Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1984 Jan;106(1):123–137. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.1.123

An Analysis of Heterosis VS. Inbreeding Effects with an Autotetraploid Cross-Fertilized Plant: MEDICAGO SATIVA L

A Gallais 1
PMCID: PMC1202241  PMID: 17246187

Abstract

Self-fertilization and crossing were combined to produce a large number of levels of inbreeding and of degrees of kinship. The inbreeding effect increases with the complexity of the character and with its supposed relationship with fitness. A certain amount of heterozygosity appears to be necessary for the expression of variability. With crossing of unrelated noninbred plants, genetic variance is mainly additive, but with inbreeding its major part is nonadditive. High additivity in crossing, therefore, coexists with strong inbreeding depression. However, even in inbreeding the genetic coefficient of covariation among relatives appears to be strongly and linearly related to the classical coefficient of kinship. This means that deviations from the additive model with inbreeding could be partly due to an effect of inbreeding on variances through an effect on means. An attempt to analyze genetic effects from a theoretical model, based upon the identity by descent relationship at the level of means and of covariances between relatives, tends to show that allelic interactions are more important and nonallelic interactions are less important for a character closely related to fitness. For a complex character, these results lead to the conception of a genome organized in polygenic complementary blocks integrating epistasis and dominance. Some consequences for plant breeding are also discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (897.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chi R. K., Eberhart S. A., Penny L. H. Covariances among Relatives in a Maize Variety (ZEA MAYS L.). Genetics. 1969 Oct;63(2):511–520. doi: 10.1093/genetics/63.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LEWONTIN R. C. THE INTERACTION OF SELECTION AND LINKAGE. II. OPTIMUM MODELS. Genetics. 1964 Oct;50:757–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.4.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mukai T., Yoshikawa I., Sano K. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Heterozygous effects of radiation-induced mutations on viability in various genetic backgrounds. Genetics. 1966 Mar;53(3):513–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.3.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES