Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2005 Aug;73(8):4723–4731. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4723-4731.2005

Growth Characteristics of and Virulence Factor Production by Group A Streptococcus during Cultivation in Human Saliva

Samuel A Shelburne III 1,2, Chanel Granville 2, Maria Tokuyama 2, Izabela Sitkiewicz 2, Payal Patel 2, James M Musser 2,*
PMCID: PMC1201272  PMID: 16040985

Abstract

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) commonly infects the human oropharynx, but the initial molecular events governing this process are poorly understood. Saliva is a major component of the innate and acquired immune defense in this anatomic site. Although landmark studies were done more than 60 years ago, investigation of GAS-saliva interaction has not been addressed extensively in recent years. Serotype M1 GAS strain MGAS5005 cultured in human saliva grew to ∼107 CFU/ml and, remarkably, maintained this density for up to 28 days. Strains of several other M-protein serotypes had similar initial growth patterns but did not maintain as high a CFU count during prolonged culture. As revealed by analysis of the growth of isogenic mutant strains, the ability of GAS to maintain high numbers of CFU/ml during the prolonged stationary phase in saliva was dependent on production of streptococcal inhibitor of complement (Sic) and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B (SpeB). During cultivation in human saliva, GAS had growth-phase-dependent production of multiple proven and putative extracellular virulence factors, including Sic, SpeB, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A, Mac protein, and streptococcal phospholipase A2. Our results clearly show that GAS responds in a complex fashion to growth in human saliva, suggesting that the molecular processes that enhance colonization and survival in the upper respiratory tract of humans are well under way before the organism reaches the epithelial cell surface.


One hallmark of a successful microorganism is the ability to adapt to new host environments. Group A Streptococcus (GAS) causes a wide variety of diseases in humans, ranging from impetiginous skin lesions to invasive diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis and meningitis. GAS is particularly suited to inhabit the human oropharynx, colonizing as many as one-half of school-age children in nonepidemic periods and causing an estimated 15 million cases of pharyngitis in the United States each year (3, 43). Moreover, the presence of GAS in the oropharynx generally is required for the subsequent development of rheumatic fever, the leading cause of preventable heart disease in children (10, 28).

The oropharynx is the major site of entry for GAS into the human body and its main portal of transmission (19, 43, 46). Saliva is ubiquitous in the human oropharynx and is an essential part of both the acquired and innate immune defense systems (25, 39). Landmark experiments conducted more than 60 years ago demonstrated the important role played by saliva in the establishment of GAS infection and the subsequent transmission of infectious organisms (18-20). These studies revealed that large numbers of live GAS were present in the saliva of individuals with GAS pharyngitis (19). Moreover, it was established that a major route for dissemination of GAS from infected individuals into the environment was via dispersal of aerosolized saliva (20). Other investigators have reported that pharyngitis patients with detectable levels of GAS in their saliva were more likely to transmit the organism than were individuals whose saliva did not contain GAS (26, 58). These observations, together with the known importance of saliva in host defense, identify the crucial significance of the GAS-saliva interaction. Despite this knowledge, the GAS-saliva interaction has not been extensively investigated in recent years.

To increase our understanding of this interaction, we studied the growth of GAS in saliva collected from healthy human volunteers. We used genetically diverse GAS strains to determine whether the ability of GAS to grow in saliva is widespread within the species. Western immunoblot analysis was used to test the hypothesis that proven and putative extracellular virulence proteins are produced during cultivation of GAS in saliva and to examine the relationship between virulence factor production and growth phenotypes. Finally, isogenic mutant strains were analyzed to determine whether inactivation of genes encoding extracellular virulence factors or transcriptional regulators altered the growth pattern of GAS in saliva.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture media.

Serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 has been extensively characterized and used for in vitro and animal models of GAS infection (24, 35, 50, 51, 55, 57). The other bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. GAS was grown on Trypticase soy agar containing 5% sheep blood agar (BSA) (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) in Todd-Hewitt broth containing 0.2% (wt/vol) yeast extract (THY) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) or in a commercially available chemically defined medium (CDM) (JR Biosciences, Denver, Pa.) (56).

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Straina M serotype Yr isolated Disease or source
MGAS5005 1 1996 Cerebrospinal fluid
SF370 1 1985 Wound infection
MGAS5475 1 1994 Pharyngeal
MGAS9415 1 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS11705 1 2003 Pharyngeal
MGAS315 3 1988 Toxic shock
JRS4b 6 1971 Unknown
MGAS9645 6 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS10287 6 2002 Pharyngeal
MGAS12487 9 2003 Pharyngeal
MGAS12292 11 2003 Pharyngeal
MGAS9429 12 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS6180 28 1998 Blood
MGAS9530 33 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS9464 43 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS12083 73 2003 Pharyngeal
MGAS9482 77 2001 Pharyngeal
MGAS12349 94 2003 Pharyngeal
a

MGAS, Musser group A Streptococcus.

b

Obtained from J. R. Scott.

Isogenic mutant strains of GAS.

The isogenic mutant strains used in this study were created previously by nonpolar insertional mutagenesis as described previously (12, 35, 37). The parental strain used was serotype M1 strain MGAS5005, except for the isogenic irr mutant strain JRS550, which was derived from serotype M6 strain JRS4, and the isogenic sla mutant strain, which was derived from serotype M3 strain MGAS315 (34, 35). The isogenic mutant strains were analyzed by Southern hybridization and DNA sequencing to confirm that the proper genetic constructs were made (37, 38). The absence of specific gene expression and protein production by the mutant strains was confirmed by Northern blot and Western immunoblot analysis, respectively (32, 36).

Collection of saliva from healthy human volunteers.

Saliva was collected on ice from healthy volunteers under a Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board human subjects protocol using a modification of the method described by DeJong et al. (8). Saliva production was stimulated by chewing on paraffin wax, and 2.5 mmol of dithiothreitol (DTT) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) was added to aid subsequent filtration. The saliva was clarified by centrifugation at 40,000 × g for 15 min and sterilized by filtration through a 0.20-μm filter (Nalgene Labware, Rochester, NY). The saliva was frozen at −20°C and thawed immediately prior to use. Pooled saliva collected from at least four donors was used to minimize effects of donor variation on study results.

Growth of GAS in human saliva.

Bacteria were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. A schematic of the procedures used to grow GAS is shown in Fig. 1. GAS was grown overnight on BSA to confirm colony morphology and purity. Bacteria were inoculated into THY, grown overnight, diluted 1:50 with fresh THY broth, and grown to mid-logarithmic phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of ∼0.5). A 1:50 dilution of the mid-logarithmic-phase culture was made into 10 ml of saliva to create saliva medium A. After 4.5 h of growth in saliva medium A, a second 1:50 dilution was made in 10 ml of fresh saliva (saliva medium B). Aliquots were removed from both saliva media every 1.5 h for the first 9 h and then daily thereafter and assessed for both OD600 and number of CFU. For determination of CFU, samples were serially diluted 10-fold in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma) and plated in duplicate on BSA. The plates were incubated overnight, and colonies were counted. Each experiment was performed at least in quadruplicate.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the experimental strategy used to analyze growth of GAS in human saliva. GAS strains were grown to mid-exponential phase (OD600, ∼0.5) in THY broth and diluted 1:50 in saliva medium A. After 4.5 h of growth in saliva medium A, a second 1:50 dilution was performed in saliva medium B. Samples were removed every 1.5 h for 9 h and then every 24 h for OD600 readings and CFU analysis.

Western immunoblot analysis.

GAS were grown in saliva medium, and the supernatants obtained at each time point were adjusted to be derived from 5 × 108 CFU. The culture supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 10 min. Saliva without GAS added was used as the negative control. The supernatant proteins were precipitated with 30% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma) on ice for 30 min, and the precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 17,000 × g for 15 min. The pellets were washed twice in ice-cold acetone (Sigma), dried in a speed vacuum for 10 min, and suspended in 0.1 ml of EB buffer (QIAGEN). The proteins present in the concentrated supernatants were separated with sodium dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad) and transferred (TransBlot; Bio-Rad) to nitrocellulose membranes in Towbin's buffer at 15 V for 1 h. Purified recombinant proteins were included in the Western immunoblot analyses as positive controls (24, 31). The membranes were incubated overnight in 1× Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% Liquid Block (TBSB) (Amersham Pharmacia, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and incubated for 1 h in TBSB plus primary antibody (1:10,000) (2, 32). The membranes were washed three times in PBS plus 0.1% Tween 20 (Bio-Rad), incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody (1:2,500; goat antirabbit-conjugated horseradish peroxidase; Pierce), and washed three times in PBS plus 0.1% Tween 20. The membranes were incubated with Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate reagent (Pierce) according to directions suggested by the manufacturer, exposed to HyperFilm (Amersham Pharmacia), and developed.

Addition of purified proteins to saliva.

Streptococcal inhibitor of complement (Sic) and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B (SpeB) were cloned, overexpressed, and purified as described previously (23, 27). The purified proteins were added as appropriate to saliva at physiologic concentrations, 5 μg/ml for Sic and 20 μg/ml for SpeB (16, 52).

Statistical analysis.

Differences between GAS strains grown in saliva were analyzed by determining the concentration (log10 CFU/ml) at baseline and at maximum growth in saliva medium B for each strain and then using a paired Student's t test to compare values. The ability of a particular GAS strain to persist in saliva was analyzed using a paired Student's t test to compare concentrations (log10 CFU/ml) in saliva medium B at 168 h. Statistical significance was assigned at a two-sided P value of 0.05 using Bonferroni's adjustment for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Inability to correlate OD600 values with CFU during growth in saliva.

Because obtaining CFU is time consuming, labor intensive, and expensive, most investigators use OD600 readings as a surrogate marker to analyze bacterial growth. However, in preliminary experiments, we were not able to reproducibly correlate OD600 readings with CFU concentrations obtained by serial plating. Most OD600 values were quite low, and we observed decreased OD600 values despite increased CFU and vice versa. This finding has been reported previously for other organisms and is likely due to the formation of bacterial aggregates in the saliva medium (8, 33, 42). Therefore, all bacterial growth data are expressed as numbers of CFU.

Growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in saliva.

We used serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 for our initial growth studies because it is genetically representative of M1 strains that cause a high proportion of invasive and noninvasive GAS infections and its genome has recently been sequenced (24, 40, 51). This strain's growth pattern in saliva was highly reproducible (Fig. 2A). There was a rapid increase of 1 to 1.5 log10 CFU/ml when mid-exponential-growth-phase organisms were transferred to saliva. A peak value of 2.5 × 107 CFU/ml was reached within a few hours. Surprisingly, a prolonged stationary phase was observed, characterized by a cell density of ∼1 × 107 CFU/ml that persisted for up to 28 days (Fig. 2B).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Growth patterns of serotype M1 strains in various media. Growth in saliva was assayed by subculturing exponential-growth-phase organisms from THY 1:50 into saliva (saliva medium A). After 4.5 h in saliva medium A, organisms were subcultured 1:50 into saliva medium B. Aliquots were removed at indicated time points, and numbers of CFU were determined after overnight incubation on BSA at 37°C in 5% CO2. (A) Growth over 7 days for serotype M1 strain MGAS5005. Symbols: Saliva medium A, ▴, dashed line; saliva medium B, ▪, solid line; THY medium, □, dashed line; CDM, •, solid line; saliva plus glucose, ⧫, dashed line; saliva with pH controlled, X, solid line. (B) Growth over 28 days (d) for five serotype M1 strains in saliva medium B. Symbols: MGAS5005, ▪, solid line; SF370, ▴, dashed line; MGAS5474, ▾, solid line; MGAS9415, ⧫, dashed line; MGAS11705, •, solid line. Bars represent standard deviations.

We hypothesized that the initial rapid growth in saliva was due to consumption of residual THY broth carried over during subculture of the bacteria. To test this hypothesis, we subjected organisms that had been grown in saliva medium A for 4.5 h to a second 1:50 dilution in fresh saliva (saliva medium B). The density of organisms grown in saliva medium B increased by ∼1.5 to 2.0 log10 CFU/ml over the next 24 h, despite starting from an inoculum that was nearly 1.0 log10 less than the starting inoculum in saliva medium A. The resulting density (∼1 × 107 CFU/ml) was essentially identical to that of GAS grown in saliva medium A. In addition, a similar prolonged stationary phase was observed in saliva medium B. We next determined the ability of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 to grow in response to a fresh nutrient supply added after prolonged culture. Organisms growing in saliva for 7 days were subcultured at a 1:50 dilution into fresh saliva. The organisms grew ∼2.0 log10 CFU/ml to reach ∼107 CFU/ml within 18 h. Together, these data indicate that serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 not only grew in human saliva to a cell density of ∼107 CFU/ml but also maintained the ability to proliferate in response to a fresh supply of saliva, even after a prolonged stationary phase.

Addition of glucose or control of pH did not alter the saliva growth phenotype.

Because the concentration of glucose in human saliva is only about 1% of that in blood or tissue, it has been suggested that the level of free glucose in saliva is insufficient to support bacterial cell division to values exceeding 1 × 107 CFU/ml (42, 48). We added exogenous glucose to saliva to achieve glucose levels equal to that found in human blood (100 mg/dl) but observed no difference in the maximum density of GAS (Fig. 2A). The normal pH of human saliva is between 6 and 7, and the presence of bicarbonate provides significant buffering capacity (25). The pH of the saliva during growth of GAS ranged between 6.5 and 7.5. We used exogenous bicarbonate to maintain the culture media between pH 7 and 7.1 but observed no difference in maximum growth achieved by GAS in the pH-stabilized saliva compared with saliva where no effort was made to control pH (Fig. 2A). Finally, we were able to filter a limited amount of saliva without adding DTT. Serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 grown in saliva filtered without DTT had no change in growth phenotype compared to results when the usual DTT-filtered saliva was used. Taken together, we conclude that glucose levels, pH, or the addition of DTT did not affect the growth phenotype of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in human saliva.

Prolonged stationary phase not observed in other laboratory media.

The steady, high-density persistence of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in saliva for at least 28 days was very unexpected. We studied the growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in nutrient-rich laboratory media (THY) and in nutrient-limited CDM. In both THY and CDM, there was a rapid decline of viable organisms after the first 24 h, and we were unable to detect viable organisms after more than 5 days (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that the interaction of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 with saliva led to the unusually prolonged stationary phase.

Growth of GAS in saliva leads to decreased killing by ampicillin.

To achieve a prolonged steady cell density during cultivation in saliva, serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 either had to closely balance cell death with cell renewal or had to enter a state of decreased cellular turnover. Given the limited nutrients available in saliva, we hypothesized that decreased cellular turnover was responsible for the prolonged stationary phase observed during growth in saliva. To test this hypothesis, we grew serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in saliva for 72 h and then added various concentrations of ampicillin, a drug which kills actively dividing cells. After 72 h of growth in saliva, the minimum bactericidal concentration of ampicillin was nearly 100-fold higher than that in either THY or CDM (Fig. 3). These data support our hypothesis that cultivation of GAS in saliva leads to diminished cellular turnover.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Time-kill analyses of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in various media. Bacteria were grown in saliva, THY, or CDM, and concentrations were adjusted to achieve a starting inoculum of ∼107 CFU/ml. Ampicillin was then added at indicated concentrations, and viable organisms were assessed by serial dilutions and plating onto BSA. Symbols: Saliva without ampicillin, ▪, solid line; saliva with 0.016 μg/ml ampicillin, ▾, dashed line; saliva with 0.512 μg/ml ampicillin, ▵, solid line; saliva with 1.024 μg/ml ampicillin, •, dashed line; THY with 0.016 ampicillin, □, solid line; CDM with 0.016 μg/ml ampicillin, ⧫, solid line. Bars represent standard deviations.

Growth of genetically diverse GAS strains in saliva.

To test the general applicability of our findings with serotype M1 strain MGAS5005, we studied four other serotype M1 strains with diverse origins (Table 1). We found that all five strains had similar growth phenotypes over 28 days (Fig. 2A). To study the applicability of our findings to GAS in general, we studied the growth of strains (Table 1) representing serotypes that commonly cause pharyngitis (M3, M6, M12, M28, and M77) and strains of serotypes that rarely cause pharyngitis (M9, M11, M33, M43, M73, and M94) (11, 21, 22, 49, 54). We hypothesized that the strains of serotypes that commonly caused pharyngitis would achieve higher maximum growth densities or persist for longer periods in human saliva than strains of serotypes that rarely cause pharyngitis.

All of the GAS strains tested grew in saliva medium B to a density of ∼107 CFU/ml within 24 h (Fig. 4A and B). However, the ability of various strains to persist in saliva varied markedly. The serotype M1 strains persisted at the highest levels, whereas the serotype M3, M9, M11, M12, M28, M33, M73, and M77 strains persisted at slightly lower densities, ∼5.5 × 105 CFU/ml (Fig. 4A and B). In addition, within about 10 days we detected no viable organisms for the serotype M6 strain JRS4 and the serotype M43 and M94 strains (Fig. 4B). The lack of persistence of the serotype M6 strain JRS4 was surprising in that M6 serotypes commonly cause pharyngitis whereas M43 and M94 serotype strains rarely cause pharyngitis. Strain JRS4 was isolated in 1971, and hence, we hypothesized that its prolonged time in laboratory conditions had rendered it less able to grow in saliva. We tested this hypothesis by growing two other serotype M6 strains that were recently isolated (Table 1) and found that these two strains had a prolonged stationary phase compared to JRS4 (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data show GAS strains of diverse serotypes generally achieve similar maximum densities during cultivation in saliva. There were some differences among the abilities of various GAS strains to persist in saliva, but we could draw no definitive correlation between the growth phenotype of a particular strain in saliva and the propensity of that strain's particular serotype to cause pharyngitis.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Growth curves of GAS strains in saliva. Growth was assayed by removing aliquots from saliva medium B at indicated time points and counting CFU after overnight incubation on BSA at 37°C in 5% CO2. (A) Growth curves for serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 (▪, solid line), serotype M3 strain MGAS315 (⧫, dashed line), serotype M6 strain MGAS9645 (○, solid line); serotype M12 strain MGAS9429 (□, dashed line), serotype M28 strain MGAS6180 (•, dashed line), serotype M33 strain MGAS9530 (▴, dashed line), and serotype M73 strain MGAS12083 (▵, solid line). (B) Growth curves for serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 (▪, solid line), serotype M6 strain JRS4 (⧫, dashed line), serotype M6 strain MGAS9645 (○, solid line), serotype M6 strain MGAS10287 (⋄, solid line), serotype M9 strain MGAS12487 (X, dashed line), serotype M43 strain MGAS9464 (▾, dashed line), and serotype M94 strain MGAS12349 (□, dashed line). Results for serotype M11 strain MGAS12292 and serotype M77 strain MGAS9482 overlapped with those for serotype M6 strains MGAS9645 and MGAS10282 and the serotype M9 strain MGAS12487 and are not graphed. Bars represent standard deviations.

Sic is necessary for optimum growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in human saliva.

Sic is an extracellular protein produced mainly by M1-serotype strains that binds to and inactivates antimicrobial peptides that are present in human saliva, such as lysozyme and β-defensins (13-16). We hypothesized that production of Sic by M1 strains was necessary for optimum growth in human saliva. Sic was produced by serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 during all phases of growth in saliva (Fig. 5). We compared the growth in saliva of an sic isogenic mutant strain with its parental wild-type strain. The sic isogenic mutant strain had decreased growth within 2 h, and its density remained lower over the entire observation period (Fig. 6; Table 2). Addition of recombinant Sic to saliva at physiologic concentrations (5 μg/ml) (16) restored the growth density to wild-type levels (Fig. 6). Taken together, we conclude that Sic is required for the optimum growth in saliva of serotype M1 MGAS5005.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Western immunoblots showing production of GAS extracellular proteins during growth in saliva. GAS strains were grown in saliva medium B for 4 h, 8 h, and 16 h (corresponding to early exponential, late exponential, and early stationary phase). Proteins present in the supernatant were precipitated, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were probed with primary rabbit antibody (1:10,000) specific for each protein and secondary antibody (1:2,500) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Reactivity was visualized with chemiluminescent reagents. Saliva without GAS added was used as a negative control, and the purified protein of interest served as a positive control. Sic was assayed during growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005; SlaA was assayed during growth of serotype M3 strain MGAS315; SpeB was assayed during growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 at 4, 8, and 16 h as well as at 7 days and 28 days. The degradation of Sic observed at 16 h has been reported previously (15). N.D., not done.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Growth of GAS sic and speB isogenic mutant strains in saliva. Growth was assayed by removing aliquots from saliva medium B at indicated time points and counting CFU after overnight incubation on BSA at 37°C in 5% CO2. Recombinant Sic and SpeB were added to culture medium as described in Materials and Methods to assess complementation. Symbols: wild-type serotype M1 strain MGAS5005, ▪, solid line; isogenic sic mutant strains, ▾, dashed line; isogenic sic mutant strain with recombinant Sic, ⧫, solid line; isogenic speB mutant strain, ▴, dashed line; isogenic speB mutant strain with recombinant SpeB, □, solid line. Bars represent standard deviations.

TABLE 2.

Growth of isogenic mutant GAS strains in salivaa

Name or SPy no.i of mutated gene Gene productb Maximum cell densityc P valued Cell density at 168 he P valued Reference
Wild-type MGAS5005 NAh 6.87 ± 0.07 NA 6.49 ± 0.07 NA 35
sic Streptococcal inhibitor of complement 6.02 ± 0.07 <0.001 5.58 ± 0.16 <0.001 23
speB Extracellular cysteine protease 6.91 ± 0.10 1.00 4.66 ± 0.18 <0.001 38
mac Immune modulating protein 6.84 ± 0.11 1.00 6.56 ± 0.13 1.00 30
SlaAf Streptococcal phospholipase A2 7.13 ± 0.21 1.00 6.08 ± 0.12 1.00 41
SPy2191 Extracellular protein 6.95 ± 0.05 1.00 6.53 ± 0.10 1.00 57
covR (csrR) TCS response regulator 6.92 ± 0.04 1.00 6.71 ± 0.07 0.420 17
ihkg TCS response regulator 7.25 ± 0.08 1.00 5.34 ± .30 1.00 57
SPy1062 TCS response regulator 6.76 ± 0.16 1.00 6.65 ± 0.03 0.781 44
SPy1106 TCS response regulator 6.67 ± 0.14 1.00 6.57 ± 0.09 1.00 44
SPy1198 Repressor protein 6.43 ± 0.10 0.10 6.54 ± 0.16 1.00 This study
SPy1556 TCS response regulator 6.83 ± 0.16 1.00 6.52 ± 0.11 1.00 44
SPy1587 TCS response regulator 6.72 ± 0.09 1.00 6.52 ± 0.08 1.00 17
SPy1634 Transcriptional regulator 6.69 ± 0.08 1.00 6.48 ± 0.07 1.00 This study
SPy1960 Transcriptional regulator 6.73 ± 0.10 1.00 6.56 ± 0.08 1.00 This study
SPy2053 Transcriptional regulator 6.57 ± 0.18 1.00 6.11 ± 0.19 1.00 This study
SPy2074 Transcriptional regulator 6.63 ± 0.18 1.00 6.74 ± 0.07 0.51 This paper
a

Growth was assayed in saliva medium B; numbers of CFU were determined by plating serial dilutions.

b

TCS, two-component system.

c

Highest density (log10 CFU/ml) achieved during incubation.

d

P value for comparison with wild-type strain as determined by paired Student's t-test with Bonferroni's adjustment for multiple comparisons.

e

Log10 CFU/ml, determined at 168 h.

f

SlaA mutant strain was compared with its parent strain, MGAS315.

g

ihk mutant strain was compared with its parent strain, JRS4.

h

NA, not applicable.

i

SPy no., Streptococcus pyogenes gene number.

SpeB is necessary for optimum growth of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 and serotype M6 strain JRS4 in human saliva.

SpeB is another GAS extracellular protein that inactivates antimicrobial peptides present in saliva (47). Unlike Sic, SpeB is produced by a wide variety of GAS serotypes, although extracellular SpeB activity levels have been reported to be highly variable (27, 52). We hypothesized that SpeB production would be needed for optimal growth in saliva. Serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 produced SpeB in a time-dependent fashion during growth in saliva (Fig. 5). We examined SpeB production during growth in saliva for each of the GAS strains studied (Table 3). Strains that were able to persist in saliva beyond 7 days produced detectable amounts of SpeB, whereas strains that did not persist in saliva did not produce detectable amounts of SpeB.

TABLE 3.

Extracellular protein production by GAS strains during growth in human salivaa

Protein Function Strain assayed (M serotype) Presence of immunoreactive material
4 h 8 h 16 h
Sic Inhibitor of phagocytosis and killing MGAS5005 (M1) + + +/−
Mac Inhibitor of opsonophagocytosis MGAS5005 (M1) + + +
MGAS315 (M3) + +
MGAS6180 (M28) + +
SpeA Superantigen (scarlet fever toxin) MGAS5005 (M1) + +
MGAS315 (M3) + +
SpeB Secreted cysteine protease MGAS5005 (M1) +
MGAS315 (M3) + +
JRS4 (M6) ND ND
MGAS9645 (M6) ND ND +
MGAS10287 (M6) ND ND +
MGAS12487 (M9) ND ND +
MGAS12292 (M11) ND ND +
MGAS9429 (M12) ND ND +
MGAS6180 (M28) +
MGAS9530 (M33) ND ND +
MGAS9464 (M43) ND ND
MGAS12083 (M73) ND ND +
MGAS9482 (M77) ND ND +
MGAS12349 (M94) ND ND
SlaA Secreted phospholipase A2 MGAS315 (M3) + + +
MGAS6180 (M28) + + +
SPy2191 Unknown MGAS5005 (M1) + +
MGAS315 (M3) + + +
MGAS6180 (M28) + +
a

Presence of immunoreactive material assayed by Western immunoblotting. +, reactivity detected; −, reactivity not detected; +/−, indeterminate; ND, not done.

A speB isogenic mutant strain was used to directly test the contribution of SpeB to persistence in saliva. Similar to the sic isogenic mutant strain, we observed decreased persistence of the speB isogenic mutant strain compared to the wild type (Fig. 6). Persistence of the mutant was restored to wild-type levels by the addition of purified SpeB to saliva. We next added purified SpeB to saliva in which the non-SpeB-producing serotype M6 strain JRS4 was growing. Following the addition of exogenous SpeB, JRS4 had a prolonged stationary phase similar to that of the SpeB-producing serotype M6 strain MGAS10287 (data not shown). Taken together, these data indicated that SpeB production is needed for optimum persistence of GAS during growth in saliva.

GAS produces a variety of extracellular virulence factors during growth in saliva.

Having found that Sic and SpeB were produced during growth in saliva, we hypothesized that other proven and putative extracellular virulence proteins were produced by GAS during cultivation in saliva. Using Western immunoblot analysis, we found growth-phase-dependent production of several known and putative GAS virulence factors, such as streptococcal Mac protein (Mac), streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SpeA), streptococcal phospholipase A2 (SlaA), and SPy2191. In light of our earlier findings with the sic and speB isogenic mutant strains, we also examined the growth of mac, SlaA, and SPy2191 isogenic mutant strains. We found that the mac, SlaA, and SPy2191 isogenic mutant strains and their parental wild-type strains had similar growth phenotypes (Table 2). Taken together with the Sic and SpeB protein production data, we conclude that during growth in saliva, GAS elaborates a wide range of extracellular proteins, at least two of which directly impact the ability of the organism to grow and persist in saliva.

Evaluation of effect of transcriptional regulators on growth of GAS in saliva.

The entry of GAS into a prolonged stationary phase following growth in saliva combined with our finding of growth-phase-dependent production of multiple virulence factors suggests that GAS sensed and responded to the environmental conditions it encountered in saliva. To better understand how GAS altered its gene regulation during interaction with saliva, we studied the growth pattern of 11 isogenic mutant strains with deletions in various known and putative transcriptional regulators (17, 44, 57; unpublished data). In previous work, no apparent differences were identified in the growth of these isogenic mutant strains in THY compared to that of the wild type (17, 44, 57). All of the 11 isogenic mutant strains studied here had growth phenotypes similar to that of their parental wild-type strain in terms of maximum growth achieved and the ability to persist during the stationary phase (Table 2). We conclude that the 11 transcriptional regulators we studied are not crucial for maximal growth or persistence of serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 in human saliva.

DISCUSSION

Growth of GAS in human saliva.

The interaction of GAS with saliva is crucial for the establishment of pharyngitis and the subsequent transmission of infectious organisms (19, 20, 26, 46). Although human saliva is known to support the growth of oral streptococci, little is known about molecular processes contributing to the growth of GAS in this fluid (4, 8, 9, 42). We established that GAS grew to a density of ∼107 CFU/ml of saliva, a finding that is very similar to that observed for Streptococcus gordonii (42). The ability of GAS to grow in human saliva to this density is consistent with reported densities of 5 × 106 organisms per milliliter of saliva in patients with symptomatic GAS pharyngitis (19, 26, 46).

The factors limiting the growth of GAS in human saliva in vitro and in vivo are not understood. It has been suggested that the level of free glucose in saliva is not sufficient to support cell division of oral streptococci to values exceeding 1 × 107 CFU/ml (42). However, similar to other investigators, we found that the addition of glucose did not increase the density of organisms, suggesting that the concentration of glucose alone is not likely to be a limiting factor for growth (9). We also found that pH or the addition of DTT did not affect the maximum growth achieved in vitro.

The ability of human saliva to restrict the density of microorganisms such as GAS to ∼107 CFU/ml is in striking contrast to the growth-promoting ability of other body fluids. Bacteria growing in blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid can reach densities of 109 CFU/ml and higher (7, 29, 45). The presence of multiple antimicrobial peptides and the limited nutrients available in saliva for the growth of microorganisms likely contribute to this phenomenon (1, 25). The observation that saliva limits microbial proliferation confirms the fundamental contribution of saliva to innate immune defense of the human oropharynx.

The persistence in saliva for at least 28 days at near-maximal growth levels of all serotype M1 strains studied was very unexpected (Fig. 2). This persistence contrasted with our findings, also observed by other investigators (53), that in nutrient-rich media (THY) and in nutrient-limited media (CDM), GAS had a rapid decrease in viable organisms after reaching stationary phase. We speculate that when a cell density of ∼1 × 107 CFU/ml is reached in saliva, GAS enters a state of restricted metabolic activity, thereby allowing persistence at a relatively high density, a phenomenon which would be expected to enhance the likelihood of transmission to a new host. The idea of restricted metabolic activity (and presumably decreased cell wall turnover) is supported by the observation that during the stationary phase in saliva, GAS had decreased susceptibility to killing by ampicillin.

Growth and persistence of GAS strains in saliva.

Although there is significant geographic variation in the relative frequency of pharyngitis caused by distinct M-protein serotypes, several M types tend to predominate in many areas (21, 49). For example, serotype M1 strains are the leading cause of GAS pharyngitis in many studies (11, 49). Thus, it is noteworthy that we found that serotype M1 strains persisted in saliva at higher densities and for longer periods than did the strains of all other serotypes studied. We speculate that the persistence of serotype M1 strains in human saliva contributes to the prevalent nature of serotype M1 strains as a cause of pharyngitis. It is possible that the production of Sic by these strains is an important factor in this regard (see below).

Overall, we did not observe a simple relationship between the magnitude of persistence in saliva and reported abundance of a GAS serotype in human infections. For example, strains of serotypes that rarely cause pharyngitis, such as M9, M11, and M33, persisted at levels similar to those of strains of serotypes that often cause pharyngitis. The difficulty of using individual strains to generally characterize a serotype is illustrated by our results with the M6 serotype strains, where there were marked differences in the abilities of individual strains to persist in saliva. Taken together, our results suggest that the growth and persistence of a GAS strain of a particular serotype in human saliva are not alone sufficient to account for that serotype's relative abundance in pharyngitis cases, although they may contribute. It will be important to investigate this issue with a larger sample of GAS strains.

The role of Sic and SpeB in the growth of GAS in human saliva.

GAS elaborates at least two extracellular proteins, SpeB and Sic, that have been shown to inhibit or inactivate the purified forms of antimicrobial peptides present in saliva (13, 14, 16, 47). Sic is produced mainly by serotype M1 strains, whereas virtually all strains have the speB gene, although protein expression levels are variable (16, 27, 52). Sic appears to function through binding inhibition, whereas the cysteine protease SpeB can actively degrade peptides involved in innate immunity (14, 47). We tested the hypothesis that the activities of SpeB and Sic contributed to the ability of GAS to proliferate in saliva, using isogenic mutant strains in which SpeB and Sic were not produced. Both the sic and speB isogenic mutant strains had decreased growth in human saliva, and this deficiency was reversed by the addition of the respective purified protein to the culture medium. Moreover, GAS strains that failed to persist in saliva did not produce detectable amounts of SpeB during culture in saliva. Inactivation of Sic has previously been shown to lead to a decreased ability of GAS to colonize the mouse oropharynx (35). Our results suggest that the failure of the sic mutant strain to successfully colonize the oropharynx may have been due in part to its inability to persist at high levels in saliva. Taken together, we conclude that Sic and SpeB are crucial to a successful GAS interaction with human saliva.

GAS extracellular protein production during growth in saliva.

Having established a role for Sic and SpeB for GAS-saliva interaction, we next sought to determine if GAS secreted other extracellular proteins during growth in saliva. We found that several proven and putative extracellular virulence proteins (e.g., SpeA, Mac, SlaA, and SPy2191) were produced during growth in human saliva (Table 2). Moreover, these proteins were produced in a growth-phase-dependent fashion, suggesting that transcriptional regulation of GAS virulence factor production occurred during growth in saliva.

Taken altogether, our results shed new light on a key early event in the life cycle of GAS, namely, the interaction between GAS and human saliva. Recent reports have documented upregulation of several GAS genes in response to contact with human epithelial cells in vitro, another important event in the life cycle of this pathogen (2, 5, 6, 41). However, by showing that GAS responded in a complex fashion to growth in human saliva, our results suggest that molecular processes that enhance colonization and survival in the upper respiratory tract of humans are well under way before the organism reaches the epithelial cell surface. Thus, further study of GAS-saliva interaction is likely to provide new insights into the molecular strategies used by this common human pathogen to successfully colonize the human oropharynx, produce disease, and disseminate to a new host.

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Nagiec for providing SlaA antibody and purified protein, Robert Burne and Robert Atmar for critical comments, and Iman Abdi for technical assistance.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, grant U01-AI60595 to J.M.M.

Editor: D. L. Burns

REFERENCES

  • 1.Amerongen, A. V., and E. C. Veerman. 2002. Saliva—-the defender of the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 8:12-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banks, D. J., B. Lei, and J. M. Musser. 2003. Prophage induction and expression of prophage-encoded virulence factors in group A Streptococcus serotype M3 strain MGAS315. Infect. Immun. 71:7079-7086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bisno, A. L. 2001. Acute pharyngitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:205-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blehert, D. S., R. J. Palmer, Jr., J. B. Xavier, J. S. Almeida, and P. E. Kolenbrander. 2003. Autoinducer 2 production by Streptococcus gordonii DL1 and the biofilm phenotype of a luxS mutant are influenced by nutritional conditions. J. Bacteriol. 185:4851-4860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Broudy, T. B., V. Pancholi, and V. A. Fischetti. 2002. The in vitro interaction of Streptococcus pyogenes with human pharyngeal cells induces a phage-encoded extracellular DNase. Infect. Immun. 70:2805-2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Broudy, T. B., V. Pancholi, and V. A. Fischetti. 2001. Induction of lysogenic bacteriophage and phage-associated toxin from group A streptococci during coculture with human pharyngeal cells. Infect. Immun. 69:1440-1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davis, C. P., S. Weinberg, M. D. Anderson, G. M. Rao, and M. M. Warren. 1989. Effects of microamperage, medium, and bacterial concentration on iontophoretic killing of bacteria in fluid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:442-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Jong, M. H., J. S. van der Hoeven, O. J. van, and J. H. Olijve. 1984. Growth of oral Streptococcus species and Actinomyces viscosus in human saliva. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47:901-904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Jong, M. H., J. S. Van der Hoeven, and J. H. Van Os. 1986. Growth of micro-organisms from supragingival dental plaque on saliva agar. J. Dent. Res. 65:85-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenberg, M. J. 1993. Rheumatic heart disease in the developing world: prevalence, prevention, and control. Eur. Heart J. 14:122-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Espinosa, L. E., Z. Li, D. Gomez Barreto, E. Calderon Jaimes, R. S. Rodriguez, V. Sakota, R. R. Facklam, and B. Beall. 2003. M protein gene type distribution among group A streptococcal clinical isolates recovered in Mexico City, Mexico, from 1991 to 2000, and Durango, Mexico, from 1998 to 1999: overlap with type distribution within the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:373-378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Federle, M. J., K. S. McIver, and J. R. Scott. 1999. A response regulator that represses transcription of several virulence operons in the group A Streptococcus. J. Bacteriol. 181:3649-3657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fernie-King, B. A., D. J. Seilly, A. Davies, and P. J. Lachmann. 2002. Streptococcal inhibitor of complement inhibits two additional components of the mucosal innate immune system: secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor and lysozyme. Infect. Immun. 70:4908-4916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernie-King, B. A., D. J. Seilly, and P. J. Lachmann. 2004. The interaction of streptococcal inhibitor of complement (SIC) and its proteolytic fragments with the human beta defensins. Immunology 111:444-452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fernie-King, B. A., D. J. Seilly, C. Willers, R. Wurzner, A. Davies, and P. J. Lachmann. 2001. Streptococcal inhibitor of complement (SIC) inhibits the membrane attack complex by preventing uptake of C567 onto cell membranes. Immunology 103:390-398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frick, I. M., P. Akesson, M. Rasmussen, A. Schmidtchen, and L. Bjorck. 2003. SIC, a secreted protein of Streptococcus pyogenes that inactivates antibacterial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16561-16566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Graham, M. R., L. M. Smoot, C. A. Migliaccio, K. Virtaneva, D. E. Sturdevant, S. F. Porcella, M. J. Federle, G. J. Adams, J. R. Scott, and J. M. Musser. 2002. Virulence control in group A Streptococcus by a two-component gene regulatory system: global expression profiling and in vivo infection modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13855-13860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hamburger, M. 1944. Studies on the transmission of hemolytic streptococcus infections. I: Cross infections in army hospital wards. J. Infect. Dis. 75:58-70. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hamburger, M. 1944. Studies on the transmission of hemolytic streptococcus infections: II. Beta hemolytic streptococci in the saliva of persons with positive throat cultures. J. Infect. Dis. 75:71-78. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hamburger, M., and O. Robertson. 1948. Expulsion of group A hemolytic streptococci in droplets and droplet nuclei by sneezing, coughing, and talking. Am. J. Med. 1948:690-701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haukness, H. A., R. R. Tanz, R. B. Thomson, Jr., D. K. Pierry, E. L. Kaplan, B. Beall, D. Johnson, N. P. Hoe, J. M. Musser, and S. T. Shulman. 2002. The heterogeneity of endemic community pediatric group A streptococcal pharyngeal isolates and their relationship to invasive isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 185:915-920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hoe, N. P., K. E. Fullerton, M. Liu, J. E. Peters, G. D. Gackstetter, G. J. Adams, and J. M. Musser. 2003. Molecular genetic analysis of 675 group A Streptococcus isolates collected in a carrier study at Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas. J. Infect. Dis. 188:818-827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoe, N. P., R. M. Ireland, F. R. DeLeo, B. B. Gowen, D. W. Dorward, J. M. Voyich, M. Liu, E. H. Burns, Jr., D. M. Culnan, A. Bretscher, and J. M. Musser. 2002. Insight into the molecular basis of pathogen abundance: group A Streptococcus inhibitor of complement inhibits bacterial adherence and internalization into human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7646-7651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hoe, N. P., K. Nakashima, S. Lukomski, D. Grigsby, M. Liu, P. Kordari, S. J. Dou, X. Pan, J. Vuopio-Varkila, S. Salmelinna, A. McGeer, D. E. Low, B. Schwartz, A. Schuchat, S. Naidich, D. De Lorenzo, Y. X. Fu, and J. M. Musser. 1999. Rapid selection of complement-inhibiting protein variants in group A Streptococcus epidemic waves. Nat. Med. 5:924-929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Humphrey, S. P., and R. T. Williamson. 2001. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J. Prosthet. Dent. 85:162-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaplan, E. L., R. Couser, B. B. Huwe, C. McKay, and L. W. Wannamaker. 1979. Significance of quantitative salivary cultures for group A and non-group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in patients with pharyngitis and in their family contacts. Pediatrics 64:904-912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kapur, V., S. Topouzis, M. W. Majesky, L. L. Li, M. R. Hamrick, R. J. Hamill, J. M. Patti, and J. M. Musser. 1993. A conserved Streptococcus pyogenes extracellular cysteine protease cleaves human fibronectin and degrades vitronectin. Microb. Pathog. 15:327-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar, P., S. Garhwal, and V. Chaudhary. 1992. Rheumatic heart disease: a school survey in a rural area of Rajasthan. Indian Heart J. 44:245-246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lefort, A., J. Pavie, L. Garry, F. Chau, and B. Fantin. 2004. Activities of dalbavancin in vitro and in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus with or without reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1061-1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lei, B., F. R. DeLeo, N. P. Hoe, M. R. Graham, S. M. Mackie, R. L. Cole, M. Liu, H. R. Hill, D. E. Low, M. J. Federle, J. R. Scott, and J. M. Musser. 2001. Evasion of human innate and acquired immunity by a bacterial homolog of CD11b that inhibits opsonophagocytosis. Nat. Med. 7:1298-1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lei, B., M. Liu, J. M. Voyich, C. I. Prater, S. V. Kala, F. R. DeLeo, and J. M. Musser. 2003. Identification and characterization of HtsA, a second heme-binding protein made by Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Immun. 71:5962-5969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lei, B., S. Mackie, S. Lukomski, and J. M. Musser. 2000. Identification and immunogenicity of group A Streptococcus culture supernatant proteins. Infect. Immun. 68:6807-6818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ligtenberg, T. J., F. J. Bikker, J. Groenink, I. Tornoe, R. Leth-Larsen, E. C. Veerman, A. V. Nieuw Amerongen, and U. Holmskov. 2001. Human salivary agglutinin binds to lung surfactant protein-D and is identical with scavenger receptor protein gp-340. Biochem. J. 359:243-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lukomski, S., E. H. Burns, Jr., P. R. Wyde, A. Podbielski, J. Rurangirwa, D. K. Moore-Poveda, and J. M. Musser. 1998. Genetic inactivation of an extracellular cysteine protease (SpeB) expressed by Streptococcus pyogenes decreases resistance to phagocytosis and dissemination to organs. Infect. Immun. 66:771-776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lukomski, S., N. P. Hoe, I. Abdi, J. Rurangirwa, P. Kordari, M. Liu, S. J. Dou, G. G. Adams, and J. M. Musser. 2000. Nonpolar inactivation of the hypervariable streptococcal inhibitor of complement gene (sic) in serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes significantly decreases mouse mucosal colonization. Infect. Immun. 68:535-542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lukomski, S., C. A. Montgomery, J. Rurangirwa, R. S. Geske, J. P. Barrish, G. J. Adams, and J. M. Musser. 1999. Extracellular cysteine protease produced by Streptococcus pyogenes participates in the pathogenesis of invasive skin infection and dissemination in mice. Infect. Immun. 67:1779-1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lukomski, S., K. Nakashima, I. Abdi, V. J. Cipriano, R. M. Ireland, S. D. Reid, G. G. Adams, and J. M. Musser. 2000. Identification and characterization of the scl gene encoding a group A Streptococcus extracellular protein virulence factor with similarity to human collagen. Infect. Immun. 68:6542-6553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lukomski, S., S. Sreevatsan, C. Amberg, W. Reichardt, M. Woischnik, A. Podbielski, and J. M. Musser. 1997. Inactivation of Streptococcus pyogenes extracellular cysteine protease significantly decreases mouse lethality of serotype M3 and M49 strains. J. Clin. Investig. 99:2574-2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marcotte, H., and M. C. Lavoie. 1998. Oral microbial ecology and the role of salivary immunoglobulin A. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:71-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Musser, J., and R. Krause. 1998. The revival of group A streptococcal disease, with a commentary on staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, p. 185-218. In R. Krause (ed.), Emerging Infections. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
  • 41.Nagiec, M. J., B. Lei, S. K. Parker, M. L. Vasil, M. Matsumoto, R. M. Ireland, S. B. Beres, N. P. Hoe, and J. M. Musser. 2004. Analysis of a novel prophage-encoded group A Streptococcus extracellular phospholipase A2. J. Biol. Chem. 279:45909-45918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Palmer, R. J., Jr., K. Kazmerzak, M. C. Hansen, and P. E. Kolenbrander. 2001. Mutualism versus independence: strategies of mixed-species oral biofilms in vitro using saliva as the sole nutrient source. Infect. Immun. 69:5794-5804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peter, G., and A. L. Smith. 1977. Group A streptococcal infections of the skin and pharynx (second of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 297:365-370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ribardo, D. A., T. J. Lambert, and K. S. McIver. 2004. Role of Streptococcus pyogenes two-component response regulators in the temporal control of Mga and the Mga-regulated virulence gene emm. Infect. Immun. 72:3668-3673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodriguez-Cerrato, V., C. C. McCoig, I. C. Michelow, F. Ghaffar, H. S. Jafri, R. D. Hardy, C. Patel, K. Olsen, and G. H. McCracken, Jr. 2001. Pharmacodynamics and bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin in experimental Escherichia coli meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3092-3097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ross, P. W. 1971. Beta-haemolytic streptococci in saliva. J. Hyg. (London) 69:347-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schmidtchen, A., I. M. Frick, E. Andersson, H. Tapper, and L. Bjorck. 2002. Proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria degrade and inactivate the antibacterial peptide LL-37. Mol. Microbiol. 46:157-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schumann, G. B. 1994. Clinical utility of body fluid analyses: an overview. Clin. Lab. Sci. 7:28-31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shulman, S. T., R. R. Tanz, W. Kabat, K. Kabat, E. Cederlund, D. Patel, Z. Li, V. Sakota, J. B. Dale, and B. Beall. 2004. Group A streptococcal pharyngitis serotype surveillance in North America, 2000-2002. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:325-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smoot, L. M., J. C. Smoot, M. R. Graham, G. A. Somerville, D. E. Sturdevant, C. A. Migliaccio, G. L. Sylva, and J. M. Musser. 2001. Global differential gene expression in response to growth temperature alteration in group A Streptococcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10416-10421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sumby, P., S. F. Porcella, A. G. Madrigal, K. D. Barbian, K. Virtaneva, S. M. Ricklefs, D. E. Sturdevant, M. R. Graham, J. Vuopio-Varkila, N. P. Hoe, and J. M. Musser. Evolution and emergence of a highly successful clone of serotype M1 group A Streptococcus involved multiple horizontal gene transfer events. J. Infect. Dis., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 52.Svensson, M. D., D. A. Scaramuzzino, U. Sjobring, A. Olsen, C. Frank, and D. E. Bessen. 2000. Role for a secreted cysteine proteinase in the establishment of host tissue tropism by group A streptococci. Mol. Microbiol. 38:242-253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Trainor, V. C., R. K. Udy, P. J. Bremer, and G. M. Cook. 1999. Survival of Streptococcus pyogenes under stress and starvation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 176:421-428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tyrrell, G. J., M. Lovgren, B. Forwick, N. P. Hoe, J. M. Musser, and J. A. Talbot. 2002. M types of group A streptococcal isolates submitted to the National Centre for Streptococcus (Canada) from 1993 to 1999. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4466-4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Virtaneva, K., M. R. Graham, S. F. Porcella, N. P. Hoe, H. Su, E. A. Graviss, T. J. Gardner, J. E. Allison, W. J. Lemon, J. R. Bailey, M. J. Parnell, and J. M. Musser. 2003. Group A Streptococcus gene expression in humans and cynomolgus macaques with acute pharyngitis. Infect. Immun. 71:2199-2207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vise, P. D., K. Kodali, N. Hoe, A. Paszczynski, J. M. Musser, and G. W. Daughdrill. 2003. Stable isotope labeling of a group A Streptococcus virulence factor using a chemically defined growth medium. Protein Expr. Purif. 32:232-238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Voyich, J. M., D. E. Sturdevant, K. R. Braughton, S. D. Kobayashi, B. Lei, K. Virtaneva, D. W. Dorward, J. M. Musser, and F. R. DeLeo. 2003. Genome-wide protective response used by group A Streptococcus to evade destruction by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1996-2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wannamaker, L. W. 1954. The epidemiology of streptococcal infections, p. 157-175. In M. McCarthy (ed.), Streptococcal infections. Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y.

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES