Abstract
Studies of Escherichia coli under competition for lactose in chemostat cultures have been used to determine the selective effects of variation in the level of the β-galactoside permease and the β-galactosidase enzyme. The results determine the adaptive topography of these gene products relative to growth in limiting lactose and enable predictions concerning the selective effects of genetic variants found in natural populations. In the terms of metabolic control theory, the β-galactosidase enzyme at wild-type-induced levels has a small control coefficient with respect to fitness (C = 0.018), and hence genetic variants resulting in minor changes in enzyme activity have disproportionately small effects on fitness. However, the apparent control coefficient of the β-galactoside permease at wild-type-induced levels is large (C = 0.551), and hence even minor changes in activity affect fitness. Therefore, we predict that genetic polymorphisms in the lacZ gene are subject to less effective selection in natural populations than are those in the lacY gene. The β-galactoside permease is also less efficient than might be expected, and possible forces resulting in selection for an intermediate optimum level of permease activity are considered. The selective forces that maintain the lactose operon in a regulated state in natural populations are also discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (698.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andrews K. J., Hegeman G. D. Selective disadvantage of non-functional protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. J Mol Evol. 1976 Dec 30;8(4):317–328. doi: 10.1007/BF01739257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eanes W. F., Hey J. IN VIVO Function of Rare G6pd Variants from Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1986 Jul;113(3):679–693. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kacser H., Burns J. A. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973;27:65–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novick A., Weiner M. ENZYME INDUCTION AS AN ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 Jul 15;43(7):553–566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.7.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salter M., Knowles R. G., Pogson C. I. Quantification of the importance of individual steps in the control of aromatic amino acid metabolism. Biochem J. 1986 Mar 15;234(3):635–647. doi: 10.1042/bj2340635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson D. M., Putzrath R. M., Wilson T. H. Inhibition of growth of Escherichia coli by lactose and other galactosides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Dec 7;649(2):377–384. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90427-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Delden W., Boerema A. C., Kamping A. The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection in different environments. Genetics. 1978 Sep;90(1):161–191. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]