Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1986 Aug;113(4):1077–1091. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.4.1077

Variability of Evolutionary Rates of DNA

John H Gillespie 1
PMCID: PMC1202912  PMID: 3744027

Abstract

A statistical analysis of DNA sequences from four nuclear loci and five mitochondrial loci from different orders of mammals is described. A major aim of the study is to describe the variation in the rate of molecular evolution of proteins and DNA. A measure of rate variability is the statistic R, the ratio of the variance in the number of substitutions to the mean number. For proteins, R is found to be in the range 0.16 < R < 35.55, thus extending in both directions the values seen in previous studies. An analysis of codons shows that there is a highly significant excess of double substitutions in the first and second positions, but not in the second and third or first and third positions. The analysis of the dynamics of nucleotide evolution showed that the ergodic Markov chain models that are the basis of most published formulas for correcting for multiple substitutions are incompatible with the data. A bootstrap procedure was used to show that the evolution of the individual nucleotides, even the third positions, show the same variation in rates as seen in the proteins. It is argued that protein and silent DNA evolution are uncoupled, with the evolution at both levels showing patterns that are better explained by the action of natural selection than by neutrality. This conclusion is based primarily on a comparison of the nuclear and mitochondrial results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (931.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown W. M., Prager E. M., Wang A., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol. 1982;18(4):225–239. doi: 10.1007/BF01734101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gillespie J. H. Natural selection and the molecular clock. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Mar;3(2):138–155. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmquist R., Goodman M., Conroy T., Czelusniak J. The spatial distribution of fixed mutations within genes coding for proteins. J Mol Evol. 1983;19(6):437–448. doi: 10.1007/BF02102319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lanave C., Preparata G., Saccone C., Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol. 1984;20(1):86–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02101990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Langley C. H., Fitch W. M. An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol. 1974;3(3):161–177. doi: 10.1007/BF01797451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miyata T., Hayashida H., Kikuno R., Hasegawa M., Kobayashi M., Koike K. Molecular clock of silent substitution: at least six-fold preponderance of silent changes in mitochondrial genes over those in nuclear genes. J Mol Evol. 1982;19(1):28–35. doi: 10.1007/BF02100221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ota T., Kimura M. On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons. J Mol Evol. 1971;1(1):18–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01659391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson A. C., Carlson S. S., White T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:573–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES