Abstract
The modes of selection important in maintaining an inversion-allozyme polymorphism in two laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster were examined. The populations, 731R and J2, are highly resistant to DDT. The polymorphism involves the Standard and In(3R)P chromosomal arrangements in very strong linkage association with the AO 1 and AO4 allozymes, respectively, of the aldehyde oxidase locus—The mean fertilities of the three karyotypes were not significantly different in 731R, but, in J2, In/In was significantly inferior to St/St and St/In. Egg-to-adult viability tests indicated very strong heterozygote advantage at all frequency combinations of the karyotypes in both populations when DDT was present. When DDT was excluded, the viabilities varied over the frequency combinations but were not inversely correlated with karyotype frequency, as predicted by balancing frequency-dependent selection. Discrete, multiple-generation experiments showed a rapid increase in heterozygote frequency to about 80% in both populations when DDT was present. Without DDT, 731R showed apparent directional selection favoring St, whereas J2 showed persistence of the polymorphism, although with extensive fluctuation.—Thus, the inversion-allozyme polymorphism is directly involved in the adaptation to a specific environmental component, DDT, and the selective advantage of the heterozygotes is the important balancing force. Balancing frequency-dependent selection was not observed, which suggests the hypothesis that this form of selection may not be involved in adaptation to novel environmental conditions.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson W. W., Oshima C., Watanabe T., Dobzhansky T., Pavlovsky O. Genetics of natural populations. XXXIX. A test of the possible influence of two insecticides on the chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1968 Mar;58(3):423–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/58.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark A. The Effects of Interspecific Competition on the Dynamics of a Polymorphism in an Experimental Population of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1315–1328. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cory L., Fjeld P., Serat W. Environmental DDT and the genetics of natural populations. Nature. 1971 Jan 8;229(5280):128–130. doi: 10.1038/229128a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davenport R. J., Johnson D. C. Determination of nitrate and nitrite by forced-flow liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Anal Chem. 1974 Nov;46(13):1971–1978. doi: 10.1021/ac60349a044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S. L., Singh M., Kojima K. A Study of Frequency-Dependent Selection Observed in the Esterase-6 Locus of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Using a Conditioned Media Method. Genetics. 1971 May;68(1):97–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/68.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laurie-Ahlberg C. C., Weir B. S. Allozymic Variation and Linkage Disequilibrium in Some Laboratory Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1295–1314. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merrell D J. Heterosis in Ddt Resistant and Susceptible Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1960 May;45(5):573–581. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.5.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]