Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1983 Sep;105(1):135–155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.135

Frequency Distribution of Esterase-5 Alleles in Two Populations of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA

Tim Perri Keith 1
PMCID: PMC1202140  PMID: 17246152

Abstract

Statistical tests comparing allele frequencies in natural populations with those predicted by various theories of genic variation depend critically on the accurate enumeration of alleles. This study used a series of five sequential electrophoretic conditions to characterize the allele frequency distributions of esterase-5 in two large population samples of Drosophila pseudoobscura from California. In Standard chromosome lines 12 electromorphs were discriminated using a single electrophoretic condition. When four additional criteria were used, the number of electromorphs increased to 41, 33 in one population and 22 in the other. Both populations had the same two alleles in high frequency, with other alleles present in frequencies of 6% or less. Although each population had a number of unique alleles, a χ2 contingency test demonstrated no significant genetic divergence between them. A statistical comparison of allele frequencies in both populations with that predicted by neutral models suggests that the individual and combined distributions deviate from neutrality in the direction of purifying selection.—Sex-Ratio chromosomes differed markedly from Standard chromosomes in both allelic content and diversity. In 32 Sex-Ratio chromosomes from one population only three alleles were found, all of which were detected under the initial "standard" electrophoretic conditions. Moreover, none of these alleles was found in the Standard chromosome lines.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cochrane B. J., Richmond R. C. Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. I. The genetics of a posttranslational modification. Biochem Genet. 1979 Feb;17(1-2):167–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00484483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coyne J. A. Gel electrophoresis and cryptic protein variation. Isozymes Curr Top Biol Med Res. 1982;6:1–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A. Lack of genic similarity between two sibling species of drosophila as revealed by varied techniques. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):593–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ewens W. J. Population genetics theory in relation to the neutralist-selectionist controversy. Adv Hum Genet. 1977;8:67–134. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8267-0_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuerst P. A., Chakraborty R., Nei M. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. I. Distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):455–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hedrick J. L., Smith A. J. Size and charge isomer separation and estimation of molecular weights of proteins by disc gel electrophoresis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Jul;126(1):155–164. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90569-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hubby J. L., Narise S. Protein differences in Drosophila. 3. Allelic differences and species differences in in vitro hybrid enzyme formation. Genetics. 1967 Oct;57(2):291–300. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. King J. L., Ohta T. Polyallelic mutational equilibria. Genetics. 1975 Apr;79(4):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nei M., Li W. H. Non-random association between electromorphs and inversion chromosomes in finite populations. Genet Res. 1980 Feb;35(1):65–83. doi: 10.1017/s001667230001394x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Powell J. R., Dobzhansky T., Hook J. E., Wistrand H. E. Genetics of natural populations, XLIII. Further studies on rates of dispersal of Drosophila pseudoobscura and its relatives. Genetics. 1976 Mar 25;82(3):493–506. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh R. S. Genic heterogeneity within electrophoretic "alleles" and the pattern of variation among loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1979 Dec;93(4):997–1018. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.4.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Singh R. S., Hubby J. L., Lewontin R. C. Molecular heterosis for heat-sensitive enzyme alleles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1808–1810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh R. S., Hubby J. L., Throckmorton L. H. The study of genic variation by electrophoretic and heat denaturation techniques at the octanol dehydrogenase locus in members of the Drosophila virilis group. Genetics. 1975 Jul;(3):637–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh R. S., Lewontin R. C., Felton A. A. Genetic heterogeneity within electrophoretic "alleles" of xanthine dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):609–629. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strobeck C. Expected linkage disequilibrium for a neutral locus linked to a chromosomal arrangement. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):545–555. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Watterson G. A. Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics. 1977 Apr;85(4):789–814. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.4.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES