Skip to main content
Photosynthetica logoLink to Photosynthetica
. 2025 Feb 13;63(1):37–45. doi: 10.32615/ps.2025.003

Relative importance of chlorophyll metabolic genes for light-induced greening of potato tubers

S Tanios 1, T Thangavel 1, A Eyles 1, RS Tegg 1, CR Wilson 1,*
PMCID: PMC12012421  PMID: 40270909

Abstract

Potato tuber greening occurs due to the chlorophyll accumulation upon exposure to light, however, fundamental information on tuber chlorophyll metabolism is lacking. We measured the effect of varying light exposure (0, 48, 96, and 168 h) on chlorophyll concentration and gene expression of enzymes in the chlorophyll metabolic pathway in the potato varieties that differ in greening propensity. Greening was associated with the upregulation of genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis, particularly glutamyl-tRNA reductase 1, magnesium-chelatase subunit H, and magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase, and downregulation of genes involved in chlorophyll cycling and degradation, including chlorophyllide a oxygenase, and pheophorbide a oxygenase. Our findings suggest that relative resistance to tuber greening propensity may be due to a weaker upregulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis genes and weaker downregulation of chlorophyll degradation genes that occurs in susceptible varieties. The association of these biosynthesis and degradation genes with greening susceptibility may provide possible breeding targets for the future development of more greening-resistant varieties.

Keywords: chlorophyll biosynthesis, chlorophyll degradation, chlorophyll metabolic pathway, tuber greening

Highlights

  • Chlorophyll gene expression associated with potato tuber greening was determined

  • Light exposure alters the expression of both biosynthesis and degradation genes

  • Greening resistance was associated with relative changes in chlorophyll synthesis and degradation gene regulation

Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers are underground-modified stems with cells filled with amyloplasts, nonpigmented starch-storing plastids. Upon exposure to light, amyloplasts, located in the peripheral cell layers of the tubers, differentiate into chloroplasts, which accumulate the green photosynthetic pigment, chlorophyll (Chl) (Anstis and Northcote 1973). This tuber-greening process is influenced by genetic, cultural, physiological (Tanios et al. 2020a,b,c), and environmental factors. Tuber greening may occur following light exposure at any stage along the potato supply chain and poses a major challenge to both growers and retailers, leading to loss of tuber marketability (Bamberg et al. 2015, Tanios et al. 2018).

Plastids are cellular organelles with high morphological and functional diversity found in plants and algae (Liebers et al. 2017). Starting from an undifferentiated small proplastid, these organelles can develop into four different forms, chloroplasts, chromoplasts, amyloplasts, and etioplasts, which can interconvert into each other upon environmentally induced alterations in plant development such as light exposure (Anstis and Northcote 1973, Liebers et al. 2017). Knowledge of the structural and molecular changes associated with plastid transition and Chl biosynthesis in potato tubers is limited. Differentiation events described include the elongation of vesicles into thylakoids, the appearance of ribosomes in the stroma, and the synthesis of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) and other proteins (Zhu et al. 1984).

Chlorophyll is essential for light harvesting and energy transfer during photosynthesis (Chen 2014). The Chl metabolic pathway (Fig. 1) can be divided into three stages: (1) synthesis of Chl a from glutamate; (2) the interconversion between Chl a and Chl b; and (3) degradation of Chl a into a nonfluorescent Chl catabolite. Important progress has been made in the elucidation and characterization of genes involved in chlorophyll metabolism and the determination of their light regulation in leaves, particularly in the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana (Tanaka and Tanaka 2007, Liu et al. 2017). In contrast, there are very few studies that have examined the expression of genes and regulatory pathways related to Chl metabolism during the greening process of potato tubers. Okamoto et al. (2020) showed four Chl biosynthesis genes (HEMA1, GSA, CHLH, and GUN4) were upregulated under white, blue, and red light but not under far-red light in tubers of a relatively susceptible potato variety. Wang et al. (2025) examined the expression of 17 chlorophyll-associated genes noting those involved in Chl biosynthesis were upregulated upon light exposure whilst those associated with degradation and Chl cycling were downregulated.

Fig. 1. A simplified scheme of chlorophyll metabolic pathway in angiosperms. Gene abbreviations are given in Table 1S.

Fig. 1

To confirm key genes that control Chl synthesis in potato tubers and to determine their importance for the observed variation in tuber greening propensity amongst cultivars, we first assessed the expression of chlorophyll-metabolic genes over time following exposure to light in cv. ‘Maranca’. We then compared gene expression between two varieties (‘Kennebec’ and ‘Nicola’) that vary in their tuber greening response. We hypothesized that the chlorophyll biosynthesis genes most relevant for tuber greening would fulfil at least the following criteria: (1) be strongly upregulated by light treatment, and (2) be more strongly induced in a greening susceptible than resistant potato variety.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Three potato varieties were used in this study, ‘Nicola’, ‘Maranca’, and ‘Kennebec’, known to have a low, mid, and high susceptibility to greening, respectively (Tanios et al. 2020c). Planting material was either certified seed tubers (‘Maranca’) or four-week-old tissue culture plants (‘Nicola’ and ‘Kennebec’) cultured in Murashige and Skoog medium, pH 5.8, (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with sucrose (30 g L–1), ascorbic acid (0.04 g L–1), casein hydrolysate (0.5 g L–1), and agar (8 g L–1) at 22°C with a 16-h photoperiod under cool white fluorescent lamps [65 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1]. Plants were grown from seed tubers or transplanted tissues cultured plantlets in a potting mix containing sand, peat, and composted pine bark (10:10:80; pH 6.0) premixed with Osmocote 16–3.5–10 NPK resin-coated fertilizer (Scotts Australia Pty Ltd., Baulkham Hills, Australia), under glasshouse conditions, with temperatures between 18 and 24°C. Fully expanded leaves were collected from 4-week-old ‘Maranca’ plants. Each variety was harvested following natural senescence. Any tubers that formed close to the soil surface were discarded while the rest were stored in the dark at room temperature for approximately 30 d to allow post-harvest maturation.

Expression analysis of chlorophyll-metabolic genes after light exposure (‘Maranca’)

Tubers of cv. ‘Maranca’ were exposed to light for 0, 48, 96, and 168 h with three tubers per light treatment. Treatments were referred to as T0, T48, T96, and T168, respectively. Light treatment involved uniformly sized tubers free of visible damage and were subject to continuous exposure to fluorescent light (Fig. 1S, supplement) with an intensity of 12 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1 at the tuber surface at room temperature. Tubers were arranged in rows and their places within the row were repositioned daily to avoid any possible bias of positioning from variation in light intensity, ensuring that the orientation of the tuber remained the same. Following light exposure, Chl concentration within tubers and the expression of genes encoding Chl biosynthesis and degradation enzymes from the different light-treated samples were assessed as described below.

Comparative expression analysis of chlorophyll-metabolic genes after light exposure (‘Nicola’ and ‘Kennebec’)

‘Nicola’ (greening-resistant) and ‘Kennebec’ (greening-susceptible) tubers (Tanios et al. 2020c) were exposed to the same light treatment for 0, 96, and 168 h with three tubers per light treatment per cultivar. Treatments were referred to as T0, T96, and T168, respectively. Following light exposure, Chl concentration within tubers and the expression of genes encoding Chl biosynthesis and degradation enzymes from the different light-treated samples were compared, as described below.

Chlorophyll analysis

Three periderm disks (1.5 mm thick and 1 cm diameter) were cut using a cork borer from the stem, the middle, and the bud end of each tuber periderm. Leaf disc samples were obtained from the top, middle, and bottom of each leaf. The discs were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to powder using a mortar and pestle. Samples were extracted with 5 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide for Chl analysis. All samples were stored at 4°C in the dark for 24 h. After centrifugation for 15 min at 2,500 × g, the absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Spectronic 200E) at 647 and 664 nm. Chl concentrations were determined according to Porra et al. (1989), using the equation: Total Chl = 17.67 (A647) + 7.12 (A664) and expressed in mg kg–1(FM).

Expression analysis of genes encoding enzymes in the chlorophyll metabolic pathway using quantitative real-time PCR

Three periderm disks (1.5 mm thick and 1 cm diameter) were cut using a cork borer from each tuber periderm and leaf tissue, frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to powder using a mortar and pestle. Total RNA was isolated using the PowerPlant® RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following DNase treatment (DNase Max TM kit, QIAGEN), RNA yield was quantified using the Qubit® 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Mulgrave, VIC, Australia). One microgram of RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript reverse transcription supermix (BIO-RAD) following the manufacturer's protocol. Potato nucleotide sequences for each target gene were obtained from the NCBI database. Gene-specific primers were designed using NCBI/Primer-Blast (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) (Table 1S, supplement). There is the potential for SNPs within primer regions to affect PCR efficiency, we compared primer sequences against available data for the potato variety, ‘Russet Burbank’ (Table 1S) with the assumption that lack of any variation between diverse genotypes would suggest conserved sequences. For each gene, a standard curve was generated using a cDNA serial dilution. The qPCR reactions were carried out with one microliter cDNA using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (BIO-RAD) in a Rotor Gene 6000 instrument (QIAGEN) with a thermocycle of 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 60 s. Two technical and three independent biological replicates were used for each gene. Samples for which the difference in Ct value between the technical replicates was larger than one, were excluded from the analysis. Expression of the target genes was normalized to the reference gene EF1α (Nicot et al. 2005), and relative transcript abundances were calculated as 2–dCt.

Statistical analysis

The effect of time on the total Chl concentration of ‘Maraca’ was analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of light treatment (T0, T48, T96, T168) and variety (‘Maranca’ and ‘Kennebec’) and their interaction on total Chl concentration and gene expression were analysed by two-way ANOVA. Values of the gene expression data required log transformation to meet assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance in ANOVA. Fisher's protected least significant difference post hoc tests were used to determine significant differences between treatment means. Relative expression mean values were log2 transformed and hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes was conducted based on Euclidean distance and Ward's minimum variance clustering method. Analysis was performed using BioVinci Software (Bioturing, San Diego, CA, USA). Pearson's correlation analysis between Chl concentration and relative expression for each gene was conducted using SPSS v24 software (SPSS™ Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Chlorophyll concentration and gene expression in ‘Maranca’ tubers and leaves

Artificial light exposure treatments for 0, 48, 96, and 168 h at room temperature revealed that no Chl was detected in the periderm of ‘Maranca’ tubers stored in darkness (T0), with Chl concentrations gradually increasing with the duration of light treatment (Fig. 2). In ‘Maranca’ leaves, Chl concentration was on average 7.2-fold higher compared to tubers after exposure to 168 h of light (41 mg kg–1 vs 5.7 mg kg–1).

Fig. 2. Total chlorophyll concentration in potato tubers of the ‘Maranca’ variety following light exposure for 0 (A), 48 (B), 96 (C), and 168 h (D). Data was analysed by one-way ANOVA at P<0.005. * Indicates a significant increase compared with T0. n = 3.

Fig. 2

The expression of most Chl metabolic genes was noticeably higher in potato leaves when compared to tubers exposed to light for 168 h (Fig. 3). However, hierarchical clustering of Chl-biosynthesis genes in potato tuber revealed three major expression patterns (Fig. 3). Genes in group 1 were highly upregulated by light including glutamyl-tRNA reductase 1 (HEMA1), magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase (CRD), and magnesium-chelatase subunit H (CHLH) which showed strong and sustained RNA expression that increased with light exposure and was highly correlated with tuber Chl content (Table 1); and magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase (CHLM), NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR), and 7-hydroxymethyl chlorophyll a reductase (HCAR) which also showed strongly increasing RNA expression to T48 but then tended to decrease at T168.

Fig. 3. Expression profiles of chlorophyll-metabolic genes in potato tubers of ‘Maranca’ following light exposure for 0, 48, 96, and 168 h (as denoted by T0, T48, T96, and T168, respectively) and 4-week-old plant leaves (as denoted by L). Gene expression was analysed by quantitative real-time PCR and normalised to the reference gene, EF1α. Data represent log2 average expression values from three biological and two technical replications. Data was clustered concerning the gene expression profile with dendrograms shown on the top of the heatmap using BioVinci software (BioTuring, San Diego, CA, USA). Gene abbreviations are given in Table 1S. n = 3.

Fig. 3

Table 1. Pearson's correlation coefficients between chlorophyll concentration and relative expression of the genes over 0, 96, and 160 h for the ‘Maranca’ variety. The symbols *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001, respectively.

Gene R
HEMA1 0.800**
HEMA2-like 0.618*
GSA 0.799**
HEMB 0.966**
HEMC 0.753**
HEMD 0.385
HEME 0.897**
HEMF 0.923**
HEMG 0.805**
CHLH 0.862**
CHLD 0.975**
CHLI 0.966**
CHLM –0.108
CRD 0.997**
POR 0.092
DVR 0.818**
CHLG 0.132
CAO –0.262
HCAR 0.160
NYC –0.946**
NOL 0.703*
CLH –0.024
PPH –0.951**
PAO –0.952**
RCCR 0.209

Expression of genes in group 2 either gradually increased upon light exposure (or remained relatively constant across the light treatments (Fig. 3). Most of the genes in group 2, showed significant positive correlations with tuber Chl content (Table 1), however, expression of group 2 genes was less influenced by light than those in group 1. Genes in group 3 either gradually decreased in expression following light exposure [pheophorbide a oxygenase (PAO)], and were negatively correlating with tuber Chl content (Table 1), or showed low constitutive expression in the dark, that remained constant after light exposure [chlorophyllide a oxygenase (CAO); Fig. 3].

Chlorophyll concentration and gene expression in ‘Nicola’ compared to ‘Kennebec’ tubers

Two varieties, ‘Nicola’ and ‘Kennebec’, known to have a low and high susceptibility to greening were exposed to light for 0, 48, 96, and 169 h. At T0, no Chl was detected in ‘Nicola’ and ‘Kennebec’ tubers, with concentrations gradually increasing with the duration of light treatment (Fig. 4). At T96 and T168, Chl concentration was respectively 6-fold and 4-fold higher in ‘Kennebec’ compared to ‘Nicola’ (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4. Total chlorophyll concentration in potato tubers of ‘Nicola’ and ‘Kennebec’ following light exposure for 0, 96, and 168 h. Data was analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Fischer's protected LSD post-hoc test. * Indicates a significant treatment effect within a measurement date. n = 3. P<0.05.

Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Expression profiles of chlorophyll metabolic genes in potato tubers of ‘Nicola’ (blue line) and ‘Kennebec’ (red line), following light exposure for 0, 96, and 168 h. Gene expression was analysed by quantitative real-time PCR and normalised to the reference gene, EF1α. Data represent average expression values from three biological and two technical replications ± SE. Data was analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Fischer's protected LSD post-hoc test. * Indicates a significant treatment effect at the same time point of the two varieties. n = 3. Gene abbreviations are given in Table 1S. A summary of ANOVA output for each gene is provided in Table 2S.

Fig. 5

There were significant differences in gene expression between ‘Kennebec’ and ‘Nicola’ tubers (Fig. 5; Table 2S, supplement). Of the 17 Chl-biosynthesis genes, most of them increased after light exposure for both varieties. However, after 168 h of light exposure, 14 of them were significantly higher in ‘Kennebec’ compared to ‘Nicola’ except for HEMA2-like, HEMF, and CHLG (Fig. 5). Overall, most Chl-biosynthesis genes were highly positively correlated with tuber Chl concentration for both cultivars (Table 2). In contrast, there were negative correlations between NYC, CLH, PPH, and Chl concentration. Of the four Chl cycle genes, only HCAR was significantly higher in ‘Kennebec’ than ‘Nicola’ following light exposure for both 96 and 168 h. Regardless of variety, the expression of NYC, PPH, and PAO decreased after light exposure (Fig. 5), showing a significant negative correlation with tuber Chl concentration (Table 2).

Table 2. Pearson's correlation coefficients between chlorophyll concentration and relative gene expression during tuber greening of ‘Nicola’ (greening-resistant variety) and ‘Kennebec’ (greening-susceptible variety). The symbols *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001, respectively.

Gene ‘Nicola’
R
‘Kennebec’
R
HEMA1 0.993** 0.995**
HEMA2-like 0.632 0.309
GSA 0.866** 0.965**
HEMB 0.949** 0.864**
HEMC 0.954** 0.990**
HEMD 0.665 0.986**
HEME 0.980** 0.978**
HEMF 0.748* 0.704*
HEMG 0.909** 0.967**
CHLH 0.980** 0.996**
CHLD 0.988** 0.938**
CHLI 0.982** 0.963**
CHLM 0.802** 0.941**
CRD 0.965** 0.997**
POR 0.708* 0.956**
DVR 0.992** 0.989**
CHLG –0.211 0.579
CAO 0.450 0.458
HCAR 0.834** 0.925**
NYC –0.972** –0.871**
NOL 0.873** 0.877**
CLH 0.702* 0.365
PPH –0.874** –0.957**
PAO –0.909** –0.884**
RCCR 0.511 –0.142

Discussion

We found good support for our first hypothesis that Chl biosynthesis genes are upregulated in light-induced potato greening. In particular, there was strong upregulation of Chl-biosynthesis genes, HEMA1, CHLH, and CRD, with concurrent downregulation of key genes in the chlorophyll cycle and degradation, including CAO and PAO. This confirms and expands on the findings of Wang et al. (2025). Furthermore, as proposed by our second hypothesis, there was evidence of greater upregulation and downregulation of these Chl biosynthesis and degradation genes observed in the tuber greening-susceptible variety compared to the resistant variety. In potato leaves, in contrast, there was a much stronger upregulation of Chl-biosynthesis genes and only limited downregulation of the Chl-degradation genes. Based on these results, we propose that these genes are key transcriptional regulatory genes in potato tuber greening.

Our data revealed that potato greening is associated with the activation of a series of genes involved in Chl biosynthesis, which were also responsible for the differential greening response between greening-resistant and susceptible varieties. In potato, the two genes encoding HEMA1 and HEMA2-like, sharing 66% amino acid sequence identity, showed different light regulation. Only the expression of HEMA1 was found to be strongly upregulated by light, while that of HEMA2-like was independent of light. Similar results were reported in potato tubers (Okamoto et al. 2020) and in Arabidopsis leaves, with three isoforms of HEMA (HEMA1, HEMA2, HEMA3) (Ujwal et al. 2002, Yuan et al. 2017), where HEMA1 was highly expressed in photosynthetic tissues and responded to light (McCormac et al. 2001, McCormac and Terry 2002). In contrast, HEMA2 expression is found exclusively in nonphotosynthetic tissues and is not responsive to illumination (Kumar et al. 1996).

Another key regulatory gene in the pathway is CHLH, encoding a subunit of the Mg-chelatase. Although our results showed that the expression of the three Mg-chelatase subunits (CHLH, CHLD, CHLI), which catalyse the insertion of Mg2+ into protoporphyrin IX, was induced by light and was higher in the susceptible compared to the resistant variety, CHLH was the most strongly upregulated and thus, is one of the major determinants of the flux of protoporphyrin IX into Chl biosynthesis in tubers. Consistent with our results, CHLH expression was rapidly induced by light in potato tubers (Okamoto et al. 2020, Wang et al. 2025) and in Arabidopsis foliar material (Matsumoto et al. 2004, Stephenson and Terry 2008) and T-DNA insertion mutation in OsCHLH caused a high reduction in Chl biosynthesis and subsequent seedling-lethal phenotype in rice (Jung et al. 2003).

A third key Chl-biosynthesis gene, which was shown in this study to be strongly induced upon light exposure is CRD1, which catalyses a cyclical reaction in the creation of the E ring of chlorophyll and form 3,8-divinyl-protochlorophyllide. Similar upregulation in light-exposed potato tubers was found by Wang et al. (2025). In rice, OsCRD1 was mainly expressed in green tissues and mutation in OsCRD1 led to a deficiency in Chl biosynthesis, chloroplast development, and decreased photosynthetic capacity (Wang et al. 2017).

The expression of CHLM, POR, and HCAR was also strongly light-induced, although it tended to reduce at T168. CHLM was shown to be constitutively expressed at the transcriptional and translational levels during greening in etiolated barley and tobacco (Yuan et al. 2017) and in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutants, in which defects in CHLM resulted in reductions of PSI and PSII core components as well as light-harvesting proteins (Meinecke et al. 2010). In contrast, mRNA levels of CHLM remained constant during greening in Arabidopsis (Matsumoto et al. 2004) and tobacco and barley seedlings (Alawady and Grimm 2005). Several POR gene families have been identified in angiosperms, which catalyse the photoreduction of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) a to chlorophyllide a, that encode highly conserved POR polypeptides, with different light- and development-dependent regulatory mechanisms. For example, three POR genes (PORA, PORB, and PORC) were found in A. thaliana, where PORA expression is downregulated by light, while PORB is less light sensitive, and its mRNA and protein remain almost unchanged, and PORC is upregulated in response to light and is postulated to enable elevated rates of Chl synthesis under high light (Su et al. 2001). Database search of the S. tuberosum genome showed the existence of three POR homologs, sharing more than 80% amino acid sequence identity. In this study, only the expression of one POR homolog was studied, showing strong upregulation by light, sharing 75.80, 75.87, and 76.24% identity with AtPORA, AtPORB and AtPORC, respectively. Wang et al. (2025) also showed upregulation of POR1 in potato tubers exposed to light. Interestingly, chlorophyllide a oxygenase (CAO), which catalyses the oxygenation of Chlide a producing Chlide b showed very low expression levels in the dark and light in all three varieties tested. In contrast, CAO expression was rapidly induced by light in Arabidopsis (Espineda et al. 1999, Matsumoto et al. 2004) and was classified as one of the key regulatory genes in the pathway together with HEMA1, CHLH, and CRD1 (Matsumoto et al. 2004).

Our results showed that light downregulated the expression of PAO, which negatively correlated with Chl synthesis during tuber greening. Stronger downregulation was found in the susceptible variety compared to the resistant one, although the differences were not always significant. In Wang et al. (2025), PAO expression increased in potato tubers with storage time (0–12 d) but was not light-induced and dark-stored tubers had greater transcript levels after 12 d supporting our findings. Previous studies revealed a role of these genes in Chl retention during leaf senescence or yellowing, where mutations in PAO (Pružinská et al. 2005) in Arabidopsis lead to a stay-green phenotype. It was suggested that the low expression levels of Chl-biosynthesis genes and the high expression levels of Chl-catabolic genes lead to the absence of Chl in non-green carnation petals (Ohmiya et al. 2014) and white chrysanthemum petals (Ohmiya et al. 2017). Thus, we hypothesise that the constitutively higher expression of PAO promotes an improved resistance to greening.

Conclusions

We propose that, upon exposure of tubers to light, the increasing expression of key chlorophyll-biosynthesis genes and decreasing expression of key chlorophyll-degradation genes drive tuber greening. Furthermore, the extent of up- and downregulation of these genes varies between varieties depending upon their relative resistance to tuber greening. Greening in the susceptible variety was associated with greater upregulation of chlorophyll-synthesis genes and greater downregulation of chlorophyll-degradation and cycling genes than in the greening-resistant variety. Several studies have identified and tested the potential of tuber-specific promoters to drive tuber-specific gene expression (Diretto et al. 2007, Li et al. 2013, Ha et al. 2015), therefore future investigations, manipulating the expression of the identified key genes, specifically in tubers, could assist in the development of greening resistant varieties.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Ross Corkrey for statistical advice and Ms Annabel Wilson for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council’s Industrial Transformation Training Centre scheme under Grant IC140100024.

Abbreviations

ALA

aminolevulinic acid

ANOVA

analysis of variance

AtPORA

Arabidopsis thaliana NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A

AtPORB

Arabidopsis thaliana NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B

AtPORC

Arabidopsis thaliana NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase C

CAO

chlorophyllide a oxygenase

Chl

chlorophyll

CHLD

magnesium-chelatase subunit D

CHLG

chlorophyll synthase

CHLH

magnesium-chelatase subunit H

CHLI

magnesium-chelatase subunit I

CHLM

magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase

CLH

chlorophyllase

CRD

magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase

DVR

divinyl chlorophyllide a 8-vinyl-reductase

EF1α

elongation factor 1 alpha

GluTR

glutamyl-tRNA reductase

GSA

glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase

GUN4

genomes uncoupled 4

HCAR

7-hydroxymethyl chlorophyll a reductase

HEMA1

glutamyl-tRNA reductase 1

HEMA2-like

glutamyl-tRNA reductase 2-like

HEMB

delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase

HEMC

porphobilinogen deaminase

HEMD

uroporphyrinogen-III synthase

HEME

uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase

HEMF

coproporphyrinogen-III oxidase

HEMG

protoporphyrinogen oxidase

NOL

chlorophyll(ide) b reductase NOL

NYC

chlorophyll(ide) b reductase NYC1

OsCHLH

rice magnesium-chelatase subunit H

OsCRD1

rice magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase

PAO

pheophorbide a oxygenase

POR

NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase

PPH

pheophytinase

qPCR

quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RCCR

red chlorophyll catabolite reductase

Rubisco

ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase

SNPs

single nucleotide polymorphisms

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Files
PS-63-1-63037-s001.docx (44.2KB, docx)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alawady A.E., Grimm B.: Tobacco Mg protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase is involved in inverse activation of Mg porphyrin and protoheme synthesis. – Plant J. 41: 282-290, 2005. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02291.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anstis P.J.P., Northcote D.H.: Development of chloroplasts from amyloplasts in potato tuber discs. – New Phytol. 72: 449-463, 1973. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1973.tb04394.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg J., Moehninsi, Navarre R., Suriano J.: Variation for tuber greening in the diploid wild potato Solanum microdontum. – Am. J. Potato Res. 92: 435-443, 2015. 10.1007/s12230-015-9454-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen M.: Chlorophyll modifications and their spectral extension in oxygenic photosynthesis. – Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83: 317-340, 2014. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-162943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diretto G., Al-Babili S., Tavazza R. et al.: Metabolic engineering of potato carotenoid content through tuber-specific overexpression of a bacterial mini-pathway. – PLoS ONE 2: e350, 2007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Espineda C.E., Linford A.S., Devine D., Brusslan J.A.: The AtCAO gene, encoding chlorophyll a oxygenase, is required for chlorophyll b synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. – PNAS 96: 10507-10511, 1999. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ha J., Moon K., Kim M. et al.: The laccase promoter of potato confers strong tuber-specific expression in transgenic plants. – Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 120: 57-68, 2015. 10.1007/s11240-014-0578-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jung K.-H., Hur J., Ryu C.-H. et al.: Characterization of a rice chlorophyll-deficient mutant using the T-DNA gene-trap system. – Plant Cell Physiol. 44: 463-472, 2003. 10.1093/pcp/pcg064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar A.M., Csankovszki G., Söll D.: A second and differentially expressed glutamyl-tRNA reductase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. – Plant Mol. Biol. 30: 419-426, 1996. 10.1007/BF00049321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li M., Song B., Zhang Q. et al.: A synthetic tuber-specific and cold-induced promoter is applicable in controlling potato cold-induced sweetening. – Plant Physiol. Biochem. 67: 41-47, 2013. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liebers M., Grübler B., Chevalier F. et al.: Regulatory shifts in plastid transcription play a key role in morphological conversions of plastids during plant development. – Front. Plant Sci. 8: 23, 2017. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu X., Li Y., Zhong S.: Interplay between light and plant hormones in the control of Arabidopsis seedling chlorophyll biosynthesis. – Front. Plant Sci. 8: 1433, 2017. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matsumoto F., Obayashi T., Sasaki-Sekimoto Y. et al.: Gene expression profiling of the tetrapyrrole metabolic pathway in Arabidopsis with a mini-array system. – Plant Physiol. 135: 2379-2391, 2004. 10.1104/pp.104.042408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCormac A.C., Fischer A., Kumar A.M. et al.: Regulation of HEMA1 expression by phytochrome and a plastid signal during de-etiolation in Arabidopsis thaliana. – Plant J. 25: 549-561, 2001. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00986.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCormac A.C., Terry M.J.: Light-signalling pathways leading to the co-ordinated expression of HEMA1 and Lhcb during chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana. – Plant J. 32: 549-559, 2002. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01443.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meinecke L., Alawady A., Schroda M. et al.: Chlorophyll-deficient mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that accumulate magnesium protoporphyrin IX. – Plant Mol. Biol. 72: 643-658, 2010. 10.1007/s11103-010-9604-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murashige R., Skoog F.: A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue culture. – Physiol. Plantarum 15: 473-479, 1962. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nicot N., Hausman J.-F., Hoffmann L., Evers D.: Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. – J. Exp. Bot. 56: 2907-2914, 2005. 10.1093/jxb/eri285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ohmiya A., Hirashima M., Yagi M. et al.: Identification of genes associated with chlorophyll accumulation in flower petals. – PLoS One 9: e113738, 2014. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohmiya A., Sasaki K., Nashima K. et al.: Transcriptome analysis in petals and leaves of chrysanthemums with different chlorophyll levels. – BMC Plant Biol. 17: 202, 2017. 10.1186/s12870-017-1156-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Okamoto H., Ducreux L.J.M., Allwood J.W. et al.: Light regulation of chlorophyll and glycoalkaloid biosynthesis during tuber greening of potato S. tuberosum. – Front. Plant Sci. 11: 753, 2020. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Porra R.J., Thompson W.A., Kriedemann P.E.: Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. – BBA-Bioenergetics 975: 384-394, 1989. 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pružinská A., Tanner G., Aubry S. et al.: Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent Arabidopsis leaves. Characterization of chlorophyll catabolites and of chlorophyll catabolic enzymes involved in the degreening reaction. – Plant Physiol. 139: 52-63, 2005. 10.1104/pp.105.065870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stephenson P.G., Terry M.J.: Light signalling pathways regulating the Mg-chelatase branchpoint of chlorophyll synthesis during de-etiolation in Arabidopsis thaliana. – Photoch. Photobio. Sci. 7: 1243-1252, 2008. 10.1039/b802596g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Su Q., Frick G., Armstrong G., Apel K.: POR C of Arabidopsis thaliana: a third light- and NADPH-dependent proto-chlorophyllide oxidoreductase that is differentially regulated by light. – Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 805-813, 2001. 10.1023/A:1013699721301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tanaka R., Tanaka A.: Tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in higher plants. – Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58: 321-346, 2007. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanios S., Eyles A., Corkrey R. et al.: Quantifying risk factors associated with light-induced potato tuber greening in retail stores. – PLoS ONE 15: e0235522, 2020a. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanios S., Eyles A., Tegg R.S., Wilson C.: Potato tuber greening: a review of predisposing factors, management and future challenges. – Am. J. Potato Res. 95: 248-257, 2018. 10.1007/s12230-018-9648-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tanios S., Tegg R.S., Eyles A. et al.: Potato tuber greening risk is associated with tuber nitrogen content. – Am. J. Potato Res. 97: 360-366, 2020b. 10.1007/s12230-020-09786-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tanios S., Thangavel T., Eyles A. et al.: Suberin deposition in potato periderm: a novel resistance mechanism against tuber greening. – New Phytol. 225: 1273-1284, 2020c. 10.1111/nph.16334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ujwal M.L., McCormac A.C., Goulding A. et al.: Divergent regulation of the HEMA gene family encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase in Arabidopsis thaliana: expression of HEMA2 is regulated by sugars, but is independent of light and plastid signalling. – Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 81-89, 2002. 10.1023/A:1016081114758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang J., Li J., Chen W. et al.: The changes in chlorophyll, solanine, and phytohormones during light-induced greening in postharvest potatoes. – Postharvest Biol. Tec. 219: 113291, 2025. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113291 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang X., Huang R., Quan R.: Mutation in Mg-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase decreases photosynthesis capacity in rice. – PLoS ONE 12: e0171118, 2017. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yuan M., Zhao Y.-Q., Zhang Z.-W. et al.: Light regulates transcription of chlorophyll biosynthetic genes during chloroplast biogenesis. – Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 36: 35-54, 2017. 10.1080/07352689.2017.1327764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu Y.S., Merkle-Lehman D.L., Kung S.D.: Light-induced transformation of amyloplasts into chloroplasts in potato tubers. – Plant Physiol. 75: 142-145, 1984. 10.1104/pp.75.1.142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Files
PS-63-1-63037-s001.docx (44.2KB, docx)

Articles from Photosynthetica are provided here courtesy of Institute of Experimental Botany ASCR

RESOURCES