Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1983 Oct;105(2):461–468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.461

Role of Biased Gene Conversion in One-Locus Neutral Theory and Genome Evolution

James Bruce Walsh 1
PMCID: PMC1202168  PMID: 17246166

Abstract

The implications of biased gene conversion acting on selectively neutral alleles are investigated for a single diallelic locus in a finite population. Even a very slight conversion bias can significantly alter fixation probabilities. We argue that most newly arising mutants will be at a conversion disadvantage, resulting in a potentially greatly decreased substitution rate of new alleles compared with predictions from strict neutral theory. Thus, conversion bias potential allows for conservation of particular alleles without having to invoke selection. Conversely, we also show that bias can be important in the maintenance of repeated gene families without altering the substitution rate at other loci that experience the same amount of conversion bias, provided that the number of genes in the family is sufficiently large. Bias can, therefore, be important at the genomic level and yet be unimportant at the populational level. Finally, we discuss the role of biased gene conversion in speciation events, concluding that this type of molecular turnover acting independently at many individual loci is very unlikely to decrease the time required for two allopatric populations to speciate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (567.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dover G. Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature. 1982 Sep 9;299(5879):111–117. doi: 10.1038/299111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gutz H., Leslie J. F. Gene conversion: a hitherto overlooked parameter in population genetics. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):861–866. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.4.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hilliker A. J., Chovnick A. Further observations on intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1981 Dec;38(3):281–296. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300020619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohta T., Kimura M. Some calculations on the amount of selfish DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1129–1132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES