Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1983 Jul;104(3):497–512. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.3.497

Gene Identity and Genetic Differentiation of Populations in the Finite Island Model

Naoyuki Takahata 1
PMCID: PMC1202091  PMID: 17246145

Abstract

A formula for the variance of gene identity (homozygosity) was derived for the case of neutral mutations using diffusion approximations for the changes of gene frequencies in a subdivided population. It is shown that when gene flow is extremely small, the variance of gene identity for the entire population at equilibrium is smaller than that of the panmictic population with the same mean gene identity. On the other hand, although a large amount of gene flow makes a subdivided population equivalent to a panmictic population, there is an intermediate range of gene flow in which population subdivision can increase the variance. This increase results from the increased variance between colonies. In such a case, each colony has a predominant allele, but the predominant type may differ from colony to colony. The formula for obtaining the variance allows us to study such statistics as the coefficient of gene differentiation and the correlation of heterozygosity. Computer simulations were conducted to study the distribution of gene identity as well as to check the validity of the analytical formulas. Effects of selection were also studied by simulations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (837.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Felsenstein J. Genetic drift in clines which are maintained by migration and natural selection. Genetics. 1975 Sep;81(1):191–207. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.1.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuerst P. A., Chakraborty R., Nei M. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. I. Distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):455–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimura M., Takahata N. Selective constraint in protein polymorphism: study of the effectively neutral mutation model by using an improved pseudosampling method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1048–1052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura M, Weiss G H. The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49(4):561–576. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maruyama T. Analysis of population structure. I. One-dimensional stepping-stone models of finite length. Ann Hum Genet. 1970 Oct;34(2):201–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1970.tb00235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maruyama T., Kimura M. Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6710–6714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nei M., Chakraborty R., Fuerst P. A. Infinite allele model with varying mutation rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):4164–4168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.4164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slatkin M. Testing neutrality in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1982 Mar;100(3):533–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.3.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES