Abstract
Two polymorphic systems impinging on α-amylase in Drosophila pseudoobscura have been studied in laboratory populations maintained on medium in which the only carbohydrate source was starch (the substrate of amylase) and replicas maintained on medium in which the only carbohydrate source was maltose (the product of amylase). The two polymorphic systems were alleles at the structural gene (Amy) coding for the enzyme (allozymes) and variation in the tissue-specific expression along the adult midgut controlled by several genes. In the seven populations on maltose medium little consistent change was noted in either system. In the seven populations on starch medium, both polymorphisms exhibited selective changes. A midgut pattern of very limited expression of amylase rose in frequency in all starch populations, as did the frequency of the "fast" (1.00) Amy allele. The overall specific amylase activity did not differ between starch-adapted and maltose-adapted flies.—The results, along with previous studies, indicate that when a gene-enzyme system is specifically stressed in laboratory populations, allozymes often exhibit selective differences. Such results make the selectionist hypothesis at least tenable. Furthermore, the fact that both types of polymorphisms responded to selection indicates the role of structural gene vs. gene regulation changes in adaptive evolution is not an either/or question but one of relative roles and interactions.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (767.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- De Jong G., Scharloo W. Environmental determination of selective significance or neutrality of amylase variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1976 Sep;84(1):77–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dykhuizen D., Hartl D. L. Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics. 1980 Dec;96(4):801–817. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald J. F., Chambers G. K., David J., Ayala F. J. Adaptive response due to changes in gene regulation: a study with Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4562–4566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell J. R., Lichtenfels J. M. Population genetics of Drosophila amylase. I. Genetic control of tissue-specific expression in D. pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):603–612. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell J. R. Population genetics of Drosophila amylase. II. Geographic patterns in D. pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):613–622. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wills C., Nichols L. Single-gene heterosis in Drosophila revealed by inbreeding. Nature. 1971 Sep 10;233(5315):123–125. doi: 10.1038/233123a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamazaki T. Detection of single gene effect by inbreeding. Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 8;240(97):53–54. doi: 10.1038/newbio240053a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]