Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1984 Jan;106(1):139–152. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.1.139

The Effective Proportion of Self-Fertilization with Consanguineous Matings in Inbred Populations

Kermit Ritland 1
PMCID: PMC1202242  PMID: 17246188

Abstract

Allelic segregation at a single locus among offspring derived from matings, including those between inbred relatives, is a combination of two patterns, corresponding to self-fertilization and random outcrossing. The proportion of effective self-fertilization is termed the "effective selfing rate," and it is specified with identity coefficients. The description of the offspring genotypic distribution for a population with mating among relatives requires a set of three independent parameters of genetic and mating structure. One such set is the inbreeding coefficient of parents, the coefficient of kinship between mates and the effective selfing rate. The model used to derive the effective selfing rate distinguishes between the effective selfing rates of inbred vs. outbred parents; the mixed mating model does not distinguish between these two rates. As a result, the mixed mating model usually gives biased estimates of effective selfing, if there is mating among inbred relatives. The procedure for estimation of effective selfing, based upon progeny array data distributed according to the "effective selfing model," is presented, and an example is given.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (802.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HARRIS D. L. GENOTYPIC COVARIANCES BETWEEN INBRED RELATIVES. Genetics. 1964 Dec;50:1319–1348. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.6.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jacquard A. Inbreeding: one word, several meanings. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Jun;7(3):338–363. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Salmon D. B., Brocteur J. Probability of paternity exclusion when relatives are involved. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;30(1):65–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shaw D. V., Kahler A. L., Allard R. W. A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1298–1302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thompson E. A. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Oct;39(2):173–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES