Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1986 Feb;112(2):359–383. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.2.359

The Evolution of Self-Regulated Transposition of Transposable Elements

B Charlesworth 1,2, C H Langley 1,2
PMCID: PMC1202706  PMID: 3000868

Abstract

This paper examines the conditions under which self-regulated rates of transposition can evolve in populations of transposable elements infecting sexually reproducing hosts. Models of the evolution of both cis-acting regulation (transposition immunity) and trans-acting regulation (transposition repression) are analyzed. The potential selective advantage to regulation is assumed to be derived from the deleterious effects of mutations associated with the insertion of newly replicated elements. It is shown that both types of regulation can easily evolve in hosts with low rates of genetic recombination per generation, such as bacteria or bacterial plasmids. Conditions are much more restrictive in organisms with relatively free recombination. In haploids, the main selective force promoting regulation is the induction of lethal or sterile mutations by transposition; in diploids, a sufficiently high frequency of dominant lethal or sterile mutations associated with transpositions is required. Data from Drosophila and maize suggest that this requirement can sometimes be met. Coupling of regulatory effects across different families of elements would also aid the evolution of regulation. The selective advantages of restricting transposition to the germ line and of excising elements from somatic cells are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beermann S., Meyer G. F. Chromatin rings as products of chromatin diminution in Cyclops. Chromosoma. 1980;77(3):277–283. doi: 10.1007/BF00286053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birky C. W., Jr, Maruyama T., Fuerst P. An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):513–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop R., Sherratt D. Transposon Tn1 intra-molecular transposition. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;196(1):117–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00334102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookfield J. F. Interspersed repetitive DNA sequences are unlikely to be parasitic. J Theor Biol. 1982 Jan 21;94(2):281–299. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90313-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter A. T., Baker B. S. On the Control of the Distribution of Meiotic Exchange in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1982 May;101(1):81–89. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark A. G. Natural selection with nuclear and cytoplasmic transmission. I. A deterministic model. Genetics. 1984 Aug;107(4):679–701. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.4.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doolittle W. F., Kirkwood T. B., Dempster M. A. Selfish DNAs with self-restraint. Nature. 1984 Feb 9;307(5951):501–502. doi: 10.1038/307501b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Engels W. R. The P family of transposable elements in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1983;17:315–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.001531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ginzburg L. R., Bingham P. M., Yoo S. On the theory of speciation induced by transposable elements. Genetics. 1984 Jun;107(2):331–341. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.2.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hickey D. A. Selfish DNA: a sexually-transmitted nuclear parasite. Genetics. 1982 Jul-Aug;101(3-4):519–531. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.3-4.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kleckner N. Transposable elements in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 1981;15:341–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Langley C. H., Brookfield J. F., Kaplan N. Transposable elements in mendelian populations. I. A theory. Genetics. 1983 Jul;104(3):457–471. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MCCLINTOCK B. Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:197–216. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MORTON N. E. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet. 1955 Sep;7(3):277–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Montgomery E. A., Langley C. H. Transposable Elements in Mendelian Populations. II. Distribution of Three COPIA-like Elements in a Natural Population of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1983 Jul;104(3):473–483. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.3.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ohta T., Kimura M. Some calculations on the amount of selfish DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1129–1132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohta T. Population genetics of selfish DNA. Nature. 1981 Aug 13;292(5824):648–649. doi: 10.1038/292648a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Robinson M. K., Bennett P. M., Richmond M. H. Inhibition of TnA translocation by TnA. J Bacteriol. 1977 Jan;129(1):407–414. doi: 10.1128/jb.129.1.407-414.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roth G. E., Moritz K. B. Restriction enzyme analysis of the germ line limited DNA of Ascaris suum. Chromosoma. 1981;83(2):169–190. doi: 10.1007/BF00286787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubin G. M., Kidwell M. G., Bingham P. M. The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: the nature of induced mutations. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):987–994. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90462-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simons R. W., Kleckner N. Translational control of IS10 transposition. Cell. 1983 Sep;34(2):683–691. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90401-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Slatkin M. Genetic differentiation of transposable elements under mutation and unbiased gene conversion. Genetics. 1985 May;110(1):145–158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.1.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Syvanen M. The evolutionary implications of mobile genetic elements. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:271–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.001415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yokoyama R. W., Yao M. C. Elimination of DNA sequences during macronuclear differentiation in Tetrahymena thermophila, as detected by in situ hybridization. Chromosoma. 1982;85(1):11–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00344591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES