Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 Sep;117(1):149–153. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.149

Average Number of Nucleotide Differences in a Sample from a Single Subpopulation: A Test for Population Subdivision

Curtis Strobeck 1
PMCID: PMC1203183  PMID: 17246396

Abstract

Unbiased estimates of θ = 4Nµ in a random mating population can be based on either the number of alleles or the average number of nucleotide differences in a sample. However, if there is population structure and the sample is drawn from a single subpopulation, these two estimates of θ behave differently. The expected number of alleles in a sample is an increasing function of the migration rates, whereas the expected average number of nucleotide differences is shown to be independent of the migration rates and equal to 4NTµ for a general model of population structure which includes both the island model and the circular stepping-stone model. This contrast in the behavior of these two estimates of θ is used as the basis of a test for population subdivision. Using a Monte-Carlo simulation developed so that independent samples from a single subpopulation could be obtained quickly, this test is shown to be a useful method to determine if there is population subdivision.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (471.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Slatkin M. Testing neutrality in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1982 Mar;100(3):533–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.3.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Strobeck C., Morgan K. The effect of intragenic recombination on the number of alleles in a finite population. Genetics. 1978 Apr;88(4):829–844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.4.829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES