Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1983 Sep;105(1):115–134. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.115

The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xvi. Excess of Additive Genetic Variance of Viability

Terumi Mukai 1, Shuji Nagano 1
PMCID: PMC1202139  PMID: 17246151

Abstract

About 500 second and 500 third chromosomes were extracted, using the marked inversion technique, from the Orlando-Lake Placid, Florida, population. From the experiments using these chromosomes, the following findings were obtained: (1) The frequencies of lethal-carrying chromosomes were 0.37 in the second and 0.55 in the third chromosomes. (2) The size of the population was estimated to be effectively infinite, on the basis of the allelism rate of lethal-carrying chromosomes. (3) The detrimental and lethal loads for viability were, respectively, 0.40 and 0.45 for the second and 0.52 and 0.78 for the third chromosomes. Consequently, the detrimental to lethal load ratio is 0.90 for the second and 0.67 for the third chromosomes. (4) Lethal genes were shown to be deleterious when heterozygous. (5) The average degree of dominance for mildly deleterious genes (viability polygenes) was estimated to be nearly 0.5, although the confidence interval is large. (6) Additive (σ 2A) and dominance (σ2 D) variances of viability were estimated by using a partial diallel cross method. The results were (see PDF) and (see PDF) for the second chromosomes. (7) Environmental variances of viability were estimated. The result indicates that the heterozygotes are more homeostatic than the homozygotes. The most striking finding is that the additive variance is larger than expected on the classical hypothesis from the detrimental load. Several possible explanations for the discrepancy are offered. The most likely cause, we suggest, is genotype-environment interaction (diversifying selection) acting on viability polygenes. Overdominance is inconsistent with the low dominance variance, and frequency-dependent selection also appears unlikely as an explanation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Kusakabe S. The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xv. Nature of Developmental Homeostasis for Viability. Genetics. 1982 Jun;101(2):279–300. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mukai T. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 8. Natural selection on the degree of dominance of viability polygenes. Genetics. 1969 Oct;63(2):467–478. doi: 10.1093/genetics/63.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mukai T., Yamaguchi O. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):339–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mukai T., Yamazaki T. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. Coupling-repulsion effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability. Genetics. 1968 Aug;59(4):513–535. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.4.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muki T., Watanabe T. K., Yamaguchi O. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XII. Linkage disequilibrium in a large local population. Genetics. 1974 Aug;77(4):771–793. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.4.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES