Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 Dec;117(4):777–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.777

Autocorrelation of Gene Frequencies under Isolation by Distance

Guido Barbujani 1
PMCID: PMC1203249  PMID: 3428574

Abstract

Spatial autocorrelation statistics are used for description of geographic variation of gene frequencies, but the relationship of these indices with the parameters describing the genetic structure of populations is not established. A simple relation is derived here between kinship coefficient and a measure of spatial autocorrelation, Moran's I. The autocorrelation coefficient of gene frequencies at a given distance is a direct function of the kinship at that distance, and an inverse function of the standardized gene frequency variance, Fst. Under isolation by distance, the expected values of Moran's I for any allele may be calculated by means of Malécot-Morton function, which predicts an exponential decline of genetic similarity in space. This allows comparison of observed gene frequency patterns with the patterns that should be caused by interaction of short range migration and random genetic drift.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (612.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbujani G. A two-step test for the heterogeneity of Fst values at different loci. Hum Hered. 1985;35(5):292–295. doi: 10.1159/000153565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimura M, Weiss G H. The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49(4):561–576. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewontin R. C., Krakauer J. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics. 1973 May;74(1):175–195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/74.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MORAN P. A. P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika. 1950 Jun;37(1-2):17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Menozzi P., Piazza A., Cavalli-Sforza L. Synthetic maps of human gene frequencies in Europeans. Science. 1978 Sep 1;201(4358):786–792. doi: 10.1126/science.356262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science. 1987 May 15;236(4803):787–792. doi: 10.1126/science.3576198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sokal R. R., Smouse P. E., Neel J. V. The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. XV. Patterns inferred by autocorrelation analysis. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):259–287. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sokal R. R., Wartenberg D. E. A Test of Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Using an Isolation-by-Distance Model. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):219–237. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yasuda N., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Skolnick M., Moroni A. The evolution of surnames: an analysis of their distribution and extinction. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Feb;5(1):123–142. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES