Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1983 Sep;105(1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71

Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors

Chung-I Wu 1,2, Andrew T Beckenbach 1,2
PMCID: PMC1202152  PMID: 17246158

Abstract

This study deals with sex-ratio genes tightly linked within the Sex-Ratio inversion. By taking advantage of the fact that the Sex-Ratio chromosome of Drosophila persimilis [SR(B)] is homosequential to the Standard chromosome of D. pseudoobscura [ST(A)], we carried out two reciprocal introgression experiments. Individual segments of SR(B) or ST(A) were introgressed into the genome of D. pseudoobscura or D. persimilis, respectively. Males possessing a hybrid SR(B)-ST(A) X chromosome and a genetic background derived from either of the two species were tested for fertility and sex-ratio expression.—It was found that, in terms of the meiotic drive genes, the Sex-Ratio chromosome differs extensively from the Standard chromosome. Because recombinations of these genes result in a complete loss of sex-ratio expression, this finding lends strong support to the hypothesis of gene coadaptation. Coadaptation, in this context, is the advantage of being transmitted preferentially. In light of this finding, the evolution of the sex-ratio system in these two sibling species is discussed.—Introgression experiments also yielded information about hybrid sterility. With reciprocal introgression, sterility interactions were found to be "asymmetric." The asymmetry is fully expected from the viewpoint of evolution of postmating reproductive isolation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (926.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dobzhansky T., Pavlovsky O. INTERRACIAL HYBRIDIZATION AND BREAKDOWN OF COADAPTED GENE COMPLEXES IN DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM AND DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958 Jun;44(6):622–629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.6.622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EHRMAN L. The genetics of sexual isolation in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics. 1961 Aug;46:1025–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.8.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nei M., Li W. H. Non-random association between electromorphs and inversion chromosomes in finite populations. Genet Res. 1980 Feb;35(1):65–83. doi: 10.1017/s001667230001394x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stalker H D. The Genetic Systems Modifying Meiotic Drive in Drosophila Paramelanica. Genetics. 1961 Feb;46(2):177–202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sturtevant A H, Dobzhansky T. Geographical Distribution and Cytology of "Sex Ratio" in Drosophila Pseudoobscura and Related Species. Genetics. 1936 Jul;21(4):473–490. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.4.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES