Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2025 Apr 23;11(4):001388. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388

Molecular epidemiology and emergence of sequence type 25 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in pigs in the Netherlands (2013–2020): a global comparative analysis with human and pig isolates

Soe Yu Naing 1, Aldert Zomer 1, Linda van der Graaf-van Bloois 1, Manon Houben 2, Karin Junker 2, Otto Schreurs 3, Annet Heuvelink 2, Jaap A Wagenaar 1,4,*, Jobke van Hout 2
PMCID: PMC12018708  PMID: 40266657

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp), a ubiquitous pathogen found in diverse ecological niches, poses a threat to human and animal health. Hypervirulent Kp (hvKp) is concerning for its acquisition of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes through plasmids. This study investigates hvKp as a cause of septicaemia in piglets in the Netherlands and examines the role of plasmids in virulence and host association. We collected 41 Kp isolates cultured from necropsies submitted from 15 different farms (2013–2020) and sequenced them using long-read sequencing. We identified sequence type (ST) 25 as the dominant Kp (67%, 10/15 farms) associated with septicaemia in pigs in the Netherlands. ST25 isolates displayed a hypervirulent profile, including the K2 hyper-capsule type and carried an iuc3 virulence plasmid. Further analysis revealed two ST25 clonal groups: CG25 and CG3804, a novel porcine clone. Multidrug resistance was identified in CG25 isolates from five pig farms. There was one colistin-resistant isolate carrying mcr-1 on a plasmid. Comparative genomic analysis was performed by including a large dataset of related publicly available Kp genomes from ST25 humans (n=230) and pigs (n=12) of all STs for phylogenetic and plasmid analysis. Pangenomic analysis revealed significantly higher iuc3 prevalence in global CG25 pig isolates (98%, 40/41) compared to humans (10%, 24/234) correlating with their enhanced virulence (scores 3–4 vs 0–1). The study highlights ST25 hvKp causing septicaemia in piglets in the Netherlands for the first time. Aerobactin lineage iuc3 on a plasmid is associated with infections in pigs and is responsible for an increased virulence score.

Keywords: aerobactin plasmid, antimicrobial resistance, emerging infectious diseases, hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae, iuc3, septicaemia, whole-genome sequencing


Impact Statement

This study addresses a critical knowledge gap in the molecular epidemiology of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in animals, using comparative genomics to highlight the emergence of hypervirulent sequence type 25 Kp in pigs from the Netherlands. We compared these strains with global human and pig isolates, revealing the presence of iuc3 plasmids in pig isolates, which have also been identified in some human clinical isolates. This finding underscores a potential public health threat, as these plasmids may introduce hypervirulence through horizontal gene transfer. The detection of multidrug-resistant strains further amplifies this threat, with resistance genes potentially complicating treatment in both humans and animals.

Data Summary

All the genomes have been submitted and achieved under the European Nucleotide Archive project ENA PRJEB72410.

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium that widely inhabits various ecological niches, including the human oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract, the digestive system of animals, soil and water [1]. It ranks among the top three causes of antimicrobial resistance-related deaths in humans worldwide [2] and remains a common nosocomial pathogen. The most well-known strain, classical Klebsiella pneumoniae (cKp), is responsible for the majority of hospital-acquired infections and is often multidrug resistant, posing a significant risk to immunocompromised individuals [3].

In recent decades, a new pathotype known as hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) has emerged, primarily associated with community-acquired infections in humans but now becoming the dominant nosocomial pathogen in some health systems [4]. Unlike cKp, hvKp causes metastatic infections and is associated with high mortality rates. The first documented case of hvKp dates back to the mid-1980s when it was identified in healthy individuals in Taiwan, linked to pyogenic liver abscesses and septic endophthalmitis [5].

While hvKp strains were previously predominant in Asia and rarely resistant to antibiotics such as carbapenems, a recent report from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control highlighted the emergence of hvKp strains carrying carbapenemase genes in the European Union (EU) or the European Economic Area (EEA) countries [6]. Their risk assessment regarding the further spread of these hypervirulent strains concluded that the risk was high in healthcare settings. The rise of hvKp, particularly carbapenem-resistant hvKp, is concerning due to its association with higher morbidity and mortality [7]. Thus, it is crucial to accurately detect and characterize hvKp strains.

HvKp strains can be identified by combining both a phenotypic string test to examine the mucoid phenotype of bacterial colonies (referred to as the hypermucoviscous phenotype) and a molecular approach to detect mobile genetic element-encoded accessory genes, namely, yersiniabactin (ybt), aerobactin (iuc), colibactin (clb) and/or salmochelin (iro) [8]. Additionally, they are characterized by specific capsular polysaccharide antigens (K1, K2, K5, K20, K54 and K57), with K1 and K2 accounting for 70% of global hvKp cases [9]. Nassif et al. demonstrated that the existence of a ~180 kbp plasmid carrying aerobactin and its receptor protein in Kp strains was correlated with virulence and suggested that the siderophore aerobactin that scavenges host iron is an essential factor of pathogenicity in Kp. This suggests that the acquisition of virulence genes, typically through plasmids, has led to the emergence of hvKp [10].

Our understanding of the sources and circulation of hvKp strains and their plasmids in various ecological niches remains limited. A ‘One Health’ study conducted in the Italian city of Pavia scrutinized over 3,000 genomes from hospitals, pets, farms, livestock, plants and water sources. The findings indicate that humans serve as the primary reservoir of infections in hospitals, implying that the transmission of animal and environmental strains to humans resulting in nosocomial infections is limited [11]. Nevertheless, continuous monitoring of hvKp data from all available sources can provide insights into the prevalence, transmission, ecology and plasmid evolution of hvKp. Currently, data on hvKp strains other than human clinical isolates are limited, emphasizing the need to identify and report global problem clones in animals and the environment.

In swine, septicaemia cases attributed to Kp are rare. Outbreaks in piglets have only been reported in Australia [12] and the UK [13], and most cases are sporadic in the UK [11]. These studies reported that similar septicaemia outbreaks in piglets were associated with Kp sequence type (ST) 25.

In this study, we report our passive surveillance data of septicaemia cases caused by Kp in swine in the Netherlands for the first time. In addition, we describe the molecular epidemiology of these cases and determine their genetic relatedness to human and other pig strains and investigate the role of plasmids in virulence and resistance.

Methods

This retrospective study in the Netherlands investigated Kp cultured from necropsies of piglets submitted to Royal Gezondheidsdienst voor Dieren (GD) Animal Health Service, by 15 different pig farms experiencing sudden deaths in piglets (2013–2020). Spleen, brain and lung tissues were collected from affected piglets during post-mortem examination (one to six isolates per submission per farm). To minimize overrepresentation and sampling bias, proportions were calculated based on the farm level (n=15). Bacterial species were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (MALDI Biotyper, Bruker Daltonics GmbH and Co. KG, Bremen, Germany). A string test was used to determine a hypermucoviscous phenotype (>5 mm stretch of the colony when the colony was picked up with a loop). DNA isolation was performed using the DNeasy® UltraClean® Microbial kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The isolated DNA was quantified with the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity assay using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer. Long-read sequencing libraries were prepared with the Rapid Barcoding Kit 96 SQK-RBK110.96, and the barcoded samples were sequenced on a MinION device using flow cell type R9.4.1 (FLO-MIN 106D) (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK). All sequences were trimmed with TrimGalore v0.4.4 [14], assembled using Flye v2.9 with default parameters [15] and annotated with Prokka v1.11 [16]. The quality of genomes was checked with CheckM v1.1.3 [17], and only genomes with a contamination threshold of <5% and a completeness threshold of >94% were included in the analysis (Table S2, available in the online Supplementary Material). The comparative genome analysis was performed using Roary v3.13.0 with a minimum of 95% identity [18]. The genomes were analysed using Kleborate v2.2.0 [19] to detect virulence and resistance genes, whereas Kaptive Web v1.3.0 using its databases v3.0.0b6 was used to type K and O-loci [20,21]. The virulence score (0–5) was determined by the Kleborate tool as follows: 0 = none present; 1 = yersiniabactin ybt only; 2 = colibactin clb without aerobactin iucC (regardless of ybt); 3 = aerobactin iucC only; 4 = aerobactin iucC and yersiniabactin ybt without colibactin clb; and 5 = iucC, ybt and clb.

Core-genome multi-locus sequence typing and LIN code sub-lineage analysis

Core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) was performed using Kleborate v2.2.0 with the Kp Institut Pasteur cgMLST scheme via the BIGSdb platform [22,23]. Thresholds for allele calling and cluster definition followed the scheme’s default parameters (≥95% locus completeness). To resolve fine-scale population structure within ST25, hierarchical clustering of SNPs was used to assign the LIN code, clonal group (CG), and sublineage (SL), as implemented in Kleborate [19,23].

Plasmid typing and analysis

For plasmid analysis, Bandage v0.8.1 was used to check the assembly graphs of plasmid contigs [24], resulting in 35 closed genomes. Plasmid contigs were then extracted using Geneious Prime 2022.0.2 and annotated with Prokka v1.11 [16]. These plasmid contigs were analysed using Roary v3.13.0 [18], PlasmidFinder v2.1 [25] and ResFinder v4.0 [26].

The representative plasmid contig containing aerobactin (21S00310-1contig_3) was visualized using the KpVR web-based tool v1.0 (https://db-mml.sjtu.edu.cn/KpVR/) to analyse virulence plasmids [27]. This tool provides replicon typing, virulence/resistance gene annotation and visualization of plasmid architecture. KpVR uses a curated database (repDB) that includes IncFIBK subtypes and integrates AbST/SmST schemes for iuc and iro lineage typing. For this study, all IncFIBK plasmids were analysed using KpVR, which performs nt identity/coverage-based searches to assign replicons (e.g. IncFIB[K]/IncFII), maps virulence modules (e.g. iucABCD-iutA) and generates graphical plasmid overviews. The tool’s output includes replicon alleles, type four secretion system (T4SS) clusters and co-localized resistance genes (e.g. heavy metal resistance loci). The plasmid pCY814036-iucA (GenBank accession no. CP093152) [28], identified from an ST25 hvKp strain isolated from a Chinese patient, was included in the plasmid analysis. This plasmid carries both multidrug-resistant (MDR) genes and the virulence-associated iuc operon on a single conjugative plasmid. We included this particular plasmid from China as it serves as a reference for ST25 aerobactin lineage iuc3, allowing us to compare and determine if our iuc3 plasmids from pig isolates share similarities with the iuc plasmid isolated from humans.

Comparative genome analysis

In addition, we analysed a large collection of Kp ST25 genomes both sequenced in this study (n=41) and reported previously. The collection included ST25 genomes of human origin (n=234) and pig origin (n=12) from public databases (accessed on 15 November 2022) curated in Pathogenwatch [29] and Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC) [30] to examine global emergence and dissemination of ST25 hvKp isolates. Only genomes sequenced in this study (n=41) have been submitted and achieved under project ENA PRJEB72410.

Phylogenetic tree construction

The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) was constructed using Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch), and Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6.0 [31] was utilized to visualize the metadata of the genomes in a mid-rooted phylogenetic tree. The global phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed using a newick tree output from Pathogenwatch and annotated using Microreact [32]. A plasmid tree (Fig. S1) was constructed using RAxML v8.2.4 [33] with the BINCAT model for binary gene presence–absence data, 100 bootstrap replicates and rapid bootstrapping followed by maximum likelihood tree search. The minimum spanning tree (MST) (Fig. S2) was generated using PhyloViz v2.0 [34] by applying the goeBURST algorithm [35] to a core genome SNP alignment of Kp isolates from this study produced with Parsnp v1.7 [36] and SNP-sites [37], with nodes representing strains and edge lengths proportional to the number of allelic differences in the core genome.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree and metadata of sepsis-causing Kp in pigs from the Netherlands (2013–2020). Black circles represent genes present on plasmids. Black stars represent the presence of rmpA genes. For the string test column, + means positive for string test, and – means negative for string test. blaSHV, beta-lactam resistance; fosA, fosfomycin resistance; oqxA, oqxB, efflux pump; aadA, aph(3′)-la, aph(3′)-lb, aph(3′)-ld, aph(6′)ld, aminoglycoside resistance; blaTEM, beta-lactam resistance; dfrA, trimethoprim resistance; floR, chloramphenicol resistance; sul1, sul2, sulphonamide resistance; tet(A), tet(B), tet(D), tetracycline resistance; lnu(G), lincosamide resistance; mcr-1.1, colistin resistance; mph(B), macrolide resistance; iuc3, iuc1, aerobactin synthesis; iro1, iro3, Salmochelin; ybt, Yersiniabactin. Tree scale: 1,000 means that branch lengths are scaled by a factor of 1,000.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2. Global phylogeny of ST25 isolates from different hosts and different countries (leaf node tip colour represents the host [isolation source; NL (the Netherlands) pig cluster isolates represent the isolates from this study].

Fig. 2.

Results

Study population

A total of 41 Kp isolates were recovered from 15 different farms that submitted pigs for post-mortem examination due to sudden pig deaths (2013–2020). The median age of piglets was 2 weeks (interquartile range: 1 week, range: 1–104 weeks). Septicaemia cases were confirmed using a case definition described in a previous study [38]: sudden death in pigs with lesions consistent with septicaemia and pure/predominant growth of Kp isolated from internal organs of diseased animals. Most cases were submitted from indoor farms in the southern part of the Netherlands where pig density is high. Fig. 3 depicts the spatial distribution of Kp-associated septicaemia cases by postal code region. Table 1 summarizes isolate information and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics.

Fig. 3. The distribution map of Kp isolates cultured from pigs submitted for post-mortem examination (n=41) from pig farms in the Netherlands (2013–2020).

Fig. 3.

Table 1. Summary of Kp isolates associated with septicaemia in the Netherlands, 2013–2020.

Isolate Age (weeks) Source from pigs Farm Year Month MLST cgMLST String test Virulence
22S00272-1 na Lung 2 2013 January ST292 CG292 Negative 3
18S04225-1 na Brain 3 2015 July ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
18S04230-1 2 Brain 3 2015 August ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
18S04232-1 na Brain 3 2015 March ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
22S00273-1 na Spleen 3 2015 August ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
22S00275-1 2 Brain 3 2015 August ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
22S00276-1 na Spleen 3 2015 August ST25 CG3804 Positive 3
18S04231-1 2 Brain 1 2017 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00308-1 2 Brain 1 2017 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00310-1 na Submitted culture 1 2017 September ST25 CG25 Positive 4
18S04229-1 3 Spleen 4 2017 July ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00303-1 3 Spleen 4 2017 July ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00306-1 3 Spleen 4 2017 July ST25 CG25 Positive 4
18S04228-1 na Spleen 5 2017 August ST1480 na Negative 3
18S04226-1 3 Brain 6 2017 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
18S04227-1 3.14 Spleen 7 2017 October ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00283-1 2 Joint 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00290-1 2 Spleen 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00295-1 2 Spleen 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00296-1 2 Spleen 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00299-1 2 Spleen 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00302-1 2 Joint 8 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00280-1 2 Brain 9 2018 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00281-1 2 Brain 9 2018 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00289-1 2 Spleen 9 2018 June ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00279-1 na Spleen 14 2018 November ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00285-1 na Liver 14 2018 November ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00298-1 na Brain 14 2018 November ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00292-1 2 Brain 10 2019 March ST5 CG5 Negative 4
22S00282-1 6 Spleen 11 2019 June ST37 CG37 Negative 3
22S00291-1 na na 12 2019 December ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00300-1 1 Brain 1 2020 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00294-1 104 na 13 2020 July ST219 CG107 Negative 3
22S00278-1 na Brain 14 2020 April ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00287-1 na Brain 14 2020 April ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00293-1 na Brain 14 2020 April ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00301-1 na Brain 14 2020 April ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00286-1 na Ascites 15 2020 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00297-1 na Mesentery 15 2020 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00284-1 na Mesentery 15 2020 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4
22S00288-1 na Ascites 15 2020 August ST25 CG25 Positive 4

na, not applicable. The virulence score (0–5) was determined by the Kleborate tool as follows: 0, none present; 1, ybt only; 2, clb without iucC (regardless of ybt); 3, iucC only; 4, iucC and ybt without clb; 5, iucC, ybt and clb.

Genomic information of ST25 hypervirulent strains in the Netherlands

Molecular characterization of the Kp isolates revealed that multi-locus sequence type (MLST) ST25 was dominant in the majority of farms (67%, 10/15) in this study. The remaining five farms showed diverse MLST types: ST5 (farm 10), ST37 (farm 11), ST219 (farm 13), ST292 (farm 2) and ST1480 (farm 5). This variation in STs corresponded to distinct clustering patterns based on the origin of isolates, including the farm and geographic region, capsule type (K) and hypervirulent determinants such as aerobactin, salmochelin and yersiniabactin (Fig. 1). ST25 isolates were not genetically closed to other STs as indicated by the MST shown in Fig. S2.

Unlike isolates with different STs, ST25 isolates displayed hypervirulence characteristics, including the presence of the K2 polysaccharide capsule type and virulence-associated genes encoding aerobactin (iuc), yersiniabactin (ybt2) and salmochelin (iro3). Kaptive results predicated a capsule null phenotype due to truncations in critical genes such as wzi and wzy. The ‘capsule null’ prediction in ST25 isolates, despite K2 typing, indicates capsule-deficient Klebsiella lineages. All ST25 isolates demonstrated a hypermucoviscous phenotype, confirmed by positive results in the phenotypic string test (Table 1). All non-ST25 isolates displayed a negative string test, indicating the absence of hypermucoviscosity. Non-ST25 isolates did not carry any aerobactin, salmochelin and yersiniabactin genes except one ST219 genome. Kleborate analysis showed two distinct clonal groups of ST25: CG25 and CG3804. These clusters align with LIN code SLs SL25 and SL3804 (Table S1), respectively. All isolates within CG25 exhibited a virulence score of 4, and those within CG3804 had a virulence score of 3. As seen in Fig. 1, all CG25 isolates, CG5 and CG 219 carried iuc allele iuc3, whereas CG3804 isolates carried iuc1. In terms of antibiotic resistance, blaSHV (providing intrinsic resistance to ampicillin and other β-lactams), the fosA gene (conferring fosfomycin resistance) and the OqxAB gene coding for efflux pump, responsible for MDR, are encoded on the chromosome in all Kp isolates.

MDR, defined as not susceptible to three distinct antibiotic groups or more, was identified in CG25 isolates from five farms (farms 1, 2, 8, 9 and 15) carrying resistance genes of streptomycin, spectinomycin, tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulphonamide (Fig. 1). A notable finding was the detection of one colistin-resistant hvKp CG25 isolate harbouring the mcr-1 gene on a plasmid (22S000291-1, farm ID 12). No carbapenemase genes were detected in any isolate. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) conferring resistance to aminoglycoside, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole, colistin, macrolide and tetracycline were also encoded on plasmids.

Hypervirulence gene presence on plasmids

Complete genome analysis was conducted to precisely determine the location of virulence genes, whether on plasmids or the chromosome. Plasmid typing revealed a clustering pattern based on Inc types, showcasing a variety of plasmid types associated with virulence genes and ARGs (Fig. S1).

Plasmid analysis confirmed that CG25 hvKp isolates had acquired aerobactin, encoded by the iuc3 lineage of the aerobactin locus operon, named iuc3 plasmid in this study. The aerobactin genes responsible for Kp’s iron scavenging from the host, iucABCD and iutA genes, were located on this plasmid in all CG25 isolates. This plasmid type belonged to the F plasmid incompatibility groups IncFIB(K) and IncFII (Fig. 4). Furthermore, it contains the Fec-like iron(III) dicitrate transport system, a T4SS, as well as several heavy metal resistance genes including arsenic and copper.

Fig. 4. Aerobactin virulence iuc3 plasmid carrying iuc3 genes from CG25 hvKp isolates from piglets in the Netherlands (21S00310-1contig_3).

Fig. 4.

Phylogeny of global ST25 isolates from humans and pigs

As virulence and antimicrobial resistance in pig isolates appear to be associated with specific plasmids such as iuc3 plasmid in ST25 isolates, we added publicly available ST25 Kp isolates mostly from human and pig sources to our analysis. The global phylogenetic tree of ST25 reveals clear differences between Dutch hvKp isolates and those from other parts of the world (Fig. 2). This pangenome analysis highlights two clonal groups: CG25 and CG3804. Within the CG25 lineage, two main clades are present. One is comprised of human isolates not carrying aerobactin, while the other includes pig and human isolates that carry aerobactin. In general, pig isolate clusters are associated with their geographical origin. Dutch pig isolates of the CG25 lineage were genetically different from the other pig isolates originated from the UK, China, Malaysia and the USA (Fig. 2). In comparison to our Dutch study isolates, pig isolates from China and the UK are hvKp carrying iuc3 plasmids. It is noteworthy that a similar iuc3 plasmid has been identified in MDR ST25 hvKp isolates [CY814036, and the plasmid pCY814036-iucA (GenBank accession no. CP093152) [28]] from neonatal children in China (Fig. S1). Despite sharing the same ST, the majority of CG25 isolates (84.1%, 197/234) from humans display lower virulence scores (0–1), whereas all CG25 isolated from pigs and CG3804 isolates from both humans and pigs had higher virulence score [3,4]. On the other hand, iuc3 prevalence was higher in global pig isolates (98%, 40/41) compared to humans (10%, 24/234) correlating with their enhanced virulence (scores 3–4 vs 0–1). The detailed description of global ST25 isolates is summarized in Table S1.

Discussion

This is the first retrospective study describing hvKp as the causative agent of septicaemia in piglets in the Netherlands. Similar to previous septicaemia outbreaks in the UK [13] and Australia [12], our genomic analysis revealed that Dutch pig isolates shared the same ST25. We observed the presence of two distinct clusters within ST25, namely, CG25 and CG3804. Dutch CG25 pig isolates formed a cohesive and genetically distinct cluster from other pig and human isolates, indicating the emergence of an animal species-specific CG25 hvKp in the Netherlands. CG3804 appeared to be a novel clone in pigs, clustering alongside 11 human isolates of CG3804 from different regions including Asia, Europe, America, Africa and Australia, suggesting a clonal spread of CG3804 worldwide. All CG3804 isolates carried aerobactin lineage iuc1 and iro1 (salmochelin) virulence genes on plasmids, while CG25 isolates carried aerobactin lineage iuc3 on plasmids with IncFIB(K) and IncFII replicon. Similarly, Lam et al. [8] demonstrated that iuc3 plasmids were present in CG25, CG35 and CG231 isolates. Consistent with our findings, the iuc3 lineage was linked to IncFIB(K) and IncFII replicons [8]. In addition, CG25 and CG3804 isolates had virulence scores of 4 (aerobactin and yersiniabactin) and 3 (aerobactin only), respectively. This difference in virulence score between CG25 and CG3804 isolates can be attributed to the presence of a distinct iuc3 plasmid in all pig CG25 isolates and iuc1 plasmids in CG3804 isolates. Despite sharing the same CG25, in comparison to human isolates, all pig isolates contained iuc3 virulence plasmids. The pangenomic analysis showed an association between iuc3 virulence plasmids and host, as CG25 human isolates lacking iuc3 plasmids exhibited lower virulence score (0–1), while mainly CG25 pig isolates containing the presence of iuc3 increased the virulence score to 4.

A recent study conducted in Norway reported a high frequency of iuc3 plasmids in Kp found within healthy fattening pig populations in the country [39]. Additionally, another study from Italy highlighted the presence of iuc3 plasmids in raw pork meat and its processing environment within two artisanal ready-to-eat food productions [40]. Subsequently, their findings revealed strong similarities of iuc3-carrying plasmids found in the artisanal food production chain and those present in Kp strains isolated from both humans and pig livestock originating from the same geographical area. This finding suggests the possibility of a transfer of virulence plasmids across strains found in different host species such as humans and pigs.

It is well established that aerobactin plays a crucial role in the pathogenicity of extracellular pathogens, as observed in septicaemia and urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and Kp [41]. Previous studies have highlighted that biomarkers including salmochelin, iro, and aerobactin, iucABCD, as well as a siderophore enterobactin receptor, fepA, and a ferric aerobactin receptor, iutA, are associated with liver invasion in human isolates. Interestingly, iuc3-harbouring plasmids are notably less present in human Kp isolates. Less than 1% of healthy human isolates in Norway [39] and 10% of global CG25 human isolates in the current study carried iuc3 plasmids. A European study on carbapenem-resistant Kp (CRKP; EuSCAPE) also showed that only 0.7% of human isolates (11 out of 1,505 CRKP human isolates) carried iuc3 plasmids [42]. Our results align with a study conducted in Germany, which found that aerobactin of lineage iuc3 was exclusively detected in Kp isolates from domestic pigs and wild boars within the country [43]. These findings suggest that iuc3 plasmids are commonly found in pigs and hvKp CG25 may have invasive potential, causing septicaemia in pigs and invasive infections in humans, particularly when the aerobactin iuc3 plasmid is present.

We could not determine when and how hvKp strains from pigs acquired iuc3 plasmid due to our limited dataset. It is still unclear whether hvKp strains are transmitted between different hosts or if plasmids are transferred between strains instead. This information can be helpful in elucidating the mechanisms behind the evolution of virulence plasmids.

Convergent plasmids, a plasmid that is formed by fusion of two or more smaller plasmids, with MDR and hvKp determinants have been found in China where the same CG25 and the same plasmid iuc3 converged with multiple ARGs were recovered from neonatal sepsis case in children [44]. These fusion plasmids are indicative of MDR hypervirulent isolates (e.g. a single plasmid carrying iuc virulence genes together with ESBL and/or carbapenemase genes). In our study, we did not identify convergent plasmids in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, some CG25 isolates in our study displayed MDR, carrying resistance genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulphonamide on a different plasmid. It is important to note that one mcr-1 plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant hvKp isolate was recovered from pigs in the Netherlands. Even though convergent plasmids have not yet been found in the Netherlands, MDR hvKp circulating in food-producing animals should raise concerns and call for early reporting and monitoring. Given the increasing prevalence of high-risk clones such as ST11 or ST23 in hospital settings in EU/EEA regions, it is also important to monitor high-risk clones occurring in animals and the environment [7]. In this context, reporting unusual cases from animals plays a pivotal role in early detection. In the Netherlands, early detection programmes are in place for unusual cases, and when combined with genomic analyses like in this study, they provide a framework for genomic surveillance of emerging hvKp and virulence and resistance-associated plasmids.

On the other hand, our study has several limitations. Firstly, there is geographic sampling bias due to submissions predominantly from locations with high pig density in the Netherlands. Moreover, there are variations in the number of pigs submitted per farm and variation in the number of isolates per submission, with some submitting only one animal while others submitted up to six animals, potentially skewing the dataset. To reduce over-representativeness and sampling bias, we presented our data on a farm level instead of isolate level. Since this is a retrospective study based on diagnostic samples, we did not have clinical data and epidemiological data including on-farm risk factor data, which is another constraint on the interpretation of our findings. Moreover, there were no isolates collected from healthy animals to compare, and further research should look into whether healthy pigs carry the same hvKp strain. Despite the inherent limitations of a retrospective passive surveillance study, our research provides valuable information on the molecular epidemiology of hvKp, enhancing our understanding of its plasmid ecology and genetic diversity.

To conclude, our findings suggest that the presence of plasmids carrying iuc3 lineage is associated with pig as a host. Further research is needed to understand the role of plasmids encoding iuc3 in hvKp virulence and transmission. This information will be crucial for understanding the ecology and epidemiological dynamics of hvKp from different sources.

Supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-11-01388-s001.pdf (802.4KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388
Uncited Supplementary Material 2.
mgen-11-01388-s002.xls (400KB, xls)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388
Uncited Supplementary Material 3.
mgen-11-01388-s003.xlsx (22.6KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388

Acknowledgements

We thank Heleen Zweerus and Arjen J. Timmerman for their assistance with handling microbiological samples.

Abbreviations

ARGs

antimicrobial resistance genes

cgMLST

core-genome multi-locus sequence typing

cKp

classical Klebsiella pneumoniae

CRKP

carbapenem-resistant Kp

EEA

European Economic Area

EU

European Union

hvKp

hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae

Kp

Klebsiella pneumoniae

MDR

multidrug resistance

MLST

multi-locus sequence type

MST

minimum spanning tree

SL

sublineage

ST

sequence type

T4SS

type four secretion system

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by the Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University.

Ethical statement: Ethical approval was not required for this study since the bacterial isolates used in this study were obtained as part of routine diagnostics.

Author contributions: S.Y.N. performed the analysis, interpretated the data and wrote the manuscript draft. The study was designed together by J.v.H., J.A.W. and A.Z. J.A.W., J.v.H., M.H., A.H., K.J., A.Z., O.S. and L.v.d.G.B. were responsible for acquisition and quality control of data. All authors reviewed the draft manuscript and approved the final article.

Contributor Information

Soe Yu Naing, Email: s.y.naing@uu.nl.

Aldert Zomer, Email: a.l.zomer@uu.nl.

Linda van der Graaf-van Bloois, Email: l.vandergraaf@uu.nl.

Manon Houben, Email: mhouben@beststarmeat.com.

Karin Junker, Email: k.junker@gdanimalhealth.com.

Otto Schreurs, Email: ojm.schreurs@gmail.com.

Annet Heuvelink, Email: a.heuvelink@gdanimalhealth.com.

Jaap A. Wagenaar, Email: j.wagenaar@uu.nl.

Jobke van Hout, Email: j.v.hout@gdanimalhealth.com.

References

  • 1.Wyres KL, Holt KE. Klebsiella pneumoniae as a key trafficker of drug resistance genes from environmental to clinically important bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018;45:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022;399:629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paczosa MK, Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:629–661. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li L, Li S, Wei X, Lu Z, Qin X, et al. Infection with carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: clinical, virulence, and molecular epidemiological characteristics. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12:124. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01331-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu Y-C, Cheng D-L, Lin C-L. Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess associated with septic endophthalmitis. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:1913–1916. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1986.00360220057011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Risk Assessment Emergence of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae ST23 carrying carbapenemase genes in EU/EEA countries - first update [Internet] 2024. [27-March-2024]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/risk-assessment-emergence-hypervirulent-klebsiella-pneumoniae-eu-eea accessed.
  • 7.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Risk Assessment Emergence of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae ST23 carrying carbapenemase genes in EU/EEA countries [Internet] 2021. [27-June-2023]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/risk-assessment-emergence-hypervirulent-klebsiella-pneumoniae-eu-eea accessed.
  • 8.Lam MMC, Wyres KL, Judd LM, Wick RR, Jenney A, et al. Tracking key virulence loci encoding aerobactin and salmochelin siderophore synthesis in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Genome Med. 2018;10:77. doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0587-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Russo TA, Marr CM. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32:e00001-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nassif X, Fournier JM, Arondel J, Sansonetti PJ. Mucoid phenotype of Klebsiella pneumoniae is a plasmid-encoded virulence factor. Infect Immun. 1989;57:546–552. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.2.546-552.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thorpe HA, Booton R, Kallonen T, Gibbon MJ, Couto N, et al. A large-scale genomic snapshot of Klebsiella spp. Isolates in Northern Italy reveals limited transmission between clinical and non-clinical settings. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:2054–2067. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01263-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bowring BG, Fahy VA, Morris A, Collins AM. An unusual culprit: Klebsiella pneumoniae causing septicaemia outbreaks in neonatal pigs? Vet Microbiol. 2017;203:267–270. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bidewell CA, Williamson SM, Rogers J, Tang Y, Ellis RJ, et al. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae subspecies pneumoniae as a cause of septicaemia in pigs in England. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krueger F. Trim galore. A wrapper tool around cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. 2015. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/
  • 15.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lam MMC, Wick RR, Watts SC, Cerdeira LT, Wyres KL, et al. A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4188. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24448-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wyres KL, Wick RR, Gorrie C, Jenney A, Follador R, et al. Identification of Klebsiella capsule synthesis loci from whole genome data. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000102. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wick RR, Heinz E, Holt KE, Wyres KL. Kaptive Web: user-friendly capsule and lipopolysaccharide serotype prediction for Klebsiella genomes. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00197-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00197-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bialek-Davenet S, Criscuolo A, Ailloud F, Passet V, Jones L, et al. Genomic definition of hypervirulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal groups. Emerg Infect Dis . 2014;20:1812–1820. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.140206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hennart M, Guglielmini J, Bridel S, Maiden MCJ, Jolley KA, et al. A dual barcoding approach to bacterial strain nomenclature: genomic taxonomy of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msac135. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tian D, Wang M, Zhou Y, Hu D, Ou H-Y, et al. Genetic diversity and evolution of the virulence plasmids encoding aerobactin and salmochelin in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Virulence. 2021;12:1323–1333. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1924019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xia P, Yi M, Yuan Y, Huang J, Yang B, et al. Coexistence of multidrug resistance and virulence in a single conjugative plasmid from a hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate of sequence type 25. mSphere. 2022;7:e00477–22. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00477-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Argimón S, David S, Underwood A, Abrudan M, Wheeler NE, et al. Rapid genomic characterization and global surveillance of Klebsiella using Pathogenwatch. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:S325–S335. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb Genom. 2016;2 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nascimento M, Sousa A, Ramirez M, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, et al. PHYLOViZ 2.0: providing scalable data integration and visualization for multiple phylogenetic inference methods. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:128–129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Francisco AP, Bugalho M, Ramirez M, Carriço JA. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014;15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom. 2016;2 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williamson S, Bidewell C, AbuOun M. Update on Klebsiella pneumoniae septicaemia outbreaks in preweaned pigs. Vet Rec. 2019;184:580–583. doi: 10.1136/vr.l3164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaspersen H, Franklin-Alming FV, Hetland MAK, Bernhoff E, Löhr IH, et al. Highly conserved composite transposon harbouring aerobactin iuc3 in Klebsiella pneumoniae from pigs. Microb Genom. 2023;9 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Crippa C, Pasquali F, Rodrigues C, De Cesare A, Lucchi A, et al. Genomic features of Klebsiella isolates from artisanal ready-to-eat food production facilities. Sci Rep. 2023;13:10957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37821-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhu J, Wang T, Chen L, Du H. Virulence factors in hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:642484. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.642484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.David S, Reuter S, Harris SR, Glasner C, Feltwell T, et al. Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1919–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Klaper K, Hammerl JA, Rau J, Pfeifer Y, Werner G. Genome-based analysis of Klebsiella spp. isolates from animals and food products in Germany, 2013–2017. Pathogens. 2021;10:573. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao J, Zheng B, Xu H, Li J, Sun T, et al. Emergence of a NDM-1-producing ST25 Klebsiella pneumoniae strain causing neonatal sepsis in China. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:980191. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.980191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-11-01388-s001.pdf (802.4KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388
Uncited Supplementary Material 2.
mgen-11-01388-s002.xls (400KB, xls)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388
Uncited Supplementary Material 3.
mgen-11-01388-s003.xlsx (22.6KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001388

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES