Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1982 Nov;102(3):379–400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.379

Dominant X-Chromosome Nondisjunction Mutants of CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

Robert K Herman 1, Claire K Kari 1, Philip S Hartman 1
PMCID: PMC1201947  PMID: 6890921

Abstract

Eight dominant X-chromosome nondisjunction mutants have been identified and characterized. Hermaphrodites (XX) heterozygous for any one of the mutations produce 20–35% male (XO) self-progeny compared with the wild-type frequency of 0.2%. Seven of the eight mutants carry X-autosome translocations. Three of these, represented by mnT2, involve linkage group (LG) II and show severe crossover suppression for X-linked markers. The two half-translocations comprising mnT2 are separable and of very unequal size. The smaller one includes the left tip of X and the right end of LGII and can exist as a free duplication, being present in addition to the normal chromosome complement, in either hermaphrodites or males; it has no effect on X nondisjunction. The reciprocal half-translocation of mnT2 includes the bulk of both LGII and X chromosomes; it disjoins regularly from a normal LGII and confers the property of X-chromosome nondisjunction. A fourth translocation, mnT10(V;X), is also reciprocal and consists of half-translocations that recombine with V and X, respectively. Either half-translocation of mnT10 can exist in heterozygous form in the absence of the other to give heterozygous duplication-deficiency animals; the property of X-chromosome nondisjunction is conferred, in homozygotes as well as heterozygotes, solely by one of the half-translocations, which is deficient for the left tip of the X. The final three translocations have X breakpoints near the right end of X and autosomal breakpoints near the right end of LGIV, the left end of LGV and the right end of LGI, respectively. All three are homozygous inviable. Males hemizygous for the X portion of any of the seven translocations are viable and fertile. The final mutant, mn164, maps as a point at or near the left tip of the X and causes X-chromosome nondisjunction in both heterozygotes and homozygotes. In heterozygotes, mn164 promotes equational nondisjunction of itself but not its wild-type allele. The mutants are discussed in light of the holocentric nature of the C. elegans chromosomes. It is proposed that the left end of the X chromosome plays a critical structural role in the segregation of X chromosomes during meiosis in XX animals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandley A. C. Application of the "distributive pairing" hypothesis to problems of segregation in translocation heterozygotes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1965 Aug;52(2):247–258. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cox G. N., Laufer J. S., Kusch M., Edgar R. S. Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of Roller Mutants of CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1980 Jun;95(2):317–339. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.2.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldstein P., Triantaphyllou A. C. The ultrastructure of sperm development in the plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne hapla. J Ultrastruct Res. 1980 May;71(2):143–153. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(80)90102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hawley R. S. Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics. 1980 Mar;94(3):625–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herman T. S., Jones S. E. Systematic restaging in patients with Hodgkin's disease: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1978 Oct;42(4):1976–1982. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197810)42:4<1976::aid-cncr2820420442>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgkin J. A., Brenner S. Mutations causing transformation of sexual phenotype in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):275–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hodgkin J., Horvitz H. R., Brenner S. Nondisjunction Mutants of the Nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1979 Jan;91(1):67–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodgkin J. More sex-determination mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):649–664. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.3.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Horvitz H. R., Brenner S., Hodgkin J., Herman R. K. A uniform genetic nomenclature for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Sep;175(2):129–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00425528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horvitz H. R., Sulston J. E. Isolation and genetic characterization of cell-lineage mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Oct;96(2):435–454. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horvitz H. R., Sulston J. E. Isolation and genetic characterization of cell-lineage mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Oct;96(2):435–454. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meneely P. M., Herman R. K. Suppression and function of X-linked lethal and sterile mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):65–84. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NIGON V., BRUN J. L'évolution des structures nucléaires dans l'ovogenèse de Caenorhabditis elegans Maupas 1900. Chromosoma. 1955;7(2-3):129–169. doi: 10.1007/BF00329722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenbluth R. E., Baillie D. L. The genetic analysis of a reciprocal translocation, eT1(III; V), in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):415–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Waterston R. H., Thomson J. N., Brenner S. Mutants with altered muscle structure of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1980 Jun 15;77(2):271–302. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90475-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES