Abstract
In mating interactions in Paramecium caudatum, initial mating agglutination is strictly mating-type specific, but subsequent conjugating pair formation is not mating-type specific. Using this nonspecificity of pair formation, intersyngenic (intersibling species) pairs were induced by mixing four mating types of two different syngens. To distinguish intersyngenic pairs from intrasyngenic ones, the behavioral marker CNR (Takahashi 1979) was mainly used. Clones of intersyngenic hybrids showed high fertility and thus made feasible a genetic analysis of syngenic specificity of mating type. The syngenic specificities of E (even) mating types were found to be controlled by co-dominant multiple alleles at the Mt locus, and those of O (odd) mating types by interactions of co-dominant multiple alleles at two loci, MA and MB. Clones of heterozygotes express dual mating types. Mt is epistatic to MA and MB, and thus O mating types can be expressed only in the recessive homozygote (mt/mt) at the Mt locus. In addition, at least one allele each at the MA and MB loci must have a common syngen specificity for the expression of O types. Thus, when MA is homozygous for one syngen and MB is homozygous for another syngen, no mating type is expressed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Agatsuma T., Tsukii Y. Genetic control of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in Paramecium caudatum. Biochem Genet. 1980 Feb;18(1-2):77–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00504361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allen S. L., Weremiuk S. L. Intersyngenic variations in the esterases and acid phosphatases of Tetrahymena pyriformis. Biochem Genet. 1971 Apr;5(2):119–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00485640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiwatashi K. Determination and inheritance of mating type in Paramecium caudatum. Genetics. 1968 Mar;58(3):373–386. doi: 10.1093/genetics/58.3.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiwatashi K., Myohara K. A modifier gene involved in the expression of the dominant mating type allele in Paramecium caudatum. Genet Res. 1976 Apr;27(2):135–141. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jennings H S, Opitz P. Genetics of Paramecium Bursaria. IV. a Fourth Variety from Russia. Lethal Crosses with an American Variety. Genetics. 1944 Nov;29(6):576–583. doi: 10.1093/genetics/29.6.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitamura A., Hiwatashi K. Reconstitution of mating active membrane vesicles in Paramecium. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Feb;125(2):486–489. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90143-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyake A. Induction of conjugation by chemical agents in Paramecium. J Exp Zool. 1968 Mar;167(3):359–379. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401670308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tait A. Species identification in protozoa: glucosephosphate isomerase variation in the Paramecium aurelia group. Biochem Genet. 1978 Oct;16(9-10):945–955. doi: 10.1007/BF00483746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]