Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and common primary brain tumor. Diagnosis is based on imaging and is confirmed through a brain biopsy. Multimodal treatment, including gross total resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is typically required. We report a case of a 79-year-old woman, a former smoker, who presented with a headache and generalized weakness and was found to have multiple brain lesions. The patient was diagnosed with glioblastoma and underwent partial resection. Multiple glioblastomas are a rare presentation and can be multicentric or multifocal. Patients with this presentation typically exhibit symptoms of high intracranial pressure. Glioblastomas have a poor prognosis despite multidisciplinary management. Glioblastoma should be considered a differential diagnosis for patients with multiple brain lesions.
Keywords: butterfly glioma, glioblastoma, multicentric, multidisciplinary management, neurosurgery
Introduction
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and common primary brain tumor, constituting 13.9% of all tumors and 51.5% of all malignant tumors [1]. Patients typically present with nonspecific findings or symptoms of increased intracranial pressure such as vomiting, seizures, headaches, and visual changes. Imaging modalities include computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head [2]. Glioblastomas are most commonly found in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes [3,4]. MRI of the head often shows “butterfly glioma tumors” involving the corpus callosum, temporal, and occipital lobes, characterized by hyperintense T2 brain lesions with surrounding edema [5,6]. Glioblastoma is an adult-type IDH wild-type diffuse astrocytic glioma and is diagnosed on molecular criteria as IDH wild-type based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 report [7]. Multiple glioblastomas are a rare presentation, representing 12% of glioblastoma cases, and can be multicentric or multifocal [8]. We present a case of glioblastoma masquerading as metastasis in a 79-year-old female.
Case presentation
We report the case of a 79-year-old woman, a former smoker, who presented with a headache and generalized weakness for 2 months. She didn't seek medical attention and was not investigated. Four brain lesions were discovered during her routine yearly cerebral aneurysm follow-up MRI (Figures 1, 2).
Figure 1. Preoperative MR head sagittal cut showing several new ring-enhancing lesions within the left temporal (5.6 x 3.5 cm), parietal (1.5 x 1.4 cm), and frontal (2.9 x 2 cm) lobes and the right parietal lobe (1.6 x 1.3 cm) .
Figure 2. Preoperative MR head axial cut showing several new ring-enhancing lesions within the left temporal (5.6 x 3.5 cm), parietal (1.5 x 1.4 cm), and frontal (2.9 x 2 cm) lobes and the right parietal (1.6 x 1.3 cm) lobe.
The patient had no history of seizures. Her medical history included coiling, which means inserting coils into the aneursym through the arteries running from the groin to the head, a right carotid terminus intracranial aneurysm measuring 7 mm, a 2-3 mm left carotid terminus managed conservatively, migraines, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression/anxiety, dyslipidemia, obesity, appendectomy, hysterectomy, cesarean section, previous ductal carcinoma in situ, and fibromyalgia. She had no known medication allergies and denied any history of alcohol or recreational drug use.
The patient was alert and was having generalized weakness as part of managing the incidental brain lesions and her history of ductal carcinoma in situ. It was initially thought she had metastasis, for which a metastatic workup was ordered. There was no history of infectious causes and no recent travel history, so an infectious workup was not sent.
Given that metastasis was high on the differential, the patient was initiated on dexamethasone 2 mg twice daily, pantoprazole, and levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily. Her Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 70.
Investigations
Laboratory work was performed with unremarkable results. Imaging studies, including a CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, MRI of the liver, and bone scan, were conducted. The CT chest and the bone scan were negative for metastasis. The CT abdomen and pelvis showed a hypoenhancing mass in the left lobe of the liver, measuring 2.8 x 1.5 x 2.5 cm, and several borderline portacaval lymph nodes, measuring 8-10 mm in the short axis. An MRI of the liver showed a 3.6 x 2.7 cm lesion within segment 4 with increased T2 signal and peripheral enhancement with no washout and multiple simple renal cysts noted measuring up to 1.2 cm.
Operative report
The patient underwent a left frontotemporal craniotomy for brain tumor resection of one of the six lesions (posterior frontal area). The patient underwent general anesthesia, and lines were connected. The patient was placed in a supine position, and a Mayfield clamp was applied for neuronavigation. A curved skin incision was made deep in the periosteum. Two burr holes were placed near the sinus on the left side, and a craniotome was used to connect them. The bone flap was elevated, the dura was opened, and slight maceration occurred. A corticectomy was performed, and samples were sent for frozen and permanent pathology. Frozen pathology was suggestive of a high-grade glioma. The left frontal lesion was resected, hemostasis was achieved, the dura was sutured with duraplasty, and the bone flap was secured with three cranial fixes. The skin was closed with Vicryl staples.
Pathology
The final pathological diagnosis was glioblastoma IDH1 R123H wild-type, WHO grade 4. Microscopically, the tumor exhibited hypercellularity, a fibrillary structure, pleomorphism, infiltration, and a patternless arrangement, with abundant mitotic activity, endothelial hyperplasia, and necrosis (pseudopalisading). Immunohistochemistry results showed positive glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (present), variable oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2), alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked gene (ATRX) (interpreted as retained-wildtype), IDH1-R123H mutation (absent), p53 (increased expression >10% of lesional cells suggesting mutation), Ki67 (highly variable but focally up to 40%), MLH1/MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 (all somehow variable, interpreted as retained).
Postoperative hospital course
Postoperatively, the patient exhibited no gaze palsy, neglect, or facial asymmetry. She was able to move all four extremities and respond intermittently to commands. Her generalized weakness didn't improve with steroids or surgery. Her neurological exam fluctuated throughout her hospital stay. Her KPS postoperatively was 30. A CT head scan revealed postsurgical changes with pneumocephalus, and an MRI confirmed these postsurgical changes (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Postoperative MR head sagittal cut shows postsurgical changes.
During her hospital stay, she experienced altered levels of consciousness and seizures. Her levetiracetam dose was increased to 1 g twice daily, and lacosamide 50 mg twice daily was added. Both medical and radiation oncology teams assessed her condition and provided a prognosis of three to six months due to her advanced age and multifocal disease. The patient was scheduled for palliative external beam radiotherapy to the whole brain of 20 Gray (Gy)/5 fractions over 5 days. She was diagnosed with hyponatremia and treated with 3% normal saline. She was transferred to hospice care after completing the goals of the care meetings. Three weeks after admission, she was following simple instructions, speaking one to two words, and exhibited right-sided weakness because of the progression of the disease.
Discussion
Multiple glioblastomas are classified based on disease infiltration into the commissural fibers, cerebrospinal fluid, and direct extension [9]. Multicentric glioblastomas are defined as two or more masses at least 2 cm apart. Patients with this presentation typically exhibit symptoms of high intracranial pressure [10]. Poor predictors in multicentric glioblastoma included age more than 60 years old, subtotal resection, multiple lesions, and not receiving adjuvant radiation therapy [11]. No significant differences have been found in methylation or amplification between solitary and multiple glioblastomas [8,12].
Rapid early progression (REP) occurred in nearly half of the diagnosed cases of glioblastoma in general, and no study studied REP in multicentric glioblastoma. REP is defined as an increase in enhancement, vascularity, and new enhancing lesions with or without restricted diffusion. It is a negative predictor that does not correlate with methylation status [13]. It usually presents in the frontal lobe, followed by other lobes, and is typically infiltrative [3,14,15]. There is a similar case to ours; that case report was about a 60-year-old man with multiple brain lesions who was admitted with confusion and started on Mannitol and Tegretol. He was initially treated for positive Schistosoma mansoni test results but was later diagnosed with glioblastoma. His health deteriorated eight months after diagnosis [14]. Other cases of multiple glioblastomas present with sudden loss of consciousness, headache, seizures, and weakness [15]. The differential diagnoses of multiple brain lesions include abscess, infarct, metastasis, contusion, glioblastoma, radiation necrosis, demyelinating disease, and hematoma [16].
Multimodal treatment, including radical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is required to improve survival in multicentric glioblastoma, with a median survival of eight months [8,11,17]. Despite multidisciplinary management, multicentric glioblastomas have a poor prognosis. Poor prognostic factors include high contrast enhancement, hemorrhage, edema, and rapid early progression [6,8]. Temozolomide therapy works on DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase (MGMT) and is correlated with the methylation status of the tumor [17,18].
Conclusions
Glioblastomas have a generally poor prognosis despite multidisciplinary management, and multicentric glioblastoma has an even worse prognosis. When multiple brain lesions are observed, glioblastoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis. To increase survivability, multimodal treatment, including radical resection with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy, is recommended. Multidisciplinary meetings and discussions on the goals of care should be conducted.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the patient for agreeing to publish the case for educational purposes. The Editage editing service was utilized.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Rana Moshref, Abdurrahim Elashaal
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rana Moshref
Drafting of the manuscript: Rana Moshref, Abdurrahim Elashaal
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rana Moshref, Abdurrahim Elashaal
Supervision: Abdurrahim Elashaal
References
- 1.CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021. Price M, Ballard C, Benedetti J, et al. http://Price M, Ballard C, Benedetti J, Neff C, Cioffi G, Waite KA, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Ostrom QT. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021. Neuro Oncol. 2024 Oct 6;26(Supplement_6):vi1-vi85. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae145. PMID: 39371035; PMCID: PMC11456825. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26:0. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glioblastoma: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. McKinnon C, Nandhabalan M, Murray SA, Plaha P. BMJ. 2021;374:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.A population-based description of glioblastoma multiforme in Los Angeles County, 1974-1999. Chakrabarti I, Cockburn M, Cozen W, Wang YP, Preston-Martin S. Cancer. 2005;104:2798–2806. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.The association between race and survival in glioblastoma patients in the US: a retrospective cohort study. Bohn A, Braley A, Rodriguez de la Vega P, Zevallos JC, Barengo NC. PLoS One. 2018;13:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.MRI manifestations correlate with survival of glioblastoma multiforme patients. Li WB, Tang K, Chen Q, Li S, Qiu XG, Li SW, Jiang T. Cancer Biol Med. 2012;9:120–123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3941.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. http://Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, Soffietti R, von Deimling A, Ellison DW. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. PMID: 34185076; PMCID: PMC8328013. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prognosis of patients with multifocal glioblastoma: a case-control study. Patil CG, Yi A, Elramsisy A, et al. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:705–711. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS12147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.The incidence and significance of multiple lesions in glioblastoma. Thomas RP, Xu LW, Lober RM, Li G, Nagpal S. J Neurooncol. 2013;112:91–97. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-1030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Multiple glioblastomas: are they different from their solitary counterparts? Singh G, Mehrotra A, Sardhara J, et al. Asian J Neurosurg. 2015;10:266–271. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.162685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clinical implications of multiple glioblastomas: an analysis of prognostic factors and survival to distinguish from their single counterparts. Shieh LT, Guo HR, Chang YK, Lu NM, Ho SY. http://Shieh LT, Guo HR, Chang YK, Lu NM, Ho SY. Clinical implications of multiple glioblastomas: An analysis of prognostic factors and survival to distinguish from their single counterparts. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Mar;119(3):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PMID: 31515159. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119:728–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karnofsky performance scale and neurological assessment of Neuro-Oncology scale as early predictor in glioma. Gunawan PY, Islam AA, July J, Patellongi I, Nasrum M, Aninditha T. http://Gunawan PY, Islam AA, July J, Patellongi I, Nasrum M, Aninditha T. Karnofsky Performance Scale and Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology Scale as Early Predictor in Glioma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):3387-3392. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.11.3387. PMID: 33247700; PMCID: PMC8033113. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21:3387–3392. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.11.3387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Waqar M, Roncaroli F, Lehrer EJ, et al. Neurooncol Adv. 2022;4:0. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rapid progression of glioblastoma multiforme: a case report. Zhang YY, Ruan LX, Zhang S. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:4803–4806. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Multifocal glioblastoma--two case reports and literature review. Zhang ZX, Chen JX, Shi BZ, et al. Chin Neurosurg J. 2021;7:8. doi: 10.1186/s41016-020-00223-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Differential diagnosis of a ring-enhancing brain lesion in the setting of metastatic cancer and a mycotic aneurysm. Tran D, Rahman Q, Weed M, Chow B. http://Tran D, Rahman Q, Weed M, Chow B. Differential diagnosis of a ring-enhancing brain lesion in the setting of metastatic cancer and a mycotic aneurysm. Radiol Case Rep. 2021 Oct 10;16(12):3850-3854. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.09.041. PMID: 34745401; PMCID: PMC8551469. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16:3850–3854. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Glioblastoma and other primary brain malignancies in adults. A review. Schaff LR, Mellinghoff IK. JAMA. 2023;329:574–587. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Induction of MGMT expression is associated with temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenografts. Kitange GJ, Carlson BL, Schroeder MA, et al. http://Kitange GJ, Carlson BL, Schroeder MA, Grogan PT, Lamont JD, Decker PA, Wu W, James CD, Sarkaria JN. Induction of MGMT expression is associated with temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenografts. Neuro Oncol. 2009 Jun;11(3):281-91. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-090. Epub 2008 Oct 24. PMID: 18952979; PMCID: PMC2718972. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11:281–291. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]