Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 Jan;115(1):207–213. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.207

Simulating Evolution by Gene Duplication

Tomoko Ohta 1
PMCID: PMC1203057  PMID: 3557113

Abstract

By considering the recent finding that unequal crossing over and other molecular interactions are contributing to the evolution of multigene families, a model of the origin of repetitive genes was studied by Monte Carlo simulations. Starting from a single gene copy, how genetic systems evolve was examined under unequal crossing over, random drift and natural selection. Both beneficial and deteriorating mutations were incorporated, and the latter were assumed to occur ten times more frequently than the former. Positive natural selection favors those chromosomes with more beneficial mutations in redundant copies than others in the population, but accumulation of deteriorating mutations (pseudogenes) have no effect on fitness so long as there remains a functional gene. The results imply the following: (1) Positive natural selection is needed in order to acquire gene families with new functions. Without it, too many pseudogenes accumulate before attaining a functional gene family. (2) There is a large fluctuation in the outcome even if parameters are the same. (3) When unequal crossing over occurs more frequently, the system evolves more rapidly. It was also shown, under realistic values of parameters, that the genetic load for acquiring a new gene is not as large as J. B. S. Haldane suggested, but not so small as in a model in which a system for selection started from already redundant genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (693.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gilbert W. Why genes in pieces? Nature. 1978 Feb 9;271(5645):501–501. doi: 10.1038/271501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hastie N. D., Held W. A., Toole J. J. Multiple genes coding for the androgen-regulated major urinary proteins of the mouse. Cell. 1979 Jun;17(2):449–457. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90171-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hinds K. R., Litman G. W. Major reorganization of immunoglobulin VH segmental elements during vertebrate evolution. Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):546–549. doi: 10.1038/320546a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Loomis W. F., Gilpin M. E. Multigene families and vestigial sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(7):2143–2147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.7.2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Muller H. J. BAR DUPLICATION. Science. 1936 May 29;83(2161):528–530. doi: 10.1126/science.83.2161.528-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohta T. On the evolution of multigene families. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):216–240. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES