Abstract
Given the complexity of neuronal tissues, understanding neurochemical pathophysiology puts high demands on bioanalytical techniques with respect to specificity and sensitivity. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has evolved to become an important, biochemical imaging technology for spatial biology in biological and translational research. The technique facilitates comprehensive, sensitive elucidation of the spatial distribution patterns of drugs, lipids, peptides, and small proteins in situ. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)-based MSI is the dominating modality due to its broad applicability and fair compromise of selectivity, sensitivity price, throughput, and ease of use. This is particularly relevant for analysis of spatial lipid patterns, where no other comparable spatial profiling tools are available. Understanding spatial lipid biology in nervous tissue is therefore a key and emerging application area of MSI research.
The aim of this review is to give a concise guide through the MSI workflow for lipid imaging in neuroendocrine tissue and essential parameters to consider while developing and optimizing MSI assays. Further, a broad overview of key developments and applications of MALDI MSI-based spatial neurolipidomics to map lipid dynamics in neuronal structures and ultimately to further understand neurodegenerative disease pathology.
Keywords: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), spatial biology, neurolipidomics, inositols, lysolipids, sphingolipids, gangliosides, amyloid, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Niemann-Pick disease type C1 (NPC1)
1. Introduction
With the increase in average life expectancy for the world’s population, the prevalence of age-related diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), is also increasing. Much detail on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative disease pathology remains elusive, but mounting data point to a role of neuronal lipid species1–3. As much as 90% of the brain dry weight consists of lipids though the functional role of brain lipids in distinct neuropathological processes has long been underestimated. Systemically, lipid metabolism has long been known to be essential in multiple relevant metabolic and immune response mechanisms4–6. However, recent findings have implicated neuronal lipids in neuropathological processes beyond neuroinflammation such as neuronal signaling and amyloidogenic protein aggregation7–9. For instance, variation in genes encoding lipid transporter proteins mainly APOE9–12 and lipid-sensing microglial surface receptors (e.g., TREM2)13–15 have been associated with an increased risk to develop sporadic AD14. Similarly, mutations in glycolipid-processing enzymes glucocerebrosidase (GBA) are associated with both familial forms PD 3 and lysosomal storage disorders such as Niemann-Pick disease16, Sandhoff disease and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
A functional understanding of how lipids modulate neuropathological processes is still just beginning to emerge, highlighting the need for further lipid-centric neuroscience research making use of novel tools such as mass spectrometry. Significant advances in our understanding of CNS-related molecular mechanisms in neurodegeneration have been made because of the development of novel, advanced, high-resolution imaging techniques.
Commonly used spatial techniques in molecular biology research include immunohistochemistry for proteins and lipids and in situ hybridization for nucleotides (DNA/RNA) that are interfaced with brightfield and fluorescent microscopy.
The major challenge in biochemical imaging relates to chemical specificity, selectivity, and spatial resolution. This is particularly relevant for lipid detection, as this is not possible using the conventional biological imaging strategies that are used for protein- (IHC) or nucleotide- (PCR, FISH) detection. Spectroscopic methods such as infrared17–19 or coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS)20 are used to for chemical imaging of e.g. lipid classes and their saturation across tissue sections though do not facilitate identification of single lipid species.
A relatively novel molecular imaging technology, mass spectrometry (MS)-based imaging (MSI)21–24, has, over the last years, made significant inroads into biomedical research and neuroscience research, in particular25–29
Due to the revolutionizing development of soft ionization techniques such as MALDI30 and electrospray ionization (ESI)31, mass spectrometry became the method of choice for protein characterization fueling the development of proteomics32. Further, MS allows fast, sensitive, and specific detection and characterization of intact large biomolecules, including lipids, peptides, and proteins. Though MS-based approaches to tissue extracts facilitate sensitive lipidomic profiling, no accurate spatial information is maintained. Due to the complexity of the CNS, the spatial information of neurochemical distribution patterns is of significant interest to delineate ongoing neuronal mechanisms.
Being a mass spectrometry technique, MSI is characterized by providing high chemical specificity at high sensitivity29. Due to the versatility of the detector range, MSI allows for comprehensive spatial omics profiling of either lipids, metabolites or small proteins in a single tissue imaging experiment. This way typically more than 100, and for dual polarity experiments even >200 different lipid species33 can be discerned easily at 10 μm resolution.
2. Mass spectrometry imaging
Different MSI modalities have been introduced based on different means of analyte desorption and ionization from the biological sample. The most prominent MSI modalities include laser-based systems such as MALDI MSI as well as less common but complementary tools such as LA-ICP and LAESI. An emerging MSI modality is desorption electrospray ionization (DESI)34. Given the advantage of an atmospheric pressure interface and no requirements for sample preparation, DESI is gaining popularity in research areas spanning from field work to diagnostics and drug development. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SALDI) methods offers another LDI based MSI option with no matrix requirement while enabling imaging at high resolution with less noise35, 36. Finally, ion beam-based techniques, i.e., secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)37, are more and more used for biochemical imaging both for lipids but also for proteins.
The principle of MSI is based on sequential acquisition of single mass spectra in a predefined acquisition array across a tissue section. Here the difference between two acquisition events define the pixel resolution. The exact spatial resolution depends on whether a discrete acquisition approach (stepwise moving stage and probe) or a scanning probe and/or a continuously moving stage is used. Aside from this consideration the intensity distribution across the tissue array can be visualized for a given mass signal yielding single ion images (Figure. 1). Different MSI technologies have various strengths and limitations, particularly regarding spatial resolution, molecular information, and mass range, respectively.
Figure 1: Principle of MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

(A) MALDI MS is performed in situ, where matrix-covered tissue sections are analyzed. Analyte ions are generated upon laser irradiation and transferred into a mass analyzer, e.g., a time of flight. A single mass spectrum is acquired for every xi,yj coordinate of a predefined tissue array defining the image area and pixel distance. (B,C) Single ion images are generated by mapping the intensity of an individual ion signal (m/z; relative intensity) over the whole tissue slide87. (C) Example of MALDI MSI of transgenic AD mouse brain showing lipid localization to amyloid plaque pathology. Scalebar: 50μm
MALDI MSI represents a compromise between molecular mass range, sensitivity, and specificity. The technique is based on in situ analyte desorption and ionization upon irradiation-with a UV laser. In MALDI MSI, a crystalline UV radiation-absorbing matrix is sprayed onto the tissue prior to laser irradiation to facilitate the desorption and ionization process30.
The concept of MALD MSI was demonstrated by Bernhard Spengler in 199424 and Richard Caprioli in 199722. The main advantage of MALDI over other techniques is its mass range and selectivity, making it a versatile approach for chemical imaging of both low and high molecular weight species ranging from smaller drugs to complex lipids and small proteins. Aside from its versatility, MALDI is further characterized by its fair tradeoff of high resolution, specificity, sensitivity, robustness, and acquisition speed. In terms of resolution, commercial MALDI systems can achieve 5um. Instrumental advancements have allowed for even higher spatial resolution, such as 1.4μm38 with an in house-developed highly focused MALDI source mounted onto an orbitrap system or even 0.6μm using laser post ionization and a transmission mode instrument geometry39. Therefore, MALDI MSI is currently the most common MSI methodology.
Therefore, the present review focuses on MALDI MSI and aims to provide a concise overview of its application for lipid imaging in brain tissue. Here, a step-by-step guide through the experimental setup and workflow is given to enable the reader to replicate MALDI MSI experiments in-house successfully. Different advances and challenges concerning sample preparation, data acquisition, and validation, are discussed. Finally, an overview of MALDI MSI-based lipid applications focusing on neurodegenerative disease pathology is provided.
3. Experimental Considerations
3.1. Sample Preparation for MALDI imaging of lipids
For MSI-based lipid imaging, various target preparation parameters are of critical relevance as they significantly impact final data quality. This particularly concerns signal intensity, reproducibility, and lateral (i.e., spatial) resolution. The sample preparation workflow in MALDI MSI comprises tissue retrieval and storage, tissue sectioning, tissue wash, and matrix application. Tissue handling during recovery (dissection) and slice collection is critical. Similarly, matrix application facilitating sufficient analyte extraction while avoiding lateral diffusion and large crystal formation are cornerstones for each MALDI MSI experiment. These steps must be adjusted for both the type of tissue and, most importantly, the molecular target of interest.
3.1.1. Tissue Handling
For most MSI experiments, including lipid imaging, fresh frozen tissues are used due to the interference of fixation and embedding chemicals with MS analysis. Removal of those polymers is typically achieved through organic washed which consequently would also remove lipids. Hence those samples do not permit the analysis of endogenous lipids due to the extensive washing for polymer removal. Therefore, fresh frozen (FF) tissue samples are preferred for MSI. To ensure appropriate quality of FF tissue, tissue retrieval and storage is essential. Starting with sample retrieval, typically a short post-mortem delay until dissection, collection and processing (freezing) is critical to minimize analyte degradation40, 41. Dissected fresh tissue samples are typically snap-frozen on dry ice or liquid propane or nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
3.1.2. Tissue Sectioning
One of the first and crucial steps in the MALDI MSI workflow is tissue sectioning. The tools and objects should be cooled to the operating temperature of −20°C. Tissues should be transported in a closed container on dry ice and allowed to acclimatize. The cryotome chamber needs to be surface-sterilized with a disinfectant like ethanol. The tissue is mounted to the cryostat chuck by placing a small drop of embedding media (e.g., optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound), putting the chuck into the cooling chamber of the cryostate and holding the tissue piece onto the mounting medium with ice cold tweezers while the mounting medium freezes. In contrast to cryosectioning protocols used in pathology and histology, tissues cannot be immersed/embedded in OCT for cutting, and contamination with OCT of the cutting surface of the tissue, the cryocollection table or the blade must be avoided at all costs.
The OCT compound should be allowed to solidify at −20°C. The tissue-mounted chuck is then attached to the holder, and sectioning can begin with a thickness of 12 μm. The sections can be transferred onto a glass slide using a brush. Finally, the tissue can be thawed by warming the glass slide from underneath with a finger. It is essential to ensure that the tissue is completely thawed before proceeding with any further staining or analysis. Thawing the tissue too quickly or unevenly can lead to damage and loss of cellular integrity. Therefore, allowing the tissue to thaw at room temperature for sufficient time is recommended before continuing with the desired protocol. It is important to note that the operating temperature and blade condition can affect the outcome, and precautions should be taken to avoid humidity in the chamber. To ensure optimal results, it is recommended to maintain a controlled environment with low humidity during the sectioning process. Additionally, the blade should be regularly held and sharpened to achieve clean and precise sections. Following tissue sectioning the composed sections must be dried in a desiccator for 10min before storage at −80°C to prevent damage by water condensation during freezing42.
3.1.3. Tissue Washing and Matrix Application
One of the biggest sources of interference is tissue preparation. This step involves the thawing and washing of the stored cryosections and subsequent matrix application. The initial washings are used to remove contaminants and salts. In the case of lipid imaging this step involves washes with ammonium salts43, 44, while peptide and protein analysis involve organic washes or organic wash accompanied by buffer wash for lipid removal and protein precipitation45, 46. Matrix application can be performed using different approaches of deposition and roughly be divided into three categories: a) nebulizer/sprayer; b) microspotting and c) sublimation.
The application methods are chosen with respect to the analyte targeted, spatial resolution, reproducibility and sensitivity. Desorption and ionization of charged lipid molecules is easily achievable due to their high abundance. Matrix-free, surface-assisted LDI methods have been reported to accomplish this task using functional surfaces such as DIOS47, NIMS 36 or Si-nanorods48, 49. These methods are obviously superior with respect to spatial resolution and sample handling. However, they have limitations regarding tissue preparation (sectioning), requiring very thin tissue sections along with sensitivity and reproducibility issues. Consequently, matrix-assisted LDI is more prominent, given the rather straightforward sample preparation, increased sensitivity, range of analytes and robustness.
The most used approach involves matrix-spraying using commercially available robotic nebulizer-assisted pneumatic sprayer systems, such as the TM or M3+ Sprayer (HTX Technologies), SunCollect Sprayer (Sunchrom), or iMLayer (Shimadzu), along with open-source or even manual airbrush systems.
Potential sources of error during matrix application include the matrix solvent being too dry or too wet, which could result in solvent evaporation or analyte diffusion; thus, there is a need to be observant for leaks and clogging during runs. To overcome these challenges, other approaches, such as using a heated spray head (HTX Sprayers), dry coating50 or matrix sublimation51–53, have been introduced allowing to control crystal size50, 52. While sublimation provides significant advantages in terms of crystal size, the earlier approach had limitations with respect to repeatability and extraction efficiency; however, recent developments make matrix sublimation a potent alternative for lipid analysis54. .
Different matrices have been proposed for MALDI MSI of various molecular species, including other lipids varying in polarity and hydrophobicity. For lipid analysis, the most used matrices are 2,5-dihydroxy-benzoic acid (DHB)55, 1,5 di-amino-naphthalene (1,5-DAN)51, norharmane56, 9-aminoacridine (9-AA)57, N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine (NEDC)58 and 4-hydroxyl-alpha-cyano-cinnaminic acid (CHCA). The choice of matrix depends on the targeted analyte class, crystal size, mass range, matrix cluster formation.
3.2. MALDI Mass Spectrometry Experimental
3.2.1. MALDI MSI instrumentation
Several MALDI MSI solutions are commercially available. Generally, MALDI MSI instruments can be divided into high vacuum MALDI ToF systems and medium pressure/atmospheric pressure (AP) MALDI setups, where a MALDI ion source is mounted onto an otherwise ESI MS setup.
MALDI ToF systems such as Shimadzu’s Axima, 8030 and 7090 as well as Bruker’s rapifleX/ultrafleXtreme provide very high sensitivity and acquisition speed and have advantages in terms of mass range, e.g., endogenous peptide analysis. Limitations of those setups lie with mass resolution, particularly for compounds over m/z 6000 that are analyzed in linear mode, the systems complexity with a high vacuum source and MS/MS analysis typically relying on post source decay with ion gate-based precursor ion selection. This approach has limitations with respect to precursor ion selection by flight time and, particularly for smaller molecules, and fragmentation efficiency resulting in lower MS/MS sensitivity while consuming sample due to increased laser power. Those challenges have been addressed by including collision chambers or ion traps for CID/CAD fragmentation as found in both Bruker’s and Shimadzus’ MALDI ToF systems, along with MSn capabilities warranted by the iontrap (IT) in the Axima QIT-ToF systems59. A limitation of MALDI-ToF systems is mass resolution, which is typically limited to 40000 in reflector mode, and which makes it difficult to discern low molecular weight species from matrix signals. This is overcome in more exotic systems such the Jeol Spiral ToF60, 61 or SimulToF62, which allow to obtain mass resolution of 5000 (SimulToF) up to 100000 (SpiralToF).
AP or medium-pressure MALDI MS systems bring together the advantages of MALDI MSI in terms of spatial resolution with higher mass resolution (>40000) and more complex mass analyzers including ToF (Shimadzu iMScope63 and Waters Synapt) or FT analyzers such as Bruker’s solariX and scimaX FTICR MS and Thermo MALDI-orbitrap equipped with an intermediate pressure MALDI source38, 64). Further, ion mobility-ToF hybrid analyzers (Bruker TIMS ToF flex, Waters Synapt IMS/cyclic IMS) are available, which are particularly beneficial for resolving isomers in lipid analysis19, 65–68. AP or medium-pressure MALDI MSI systems have limitations in, e.g., terms of sensitivity towards higher molecular weight compounds (peptides and proteins) but offer significant advantages for characterizing and quantifying smaller molecules (lipids) since those systems offer higher mass accuracy, ion mobility and superior MS/MS or MSn capabilities. For MALDI-FTICR and MALDI-orbitrap MSI, some challenges remain with respect to scan speed to the benefit of superior mass resolution.
3.2.2. MALDI MSI Data Acquisition
The parameters for a MALDI imaging experiment are typically specified in an acquisition sequence, specified in the respective MS imaging software. Here, all the acquisition and initial data processing parameters are specified along with the acquisition region, acquisition pattern, and spot-to-spot distance, i.e., spatial resolution. The initial steps of setting up the imaging acquisition experiment involve image registration and teaching for sequence setup, performed in the imaging software provided by the vendor.
For the actual MALDI acquisition method, the optimum number of good-quality spectra that can be obtained from each position must be specified, including the number of laser shots and laser intensity (i.e. fluence). Too high laser fluence can influence the experiment dramatically, leading to signal depletion due to oversampling effects69. Here, the spatial resolution and laser focus settings must be considered accordingly, as small spot-to-spot distances at too high laser fluence lead to the described oversampling phenomena. For a typical DHB or DAN matrix for lipid analysis, 5–10 shots at lower energies are needed to allow straightforward acquisition of imaging data at 10μm69. When specifying the pixel distance and spatial resolution, a further consideration is the acquisition time. Assuming a MALDI instrument with a 10kHz laser is used, acquiring extensive areas at very high spatial resolution will take several hours. During this time, the matrix might sublimate away, making it impossible to acquire reliable data.
Another critical factor to consider during data acquisition is the external calibration of the instrument before sample analysis to ensure accurate and reliable lipid identification. In lipid MALDI MSI experiments, some of the routine external calibrants used are red phosphorus70–72, a mixture of standard peptides51, 70–76, or a mix of lipid standards77, 78 (Table 1). It is always mandatory to include at least two calibration spots placed in two corners diametrically over the slide, and save the spectra to go back later and recalibrate.
Table 1.
Example of routinely used external calibrants for lipid analysis through MALDI-IMS. 2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB), sinapinic acid (SA), α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), N-naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NEDC), 2’,4’,6’-trihydroxyacetophenone monohydrate (THAP), 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (DAN).
| Study | External calibrants | Matrix | Tissue | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaya I. et. al.71 | Red Phosphorus | Norharmane | Non-human primate coronal brain | MALDI-FTICR (SolariX, Bruker) |
| Angelini R. et al.78 | Mixture of phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine | CHCA | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
| Liang X. et al.76 | Mixture of DHB, SA, CHCA, and peptides. | NEDC | Whole Zebrafish | MALDI-TOF/TOF (RapifleX, Bruker) |
| Tobias F. et al.72 | Red Phosphorus | 9AA (lipids) DHB (Cholesterol) |
Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (Sciex) |
| Kaya I. et al.129 | Mixture of standard peptides | DAN | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
| Mallah K. et al.75 | Mixture of standard peptides | DHB | Rat brain | MALDI-LTQ-Orbitrap-XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) |
| Prentice BM. et al.73 | Mixture of standard peptides for positive mode calibration and matrix clusters for negative mode calibration | DAN | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF In-house built |
| O’Rourke MB. et al.70 | Red Phosphorus | DHB | Human brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
| Jackson SN. et al.77 | Mixture of phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins | DHA | Rat brain | MALDI-TOF/TOF (Applied Biosystems) |
| Thomas A. et al.51 | Lipid and peptide mixture | DAN | Mouse brain, liver Fish whole body |
MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
3.3. Data Analysis
3.3.1. Data Processing
Imaging data acquisition is generally followed by data processing, including baseline subtraction, peak picking, and calibration. On-the-fly MS processing uses a baseline removal algorithm that will not result in negative data (e.g., ConvexHull 0.8 flatness; FlexAnalysis, Bruker Daltonics). Peak picking is performed using sensitive algorithms (Centroid, SNAP) considering peaks with a minimum signal-to-noise (S/N) >3. There are several tools for data analysis for MSI, such as, Flex Analysis (Bruker), Image Reveal (Shimadzu), High Definition Imaging (HDI, Waters), ImageQuest (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) as well as commercial and free-standing, vendor independent options such as Lipostar79, SCiLS (Bruker), Mozaic (Spectroswiss, Lausanne, Switzerland), MALDIVision, MSiReader80, Cardinal81, Biomap82, msiQuant83 and SpectralAnalysis84.
3.3.2. Statistical Analysis
The complexity of high content MALDI MSI data poses a significant challenge for data analysis. High resolution imaging data can result in multiple gigabyte file size that for comparative/multimodal analysis of multiple datasets easily exceeds the computational power of standard systems and highlights the need to balance imaging area, mass range and spatial resolution. A typical MSI data analysis workflow involves three steps: 1) segmentation and region of interest (ROI) identification 2) ROI spectral analysis and finally 3) univariate analysis.
To approach the entire MSI dataset, the first step involves a reduction in dimensionality using multivariate data analysis (MVDA) tools such as principal component analysis (PCA)85, maximum autocorrelation factor analysis (MAF)28, hierarchical cluster analysis/bisecting k-means clustering85, 86 and orthogonal projections on latent structure analysis (OPLS)85, 87. The aim is to reduce data complexity and capture tissue heterogeneity encoded in covariate patterns of individual chemical species in discrete MVDA factors (e.g., principal components) or clusters, respectively. The goal is then to annotate distinct histological features that are captured into the same MVDA factor and cluster based on their chemical similarity which is reflected in either covariance (PCA) or proximity (HCA). From the corresponding scores and loadings, the variables contributing the most (i.e., mass peak values) to these variances can be deduced, revealing histology-associated chemical changes which allows to annotate the ROI. These ROI can further be annotated based on immunohistochemical staining subsequently performed on the same tissue section85. This approach serves also as a means of validation for the MVDA-based image segmentation.
The annotated regions of interest can the further investigated through both supervised and unsupervised MVDA tools such as PCA, HCA, soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA), orthogonal partial least square (OPLS), multiblock OPLS (OnPLS), OPLS discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) for either classification or discriminative analysis85, 87. Ultimately, univariate tools such as grouped comparisons (e.g., ANOVA, t-statistics, Mann Whitney) or regression modelling (linear and logarithmic) can be used to validate the segmentation and MVDA data as well as verify the histological relevance of the identified chemical localization patterns.
3.4. Lipid Identification
While IMSMSI is a very powerful approach for in situ lipid profiling, there is a need for complementary validation strategies are needed to fully exploit the potential of the technique fully. Like protein and peptide imaging, initial mass peak annotation is based on accurate mass and reference values reported in the literature or online depositories, such as the LIPID MAPS88, Metaspace88, and SwissLipids Knowledgebase89, 90. A strong advantage in the case of imaging of low molecular weight compounds, such as lipids, is the resolving power of high-end mass analyzers in that mass range, particularly Fourier transform (FT) instruments, but also reflector ToF analyzers. This facilitates compound identification based on low to sub-ppm mass accuracy and the elemental composition deduced by the resolved true isotope pattern. Increased confidence in identification is achieved by follow-up MS/MS or MSn fragmentation analysis and structural characterization77. However, regarding MS/MS, in contrast to protein identification, this step is more challenging as lipids compounds, and their fragmentation patterns are far more diverse. This renders the generation of reference databases, such as those available for protein sequences, very challenging. Notable attempts to generate MS/MS spectral libraries have been made to address this issue but are limited due to the vast number of diverse lipid classes and species90, 91.
A further significant challenge in lipid characterization is the identification of lipid isomers. This concerns the identification both structural isomers and stereoisomers92. This is one of the most significant challenges, as isomeric lipid species can have entirely different biological functions. Very elegant approaches by in vitro and even in situ derivatization have been proposed93–96. Most notably, methods using gas phase ozonolysis in lipidomics and, most recently, online within an imaging experiment have been presented93, 97. Similarly, an approach using in situ modification via a Paterno-Büchi reaction have been reported for localizing double bonds in isomeric phosphor- and glycolipids94, 96.
Ion mobility MS (IM-MS) presents another compelling method for identifying various lipid classes and structural isomers65. The utilization of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization trapped ion mobility spectrometry time-of-flight based mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI TIMS TOF MSI) in lipid identification has been a significant endeavor, as it has enhanced the reliability of correctly identifying lipids by including additional physical factors such as collisional cross-section (CCS) with improved mass accuracy67. This further allows identification by comparing with ex situ lipidomic data acquired through LC-IM-MS67. Together, these advances indicate that lipid characterization, in vitro and in situ, is becoming increasingly robust and routine.
4. MALDI MSI of neuronal lipids in CNS diseases
4.1. Neurodegenerative Diseases
Lipid analyses are relevant in neuroscience research as they have significant roles as both signaling molecules and structural interactions with membrane proteins. Moreover, it has been established that (membrane) lipids interact with self-aggregating proteins such as amyloidogenic proteins and even promote aggregation of these proteins in a pathological context. This is of relevance as abnormal aggregation and deposition of proteins is a seminal pathological hallmark in many neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, PD, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal lobe dementia, and Niemann-Pick disease.
MALDI imaging offers the unique opportunity to characterize the protein pathology associated with lipid biochemistry, which in turn provides targets for mechanistic investigations.
In this context, MALDI imaging has been most prominent for delineating amyloid plaque pathology associated with lipid regulations in AD. Specifically, MALDI imaging identified plaque-specific localizations of gangliosides, ceramide, lysophosphatidic acids, and inositol; sulfatides were depleted at plaques98–100. Moreover, when interfaced with advanced fluorescent microscopy using structure-sensitive luminescent probes, MALDI MSI revealed amyloid polymorphism-specific lipid changes in transgenic AD mice101, 102. Here, ganglioside GM1 correlated with the core structure of senile plaques, while ceramides and phosphoinositols were located in the diffuse periphery102.
Further development towards multimodal imaging approaches includes bimodal101, 102 and trimodal103, 104 lipids and peptide imaging from the same tissue section (Figure 3). The low laser desorption energies facilitate this approach, fluences, and shot numbers necessary to obtain satisfactory lipid spectra using 1,5-DAN matrix dry coating protocols or sublimation69, 103. This approach eventually allows correlating in situ lipid changes to associated protein mechanisms identified with MSI, spectroscopy, and conventional microscopy techniques101, 105. In detail, distinct lipids such as ganglioside GM1 were found to correlate with Aβ1–40 within spectroscopy-assigned core structures. In contrast, other lipids, including ceramides and inositols observed in negative mode and lysophosphocholine (LPC) detected in positive mode, correlate with diffuse parts and Aβ1–42, respectively106. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurological disorder for which early diagnosis has remained elusive. A study on mouse models of familial ALS demonstrated a notable alteration in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) distribution pattern containing PCs within the spinal cord. This shift became apparent during the terminal stage of the disease107. In a separate investigation employing Drosophila melanogaster as a model, alterations in brain phospholipid concentrations throughout the entire disease progression, commencing from the initial stages, were detected, suggesting the possibility of their utility as early biomarkers for the disease108. Understanding the role of lipids in ALS has remained obscure. Nonetheless, the studies mentioned above have shed light on the substantial involvement of lipids, highlighting the potential of utilizing MSI to identify potential biomarkers for early diagnosis or therapeutic targets for ALS.
Figure 3: MALDI Imaging of lipid species in central nervous system (CNS) tissues in different neurodegenerative diseases.

(A) Multimodal MALDI-MSI revealed amyloid plaque-associated lipids in dual polarity and peptides on a coronal mice brain tissue section of transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice (tgArcSwe). Ion images of lipids obtained at 10μm spatial resolution: phosphatidylinositols (PI 38:4, m/z 885.6) in negative (green), lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC 16:0, m/z 496.3,) in positive (red) polarities with subsequent amyloid-β (Aβ 1–40, m/z 4257.6) peptide (blue) ion images in the same imaging region128. (B) MALDI-MS ion images of sulfatide species (a) SHexCer (41:2), (b) SHexCer (42:2), and (c) SHexCer (42:3) in control (left) and MPTP-lesioned macaque brain tissue, a Parkinson’s disease animal model. The lateral resolution is 150 μm71. (C) Representative 3D images of lipid in the CNS of a zebrafish model of Niemann-Pick disease 1. The 3D image was prepared by reconstructing 20 consecutive sections of a sample. The lipids shown here are ceramide (Cer 34:1, Cer 37:1), phosphatidylserine (PS 44:11), and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE 40:5). MALDI MSI was obtained in negative ion mode at a spatial resolution of 50 μm76.
Lipids are crucial to regeneration and inflammation, making them possible indicators for traumatic brain injury (TBI). High-resolution mass spectrometry revealed similar levels of palmitoylcarnitine within substantial nigra compared to the injury site. Since TBI is a risk factor for PD, the change in carnitines may suggest a pathophysiological relationship between TBI and PD, characterized by dopaminergic neuronal death75.
PD pathology can also be mimicked through intracranial injections of neurotoxins that induce cell death of dopaminergic midbrain neurons. Toxins like 6-hydroxy-dopamine (6-OHDA) and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), are commonly utilized as a neurotoxin in monkeys and mice to simulate PD pathology109, 110 as well as for mimic side effects for dopamine replacement therapy26. Here, MALDI-FTICR-MSI in dual polarity of MPTP-treated macaque monkeys found depletion of long-chain hydroxylated sulfatides in motor-related grey matter regions, suggesting myelin sheath disruption around neuron axons, which could negatively affect neural conduction and cause PD71.
4.2. Lysosomal Storage Disorders
Another neurodegenerative example where MSI can provide valuable insight is Niemann-Pick disease type C1 (NPC1), an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder affecting lysosomal storage and trafficking. It is characterized by a mutation in the lysosomal transmembrane protein NPC1, responsible for most (95%) cases, which leads to dysregulation in the transport and metabolization of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in the endosome and lysosome, resulting in cellular death. NPC1 patients typically demonstrate progressive neurodegeneration characterized by pronounced impairment of the cerebellum16. MSI can aid in diagnosing and monitoring the progression of NPC1 disease by accurately measuring lipid levels and their distribution in different brain regions.
In a mouse model of NPC1 study, elevated distributions of GM1, GM2, and GM3 were observed in the cerebellar region. These lipids play crucial roles in cell membrane structure and signaling pathways in the nervous system. The abnormal accumulation of these lipids in the cerebellum suggests dysregulation in lipid metabolism and potentially contributes to the progressive neurodegeneration observed in NPC1 patients. It is worth noting that the authors also disclosed a region-dependent distribution of GM2 and GM3 associated with disease progression72. They also observed lower amounts of GM1, HexCer, and Cer in the same region with the same fatty acid backbone (d36:1). This observation prompted them to hypothesize that the elevated levels of GM2 and GM3 were a result of the degradation of GM1. Additionally, a decrease in sulfatide levels at later time points, indicative of demyelination, was seen. They also identified a novel association between ceramide accumulation and the neurodegeneration of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. The researchers postulated that this alteration may induce cellular death by activating cathepsin D. A marginal increase in unesterified cholesterol levels was seen in the control samples relative to the mutant mice. This observation can be attributed to the relatively lower presence of myelin in NPC1111.
It is important to note that imaging MS methods have limitations in accurately quantifying certain lipid species, such as cholesterol and other sterols, because of poor ionization. A study used a new derivatization method and MSI to make the process more sensitive and allow exact quantitation of sterols on sections of the whole mouse brain. Apart from the cerebellum, they also identified a significant reduction in cholesterol in the hypothalamus, midbrain, and pons in the mutant mouse compared to controls78. A comprehensive list of MALDI MSI for steroid and specifically cholesterol lipid analysis has been provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Strategies for steroid lipid analysis through MALDI MSI.
| Study | Cholesterol analysis method | Matrix | Tissue | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelini R. et al.78 | Enzyme-assisted derivatization for sterol analysis (EADSA)
|
CHCA | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
| Barre FPY. et al.130 | MALDI-2, a positionization strategy, was used to enable a second ionization event to increase the yield of ions. Dehydrated cholesterol (m/z 369.3521 [M + H − H2O]+) |
DHB | Human cartilage and dog liver | Orbitrap elite MS coupled to an intermediate pressure MALDI/ESI interface |
| Dufresne M. et al.131 | Silver cationized cholesterol [M+Ag]+ (m/z 493–495)) | Matrix free | Mouse brain/kidney | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
| Tobias F. et al.72 | Unesterified cholesterol (dehydrated ion, m/z 369.3, [M-H2O+H]+) | DHB | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (ScieX) |
| Patti GJ. et al.132 | Silver cationized cholesterol [M+Ag]+ (m/z 493) Nanostructure initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS) combined with Silver nitrate (AgNO3) |
Matrix free | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (Applied Biosystems) |
| Cobice DF. et al.133 2023 | 7-ketocholesterol. Charge tagging with Girard-T (GP) hydrazine precoated on ITO slide. |
CHCA | Rat adrenal gland/mouse brain | MALDI-FTICR-MS (Bruker SolariX) |
| Muller L. et al.134 | Silver nanoparticles implantation on tissue [M+Ag3]+. Silver adducts of cholesterol and cholesterol ester [M+Ag]+. |
Matrix free | Rat brain | MALDI LTQ-XL-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) |
| Chaurand P. et al.135 | Silver-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (AgLDI MSI) for cholesterol quantitation (m/z 493.26) [12CHO+107Ag]+ | Matrix free | Mouse brain | MALDI TOF/TOF (UltraFlextreme, Bruker) |
Here, a pioneering study used three-dimensional MALDI MSI on the whole body of a zebrafish NPC1 model to map lipid dysregulation across different organs. Their 3D MSI displayed elevated levels of ceramide in the brain and increased levels of sphingomyelin species in the spinal cord, where ceramide is both a precursor and degradation product of sphingomyelin, highlighting Cer-SM pathway dysregulation through the CNS76 (Figure 3C).
4.3. MALDI MSI of neuronal lipids in brain tumors
Given the pronounced tissue heterogeneity, MSI is a powerful technology to interrogate tumor formation and growth mechanisms and cellular cancer biology in general. The widespread presence and vital role of lipids in the CNS have spurred investigations into their involvement in the analysis of brain cancer. The heightened aerobic glycolysis of tumor cells alters lipid metabolism, rendering tumor cells and their lipid patterns a potential diagnostic and theragnostic in situ target. Consequently, MALDI MSI has been employed in various studies to evaluate the relevance of lipids in distinguishing between different types of brain tumors. In a study graft model of human glioblastoma (GBM) and medulloblastoma (MB) in rat, diminished levels of complex gangliosides, GM1 and GD1, were observed in glioma. Conversely, GM3, a less complex ganglioside, exhibited exclusive upregulation in rat glioma. In turn, GM2 was upregulated in medulloblastoma, facilitating differentiation between these two forms of brain cancer112. Another investigation utilized high-spatial resolution MALDI MSI to scrutinize the metabolic profiles of medulloblastoma and pineoblastoma (PB) tumors. The study identified upregulated glycerophosphoglycerols (PG) and glycerophosphocholines (PC) in MB, while sphingolipids such as the cerebroside hexosylceramide (HexCer (36:2)) as well as ceramide-1-phosphate (CerP (47:2)) were specifically upregulated in PB113. A study employing 3D MALDI TOF MSI on pediatric brain tumors found that metastasizing tumors exhibited distinct lipid profiles compared to non-metastasizing tumors. A prevalent characteristic in metastasizing tumors was the reduction of lipids with an 18:1 fatty acyl chain configuration. Among the lipids elevated in metastasizing primary tumors were phosphatidylinositol (PI) and the two phosphoinositide phosphates PIP and PIP2. This indicates dysregulation of the PI3K signaling pathway, which is often attributed to alterations in the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene, and has in turn been linked to oncogenesis in humans due to uncontrolled cell growth and proliferation114.
MALDI MSI also contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of lipids in tumor initiation and progression. Here, a study in human glioblastoma multiform (GBM) tissues observed reduced levels of ω−6 fatty acids, including arachidonic acid and adrenic acid, crucial energy sources, in glioma cells compared to peritumoral tissue115. Another study in an GBM animal model, MALDI FTICR-based MSI revealed elevated levels of small-chain fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, linoleic acid, and PI, aligning with the malignant nature of glioma116.
Beyond fatty acids, critical membrane lipids have been identified as dysregulated in mouse models of glioma, particularly phospholipids and sphingolipids. Here, a decrease in common PCs, such as PC 16:0/16:0 and PC 16:0/18:0, was observed in tumor parenchyma and a heterogeneous increase of PC 16:0/16:1, PC 16:0/18:1, and PC 16:0/18:2 in the tumor tissue itself. The surge in de-saturated fatty acids in tumor phospholipids has been suggested to potentially modulate tumorigenic signaling pathways and enhance tumor cell survival. Additionally, MALDI MSI results disclosed a significant reduction in tumoral sphingomyelin (SM d18:1/18:0)117.
Efforts have also been made to integrate the MALDI MSI approach with MRI, a standard in vivo imaging tool for cancer diagnostics. A study combining in vivo MRI data with high-spectral resolution MALDI MSI from a mouse brain model of GBM revealed an upregulated, co-localized distribution of PCs and cholesterol118. Another technological advancement of MALDI MSI involves the integration of stable isotope tracers with MSI to investigate the flux of the metabolic landscape in brains with glioblastoma. In detail, the authors introduced an approach known as Spatial Isotopologue Spectral Analysis (SISA) to assess fatty acid synthesis and elongation flux. SISA unveiled an eight-fold higher difference in palmitate elongation flux in tumor tissue compared to healthy brain tissue, possibly due to the elevated demand for eighteen carbon acyl chains due to their prevalence in the membrane bilayer. This study emphasizes the potential of lipid synthesis as a promising therapeutic target in GBM119.
5. Concluding Remarks
The developments and applications of MS imaging presented here highlight the immense potential of the technique for studying spatial lipid dynamics in complex biological tissues. Recent developments are increasingly overcoming significant challenges associated with sample preparation, sample throughput, and lipid identification. Moreover, standardized protocols120, 121 and data formats122 along with round robin studies123 and common reporting standards124 significantly improve data reproducibility and result accuracy. This is essential to expedite the use of MSI-based applications in clinical settings125, 126.
In summary, MALDI lipid imaging is increasingly becoming a valued technology for molecular histology significantly exceeding standard tools used to study tissue pathology. It has shown great potential for refining molecular disease pathology including neurodegenerative-, neuroinflammatory- and cancer pathologies.
Figure 2: Sample preparation optimization for ganglioside analysis through MALDI-TOF MSI of mouse brain tissue sections.

(A) Optimization by washing tissue sections with ammonium formate, deposition, matrix sublimation, and waiting before analysis increased ganglioside species signal intensity. Different species and fatty acyl chain lengths of gangliosides can be identified, expanding the range of complex lipids that can be studied. The scale bar is 2 mm, and the lateral resolution is 65 μm. ND: not detected. The figure has been adapted from127. (B) Application of ozone-induced dissociation (OzID) in resolving double-bond (db) positional isomers. MALDI-CID/OzID fractional images of PC(16:0/18:1), PC(18:0/18:1) and PC(16:0/20:1) in an animal model of medulloblastoma. The images highlight the importance of resolving structural isomers since their distribution is specific, and heterogeneous distributions can be present even for lipids with the same fatty acyl chain, revealing pertinent information regarding disease pathogenesis97.
Acknowledgements
JH is supported by the NIH (R01 AG078796, R21AG078538, R21AG080705), the Swedish Research Council VR (#2019-02397, #2023-02796), the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (#AF-968238, #AF-939767), the Swedish Brain Foundation (Hjärnfonden, FO2022-0311), Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse, Åhlén-Stiftelsen. (#213027), Stiftelsen Gamla Tjänarinnor and Gun och Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse. JNS is supported by the NIH (R01 AG078796, R21AG080705, R21AG072343). HZ is a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2023-00356; #2022-01018 and #2019-02397), the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101053962, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-71320), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809-2016862), the AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer’s Association (#ADSF-21-831376-C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, and #ADSF-21-831377-C), the Bluefield Project, the Olav Thon Foundation, the Erling-Persson Family Foundation, Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2022-0270), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), the European Union Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND2021-00694), the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (UKDRI-1003).
KB is supported by the Swedish Research Council (#2017-00915 and #2022-00732), the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (#AF-930351, #AF-939721 and #AF-968270), Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2017-0243 and #ALZ2022-0006), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986 and #ALFGBG-965240), the European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders (JPND2019-466-236), the Alzheimer’s Association 2021 Zenith Award (ZEN-21-848495), the Alzheimer’s Association 2022-2025 Grant (SG-23-1038904 QC), and the Kirsten and Freddy Johansen Foundation.
References
- (1).Di Paolo G; Kim TW Linking lipids to Alzheimer’s disease: cholesterol and beyond. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 2011, 12 (5), 284–296. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Cutler RG; Kelly J; Storie K; Pedersen WA; Tammara A; Hatanpaa K; Troncoso JC; Mattson MP Involvement of oxidative stress-induced abnormalities in ceramide and cholesterol metabolism in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101 (7), 2070–2075. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0305799101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Belarbi K; Cuvelier E; Bonte MA; Desplanque M; Gressier B; Devos D; Chartier-Harlin MC Glycosphingolipids and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2020, 15 (1), 59. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-020-00408-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Leuti A; Fazio D; Fava M; Piccoli A; Oddi S; Maccarrone M Bioactive lipids, inflammation and chronic diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020, 159, 133–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Bogie JFJ; Haidar M; Kooij G; Hendriks JJA Fatty acid metabolism in the progression and resolution of CNS disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020, 159, 198–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Gorica E; Calderone V Arachidonic Acid Derivatives and Neuroinflammation. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2022, 21 (2), 118–129. DOI: 10.2174/1871527320666210208130412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Fantini J; Yahi N Molecular insights into amyloid regulation by membrane cholesterol and sphingolipids: common mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Rev. Mol. Med 2010, 12, Review. DOI: 10.1017/s1462399410001602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).García-Viñuales S; Sciacca MFM; Lanza V; Santoro AM; Grasso G; Tundo GR; Sbardella D; Coletta M; Grasso G; La Rosa C; et al. The interplay between lipid and Aβ amyloid homeostasis in Alzheimer’s Disease: risk factors and therapeutic opportunities. Chem Phys Lipids 2021, 236, 105072. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2021.105072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Fernández-Calle R; Konings SC; Frontiñán-Rubio J; García-Revilla J; Camprubí-Ferrer L; Svensson M; Martinson I; Boza-Serrano A; Venero JL; Nielsen HM; et al. APOE in the bullseye of neurodegenerative diseases: impact of the APOE genotype in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and brain diseases. Mol Neurodegener 2022, 17 (1), 62. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-022-00566-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Serrano-Pozo A; Das S; Hyman BT APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol 2021, 20 (1), 68–80. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30412-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Martens YA; Zhao N; Liu CC; Kanekiyo T; Yang AJ; Goate AM; Holtzman DM; Bu G ApoE Cascade Hypothesis in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Neuron 2022, 110 (8), 1304–1317. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Raulin AC; Doss SV; Trottier ZA; Ikezu TC; Bu G; Liu CC ApoE in Alzheimer’s disease: pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. Mol Neurodegener 2022, 17 (1), 72. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-022-00574-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Loving BA; Bruce KD Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Microglia. Front Physiol 2020, 11, 393. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Li RY; Qin Q; Yang HC; Wang YY; Mi YX; Yin YS; Wang M; Yu CJ; Tang Y TREM2 in the pathogenesis of AD: a lipid metabolism regulator and potential metabolic therapeutic target. Mol Neurodegener 2022, 17 (1), 40. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-022-00542-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Guerreiro R; Wojtas A; Bras J; Carrasquillo M; Rogaeva E; Majounie E; Cruchaga C; Sassi C; Kauwe JS; Younkin S; et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2013, 368 (2), 117–127. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Vance JE; Karten B Niemann-Pick C disease and mobilization of lysosomal cholesterol by cyclodextrin. J Lipid Res 2014, 55 (8), 1609–1621. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R047837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Neumann EK; Comi TJ; Spegazzini N; Mitchell JW; Rubakhin SS; Gillette MU; Bhargava R; Sweedler JV Multimodal Chemical Analysis of the Brain by High Mass Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging. Anal Chem 2018, 90 (19), 11572–11580. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Rabe JH; D AS; Schulz S; Munteanu B; Ott M; Ochs K; Hohenberger P; Marx A; Platten M; Opitz CA; et al. Fourier Transform Infrared Microscopy Enables Guidance of Automated Mass Spectrometry Imaging to Predefined Tissue Morphologies. Scientific reports 2018, 8 (1), 313. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18477-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Rivera ES; Djambazova KV; Neumann EK; Caprioli RM; Spraggins JM Integrating ion mobility and imaging mass spectrometry for comprehensive analysis of biological tissues: A brief review and perspective. J Mass Spectrom 2020, 55 (12), e4614. DOI: 10.1002/jms.4614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Kiskis J; Fink H; Nyberg L; Thyr J; Li JY; Enejder A Plaque-associated lipids in Alzheimer’s diseased brain tissue visualized by nonlinear microscopy. Scientific reports 2015, 5, 13489. DOI: 10.1038/srep13489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).McDonnell LA; Heeren RMA Imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2007, 26 (4), 606–643. DOI: 10.1002/mas.20124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Caprioli RM; Farmer TB; Gile J Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal Chem 1997, 69 (23), 4751–4760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Cornett DS; Reyzer ML; Chaurand P; Caprioli RM MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nature Methods 2007, 4 (10), 828–833. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Spengler B; Hubert M; Kaufmann R MALDI ion imaging and biological ion imaging with a new scanning UV-laser microprobe. In Proccedings of the 42nd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Chicago, Illinois, 1994; p 1041. [Google Scholar]
- (25).Carlred L; Michno W; Kaya I; Sjovall P; Syvanen S; Hanrieder J Probing amyloid-beta pathology in transgenic Alzheimer’s disease (tgArcSwe) mice using MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Journal of neurochemistry 2016, 138 (3), 469–478. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Hanrieder J; Ljungdahl A; Falth M; Mammo SE; Bergquist J; Andersson M L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia is associated with regional increase of striatal dynorphin peptides as elucidated by imaging mass spectrometry. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 2011, 10 (10), M111.009308. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.009308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Hanrieder J; Malmberg P; Ewing AG Spatial neuroproteomics using imaging mass spectrometry. Biochimica et biophysica acta 2015, 1854 (7), 718–731. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Hanrieder J; Malmberg P; Lindberg OR; Fletcher JS; Ewing AG Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry based molecular histology of human spinal cord tissue and motor neurons. Analytical chemistry 2013, 85 (18), 8741–8748. DOI: 10.1021/ac401830m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Hanrieder J; Phan NT; Kurczy ME; Ewing AG Imaging mass spectrometry in neuroscience. ACS chemical neuroscience 2013, 4 (5), 666–679, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review. DOI: 10.1021/cn400053c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Karas M; Hillenkamp F Laser Desorption Ionization of Proteins with Molecular Masses Exceeding 10000 Daltons. Analytical chemistry 1988, 60 (20), 2299–2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Fenn JB; Mann M; Meng CK; Wong SF; Whitehouse CM Electrospray Ionization for Mass-Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules. Science 1989, 246 (4926), 64–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Aebersold R; Mann M Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422 (6928), 198–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Angerer TB; Bour J; Biagi JL; Moskovets E; Frache G Evaluation of 6 MALDI-Matrices for 10 μm Lipid Imaging and On-Tissue MSn with AP-MALDI-Orbitrap. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2022, 33 (5), 760–771. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.1c00327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Takats Z; Wiseman JM; Gologan B; Cooks RG Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science 2004, 306 (5695), 471–473. DOI: 10.1126/science.1104404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Iakab SA; Baquer G; Lafuente M; Pina MP; Ramirez JL; Rafols P; Correig-Blanchar X; Garcia-Altares M SALDI-MS and SERS Multimodal Imaging: One Nanostructured Substrate to Rule Them Both. Anal Chem 2022, 94 (6), 2785–2793. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Northen TR; Yanes O; Northen MT; Marrinucci D; Uritboonthai W; Apon J; Golledge SL; Nordstrom A; Siuzdak G Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry. Nature 2007, 449 (7165), 1033–1036. DOI: 10.1038/nature06195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Vickerman JC Molecular imaging and depth profiling by mass spectrometry--SIMS, MALDI or DESI? The Analyst 2011, 136 (11), 2199–2217. DOI: 10.1039/c1an00008j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Kompauer M; Heiles S; Spengler B Atmospheric pressure MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of tissues and cells at 1.4-mum lateral resolution. Nat Methods 2017, 14 (1), 90–96. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Niehaus M; Soltwisch J; Belov ME; Dreisewerd K Transmission-mode MALDI-2 mass spectrometry imaging of cells and tissues at subcellular resolution. Nat Methods 2019, 16 (9), 925–931. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0536-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Goodwin RJA; Dungworth JC; Cobb SR; Pitt AR Time-dependent evolution of tissue markers by MALDI-MS imaging. Proteomics 2008, 8 (18), 3801–3808. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Patterson NH; Thomas A; Chaurand P Monitoring time-dependent degradation of phospholipids in sectioned tissues by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 2014, 49 (7), 622–627. DOI: 10.1002/jms.3382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Hanrieder J; Ljungdahl A; Andersson M MALDI imaging mass spectrometry of neuropeptides in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE 2012, (60). DOI: 10.3791/3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Angel PM; Spraggins JM; Baldwin HS; Caprioli R Enhanced sensitivity for high spatial resolution lipid analysis by negative ion mode matrix assisted laser desorption ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2012, 84 (3), 1557–1564. DOI: 10.1021/ac202383m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Wang HY; Liu CB; Wu HW A simple desalting method for direct MALDI mass spectrometry profiling of tissue lipids. J Lipid Res 2011, 52 (4), 840–849. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D013060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Seeley EH; Oppenheimer SR; Mi D; Chaurand P; Caprioli RM Enhancement of protein sensitivity for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry after chemical treatment of tissue sections. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2008, 19 (8), 1069–1077. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Thomas A; Patterson NH; Laveaux Charbonneau J; Chaurand P Orthogonal organic and aqueous-based washes of tissue sections to enhance protein sensitivity by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 2013, 48 (1), 42–48. DOI: 10.1002/jms.3114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Wei J; Buriak JM; Siuzdak G Desorption-ionization mass spectrometry on porous silicon. Nature 1999, 399 (6733), 243–246. DOI: 10.1038/20400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Fincher JA; Dyer JE; Korte AR; Yadavilli S; Morris NJ; Vertes A Matrix-free mass spectrometry imaging of mouse brain tissue sections on silicon nanopost arrays. J Comp Neurol 2019, 527 (13), 2101–2121. DOI: 10.1002/cne.24566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Stopka SA; Rong C; Korte AR; Yadavilli S; Nazarian J; Razunguzwa TT; Morris NJ; Vertes A Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples on Nanophotonic Laser Desorption Ionization Platforms. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016, 55 (14), 4482–4486. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201511691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Puolitaival SM; Burnum KE; Cornett DS; Caprioli RM Solvent-free matrix dry-coating for MALDI Imaging of phospholipids. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2008, 19 (6), 882–886. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Thomas A; Charbonneau JL; Fournaise E; Chaurand P Sublimation of new matrix candidates for high spatial resolution imaging mass spectrometry of lipids: enhanced information in both positive and negative polarities after 1,5-diaminonapthalene deposition. Anal Chem 2012, 84 (4), 2048–2054. DOI: 10.1021/ac2033547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Yang J; Caprioli RM Matrix Sublimation/Recrystallization for Imaging Proteins by Mass Spectrometry at High Spatial Resolution. Analytical chemistry 2011, 83 (14), 5728–5734. DOI: 10.1021/ac200998a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Hankin JA; Barkley RM; Murphy RC Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2007, 18 (9), 1646–1652. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Dufresne M; Patterson NH; Norris JL; Caprioli RM Combining Salt Doping and Matrix Sublimation for High Spatial Resolution MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Neutral Lipids. Anal Chem 2019, 91 (20), 12928–12934. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Schiller J; Süss R; Fuchs B; Müller M; Petković M; Zschörnig O; Waschipky H The suitability of different DHB isomers as matrices for the MALDI-TOF MS analysis of phospholipids: which isomer for what purpose? Eur Biophys J 2007, 36 (4–5), 517–527. DOI: 10.1007/s00249-006-0090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Scott AJ; Flinders B; Cappell J; Liang T; Pelc RS; Tran B; Kilgour DP; Heeren RM; Goodlett DR; Ernst RK Norharmane Matrix Enhances Detection of Endotoxin by MALDI-MS for Simultaneous Profiling of Pathogen, Host, and Vector Systems. Pathog Dis 2016, 74 (8). DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftw097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Cheng H; Sun G; Yang K; Gross RW; Han X Selective desorption/ionization of sulfatides by MALDI-MS facilitated using 9-aminoacridine as matrix. J Lipid Res 2010, 51 (6), 1599–1609. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D004077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Wang J; Qiu S; Chen S; Xiong C; Liu H; Wang J; Zhang N; Hou J; He Q; Nie Z MALDI-TOF MS imaging of metabolites with a N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride matrix and its application to colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Anal Chem 2015, 87 (1), 422–430. DOI: 10.1021/ac504294s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Shimma S; Sugiura Y; Hayasaka T; Zaima N; Matsumoto M; Setou M Mass imaging and identification of biomolecules with MALDI-QIT-TOF-based system. Anal Chem 2008, 80 (3), 878–885. DOI: 10.1021/ac071301v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Nishiguchi M; Ueno Y; Toyoda M; Setou M Design of a new multi-turn ion optical system ‘IRIS’ for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J Mass Spectrom 2009, 44 (5), 594–604. DOI: 10.1002/jms.1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Toyoda M; Ishihara M; Yamaguchi S; Ito H; Matsuo T; Roll R; Rosenbauer H Construction of a new multi-turn time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J Mass Spectrom 2000, 35 (2), 163–167. DOI: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Vestal M; Li L; Dobrinskikh E; Shi Y; Wang B; Shi X; Li S; Vestal C; Parker K Rapid MALDI-TOF molecular imaging: Instrument enhancements and their practical consequences. J Mass Spectrom 2020, 55 (8), e4423. DOI: 10.1002/jms.4423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Islam A; Sakamoto T; Zhai Q; Rahman MM; Mamun MA; Takahashi Y; Kahyo T; Setou M Application of AP-MALDI Imaging Mass Microscope for the Rapid Mapping of Imipramine, Chloroquine, and Their Metabolites in the Kidney and Brain of Wild-Type Mice. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022, 15 (11). DOI: 10.3390/ph15111314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (64).Rompp A; Guenther S; Schober Y; Schulz O; Takats Z; Kummer W; Spengler B Histology by mass spectrometry: label-free tissue characterization obtained from high-accuracy bioanalytical imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2010, 49 (22), 3834–3838. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200905559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (65).Jackson SN; Ugarov M; Egan T; Post JD; Langlais D; Albert Schultz J; Woods AS MALDI-ion mobility-TOFMS imaging of lipids in rat brain tissue. J Mass Spectrom 2007, 42 (8), 1093–1098. DOI: 10.1002/jms.1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Lamont L; Hadavi D; Bowman AP; Flinders B; Cooper-Shepherd D; Palmer M; Jordens J; Mengerink Y; Honing M; Langridge J; et al. High-resolution ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry for isomeric separation of prostanoids after Girard’s reagent T derivatization. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM 2023, 37 (5), e9439. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Michno W; Wehrli PM; Koutarapu S; Marsching C; Minta K; Ge J; Meyer SW; Zetterberg H; Blennow K; Henkel C; et al. Structural amyloid plaque polymorphism is associated with distinct lipid accumulations revealed by trapped ion mobility mass spectrometry imaging. Journal of neurochemistry 2022, 160 (4), 482–498. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Qian Y; Guo X; Wang Y; Ouyang Z; Ma X Mobility-Modulated Sequential Dissociation Analysis Enables Structural Lipidomics in Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2023, e202312275. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202312275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (69).Kaya I; Michno W; Brinet D; Iacone Y; Zanni G; Blennow K; Zetterberg H; Hanrieder J Histology-Compatible MALDI Mass Spectrometry Based Imaging of Neuronal Lipids for Subsequent Immunofluorescent Staining. Analytical chemistry 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).O’Rourke MB; Smith CC; De La Monte SM; Sutherland GT; Padula MP Higher Mass Accuracy MALDI-TOF/TOF Lipid Imaging of Human Brain Tissue in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2019, 126 (1), e86. DOI: 10.1002/cpmb.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (71).Kaya I; Nilsson A; Luptakova D; He Y; Vallianatou T; Bjarterot P; Svenningsson P; Bezard E; Andren PE Spatial lipidomics reveals brain region-specific changes of sulfatides in an experimental MPTP Parkinson’s disease primate model. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2023, 9 (1), 118. DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00558-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (72).Tobias F; Olson MT; Cologna SM Mass spectrometry imaging of lipids: untargeted consensus spectra reveal spatial distributions in Niemann-Pick disease type C1. J Lipid Res 2018, 59 (12), 2446–2455. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D086090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (73).Prentice BM; Chumbley CW; Caprioli RM High-speed MALDI MS/MS imaging mass spectrometry using continuous raster sampling. J Mass Spectrom 2015, 50 (4), 703–710. DOI: 10.1002/jms.3579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (74).Kaya I; Jennische E; Lange S; Tarik Baykal A; Malmberg P; Fletcher JS Brain region-specific amyloid plaque-associated myelin lipid loss, APOE deposition and disruption of the myelin sheath in familial Alzheimer’s disease mice. Journal of neurochemistry 2020, 154 (1), 84–98. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (75).Mallah K; Quanico J; Raffo-Romero A; Cardon T; Aboulouard S; Devos D; Kobeissy F; Zibara K; Salzet M; Fournier I Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Lipids in Experimental Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Detecting Acylcarnitines as Injury Related Markers. Anal Chem 2019, 91 (18), 11879–11887. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (76).Liang X; Cao S; Xie P; Hu X; Lin Y; Liang J; Zhang S; Xian B; Cao H; Luan T; et al. Three-Dimensional Imaging of Whole-Body Zebrafish Revealed Lipid Disorders Associated with Niemann-Pick Disease Type C1. Anal Chem 2021, 93 (23), 8178–8187. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (77).Jackson SN; Wang HY; Woods AS In situ structural characterization of phosphatidylcholines in brain tissue using MALDI-MS/MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005, 16 (12), 2052–2056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (78).Angelini R; Yutuc E; Wyatt MF; Newton J; Yusuf FA; Griffiths L; Cooze BJ; El Assad D; Frache G; Rao W; et al. Visualizing Cholesterol in the Brain by On-Tissue Derivatization and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Anal Chem 2021, 93 (11), 4932–4943. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (79).Tortorella S; Tiberi P; Bowman AP; Claes BSR; Ščupáková K; Heeren RMA; Ellis SR; Cruciani G LipostarMSI: Comprehensive, Vendor-Neutral Software for Visualization, Data Analysis, and Automated Molecular Identification in Mass Spectrometry Imaging. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2020, 31 (1), 155–163. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.9b00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (80).Robichaud G; Garrard KP; Barry JA; Muddiman DC MSiReader: an open-source interface to view and analyze high resolving power MS imaging files on Matlab platform. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2013, 24 (5), 718–721. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0607-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (81).Bemis KD; Harry A; Eberlin LS; Ferreira C; van de Ven SM; Mallick P; Stolowitz M; Vitek O Cardinal: an R package for statistical analysis of mass spectrometry-based imaging experiments. Bioinformatics 2015, 31 (14), 2418–2420. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (82).Rauch M. a. M. S., Biomap 2000, https://ms-imaging.org/wp/biomap/.
- (83).Källback P; Nilsson A; Shariatgorji M; Andrén PE msIQuant – Quantitation Software for Mass Spectrometry Imaging Enabling Fast Access, Visualization, and Analysis of Large Data Sets. Analytical chemistry 2016, 88 (8), 4346–4353. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (84).Race AM; Palmer AD; Dexter A; Steven RT; Styles IB; Bunch J SpectralAnalysis: Software for the Masses. Analytical chemistry 2016, 88 (19), 9451–9458. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (85).Wehrli PM; Michno W; Blennow K; Zetterberg H; Hanrieder J Chemometric Strategies for Sensitive Annotation and Validation of Anatomical Regions of Interest in Complex Imaging Mass Spectrometry Data. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2019, 30 (11), 2278–2288. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02327-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (86).Deininger S-O; Ebert MP; Fuetterer A; Gerhard M; Roecken C MALDI Imaging Combined with Hierarchical Clustering as a New Tool for the Interpretation of Complex Human Cancers. Journal of Proteome Research 2008, 7 (12), 5230–5236. DOI: 10.1021/pr8005777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (87).Wehrli PM; Ge J; Michno W; Koutarapu S; Dreos A; Jha D; Zetterberg H; Blennow K; Hanrieder J Correlative Chemical Imaging and Spatial Chemometrics Delineate Alzheimer Plaque Heterogeneity at High Spatial Resolution. JACS Au 2023, 3 (3), 762–774. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (88).Palmer A; Phapale P; Chernyavsky I; Lavigne R; Fay D; Tarasov A; Kovalev V; Fuchser J; Nikolenko S; Pineau C; et al. FDR-controlled metabolite annotation for high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2017, 14 (1), 57–60. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (89).Aimo L; Liechti R; Hyka-Nouspikel N; Niknejad A; Gleizes A; Gotz L; Kuznetsov D; David FP; van der Goot FG; Riezman H; et al. The SwissLipids knowledgebase for lipid biology. Bioinformatics 2015, 31 (17), 2860–2866. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (90).Sud M; Fahy E; Cotter D; Brown A; Dennis EA; Glass CK; Merrill AH Jr.; Murphy RC; Raetz CR; Russell DW; et al. LMSD: LIPID MAPS structure database. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35 (Database issue), D527–532. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (91).Fahy E; Subramaniam S; Murphy RC; Nishijima M; Raetz CR; Shimizu T; Spener F; van Meer G; Wakelam MJ; Dennis EA Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res 2009, 50 Suppl (Suppl), S9–14. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R800095-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (92).Porta Siegel T; Ekroos K; Ellis SR Reshaping Lipid Biochemistry by Pushing Barriers in Structural Lipidomics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2019, 58 (20), 6492–6501. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201812698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (93).Thomas MC; Mitchell TW; Harman DG; Deeley JM; Murphy RC; Blanksby SJ Elucidation of double bond position in unsaturated lipids by ozone electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2007, 79 (13), 5013–5022. DOI: 10.1021/ac0702185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (94).Bednařík A; Bölsker S; Soltwisch J; Dreisewerd K An On-Tissue Paternò-Büchi Reaction for Localization of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds in Phospholipids and Glycolipids by Matrix-Assisted Laser-Desorption-Ionization Mass-Spectrometry Imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018, 57 (37), 12092–12096. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201806635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (95).Su Y; Ma X; Page J; Shi R; Xia Y; Ouyang Z Mapping Lipid C=C Location Isomers in Organ Tissues by Coupling Photochemical Derivatization and Rapid Extractive Mass Spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 2019, 445. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2019.116206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (96).Wäldchen F; Spengler B; Heiles S Reactive Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging Using an Intrinsically Photoreactive Paternò-Büchi Matrix for Double-Bond Localization in Isomeric Phospholipids. J Am Chem Soc 2019, 141 (30), 11816–11820. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (97).Paine MRL; Poad BLJ; Eijkel GB; Marshall DL; Blanksby SJ; Heeren RMA; Ellis SR Mass Spectrometry Imaging with Isomeric Resolution Enabled by Ozone-Induced Dissociation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018, 57 (33), 10530–10534. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201802937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (98).Kaya I; Brinet D; Michno W; Syvanen S; Sehlin D; Zetterberg H; Blennow K; Hanrieder J Delineating Amyloid Plaque Associated Neuronal Sphingolipids in Transgenic Alzheimer’s Disease Mice (tgArcSwe) Using MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry. ACS chemical neuroscience 2017. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (99).Hong JH; Kang JW; Kim DK; Baik SH; Kim KH; Shanta SR; Jung JH; Mook-Jung I; Kim KP Global changes of phospholipids identified by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Lipid Res 2016, 57 (1), 36–45. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M057869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (100).Caughlin S; Maheshwari S; Agca Y; Agca C; Harris AJ; Jurcic K; Yeung KK; Cechetto DF; Whitehead SN Membrane-lipid homeostasis in a prodromal rat model of Alzheimer’s disease: Characteristic profiles in ganglioside distributions during aging detected using MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018, 1862 (6), 1327–1338. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (101).Michno W; Kaya I; Nystrom S; Guerard L; Nilsson KPR; Hammarstrom P; Blennow K; Zetterberg H; Hanrieder J Multimodal Chemical Imaging of Amyloid Plaque Polymorphism Reveals Abeta Aggregation Dependent Anionic Lipid Accumulations and Metabolism. Anal Chem 2018, 90 (13), 8130–8138. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (102).Michno W; Wehrli PM; Zetterberg H; Blennow K; Hanrieder J GM1 locates to mature amyloid structures implicating a prominent role for glycolipid-protein interactions in Alzheimer pathology. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom 2019, 1867 (5), 458–467. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (103).Kaya I; Brinet D; Michno W; Başkurt M; Zetterberg H; Blenow K; Hanrieder J Novel Trimodal MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry (IMS3) at 10 μm Reveals Spatial Lipid and Peptide Correlates Implicated in Aβ Plaque Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS chemical neuroscience 2017, 8 (12), 2778–2790. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (104).Kaya I; Zetterberg H; Blennow K; Hanrieder J Shedding Light on the Molecular Pathology of Amyloid Plaques in Transgenic Alzheimer’s Disease Mice Using Multimodal MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry. ACS chemical neuroscience 2018, 9 (7), 1802–1817. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (105).Michno W; Nystrom S; Wehrli P; Lashley T; Brinkmalm G; Guerard L; Syvanen S; Sehlin D; Kaya I; Brinet D; et al. Pyroglutamation of amyloid-betax-42 (Abetax-42) followed by Abeta1-40 deposition underlies plaque polymorphism in progressing Alzheimer’s disease pathology. The Journal of biological chemistry 2019. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (106).Michno W, Bowman A, Jha D, Minta K, Ge J, Koutarapu S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Lashley T, Heeren R, and Hanrieder J. Chemical imaging of sphingolipids and phospholipids at the single amyloid-β plaque level in post-mortem human Alzheimer’s disease brain. ChemRxiv, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- (107).Arima H; Omura T; Hayasaka T; Masaki N; Hanada M; Xu D; Banno T; Kobayashi K; Takeuchi H; Kadomatsu K; et al. Reductions of docosahexaenoic acid-containing phosphatidylcholine levels in the anterior horn of an ALS mouse model. Neuroscience 2015, 297, 127–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (108).Jang HJ; Le MUT; Park JH; Chung CG; Shon JG; Lee GS; Moon JH; Lee SB; Choi JS; Lee TG; et al. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Phospholipid Changes in a Drosophila Model of Early Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2021, 32 (10), 2536–2545. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.1c00167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (109).Skold K; Svensson M; Nilsson A; Zhang XQ; Nydahl K; Caprioli RM; Svenningsson P; Andren PE Decreased striatal levels of PEP-19 following MPTP lesion in the mouse. Journal of Proteome Research 2006, 5 (2), 262–269. DOI: 10.1021/pr050281f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (110).Ungerstedt U 6-Hydroxy-dopamine induced degeneration of central monoamine neurons. Eur. J. Pharmacol 1968, 5 (1), 107, Note. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (111).Tobias F; Pathmasiri KC; Cologna SM Mass spectrometry imaging reveals ganglioside and ceramide localization patterns during cerebellar degeneration in the Npc1(−/−) mouse model. Anal Bioanal Chem 2019, 411 (22), 5659–5668. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-01989-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (112).Ermini L; Morganti E; Post A; Yeganeh B; Caniggia I; Leadley M; Faria CC; Rutka JT; Post M Imaging mass spectrometry identifies prognostic ganglioside species in rodent intracranial transplants of glioma and medulloblastoma. PLoS One 2017, 12 (5), e0176254. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (113).Clark AR; Calligaris D; Regan MS; Pomeranz Krummel D; Agar JN; Kallay L; MacDonald T; Schniederjan M; Santagata S; Pomeroy SL; et al. Rapid discrimination of pediatric brain tumors by mass spectrometry imaging. J Neurooncol 2018, 140 (2), 269–279. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2978-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (114).Paine MRL; Liu J; Huang D; Ellis SR; Trede D; Kobarg JH; Heeren RMA; Fernandez FM; MacDonald TJ Three-Dimensional Mass Spectrometry Imaging Identifies Lipid Markers of Medulloblastoma Metastasis. Sci Rep 2019, 9 (1), 2205. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38257-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (115).Kampa JM; Kellner U; Marsching C; Ramallo Guevara C; Knappe UJ; Sahin M; Giampa M; Niehaus K; Bednarz H Glioblastoma multiforme: Metabolic differences to peritumoral tissue and IDH-mutated gliomas revealed by mass spectrometry imaging. Neuropathology 2020, 40 (6), 546–558. DOI: 10.1111/neup.12671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (116).Dilillo M; Ait-Belkacem R; Esteve C; Pellegrini D; Nicolardi S; Costa M; Vannini E; Graaf EL; Caleo M; McDonnell LA Ultra-High Mass Resolution MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Metabolites in a Mouse Model of Glioblastoma. Scientific reports 2017, 7 (1), 603. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00703-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (117).Wang HJ; Huang CY; Wei KC; Hung KC A mass spectrometry imaging and lipidomic investigation reveals aberrant lipid metabolism in the orthotopic mouse glioma. J Lipid Res 2022, 63 (12), 100304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (118).Abdelmoula WM; Lopez BG; Randall EC; Kapur T; Sarkaria JN; White FM; Agar JN; Wells WM; Agar NYR Peak learning of mass spectrometry imaging data using artificial neural networks. Nat Commun 2021, 12 (1), 5544. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25744-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (119).Schwaiger-Haber M; Stancliffe E; Anbukumar DS; Sells B; Yi J; Cho K; Adkins-Travis K; Chheda MG; Shriver LP; Patti GJ Using mass spectrometry imaging to map fluxes quantitatively in the tumor ecosystem. Nat Commun 2023, 14 (1), 2876. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38403-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (120).Lamont L; Hadavi D; Viehmann B; Flinders B; Heeren RMA; Vreeken RJ; Porta Siegel T Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of drugs and metabolites: a multiplatform comparison. Anal Bioanal Chem 2021, 413 (10), 2779–2791. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03210-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (121).Balluff B; Hopf C; Porta Siegel T; Grabsch HI; Heeren RMA Batch Effects in MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2021, 32 (3), 628–635. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (122).Schramm T; Hester Z; Klinkert I; Both JP; Heeren RMA; Brunelle A; Laprévote O; Desbenoit N; Robbe MF; Stoeckli M; et al. imzML--a common data format for the flexible exchange and processing of mass spectrometry imaging data. Journal of proteomics 2012, 75 (16), 5106–5110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (123).Buck A; Heijs B; Beine B; Schepers J; Cassese A; Heeren RMA; McDonnell LA; Henkel C; Walch A; Balluff B Round robin study of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem 2018, 410 (23), 5969–5980. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (124).McDonnell LA; Rompp A; Balluff B; Heeren RM; Albar JP; Andren PE; Corthals GL; Walch A; Stoeckli M Discussion point: reporting guidelines for mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015, 407 (8), 2035–2045. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8322-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (125).Spraggins JM; Schwamborn K; Heeren RMA; Eberlin LS The Importance of Clinical Tissue Imaging. Clin Mass Spectrom 2019, 12, 47–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinms.2019.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (126).Leung F; Eberlin LS; Schwamborn K; Heeren RMA; Winograd N; Cooks RG Mass Spectrometry-Based Tissue Imaging: The Next Frontier in Clinical Diagnostics? Clin Chem 2019, 65 (4), 510–513. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.289694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (127).Yang E; Dufresne M; Chaurand P Enhancing ganglioside species detection for MALDI-TOF imaging mass spectrometry in negative reflectron mode. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2019, 437, 3–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (128).Kaya I; Brinet D; Michno W; Baskurt M; Zetterberg H; Blenow K; Hanrieder J Novel Trimodal MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry (IMS3) at 10 mum Reveals Spatial Lipid and Peptide Correlates Implicated in Abeta Plaque Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chem Neurosci 2017, 8 (12), 2778–2790. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (129).Kaya I; Jennische E; Dunevall J; Lange S; Ewing AG; Malmberg P; Baykal AT; Fletcher JS Spatial Lipidomics Reveals Region and Long Chain Base Specific Accumulations of Monosialogangliosides in Amyloid Plaques in Familial Alzheimer’s Disease Mice (5xFAD) Brain. ACS chemical neuroscience 2020, 11 (1), 14–24. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (130).Barre FPY; Paine MRL; Flinders B; Trevitt AJ; Kelly PD; Ait-Belkacem R; Garcia JP; Creemers LB; Stauber J; Vreeken RJ; et al. Enhanced Sensitivity Using MALDI Imaging Coupled with Laser Postionization (MALDI-2) for Pharmaceutical Research. Anal Chem 2019, 91 (16), 10840–10848. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (131).Dufresne M; Thomas A; Breault-Turcot J; Masson JF; Chaurand P Silver-assisted laser desorption ionization for high spatial resolution imaging mass spectrometry of olefins from thin tissue sections. Anal Chem 2013, 85 (6), 3318–3324. DOI: 10.1021/ac3037415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (132).Patti GJ; Shriver LP; Wassif CA; Woo HK; Uritboonthai W; Apon J; Manchester M; Porter FD; Siuzdak G Nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS) imaging of brain cholesterol metabolites in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Neuroscience 2010, 170 (3), 858–864. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (133).Cobice DF; Mackay CL; Goodwin RJ; McBride A; Langridge-Smith PR; Webster SP; Walker BR; Andrew R Mass spectrometry imaging for dissecting steroid intracrinology within target tissues. Anal Chem 2013, 85 (23), 11576–11584. DOI: 10.1021/ac402777k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (134).Muller L; Baldwin K; Barbacci DC; Jackson SN; Roux A; Balaban CD; Brinson BE; McCully MI; Lewis EK; Schultz JA; et al. Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometric Imaging of Endogenous Lipids from Rat Brain Tissue Implanted with Silver Nanoparticles. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2017, 28 (8), 1716–1728. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1665-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (135).Nezhad ZS; Salazar JP; Pryce RS; Munter LM; Chaurand P Absolute quantification of cholesterol from thin tissue sections by silver-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem 2022, 414 (23), 6947–6954. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04262-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
