Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1982 Dec;102(4):751–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.4.751

Meiosis in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. III. the Effect of Orientation Disruptor (ord) on Gonial Mitotic and the Meiotic Divisions in Males

Hsiu-Ping P Lin 1, Kathleen Church 1
PMCID: PMC1201971  PMID: 6821250

Abstract

Orientation disruptor (ord), a meiotic mutant that is recombination defective in females and disjunction defective in males and females, has been analyzed using serial section electron and light microscopy. From analysis of primary spermatocytes we have confirmed that ord males are defective in some aspect of the mechanism(s) that holds sister chromatids together during meiosis. In addition, we have determined that ord causes high frequencies of nondisjunction during spermatogonial mitotic divisions, as well as during the meiotic divisions. Mitotic nondisjunction involves the large autosomes more frequently than the sex chromosomes or chromosome 4 and results in high frequencies of primary spermatocytes that are either monosomic or trisomic for chromosome 2 or 3. Abnormalities in spermatocyte cyst formation are also observed in males homozygous for ord. These abnormalities include loss of regulation of meiotic synchrony and the number of gonial cell divisions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Esposito M. S., Esposito R. E., Sandler L. The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:53–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Directory of members, Genetics Society of America. Genetics. 1980;94(4 Pt 2 Suppl):135–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gatti M., Santini G., Pimpinelli S., Olivieri G. Lack of spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1979 Feb;91(2):255–274. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldstein L. S. Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. melanogaster. Cell. 1981 Sep;25(3):591–602. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldstein L. S. Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1980;78(1):79–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00291909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lifschytz E., Hareven D. Gene expression and the control of spermatid morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 15;58(2):276–294. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin H. P., Ault J. G., Church K. Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosome identification and kinetochore microtubule numbers during the first and second meiotic divisions in males. Chromosoma. 1981;83(4):507–521. doi: 10.1007/BF00328276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mason J. M. Orientation disruptor (ord): a recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):545–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES