Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 May;116(1):169–179. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.169

On the Overdispersed Molecular Clock

Naoyuki Takahata 1
PMCID: PMC1203115  PMID: 3596230

Abstract

Rates of molecular evolution at some loci are more irregular than described by simple Poisson processes. Three situations under which molecular evolution would not follow simple Poisson processes are reevaluated from the viewpoint of the neutrality hypothesis: (i) concomitant or multiple substitutions in a gene, (ii) fluctuating substitution rates in time caused by coupled effects of deleterious mutations and bottlenecks, and (iii) changes in the degree of selective constraints against a gene (neutral space) caused by successive substitutions. The common underlying assumption that these causes are lineage nonspecific excludes the case where mutation rates themselves change systematically among lineages or taxonomic groups, and severely limits the extent of variation in the number of substitutions among lineages. Even under this stringent condition, however, the third hypothesis, the fluctuating neutral space model, can generate fairly large variation. This is described by a time-dependent renewal process, which does not exhibit any episodic nature of molecular evolution. It is argued that the observed elevated variances in the number of nucleotide or amino acid substitutions do not immediately call for positive Darwinian selection in molecular evolution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blundell T. L., Cutfield J. F., Cutfield S. M., Dodson E. J., Dodson G. G., Hodgkin D. C., Mercola D. A., Vijayan M. Atomic positions in rhombohedral 2-zinc insulin crystals. Nature. 1971 Jun 25;231(5304):506–511. doi: 10.1038/231506a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blundell T. L., Wood S. P. Is the evolution of insulin Darwinian or due to selectively neutral mutation? Nature. 1975 Sep 18;257(5523):197–203. doi: 10.1038/257197a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fitch W. M., Margoliash E. The construction of phylogenetic trees. II. How well do they reflect past history? Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1968 Jun;21(1):217–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fitch W. M., Markowitz E. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem Genet. 1970 Oct;4(5):579–593. doi: 10.1007/BF00486096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillespie J. H., Langley C. H. Are evolutionary rates really variable? J Mol Evol. 1979 Jun 8;13(1):27–34. doi: 10.1007/BF01732751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillespie J. H. Natural selection and the molecular clock. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Mar;3(2):138–155. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillespie J. H. The molecular clock may be an episodic clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):8009–8013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.8009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. The rate of molecular evolution considered from the standpoint of population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1181–1188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. King J. L., Jukes T. H. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):788–798. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3881.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koop B. F., Goodman M., Xu P., Chan K., Slightom J. L. Primate eta-globin DNA sequences and man's place among the great apes. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):234–238. doi: 10.1038/319234a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ota T., Kimura M. On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons. J Mol Evol. 1971;1(1):18–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01659391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ota T. Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature. 1974 Nov 29;252(5482):351–354. doi: 10.1038/252351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tsukihara T., Fukuyama K., Wakabayashi S., Wada K., Matsubara H., Kerscher L., Oesterhelt D. Preliminary X-ray diffraction studies on a ferredoxin from the thermophilic archaebacterium, Thermoplasma acidophilum. J Mol Biol. 1985 Nov 20;186(2):481–482. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90122-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uzzell T., Corbin K. W. Fitting discrete probability distributions to evolutionary events. Science. 1971 Jun 11;172(3988):1089–1096. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3988.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson A. C., Carlson S. S., White T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:573–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu C. I., Li W. H. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1741–1745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. YANOFSKY C., HORN V., THORPE D. PROTEIN STRUCTURE RELATIONSHIPS REVEALED BY MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS. Science. 1964 Dec 18;146(3651):1593–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3651.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES