Abstract
The intestine, as a critical interface between the external environment and the internal body, plays a central role in nutrient absorption, immune regulation, and maintaining homeostasis. The intestinal epithelium, composed of specialized epithelial cells, hosts apical anion transporters that primarily mediate the transport of chloride and bicarbonate ions, essential for maintaining electrolyte balance, pH homeostasis, and fluid absorption/secretion. Additionally, the intestine hosts a diverse population of gut microbiota that plays a pivotal role in various physiological processes including nutrient metabolism, immune regulation and maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity, all of which are critical for host gut homeostasis and health. The anion transporters and gut microbiome are intricately interconnected, where alterations in one can trigger changes in the other leading to compromised barrier integrity and increasing susceptibility to pathophysiological states including gut inflammation. This review focuses on the interplay of key apical anion transporters including Down Regulated in Adenoma (DRA, SLC26A3), Putative Anion Transporter-1 (PAT1, SLC26A6) and Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR, ABCC7) with the gut microbiome, barrier integrity and their relationship to gut inflammation.
Keywords: DRA, PAT1, CFTR, Intestinal transporter, IBD, Ion channel
1. Enterocyte apical membrane anion transporters and their implications in pathophysiological states.
The intestinal epithelium plays a critical role in absorption including the uptake of sugars, peptides, electrolytes and water (1). Absorption primarily occurs in the villi, where cells specialize in solute uptake, while secretion is predominant in the crypts. The absorption of solutes and water relies on specialized transporters embedded in the cell membranes, which facilitate the movement of nutrients and ions across the epithelial barrier. Following solute transport, water moves passively through both paracellular (between cells) and transcellular (through cells) pathways to maintain osmotic balance. These transporters are differentially expressed along the length of the intestinal tract, allowing for region-specific uptake or secretion of various substrates. Under physiological conditions, this distribution of transporters enables a finely tuned balance between absorption and secretion, ensuring optimal nutrient assimilation and hydration of the body. These ion transporters embedded in the cell membranes are also essential for maintaining acid-base balance in the body. These membrane proteins allow specific ions to move in and out of the cells, influencing the pH of both the intracellular and extracellular environments. By controlling the movement of ions such as hydrogen (H+), bicarbonate (HCO3−), chloride (Cl−), and sodium (Na+), these transporters help to regulate acid and base concentrations, which is crucial for the optimal function of cellular processes. In this review, we focus exclusively on anion transporters (Figure 1) primarily involved in intestinal Cl− and HCO3− transport and are directly implicated in alterations of the gut microbiome and their loss/dysregulation has been linked to increase in susceptibility to the development of intestinal inflammation.
Figure 1:

A) Differential expression pattern of anion transporters along the gastrointestinal tract in mice. H, M and L show high, moderate, and low expressions of CFTR, PAT1 and DRA in different segments of the mouse intestine. B) The transepithelial movement of solutes and ions in intestinal epithelial cells is mediated by transporters and channels. Under normal conditions, apical anion transporters such as DRA (Down-Regulated in Adenoma) and PAT1 facilitate Cl− and HCO3− exchange, while Cl− and HCO3−secretion across the membrane is mediated by the apical Cl− channel CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator). On the basolateral side, NKCC1 (Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter) supports Cl− uptake from the serosal side and K+ is taken up by NKCC1 and Na+/K+-ATPase is recycled via basolateral K+ channels. Carbonic anhydrase (CAII) plays a key role in converting carbon dioxide and water into HCO3− and H+ ions. In normal physiological condition, the mucus layer serves as a protective barrier, preventing direct contact between gut microbes and the epithelium. Intestinal epithelial cells are sealed by tight junctions (TJs, including claudins, occludin, and ZO-1) and adherens junctions (AJs, such as E-cadherin), which regulate paracellular flux. However, in pathophysiological states, dysregulation of transporters such as DRA, PAT1, and CFTR leads to gut microbial dysbiosis, mucus and epithelial barrier dysfunction, and decreased expression of TJ/AJ proteins, contributing to higher susceptibility to gut inflammation and diarrhea. Created with BioRender.com.
1.1. DRA (Down Regulated in Adenoma, SLC26A3):
DRA, a member of the SLC26 family, is the key intestinal Cl−/HCO3− exchanger that was originally documented as a gene down-regulated in colon adenomas. DRA is primarily localized to the apical membranes of distal intestinal epithelial cells (and not expressed in cells of lamina propria including immune cells) with the highest expression in the cecum and colon (2) (Figure 1A). Similarly, in humans DRA expression is highest in the colon and the lowest in small intestinal regions (https://www.jrturnerlab.com/atlasofintestinaltransport), (3). DRA is now known to play a critical role in intestinal Cl− absorption and mutations in the DRA gene underlie the clinical presentation of the congenital chloride-losing diarrhea (CLD) in the humans. Multiple recent genome wide association studies have now established SLC26A3 polymorphism, associated with lower DRA expression, as a risk factor for the development of ulcerative colitis (UC) (4`), (5), (6), (7). In fact, a very recent study has shown that patients with CLD exhibit much higher incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) (8). Similar to CLD patients, DRA-knockout (KO) mice exhibit a phenotype similar to CLD disorder. These mice suffer from persistent diarrhea characterized by elevated Cl− levels, severe fluid loss, volume depletion, metabolic alkalosis, conjoint crypt architecture (crypt orifices merged) impaired growth and need to be maintained on electrolytes for their survival (9`), (10), (11), (7). Additionally, DRA-KO mice develop an acidic microenvironment in the colonic lumen due to defective HCO3− secretion (9). Furthermore, numerous studies from our group and others have also demonstrated that DRA function and/or expression is also downregulated in infectious diarrheal diseases caused by pathogens such as Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (12), Salmonella typhimurium (13), Citrobacter rodentium (14), (15), Cryptosporidium parvum (16) and Clostridioides difficile (17`), (18), (19). Extensive studies by our group and others have also shown that DRA expression is significantly downregulated in various mouse models of IBD, including those induced by Dextran Sodium Sulphate (DSS) (20`), (21), 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNBS) (22), adoptive T-cell transfer (23) anti-CD40 (24), TNFα (25) and IL-10 KO colitis (26). Further, recent studies have shown that DRA-KO mice exhibited gut microbial dysbiosis, thinner inner mucus layer, high susceptibility to DSS colitis and increased antimicrobial peptide expression such as IL22, Reg3β/γ and Relmβ from juvenile age (27`), (28), (29), (30). We have also shown that loss of DRA resulted in increased colonic permeability and immune cell dysregulation (increased Th2, Th17, Tregs and ILC2s) via altered epithelial-immune cell crosstalk offering new perspectives on the emerging role of this anion transporter in maintaining gut homeostasis (27`), (31).
1.2. PAT1 (Putative Anion Transporter 1, SLC26A6):
PAT1 is also a member of the SLC26 family of anion transporters that plays a critical role in maintaining oxalate homeostasis and luminal pH balance in intestine (32). PAT1 primarily facilitates the exchange of Cl−, HCO3−, and oxalate ions across cell membranes, particularly in the intestine, kidney, and pancreas (32). The expression profile of PAT1 in the mouse intestine exhibits a distinct regional pattern that is notably opposite to the expression pattern of DRA. Specifically, PAT1 is more highly expressed in the upper small intestine of mouse with relatively little or no expression in the colon (33) (Figure 1A). However, in the human intestine PAT1 expression is 1.8 fold higher in the colon compared to small intestine (34). Previous studies have shown that PAT1 expression was significantly reduced in the presence of IFNγ (an inflammatory cytokine) and adenosine (a nucleoside) that are known to be elevated in IBD (35`), (36). The association between reduced PAT1 expression and IBD is further supported by other studies. For instance, transcriptomic analyses of ileal mucosa from patients with Crohn’s disease have demonstrated significantly lower PAT1 expression levels compared to healthy controls (37). Unlike DRA-KO mice, PAT1-KO mice do not exhibit diarrheal phenotype (38`), (9). However, PAT1 appears to be more important in facilitating the secretion of oxalate in the intestine and kidney that contributes to the regulation of oxalate levels in the body, thereby mitigating the risk of kidney stone formation and supports renal health (39`), (40), (41). PAT1-KO mice develop hyperoxalemia, hyperoxaluria and kidney stones (40). A recent study from our group has shown that loss of PAT1 was also associated with altered gut microbiota, thinner mucous layer, altered tight junction (TJ) integrity and increased susceptibility to gut inflammation (39).
1.3. CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, ABCC7):
The CFTR gene was discovered as the genetic cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), a serious and often fatal hereditary disease. The CFTR gene encodes a protein that belongs to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. It is activated by cAMP and ATP and functions as an anion channel responsible for secreting both Cl− and HCO3− ions into the intestinal lumen (42`), (43). The movement of ions increases osmotic pressure for the passage of water in the same direction. Thus, CFTR also maintains water homeostasis (44`), (45). Additionally, CFTR modulates other ion channels, such as inhibiting SCNN1, a sodium channel, to enhance water secretion (3). It also contributes to epithelial TJ integrity, pH regulation, and extracellular transport of sphingosine-1-phosphate, a key mediator of inflammation and cell adhesion (46). CFTR is expressed throughout the intestinal tract, with decreasing levels from the duodenum to the ileum and colon. In both the small and large intestine, its expression is highest at the crypt base, where intestinal stem cells reside, though some expression is also found on villus cells. In the colon, CFTR levels are highest in the cecum and proximal colon, tapering towards the distal colon (47`), (48) (Figure 1A). The CFTR expression pattern in the human intestine closely parallels that observed in the mouse intestine (49). Mutations in the CFTR gene that impair its protein function lead to significant disruption in anion transport, particularly affecting the regulation of fluid and/or mucus secretion (50). In organs such as the intestines, lungs and pancreas the loss/dysregulation of CFTR results in thickened, sticky mucus that cannot be cleared effectively (50). In individuals with CF, this thickened and sticky mucus builds up primarily in the lungs and digestive system, leading to chronic lung infection and slow deterioration in its function, meconium ileus, pancreatic insufficiency and male infertility (51`), (52). Dysregulation of CFTR expression and/or activity also plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of secretory diarrhea. In diarrheal diseases such as cholera (cholera toxin produced by Vibrio cholerae) and traveler’s diarrhea (heat-stable enterotoxin produced by Escherichia coli) trigger a cascade of events that lead to the increased CFTR activity (53`), (54). These toxins stimulate adenylate cyclase activity, resulting in elevated intracellular cAMP levels. This, in turn, activates CFTR, causing excessive Cl− and water secretion into the intestinal lumen, ultimately leading to severe diarrhea and dehydration.
CFTR has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD, particularly UC. Studies have demonstrated a significant downregulation of CFTR gene and protein expression in patients with active UC. Notably, this reduced expression persists even in patients with UC in remission, indicating a potential role for CFTR dysfunction in both the initiation and progression of colonic inflammation (55). In addition, clinical evidence indicates that individuals with CF have up to a 17-fold increased risk of developing IBD compared to the general population (56); (57). CF patients have heightened intestinal inflammation, evidenced by increased pro-inflammatory gene expression, specific fecal markers (fecal calprotectin), visible lesions (capsule endoscopy), histological abnormalities in surgical specimens and exaggerated activation of NF-κB (58); (57); (59). However, some controversial reports suggest that loss-of-function variants in the CFTR gene may confer a protective effect against IBD (60); (61). For example, recently, Yu et al., by using one of the largest scale IBD exome sequencing dataset, demonstrated that CF-risk variants in the CFTR gene provide a protective effect against IBD at both single-variant and gene-based levels (60). Also, by using DNA heteroduplex analysis in three independent cohorts of Italian, Swedish, and Scottish IBD patients and controls, Bresso et al. have shown that mutations in CFTR gene might exert a protective effect in Crohn’s disease (61). Therefore, further research is necessary to explore the potential implications of CFTR functional mutations and/or expression in IBD pathogenesis. In another study, Walker et al. highlighted the interplay of anion transporter manipulation for therapeutic exploitation, as significant improvement was shown in the survival rate of CF mice when treated with talniflumate for reducing NaCl absorption via the inhibition of Cl−/HCO3− exchangers (62). In addition, CFTR-KO mice have been shown to exhibit increased susceptibility to biliary damage and portal inflammation when exposed to acute DSS-induced colitis and portal endotoxemia (63). In addition, loss of CFTR also resulted in microbial dysbiosis, which were consistent between intestinal epithelial cell specific CFTR knockdown in mice and models with immune cell specific (including neutrophils, macrophages, and monocytes) CFTR knockdown, (64). These findings suggest that the disrupted microbiota associated with CFTR deficiency are not solely dependent on epithelial CFTR expression but may also involve immune cell-mediated mechanisms. These insights emphasize the complex interplay between immune cell function and microbial communities in CFTR-related pathologies.
2. Gut microbiome composition, function and relationship with anion transporters:
In both humans and mice, the gut microbiota is predominantly composed of two major phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (65`), (66), (67), (68), (69). Both have similar bacterial communities at higher taxonomic levels (such as phyla, class, and order), however they also diverge at lower taxonomic levels (genera, species, and subspecies) (70`), (71), (72), (73), (74). Analysis of 16S rDNA data from multiple studies showed that both humans and mice harbor 79 shared genera (75). Common genera between human and mice at relatively similar abundance include Clostridium (Firmicutes), Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes), and Blautia (Firmicutes). The microbiota of both humans and mice share significant metagenomic functional similarities, with almost 80% of annotated functions being common between the two (71`), (72), (76), (77), (78), (79). Additionally, 25 core genera are shared between mouse and human gut microbiomes, indicating a substantial functional overlap in their microbiome activities (78). Due to these numerous similarities between mouse and human microbiome, mouse models are extensilvely utilized to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying human diseases.
The functional aspect of gut microbiota is very wide as it plays crucial roles in health through various mechanisms. Microbiota aids in digestion by fermenting non-digestible food components, such as dietary fiber and intestinal mucus, producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that support gut function (80). Through the production of SCFAs, the microbiota also has anti-inflammatory effects, which may help prevent inflammatory diseases (81`), (82). It also contributes to immunity and regulates metabolism, influencing glucose and nutrient processing and potentially impacting conditions like obesity (83`), (84), (85), (81`), (86).
The gut microbiome can be influenced by various aspects of host physiology, for example, diet (87`), (88), (89), (90) antibiotic use (91`), (92), (93), mucus composition (94`), (95), bile acid composition (96`), (97), (98) , (99) and oxygen levels (100`), (101), (102), (103). However, one of the most important factor that is regulated by anion transporters is the luminal pH that also is known to affect gut microbiome. Seekatz et al. (104) have shown that a strong correlation exists between gut microbiome and pH. Fifteen microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are known to be significantly correlated with pH changes. Six OTUs classified as Bacteroidetes, mainly Prevotella, and two OTUs classified as Pasteurellaceae (Proteobacteria) were negatively correlated with pH (with decreased abundance at higher pHs). The other OTUs, classified as Firmicutes, mainly Streptococcus, as well as Actinomyces (Actinobacteria), were positively correlated with pH (higher abundance at higher pHs) (104). A study by Ilhan et al. (105), conducted under in vitro conditions, also showed that microbiome was influenced by both pH and substrate type, however the impact of substrate type was secondary and became evident only when alkalinity was insufficient. The balance between HCO3− alkalinity and fatty acid formation during fermentation determined the pH, which in turn shaped the microbiome structure. Additionally, the production of fermentation products, such as SCFAs, was highly pH-dependent. Lactate accumulation was prominent at lower pH, dominated by lactate producing Streptococcus, while propionate and acetate producing microbiota (Veillonella, Bacteroides, and Escherichia) dominated at higher pH, regardless of the substrate type. This shows that pH plays a critical role in influencing the structure and function of microbial communities in the gut.
The primary transporters involved in luminal pH regulation include CFTR and various members of the SLC26 family, such as SLC26A3 and SLC26A6. In addition to these, other transporters, such as the sodium/hydrogen exchangers, also contribute to pH regulation (106). Engevik et al. (107) have also shown the role of NHE3 in maintaining pH and ion balance that shapes the gut microbiota. NHE3-KO mice exhibited an altered intestinal microenvironment with increased luminal Na+ and alkaline pH that resulted in region-specific alterations in the gut microbiota, with a general decrease in Firmicutes and an increase in Bacteroidetes, particularly Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in the terminal ileum. They further showed that B. thetaiotaomicron growth in tryptone soy broth was proportional to the ileal luminal Na(+) concentration. In addition, other studies have also shown that NHE3-KO mice exhibit reduced genera of Firmicutes and increased Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria (108); (109). Also, the FMT from NHE3-KO mice was shown to accelerate the onset and severity of experimental colitis in IL10-KO mice (110). These studies highlight that the interplay between these transporters is crucial in maintaining an intestinal luminal environment conducive to healthy microbial growth. Our current review mainly focuses on DRA, PAT1 and CFTR, the key apical anion transporters which are critical for luminal pH homeostasis and have been the most studied with respect to their implications in dysbiosis and gut inflammation.
3. The role of downregulation of anion transporters in microbial dysbiosis and increased susceptibility to gut inflammation
3.1. The Key Takeaways from DRA-KO Mice:
a). Microbial Dysbiosis:
The gut microbiome plays a vital role in maintaining mucus and epithelial barrier integrity and immune cell homeostasis. Interestingly, DRA-KO mice demonstrated gut microbial dysbiosis (27) (28), as evidenced by significant a and b diversity changes with the reduction in the major phylum Actinobacteria. Furthermore, DRA-KO mice also exhibited decreased Bacteroidales family S24-7 and Rikenellaceae levels while showing significantly increased Bacteroidaceae and Porphyromonadaceae levels in fecal and cecal samples. In addition, DRA-KO mice showed a substantial reduction in numerous butyrate-producing Clostridia bacteria, including Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum, Coprococcus, Ruminococcus, Clostridium, Anaerostipes, and Oscillospira (Table 1) (27). These data suggest a profound impact on microbial composition and potential functional deficits in SCFAs production, which may contribute to altered gut homeostasis in DRA-KO mice.
Table 1:
Effect of knockout of anion transporters and channels on barrier integrity and gut microbiota.
| Gene | Barrier integrity |
Affected TJ/AJ protein/ transcripts |
Affected microbiota | Gut inflammation/ cytokines and other factors |
References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRA KO |
|
|
Clau2(dc,p) |
|
Parabacteroides
Bacteroides ovatus Allobaculum |
|
CXCL1(dc,m) IL-1β(dc,m) TNF-α(dc,m) FITC- Dextran(pc,dc) AMPs(c,m) |
(27), (28), 28, (30), (25) |
|
|
Occludin (dc,p) ZO-1(dc,p) E-Cadherin (dc,p) β-catenin (dc,p) |
|
Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum Coprococcus Ruminococcus Odoribacter Clostridium Anaerostipes Oscillospira |
|
Mucus Layer Thickness | |||
| PAT1 KO |
|
|
Clau2(i,p) E-cadherin(dc,p) |
|
Bacteroides acidifaciens
Streptococcus |
|
FITC -Dextran(pl) | (39) |
|
|
Occludin(i,dc,m,p) ZO-1(i,dc,m,p) Clau7(dc,m) |
|
Lactobacillus
Prevotella Oscillospira Ruminococcus |
|
Goblet cells(dc) Muc2(c,p) |
|||
| CFTR KO |
|
|
Clau2(si,m) Clau2(i,p) |
|
Clostridium perfringens Clostridium innocuum Clostridium difficile Ruminococcus gnavus Bacteroides acidifaciens Streptococcus Enterococcus Escherichia Shigella |
|
CCL1-3(int,m) CCL22(int,m) CXCL9-11(int,m) CX3CL1(int,m) IFN-γ(int,m) IL-4(int,m) IL-13(int,m) CCL20(int,m) IL-22(int,m) IL1β(int,m) fecal calprotectin eosinophil infiltration(j) FITC- Dextran(pl) lipocalin-2(int,m) |
(114), (115), (117), (116), (123), (121) |
|
|
Clau8(si,m) Claul(si,m) Clau7(si,m) Pmp22(si,m) |
|
Akkermansia Lachnoclostridium Parabacteroides Odoribacter Allobaculum |
|
IL-10 (i,m) | |||
(DRA) Down regulated in Adenoma; (PAT1) Putative anion transporter-1; (CFTR) Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator; (KO) Knockout; (TJ) Tight Junction; (AJ) Adherens Junction; (FITC) Fluorescein Isothiocyanate; (AMP) Antimicrobial peptide; (ZO) Zonula Occludens; (HNF) Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor; (TNF) Tumor Necrosis Factor; (IFN) Interferon; (IL) Interleukin; (CXCL) CXC chemokine ligand; (CCL) CC chemokine ligand; (Clau) Claudin; (NF-κB) Nuclear factor-kappa B; (IκBα) nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor alpha; (MAPK) (ERK1/2 MAPK) Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase; (j) jejunum; (i) ileum; (int) intestine (intestinal mucosa); (si) small intestine; (c) colon; (pc) proximal colon; (dc) distal colon; (s) serum; (m) mRNA; (p) protein; (pl) plasma; (Pmp22) peripheral myelin protein 22.
Upregulated gene/protein expression/function;
Downregulation gene/protein expression/function.
b). Compromised Barrier integrity and Increased Susceptibility to Gut Inflammation
The mucus and epithelial cell layers are essential for maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier. The mucus layer acts as a protective shield, preventing harmful bacteria from adhering to the epithelial lining. Meanwhile, the epithelial cell layer forms a physical barrier that blocks the entry of bacteria and toxins from the intestine into the body, thereby safeguarding against excessive immune responses and inflammation (111). Our study also showed that DRA KO mice exhibited increased paracellular permeability, accompanied by a reduced expression of TJ proteins (Occludin and ZO-1) and adherens junction (AJ) (E-cadherin) protein compared to wild-type (WT) mice (27). Furthermore, an elevated expression of the pore-forming protein claudin-2 was also observed in the colon of DRA KO mice, further reinforcing the fact that alterations in TJ/AJ dynamics were responsible for the increased permeability. A study by Xiao et al. showed that DRA-KO mice displayed a defect in the colonic mucus layer with increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis (29) These studies indicate that the loss of DRA not only leads to microbial dysbiosis but also impacts the barrier integrity which may contribute to increased susceptibility to gut inflammation. The DRA KO mice also showed a moderate increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including, CXCL1, IL-1β, and TNF, while no significant changes were detected in IFN-γ levels (27), (28). Our studies further showed that DRA KO mice. exhibited an upregulation in RNA binding protein expression, CUGBP1, a negative regulator of TJ/AJ protein. Concurrently, there was a reduction in intact HuR levels, a positive regulator of TJ/AJ proteins, along with an increase in its cleaved product, HuR-CP1. This decrease in intact HuR is known to reduce HuR’s binding affinity to the 3’ UTRs of occludin and E-cadherin mRNA, potentially contributing to the dysregulation of observed TJ/AJ proteins (112) (113).
Our group also performed co-housing studies with DRA KO and WT mice to evaluate the precise role of DRA deficiency-associated dysbiosis on TJ/AJ and RNA binding protein expression (27). Cohousing studies showed that 4 weeks of co-housing of DRA KO mice with WT mice resulted in a significant exchange of bacteria between DRA KO and WT mice and partially blocked the loss of DRA-associated decrease in E-cadherin and RNA binding protein HuR expression along with a lower increase in CUGBP-1-expression, indicating that dysbiosis was partly responsible for the loss of DRA-associated compromised barrier function (27). These studies underscore the broader impact of DRA deficiency on gut physiology, linking impaired anion transport with disruptions in microbial communities and intestinal health, which have implications in increasing susceptibility to gut inflammation.
3.2. The Key Takeaways from PAT1-KO Mice:
a). Microbial Dysbiosis:
A very recent study from our group (39) has yielded significant insights into the microbial dysbiosis observed in PAT1-KO mice. The PAT1-KO mice showed no difference in alpha diversity, however beta diversity displayed distinct bacterial community structure. PAT1-KO mice exhibited a significant reduction in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and an enrichment of Bacteroidetes. This dysbiotic alteration was further reflected by the elevated presence of specific members of the Bacteroidales order, such as the family S24-7 and Bacteroides acidifaciens, both of which were significantly more abundant in PAT1-KO mice compared to their WT counterparts. A particularly interesting observation was the enrichment of the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus in the fecal microbiota of PAT1-KO mice, which is known to exacerbate intestinal inflammation and predispose the host to pathogenic infections (39). In WT mice, Lactobacillus—a genus within the Lactobacillaceae family known for its bifidogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antigenotoxic properties—was the dominant taxon, comprising 37.7% of the total microbial community on average. However, the loss of PAT1 resulted in a significant reduction in Lactobacillus levels to 17.2%, suggesting that optimal levels of PAT1 play a crucial role in maintaining beneficial gut microbes. Moreover, members of the butyrate-producing Ruminococcaceae family, including the genera Prevotella, Oscillospira, and Ruminococcus, were markedly depleted in PAT1-KO mice (39). Since these taxa are known to produce SCFAs like butyrate, which support epithelial integrity and exhibit anti-inflammatory effects, their reduction in PAT1-KO mice may have further compromised the gut barrier function and promoted the pro-inflammatory conditions.
b). Compromised Barrier Integrity and Increased Susceptibility to Gut Inflammation:
The same study (39) also measured the levels of primary regulators of paracellular permeability i.e. TJ proteins, and cell to cell adhesion molecules i.e. E-cadherin and β-catenin. A significant reduction in the mRNA transcript levels of occludin and ZO-1 within both the ileum and the distal colon of PAT1-KO mice compared to WT controls was observed. Protein levels of both occludin and ZO-1 were also decreased in distal colon, however in ileum only occludin exhibited a noticeable decline suggesting that tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms might have influenced the TJ protein expression along the intestinal tract. Furthermore, E-cadherin was found to be significantly upregulated in the distal colon of PAT1-KO mice relative to WT controls. However, β-catenin, another key AJ component, displayed no significant alterations in expression, indicating a selective modulation of AJ proteins in response to the loss of PAT1 function. Among the claudins analyzed, claudin-7 exhibited a significant reduction in transcript levels specifically in the distal colon, with no changes observed in the ileum of PAT1-KO mice compared to WT. Notably, the pore-forming claudin-2 protein, which increases paracellular permeability, was found to be significantly upregulated in the ileum of PAT1-KO mice, but its expression remained unchanged in the distal colon. This differential regulation of claudin-2 between intestinal segments may reflect region-specific responses to the disruption of epithelial transport mechanisms caused by PAT1 deficiency. Cohousing of WT mice with PAT1-KO mice showed that microbiota played a predominant role in compromised barrier integrity observed in PAT1 deficient mice (37). Cohoused WT mice showed gut microbial signatures of PAT1-KO mice (for example, higher abundance of Anaerofustis and reduced Prevotella). More importantly, similar to PAT1-KO mice, cohoused WT mice exhibited significant decline in apical ZO-1 levels in ileum and colon (37). These studies further established an important role of dysbiosis associated with PAT1 deficiency in regulating gut barrier integrity.
Further, our group also examined the effects of PAT1 deficiency on Muc2 expression, a key component of the intestinal mucus layer essential for mucosal barrier integrity. In PAT1-KO mice, Muc2 transcript levels remained unchanged; however, we observed a significant reduction in Muc2 protein levels in the colonic mucosa. This suggests a potential dysfunction in mucin production or secretion. Additionally, the number of mucus-producing goblet cells in the distal colon was significantly lower in PAT1-KO mice compared to WT mice, indicating impaired mucus production. This decrease in goblet cells and Muc2 protein likely worsened epithelial barrier function emphasizing the essential role of PAT-1 in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and regulating mucus-producing cells. Loss of the PAT1 protein disrupted the gut microbiome, weakened the gut barrier, and increased the susceptibility to gut inflammation, as was evident by a greater weight loss and more significant colon shortening observed in PAT1-deficient mice exposed to DSS compared to their WT counterparts (39). Furthermore, the PAT1-KO + DSS mice exhibited higher histopathological scores, lower goblet cell numbers and significantly higher transcript levels of IL-1β, Cxcl2, and CCL3 in the distal colon compared to WT + DSS group. Similarly, oxazolone-induced colitis was also found to be more severe in PAT1-KO mice compared to the WT mice. Collectively, lack of PAT1 showed higher susceptibility to both the DSS and oxazolone colitis (Table 1).
3.3. The Key Takeaways from CFTR-KO Mice:
a). Microbial Dysbiosis:
CFTR deficiency has also been shown to markedly disrupt the gut microbiota, leading to significant microbial dysbiosis characterized by shifts in diversity. In CFTR-KO models, beta diversity was notably altered, indicating substantial changes in the overall microbial community structure, while alpha diversity, a measure of species richness within a sample, was often reduced or remained unchanged depending on the study reviewed (114`), (115). As shown in Table 1, dysbiosis in CFTR-KO models was marked by an enrichment of potentially pathogenic bacterial families, particularly Proteobacteria, such as Enterobacteriaceae, and Firmicutes families, including Clostridiaceae and Peptostreptococcaceae (114). Specific species within these families, such as Clostridium perfringens, C. innocuum, and C. difficile, were elevated in CFTR-KO mice, all of which are associated with toxin production, infections, and colitis. Additionally, mucolytic bacteria like Ruminococcus gnavus were enriched in CF mice, that degrades the protective mucus layer of the gut (114).
Conversely, beneficial microbes were significantly depleted in CFTR-KO models. Notably, the abundance of Akkermansia, a mucin-degrading bacterium with anti-inflammatory properties, was reduced (114). Similarly, other commensal genera, including Lachnoclostridium and Parabacteroides, which contribute to gut health and immune regulation, were also decreased (116). Studies in CFTR-KO ferrets further corroborated these findings, revealing elevated levels of pathogenic genera such as Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Escherichia (117). Additional studies highlighted a pronounced enrichment of Enterobacteriales from the class Gammaproteobacteria and species like Bacteroides acidifaciens, known for their role in gut immunity and metabolism, alongside a depletion of taxa such as Muribaculaceae (B. S24_7 group), Odoribacter, and Allobaculum, which are critical for carbohydrate metabolism and maintaining gut integrity (115) (Table 1).
In some CFTR-KO studies, a striking 250-fold increase in the Escherichia/Shigella population was observed, despite its low absolute abundance, further emphasizing the dysbiotic shift (116). This microbial imbalance was accompanied by a depletion of beneficial genera, which is known to impair microbial diversity and compromise gut function. In addition CF mice also showed compromised intestinal barrier integrity associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, increasing susceptibility to gut-related diseases. The dysbiotic state was exacerbated by an increase in inflammatory bacteria and a reduction in protective commensals, creating an environment that favors inflammation and intestinal dysfunction. Importantly, it has also been shown that microbiota composition alterations were consistent between intestinal epithelial cell-specific CFTR-KO mice and models with CFTR-KO restricted to immune cells (64).
The findings in CFTR-KO models align with patterns observed in pediatric CF patients, suggesting a conserved dysbiotic signature associated with CFTR deficiency (118`), (119) , (120). One of the recent study has also shown that in pediatric CF patients, fat malabsorption also played a role, at least in part, in increasing the abundance of proinflammatory gastrointestinal microbiota (119). This highlights the pivotal role of CFTR in maintaining a stable and diverse gut microbiota.
b). Compromised Barrier integrity and Increased Susceptibility to Gut Inflammation:
CFTR plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity and its dysfunction can significantly impact barrier function, leading to increased permeability and susceptibility to gut inflammation. CFTR-KO mice showed a significant increase in claudin-2 mRNA levels and a significant decrease in Claudin-1, Claudin-7, claudin-8 and peripheral myelin protein 22 (Pmp22) mRNA levels. However, except for claudin-2, no notable alterations were detected in the protein levels of other TJ components. However, major TJ proteins (claudin-1, claudin-3, claudin-5, claudin-7, claudin-8 and occludin) analyzed were mislocalized to the basal cytoplasm and showed varying degrees of loss from the TJ and apico-lateral surfaces (121). A very recent study also showed an increased leak permeability in CFTR-KO enteroids to Cascade Blue-labeled 3-kDa dextran and FITC-labeled 500-kDa dextran (122).
The CFTR deficiency has also been shown to significantly impact intestinal immune regulation and inflammatory responses. Studies in intestinal cell lines revealed that CFTR knockdown led to increased basal and IL-1β-stimulated secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-8 and IL-6, while anti-inflammatory IL-10 release remained unaffected, suggesting that CFTR primarily influences pro-inflammatory pathways (123). This heightened pro-inflammatory state was linked to enhanced activation of inflammatory signaling pathways, such as ERK1/2 MAPK, IκBα, and NF-κB. In vivo, sex-specific immune responses were observed in CFTR-KO mice, with females exhibiting increased eosinophil infiltration in the jejunal mucosa (123). In CFTR-KO ferrets, chronic immune activation with lymphoplasmacytic inflammation was observed in the intestinal lamina propria with severe villous atrophy in cases of extensive immune cell infiltration (117). These findings suggested that CFTR deficiency contributed to both immune dysregulation and structural intestinal damage, compromising gut function and potentially exacerbating systemic disease. Further studies on CFTR-KO mice demonstrated elevated fecal calprotectin (a marker of intestinal inflammation) and increased intestinal permeability (as assessed by FITC-Dextran) suggesting compromised gut barrier function (114`), (115). It should be noted that unlike DRA-KO and PAT1-KO mice where there is no detectable intestinal inflammation at the basal level (but show increased susceptibility to inflammatory challenges), CFTR KO mice exhibit chronic gut inflammation as discussed above. Also, noteworthy is that the gut inflammation in CF patients was shown to be markedly distinct as compared to what is seen in CD (124), (125). Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of the CFTR-KO colons revealed a pro-inflammatory profile, with the upregulation of several chemokines and cytokines involved in immune cell recruitment and activation (115). These findings underscore the essential role of CFTR in maintaining intestinal immune homeostasis and preventing chronic inflammation (Table 1).
4. Targeting Microbiome Shifts to Restore Barrier Function and Immune Dysregulation in Gut Inflammation
Pathogenic bacteria are known to disrupt the gut barrier by dysregulation of TJ proteins, increasing intestinal permeability, and facilitating bacterial translocation. These disruptions increase susceptibility to inflammatory responses. In contrast, probiotic bacteria contribute significantly to the protection and restoration of this intestinal barrier through various mechanisms. These beneficial microbes exhibit antioxidant properties that mitigate oxidative stress, stimulate the secretion of immunoglobulin A (IgA), upregulate the expression of TJ proteins and mucus production. This enhances the physical integrity of the epithelial layer, creating a robust barrier function. Additionally, probiotics modulate immune responses by promoting anti-inflammatory markers, suppressing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and also inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways. These activities collectively help to reduce inflammation and maintain epithelial homeostasis. Probiotics also improve transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), an indicator of barrier integrity, reduce mucosal permeability and stimulate colonic epithelial cell proliferation, thereby strengthening the intestinal barrier. The strain-specific activities of gut microbes underscore their dual roles in either preserving or disrupting gut barrier function. This highlights their critical importance in maintaining gut homeostasis, regulating immune responses and influencing the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and related diseases. In recent studies, our group has also shown that some species of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria can increase the function and expression of DRA and L. acidophillus was shown to have anti-inflammatory effects in C.rodentium and DSS colitis models (126), (127), (128), (129), (15). A comprehensive catalog of gut microbes implicated in barrier integrity and inflammation, along with those altered due to dysregulation of anion transporters, is presented in Table 2.
Table 2:
Predominant microbiota linked with gut barrier integrity and/or inflammation as well as microbiota altered in response to dysregulated anion transporters.
| Genus and/species | Barrier Integrity |
Affected TJ/AJ proteins/transcripts |
Gut inflammation/ cytokines and other factors |
References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bifidobacterium |
|
|
Occludin(c,p) Clau3-4(c,m,p) ZO-1(c,m,p) E-cadherin(c,m) |
|
IL10(c,m) IL6(c,m) PPARγ(c,m) MUC2(c,m) SCFAs Tregs Dendritic cells macrophage TEER (cl) IgA secretion(s,p) Antioxidant enzymes(c,m) |
(145), (146), (147), (148), (149), (150), (151), (152) |
|
|
IL1β(c,m) TNF-α(c,m) FITC-Dextran(s) NF-κB signaling | |||||
| Lactobacillus |
|
|
Occludin(c,m) Clau4(c,m) ZO-1(c,m) E-Cadherin(c,m) |
|
Proliferation of colonic epithelial cells TEER(cl) SCFAs Tregs Dendritic cells |
(153), (150), (154), (155) |
|
|
FITC-Dextran(s,p) IL4(c,p) IL6(c,p) IFNγ(c,p) NF-κB signaling |
|||||
| Faecalibacterium prausnitzii |
|
|
Occludin(c,m) ZO-1(c,m) Ecadherin(c,m) |
|
IL10(s,hpb) SCFAs Tregs Dendritic cells |
(153), (156), (150), (157), (158) |
|
|
IL4(c,p) IL6(c,p) IFNγ(c,p) IL12(c,p) NF-κB signaling FITC-Dextran(s,p) |
|||||
| E. coli Nissle 19 |
|
|
ZO-1-2(c,m,p) Clau14(e,m) MUC-3(c,m) |
|
Secrete microcins Dendritic cells Monocytes Macrophages Gamma Delta T cells |
(159), (160), (161), (162), (163) |
|
|
TNF(c,m) IL1β(c,m) IL2(c,m) MCP-1(c,m) MIP-2(c,m) MMP-9(c,m) |
|||||
| E. coli |
|
|
IL1β(s,p) IL18(s,p) NLRP3 inflammasomes (int) Dendritic cells |
(160), (164), (165), (166) | ||
|
|
ZO-1(c,p) Occludin(c,p) |
|||||
| Akkermansia mucinaphila |
|
|
Occludin(c,m,p) Clau1(c,m,p) ZO-1(c,m) |
|
IL10(c,m,p) Mucin production SCFAs CD8+ T cells |
(150), (167), (168) |
|
|
IL1β(c,m,p) IL-6(c,m,p) TNFα(c,m,p) |
|||||
|
Bacteroides vulgatus and
B. dorei |
|
|
ZO-1 (c,m,p) |
|
SCFAs Bregs Dendritic cells |
(150), (169), (170), (171) |
|
|
LPS production(pl) IL-6(pl,p) IFNγ(pl,p) TNFα(pl,p) |
|||||
| Bacteroides ovatus |
|
|
ZO-1(c,p) Occludin(c,p) |
|
IL22(c,m,p) IL10(int,m) MUC2(c,m) Goblet cells production Epithelial cell proliferation Dendritic cells |
(172), (173), (174), (175) |
|
|
TNFα(s,p,) IL1β(s,p) Endotoxin(s,p) IL6(s,p) Amyloid A(s,p) IL8(s,p) MCP1(s,p) |
|||||
| Parabacteroides |
|
|
ZO-1(c,m,p) Occludin(c,m,p) |
|
SCFAs CD8+ T cells Tregs |
(176), (177), (178), (179) |
|
|
IL4(c,p) TNFα(c,p) |
|||||
| Allobaculum |
|
(180), (181) | ||||
|
|
Degrade mucus layer | |||||
| Bacteroides acidifaciens |
|
|
ZO-1(c,p) Occludin(c,p) |
|
Maintain mucus distribution IgA production |
(182), (183) |
|
|
TNFα(s,p) IL1β(s,p) IL6(s,p) Apoptotic cells(c) |
|||||
| Streptococcus |
|
|
Tregs | (184), (185), (186) | ||
|
|
Occludin(cl,p) E-Cadherin(cl,p) |
|
TEER (cl) Viability(cl) |
|||
| Enterococcus |
|
|
Dendritic cells | (187), (188) | ||
|
|
E-Cadherin (c,p) |
|
TEER(c) | |||
| Clostridium spp. |
|
|
IL-1β(s,p) IL-6(s,p) TNF-α(s,p) Toxin production Mucus layer degradation NF-κB activation Tregs |
(189), (190), (191), (192), (193) | ||
|
|
ZO-1(j,m) Occludin(j,m) Clau1(j,m) Redistribution of ZO-1(hio) Occludin(hio) Ecadherin (hio) |
|
Muc2 (j) | |||
| Ruminococcus gnavus |
|
|
Zonulin (s,p) |
|
FITC-Dextran(p) TNFα(mbmd) Tregs |
(194), (195), (196), (197) |
|
|
Altered mucus production | |||||
| Lachnoclostridium |
|
|
SCFAs production CD8+ T cells |
(198), (199), (200) | ||
| Odoribacter |
|
|
IL10(hpb,p) Tregs |
(201), (202), (203) | ||
|
|
IL6(s,p) | |||||
| Shigella |
|
|
IL8(cl,p) TNFα(hpb,p) FITC-Dextran(cl) CD4+ T cells |
(204), (205), (206), (207) | ||
|
|
ZO-1(cl,p) Occludin(cl,p) Clau1 (cl,p) |
|
TEER(cl) Viability(cl) |
|||
FITC) Fluorescein Isothiocyanate; (ZO) Zonula Occludens; (TNF) Tumor Necrosis Factor; (IFN) Interferon; (IL) Interleukin; (TJ) Tight Junction; (AJ) Adherens Junction; (MCP) Monocyte chemoattractant protein; (MIP) Macrophage inflammatory protein; (MMP) Matrix metalloproteinase; (TEER) Trans-epithelial electrical resistance; (ZO) Zonula Occludens; (Clau) Claudin; (SCFAs) Short-chain fatty acids; (NLRP) NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein; (CD) cluster of differentiation; (NF-κB) Nuclear factor-kappa B; (Tregs) Regulatory T cells; (Bregs) Regulatory B cells; (IgA) Immunoglobulin A; (PPAR) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; (cl)- cell lines; (d) duodenum; (j) jejunum; (int) intestine (intestinal mucosa/cells); (c) colon; (s) serum; (m) mRNA; (p) protein; (pl) plasma; (hio) human intestinal organoids; (mbmd) mouse bone marrow dendritic cells; (hpb,) human peripheral blood mononuclear cells; (e) epithelial cells;
Upregulated gene/protein expression/function;
Downregulation gene/protein expression/function.
a). Microbiome shifts affect SCFA levels that are critical for gut barrier integrity
The intestinal microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier, primarily through the production of SCFAs. SCFAs, primarily butyrate, propionate, and acetate, are the products of bacterial fermentation of indigestible fibers, constituting 95% of SCFAs in the colon and human feces (130). SCFAs perform a range of physiological functions in the intestine, including the maintenance of homeostasis, induction of epithelial barrier function, and regulation of intestinal epithelial cell turnover (130). Additionally, they stimulate mucin synthesis and help preserve gut barrier integrity by promoting TJ assembly (131). Alterations in the microbiome composition can have either positive or negative effects on gut barrier integrity via alterations in SCFA levels. For example, dietary interventions that increase fiber intake have been shown to shift the gut microbiome towards increased production of SCFAs like butanoate, which in turn upregulates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and enhances intestinal barrier function (132). Disruptions in the microbiome, such as those caused by antibiotics or dietary changes, can lead to decreased SCFA production and compromised intestinal barrier integrity. Antibiotic treatment, also, has been shown to reduce SCFA concentrations and disrupt TJ protein expression, leading to increased intestinal permeability (133). Similarly, circadian rhythm disruptions, such as those experienced by shift workers, can alter SCFA levels and increase colonic permeability, further compromising the intestinal barrier (134`), (135). In summary, the gut microbiome and its production of SCFAs are integral to maintaining intestinal barrier integrity.
b). Dysbiosis leads to alterations in bile acid composition leading to barrier disruption
An imbalance in the gut microbiota can lead to alterations in bile acid composition, which in turn can disrupt the intestinal barrier. This relationship is evident in various conditions, including liver diseases, IBD and traumatic brain injury (136`), (137), (138). Dysbiosis alters bile acid profiles, decreasing secondary bile acids and increasing primary bile acids, which disrupts the gut barrier and promotes inflammation (139`), (138), (140). In conditions like IBD, impaired bile acid transformation exacerbates this imbalance, weakening the gut barrier and immune response (138`), (140). Interestingly, recent studies from our group have shown that DRA-KO mice showed altered fecal bile acid profile similar to IBD (141). In conclusion, the disruption of gut microbiota balance and subsequent alterations in bile acid composition also play a critical role in compromising intestinal barrier integrity and promoting inflammation.
c). Dysbiosis and Immune Cell Dysregulation
Dysbiosis also has profound implications for immune regulation, particularly targeting regulatory T cells (Tregs). The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in shaping the immune system, and disruptions in microbial homeostasis can result in immune dysregulation. Exposure to antibiotics during early life is a key factor contributing to dysbiotic microbiota, which impairs the development of colonic Tregs. This dysbiosis selectively depletes neuropilin-negative, RORγt-, and Foxp3-positive Tregs, leading to dysregulated immune responses (142). The absence of these Tregs is strongly associated with heightened susceptibility to immune disorders. Aging further compounds these effects by altering gut microbiota composition, resulting in a decline in dendritic cell tolerance and impaired Treg function. This age-related dysbiosis is marked by a reduction in beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus, which are critical for maintaining immune tolerance (143). Restoration of these beneficial bacteria has been shown to reinstate the tolerogenic function of dendritic cells and enhance Treg activity. Genetic predispositions, such as haploinsufficiency of A20 (HA20), further exacerbate dysbiosis and Treg dysregulation (144). This underscores the intricate interplay between genetic factors and microbial environments in modulating immune responses. Interestingly, both DRA-KO and CFTR-KO mice showed gut microbial dysbiosis with immune cell dysregulation indicating the potential role of anion transporters in contributing to gut inflammation (31`), (64). Overall, dysbiosis significantly disrupts immune cell regulation, particularly Tregs, leading to immune dysregulation and heightened susceptibility to various immune diseases.
5. Conclusions
As highlighted in this review article, recent advancements including contributions from our group and others, have highlighted the emergence of critical roles of key apical anion transporters (DRA, PAT1 and CFTR) in maintaining microbial and mucosal homeostasis. Dysregulation of these transporters have been associated with microbial dysbiosis, compromised barrier integrity and increased susceptibility to gut inflammation. Loss of DRA and CFTR have also been linked to alterations in mucosal immune cell dysfunction. However, similar studies for PAT1 are still lacking. In case of loss of DRA, an altered epithelial immune cell crosstalk appears to underlie observed dysregulation in immune cells. A critical gap in the knowledge persists regarding how disruptions in anion transporters specifically drive microbial dysbiosis and compromised barrier integrity ultimately leading to higher susceptibility to gut inflammation. It is hypothesized that these effects may arise from changes in luminal pH or ion composition, causing alterations in the intestinal microenvironment which can create selective pressures on the microbiota, allowing some microbes to thrive while restricting the growth of others. This imbalance, or dysbiosis, can increase the host’s vulnerability to inflammatory or infectious diseases, which in turn can further modify the gut microbiome. Further studies are needed to dissect out the role of these luminal factors in affecting barrier integrity, microbiome and immune cell function. In addition, age-dependent variations in ion transporter activities may also influence microbiome composition and susceptibility to inflammation, adding another layer of complexity to these interactions. Also, clarifying whether microbiome alterations precede barrier dysfunction or vice versa is essential for a better understanding of the sequence of events.
Similar to studies in DRA-KO mice, comparable data for immune cell dysregulation and mechanisms underlying are currently unavailable for CFTR-KO and PAT1-KO models Also, very limited studies are available on some of the other intestinal anion transporters, such as CaCC, ClC2, SLC26A1, SLC26A5 and SLC26A9 particularly relating to their potential roles in dysbiosis, barrier integrity and susceptibility to gut inflammation. Also, there is a need for comparing and contrasting the data from various anion transporter KO models as well as more studies are warranted utilizing transgenic overexpressor mice for these transporters for a better understanding of their roles in gut homeostasis to address these gaps in knowledge.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
These studies were supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Merit Review Award: BX002011 (PKD), VA-BCCMA Award: BX005862 (PKD), VA Merit Award: BX006626 (AK), Department of Veterans Affairs I01BX006177 (RKG) and VA Senior Research Career Scientist Award: 1IK6BX005242 (PKD). The studies were also supported by NIH/NIDDK grants, R01DK54016 (PKD), R56DK92441 (PKD).
All figures were created with BioRender.com.
List of Abbreviations
- ABCC7
ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 7
- AJ
Adherens Junction
- AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase
- ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
- cAMP
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate
- CCL
CC chemokine ligand
- CD
cluster of differentiation
- CFTR
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
- CF
Cystic fibrosis
- Cl−
Chloride ion
- CLD
Congenital chloride diarrhea
- CXCL
CXC chemokine ligand
- CUGBP1
CUG-Binding protein 1
- DSS
Dextran sodium sulphate
- DRA
Down regulated in adenoma
- FITC
Fluorescein isothiocyanate
- H+
hydrogen ion
- HA20
Haploinsufficiency of A20
- HCO3−
Bicarbonate ion
- HNF
Hepatocyte nuclear factor
- HuR
Human antigen R
- IBD
Inflammatory bowel diseases
- IFN
Interferon
- IgA
Immunoglobulin A
- IL
Interleukin
- KO
Knockout
- mRNA
Messenger-RNA
- Na+
Sodium ion
- OTU
Operational taxonomic units
- PAT1
Putative anion transporter-1
- Pmp22
Peripheral myelin protein 22
- SCFAs
Short-chain fatty acids
- TEER
Trans-epithelial electrical resistance
- TJ
Tight Junction
- TNBS
2,4,6-Trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid
- TNF
Tumor necrosis factor
- Tregs
Regulatory T cells
- WT
Wild type
- UC
Ulcerative colitis
- UTR
Untranslated regions
- ZO
Zonula occludens
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest & Disclosures: None
Disclaimer: The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
References:
- 1.Das S, Jayaratne R, and Barrett KE. The Role of Ion Transporters in the Pathophysiology of Infectious Diarrhea. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 33–45, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Melvin JE, Park K, Richardson L, Schultheis PJ, and Shull GE. Mouse down-regulated in adenoma (DRA) is an intestinal Cl(−)/HCO(3)(−) exchanger and is up-regulated in colon of mice lacking the NHE3 Na(+)/H(+) exchanger. J Biol Chem 274: 22855–22861, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tse CM, Yin J, Singh V, Sarker R, Lin R, Verkman AS, Turner JR, and Donowitz M. cAMP Stimulates SLC26A3 Activity in Human Colon by a CFTR-Dependent Mechanism That Does Not Require CFTR Activity. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: 641–653, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shao XX, Lin DP, Sun L, Wu CQ, Yang W, and Jiang Y. Association of ulcerative colitis with solute-linked carrier family 26 member A3 gene polymorphisms and its expression in colonic tissues in Chinese patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 33: 1169–1172, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Asano K, Matsushita T, Umeno J, Hosono N, Takahashi A, Kawaguchi T, Matsumoto T, Matsui T, Kakuta Y, Kinouchi Y, Shimosegawa T, Hosokawa M, Arimura Y, Shinomura Y, Kiyohara Y, Tsunoda T, Kamatani N, Iida M, Nakamura Y, and Kubo M. A genome-wide association study identifies three new susceptibility loci for ulcerative colitis in the Japanese population. Nat Genet 41: 1325–1329, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang SK, Jung Y, Kim H, Hong M, Ye BD, and Song K. Association of FCGR2A, JAK2 or HNF4A variants with ulcerative colitis in Koreans. Dig Liver Dis 43: 856–861, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kumar A, Jayawardena D, Priyamvada S, Anbazhagan AN, Chatterjee I, Saksena S, and Dudeja PK. SLC26A3 (DRA, the Congenital Chloride Diarrhea Gene): A Novel Therapeutic Target for Diarrheal Diseases. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 101452, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Norsa L, Berni Canani R, Duclaux-Loras R, Bequet E, Koglmeier J, Russell RK, Uhlig HH, Travis S, Hollis J, Koletzko S, Grimaldi G, Castaldo G, Rodrigues A, Deflandre J, Dembinski L, Shah N, Heinz-Erian P, Janecke A, Leskinen S, Wedenoja S, Koskela R, Lachaux A, Kolho KL, and Ruemmele FM. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients with Congenital Chloride Diarrhoea. J Crohns Colitis 15: 1679–1685, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schweinfest CW, Spyropoulos DD, Henderson KW, Kim JH, Chapman JM, Barone S, Worrell RT, Wang Z, and Soleimani M. slc26a3 (dra)-deficient mice display chloride-losing diarrhea, enhanced colonic proliferation, and distinct up-regulation of ion transporters in the colon. J Biol Chem 281: 37962–37971, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wedenoja S, Pekansaari E, Hoglund P, Makela S, Holmberg C, and Kere J. Update on SLC26A3 mutations in congenital chloride diarrhea. Hum Mutat 32: 715–722, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Priyamvada S, Gomes R, Gill RK, Saksena S, Alrefai WA, and Dudeja PK. Mechanisms Underlying Dysregulation of Electrolyte Absorption in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Diarrhea. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21: 2926–2935, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gill RK, Borthakur A, Hodges K, Turner JR, Clayburgh DR, Saksena S, Zaheer A, Ramaswamy K, Hecht G, and Dudeja PK. Mechanism underlying inhibition of intestinal apical Cl/OH exchange following infection with enteropathogenic E. coli. J Clin Invest 117: 428–437, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quach A, Jayaratne RR, Lee BJ, Ibeawuchi SR, Lim E, Das S, and Barrett KE. Diarrhoeal pathogenesis in Salmonella infection may result from an imbalance in intestinal epithelial differentiation through reduced Notch signalling. J Physiol 600: 1851–1865, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Borenshtein D, McBee ME, and Schauer DB. Utility of the Citrobacter rodentium infection model in laboratory mice. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 24: 32–37, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar A, Anbazhagan AN, Coffing H, Chatterjee I, Priyamvada S, Gujral T, Saksena S, Gill RK, Alrefai WA, Borthakur A, and Dudeja PK. Lactobacillus acidophilus counteracts inhibition of NHE3 and DRA expression and alleviates diarrheal phenotype in mice infected with Citrobacter rodentium. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 311: G817–G826, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar A, Jayawardena D, Anbazhagan AN, Chatterjee I, Priyamvada S, Alrefai WA, Borthakur A, and Dudeja PK. Decreased SLC26A3 expression and function in intestinal epithelial cells in response to Cryptosporidium parvum infection. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 317: C1205–C1212, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coffing H, Priyamvada S, Anbazhagan AN, Salibay C, Engevik M, Versalovic J, Yacyshyn MB, Yacyshyn B, Tyagi S, Saksena S, Gill RK, Alrefai WA, and Dudeja PK. Clostridium difficile toxins A and B decrease intestinal SLC26A3 protein expression. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 315: G43–G52, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang J, Ortiz C, Fontenot L, Mukhopadhyay R, Xie Y, Chen X, Feng H, Pothoulakis C, and Koon HW. Therapeutic Mechanism of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 alpha Neutralizing Antibody (CCL3) in Clostridium difficile Infection in Mice. J Infect Dis 221: 1623–1635, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu Q Slc26a3 (DRA) in the Gut: Expression, Function, Regulation, Role in Infectious Diarrhea and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 27: 575–584, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh V, Kumar A, Raheja G, Anbazhagan AN, Priyamvada S, Saksena S, Jhandier MN, Gill RK, Alrefai WA, Borthakur A, and Dudeja PK. Lactobacillus acidophilus attenuates downregulation of DRA function and expression in inflammatory models. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 307: G623–631, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu L, Xiao F, He J, Lan X, Ding Q, Li J, Seidler U, Zheng Y, and Tian D. Lysophosphatidic acid increases SLC26A3 expression in inflamed intestine and reduces diarrheal severity in C57BL/6 mice with dextran-sodium-sulfate-induced colitis. Chin Med J (Engl) 127: 1737–1743, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jayawardena D Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Nanomedicine for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. University of Illinois at Chicago, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jayawardena D, Tyagi S, Nazmi A, Olivares-Villagomez D, and Dudeja PK. Ion Transport Basis of Diarrhea in a Mouse Model of Adoptive T Cell Transfer Colitis. Dig Dis Sci 65: 1700–1709, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jayawardena D, Anbazhagan AN, Majumder A, Akram R, Nazmi A, Kaur R, Kumar A, Saksena S, Olivares-Villagomez D, and Dudeja PK. Ion Transport Basis of Diarrhea, Paneth Cell Metaplasia, and Upregulation of Mechanosensory Pathway in Anti-CD40 Colitis Mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis 30: 1454–1466, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ding X, Li D, Li M, Wang H, He Q, Wang Y, Yu H, Tian D, and Yu Q. SLC26A3 (DRA) prevents TNF-alpha-induced barrier dysfunction and dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute colitis. Lab Invest 98: 462–476, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tessema T, Cinar A, Riederer B, Bleich A, Westendorf A, Buer J, Manns M, and Seidler U. Alterations of expression and function of the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 during early in-flammation in IL-10 knockout Mouse. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie 44: P103, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar A, Priyamvada S, Ge Y, Jayawardena D, Singhal M, Anbazhagan AN, Chatterjee I, Dayal A, Patel M, Zadeh K, Saksena S, Alrefai WA, Gill RK, Zadeh M, Zhao N, Mohamadzadeh M, and Dudeja PK. A Novel Role of SLC26A3 in the Maintenance of Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Integrity. Gastroenterology 160: 1240–1255 e1243, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kini A, Singh AK, Riederer B, Yang I, Tan X, di Stefano G, Tan Q, Xiao F, Xia W, Suerbaum S, and Seidler U. Slc26a3 deletion alters pH-microclimate, mucin biosynthesis, microbiome composition and increases the TNFalpha expression in murine colon. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 230: e13498, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiao F, Yu Q, Li J, Johansson ME, Singh AK, Xia W, Riederer B, Engelhardt R, Montrose M, Soleimani M, Tian DA, Xu G, Hansson GC, and Seidler U. Slc26a3 deficiency is associated with loss of colonic HCO3 (−) secretion, absence of a firm mucus layer and barrier impairment in mice. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 211: 161–175, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kini A, Zhao B, Basic M, Roy U, Iljazovic A, Odak I, Ye Z, Riederer B, Di Stefano G, Romermann D, Koenecke C, Bleich A, Strowig T, and Seidler U. Upregulation of antimicrobial peptide expression in slc26a3−/− mice with colonic dysbiosis and barrier defect. Gut Microbes 14: 2041943, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jayawardena D, Priyamvada S, Kageyama T, White Z, Kumar A, Griggs TF, Majumder A, Akram R, Anbazhagan AN, Sano T, and Dudeja PK. Loss of SLC26A3 Results in Colonic Mucosal Immune Dysregulation via Epithelial-Immune Cell Crosstalk. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 15: 903–919, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang J, Wang W, Wang H, and Tuo B. Physiological and Pathological Functions of SLC26A6. Front Med (Lausanne) 7: 618256, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lohi H, Lamprecht G, Markovich D, Heil A, Kujala M, Seidler U, and Kere J. Isoforms of SLC26A6 mediate anion transport and have functional PDZ interaction domains. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C769–779, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alshaikh AE, and Hassan HA. Gut-kidney axis in oxalate homeostasis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 30: 264–274, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saksena S, Dwivedi A, Singla A, Gill RK, Tyagi S, Borthakur A, Alrefai WA, Ramaswamy K, and Dudeja PK. Characterization of the 5'-flanking region and regulation of expression of human anion exchanger SLC26A6. J Cell Biochem 105: 454–466, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jung D, Alshaikh A, Ratakonda S, Bashir M, Amin R, Jeon S, Stevens J, Sharma S, Ahmed W, Musch M, and Hassan H. Adenosinergic signaling inhibits oxalate transport by human intestinal Caco2-BBE cells through the A(2B) adenosine receptor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 315: C687–C698, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Perez-Torras S, Iglesias I, Llopis M, Lozano JJ, Antolin M, Guarner F, and Pastor-Anglada M. Transportome Profiling Identifies Profound Alterations in Crohn's Disease Partially Restored by Commensal Bacteria. J Crohns Colitis 10: 850–859, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kato A, and Romero MF. Regulation of electroneutral NaCl absorption by the small intestine. Annu Rev Physiol 73: 261–281, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Anbazhagan AN, Ge Y, Priyamvada S, Kumar A, Jayawardena D, Palani ARV, Husain N, Kulkarni N, Kapoor S, Kaur P, Majumder A, Lin YD, Maletta L, Gill RK, Alrefai WA, Saksena S, Zadeh K, Hong S, Mohamadzadeh M, and Dudeja PK. A Direct Link Implicating Loss of SLC26A6 to Gut Microbial Dysbiosis, Compromised Barrier Integrity, and Inflammation. Gastroenterology 167: 704–717 e703, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiang Z, Asplin JR, Evan AP, Rajendran VM, Velazquez H, Nottoli TP, Binder HJ, and Aronson PS. Calcium oxalate urolithiasis in mice lacking anion transporter Slc26a6. Nat Genet 38: 474–478, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Freel RW, Hatch M, Green M, and Soleimani M. Ileal oxalate absorption and urinary oxalate excretion are enhanced in Slc26a6 null mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G719–728, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sheppard DN, and Welsh MJ. Structure and function of the CFTR chloride channel. Physiol Rev 79: S23–45, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nilius B, and Droogmans G. Amazing chloride channels: an overview. Acta Physiol Scand 177: 119–147, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tummler B Puzzle resolved: CFTR mediates chloride homeostasis by segregating absorption and secretion to different cell types. J Clin Invest 133: 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Scott P, Anderson K, Singhania M, and Cormier R. Cystic Fibrosis, CFTR, and Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 21: 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liou TG. The Clinical Biology of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Protein: Its Role and Function in Extrapulmonary Disease. Chest 155: 605–616, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jakab RL, Collaco AM, and Ameen NA. Characterization of CFTR High Expresser cells in the intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 305: G453–465, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jakab RL, Collaco AM, and Ameen NA. Physiological relevance of cell-specific distribution patterns of CFTR, NKCC1, NBCe1, and NHE3 along the crypt-villus axis in the intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300: G82–98, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Strong TV, Boehm K, and Collins FS. Localization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mRNA in the human gastrointestinal tract by in situ hybridization. J Clin Invest 93: 347–354, 1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Morrison CB, Markovetz MR, and Ehre C. Mucus, mucins, and cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 54 Suppl 3: S84–S96, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Derichs N Targeting a genetic defect: cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev 22: 58–65, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tobias J, Tillotson M, Maloney L, and Fialkowski E. Meconium Ileus, Distal Intestinal Obstruction Syndrome, and Other Gastrointestinal Pathology in the Cystic Fibrosis Patient. Surg Clin North Am 102: 873–882, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chao AC, de Sauvage FJ, Dong YJ, Wagner JA, Goeddel DV, and Gardner P. Activation of intestinal CFTR Cl− channel by heat-stable enterotoxin and guanylin via cAMP-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J 13: 1065–1072, 1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cil O, Phuan PW, Gillespie AM, Lee S, Tradtrantip L, Yin J, Tse M, Zachos NC, Lin R, Donowitz M, and Verkman AS. Benzopyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine-dione CFTR inhibitor (R)-BPO-27 for antisecretory therapy of diarrheas caused by bacterial enterotoxins. FASEB J 31: 751–760, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Villeda-Ramirez MA, Meza-Guillen D, Barreto-Zuniga R, and Yamamoto-Furusho JK. ABCC7/CFTR Expression Is Associated with the Clinical Course of Ulcerative Colitis Patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021: 5536563, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chaun H Colonic disorders in adult cystic fibrosis. Can J Gastroenterol 15: 586–590, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shakhnovich V, Katta L, Christenson K, Bass J, Farrow E, Soden S, Smith L, and Saunders C. P-199 Pathogenic CFTR Mutation in Crohn's Disease in the Absence of Other CFTR-Related Manifestations. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 22: S69, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Trigo Salado C, Leo Carnerero E, and de la Cruz Ramirez MD. Crohn's disease and cystic fibrosis: there is still a lot to learn. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 110: 835–836, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vincenzi F, Bizzarri B, Ghiselli A, de' Angelis N, Fornaroli F, and de' Angelis GL. Cystic fibrosis and Crohn's disease: successful treatment and long term remission with infliximab. World J Gastroenterol 16: 1924–1927, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yu M, Zhang Q, Yuan K, Sazonovs A, Stevens C, Fachal L, International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics C, Anderson CA, Daly MJ, and Huang H. Cystic fibrosis risk variants confer protection against inflammatory bowel disease. medRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bresso F, Askling J, Astegiano M, Demarchi B, Sapone N, Rizzetto M, Gionchetti P, Lammers KM, de Leone A, Riegler G, Nimmo ER, Drummond H, Noble C, Torkvist L, Ekbom A, Zucchelli M, Lofberg R, Satsangi J, Pettersson S, and D'Amato M. Potential role for the common cystic fibrosis DeltaF508 mutation in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13: 531–536, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Walker NM, Simpson JE, Levitt RC, Boyle KT, and Clarke LL. Talniflumate increases survival in a cystic fibrosis mouse model of distal intestinal obstructive syndrome. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 317: 275–283, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Blanco PG, Zaman MM, Junaidi O, Sheth S, Yantiss RK, Nasser IA, and Freedman SD. Induction of colitis in cftr−/− mice results in bile duct injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 287: G491–496, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Scull CE, Luo M, Jennings S, Taylor CM, and Wang G. Cftr deletion in mouse epithelial and immune cells differentially influence the intestinal microbiota. Commun Biol 5: 1130, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nguyen TL, Vieira-Silva S, Liston A, and Raes J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis Model Mech 8: 1–16, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, and Relman DA. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308: 1635–1638, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ley RE, Backhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, and Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 11070–11075, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, and Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444: 1022–1023, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Engevik MA, and Versalovic J. Biochemical Features of Beneficial Microbes: Foundations for Therapeutic Microbiology. Microbiol Spectr 5: 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, and Gordon JI. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320: 1647–1651, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kostic AD, Howitt MR, and Garrett WS. Exploring host-microbiota interactions in animal models and humans. Genes Dev 27: 701–718, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cho I, and Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 13: 260–270, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Huse SM, Dethlefsen L, Huber JA, Mark Welch D, Relman DA, and Sogin ML. Exploring microbial diversity and taxonomy using SSU rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing. PLoS Genet 4: e1000255, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Krych L, Hansen CH, Hansen AK, van den Berg FW, and Nielsen DS. Quantitatively different, yet qualitatively alike: a meta-analysis of the mouse core gut microbiome with a view towards the human gut microbiome. PLoS One 8: e62578, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Aagaard K, Petrosino J, Keitel W, Watson M, Katancik J, Garcia N, Patel S, Cutting M, Madden T, Hamilton H, Harris E, Gevers D, Simone G, McInnes P, and Versalovic J. The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters. FASEB J 27: 1012–1022, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Human Microbiome Project C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486: 207–214, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Muegge BD, Kuczynski J, Knights D, Clemente JC, Gonzalez A, Fontana L, Henrissat B, Knight R, and Gordon JI. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 332: 970–974, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto JM, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Li S, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Dore J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J, Meta HITC, Bork P, Ehrlich SD, and Wang J. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464: 59–65, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Turnbaugh PJ, and Gordon JI. The core gut microbiome, energy balance and obesity. J Physiol 587: 4153–4158, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wong JM, de Souza R, Kendall CW, Emam A, and Jenkins DJ. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 40: 235–243, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kamada N, Seo SU, Chen GY, and Nunez G. Role of the gut microbiota in immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 321–335, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Maciel-Fiuza MF, Muller GC, Campos DMS, do Socorro Silva Costa P, Peruzzo J, Bonamigo RR, Veit T, and Vianna FSL. Role of gut microbiota in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front Microbiol 14: 1098386, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C, Vuyyuru H, Sasikala M, and Nageshwar Reddy D. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J Gastroenterol 21: 8787–8803, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, Ben-Yacov O, Lador D, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M, Suez J, Mahdi JA, Matot E, Malka G, Kosower N, Rein M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Dohnalova L, Pevsner-Fischer M, Bikovsky R, Halpern Z, Elinav E, and Segal E. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell 163: 1079–1094, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kostic AD, Gevers D, Siljander H, Vatanen T, Hyotylainen T, Hamalainen AM, Peet A, Tillmann V, Poho P, Mattila I, Lahdesmaki H, Franzosa EA, Vaarala O, de Goffau M, Harmsen H, Ilonen J, Virtanen SM, Clish CB, Oresic M, Huttenhower C, Knip M, Group DS, and Xavier RJ. The dynamics of the human infant gut microbiome in development and in progression toward type 1 diabetes. Cell Host Microbe 17: 260–273, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gill PA, Inniss S, Kumagai T, Rahman FZ, and Smith AM. The Role of Diet and Gut Microbiota in Regulating Gastrointestinal and Inflammatory Disease. Front Immunol 13: 866059, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Leeming ER, Johnson AJ, Spector TD, and Le Roy CI. Effect of Diet on the Gut Microbiota: Rethinking Intervention Duration. Nutrients 11: 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, Abrouk M, Farahnik B, Nakamura M, Zhu TH, Bhutani T, and Liao W. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med 15: 73, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, and Duncan SH. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 577–589, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, and Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ 361: k2179, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Iizumi T, Battaglia T, Ruiz V, and Perez Perez GI. Gut Microbiome and Antibiotics. Arch Med Res 48: 727–734, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fujisaka S, Ussar S, Clish C, Devkota S, Dreyfuss JM, Sakaguchi M, Soto M, Konishi M, Softic S, Altindis E, Li N, Gerber G, Bry L, and Kahn CR. Antibiotic effects on gut microbiota and metabolism are host dependent. J Clin Invest 126: 4430–4443, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Yassour M, Vatanen T, Siljander H, Hamalainen AM, Harkonen T, Ryhanen SJ, Franzosa EA, Vlamakis H, Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Lander ES, Knip M, Group DS, and Xavier RJ. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci Transl Med 8: 343ra381, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kim YS, and Ho SB. Intestinal goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: recent insights and progress. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 12: 319–330, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Schroeder BO. Fight them or feed them: how the intestinal mucus layer manages the gut microbiota. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 7: 3–12, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hylemon PB, Harris SC, and Ridlon JM. Metabolism of hydrogen gases and bile acids in the gut microbiome. FEBS Lett 592: 2070–2082, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ridlon JM, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB, and Bajaj JS. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 30: 332–338, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sagar NM, Cree IA, Covington JA, and Arasaradnam RP. The interplay of the gut microbiome, bile acids, and volatile organic compounds. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015: 398585, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Singh J, Metrani R, Shivanagoudra SR, Jayaprakasha GK, and Patil BS. Review on Bile Acids: Effects of the Gut Microbiome, Interactions with Dietary Fiber, and Alterations in the Bioaccessibility of Bioactive Compounds. J Agric Food Chem 67: 9124–9138, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Albenberg L, Esipova TV, Judge CP, Bittinger K, Chen J, Laughlin A, Grunberg S, Baldassano RN, Lewis JD, Li H, Thom SR, Bushman FD, Vinogradov SA, and Wu GD. Correlation between intraluminal oxygen gradient and radial partitioning of intestinal microbiota. Gastroenterology 147: 1055–1063 e1058, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Litvak Y, Byndloss MX, and Baumler AJ. Colonocyte metabolism shapes the gut microbiota. Science 362: 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Yasuda K, Oh K, Ren B, Tickle TL, Franzosa EA, Wachtman LM, Miller AD, Westmoreland SV, Mansfield KG, Vallender EJ, Miller GM, Rowlett JK, Gevers D, Huttenhower C, and Morgan XC. Biogeography of the intestinal mucosal and lumenal microbiome in the rhesus macaque. Cell Host Microbe 17: 385–391, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Scheithauer TP, Dallinga-Thie GM, de Vos WM, Nieuwdorp M, and van Raalte DH. Causality of small and large intestinal microbiota in weight regulation and insulin resistance. Mol Metab 5: 759–770, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Seekatz AM, Schnizlein MK, Koenigsknecht MJ, Baker JR, Hasler WL, Bleske BE, Young VB, and Sun D. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Stomach and Small-Intestinal Microbiota in Fasted Healthy Humans. mSphere 4: 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ilhan ZE, Marcus AK, Kang DW, Rittmann BE, and Krajmalnik-Brown R. pH-Mediated Microbial and Metabolic Interactions in Fecal Enrichment Cultures. mSphere 2: 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tresguerres M, Parks SK, Salazar E, Levin LR, Goss GG, and Buck J. Bicarbonate-sensing soluble adenylyl cyclase is an essential sensor for acid/base homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 442–447, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Engevik MA, Aihara E, Montrose MH, Shull GE, Hassett DJ, and Worrell RT. Loss of NHE3 alters gut microbiota composition and influences Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron growth. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 305: G697–711, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Larmonier CB, Laubitz D, Hill FM, Shehab KW, Lipinski L, Midura-Kiela MT, McFadden RM, Ramalingam R, Hassan KA, Golebiewski M, Besselsen DG, Ghishan FK, and Kiela PR. Reduced colonic microbial diversity is associated with colitis in NHE3-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 305: G667–677, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Xue J, Dominguez Rieg JA, Thomas L, White JR, and Rieg T. Intestine-Specific NHE3 Deletion in Adulthood Causes Microbial Dysbiosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12: 896309, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Harrison CA, Laubitz D, Ohland CL, Midura-Kiela MT, Patil K, Besselsen DG, Jamwal DR, Jobin C, Ghishan FK, and Kiela PR. Microbial dysbiosis associated with impaired intestinal Na(+)/H(+) exchange accelerates and exacerbates colitis in ex-germ free mice. Mucosal Immunol 11: 1329–1341, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Goto Y, and Kiyono H. Epithelial barrier: an interface for the cross-communication between gut flora and immune system. Immunol Rev 245: 147–163, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yu TX, Rao JN, Zou T, Liu L, Xiao L, Ouyang M, Cao S, Gorospe M, and Wang JY. Competitive binding of CUGBP1 and HuR to occludin mRNA controls its translation and modulates epithelial barrier function. Mol Biol Cell 24: 85–99, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Yu TX, Gu BL, Yan JK, Zhu J, Yan WH, Chen J, Qian LX, and Cai W. CUGBP1 and HuR regulate E-cadherin translation by altering recruitment of E-cadherin mRNA to processing bodies and modulate epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 310: C54–65, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Young SM, Woode RA, Williams EC, Ericsson AC, and Clarke LL. Fecal dysbiosis and inflammation in intestinal-specific Cftr knockout mice on regimens preventing intestinal obstruction. Physiol Genomics 56: 247–264, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Bertolini A, Bloks VW, Wilmink M, Bos E, van de Peppel IP, Eilers R, Prins S, Thomas R, de Bruin A, Verkade H, and Jonker JW. Treatment of intestinal and liver features in cystic fibrosis mice by the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol. J Cyst Fibros 23: 461–473, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Meeker SM, Mears KS, Sangwan N, Brittnacher MJ, Weiss EJ, Treuting PM, Tolley N, Pope CE, Hager KR, Vo AT, Paik J, Frevert CW, Hayden HS, Hoffman LR, Miller SI, and Hajjar AM. CFTR dysregulation drives active selection of the gut microbiome. PLoS Pathog 16: e1008251, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Sun X, Olivier AK, Yi Y, Pope CE, Hayden HS, Liang B, Sui H, Zhou W, Hager KR, Zhang Y, Liu X, Yan Z, Fisher JT, Keiser NW, Song Y, Tyler SR, Goeken JA, Kinyon JM, Radey MC, Fligg D, Wang X, Xie W, Lynch TJ, Kaminsky PM, Brittnacher MJ, Miller SI, Parekh K, Meyerholz DK, Hoffman LR, Frana T, Stewart ZA, and Engelhardt JF. Gastrointestinal pathology in juvenile and adult CFTR-knockout ferrets. Am J Pathol 184: 1309–1322, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hoffman LR, Pope CE, Hayden HS, Heltshe S, Levy R, McNamara S, Jacobs MA, Rohmer L, Radey M, Ramsey BW, Brittnacher MJ, Borenstein E, and Miller SI. Escherichia coli dysbiosis correlates with gastrointestinal dysfunction in children with cystic fibrosis. Clin Infect Dis 58: 396–399, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Manor O, Levy R, Pope CE, Hayden HS, Brittnacher MJ, Carr R, Radey MC, Hager KR, Heltshe SL, Ramsey BW, Miller SI, Hoffman LR, and Borenstein E. Metagenomic evidence for taxonomic dysbiosis and functional imbalance in the gastrointestinal tracts of children with cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 6: 22493, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nielsen S, Needham B, Leach ST, Day AS, Jaffe A, Thomas T, and Ooi CY. Disrupted progression of the intestinal microbiota with age in children with cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 6: 24857, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.De Lisle RC. Disrupted tight junctions in the small intestine of cystic fibrosis mice. Cell Tissue Res 355: 131–142, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Woode RA, Strubberg AM, Liu J, Walker NM, and Clarke LL. Increased activity of epithelial Cdc42 Rho GTPase and tight junction permeability in the Cftr knockout intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 327: G545–G557, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Crites KS, Morin G, Orlando V, Patey N, Cantin C, Martel J, Brochiero E, and Mailhot G. CFTR Knockdown induces proinflammatory changes in intestinal epithelial cells. J Inflamm (Lond) 12: 62, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Tam RY, van Dorst JM, McKay I, Coffey M, and Ooi CY. Intestinal Inflammation and Alterations in the Gut Microbiota in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of the Current Evidence, Pathophysiology and Future Directions. J Clin Med 11: 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dhaliwal J, Leach S, Katz T, Nahidi L, Pang T, Lee JM, Strachan R, Day AS, Jaffe A, and Ooi CY. Intestinal inflammation and impact on growth in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 60: 521–526, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Kumar A, Hecht C, Priyamvada S, Anbazhagan AN, Alakkam A, Borthakur A, Alrefai WA, Gill RK, and Dudeja PK. Probiotic Bifidobacterium species stimulate human SLC26A3 gene function and expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 307: C1084–1092, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Raheja G, Singh V, Ma K, Boumendjel R, Borthakur A, Gill RK, Saksena S, Alrefai WA, Ramaswamy K, and Dudeja PK. Lactobacillus acidophilus stimulates the expression of SLC26A3 via a transcriptional mechanism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 298: G395–401, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Borthakur A, Gill RK, Tyagi S, Koutsouris A, Alrefai WA, Hecht GA, Ramaswamy K, and Dudeja PK. The probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus stimulates chloride/hydroxyl exchange activity in human intestinal epithelial cells. J Nutr 138: 1355–1359, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Saksena S, Goyal S, Raheja G, Singh V, Akhtar M, Nazir TM, Alrefai WA, Gill RK, and Dudeja PK. Upregulation of P-glycoprotein by probiotics in intestinal epithelial cells and in the dextran sulfate sodium model of colitis in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300: G1115–1123, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, and Backhed F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell 165: 1332–1345, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Perez-Reytor D, Puebla C, Karahanian E, and Garcia K. Use of Short-Chain Fatty Acids for the Recovery of the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Affected by Bacterial Toxins. Front Physiol 12: 650313, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Li Q, Chen H, Zhang M, Wu T, and Liu R. Altered short chain fatty acid profiles induced by dietary fiber intervention regulate AMPK levels and intestinal homeostasis. Food Funct 10: 7174–7187, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Feng Y, Huang Y, Wang Y, Wang P, Song H, and Wang F. Antibiotics induced intestinal tight junction barrier dysfunction is associated with microbiota dysbiosis, activated NLRP3 inflammasome and autophagy. PLoS One 14: e0218384, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Swanson GR, Siskin J, Gorenz A, Shaikh M, Raeisi S, Fogg L, Forsyth C, and Keshavarzian A. Disrupted diurnal oscillation of gut-derived Short chain fatty acids in shift workers drinking alcohol: Possible mechanism for loss of resiliency of intestinal barrier in disrupted circadian host. Transl Res 221: 97–109, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Mortas H, Bilici S, Ozturk H, and Karakan T. Changes in intestinal parameters and their association with dietary patterns in rotational shift workers. Chronobiol Int 39: 872–885, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.You W, Zhu Y, Wei A, Du J, Wang Y, Zheng P, Tu M, Wang H, Wen L, and Yang X. Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Accompanied by Alterations of Bile Acid Profile. J Neurotrauma 39: 227–237, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Zhu F, Zheng S, Zhao M, Shi F, Zheng L, and Wang H. The regulatory role of bile acid microbiota in the progression of liver cirrhosis. Front Pharmacol 14: 1214685, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Yang M, Gu Y, Li L, Liu T, Song X, Sun Y, Cao X, Wang B, Jiang K, and Cao H. Bile Acid-Gut Microbiota Axis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Bench to Bedside. Nutrients 13: 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wang Y, Gao X, Zhang X, Xiao Y, Huang J, Yu D, Li X, Hu H, Ge T, Li D, and Zhang T. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with Altered Bile Acid Metabolism in Infantile Cholestasis. mSystems 4: 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Duboc H, Rajca S, Rainteau D, Benarous D, Maubert MA, Quervain E, Thomas G, Barbu V, Humbert L, Despras G, Bridonneau C, Dumetz F, Grill JP, Masliah J, Beaugerie L, Cosnes J, Chazouilleres O, Poupon R, Wolf C, Mallet JM, Langella P, Trugnan G, Sokol H, and Seksik P. Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 62: 531–539, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Anbazhagan AN KA, Priyamvada S, Husain N, Kulkarni N, Kapoor S, Gill RK, Saksena S, Alrefai W, Dudeja PK. DRA Deficiency in mice leads to altered fecal bile acid profile similar to IBD. Gastroenterology 166: 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Zhang X, Borbet TC, Fallegger A, Wipperman MF, Blaser MJ, and Muller A. An Antibiotic-Impacted Microbiota Compromises the Development of Colonic Regulatory T Cells and Predisposes to Dysregulated Immune Responses. mBio 12: 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Bashir H, Singh S, Singh RP, Agrewala JN, and Kumar R. Age-mediated gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes the loss of dendritic cells tolerance. Aging Cell 22: e13838, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Toyofuku E, Takeshita K, Ohnishi H, Kiridoshi Y, Masuoka H, Kadowaki T, Nishikomori R, Nishimura K, Kobayashi C, Ebato T, Shigemura T, Inoue Y, Suda W, Hattori M, Morio T, Honda K, and Kanegane H. Dysregulation of the Intestinal Microbiome in Patients With Haploinsufficiency of A20. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11: 787667, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Bergmann KR, Liu SX, Tian R, Kushnir A, Turner JR, Li HL, Chou PM, Weber CR, and De Plaen IG. Bifidobacteria stabilize claudins at tight junctions and prevent intestinal barrier dysfunction in mouse necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Pathol 182: 1595–1606, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Al-Sadi R, Dharmaprakash V, Nighot P, Guo S, Nighot M, Do T, and Ma TY. Bifidobacterium bifidum Enhances the Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Barrier and Protects against Intestinal Inflammation by Targeting the Toll-like Receptor-2 Pathway in an NF-kappaB-Independent Manner. Int J Mol Sci 22: 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.di Vito R, Conte C, and Traina G. A Multi-Strain Probiotic Formulation Improves Intestinal Barrier Function by the Modulation of Tight and Adherent Junction Proteins. Cells 11: 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Wang BG, Xu HB, Xu F, Zeng ZL, and Wei H. Efficacy of oral Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 29521 on microflora and antioxidant in mice. Can J Microbiol 62: 249–262, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Din AU, Hassan A, Zhu Y, Zhang K, Wang Y, Li T, Wang Y, and Wang G. Inhibitory effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 29521 on colitis and its mechanism. J Nutr Biochem 79: 108353, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Shin Y, Han S, Kwon J, Ju S, Choi TG, Kang I, and Kim SS. Roles of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 15: 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Wang R, Kuerman M, Cui Q, Tian X, Zhou Y, Yi H, Gong P, Lin K, Zhang Z, Liu T, and Zhang L. Protective effects of Bifidobacterium bifidum FL-228.1 on dextran sulfate sodium-induced intestinal damage in mice. Eur J Nutr 62: 1267–1280, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Gavzy SJ, Kensiski A, Lee ZL, Mongodin EF, Ma B, and Bromberg JS. Bifidobacterium mechanisms of immune modulation and tolerance. Gut Microbes 15: 2291164, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Laval L, Martin R, Natividad JN, Chain F, Miquel S, Desclee de Maredsous C, Capronnier S, Sokol H, Verdu EF, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Smokvina T, and Langella P. Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 and the commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165 exhibit similar protective effects to induced barrier hyper-permeability in mice. Gut Microbes 6: 1–9, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Xie J, Nie S, Yu Q, Yin J, Xiong T, Gong D, and Xie M. Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 Attenuates Cyclophosphamide-Induced Immunosuppression and Regulates Th17/Treg Cell Immune Responses in Mice. J Agric Food Chem 64: 1291–1297, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL, Bavari S, and Klaenhammer TR. Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew T cells toward T helper 1 polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 2880–2885, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Lopez-Siles M, Duncan SH, Garcia-Gil LJ, and Martinez-Medina M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J 11: 841–852, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Alameddine J, Godefroy E, Papargyris L, Sarrabayrouse G, Tabiasco J, Bridonneau C, Yazdanbakhsh K, Sokol H, Altare F, and Jotereau F. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Skews Human DC to Prime IL10-Producing T Cells Through TLR2/6/JNK Signaling and IL-10, IL-27, CD39, and IDO-1 Induction. Front Immunol 10: 143, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Qiu X, Zhang M, Yang X, Hong N, and Yu C. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii upregulates regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines in treating TNBS-induced colitis. J Crohns Colitis 7: e558–568, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Garrido-Mesa N, Utrilla P, Comalada M, Zorrilla P, Garrido-Mesa J, Zarzuelo A, Rodriguez-Cabezas ME, and Galvez J. The association of minocycline and the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 results in an additive beneficial effect in a DSS model of reactivated colitis in mice. Biochem Pharmacol 82: 1891–1900, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Ukena SN, Singh A, Dringenberg U, Engelhardt R, Seidler U, Hansen W, Bleich A, Bruder D, Franzke A, Rogler G, Suerbaum S, Buer J, Gunzer F, and Westendorf AM. Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 inhibits leaky gut by enhancing mucosal integrity. PLoS One 2: e1308, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Guzy C, Paclik D, Schirbel A, Sonnenborn U, Wiedenmann B, and Sturm A. The probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 induces gammadelta T cell apoptosis via caspase- and FasL-dependent pathways. Int Immunol 20: 829–840, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Helmy YA, Kassem II, and Rajashekara G. Immuno-modulatory effect of probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 in polarized human colonic cells against Campylobacter jejuni infection. Gut Microbes 13: 1–16, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Guttsches AK, Loseke S, Zahringer U, Sonnenborn U, Enders C, Gatermann S, and Bufe A. Anti-inflammatory modulation of immune response by probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 in human blood mononuclear cells. Innate Immun 18: 204–216, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Zhang Q, Li Q, Wang C, Liu X, Li N, and Li J. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli changes distribution of occludin and ZO-1 in tight junction membrane microdomains in vivo. Microb Pathog 48: 28–34, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Wang H, Shan CL, Gao B, Xiao JL, Shen J, Zhao JG, Han DM, Chen BX, Wang S, Liu G, Xin AG, Lv LB, Xiao P, and Gao H. Yersiniabactin-Producing E. coli Induces the Pyroptosis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells via the NLRP3 Pathway and Promotes Gut Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 24: 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Wong KA, and Rodriguez A. Plasmodium infection and endotoxic shock induce the expansion of regulatory dendritic cells. J Immunol 180: 716–726, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Zhang H, Pan Y, Jiang Y, Chen M, Ma X, Yu X, Ren D, and Jiang B. Akkermansia muciniphila ONE effectively ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. NPJ Sci Food 8: 97, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Wang L, Tang L, Feng Y, Zhao S, Han M, Zhang C, Yuan G, Zhu J, Cao S, Wu Q, Li L, and Zhang Z. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurised bacterium blunts colitis associated tumourigenesis by modulation of CD8(+) T cells in mice. Gut 69: 1988–1997, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Yoshida N, Emoto T, Yamashita T, Watanabe H, Hayashi T, Tabata T, Hoshi N, Hatano N, Ozawa G, Sasaki N, Mizoguchi T, Amin HZ, Hirota Y, Ogawa W, Yamada T, and Hirata KI. Bacteroides vulgatus and Bacteroides dorei Reduce Gut Microbial Lipopolysaccharide Production and Inhibit Atherosclerosis. Circulation 138: 2486–2498, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Maerz JK, Trostel C, Lange A, Parusel R, Michaelis L, Schafer A, Yao H, Low HC, and Frick JS. Bacterial Immunogenicity Is Critical for the Induction of Regulatory B Cells in Suppressing Inflammatory Immune Responses. Front Immunol 10: 3093, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Maerz JK, Steimle A, Lange A, Bender A, Fehrenbacher B, and Frick JS. Outer membrane vesicles blebbing contributes to B. vulgatus mpk-mediated immune response silencing. Gut Microbes 9: 1–12, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Nie Q, Sun Y, Hu W, Chen C, Lin Q, and Nie S. Glucomannan promotes Bacteroides ovatus to improve intestinal barrier function and ameliorate insulin resistance. Imeta 3: e163, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ihekweazu FD, Engevik MA, Ruan W, Shi Z, Fultz R, Engevik KA, Chang-Graham AL, Freeborn J, Park ES, Venable S, Horvath TD, Haidacher SJ, Haag AM, Goodwin A, Schady DA, Hyser JM, Spinler JK, Liu Y, and Versalovic J. Bacteroides ovatus Promotes IL-22 Production and Reduces Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid-Driven Colonic Inflammation. Am J Pathol 191: 704–719, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Ihekweazu FD, Fofanova TY, Queliza K, Nagy-Szakal D, Stewart CJ, Engevik MA, Hulten KG, Tatevian N, Graham DY, Versalovic J, Petrosino JF, and Kellermayer R. Bacteroides ovatus ATCC 8483 monotherapy is superior to traditional fecal transplant and multi-strain bacteriotherapy in a murine colitis model. Gut Microbes 10: 504–520, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Si ZL, Wang HY, Wang T, Cao YZ, Li QZ, Liu K, Huang Z, Liu HL, Tan YJ, Wang YY, Huang FQ, Ma GX, Alolga RN, Yan M, Chen C, Li JH, Li J, Liu HW, and Zhang ZH. Gut Bacteroides ovatus ameliorates renal fibrosis by promoting the production of HDCA through upregulation of Clostridium scindens. Cell Rep 43: 114830, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Koh GY, Kane AV, Wu X, and Crott JW. Parabacteroides distasonis attenuates tumorigenesis, modulates inflammatory markers and promotes intestinal barrier integrity in azoxymethane-treated A/J mice. Carcinogenesis 41: 909–917, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Cui Y, Zhang L, Wang X, Yi Y, Shan Y, Liu B, Zhou Y, and Lu X. Roles of intestinal Parabacteroides in human health and diseases. FEMS Microbiol Lett 369: 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Liang R, Li P, Yang N, Xiao X, Gong J, Zhang X, Bai Y, Chen Y, Xie Z, and Liao Q. Parabacteroides distasonis-Derived Outer Membrane Vesicles Enhance Antitumor Immunity Against Colon Tumors by Modulating CXCL10 and CD8(+) T Cells. Drug Des Devel Ther 18: 1833–1853, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Cuffaro B, Assohoun ALW, Boutillier D, Sukenikova L, Desramaut J, Boudebbouze S, Salome-Desnoulez S, Hrdy J, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Maguin E, and Grangette C. In Vitro Characterization of Gut Microbiota-Derived Commensal Strains: Selection of Parabacteroides distasonis Strains Alleviating TNBS-Induced Colitis in Mice. Cells 9: 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.van Muijlwijk GH, van Mierlo G, Jansen P, Vermeulen M, Bleumink-Pluym NMC, Palm NW, van Putten JPM, and de Zoete MR. Identification of Allobaculum mucolyticum as a novel human intestinal mucin degrader. Gut Microbes 13: 1966278, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.van Muijlwijk GH, Rice TA, Flavell RA, Palm NW, and de Zoete MR. Allobaculum mucilyticum sp. nov. and Allobaculum fili sp. nov., isolated from the human intestinal tract. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73: 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zheng C, Zhong Y, Xie J, Wang Z, Zhang W, Pi Y, Zhang W, Liu L, Luo J, and Xu W. Bacteroides acidifaciens and its derived extracellular vesicles improve DSS-induced colitis. Front Microbiol 14: 1304232, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Yanagibashi T, Hosono A, Oyama A, Tsuda M, Suzuki A, Hachimura S, Takahashi Y, Momose Y, Itoh K, Hirayama K, Takahashi K, and Kaminogawa S. IgA production in the large intestine is modulated by a different mechanism than in the small intestine: Bacteroides acidifaciens promotes IgA production in the large intestine by inducing germinal center formation and increasing the number of IgA+ B cells. Immunobiology 218: 645–651, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Dominguez K, Pearah AN, Lindon AK, Worthington LA, Carter RR, John-Lewis Edwards N, Ho TTB, Darch SE, and Randis TM. The impact of butyrate on group B Streptococcus-induced intestinal barrier disruption. Infect Immun 92: e0020024, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Sumitomo T, Nakata M, Higashino M, Terao Y, and Kawabata S. Group A streptococcal cysteine protease cleaves epithelial junctions and contributes to bacterial translocation. J Biol Chem 288: 13317–13324, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Price JD, Schaumburg J, Sandin C, Atkinson JP, Lindahl G, and Kemper C. Induction of a regulatory phenotype in human CD4+ T cells by streptococcal M protein. J Immunol 175: 677–684, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Steck N, Hoffmann M, Sava IG, Kim SC, Hahne H, Tonkonogy SL, Mair K, Krueger D, Pruteanu M, Shanahan F, Vogelmann R, Schemann M, Kuster B, Sartor RB, and Haller D. Enterococcus faecalis metalloprotease compromises epithelial barrier and contributes to intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology 141: 959–971, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Elashiry MM, Elashiry M, Zeitoun R, Elsayed R, Tian F, Saber SE, Elashry SH, Tay FR, and Cutler CW. Enterococcus faecalis Induces Differentiation of Immune-Aberrant Dendritic Cells from Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells. Infect Immun 88: 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Jiang Z, Su W, Wen C, Li W, Zhang Y, Gong T, Du S, Wang X, Lu Z, Jin M, and Wang Y. Effect of Porcine Clostridium perfringens on Intestinal Barrier, Immunity, and Quantitative Analysis of Intestinal Bacterial Communities in Mice. Front Vet Sci 9: 881878, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Liu Z, Mou S, Li L, Chen Q, Yang R, Guo S, Jin Y, Liu L, Li T, Chen H, and Wang X. The Barrier Disruption and Pyroptosis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells Caused by Perfringolysin O (PFO) from Clostridium perfringens. Cells 13: 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Wu HY, Kuo CJ, Chou CH, Ho MW, Chen CL, Hsu TS, Chen YC, Chiang-Ni C, Chen YM, Chiu CH, and Lai CH. Clostridium innocuum, an emerging pathogen that induces lipid raft-mediated cytotoxicity. Virulence 14: 2265048, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Leslie JL, Huang S, Opp JS, Nagy MS, Kobayashi M, Young VB, and Spence JR. Persistence and toxin production by Clostridium difficile within human intestinal organoids result in disruption of epithelial paracellular barrier function. Infect Immun 83: 138–145, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, Imaoka A, Kuwahara T, Momose Y, Cheng G, Yamasaki S, Saito T, Ohba Y, Taniguchi T, Takeda K, Hori S, Ivanov II, Umesaki Y, Itoh K, and Honda K. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science 331: 337–341, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Silverman GJ, Deng J, and Azzouz DF. Sex-dependent Lupus Blautia (Ruminococcus) gnavus strain induction of zonulin-mediated intestinal permeability and autoimmunity. Front Immunol 13: 897971, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Henke MT, Kenny DJ, Cassilly CD, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ, and Clardy J. Ruminococcus gnavus, a member of the human gut microbiome associated with Crohn's disease, produces an inflammatory polysaccharide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116: 12672–12677, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Graziani F, Pujol A, Nicoletti C, Dou S, Maresca M, Giardina T, Fons M, and Perrier J. Ruminococcus gnavus E1 modulates mucin expression and intestinal glycosylation. J Appl Microbiol 120: 1403–1417, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Ahn JR, Lee SH, Kim B, Nam MH, Ahn YK, Park YM, Jeong SM, Park MJ, Song KB, Lee SY, and Hong SJ. Ruminococcus gnavus ameliorates atopic dermatitis by enhancing Treg cell and metabolites in BALB/c mice. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 33: e13678, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Gao J, Lin L, Chen Z, Cai Y, Xiao C, Zhou F, Sun B, and Zhao M. In Vitro Digestion and Fermentation of Three Polysaccharide Fractions from Laminaria japonica and Their Impact on Lipid Metabolism-Associated Human Gut Microbiota. J Agric Food Chem 67: 7496–7505, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Li M, Su J, Wu J, Zhao D, Huang M, Lu Y, Zheng J, and Li H. The Prebiotic Activity of a Novel Polysaccharide Extracted from Huangshui by Fecal Fermentation In Vitro. Foods 12: 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Zhu G, Su H, Johnson CH, Khan SA, Kluger H, and Lu L. Intratumour microbiome associated with the infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and patient survival in cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Cancer 151: 25–34, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Hiippala K, Barreto G, Burrello C, Diaz-Basabe A, Suutarinen M, Kainulainen V, Bowers JR, Lemmer D, Engelthaler DM, Eklund KK, Facciotti F, and Satokari R. Novel Odoribacter splanchnicus Strain and Its Outer Membrane Vesicles Exert Immunoregulatory Effects in vitro. Front Microbiol 11: 575455, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Hajra D, Mukherjee D, Vij R, Rajmani RS, Dadireddy V, Das D, Hussain T, Ganji M, Tatu U, and Chakravortty D. Odoribacter splanchnicus mitigates Salmonella-induced gut inflammation and its associated pathogenesis via its secreted bacteriocin. bioRxiv 2024.2008. 2023.609322, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 203.Lima SF, Gogokhia L, Viladomiu M, Chou L, Putzel G, Jin WB, Pires S, Guo CJ, Gerardin Y, Crawford CV, Jacob V, Scherl E, Brown SE, Hambor J, and Longman RS. Transferable Immunoglobulin A-Coated Odoribacter splanchnicus in Responders to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis Limits Colonic Inflammation. Gastroenterology 162: 166–178, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.D'Hauteville H, Khan S, Maskell DJ, Kussak A, Weintraub A, Mathison J, Ulevitch RJ, Wuscher N, Parsot C, and Sansonetti PJ. Two msbB genes encoding maximal acylation of lipid A are required for invasive Shigella flexneri to mediate inflammatory rupture and destruction of the intestinal epithelium. J Immunol 168: 5240–5251, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Maldonado-Contreras A, Birtley JR, Boll E, Zhao Y, Mumy KL, Toscano J, Ayehunie S, Reinecker HC, Stern LJ, and McCormick BA. Shigella depends on SepA to destabilize the intestinal epithelial integrity via cofilin activation. Gut Microbes 8: 544–560, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Fiorentino M, Levine MM, Sztein MB, and Fasano A. Effect of wild-type Shigella species and attenuated Shigella vaccine candidates on small intestinal barrier function, antigen trafficking, and cytokine release. PLoS One 9: e85211, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Biswas A, Banerjee P, and Biswas T. Priming of CD4+ T cells with porin of Shigella dysenteriae activates the cells toward type 1 polarization. Int Immunol 20: 81–88, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
