“Pigweed” is a simple word that can strike fear in the heart of many farmers. Amaranthus palmeri, also known as Palmer amaranth, is one of the most difficult pigweeds to control, thriving in cotton, corn, and soybean fields and outcompeting the crops for nutrients, water, and sunlight. This monster-sized weed is fast-growing, massively reproductive, and can cause up to 90% yield loss throughout the United States in certain row crops (Massinga et al. 2001).
Glyphosate, the active ingredient in RoundUp, was introduced in the 1970s. At first, it was only good for bare-ground type applications when control of all green plants was desired. However, the introduction of RoundUp Ready crops in the 1990s led to it being the most commonly used herbicide in row crops in the US. Palmer amaranth was kept at bay by broadcast application of the RoundUp brand of glyphosate. However, after about 10 years, some populations of Palmer amaranth began to evolve resistance to glyphosate (Culpepper et al. 2006). How did this happen?
Scientists who studied these glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth accessions discovered that the plant's DNA contains large, self-replicating extra-chromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) in addition to the normal chromosomes (Koo et al. 2018; Molin et al. 2020). The eccDNA harbors the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene, which encodes for the EPSPS protein that glyphosate targets. The EPSPS gene in eccDNA is from its own genome in Palmer amaranth. Susceptible Palmer amaranth has only 1 copy of EPSPS in its genome, and therefore the base level of EPSPS protein in susceptible plants is sufficiently inhibited by field rates of glyphosate. However, the eccDNA-containing Palmer amaranth can survive glyphosate treatment because it has dozens or even hundreds of eccDNA copies, each contributing to a greatly increased EPSPS protein pool. The amount of glyphosate needed to inhibit EPSPS is directly correlated with the size of the EPSPS protein pool. Therefore, by retaining enough copies of EPSPS, the Palmer amaranth becomes resistant to typical field doses of glyphosate treatment (Gaines et al. 2010).
One of the reasons that Palmer amaranth became the most problematic weed in the US is its ability to rapidly evolve herbicide resistance. Rampant glyphosate resistance has forced farmers to use alternative herbicides to fight back Palmer pigweed. With the commercialization of glufosinate-resistant crops, glufosinate-ammonium became an important alternative herbicide for Palmer amaranth control. This herbicide inhibits the enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS), which has 2 isoforms in plants: GS1 and GS2 (McNally et al. 1983). Not surprisingly, Palmer amaranth has begun evolving resistance after recurrent application of glufosinate-ammonium (Carvalho-Moore et al. 2022; Noguera et al. 2022; Priess et al. 2022). Furthermore, previous studies have revealed GS2 amplification in Palmer amaranth, similar to what was seen 20 years ago with glyphosate (Carvalho-Moore et al. 2022; Noguera et al. 2022). However, the mechanisms of glufosinate-ammonium resistance are still under investigation.
In their new work, Carvalho-Moore and colleagues (Carvalho-Moore et al. 2025) used PacBio HiFi long read resequencing, digital PCR, and molecular markers to uncover the specific genomic structural variant responsible for GS2 amplification. The authors discovered that some of the eccDNAs in an A. palmeri accession (MSR2) resistant to both glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium now also included the GS2 gene beside the original EPSPS gene. The novel eccDNA is about 26 kb longer than the previously identified eccDNA in A. palmeri. The 2 eccDNAs share high similarity and synteny, but a region in the original eccDNA has been replaced with a locus containing tandemly duplicated GS2 isoforms along with other genes in the genome (Figure).
Figure.
Palmer amaranth's arsenal. Susceptible Palmer pigweed contains no eccDNA. Glyphosate-resistant plants contain eccDNA with the EPSPS gene. In a new study, a novel eccDNA containing both EPSPS and 2 GS2 isoforms, GS2.1 and GS2.2, confers resistance to both glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium. Figure created by Y-H. Hung using BioRender.
In addition, the authors found that both the original eccDNA (with only EPSPS) and the newly discovered eccDNA (with EPSPS and GS2.1/GS2.2) were present in the same individual plant, indicating that both eccDNAs coexist and independently replicate (Figure). MSR2 plants carrying both versions of eccDNA have 6 times the sequencing read depth for the EPSPS region compared with plants carrying eccDNA with only EPSPS. This indicates an additive copy number amplification for EPSPS between the 2 eccDNA replicons.
A second A. palmeri accession called MSR1, also resistant to glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium, was used to further investigate GS2 gene amplification. Comparison of the copy number of GS2 isoforms between MSR1 and MSR2 accessions showed different patterns of GS2 amplification. The MSR1 showed amplification of EPSPS and GS2.1 only, and their copy number amount was independent/unlinked, while the MSR2 showed amplification of EPSPS and both GS2.1 and GS2.2 isoforms and that the GS2 and EPSPS genes were physically linked. This result suggested the presence of a third yet-to-be-identified eccDNA containing only GS2.2 in MSR2.
The discovery of this eccDNA variant in A. palmeri that confers dual resistance to glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium highlights the remarkable adaptability of Palmer pigweed. This finding also unveils that Palmer amaranth can expand its arsenal against different herbicides through eccDNA. While herbicide resistance is an easily observed phenotype and therefore one that can be studied, eccDNAs may exist for many other important traits that are harder to detect. Circular DNA is found across all kingdoms and in some tissues like cancer, suggesting that it plays a fundamental role in cells and can alter cell and organism phenotype for many traits (Noer et al. 2022). Further research into the genetics and molecular components of eccDNAs in pigweed could provide models for developing more effective weed management strategies or mechanisms to reverse herbicide resistance.
Recent related articles in The Plant Cell
Molin et al. (2020) discovered a massive extrachromosomal circular DNA that harbors the EPSPS gene and 58 other genes whose encoded functions traverse detoxification, replication, recombination, transposition, tethering, and transport in A. palmeri.
Paterson and Queitsch (2024) reviewed the interplay between angiosperm genome organization and botanical diversity.
Yaschenko et al. (2024) highlighted the utility and challenges of using Arabidopsis as a reference for applied plant biology research, including herbicide resistance studies.
References
- Carvalho-Moore P, Borgato EA, Luan C, Aimone P, Ingo M, Jens L, Norsworthy JK, Patterson EL. A novel genomic rearrangement in the Amaranthus palmeri eccDNA provides dual herbicide resistance to glyphosate and glufosinate. Plant Cell. 2025:koaf069. 10.1093/plcell/koaf069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho-Moore P, Norsworthy JK, González-Torralva F, Hwang J-I, Patel JD, Barber LT, Butts TR, McElroy JS. Unraveling the mechanism of resistance in a glufosinate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accession. Weed Sci. 2022:70(4):370–379. 10.1017/wsc.2022.31 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, York AC, Davis JW, Hanna HW. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 2006:54(4):620–626. 10.1614/ws-06-001r.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gaines TA, Zhang W, Wang D, Bukun B, Chisholm ST, Shaner DL, Nissen SJ, Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ, Culpepper AS, et al. Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010:107(3):1029–1034. 10.1073/pnas.0906649107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koo D-H, Molin WT, Saski CA, Jiang J, Putta K, Jugulam M, Friebe B, Gill BS. Extrachromosomal circular DNA-based amplification and transmission of herbicide resistance in crop weed Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018:115(13):3332–3337. 10.1073/pnas.1719354115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massinga RA, Currie RS, Horak MJ, Boyer J. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 2001:62(2):202–208. 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0202:iopaic]2.0.co;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McNally SF, Hirel B, Stewart GR. Nitrogen metabolism in halophytes v. The occurrence of multiple forms of glutamine synthetase in leaf tissue. New Phytol. 1983:94(1):47–56. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb02720.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Molin WT, Yaguchi A, Blenner M, Saski CA. The eccDNA replicon: a heritable, extra-nuclear vehicle that enables gene amplification and glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Plant Cell. 2020:32(7):2132–2140. 10.1105/tpc.20.00099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noer JB, Hørsdal OK, Xiang X, Luo Y, Regenberg B. Extrachromosomal circular DNA in cancer: history, current knowledge, and methods. Trends Genet. 2022:38(7):766–781. 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noguera MM, Porri A, Werle IS, Heiser J, Brändle F, Lerchl J, Murphy B, Betz M, Gatzmann F, Penkert M, et al. Involvement of glutamine synthetase 2 (GS2) amplification and overexpression in Amaranthus palmeri resistance to glufosinate. Planta. 2022:256(3):57. 10.1007/s00425-022-03968-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson AH, Queitsch C. Genome organization and botanical diversity. Plant Cell. 2024:36(5):1186–1204. 10.1093/plcell/koae045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Priess GL, Norsworthy JK, Godara N, Mauromoustakos A, Butts TR, Roberts TL, Barber T. Confirmation of glufosinate-resistant Palmer amaranth and response to other herbicides. Weed Technol. 2022:36(3):368–372. 10.1017/wet.2022.21 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yaschenko AE, Alonso JM, Stepanova AN. Arabidopsis as a model for translational research. Plant Cell. 2024:koae065. 10.1093/plcell/koae065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]