Abstract
Background:
Complex wounds represent a challenge to global health, incurring significant healthcare costs and compromising patients’ quality of life. Recently, research has investigated the potential of adipose tissue–derived stem cells (ASC) for therapeutic stem cells’ immunomodulatory properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sequential applications of ASC in an experimental model of a complex wound.
Methods:
Thirty male Wistar rats were subjected to a complex wound model of enterocutaneous fistula. After 4 weeks, the rats were divided into 3 groups: control, 2 applications of culture medium, and 2 applications of 1 × 106 allogeneic ASC. The animals were euthanized and analyzed 4 weeks after the first application regarding the macroscopic reduction of the wound, histopathologic changes, and gene expression related to wound healing (Cd68, Il1rap, Il10, Mmp3, Mmp9, and Tnf).
Results:
Animals treated with ASC showed a reduction in wound diameter of 68% compared with the control group (P = 0.002) and a reduction of 65% compared with the culture medium group (P = 0.011). The ASC group also showed a more than 100% increase in blood vessel count compared with the control group (P = 0.02). Gene expression analysis showed a decrease in the Mmp9 levels in the ASC group compared with the control group.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated that the treatment with ASC improves the healing of enterocutaneous fistula wounds.
Takeaways
Question: Can adipose tissue–derived stem cell (ASC) application improve the healing of complex wounds?
Findings: In this experimental model, rats were subjected to a complex wound model of enterocutaneous fistula. After 4 weeks, rats were divided into 3 groups: control, 2 applications of culture medium, and 2 applications of allogeneic ASCs. Results showed that animals treated with ASCs presented a reduction in wound diameter, an increase in blood vessel count, and a decrease in the Mmp9 gene expression levels compared with the control group.
Meaning: The treatment with ASCs can improve the healing of complex wounds, as shown in this experimental model of enterocutaneous fistula.
INTRODUCTION
Complex wounds are a specific type of chronic wound that represent a significant challenge to global health today. They are characterized by healing through secondary intention, tissue loss, prolonged treatment duration, association with infection, and the presence of comorbidities.1–3
According to data from 2018 in the United States, they affect 8 million Medicare beneficiaries, compromising patients’ quality of life and generating annual costs of US $97 billion.4 In Europe, the estimated prevalence of complex wounds in the German population is 2%, whereas the annual impact on the United Kingdom’s public healthcare system is £5.0 billion, generating physical, mental, and social repercussions.5,6
Unlike acute wounds, in which tissue repair mechanisms act in an organized manner to resolve the wound, the environment of a complex wound is characterized by several metabolic and immunologic changes.7,8 Some health conditions are associated with the appearance of these injuries, such as age, diabetes, obesity, infection, vascular insufficiency, and mechanical impairment.9–11 The progressive aging of the population and the association of these chronic-degenerative diseases with older individuals makes the scenario more challenging for the health system.12,13
Treating a patient with a complex wound is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary effort. In addition to treating the underlying conditions, it also involves local wound care with the aim of reversing the metabolic and immunologic changes. Recent studies on the application of adipose tissue–derived stem cells (ASCs) have demonstrated their modulatory effects on the inflammatory and immunologic responses, showing potential benefits in diseases marked by immunologic alterations, such as Crohn’s disease, axillary hidradenitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.14–16
The main actions of ASC can be grouped into 6 different groups: immunomodulation, angiogenesis, stimulation of growth and differentiation of local stem cells, chemotaxis, inhibition of apoptosis, and inhibition of fibrosis.17–19 This regulatory action of the immune and inflammatory response is capable of contributing to the treatment of complex wounds, by contributing to the reversal of the metabolic and immunologic changes presented.14,17,20
Considering the importance of treating complex wounds and the potential therapeutic benefits of ASC, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of sequential ASC application in an experimental model of the complex wound, both at the macroscopic levels of wound reduction, as well as histopathologic and gene expression changes.
METHODS
We conducted a study on 30 male Wistar rats 8–12 weeks of age between January and June 2021. The rats weighed between 300 and 350 g and were kept in species-specific cages at a temperature of 24°C, with 12/12-hour day-night cycles and an ad libitum diet. Our project followed the recommendations for laboratory animal handling established by the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation and the ARRIVE guidelines.21 The animal research ethics committee of our institution approved the study (1278/2019).
Harvesting and Production of ASCs
Three Wistar rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine hydrochloride (Pfizer) at a dose of 100 mg/kg and xylazine hydrochloride (Syntec, Brazil) at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Adipose tissue was harvested from the abdominal region, mechanically fragmented, and enzymatically digested at 37°C using collagenase IA 0.1% dissolved in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Sigma Aldrich, Germany). The material was filtered and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes, and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was isolated in a culture medium (CM) comprised of 80% DMEM, 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma Aldrich, Germany), and antibiotics (penicillin, Sigma Aldrich, Germany; streptomycin, Biofarm, Brazil; amphotericin B, Cristalia, Brazil). The cells were then incubated at 37°C. Upon reaching 80% confluence, the cells were released using trypsin (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Sigma Aldrich, Germany). These cells were amplified until the fourth passage, at which they were used.
The presence of ASCs was confirmed, and the immunophenotyping was determined through flow cytometry assays.22 The confirmation of viable ASCs is in accordance with the criteria established by the International Society for Cellular Therapy.23
Induction of Complex Wound: Enterocutaneous Fistula
Twenty-seven animals were submitted to the surgical procedure. After anesthetization with ketamine hydrochloride (Pfizer) at a dose of 100 mg/kg and xylazine hydrochloride (Syntec, Brazil) at a dose of 10 mg/kg, a complex wound was created. The procedure consisted of executing a previously established model of enterocutaneous fistula (ECF).24 A midline laparotomy was performed to identify and exteriorize the cecum through a counter incision. The intestinal loop was then opened and attached to the abdominal wall and skin.
After a 4-week recovery period, the animals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, with each group consisting of 9 animals:
Control: no treatment was administered.
CM: animals received a perilesional subdermal injection of 0.5 mL of 80% DMEM and 20% FBS CM. The same procedure was repeated after 1 week.
ASC: animals received a perilesional subdermal injection of 1 × 106 ASCs in 0.5 mL of CM solution. The same procedure was repeated after 1 week, according to the previous results.22
Four weeks after the first intervention, the effects of the treatment were evaluated. The experimental design is depicted in Figure 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of experimental design. The animals were submitted to the procedure for making a complex wound (ECF) and, after 4 weeks, randomized between the control, CM, and ASC groups, when the animals were submitted to the first intervention. After 1 week, they received a new application of CM or stem cell. Finally, 3 weeks later, the animals were euthanized, and the results were analyzed.
Macroscopic Analysis
The animals were examined weekly to check their general condition. Four weeks after the intervention, the diameter of the wound was measured with the animals in dorsal decubitus with a millimeter ruler at the largest diameter, following specific recommendations for this type of wound.25
Histopathologic Analysis
Wound samples were collected and analyzed using optical microscopy (Nikon Eclipse E600, Tokyo, Japan). The following variables were evaluated: inflammatory cell count (macrophages and polymorphonuclear cells) and blood vessel count (arterioles), in addition to the analysis of fibrosis and inflammation.
The quantification of inflammatory cells and blood vessels for vascular density was analyzed by directly counting these structures at 40× magnification in 10 random fields per slide.
The analysis of fibrosis and inflammation was also performed at 40× magnification in 10 fields per slide. The scenarios observed on the slides were subjectively classified according to a score from 0 to 5, where 0 represents the best possible scenario, with little or no fibrosis and abnormal infiltration of inflammatory cells. Score 5 presents the worst scenario, with high levels of fibrosis and abnormal infiltration of inflammatory cells.
Gene Expression Analysis
The gene expression analysis was performed on a selection of genes associated with wound healing and inflammation, including Cd68, Il10, Il1rap, Mmp3, Mmp9, and Tnf.26–29
Tissues stabilized in RNAlater (30 mg) were used for total RNA extraction using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). The tissues were disrupted using the TissueLyser LT apparatus (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). To avoid DNA contamination during the extraction, TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used in place of the Buffer RLT reagent from the RNeasy Mini Kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One milliliter of TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and stainless-steel beads were added to the microcentrifuge tubes. Tissue disruption was carried out for 5 minutes at 50 Hz. After removing the beads, 0.2 mL of chloroform was added. After homogenization in the vortex for 15 seconds, samples were incubated for 3 minutes at room temperature followed by centrifugation at 12.000g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a 1.5 mL tube, and a 1:1 volume of 70% ethanol was added, then homogenized by vigorous pipetting. A volume of 0.7 mL of prepared sample, including any type of precipitate, was transferred to an RNeasy kit column. From this stage on, extraction was carried out following the kit manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA purity (evaluated through the ratios 260:280 and 260:230) and integrity were determined by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC) and gel electrophoresis, respectively. RNA samples were stored at −80°C until use.
The quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed using 2000 ng of total RNA, which was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as recommended by the manufacturer. The expression levels of Cd68 (Rn01495634_g1), Il10 (Rn01483988_g1), Il1rap (Rn01404183_m1), Mmp3 (Rn01495634_g1), Mmp9 (Rn00579162_m1), and Tnf (Rn01525859_g1) genes were quantified using TaqMan methodology (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in the StepOnePlus real-time polymerase chain reaction system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), using the default cycling conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Each sample was run in duplicate, and Gapdh (Rn01775763_g1) was used as the endogenous control. Fold change (FC) was calculated using the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCT).30 The control group was used as the reference.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA (v. 14, StataCorp, College Station, TX), with a significance level of 5% and a study power of 80%. The Shapiro–Wilk test was initially applied to assess data normality and guide the choice between parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean and SD. The analysis of variance test was used for parametric variables, whereas the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for nonparametric variables to compare groups. If significance was observed, a post hoc Bonferroni test was performed. Regarding gene expression analysis, we used the parametric test analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc for comparison among groups, with a significance level of 5% using SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).
RESULTS
Out of the 27 animals that underwent the complex wound surgical procedure, 26 survived until the end of the evaluation period. Specifically, 8 rats in the control group and 9 rats each in both the CM and ASC groups were included in the study. One animal died before the randomization stage and was excluded from the study.
Flow Cytometry
The analysis showed that CD31 and CD45 markers showed a negative result, whereas the CD29, CD73, CD90, and CD105 markers showed a positive result, confirming the isolation of viable ASCs.
Macroscopic Assessment
Wound measurements (Fig. 2) indicated that the diameter in the ASC group (3.3 ± 0.6 mm) decreased by 68.3% compared with the control group (10.4 ± 2. 3 mm, P = 0.002) and by 65.3% compared with the CM group (9.5 ± 4.1 mm, P = 0.011). No significant differences were observed between the control and CM groups.
Fig. 2.
Comparison of ECF wound diameter (mm) among the control, CM, and ASC groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P = 0.002, **P = 0.011. The Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn posttest.
Histopathologic Analysis
The number of blood vessels in both the ASC and CM groups increased by more than 100% compared with the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively), as illustrated in Figure 3 and Table 1.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of blood vessel count among the control, CM, and ASC groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P = 0.02, **P < 0.001. The Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn posttest.
Table 1.
Number of Blood Vessels and Inflammatory Cells in Control, CM, and ASC Groups
| Control | CM | ASC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood vessels | 12.4 ± 4.3 | 33.1 ± 5.4* | 29.1 ± 8.3** |
| Inflammatory cells | 453.4 ± 170.2 | 618.4 ± 253.1 | 508.4 ± 294.7 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Versus control, P < 0.001.
Versus control, P = 0.02. The Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn posttest.
Regarding inflammation, there were no significant differences in the number of inflammatory cells (Table 1) or the inflammation score (Table 2) among the groups.
Table 2.
Comparison of Inflammation and Fibrosis Scores Among the Control, CM, and ASC Groups
| Control | CM | ASC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammation score | 3.75 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.7 |
| Fibrosis score | 4.25 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.7 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn posttest.
The evaluation of the fibrosis score of the wound tissue is shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences among the studied groups.
Figure 4 presents the histopathologic sections from the 3 groups, showing blood vessels, inflammatory cells, and tissue fibrosis.
Fig. 4.
Representative histopathologic sections of ECF wound samples stained with hematoxylin/eosin of control group (A and B), CM group (C and D), and ASC group (E and F). Magnification: 200× (A, C, and E) and 400× (B, D, and F).
Gene Expression Analysis
For gene expression analyses, the expression levels of each gene of interest were compared among the CM (n = 4), ASC (n = 9), and control (n = 6) groups, using the control group as the reference. We found significant differences in Cd68 (P = 0.012) and Mmp9 (P = 0.009) gene expression levels among groups (Table 3). Tukey post hoc showed that the Cd68 gene expression level was 0.23-fold in the CM group in relation to the control group (P = 0.009). For the Mmp9 gene, we demonstrated an FC of 0.15 in the CM group when compared with the control group (P = 0.007) and an FC of 0.19 in the ASC group in relation to the control group (P = 0.043), as shown in Figure 5.
Table 3.
Comparison of the Gene Expression Between Control (N = 4), CM (N = 9), and ASC (N = 6) Groups, Using the Control Group as a Reference
| Control | CM | ASC | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd68 | 1.19 ± 0.78 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.65 | 5.9 | 0.012* |
| Il10 | 1.19 ± 0.92 | 1.59 ± 1.79 | 4.04 ± 4.03 | 1.8 | 0.199 |
| Il1rap | 1.04 ± 0.33 | 0.75 ± 0.36 | 1.27 ± 0.66 | 2.7 | 0.099 |
| Mmp3 | 1.43 ± 1.31 | 2.59 ± 3.32 | 6.09 ± 7.59 | 1.0 | 0.379 |
| Mmp9 | 1.66 ± 1.50 | 0.15 ± 0.23 | 0.19 ± 0.18 | 6.5 | 0.009* |
| Tnf | 1.02 ± 0.23 | 1.68 ± 1.01 | 2.11 ± 0.96 | 1.9 | 0.184 |
Data are expressed as FC mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance test.
P < 0.05.
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the expression levels of Cd68 (A), Mmp9 (B), Il10 (C), Il1rap (D), Mmp3 (E), and Tnf genes (F) among control (n = 4), CM (n = 9), and ASC (n = 6) groups. FC was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method, with the control group used as reference. *P = 0.009, **P = 0.007, ***P = 0.043. A one-way analysis of variance test with the Tukey posttest was performed.
DISCUSSION
Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying chronic wound healing is constantly improving, thanks in large part to the development and refinement of wound models and diagnostic tools. The complex wound model used in this study is consistent with what has been found in clinical practice, particularly those involving wounds that remain unresolved for more than 30 days. Additionally, all ECFs, regardless of their cause, are marked by elevated levels of inflammatory markers.31–33 This sustained inflammatory activity in ECFs impedes tissue healing, highlighting the need for alternatives that target and modulate this inflammatory mechanism.
The findings of this study were consistent with previous research in the literature on the application of stem cells derived from adipose tissue.34–41 It is important to highlight that, despite all demonstrating positive and well-tolerated results, the methods used were heterogeneous. The studies differ in the origin of stem cells, the number of cells administered, the time frame of the analysis, the method of application, and whether the cells were autologous or allogeneic. These variations in protocols highlight the need for further research to standardize treatment approaches. Regarding the translational aspects of applying this protocol in human subjects, immunologic incompatibility should not be a concern, as the objective is to use autologous ASC in the recipients. In contrast, allogeneic cells may trigger high inflammatory and immune responses. Although elevated inflammation was not observed in this study, it is essential to address this potential issue when translating the protocol to human subjects to mitigate the risk of host-versus-graft disease.
Histopathologic evaluations in the present study revealed an increase in vascular density following ASC infiltration and no notable change in the quantities of inflammatory cells, despite a significant reduction in wound diameter. Wound healing is known to be a continuous process, often divided into stages in a didactic manner, according to the main findings of the moment.26 The initial inflammatory phase is characterized by the intense migration of neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes, which produce various cytokines and growth factors.26,27 Subsequently, the proliferative phase is characterized by the production of extracellular matrix by fibroblasts, which move through the scar tissue through the degradation of the previous matrix via production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). This phase also sees intense angiogenesis and epithelialization. Finally, during the remodeling phase, the number of inflammatory cells decreases, and tissue tensile strength progressively increases. In chronic wounds, where these processes are not well coordinated, elevated levels of TNF-∂, IL-1, IL-6, and MMPs are commonly observed.26 Thus, the timing of tissue sample collection in this study suggests a transition toward the resolution of the inflammatory phase, as evidenced by stable inflammatory cell counts, increased vascular density, and reduced wound diameter.
As the wound progresses toward resolution, the activation state of macrophages and their function undergo significant changes. One key marker of this phenotypic change is the glycoprotein Cd68.42,43 Although the number of inflammatory cells did not differ significantly among the studied groups, gene expression analysis indicated a trend in the reduction of Cd68 expression in tissue samples subjected to ASC application, which might show a change in the healing process toward wound resolution.
MMPs play a crucial role in the degradation of extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen, proteoglycans, and elastin, contributing to tissue remodeling.27 Although they are involved in several diseases, including cancer, arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sepsis, MMPs also have important functions in physiological processes such as wound healing, angiogenesis, and inflammatory regulation. In this study, the reduction in Mmp9 expression in the ASC group in relation to the control group indicates the capacity of these cells to modulate the immune response and is compatible with the intense reduction in the size of the wound, moving toward resolution. Different types of MMPs show preferences for specific substrates, and a reduction in the activity of 1 MMP can often trigger a compensatory increase in the activity of others, maintaining the overall balance of their effects.28
IL-10 is a cytokine that plays a crucial role in regulating the immune response and has anti-inflammatory properties. It inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Th1 cells, macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and other antigen-presenting cells.44 Our study indicated an upward trend in IL-10 in the group treated with ASCs, which, although not statistically significant, might suggest one of the possible mechanisms related to the immunomodulatory effect of ASCs.29
TNF stimulates vasodilation, edema formation, and adhesion of leukocytes to the epithelium; regulates blood clotting; contributes to oxidative stress at sites of inflammation; and, indirectly, induces fever.45 Additionally, TNF induces angiogenesis and regulates tissue remodeling through its stimulatory action on MMPs. The evaluation of Tnf gene expression in this study showed no change among groups, despite the increase in blood vessels and the reduction of the wound in the ASC group.
Finally, IL-1 plays an important role in healing, being involved in the innate inflammatory response and in the activation of immune system cells during this process.46 IL-1, found constitutively in healthy cells, is released under conditions of cell death, stimulating the production of chemokines and the infiltration of cells such as neutrophils and monocytes. Our study found no difference among groups in Il1rap expression, indicating that wound resolution advanced despite remaining similar, suggesting another mechanism of action.
In the same way that this study indicated an increase in the number of blood vessels in the group subjected to infiltration of CM only, in addition to a decrease in the expression of Mmp9, previous studies have demonstrated some effect on tissue repair mechanisms. Guo et al47 demonstrated the highest concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor in an ex vivo experimental skin model in samples subjected to DMEM applications when compared with those treated with ASC or CM–ASC application. Jiang et al,48 using a murine model of scleroderma, found greater thickness of the dermis and collagen fraction in the skin of animals treated with phosphate-buffered saline, when compared with fat, fat enriched with SVF, and only SVF.
Some limitations of the study should be acknowledged. The evaluation of the ASC effects could be expanded to a broader range of gene expression targets, including collagen and growth factors, to capture the complexity of the immunologic response involving various cellular and molecular agents. The changes observed in some markers in the CM group are likely attributed to the composition of DMEM, combined with fetal bovine serum, which may have stimulated the healing process through the presence of several proteins and growth factors. Finally, caution is required when translating experimental findings to humans, considering that there are biological differences that can impact the outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, stem cells derived from adipose tissue were evaluated in the treatment of complex wounds in a murine experimental model. The results demonstrated that, after the application of these cells, there was a reduction in the diameter of the wounds, an increase in vascular density, and alterations in Mmp9 expression levels, revealing clinical, histopathologic, and biomolecular concordances in this sample. These findings indicate that the application of stem cells derived from adipose tissue can favor wound resolution through the formation of new blood vessels and modulation of the inflammatory response, making it a potential therapeutic strategy in complex wounds.
DISCLOSURE
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Footnotes
Published online 25 April 2025.
Presented at the 58th Brazilian Congress of Plastic Surgery, 2022, Goiânia, GO, Brazil; 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, 2023, Chicago, IL, USA.
Disclosure statements are at the end of this article, following the correspondence information.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ferreira MC, Tuma P, Carvalho VF, et al. Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2006;61:571–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lindholm C, Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int Wound J. 2016;13:5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Norman G, Shi C, Westby MJ, et al. Bacteria and bioburden and healing in complex wounds: a prognostic systematic review. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29:466–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nussbaum SR, Carter MJ, Fife CE, et al. An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and Medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds. Value Health. 2018;21:27–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, et al. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heyer K, Herberger K, Protz K, et al. Epidemiology of chronic wounds in Germany: analysis of statutory health insurance data. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24:434–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg. 1998;176:26S–38S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Whitney JD. Overview: acute and chronic wounds. Nurs Clin North Am. 2005;40:191–205, v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Beyene RT, Derryberry SL, Barbul A. The effect of comorbidities on wound healing. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100:695–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bowers S, Franco E. Chronic wounds: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101:159–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wilkinson HN, Hardman MJ. Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open Biol. 2020;10:200223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, et al. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:427–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Census. Older people projected to outnumber children for first time in U.S. history. Census. March 13, 2018. Available at https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html. Accessed June 17, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nourian Dehkordi A, Mirahmadi Babaheydari F, Chehelgerdi M, et al. Skin tissue engineering: wound healing based on stem-cell-based therapeutic strategies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dalal J, Gandy K, Domen J. Role of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in Crohn’s disease. Pediatr Res. 2012;71:445–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duscher D, Barrera J, Wong VW, et al. Stem cells in wound healing: the future of regenerative medicine? A mini-review. Gerontology. 2016;62:216–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Singer NG, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:457–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Borena BM, Martens A, Broeckx SY, et al. Regenerative skin wound healing in mammals: state-of-the-art on growth factor and stem cell based treatments. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:1–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park U, Kim K. Multiple growth factor delivery for skin tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2017;22:659–670. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Butler KL, Goverman J, Ma H, et al. Stem cells and burns: review and therapeutic implications. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31:874–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:3617–3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pagotto VPF, Camargo CP, Cáceres PV, et al. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells as a therapeutic strategy for enterocutaneous fistula: an experimental model study. Acta Cir Bras. 2023;38:e384523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Camargo CP, Kubrusly MS, Lee AD, et al. Simplified model of enterocutaneous fistula in the rat. Acta Sci Gastron Disord. 2022;5:06–10. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, et al. ; American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Committee. AGA technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1508–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Patel S, Maheshwari A, Chandra A. Biomarkers for wound healing and their evaluation. J Wound Care. 2016;25:46–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mazini L, Rochette L, Admou B, et al. Hopes and limits of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fischer T, Riedl R. Challenges with matrix metalloproteinase inhibition and future drug discovery avenues. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2021;16:75–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cardoso A, Gil Castro A, Martins AC, et al. The dynamics of interleukin-10-afforded protection during dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cho JH. The genetics and immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:458–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rahbour G, Hart AL, Al-Hassi HO, et al. Prospective study of immunological factors in non-inflammatory bowel disease enterocutaneous fistulas. BMC Surg. 2011;11:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lloyd DAJ, Gabe SM, Windsor ACJ. Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1045–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garcia-Olmo D, Herreros D, Pascual I, et al. Expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex perianal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de la Portilla F, Alba F, García-Olmo D, et al. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) for the treatment of complex perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: results from a multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:313–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park KJ, Ryoo S‐B, Kim JS, et al. Allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: a pilot clinical trial. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:468–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ryska O, Serclova Z, Mestak O, et al. Local application of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells supports the healing of fistula: prospective randomised study on rat model of fistulising Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:543–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, et al. ; ADMIRE CD Study Group Collaborators. Long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1334–1342.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dozois EJ, Lightner AL, Mathis KL, et al. Early results of a phase I trial using an adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-coated fistula plug for the treatment of transsphincteric cryptoglandular fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:615–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Carvello M, Lightner A, Yamamoto T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for perianal Crohn’s disease. Cells. 2019;8:764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Barnhoorn MC, Wasser MNJM, Roelofs H, et al. Long-term evaluation of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for Crohn’s disease perianal fistulas. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:64–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Delavary BM, van der Veer WM, van Egmond M, et al. Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology. 2011;216:753–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chistiakov DA, Killingsworth MC, Myasoedova VA, et al. CD68/macrosialin: not just a histochemical marker. Lab Invest. 2017;97:4–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saraiva M, Vieira P, O’Garra A. Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10. J Exp Med. 2020;217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zelová H, Hošek J. TNF-α signalling and inflammation: interactions between old acquaintances. Inflamm Res. 2013;62:641–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dinarello CA. Overview of the IL-1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol Rev. 2018;281:8–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guo X, Schaudinn C, Blume-Peytavi U, et al. Effects of adipose-derived stem cells and their conditioned medium in a human ex vivo wound model. Cells. 2022;11:1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jiang W, Wang J, Lin J, et al. Adipose-derived stem cell–enriched lipotransfer reverses skin sclerosis by suppressing dermal inflammation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150:578–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





