model on sexual myths of Turkish university students: An interventional study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care,55, 239–248. 10.1111/ppc.12344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farahani, F. K. (2020). Adolescents and young people’s sexual and reproductive health in Iran: A conceptual review. Journal of Sex Research,57(6), 743–780. 10.1080/00224499.2020.1768203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fasil, N., Worku, A., Oljira, L., Tadesse, A. W., & Berhane, Y. (2022). Association between sexual and reproductive health education in peer group and comprehensive knowledge of HIV among adolescent girls in rural eastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal Open,12(10), e063292. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fatemi, M., Nazemian, N., Zarei, N., Mehraeen, M., Sadati, A. K., & Joulaei, H. (2023). Ignored sexual and reproductive health education for adolescents: Findings from a qualitative study in Southwest, Iran. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 21, 1351–1362. 10.1007/s13178-023-00834-y [Google Scholar]
- Fields, J., Gilbert, J., & Miller, M. (2015). Sexuality and education: Toward the promise of ambiguity. In J. DeLamater & R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 371–387). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Gaughran, M., & Asgary, R. (2014). On-site comprehensive curriculum to teach reproductive health to female adolescents in Kenya. Journal of Women’s Health,23(4), 358–364. 10.1089/jwh.2013.4523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghamdi, A. A., Samarji, A., & Watt, A. (2016). Essential considerations in distance education in KSA: Teacher immediacy in a virtual teaching and learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology,6(1), 17–22. 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.651 [Google Scholar]
- Hall, K. S., McDermott Sales, J., Komro, K. A., & Santelli, J. (2016). The state of sex education in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health,58(6), 595–597. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horanieh, N., Macdowall, W., & Wellings, K. (2020). Abstinence versus harm reduction approaches to sexual health education: Views of key stakeholders in Saudi Arabia. Sex Education,20(4), 425–440. 10.1080/14681811.2019.1669150 [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal, S., Zakar, R., Zakar, M. Z., & Fischer, F. (2017). Perceptions of adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health and rights: A cross-sectional study in Lahore District, Pakistan. BMC International Health and Human Rights,17(1), 5. 10.1186/s12914-017-0113-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamke, K., Widman, L., & Desmarais, S. L. (2020). Evaluation of an online sexual health program among adolescent girls with emotional and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Child and Family Studies,29(4), 1044–1054. 10.1007/s10826-019-01685-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khaerunisa, F. E. (2021). Adultery in the perspective of Islamic religious law and positive law in the Indonesian community. Journal Studia Islamika,18(2), 158–174. 10.24239/jsi.Vol18.Iss2.614 [Google Scholar]
- Latifnejad Roudsari, R., Javadnoori, M., Hasanpour, M., Hazavehei, S. M. M., & Taghipour, A. (2013). Socio-cultural challenges to sexual health education for female adolescents in Iran. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine,11(2), 101–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemon, K. D. (2019). Sex education in America: Abstaining from comprehensive facts. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health,64(2), 149–153. 10.1111/jmwh.12901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahmodi, Y., & Valiee, S. (2016). A clinical trial of the effect of sexual health education on the quality of life of married Muslim women in Iran. Women and Birth,29(1), e18–e22. 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller, M. B. (2019). Comparison of community college students’ sexual health dimensions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,43(6), 401–415. 10.1080/10668926.2018.1490216 [Google Scholar]
- Nadeem, A., Cheema, M. K., & Zameer, S. (2021). Perceptions of Muslim parents and teachers towards sex education in Pakistan. Sex Education,21(1), 106–118. 10.1080/14681811.2020.1753032 [Google Scholar]
- Quran. (2020). Quran. https://quran.com/?local=en
- Rosenfield, A. (1997). Reproductive health issues in Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health,1, 5–6. PMID: 10214397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanjakdar, F., & Yip, A. K.-T. (Eds). (2017). Critical pedagogy, sexuality education and young people. Peter Lang. 10.3726/b11365
- Sexuality Information and Education Council (SIECUS). (2009). Report of public support of sexuality education. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/8556521DD9D4A9E64925762000240120-UNESCO-Aug2009.pdf.
- Shaikh, A., & Ochani, R. K. (2018). The need for sexuality education in Pakistan. Cureus,10(5), e2693. 10.7759/cureus.2693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, S. A., & El-Bassel, N. (2014). The influence of religion on sexual HIV risk. AIDS and Behavior,18(8), 1569–1594. 10.1007/s10461-014-0714-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shirpak, K. R., Chinichian, M., Maticka-Tyndale, E., Ardebili, H. E., Pourreza, A., & Ramenzankhani, A. (2008). A qualitative assessment of the sex education needs of married Iranian women. Sexuality & Culture,12(3), 133–150. 10.1007/s12119-008-9023-0 [Google Scholar]
- Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2021). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Tabatabaie, A. (2015). Constructing the ideal Muslim sexual subject: Problematics of school-based sex education in Iran. Sex Education,15(2), 204–216. 10.1080/14681811.2014.992066 [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. (2018). International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education: An Evidence-Informed Approach. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260770
- Weaver, H., Smith, G., & Kippax, S. (2005). School-based sex education policies and indicators of sexual health among young people: A comparison of the Netherlands, France, Australia and the United States. Sex Education,5(2), 171–188. 10.1080/14681810500038889 [Google Scholar]
- Widman, L., Kamke, K., Evans, R., Stewart, J. L., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Golin, C. E. (2020). Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief online sexual health program for adolescents. Journal of Sex Research,57(2), 145–154. 10.1080/00224499.2019.1630800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanıkekrem, E., & Üstgörül, S. (2019). Cinsel sağlık dersi alan ve almayan hemşirelik öğrencilerinin cinsel sağlık eğitimi hakkında görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi,7(1), 12–27. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

