Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 Sep;117(1):139–147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.139

Restriction Site Variation in the Zea Chloroplast Genome

J Doebley 1, W Renfroe 1, A Blanton 1
PMCID: PMC1203182  PMID: 17246395

Abstract

Nineteen accessions selected from the four species and three subspecies of the genus Zea and one accession from the related genus Tripsacum were surveyed for variation with 21 restriction endonucleases. In all, 580 restriction sites were assayed in each chloroplast (cp)DNA, this representing 2.2% of the genome. Twenty-four of the 580 sites were variable in one or more of the cpDNAs. The number of nucleotide substitutions per site (p) between Zea and Tripsacum (0.0056) approximates that between other closely related angiosperm genera. The range in values of p among Zea species (0.0003-0.0024) is on the lower end of the range reported for other angiosperm genera. Analysis of the distribution of restriction site mutations throughout the genome indicated that the inverted repeat evolves more slowly than either the small or large unique sequence regions. Parsimony phylogenetic analysis of the restriction site data produced a tree consistent with isoenzymatic and morphological measures of affinity among the species. Chloroplast DNA analysis was not useful in discriminating the subspecies within Zea mays. The lack of any detectable differences between the cpDNA of maize (Z. mays subsp. mays) and some teosintes (Z. mays subsps. mexicana and parviglumis ) is consistent with the hypothesis that maize is a domesticated form of teosinte. Comparison of the degree of sequence divergence for Z. mays cpDNA and the Adh1 locus suggests the latter may be evolving at 10 times the rate of the former. Comparison of rates of sequence evolution for the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes was inconclusive and could not clarify whether these two genomes have dissimilar rates of sequence evolution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banks J. A., Birky C. W., Jr Chloroplast DNA diversity is low in a wild plant, Lupinus texensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6950–6954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doebley J. F., Ma D. P., Renfroe W. T. Insertion/deletion mutations in the Zea chloroplast genome. Curr Genet. 1987;11(8):617–624. doi: 10.1007/BF00393925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johns M. A., Strommer J. N., Freeling M. Exceptionally High Levels of Restriction Site Polymorphism in DNA near the Maize Adh1 Gene. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):733–743. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Palmer J. D., Zamir D. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(16):5006–5010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.16.5006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schaffer H. E., Sederoff R. R. Improved estimation of DNA fragment lengths from Agarose gels. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jul 15;115(1):113–122. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90533-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sederoff R. R., Levings C. S., Timothy D. H., Hu W. W. Evolution of DNA sequence organization in mitochondrial genomes of Zea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):5953–5957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.5953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Timothy D. H., Levings C. S., Pring D. R., Conde M. F., Kermicle J. L. Organelle DNA variation and systematic relationships in the genus Zea: Teosinte. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4220–4224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zurawski G., Clegg M. T., Brown A. H. The Nature of Nucleotide Sequence Divergence between Barley and Maize Chloroplast DNA. Genetics. 1984 Apr;106(4):735–749. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.4.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES