SUMMARY
Dengue-virus-induced humoral immunity can increase the risk of severe disease, but the factors influencing this response are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the contribution of CD4+ T cells to B cell responses in human dengue infection. We identify a dominant peripheral PD-1+ T cell subset that accumulates in severe patients and could induce B cell differentiation via interleukin-21 (IL-21)-related pathway. Single-cell analyses reveal heterogeneity within PD-1+ cells, demonstrating the coexistence of subsets with “helper” (IL-21+) or “cytotoxic” characteristics. The IL-21+ subset displays a distinct clonotypic and transcriptomic signature compared to follicular helper T cells and persists as a memory in lymph nodes. Notably, we show that the IL-21+ subset seems to majorly drive the extrafollicular B cell responses in dengue. Our study establishes the peripheral IL-21+ subset as a potential determinant of the humoral response to dengue virus infection. These findings provide important insights into the T-cell-dependent regulation of humoral responses and can inform the design of effective dengue vaccines.
Graphical Abstract

In brief
Ansari et al. identify a peripheral PD-1+CD4+ T cell subset in dengue that drives B cell differentiation via IL-21 axis. Single-cell analyses uncover distinct non-follicular “helper” and “cytotoxic” subsets in PD-1-expressing cells. This study provides important insights about T cell-B cell interactions, highlighting IL-21+ helper subset as a driver of non-canonical humoral responses in dengue.
INTRODUCTION
Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral disease that causes ~400 million infections worldwide annually, approximately 100 million of which are clinically apparent.1 Symptomatic dengue ranges from a self-limiting mild illness, dengue fever (DF), to life-threatening severe forms, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome.2 In particular, individuals with secondary infections are at greater risk of severe disease. Although the underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms are not fully understood, cross-reactive and poorly neutralizing antibodies are believed to be significant contributors to severe disease.3–10 Apparently, a lower concentration of subneutralizing and cross-reactive antibodies can mediate susceptibility to enhanced disease, which may occur a few months after the first infection.11
These studies highlight the fact that not only antibody durability but also inefficiency in generating optimal memory B cells might lead to poorly protective humoral immunity in patients with dengue. Dengue virus (DENV) memory B cells persist in circulation for several years but are dominated by cross-reactive antibodies with low or no neutralizing potency, in addition to rare populations of potent neutralizing antibodies.12 This is particularly interesting in the context of vaccination, where despite its ability to induce a neutralizing antibody response, the tetravalent dengue vaccine was unable to confer sufficient protection against virus infection.13 On the other hand, massive expansion of plasmablasts occurs in patients with acute dengue14 and is correlated with severe outcomes.15,16 Moreover, memory-derived plasmablasts that produce cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies and target conserved epitopes on DENV serotypes have also been reported in secondary dengue.17,18 These studies indicate the possible implication of more than one mechanism in the generation of memory B cells and plasmablasts in dengue. However, considering the magnitude and durability of memory B cells in dengue, it is likely that the majority of B cell responses are the productive outcome of CD4+ T cell and B cell collaboration.
Several studies have explored the role of CD4+ T cells in dengue. Most of these studies elegantly described the antiviral and cytotoxic functions of CD4+ T cells in dengue.19,20 However, there is limited knowledge available on the type and function of CD4+ T cells that drive humoral immunity to DENV infection. A specialized subset of CD4+ T cells, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, is known to drive protective B cell and antibody responses in germinal centers.21,22 Indeed, the presence of circulating counterparts of Tfh cells has been shown in patients with dengue and is correlated with the plasmablast response.23 Although plasmablast responses during the acute phase correlate well with the frequency of activated peripheral Tfh (pTfh) cells, it is unlikely that germinal center (GC)-Tfh cells alone contribute to the massive expansion of cross-reactive plasmablasts during acute DENV infection.14,15,24,25 Indeed, a recent report suggested coordinated responses of Granzyme B+ CD4+ T cells and Ki67+ plasmablasts.26 Thus, considering the decisive role of the humoral response in dengue pathophysiology, understanding the mechanistic axis of CD4+ T cell-B cell collaboration during humoral immunity development to dengue virus is critical.
In this study, we delineated the mechanism by which CD4+ T cell subsets drive humoral responses to DENV. We utilized a longitudinal cohort of patients with acute dengue to investigate the traits and dynamics of CD4+ T cell and antibody responses during primary and secondary dengue and in various outcomes of disease. We found that patients with secondary infections had early expansion of CD4+ T cells and antibodies, and severe cases were predominantly in the extended phase of acute infection. We report the presence of a novel DENV-specific programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-expressing peripheral CD4+ T cell subset that accumulated more in dengue patients, with increased warning signs and disease severity. This peripheral CD4+ subset showed a positive correlation with in vivo expansion of plasmablasts and with antibodies against non-structural protein NS1 and pre-membrane/membrane/envelope protein (prM/M/E), which was greater than that of DENV Tfh cells. It exhibited “B cell helper” properties and can promote plasmablast differentiation in ex vivo T-B cocultures, mainly through the interleukin-21 (IL-21) helper signaling axis. Using single-cell transcriptomic analyses, we further showed that this B cell helper subset may migrate to inflamed tissues and is a clonally distinct IL-21+ subset in the pool of highly heterogeneous PD-1-expressing cells, along with another subset that harbors cytotoxic functions. Finally, we provide evidence of an extrafollicular B cell phenotype in patients, which strongly correlates with this peripheral “B cell helper” subset. Our findings provide insight into the existence of non-canonical pathways involved in the B cell response in dengue that might originate in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues with the help of the peripheral IL-21+ T cell subset.
RESULTS
Phenotype of proliferating CD4+ T cells in the blood of acute dengue and their dynamicity during the course of disease
To understand the phenotype and dynamics of the CD4+ T cell response during dengue, a total of 170 adult patients with acute dengue were enrolled in a hospital-based cohort (Tables S1 and S2). Blood samples were collected during the acute phase (mean ± SD, 6.7 ± 3.2 days of illness) after hospitalization. Some of the patients (n = 32) were longitudinally followed post discharge during an extended convalescence phase (33.7 ± 12.9 days post symptom onset) (Figure 1A and Table S3). Dengue was confirmed by detecting DENV NS1 antigen or DENV-specific immunoglobulins, IgM and IgG, in the patient’s plasma. Clinical and demographic data were collected from patient records during hospitalization (Tables S1 and S2). Patients with unconfirmed dengue or coinfections were excluded from the study. The majority of the patients (~2/3) in the cohort experienced secondary DENV infection (Figure 1B), as indicated by the IgM-to-IgG ratio. We then analyzed CD4+ T cells in the CD45RA− compartment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a subgroup of acute patients (n = 21). We detected a large number of recently proliferating cells expressing Ki67 (Figures 1C and S1A). The proliferating cells expressed several activation-associated markers, including ICOS, CD38, and HLA-DR (Figures 1D and S1B). The Ki67+ proliferating cells showed elevated expression of CXCR3 but not CCR6, suggesting that they were skewed toward the T helper 1 (Th1) phenotype. Further analysis revealed the existence of CXCR5-expressing Tfh cells as a minor subset (7.5% ± 1.0%). To better understand the coexpression of these phenotypic markers, we performed non-linear dimensional reduction analysis using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) on memory CD4+ T cells from patients with increased proliferation (n = 9) (Figures 1E and S1C). A distinct cluster of activated cells was located at the bottom of the t-SNE plot and coexpressed ICOS, CD38, PD-1, and CXCR3 but not CCR6. CXCR5 exhibited minimal occupancy within this activated cluster. Additionally, the activated cluster had a region with variable Ki67 expression and a relatively small region expressing HLA-DR (Figure 1E). To define the activation phenotype, we used ICOS+Ki67+ double-positive cells, which included recently proliferating and activated cells. Moreover, combinatorial analysis confirmed that all ICOS+Ki67+ cells were equally represented by ICOS+CD38+ cells but not by HLA-DR+CD38+ cells (Figures S1D and S1E). These ICOS+Ki67+ activated cells had greater expression of CD38, PD-1, and CXCR3 (Figure 1F) than did their resting memory counterparts (ICOS−Ki67−). Next, we measured the dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation during the acute phase in patients with primary and secondary dengue. We found a significant increase in activated T cells in primary dengue after 7.4 ± 1.4 days of illness compared to 4.3 ± 0.9 days of illness (Figure 1G). We also observed a similar increase in the frequency of activated cells expressing PD-1 during the later phase of acute illness (Figure 1I). Although secondary-dengue patients exhibited a significant increase in T cell activation during the early phase, the magnitude of T cell activation remained unchanged in the later phase of acute illness (Figures 1G and 1I). We then followed a subgroup (n = 24) of patients post discharge during an extended convalescence phase to examine T cell dynamicity during recovery. A significant 4-fold (median: 12.1%–3.1%) decrease in the frequency of activated T cells was observed in convalescent dengue (Figure 1H), which was also reflected by the decrease in PD-1-expressing cells similar to those in healthy donors (Figure 1J and Table S4). The waning of T cell activation in convalescent dengue was consistent in both primary- and secondary-dengue patients (Figures 1G and 1I). Overall, acute dengue is associated with robust activation and expansion of CD4+ T cells within 1 week after the patient has developed either primary or secondary disease. The expanded T cells in circulation are composed of PD-1-expressing activated cells that swiftly undergo a resolution phase in which these cells seem to have contracted their size or migrated to peripheral tissues.
Figure 1. Phenotypic analyses of activated CD4+ T cells in the blood of acute dengue.

(A) Scheme depicting the time frame of blood sampling during acute and convalescent dengue.
(B) Proportion of primary and secondary infections in the study cohort of acute dengue (DENV).
(C) Representative intranuclear Ki67 staining of CD45RA−CD4+ T cells. A scatter dotplot shows the frequency of Ki67+ cells in healthy donors (HDs) (n = 13) and patients (n = 21).
(D) Scatter barplot shows the frequency of Ki67-positive and Ki67-negative T cells with significant (p < 0.0001) differential expression. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
(E) t-SNE analysis showing the coexpression of the markers shown in (D) in equally concatenated CD45RA−CD4+ T cells from nine DENV samples.
(F) Example fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plot showing the costaining of ICOS and Ki67 in CD45RA−CD4+ T cells, and histogram plots showing the geometric MFI of the markers in double-positive (red) and double-negative (black) cells.
(G) Scatter dotplots displaying the frequency of activated (ICOS+Ki67+) CD4+ T cells at continuous and grouped time points from cross-sectional cohorts of primary (n = 56) and secondary (n = 86) dengue.
(H) Longitudinal analysis of paired acute and convalescent samples (n = 24) showing the frequency of activated CD4+ T cells in comparison with that in HD samples (n = 18).
(I and J) Scatter dotplots quantifying the frequency of PD-1-expressing cells among activated CD4+ T cells in (I) cross-sectional and (J) longitudinal paired acute and convalescent samples as shown in (G) and (H), respectively.
Statistics: (C) Mann-Whitney test, (D) multiple t tests and correction by Holm-Sidak method, (G–J) Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, (H and J) Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. ns, not significant. Data are shown as median ± interquartile range (IQR). See also Figure S1.
Exorbitant accumulation of CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells in patients with dengue with warning signs and severe dengue
We next determined the frequency of subsets co-occurring with pTfh cells that expressed PD-1 (Figure 2A). The frequency of pTfh cells (CXCR5+PD-1+) was significantly greater (healthy donor [HD] 1.4%, DENV 3.6%; Figure 2B) in patients with dengue. In addition, the peripheral CXCR5−PD-1+ subset was highly accumulated (HD 11.7%, DENV 24.7%; Figure 2B). Interestingly, CXCR5−PD-1+ cells were the predominant subset in the activated T cell pool (~75%, Figure S2A) and exhibited greater activation and expansion than did pTfh cells (CXCR5+PD-1+, 15.9%; CXCR5−PD-1+, 32.3%; Figure 2C). To determine the association of these two activated subsets with disease outcome, we classified patients with acute dengue into dengue fever without warning signs (DF without WS, n = 37), DF with WS (n = 116), and severe dengue (severe bleeding, leakage syndromes, and organ involvement, n = 33) according to World Health Organization guidelines27 (Tables S1 and S2). Only one sampling was performed for all the patients during the acute phase, except for approximately 16 patients (out of 170) whose samples were taken twice during hospitalization. The disease outcomes of these patients were classified based on their clinical and physical examination at the time of sampling. Consistent with the findings of previous studies, severe dengue was more strongly associated with secondary infection than was DF without WS (~76% versus ~49%, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.02) (Figure 2D). The frequency of total pTfh and CXCR5−PD-1+ cells was greater in patients with WS than in patients without WS. However, a consistently greater magnitude of CXCR5−PD-1+ cells was retained in severe dengue, which was not the case for pTfh cells (Figures 2E–2G). Notably, the magnitude of these subsets did not differ between primary and secondary dengue for any disease outcome (Figures S2B and S2C). Unlike pTfh cells, which exhibited no changes in disease outcome (Figures 2H and S2D), CXCR5−PD-1+ cells exhibited strikingly greater frequency of activation (ICOS+Ki67+) in DF with WS and severe dengue (Figure 2I). In addition, CXCR5−PD-1+ cells were slightly more activated in patients with secondary dengue with or without WS but remained at similar levels during severe outcomes (Figure S2E). Thus, CXCR5−PD-1+ cells with an activated phenotype were more strongly associated with WS and severe disease outcomes. To further confirm that the CXCR5−PD-1+ cells do not contain regulatory T (Treg) cells, we analyzed CD25+FOXP3+ cells in dengue (Figures S2F and S2G). CXCR5−PD-1+ cells with increased PD-1 expression were present mainly in the non-Treg compartment (Figure S2G). Collectively, these data provide evidence for the excessive expansion of the peripheral CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cell subset in patients with pathologically progressive dengue with warning signs and severity.
Figure 2. Activated CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells accumulate in patients with dengue with warning signs and severity.

(A) Representative FACS plots showing the expression levels of CXCR5 and PD-1 on CD45RA−CD4+ T cells.
(B) A scatter barplot was used to quantify the frequency of each indicated subset of CD45RA−CD4+ T cells in HD (n = 18) and acute dengue virus (n = 21) samples. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
(C) Representative FACS plots (left panels) and the frequency of activated (ICOS+Ki67+) T cells (right panel) within each of the four phenotypic subsets according to the expression of CXCR5 and PD-1. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
(D) Graphical view of disease categorization of acute dengue samples with different degrees of severity: dengue fever (DF) without warning signs (WS), DF with WS, and severe. The frequency of secondary dengue within each of the categories is shown.
(E) Representative FACS plots showing the frequency of CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cell subsets in DFs from patients without WS, DFs from patients with WS, and severe dengue (DENV) samples.
(F and G) Scatter dotplots quantifying the frequency of (F) CXCR5+PD-1+ and (G) CXCR5−PD-1+ subsets in DENV samples with worsening severity: DF without WS (n = 24), DF with WS (n = 66), and severe (n = 26).
(H and I) Frequencies of activated cells within the two indicated subsets (H) CXCR5+PD-1+ and (I) CXCR5−PD-1+, as shown in (F) and (G), respectively.
Statistics: (B) multiple t tests followed by Holm-Sidak method; (C) Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; (F–I) Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. ns, not significant. Data are presented as median ± IQR. See also Figure S2.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing and TCR-sequencing analyses of activated CD4+ T cells from acute dengue
As we found the strong evidence of increased expansion of CXCR5−PD-1+ cells in peripheral blood of acute dengue, we next explored the cellular heterogeneity and transcriptomic landscape of the PD-1-expressing CXCR5− subset in acutely ill patients with dengue. We thus performed single-cell transcriptome analyses of the activated CD4+ T cell population (ICOS+CD38+), which was enriched for the majority of proliferating cells (Figure 3A). After applying the quality-control parameters of the analysis pipeline, a total of 4,361 activated T cells (pooled from three patients) were recovered for analysis (Figures S3A and S3B). We integrated the datasets using the Seurat canonical correlation analysis (CCA)-based method28 and performed graph-based clustering after regression of confounding factors such as the number of unique molecular identifiers, number of genes, and percentage of mitochondrial genes to create a uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot (Figures 3B, S3C, and S3D). UMAP analysis revealed ten distinctly positioned clusters in the dengue-activated CD4+ T cell population, reflecting their unique transcriptional signatures (Figures 3B–3E). Clusters 0–6 consisted of the majority of cells, accounting for 95% of the total cells (Figures 3C and S3E). Differential gene expression analysis revealed highly enriched transcripts in each cluster, as shown in Figures 3D and 3E and Table S5A. The hierarchical ranking of clusters based on enriched transcripts identified clusters 9, 8, and 7 as very distinct rare clusters (Figure 3D). Cluster 0 was enriched with Treg (TREG) cell gene signatures (IL2RA, FOXP3, RTKN2, and IKZF2) (Figure 3E). Cluster 2 presented gene signatures of T central memory (TCM) cells (TCF7 and CCR7). This cluster was located nearest to cluster 8 and included naive T (TN) cell-like gene signatures and uniquely expressed FHIT and SNED1. Cluster 7 had an enrichment of Th17 (TH17) cells and expressed CCR6, CTSH, and KLRB1. Clusters 5 and 6 were highly enriched for the effector TH1 cell gene signatures LAG3, GZMA, GZMK, and PRF1. Clusters 3, 1, and 4 expressed the TH1 gene along with the transcripts associated with the cell-cycle genes MKI67, PCNA, MCM7, and TOP2A, which was also confirmed by cell-cycle phase analysis (Figures 3E and 3F). Cluster 9 expressed the T effector memory (TEM) genes (CCL4 and CCL5) and uniquely upregulated the expression of two long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), FP671120.4 and FP236383.3.
Figure 3. Single-cell RNA-seq and TCR-seq analyses of activated CD4+ T cells from acute dengue revealed heterogeneity in the CXCR5−PD-1+ population.

(A) Example gating scheme for FACS sorting of live activated CD4+ T cells coexpressing ICOS and CD38 from acute dengue PBMCs.
(B) Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome of sorted ICOS+CD38+CD4+ T cells from patients (n = 3) with acute dengue. The plot shows the Seurat-based clustering of 4,361 cells displayed by UMAP.
(C) Barplot showing the percentages of Seurat clusters.
(D) Heatmap showing the average expression of the top significantly enriched genes in each cluster. The top enriched genes in each cluster versus all remaining cells were calculated by the Seurat FindAllMarkers function with an adjusted p value <0.05, a log2 fold change >0.25, and 25% as the minimum percentage of cells expressing DEGs.
(E) Dotplot showing the percentage and average expression of the top ten genes enriched in each cluster. To avoid redundancy, histone genes (n = 80) enriched in cycling gene sets were excluded.
(F) UMAP plot showing the cell-cycle phase annotation according to the Seurat function CellCycleScoring.
(G) UMAP plot showing the combined expression of the CXCR5 (green) and PDCD1 (red) genes.
(H) Violin plots showing the expression of the CXCR5, PDCD1, and CXCR3 genes in each cluster.
(I) Single-cell trajectory analyzed by monocle3 showing the interconnection (black line) among cells in different clusters based on the gene enrichment in each cluster.
(J) UMAP plot depicting cells of different clonal sizes: single, small, medium, large, and hyperexpanded.
(K) Barplot showing the number of average cells per clonotype in each cluster.
(L) Heatmap showing the percentage of overlapping clonotypes between two designated clusters in rows and columns. Only expanded clonotypes (clonal size >1) (n = 231) were included in the clonotype overlap analysis.
(M) Circos plots showing the overlapping clonotypes between a cluster of interest and the remaining clusters shown as connecting lines between two arcs representing the two clusters. The length of the arc represents the number of unique expanded clonotypes in a given cluster. Vertical lines against each arc show the log10 scaled number of cells per unique clonotype.
See also Figure S3.
Next, we identified clusters expressing CXCR5, PDCD1, and CXCR3 transcripts (Figures 3G, 3H, and S3F). We detected the expression of PDCD1 transcripts in all the clusters except for clusters 0 (TREG) and 8 (TN), which accounted for ~77% of the total cells. Cells coexpressing CXCR5 or CXCR5 and PDCD1 (~15%) were mostly present in cluster 2 (TCM). Moreover, highly upregulated expression of CXCR3 was found in clusters TH1(5), TH1(6), TH1(3), TH1(1), and TH1(4). These observations were further supported by the expression of cell surface proteins in these clusters (Figure S3F, csp). Interestingly, single-cell trajectory analysis revealed that the PD-1-expressing TCM, TH1(5), TH1(6), and TH1(3) clusters were closely related, with a trajectory starting from a less differentiated TCM to TH1(6) and subsequently branching into two alternative clusters, TH1(1) and TH1(4) at the top and TH1(5) and TH1(3) at the bottom (Figure 3I). Cluster TH1(6) appeared to constitute an intermediate TH1 effector population whose expression extended downward into the more differentiated TH1 effector cluster TH1(5) and later into the cell-cycling cluster TH1(3). Furthermore, cluster 0 (TREG) exhibited a trajectory directly related to the proliferative clusters TH1(1) and TH1(4).
We then performed single-cell T cell receptor sequencing (TCR-seq) analysis to inspect the clonal relationships and expansions within these clusters. We found one hyperexpanded clonotype TRAV13–1.TRBV2 (945 clones) and four large clonotypes, TRAV29.TRBV11–2 (58 clones), TRAV12–1.TRBV12–4 (47 clones), TRAV21.TRBV5–1 (46 clones), and TRAV26–1.TRBV19 (44 clones) (Figure S3G and Table S5B). The majority of hyperexpanded and large/medium expanded clonotypes were present in clusters TH1(5), TH1(6), TH1(3), TH1(1), and TH1(4), resulting in an average of at least 1.5 cells per clonotype observed in these clusters. On the other hand, cluster 0 (TREG) and cluster 2 (TCM) cells exhibited mostly single/small expanded clonotypes (Figures 3J, 3K, and S3H). Clonotype overlap analysis revealed a significant distribution of TCR clonotypes between the proliferative clusters TH1(1) and TH1(4) and other major clusters, including cluster 0 (TREG) (Figures 3L–3M). Notably, the PD-1-expressing clusters TH1(5), TH1(6), and TH1(3) cells exhibited significant overlap (Figure S3I) but to a lesser extent with the Tfh cell subset containing cluster 2 (TCM).
Certainly, these data suggested considerable heterogeneity in activated CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells, which were mostly composed of proliferative and TH1 effector/effector memory subsets with hyper- and large expandability and significant clonal overlap. Moreover, the CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells in dengue seem to originate from a repertoire distinct from that of the pTfh subset, as apparent by the marginal clonal overlap between PD-1-expressing clusters and the Tfh-containing cluster.
The CXCR5−PD-1+ subset showed enrichment in DENV-specific CD4+ T cells and remained detectable in blood of dengue-recovered individuals
With the clear indication of clonal expansion of T cells from single-cell analysis, we sought to evaluate the DENV antigen-specific cells in dengue blood to better understand the dynamics and stability of the T cell subsets discussed above. We analyzed DENV-specific T cells in PBMCs from dengue-infected patients stimulated with the megapool of CD4 T cell reactive peptide (DENVpep) derived from all four DENV (DENV1–DENV4) serotypes29 via an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. AIM analysis of a subset of acute patients (n = 44) revealed an average of 0.78% of DENV-specific cells in the total pool of CD45RA−CD4+ T cells (Figures 4A and 4B). Antigen-independent stimulation with the mitogen concanavalin A (ConA) induced an average response of 2.59% of the cells (Figure 4C). The DENV-specific T cells showed a significant increase from an average of 4–7 days of acute illness. Only 0.28% of DENV-specific T cells remained detectable in convalescent dengue approximately 34 days after symptom onset (Figures 4D and 4E). We next determined the enrichment of antigen-specific T cells in the CXCR5- and PD-1-expressing subsets (Figure S4A). Interestingly, the PD-1-expressing CXCR5+ and CXCR5− subsets were more enriched in antigen-specific cells than was their PD-1-negative counterparts. Strikingly, greater enrichment of antigen-specific T cells was found in the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset than in the pTfh subset (CXCR5+PD-1+ 1.35%, CXCR5−PD-1+ 2.88%; Figures S4A and S4B), which was not the case with ConA stimulation. Although both subsets exhibited similar dynamic patterns until the recovery phase, the expansion of DENV-specific T cells was more apparent in the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset (Figures 4F and 4G). The reduction in the activated phenotype (ICOS+PD-1+) from acute (71.0%) to convalescent (33.8%) dengue indicated a shift in antigen-specific T cells from an activated effector to a memory phenotype (Figures S4C and S4D), which was also reflected in the Th1-like (CXCR3+CCR6−) skewed phenotype (Figures S4E and S4F). We further examined individuals who recovered from dengue (~10 months after symptom onset, Table S3) to investigate whether antigen-specific CD4+ T cells acquired memory. Stimulation with DENVpep resulted in approximately 0.17% antigen-specific circulating T cells (Figure 4H), which comprised a CXCR5−PD-1+ subset marked with a Th1 memory phenotype (Figures 4I–4K). To determine whether this memory subset also existed in the lymphoid organs, we examined the lymph node (LN) tissues of DENV-seropositive individuals from the dengue endemic region who were previously exposed to DENV. Although among the total Tfh subsets, CXCR5+PD-1+ and GC-Tfh cells (CXCR5++PD-1++) were highly enriched in secondary lymphoid organs (LNs), interestingly we found similar frequencies of the total CXCR5−PD-1+ subset in paired LN tissue and blood (Figures S4G and S4H). Antigen-specific stimulation with DENVpep detected DENV-specific CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+ cells in the LN tissues of these virus-exposed individuals. However, the peripheral blood and LN tissue cells exhibited variable responses to antigen-specific stimulation (Figures S4I and S4J).
Figure 4. CXCR5−PD-1+ cells are present in the dengue-virus-specific memory CD4+ T cell pool and circulate persistently in the blood of dengue-recovered individuals.

(A) FACS plots showing the surface staining of OX40 (CD134) and CD25 in CD45RA−CD4+ T cells from acute dengue in the vehicle control (DMSO), stimulation with DENV peptide megapool (DENVpep), or concanavalin A (ConA) for 18–20 h.
(B and C) Frequency of OX40+CD25+ T cells among CD45RA−CD4+ T cells in acute dengue PBMCs stimulated with (B) DMSO or DENVpep (n = 44) or (C) DMSO or ConA (n = 16).
(D) Representative plots depicting the frequency of DENV-specific T cells among CD45RA−CD4+ T cells in PBMC samples at 4, 7, and 34 days post symptom onset.
(E) Frequency of background (DMSO)-subtracted DENV-specific CD45RA−CD4+ T cells at continuous and grouped time points (days post symptom onset) in cross-sectional DENV samples (n = 72).
(F) Representative images of CXCR5 and PD-1 staining in DENV-specific CD45RA−CD4+ T cells after DENVpep stimulation.
(G) Percentage of T cells from the CXCR5+PD-1+ (red circles) and CXCR5−PD-1+ (blue squares) subsets from continuous and grouped time points (days post symptom onset) after subtraction from the DENV-specific background (DMSO), as shown in (E).
(H) Frequency of OX40+CD25+ memory cells among CD45RA−CD4+ T cells stimulated with DMSO or DENVpep in seven long-term (~10 months) follow-up individuals.
(I) Staining of CXCR5 and PD-1 in OX40+CD25+ DENV-specific memory (CD45RA−) T cells as shown in (H).
(J and K) (J) Example FACS plots and (K) frequency of CCR6−CXCR3+ cells among OX40+CD25+ memory cells stimulated with DMSO or DENVpep. Statistics: (B, C, H, and K) paired t test; (E and G) Kruskal-Wallis test corrected using Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. ns, not significant. Data are presented as median ± IQR. See also Figure S4.
Taken together, these findings demonstrate the expansion of DENV-specific CD4+ T cells in the blood of acute dengue, predominantly within the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset. Although the frequency of CXCR5−PD-1+ cells significantly declined during recovery, these cells acquired a memory-like phenotype that persisted long term both in blood and lymphoid tissues.
Activated CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells are positively associated with expanded plasmablasts and antibody response in dengue
As the PD-1-expressing subset showed dominance and co-occurrence with the pTfh subset, we attempted to determine the associations of these subsets with the antibody response in patients with dengue infection. We thus measured anti-NS1 and anti-prM/M/E IgG in acute and convalescent dengue plasma. As in T cells, in primary-dengue patients there was a gradual increase in anti-NS1 IgG, while an early and significantly greater response was detected in secondary-dengue patients at all time points (Figures 5A and S5A). Similar results were observed for the anti-prM/M/E IgG titers (Figure S5B). Similarly, both cross-sectional (Figure 5A) and longitudinal (Figure 5B) anti-NS1 IgG levels continued to increase during recovery, which was not the case for anti-prM/M/E IgG (Figures S5B and S5C), consistent with the longer availability of the NS1 antigen but not of virion particles during disease progression.30 Notably, the antibody response to both antigens was significantly greater in the severe dengue group than in the DF with WS group (anti-NS1; p = 0.04; Figure 5C) (anti-prM/M/E; p = 0.03; Figure 5D). Unlike binding antibodies, the DENV-neutralizing potential (Neut50 titers) was comparable between these two groups (Figure 5E). However, cross-sectional and longitudinal levels of DENV-neutralizing titers in acute and convalescent dengue showed a trend similar to that of anti-prM/M/E antibody titer, with an increased magnitude in secondary compared to primary dengue at all time points (Figures S5D and S5E). CXCL13 plays a critical role in T-B crosstalk and may indicate a productive GC response.31 We found significant levels of CXCL13 in both primary- and secondary-dengue patients at early onset (2–5 days of illness) of acute disease (Figure S5F), suggestive of active GC activity in acute dengue. However, CXCL13 levels remained elevated in both primary and secondary dengue, with slightly lower levels observed in secondary dengue between 6 and 11 days of illness (Figure S5F). Subsequently, CXCL13 levels decreased to basal levels during the convalescence phase (Figures S5F and S5G). Thus, CXCL13 levels were found to follow a trend similar to that of CD4+ T cell responses. As an output of T-B crosstalk, we next evaluated antibody-producing B cells, called plasmablasts, in acute disease. We found strong evidence of plasmablast differentiation in acute patients (p < 0.0001; Figures 5F and S5H). Most of these plasmablasts expressed Ki67, CD27, CD71, and CXCR3 but downregulated the expression of CD19 and CD20, indicating their effector phenotype (Figures 5G, 5H, and S5I). To establish the biological relevance of the expanded CD4+ T cell subsets in relation to humoral responses, we performed correlation analyses. Unlike activated pTfh (CXCR5+PD-1+), which was positively associated only with plasmablasts, the expansion of activated CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells was strongly positively correlated with both antibodies (anti-NS1 and anti-prM/M/E IgG) and plasmablasts of the acute phase of dengue (Figure 5I). However, both of these subsets showed no correlation with the neutralizing antibodies (Figure 5I).
Figure 5. Activated CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells are positively associated with antibody responses and plasmablasts in dengue.

(A) Scatterplots showing the quantity (area under the curve [AUC]) of anti-NS1 IgG at continuous and grouped time points (days post symptom onset) from cross-sectional cohorts of primary (n = 62) and secondary (n = 92) dengue samples.
(B) Longitudinal analysis of anti-NS1 IgG (AUC) in paired acute and convalescent dengue samples (n = 27) in comparison with DENV-seronegative HD samples.
(C) ELISA OD curves of anti-NS1 IgG in serially diluted plasma samples from DF patients with WS (n = 70) and severe (n = 31) dengue. A scatterplot was generated to compare the quantity of the anti-NS1 antibody (AUC) between the two groups.
(D) ELISA OD curves of DENV-specific structural protein (prM/M/E) IgG in DFs with WS (n = 29) and severe (n = 16) dengue samples. Scatterplot showing the levels of the anti-prM/M/E antibody (AUC) in the indicated groups.
(E) DENV-neutralizing antibody titration curves in plasma of DFs with WS (n = 45) and severe (n = 10) dengue samples. Scatterplot shows the DENV-neutralization 50 (Neut50) titers in the indicated groups.
(F) Representative FACS plots and scatter dotplot showing the frequency of plasmablasts (CD20−CD38++) among CD27+ B cells in HDs (n = 11) and DENV-infected patients (DENV) (n = 25).
(G) Scatter barplot showing the frequency of Ki67-, CD71-, and CXCR3-positive cells among naive and memory B cells and plasmablasts from acute dengue virus (DENV) samples. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
(H) Histogram plots showing the geometric MFI of CD27, CD19, Ki67, CD71, CXCR3, and SSC in naive (black), memory B (blue), and plasmablast (red) cells.
(I) xy plots showing the correlations of the frequency of activated CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+ cells with the levels of anti-NS1 (n = 90), anti-prM/M/E (n = 40) DENV-IgG, DENV-Neut50 titer (n = 62), and plasmablast (n = 30) in acute samples.
Statistics: (A and B) Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; (B) paired analysis by Wilcoxon signed rank test; (C–F) Mann-Whitney test; (G) two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; (I) Pearson’s correlation test. ns, not significant. The dotted line in (A)–(E) represents the limit of positivity. Data are presented as median ± IQR. See also Figure S5.
Taken together, these data provide an overall understanding of antibody and plasmablast responses during acute dengue. Certainly these responses were strongly associated with the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset, indicating the role of this subset in regulating humoral immunity in dengue.
Antigen-specific CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells robustly secrete B cell helper cytokines and are capable of promoting B cell responses via the IL-21 signaling axis
The strong association of the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset with in vivo antibody and plasmablast response instigated a detailed investigation of its B cell help potential. We first examined the production of CD40L and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in ex-vivo-stimulated PBMCs with DENVpep for a short time (~6 h) via an intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay. DENVpep stimulation induced a significant increase in the number of CD40L- and IFN-γ-producing cells in memory T cells (Figure 6A). On average, 1.36% and 1.04% of the DENV-reactive IFN-γ+ and CD40L+ cells, respectively, were present in acute patients (Figure 6B). There was a significantly greater frequency of DENV-reactive T cells coexpressing IFN-γ and CD40L (p = 0.0002; Figure 6C). Moreover, most of these cytokine producers (CD40L, IFN-γ, and IL-10) were enriched in T cells expressing PD-1 and CXCR3, indicating the presence of functionally potent DENV-specific Th1 effector cells (Figure 6D). We next analyzed the cytokine-producing ability of the CXCR5+ and CXCR5− subsets of PD-1-expressing T cells and found that the CXCR5− cells contained significantly more DENV-specific cytokine producers (Figures 6E and 6F). Even after TCR-independent stimulation, the CXCR5− subset expressed significantly more IFN-γ than did the CXCR5+ subset, although the two subsets expressed CD40L at equal levels (Figure 6E). We further confirmed the cytokine secretory function of the sorted, purified CXCR5+ and CXCR5− subsets, which was like the findings of the IFN-γ-ICS analysis (Figure S6A). Because the cytokine IL-21 is important for B cell differentiation and function, we also examined IL-21 secretion in these sort-purified subsets. ELISpot analysis revealed that the CXCR5− subset can produce and secrete significant amounts of IL-21 compared to the CXCR5+ subset upon stimulation with both antigen-specific and mitogen conditions (DENVpep CXCR5+: 73 spot-forming units [SFUs]/million; DENVpep CXCR5−: 128 SFUs/million; Figure S6B). To determine whether the cytokine-producing CXCR5− subset can also engage B cells in productive crosstalk, we utilized our recently described autologous T-B coculture assay.32 Here, the B cell helper activity of the CXCR5− subset was measured in autologous cocultures with sort-purified B cells in DENV-specific settings. Activated T cells from acute disease patients exhibited poor survival after long-term (up to 9 days) coculture (data not shown). Therefore, we used memory CD4+ T cells from DENV-seropositive individuals with significant DENV-reactive IgG titers (Figure S6C). Naive T cells failed to elicit a B cell response due to insufficient peptide-reactive T cells (Figures 6G and 6H). On the other hand, upon DENVpep stimulation, both CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+ cells strongly promoted plasmablast differentiation. Unlike in memory CXCR5+ cells, in which both PD-1+/PD-1− subsets elicited similar B cell responses, only CXCR5−PD-1+ cells produced significantly greater B cell outputs than did their PD-1− counterparts. Similarly, like pTfh cells, CXCR5−PD-1+ cells elicited detectable antibody responses in the coculture supernatant for the majority of the donors tested (5/8 donors; Figures S6D and S6E) for both the DENV NS1 and prM/M/E antigens. Notably, only memory B cells, not naive B cells, responded preferentially to the B cell help provided by CXCR5−PD-1+ and pTfh cells (Figures 6I and S6F). Tfh cells secrete IL-21, IL-10, and IL-4, which are major helper axes that promote plasmablast differentiation and class switching.33,34 Thus, we further attempted to identify the dominant cytokine regulating the help axis of CXCR5−PD-1+ cells by blocking the activity of the cytokines IL-21, IL-10, and IL-4 in cocultures. With respect to CXCR5−PD-1+ T cell cocultures, we observed a strong reduction in plasmablast output in the IL-21-blocking condition (~60%, Figure 6J) and a moderate reduction in plasmablast output after blocking IL-10 (~25%), but not after inhibiting IL-4, which is a prominent Th2 cytokine. This finding was consistent with the help axis utilized by pTfh cells (Figure S6G).
Figure 6. DENV-specific CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells are functionally potent and capable of driving plasmablast and antibody responses.

(A) FACS plots showing the intracellular staining of CD40L and IFN-γ in CD45RA−CD4+ T cells from acute dengue stimulated with DMSO, PMA/ionomycin (PMA/iono), or DENVpep for 6 h.
(B) Frequencies of CD40L+ and IFN-γ+ cells among CD45RA−CD4+ T cells.
(C) Frequency of CD40L+IFN-γ+ cells among CD45RA−CD4+ T cells. Data are shown as median ± IQR.
(D) FACS plots showing the costaining of CD40L, IFN-γ, and IL-10 with PD-1 and CXCR3 in CD4+ T cells stimulated with DENVpep.
(E) Frequencies of CD40L+ and IFN-γ+ cells in the CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+ subsets stimulated with DENVpep and PMA/iono.
(F) Plots showing the costaining of IFN-γ and IL-10 (left) and a barplot showing the frequency of IL-10+ cells in the DENVpep condition (right).
(G) Representative FACS plots showing the frequency of plasmablasts (CD20−CD38++) induced in autologous cocultures of different CD4+ T cell subsets and CD20+ B cells from DENV-seropositive individuals cultured for 9 days in DMSO and DENVpep conditions.
(H) Number of plasmablasts in T:B cocultures in the presence of DENVpep, as shown in (G).
(I) Barplots quantifying plasmablast differentiation in cocultures of the CXCR5−PD-1+ T cell subset and naive (CD27−) or memory (CD27+) CD20+ B cells.
(J) Example plots showing the plasmablast frequency in T:B cocultures of CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells and CD20+ B cells in the presence of DENVpep with or without blocking conditions with IL-21R-Fc, anti-IL-10, and anti-IL-4. Right: data in the scatter barplot are background subtracted from DMSO and normalized to the control (without blocking) condition.
Statistics: (B and C) paired t test; (E and F) Wilcoxon signed-rank test; (H) one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; (I) one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test; (J) one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. ns, not significant. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S6.
Taken together, these data indicated that the DENV-specific T cells within the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset were functionally effective at secreting effector cytokines, including those required for B cell help, and that the cytokine-producing cells were largely enriched in PD-1-expressing subsets. Moreover, the CXCR5− PD-1+ subset is capable of productive collaboration with B cells in antigen-specific settings, which is mostly driven by the IL-21 signaling axis.
Distinct features of the B cell helper subset in the CXCR5−PD-1+ population with tissue migration patterns and strong associations with extrafollicular B cells in dengue
A greater B cell helper activity and strong association with antibody responses prompted us to investigate the functional signatures of CXCR5−PD-1+ T cell subsets with B cell helper traits. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data, we closely examined the gene signatures of PD-1-expressing clusters TH1(5), TH1(6), and TH1(3). We found that cluster TH1(5) presented the highest expression of PDCD1 together with other activating and coinhibitory genes (Figures 7A and S7A). In addition, cluster TH1(5) cells strongly enriched TH1 effector cytokines, including IFNG, GZMA, PRF1, and GZMB (Figures 7A and 7B; Table S6A). Most of these cytokines confer cytotoxic effects and are upregulated by type 1 interferon signaling. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) also revealed strong cytotoxic CD4+ T cell and interferon response signatures in these clusters. This cluster also showed the highest positive enrichment of both these signatures (Figures S7B and S7C) expressing the important TH1 transcriptional regulators TBX21, STAT4, and RUNX3 (Figure 7A). Notably, cells in clusters TH1(5), TH1(6), and TH1(3) exhibited strong tissue migration markers and expressed various chemokine receptors and integrins (CCR2, CCR5, CXCR3, CX3CR1, and S1PR1). The clusters also showed the expression of adhesion molecules important for differentiation and function, SH2D1A, SLAMF1, and SLAMF6. In addition, cluster 2 (TCM) cells strongly expressed the Tfh-associated transcriptional regulators TCF7, LEF1, TOX2, BCL6, and ID2 and the migration genes CCR7, SELL, S1PR1, and CXCR5 (Figures 7A and S7A; Table S6A). Certainly, the data further confirmed that cluster TH1(5) was highly TH1 polarized with cytotoxic CD4 signatures, while cluster 2 (TCM) had a central memory and Tfh-related gene signature.
Figure 7. Distinct features and diverse clonotypes of the helper subset of CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells and their strong association with the extrafollicular B cell response.

(A) Dotplot showing the average expression and percentage of the indicated genes in the selected clusters.
(B) Barplots showing the percentage of cells expressing IFNG, CD40LG, IL21, IL10, GZMB, and GNLY transcripts in the indicated clusters.
(C) UMAP plot showing IFNG-positive cells expressing GZMB (GZMB+), IL21 (IL21+), or both (GZMB+IL21+).
(D) Volcano plot showing the DEGs between the GZMB+ and IL21+ cell populations. Significant DEGs were calculated by Seurat FindMarkers function with adjusted p value <0.05, log2|fold change| >0.25, and 10% as minimum percentage of cells expressing DEGs.
(E) Heatmap showing the comparative average expression of all DEGs enriched in IL21+ versus GZMB+ cells.
(F) Violin plots showing the expression of the indicated genes in IL21+ and GZMB+ cells.
(G) Circos plot showing the overlapping clonotypes (connecting lines) between the IL21+ and GZMB+ cell populations. The length of the arc represents the number of unique clonotypes in the designated group. The vertical lines against each arc indicate the log10 scaled clonotype size.
(H) Representative FACS plots for phenotyping of extrafollicular (CD21−CD11c+) cells among double-negative (IgD−CD27−) CD19+ B cells. The barplot shows the enrichment of the extrafollicular B cell phenotype in the indicated B cell subsets. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
(I) Histograms depicting the comparative expression (gMFI) of the surface markers CXCR5 and CD19 in extrafollicular B cells (red) and naive cells (black).
(J) xy plots showing the correlations of the frequency of activated CXCR5+PD-1+ and CXCR5−PD-1+ subsets with the frequency of extrafollicular B cells in patients (n = 20) with acute dengue.
Statistics: (H) Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; (J) Pearson’s correlation test. ns, not significant. See also Figure S7.
Importantly, the proliferative PD-1-expressing clusters, especially cluster TH1(3), presented the highest expression of IFNG, CD40LG, and IL21 (Figure 7B). As demonstrated above and as IL-21 signaling is the major B cell help axis utilized by the PD-1-expressing subset, we identified IFNG+ cells expressing the GZMB and IL21 transcripts to distinguish between the Th1 cytotoxic and helper subsets, respectively (Figure 7C). Interestingly, we found that the GZMB+ cells, which were mainly enriched in clusters TH1(5) and TH1(6), had no significant coexpression with IL21+ cells, but the IL21+ cells, which were enriched in proliferative clusters TH1(3), TH1(1), and TH1(4), showed some coexpression with GZMB+ cells (Figure S7D). Polyclonal activation with the SEB antigen also confirmed the presence of two cell groups, one that expressed the cytokine IL-21 and one that expressed GZMB, among the memory CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells (Figure S7E). We thus performed differential gene expression analysis between PD-1-expressing IL21+ and GZMB+ cells after excluding GZMB+IL21+ cells (Figure 7D and Table S6B). Among the cytotoxic GZMB+ cells, those with genes related to cytotoxic function, GZMA, GZMH, NKG7, PRF1, and GNLY, exhibited greater terminal differentiation. Strikingly, these cells presented increased expression of the HOPX transcription factor, which is induced by T-bet upon repeated antigenic stimulation and is enriched in terminally differentiated effector Th1 cells.35 In addition, these cells upregulated CD44 transcripts, which may promote their survival as Th1 effector memories.36 In addition, helper IL21+ cells appeared to be more proliferative than GZMB+ cells because they expressed the key cell-cycle regulators CDK6 and CCND2 and had higher transcript levels of the glycolytic pathway, PFKL and PKM. IL21+ cells expressed the mitochondrial chaperonins HSPD1 and HSPE1 and the antioxidant genes MT1G, SOD1, and PRDX1, which can support metabolic adaptations and protection from oxidative stress. Interestingly, these IL21+ cells strongly expressed the TOX2 transcription factor, which is expressed mainly by TCM cells and might be essential for the maintenance of these helper cells in the central memory compartment. Importantly, LGMN, a key asparaginyl endopeptidase expressed in lysosomes, is highly expressed in IL21+ helper cells. This enzyme has broad targets of substrates, including cathepsins and a1-thymosin, and can intrinsically promote Th1 activity in these helper cells.37 Notably, compared with the double-negative or double-positive cells, the IL21+ and GZMB+ cells exhibited distinct gene landscapes (Figure 7E). However, the two cell groups, IL21+ and GZMB+ cells, expressed comparable levels of PDCD1, MKI67, CCR2, and CCR5 (Figure 7F), suggesting that both contained CXCR5−PD-1+ proliferative cells and had similar tissue migration patterns. We further examined the clonotype diversity and found that only 13 TCR clonotypes were shared between the two cell groups, with 13/63 having IL21+ and 13/136 having GZMB+ cells (Figure 7G). TCR overlap was observed only in the highly expandable clones. These data indicate the existence of a pre-determined repertoire of multifunctional precursors that acquire either helper or cytotoxic features.
Circulating CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells showed strong signs of tissue migration, indicating active inflammation in peripheral tissues.38 This was evident from the cytokine analysis data (Figure S7F), which showed the expression of the CXCR3 chemokine receptor ligands CXCL9 (MIG) and CXCL10 (IP-10), type 1 IFN, IFN-α2, and various proinflammatory cytokines—LIF, IL-1Rα, IL-1α, IL-2Rα, and IFN-γ. We thus hypothesized that these tissue-migrating T cells would interact with B cells at extrafollicular sites, including peripheral tissues, and elicit B cell responses. Therefore, we analyzed the extrafollicular B cells of patients with acute dengue and found that they had higher expression of CD11c but lower expression of CD21.39 CD21−CD11c+ B cells in the blood of acute patients consisted mainly of IgD−CD27− (double-negative [DN]) and IgD+CD27− (naive) B cells, followed by IgD+CD27− (switched memory) B cells (Figure S7G). However, extrafollicular B cells were more enriched among DN cells than among naive B cells (Figure 7H). The CD21−CD11c+ DN B cells presented increased CD19 expression but reduced CXCR5 expression, possibly because of their ability to migrate away from B cell follicles (Figure 7I). Remarkably, these extrafollicular (CD21−CD11c+ DN) B cells showed a strong positive association with activated CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells but not with CXCR5+PD-1+ (pTfh) cells (Figure 7J), suggesting their coordinated expansion and differentiation in acute dengue.
Collectively, our single-cell analysis clearly established substantial heterogeneity in CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells, which primarily consisted of specialized subsets with cytotoxic or helper functions. Notably, these data are the first evidence for the presence of extrafollicular B cells in dengue, which seem to be induced by accumulating peripheral B cell helper T cell subset.
DISCUSSION
Severe dengue is often associated with secondary infections marked by rapidly expanding T and B cells and exaggerated humoral responses leading to immunopathology.15,18,40,41 This study determines the contribution of CD4+ T cell subsets to DENV-specific humoral responses and revealed the sizable accumulation of CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ T cells in patients with dengue with warning signs and severity. These cells are potent B cell helpers, driving plasmablast differentiation and antibody production primarily through the IL-21 help axis. They produced higher levels of CD40L, IFN-γ, and IL-10 than did the pTfh (CXCR5+PD-1+) cells. Most of these effector T cells accumulate during the first week of acute disease and subsequently wane during recovery. However, these cells with a Th1-type phenotype persisted in patients who recovered from dengue for a long period of time.
Consistent with previous findings, we observed that antibodies against the structural proteins prM/E and non-structural protein NS1 are associated with severe outcomes.42 Anti-NS1 antibodies can mediate immunopathology by targeting complement components, platelets, and endothelial cells,43–45 and anti-prM/E antibodies can promote disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection.46 In fact, anti-prM/M/E antibodies are highly cross-reactive and produced by expanding plasmablasts from cross-reactive memory B cells in secondary dengue.14,18,47 Tfh cells seem not the only driver of these humoral responses in dengue, as their blood frequency or activation status remains unaltered in different disease outcomes despite progressive immune activation and severity. In line with our findings in an adult cohort, a study of Thai children also revealed no significant differences in pTfh frequency in DF and DHF patients.23 However, the role of GC-Tfh cells in promoting neutralizing antibodies in dengue cannot be excluded, as we detected significant blood levels of CXCL13 as a surrogate of GC activity. A rare frequency of GC-Tfh cells efficiently migrate from lymphoid organs to the circulation as pTfh cells,48 which can reflect a corresponding increase of pTfh cells in circulation. Certainly, in-depth studies are warranted to examine Tfh cells and GC activity in dengue. Indeed, in addition to pTfh cells, the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset also exhibited a positive association with in vivo plasmablast expansion and promoted plasmablast differentiation from memory B cells. These findings clearly suggested that B cell responses in dengue could be elicited in extrafollicular niches in addition to Tfh-dependent responses in B cell follicles. The predominance of the Tfh-independent B cell response was further supported by our finding that early generation of DENV-reactive antibodies in secondary dengue was sustained and positively associated with CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells but not with pTfh cells. In addition, the expanding plasmablasts in acute dengue expressed CXCR3 and CD71, which was also observed in COVID-19 and other acute viral diseases,49,50 indicating that plasmablast differentiation occurs under the influence of IFN-γ, a cytokine extensively secreted by CXCR5− PD-1+ T cells.
Remarkably, CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells constituted ~75% of the total activated CD4+ T cells during acute dengue. Single-cell analyses revealed that these cells in acute disease are highly proliferative and mostly acquire the Th1 transcriptional program.51,52 Certainly, CXCR5−PD-1+ Th1 cells constitutes a large population of effector cells in dengue, as indicated by their hyper- and large-expandability clonotypes. Interestingly, CXCR5−PD-1+ cells were identified as a transcriptionally and clonally distinct subset of cells in dengue compared with Tfh cells, which mostly reflects the transcriptional signatures of central memory T cells.53 Lymphoid tissue Tfh cells have been shown to exit the circulation via efferent lymphatics.48 Similarly, in HIV infection, CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells and Tfh cells in lymphoid tissue showed clonal similarities with their peripheral counterparts in blood.54 These findings clearly suggest that the blood clonotypes may not be entirely distinct from those in lymphoid tissues. Considering the extensive transcriptional and clonal differences, it is likely that the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset in dengue originates in lymphoid tissues from unique precursors, following differentiation pathways divergent from those of Tfh cells. Similarly, our results demonstrate that the Treg clonotypes in dengue are substantially more diverse than the pTfh or CXCR5−PD-1+ subsets.
Surprisingly, single-cell analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in the CXCR5−PD-1+ subset, with enrichment of cytotoxic (GZMA, GZMB, and PRF1) and helper signatures (IL21, SLAMF6, and MAF). These data indicated that the CXCR5−PD-1+ cell population included a subset with helper functions mostly enriched in IL-21-expressing cells, in addition to the subset harboring cytotoxic functions. A smaller fraction of cells coexpressing IL21 and GZMB was also present in the proliferating CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells that share a clonal lineage. However, these cells may represent intermediately differentiated cells that can further exhibit a terminally differentiated effector-memory-like phenotype. Indeed, PD-1-expressing cells in dengue include two distinct subsets that not only are distinct in their function but also have different developmental fates.
A phenotypically similar CXCR5−PD-1+ subset called peripheral helper T (Tph) cells was identified in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients.55–57 These cells exhibited activation and migration signatures consistent with our findings on the dengue cell subset. Additionally, in acute COVID-19 patients, Tph cells positively correlated with CXCR3-expressing plasmablasts in vivo, suggesting their role in regulating antibody responses via the IFN-γ axis.50 These recently emerging studies revealed that acute or chronic diseases with highly inflammatory conditions can alter the functions of non-follicular (CXCR5−) CD4+ T cells, where these T cells can acquire “B cell helper” functions in addition to their antiviral and cytotoxic functions. Our study revealed the existence of a distinct IL-21+ subset in the pool of PD-1-expressing cells that help B cells. It will be worthwhile to explore the role of the type 1 IFN pathway in promoting the differentiation of this subset.58,59
A strong expansion of plasmablasts in acute viral infections is associated with extrafollicular B cell responses.39 Extrafollicular B cell responses appear early and precede GC reaction to promote antibody responses.60 Extrafollicular B cells phenotypically belong to the DN (IgD−CD27−) subset with higher CD11c and CD19 but lower CD21 and CXCR5 expression.39,61 Consistently, we found phenotypically similar extrafollicular B cells in acute dengue, which strongly associated with CXCR5−PD-1+ T cells but not with Tfh cells. These results firmly suggest that the helper CXCR5−PD-1+ T cell subset may drive plasmablast differentiation from extrafollicular B cells and can be associated with the early production of large quantities of antibodies. Early antibody responses are highly evident in secondary dengue, where DENV serotype cross-reactive antibodies may lead to enhanced infection or targeting self-antigens (an autoimmune-like condition), causing aberrant activation and damage to platelets and endothelial cells.45,62 Moreover, early and exaggerated plasmablast responses in extrafollicular compartments may negatively impact de novo GC development at later stages by producing a large quantity of tumor necrosis factor α.63 This may limit the generation of serotype-specific neutralizing antibodies essential for controlling viral infection. Thus, CXCR5−PD-1+ T cell responses may provide a crucial link to the pathological generation of heightened antibody responses in severe dengue. Indeed, unlike blood, the limited presence of this memory subset in the lymphoid tissue of DENV seropositive individuals hints at the possibility of rapid expansion at the time of secondary infection. Interestingly, T cells induced in response to DENV infection express cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA), a skin-homing marker, and can migrate to the skin to exert their function.64 In addition to CLA, we also found several migration-associated genes65,66 on both helper and antiviral PD-1-expressing T cells that can promote their homing to extralymphoid inflamed tissues. It is possible that this peripheral helper subset contributes to robust plasmablasts and antibody responses in skin or inflamed tissues by helping B cells localize to these non-lymphoid sites. Future studies in the peripheral tissues of DENV-infected individuals probing the existence of such a T-B axis may provide further insight into our findings on the T cell determinants of humoral immunity in dengue.
In conclusion, our data essentially unveil the important immune axis of human response to dengue virus. We revealed the existence of a non-follicular B cell helper subset in dengue that is aberrantly accumulates in severe patients. This non-follicular helper subset shows clonotype and transcriptomic features distinct from those of pTfh cells and can be distinguished from the cytotoxic subset that coexists in the heterogeneous pool of PD-1-expressing CD4+ T cells. Importantly, for the first time, these findings provide insight into the existence of extrafollicular B cell responses as an anomalous process of humoral responses in dengue, which seems to be driven by this non-follicular helper subset. Our study established IL-21+ peripheral T cells as potential T cell determinants of the humoral response in dengue, which has implications for understanding disease biology and developing effective dengue vaccines.
Limitations of the study
This study is limited by a modest sample size and lack of simultaneous analyses of multiple cellular and serological analyses in all the subjects. Another limitation is the lack of direct evidence of IL-21+ T cell interactions with extrafollicular B cells in DENV-infected tissues of patients. While increased CXCL13 levels are suggestive of productive GC reactions, our study does not provide in-depth analyses of dengue Tfh cells, particularly GC-Tfh cells in lymphoid tissues of patients with acute dengue. Moreover, the study shows neutralizing potential of antibodies against DENV-2 but lacks investigation on cross-reactivity to other serotypes and their potential role in disease-enhancing mechanisms such as ADE. Moreover, the peptide pool used to assess the antigen-specific CD4+ T cells may not cover all epitopes in the viral genome. However, it includes most of the immunodominant epitopes, enabling the detection of virus-specific CD4+ T cells in the limited patient blood samples available. Certainly, future anti-gen-specific investigation of a larger prospective cohort will provide deeper insights into the T cell determinants of effective and durable humoral immunity to DENV.
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Nimesh Gupta (nimesh.gupta@nii.ac.in).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
The published article includes all the datasets generated during this study. The scripts are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14632965. The sequencing data for this study have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus and are publicly available as of the date of publication. Accession numbers are listed in the key resources table. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
KEY RESOURCES TABLE.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Antibodies | ||
|
| ||
| CD14, APC-eFluor 780, 61D3 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0149-42; RRID: AB_1834358 |
| CD16, APC-eFluor 780, eBioCB16 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0168-42; RRID: AB_11220086 |
| CD20, APC-eFluor 780, 2H7 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0209-42; RRID: AB_1272038 |
| CD8a, APC-eFluor 780, RPA-T8 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0088-42; RRID: AB_1272046 |
| FOXP3, PE, PCH101 | eBioscience | Cat# 12-4777-42; RRID: AB_1944444 |
| ICOS, FITC, C398.4A | eBioscience | Cat# 11-9949-82; RRID: AB_465458 |
| Ki67, PE, SolA15 | eBioscience | Cat# 12-5698-82; RRID: AB_11150954 |
| CCR6, PE, 11A9 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 559562; RRID: AB_397273 |
| CD14, PE, MΦP9 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562691; RRID: AB_2737725 |
| CD25, APC, M-A251 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555434; RRID: AB_398598 |
| CD25, PE-CF594, M-A251 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562403; RRID: AB_11151919 |
| CD38, PE/Cyanine5, HIT2 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555461; RRID: AB_395854 |
| CD45RO, FITC, UCHL1 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555492; RRID: AB_395883 |
| CXCR5, Alexa Fluor 647, RF8B2 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 558113; RRID: AB_2737606 |
| GZMB, PE, JES3-9D7 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561142; RRID: AB_10561690 |
| ICOS, PE-CF594, C398.4A | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565888; RRID: AB_2869727 |
| IFN-γ, PE-CF594, B27 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562392; RRID: AB_11153859 |
| IL-10, Brilliant Violet 421, JES3-9D7 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 564053; RRID: AB_2738566 |
| IL-21, Alexa Fluor 647, 3A3-N2.1 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 560493; RRID: AB_1645421 |
| CCR4, TotalSeq-C0071, L291H4 | BioLegend | Cat# 359425; RRID: AB_2800988 |
| CCR6, Alexa Fluor 488, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353414; RRID: AB_10916395 |
| CCR6, PE/Cyanine7, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353418; RRID: AB_10916518 |
| CCR6, TotalSeq-C0143, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353440; RRID: AB_2810563 |
| CD11c, PE, S-HCL-3 | BioLegend | Cat# 371504; RRID: AB_2616899 |
| CD19, Brilliant Violet 785, HIB19 | BioLegend | Cat# 302240; RRID: AB_2563442 |
| CD20, PE/Cyanine7, 2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 302312; RRID: AB_314259 |
| CD21, PE/Cyanine7, Bu32 | BioLegend | Cat# 354912; RRID: AB_2561576 |
| CD24, APC, ML5 | BioLegend | Cat# 311118; RRID: AB_1877150 |
| CD27, PE/Dazzle 594, M-T271 | BioLegend | Cat# 356422; RRID: AB_2564100 |
| CD27, TotalSeq-C0154, O323 | BioLegend | Cat# 302853; RRID: AB_2800747 |
| CD3, APC/Cyanine7, HIT3a | BioLegend | Cat# 300318; RRID: AB_314053 |
| CD38, Brilliant Violet 421, HIT2 | BioLegend | Cat# 303526; RRID: AB_10900230 |
| CD38, Brilliant Violet 510, HIT2 | BioLegend | Cat# 303540; RRID: AB_2616791 |
| CD4, Alexa Fluor 700, RPA-T4 | BioLegend | Cat# 300526; RRID: AB_493743 |
| CD40L, PE/Cyanine7, 24-31 | BioLegend | Cat# 310832; RRID: AB_2563016 |
| CD45RA, Brilliant Violet 785, HI100 | BioLegend | Cat# 304140; RRID: AB_2561369 |
| CD71, APC, CY1G4 | BioLegend | Cat# 334108; RRID: AB_10915138 |
| CD8a, APC, RPA-T8 | BioLegend | Cat# 301049; RRID: AB_2562054 |
| CXCR3, Alexa Fluor 488, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353710; RRID: AB_10962442 |
| CXCR3, Brilliant Violet711, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353732; RRID: AB_2563532 |
| CXCR3, TotalSeq-C0140, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353747; RRID: AB_2800949 |
| CXCR5, Brilliant Violet 421, J252D4 | BioLegend | Cat# 356920; RRID: AB_2562302 |
| CXCR5, TotalSeq-C0144, J252D4 | BioLegend | Cat# 356939; RRID: AB_2800968 |
| HLA-DR, Brilliant Violet 560, L243 | BioLegend | Cat# 307650; RRID: AB_2562544 |
| IgD, FITC, IA6-2 | BioLegend | Cat# 348206; RRID: AB_10613638 |
| OX40, PE/Cyanine7, Ber-ACT35 | BioLegend | Cat# 350012; RRID: AB_10901161 |
| PD-1, Brilliant Violet 421, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329920; RRID: AB_10900818 |
| PD-1, Brilliant Violet 711, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329928; RRID: AB_11218612 |
| PD-1, PE, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329906; RRID: AB_940481 |
| PD-1, PE/Dazzle 594, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329940; RRID: AB_2563658 |
| PD-1, TotalSeq-C0088, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329963; RRID: AB_2800862 |
| IL-2, Brilliant Violet 650, MQ1-17H12 | BioLegend | Cat# 500334; RRID: AB_11147166 |
| Human IL-10 antibody | R&D Systems | Cat# MAB2173-100; RRID: AB_3663041 |
| Human IL-4 antibody | R&D Systems | Cat# MAB204-100; RRID: AB_2126745 |
| IFN-γ mAb (1-D1K), purified | Mabtech | Cat# 3420-3-250; RRID: AB_907283 |
| IL-21 mAb (MT21.3m), biotin | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-6-250; RRID: AB_11178374 |
| IL-21 mAb (MT216G), purified | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-1-250; RRID: AB_3663042 |
| Goat anti-human Ig Fab, UNLB | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2085-01; RRID: AB_2795785 |
| Goat Anti-Human IgG Fc, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2014-05; RRID: AB_2795580 |
| Goat Anti-Human IgG, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2045-05; RRID: AB_2795676 |
| Goat, Anti-mouse IgG, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 1030-05; RRID: AB_2619742 |
| 4G2 antibody | N/A | N/A |
| Hashtag 2, TotalSeq-C0252, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394663; RRID: AB_2801032 |
| Hashtag 3, TotalSeq-C0253, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394665; RRID: AB_2801033 |
| Hashtag 4, TotalSeq-C0254, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394667; RRID: AB_2801034 |
|
| ||
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
|
| ||
| DENV serotype 2 virus, strain S-16803 | N/A | N/A |
|
| ||
| Biological samples | ||
|
| ||
| Blood samples from hospitalized dengue patients | AIIMS Hospital, Delhi, India | N/A |
| Blood samples from discharged convalescent dengue patients | N/A | N/A |
| Healthy donor blood buffy coats | AIIMS Hospital Blood Bank, Delhi, India | N/A |
| Paired blood and Lymphoid tissues | AIIMS Hospital, Delhi, India | N/A |
|
| ||
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
|
| ||
| Ficoll-Paque PLUS | Cytiva Life Sciences | Cat# 17144003 |
| RPMI 1640 | Cytiva Life Sciences | Cat# SH30027 |
| AIM-V medium (1X) | Gibco | Cat# 12055-091 |
| DPBS (10X) | Gibco | Cat# 14200-075 |
| Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | Cat# 10270-106 |
| RPMI 1640 + Glutamax-I (1X) | Gibco | Cat# 61870-036 |
| Pen-Strep | Gibco | Cat# 15140-122 |
| ACK lysis buffer | Gibco | Cat# A1049201 |
| EDTA (0.5M), pH 8.0 | Invitrogen | Cat# AM9260G |
| Fixable Viability Dye eFluor506 | Invitrogen | Cat# 65-0866-14 |
| Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 | Invitrogen | Cat# 65-0865-14 |
| Dnase I (1 mg/mL) | StemCell | Cat# 07900 |
| PI/AO stain | Logos Biosystems | Cat# F23001 |
| Concanavalin A | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# C0412 |
| DMSO | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# D2650 |
| DNase I (Roche) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 11284932001 |
| Ionomycin calcium Salt | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# I3909 |
| OPD tablet, 10mg | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P8287 |
| Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P8139 |
| Staphylococcal enterotoxin B | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# S4881 |
| Trypan Blue Solution (0.4%) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# T8154 |
| Tween 20 | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P1379 |
| Paraformaldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P6148 |
| Ethanol | Merck Millipore | Cat# 100983 |
| Hydrochloric acid, 37% | Merck Millipore | Cat# 100317 |
| GolgiPlug Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Brefeldin A) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555029 |
| Skim milk powder | HiMedia | Cat# GRM1254 |
| Buffer EB | Qiagen | Cat# 19086 |
| BCP/NBT-plus for ALP | Mabtech | Cat# 3650-10 |
| Streptavidin-ALP | Mabtech | Cat# 3310-10-1000 |
| Human IL-21R Fc chimera, CF | R&D Systems | Cat# 991-R2-100 |
| Dengue Virus Serotype 2 NS1 protein | Native Antigen, UK | DENV2-NS1-100 |
| Dengue Virus Serotype 2 VLP protein | Native Antigen, UK | DENV2-VLP-100 |
| DENV peptide megapool | Grifoni et al.29 | N/A |
| Carboxymethylcellulose | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# M0512-250 |
| 20% Paraformaldehyde aqueous solution | Electron Microscopy Sciences | Cat# 50-980-493 |
| Bovine Serum Albumin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# A7030-100G |
| Saponin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 47036-250G-F |
| TrueBlue Peroxidase Substrate | SeraCare | Cat# 5510-0030 |
|
| ||
| Critical commercial assays | ||
|
| ||
| Human IL-21 (ALP) ELISpot Kit | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-2A |
| Human IFN-γ/IL-10 FluoroSpot Kit | Mabtech | Cat# FSP-0107-02 |
| Dengue IgM Capture ELISA | Abbott | Cat# 01PE20 |
| Dengue IgG Capture ELISA | Abbott | Cat# 01PE10 |
| Dengue NS1 Ag Microlisa | J. Mitra & Co. | Cat# IR031096 |
| Anti-Dengue virus IgG ELISA Kit | Abcam | Cat# Ab108728 |
| Human CXCL13/BLC/BCA-1 Quantikine ELISA Kit | R&D Systems | Cat# DCX130 |
| Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set | Invitrogen | Cat# 00-5523-00 |
| CellTrace Violet Proliferation Kit | Invitrogen | Cat# C34557 |
| Qubit 1X dsDNA HS Assay Kit | Invitrogen | Cat# Q32851 |
| SPRIselect, 5mL | Beckman Coulter | Cat# B23317 |
| HS NGS Fragment Kit (1-6000bp) | Agilent | Cat# DNF-474-0500 |
| Capillary Storage Solution | Agilent | Cat# GP-440-0100 |
| Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5' Kit v2, 4 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000265 |
| Chromium Single Cell Human TCR Amplification Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000252 |
| Library Construction Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000190 |
| Chromium Next GEM Chip K Single Cell Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000287 |
| 5' Feature Barcode Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000256 |
| Dual Index Kit TN Set A, 96 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000250 |
| Dual Index Kit TT Set A, 96 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000215 |
| Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Screening Panel, 48-plex | Bio-Rad | Cat# 12007283 |
|
| ||
| Deposited data | ||
|
| ||
| Single-cell RNAseq data | Gene Expression Omnibus | GSE280258 |
| Scripts | Zenodo | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14632965 |
|
| ||
| Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
|
| ||
| Vero | ATCC | Cat# CCL-81; RRID: CVCL_0059 |
| D1-4G2-4-15 | ATCC | Cat# HB-112; RRID: CVCL_J890 |
|
| ||
| Software and algorithms | ||
|
| ||
| FlowJo V10.3.0 | FlowJo, LLC | https://www.flowjo.com/ |
| AID Elispot v7.0 | AID GmbH | https://www.elispot.com/ |
| SkanIt v6.1 | Thermo Scientific | https://www.thermofisher.com/ |
| Bio-Plex Manager v6.2 | Bio-Rad | https://www.bio-rad.com/ |
| Prism V8.4.3 | GraphPad | https://www.graphpad.com/ |
| Cell Ranger V7.0.1 | 10x Genomics | https://www.10xgenomics.com/ |
| Seurat V4.3.0 | Stuart et al.28 | https://www.satijalab.org/seurat |
| R V4.3.1 | R Core Team | https://www.r-project.org/ |
| MAST | Finak et al.67 | https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/MAST.html |
| fgsea | Korotkevich et al.68 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/fgsea.html |
| Monocle3 V1.3.1 | Trapnell et al.69 | https://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/monocle3/ |
| scRepertoire V1.10.0 | Borcherding et al.70 | https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/scRepertoire.html |
| circlize | Gu et al.71 | https://github.com/jokergoo/circlize |
| UpSetR | Conway et al.72 | https://github.com/hms-dbmi/UpSetR |
|
| ||
| Other | ||
|
| ||
| 96 Well Round (U) Bottom Plate | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 163320 |
| Flat-bottom Immuno 96-well MaxiSorp Plates | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 442404 |
| Nunc MicroWell 96-well, Flat-bottom Microplate | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 136101 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 2-20 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078535 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 2-200 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078551 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 50 - 1,000 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078578 |
| MultiScreen IP Filter Plate | Millipore | Cat# MSIPS4510 |
| MultiScreen IP-FL Filter Plate | Millipore | Cat# S5EJ104I07 |
STAR★METHODS
Detailed methods are provided in the online version of this paper and include the following:
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Ethics approval statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Boards of the National Institute of Immunology (NII) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India. Informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients and healthy donors.
Dengue patients and samples
A prospective cohort of 170 adult patients with acute dengue hospitalized in the emergency and admission wards of AIIMS Hospital, New Delhi, between September and November 2017, 2018, and 2019 was enrolled in the study. The median age of the participants was 27 (IQR, 20–36) years, and 107 were male (63%). Blood samples were collected from patients with acute dengue during their hospitalization, with a median of 6 (IQR, 5–8) days of illness, and some of them (n = 32) were longitudinally followed postdischarge during the convalescence period, with a median of 34 (IQR, 24–42) days after the onset of symptoms. A small group of 7 patients was also longitudinally followed long-term, approximately 10 months after the onset of symptoms (Table S3). In all patients, acute DENV infection was confirmed by detection of the DENV NS1 antigen and/or by serological evidence, DENV-specific immunoglobulins, IgM and IgG. Clinical, demographic, biochemical, and comorbidity data are provided in Tables S1 and S2. Patients with unconfirmed dengue or other infections (e.g., malaria) were excluded from the study. According to WHO guidelines, acute dengue samples were categorized as dengue ± warning signs (WS) or severe dengue.27
Healthy donors
Peripheral blood buffy coats from healthy adult donors were collected from the AIIMS Hospital Blood Bank, New Delhi, India, between March 2017 and January 2020. Almost all the healthy donors were adult males (99%), with a median age of 30 (IQR, 26–36) years (Tables S1 and S4). Blood donor volunteers were free of any flu-like symptoms and had negative reports for infectious markers, HBV, HCV, HIV, and syphilis according to blood bank analyses.
LN tissue donors
Paired blood and lymphoid tissues (LNs and adenoids) were obtained from patients who underwent ENT-related surgical excision for biopsy analysis of malignant tumors/metastases. DENV virus exposure in these individuals was confirmed by anti-DENV IgG ELISA (Table S1).
METHOD DETAILS
PBMC and plasma processing
All the peripheral blood samples were processed within 4 h of collection to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma. Whole-blood samples were collected in 10 mL K2 EDTA vacutainers for all dengue participants or in 350 mL CPD blood bags for all healthy blood donors. Whole blood was then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min to separate the plasma and cellular fractions. Then, 1–2 mL of plasma from the top was carefully removed from the remaining cell fractions and stored in aliquots at −80°C. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), cryopreserved in several aliquots of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) DMSO (Thermo Fisher) and stored in liquid nitrogen until further analysis.
Dengue diagnosis and classification
Acute dengue infection was confirmed by detection of the DENV NS1 antigen or DENV-specific antibodies and IgM and IgG in the plasma samples. Table S2 depicts the timing of all these tests. The DENV NS1 antigen was detected and quantified by dengue NS1 sandwich ELISA (J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd., India). DENV-specific IgM and IgG antibodies were quantified by Panbio Dengue IgM (01PE20) and IgG (01PE10) capture ELISA kits (Abott). Samples were considered positive or negative according to the manufacturer’s instructions according to the cutoff units. Equivocal or negative results were repeated when possible with consecutive sampling during hospitalization. Primary and secondary-dengue patients were classified as primary if the IgM/IgG OD ratio was > 1.2 (at a dilution of 1/100) or secondary if the OD ratio was ≤ 1.2 based on WHO guidelines. Healthy donor (HD) blood bank volunteers who were negative according to Panbio dengue IgG (01PE10) capture ELISA were selected as the HD control group. A highly sensitive Abcam human anti-DENV IgG ELISA kit (ab108728) was used to determine DENV seropositivity in HD volunteers.
DENV peptide pool
In all the autologous experiments, a DENV peptide pool (megapool) consisting of 180 different MHC class II binding peptides was used to stimulate antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. This megapool of CD4 T cell reactive peptides was specifically designed to cover all four DENV (DENV1–4) serotypes that bind to a wide range of HLA types and was previously validated by intracellular cytokine staining assays.29
Flow cytometry and cell sorting
For phenotyping and functional analysis, cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed and revived by washing them with 10 mL of prewarmed RPMI 1640 (Cytiva Life Sciences) and treated with DNase I (StemCell Technologies) at 100 μg/mL for 15 min at 37°C. The revived PBMCs used for downstream analysis were > 80% viable, as assessed by acridine orange (AO) and propidium iodide (PI) staining using an automatic LUNA-FL cell counter (LogoS Biosystems, Inc., USA). For direct ex vivo immuno-phenotyping of PBMCs, 1×106 PBMCs were surface stained with an antibody cocktail in FACS buffer (PBS with 2% FBS) for 1 h at 4°C in the dark. Following surface staining, the cells were washed with FACS buffer, fixed and permeabilized for 30 min at 4°C in the dark using an eBioscience Foxp3/transcription factor buffer kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following fixation/permeabilization, the cells were washed with 1x permeabilization buffer and stained with intracellular/intranuclear antibodies in permeabilization buffer for 1 h at 4°C in the dark. The cells were subsequently washed twice with 1x permeabilization buffer and resuspended in 200 μL of FACS buffer. All the samples were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software v10.3.0. A list of the antibodies used for immunophenotyping of T and B cells is provided in Table S7A.
For the ELISPOT/FluoroSpot assays, PBMCs were surface stained with the anti-human antibodies mentioned in Table S7B in FACS buffer for 1 h. Memory CD45RO+CXCR5+ or CD45RO+ CXCR5− cells were sorted via FACS from live CD14−CD16−CD20− CD4+ cells. A pool of CD20+ B cells and CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes was sorted together to serve as antigen-presenting cells (APCs). For the autologous coculture assay, PBMCs were surface stained as described above with the antibody cocktail shown in Table S7B. First, monocytes and B cells were sorted from live PBMCs as CD14+CD20− and CD14−CD20+, respectively. Naive and memory B cells were sorted from CD20+ B cells as CD20+CD27− and CD20+CD27+, respectively. Similarly, memory and naive CD4+ T cells were sorted from live CD14−CD20− PBMCs as CD4+CD45RO+ and CD4+CD45RO−, respectively. Among the CD45RO+CD4+ T cells, CD25-expressing Treg cells were excluded prior to the sorting of memory cell subsets. The four memory cell subsets were then sorted based on the expression of CXCR5 and PD-1 in CD45RO+CD25− cells. All the cell types were collected in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 50% FBS during FACS sorting. FACS was performed on a BD FACSAria Fusion flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) at medium flow rates using a 70 μm nozzle. For the IL-21 and GZMB costaining experiments, the CXCR5−PD-1+ CD4+CD45RO+ T cell subset was subjected to FACS using the same strategy as mentioned above.
Activation-induced cell marker (AIM) assay
Antigen-specific CD4+ T cell analysis was performed using the highly sensitive AIM assay established by Crotty’s laboratory.73 In this assay, cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, revived as described previously and resuspended in AIM-V medium (Gibco) in the presence of DENV peptides (DENVpep;1 μg/mL) in a 96-well U bottom plate (Thermo Scientific) at 1×106 PBMCs per well. The cells were incubated for 18–20 h in standard culture conditions in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Stimulation of cells with an equimolar amount of DMSO (vehicle; Sigma–Aldrich) was used as a negative control, and stimulation with concanavalin A (2 μg/mL; Sigma–Aldrich) was included as a positive control. After incubation, the cells were surface stained with an antibody cocktail in FACS buffer for 1 h in the dark at 4°C. The cells were then washed with FACS buffer and fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (freshly prepared in 1x PBS; Sigma–Aldrich) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. After fixation, the cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and resuspended in 200 μL of FACS buffer. The details of the antibodies used in the AIM assay are listed in Table S7C.
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay
For the intracellular cytokine analysis, 1×106 PBMCs per well were stimulated in the presence of DENVpep (2.5 μg/mL) or an equimolar amount of DMSO (vehicle control) in a 96-well U bottom plate for 6 h in standard culture conditions. GolgiPlug containing brefeldin A (BD Biosciences) was added to the cells 2 h after DENVpep addition. For polyclonal stimulation of PBMCs, 0.5×106 cells were stimulated with PMA (25 ng/mL; Sigma–Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL; Sigma–Aldrich) in the presence of GolgiPlug containing brefeldin A for 4 h. After incubation, the cells were stained with surface antibodies and intracellular cytokine antibodies following the protocol described in the “Flow cytometry” section. The antibodies used in the ICS assay are listed in Table S7C. In another experiment analyzing IL-21 and GZMB in FACS-sorted CXCR5−PD-1+ CD4+ T cells, 6 × 104 T cells per well were cocultured with CD14+ monocytes at a 1:2 ratio and polyclonally activated with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB; Sigma–Aldrich) at 1 μg/mL for 48 h. After activation, the cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin in the presence of GolgiPlug containing brefeldin A for 4 h. The cells were stained with intracellular cytokine antibodies (against human CD40L, IFN-γ, IL-21 and GZMB) as previously described. The antibodies used in this study are listed in Table S7C.
ELISPOT and Fluorospot assays
ELISPOT was performed to detect IL-21-secreting cells among FACS-sorted CD45RO+CXCR5+ and CD45RO+CXCR5− CD4+ T cells. An ELISPOT plate (MSIPS4510; Millipore) was charged with 35% ethanol (Merck Millipore) and coated with the mAb MT216G (10 μg/mL; Mabtech) overnight at 4°C. The plate was washed and blocked with AIM-V medium containing 10% FBS for at least 30 min at room temperature (RT). CD4+ T cells (2×104 cells per well) were cocultured with a pool of CD20+ B cells and CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes (4×104 cells per well) in AIM-V medium. The cells were stimulated with DENVpep (2 μg/mL) or an equimolar amount of DMSO for 24 h under standard culture conditions. For polyclonal stimulation, cells were stimulated with SEB (1 μg/mL). The plate was washed 5 times with PBS and incubated with the mAb MT21.3 m-biotin (0.25 mg/mL; Mabtech) for 2 h at RT. After incubation, the plate was developed according to the Human IL-21 ELISPOT (3540-2A) manufacturer’s instructions. For FluoroSpot detection of IFN-γ-secreting cells, an IPFL plate (Mabtech) was charged with 35% ethanol and coated with the mAb 1-D1K (15 μg/mL; Mabtech) overnight. The plate was blocked, and the cells were cultured as described above. Spots were detected with the BAM-conjugated mAb 7-B6-1 (Mabtech) diluted 1:200. The reaction was developed following the kit protocol (FS-0107; Mabtech). IL-21 and IFN-γ spot counts were read on a vSpot Spectrum ELISPOT/FluoroSpot reader (AID GmbH) using AID Elispot software v7.x.
DENV-reactive IgG ELISA
An in-house-developed indirect ELISA was performed to measure DENV-reactive IgG antibodies in the plasma samples. F-bottom immuno-96-well plates (Thermo Fisher) were coated with 1 μg/mL recombinant DENV-2 NS1 protein or DENV-2 virus-like particles consisting of prM, M and E proteins (Native Antigen, UK) overnight at 4°C. The next day, the plates were washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma–Aldrich) and blocked with 3% skim milk powder (SMP; Himedia) in PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20 for 2 h at RT. The plasma was diluted in PBS containing 1% SMP and 0.05% Tween 20 starting at a dilution of 1:1000, followed by a serial dilution of 1:3. Diluted plasma was subsequently added to the plates and incubated for 1.5 h. The plasma was heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min before being added to the plates. After incubation, the plates were washed 5 times with PBS-0.05% Tween 20, and secondary goat anti-human IgG antibody conjugated with HRP (Southern Biotech) was added at a 1:4000 dilution and incubated for 1 h. The plates were washed 5 times with PBS-0.05% Tween 20. The reaction mixture was incubated with OPD peroxidase substrate (Sigma) for 10 min at RT in the dark. The reaction was stopped with 2 N hydrochloric acid (HCl; Merck Millipore). The plates were read on a MultiskanGO ELISA reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 492 nm using SkanIt Software v6.1. The optical density (OD) values of the samples were background-subtracted from the blank OD values of PBS-1% SMP and 0.05% Tween 20.
CXCL13 ELISA
A human CXCL13/BLC/BCA-1 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) was used to measure the CXCL13 cytokine concentration in plasma samples as a circulating GC marker. Freshly thawed plasma samples were subjected to this assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
FRNT neutralization assay
DENV neutralization titer was determined by focus reduction neutralization titer (FRNT) assay. Briefly, Vero (ATCC# CCL-81) cells were seeded at 20,000 per well in 96 white flat-bottom plate (Nunc # 136101) and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. Next day, plasma samples were heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min. Further, 3-fold serial dilutions (starting dilution 1:10) of plasma samples were prepared and mixed with DENV-2 virus with 100–150 FFU, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After incubation, cell monolayers were washed with 1x DPBS and a mixture was added to the cell monolayer and incubated for 90 min at 37°C. The mixture was removed and replaced with 1% Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) overlay media and incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron microscopy #50-980-493) for 30 min at RT. Later, cells were washed with 1x DPBS, blocked and permeabilized using blocking permeabilization buffer (0.1% BSA plus 0.1% saponin) for 30 min at RT. The cells were subsequently stained with the primary antibody 4G2 (2 μg/mL, purified from 4G2 hybridoma) for 2 h at RT. Cells were washed with 1x DPBS and stained with secondary antibody anti-mouse HRP conjugated at 1:2000 dilution (Southern Biotech #1030-05) for 1 h at RT. Following incubation, cells were washed with 1x DPBS, focus was developed using True Blue Substrate (KPL# 5510-0030), and spots were read on AID GmbH ELISPOT reader using AID Elispot software v7.x. Neutralization 50 was calculated based on non-linear regression analysis using Prism v.10 (GraphPad software).
Cytokine multiplex bead assay
Cytokines in the plasma samples were quantified using a human cytokine 48-plex screening panel (Bio-Plex; Bio-Rad). The plasma samples were stored at −80°C. The cytokine immunoassay was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. The plates were read on a Bio-Plex 200 reader (Bio-Rad) using Bio-Plex Manager v6.2.
Lymphoid tissue processing
Lymphoid tissue was processed to generate a single-cell suspension on the same day as the tissue sample was excised. The tissue was transferred to a 90 mm Petri dish containing warm complete RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Pen-Strep (Gibco). Excess fat and connective tissue were removed, and the tissue was then minced manually using dissecting scalpels to obtain ~1–2 mm3 pieces. The minced tissue suspension was passed through a 70 μm cell strainer (Corning), and the larger remaining cells were triturated into fine pieces using a 2 mL syringe piston. The minced tissue suspension was centrifuged at 100x g at RT for 10 min. The cells were treated with ACK lysis buffer (Gibco) to remove red cell contamination and passed through a 40 μm cell strainer to obtain a uniform single-cell suspension. The cells were again centrifuged at 400x g at RT for 10 min and resuspended in complete RPMI medium. Cell count and viability were assessed as described previously. The cells were cryopreserved in several aliquots in FBS containing 10% (v/v) DMSO and stored in liquid nitrogen for later analysis.
Autologous T-B cocultures
B cell helper function was assessed by an efficient ex vivo T-B coculture setting previously validated in SARS-CoV-2-specific memory CD4+ T cells by our group.32 Briefly, FACS-generated purified CD4+ T cells (6×104 cells/well) were cocultured with autologous CD20+ B cells (6×104 cells/well) in the presence of autologous CD14+ monocytes (3×104 cells/well) in AIM-V medium in a 96-well U bottom plate for 9 days under standard culture conditions. CD4+ T cells were stimulated with 1 μg/mL DENVpep or an equimolar amount of DMSO (vehicle control), and no exogenous cytokines or culture media were added/replaced throughout the duration of cocultures. For blocking experiments, IL-21R-Fc (5 μg/mL; R&D Systems), the α-IL-10 mAb (5 μg/mL; R&D Systems) and the α-IL-4 mAb (10 μg/mL; R&D Systems) were added to DENVpep-stimulated cocultures. After 9 days of coculture, viable cells were counted using a LUNA-FL cell counter, and plasmablast phenotyping was performed via flow cytometry. The antibodies used in the coculture assay are listed in Table S7C. The supernatants were collected from the cocultures and stored in aliquots at −20°C. DENV-reactive IgG antibodies (anti-NS1 and anti-prM/M/E) were detected in the undiluted supernatants via an in-house developed ELISA method as previously described.
Single-cell RNAseq and TCRseq assays (10x genomics)
For single-cell RNAseq and TCRseq analysis, cryopreserved PBMCs from 3 acute patients with dengue were thawed and processed as described previously. The cells were washed with 20 mL of PBS-2 mM EDTA buffer. A total of 3×106 PBMCs were blocked with 10% heat-inactivated human plasma by incubating for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were then surface stained with fluorochrome-tagged and TotalSeq-C (BioLegend) anti-human antibodies, as listed in Tables S7B and S7D, for 1 h at 4°C according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PBMCs from each patient were also stained with anti-human Hashtag antibodies (BioLegend) before pooling. For FACS sorting of activated CD4+ T cells, ICOS+CD38+ cells were gated on CD4+ T cells as shown in Figure 6A and collected in separate tubes with RPMI 1640 medium. FACS-sorted ICOS+CD38+ CD4+ T cells from three patients were pooled together in equal numbers and resuspended at a density of 1100 cells/μL with >90% viability. The cells were processed for gel bead-in-emulsion (GEM) generation, barcoding and cDNA preparation (10x Genomics) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Single-cell RNA sequencing library preparation was performed using Chromium Next GEM Single-Cell 5′ Reagent Kit v2.0 (Dual Index) with immune profiling (VDJ) and cell surface protein feature barcode technology (10x Genomics). The initial cDNA amplification was performed with 13 amplification cycles. After amplification, the cDNA pellet was used to amplify the VDJ T cell receptor (TCR), after which the VDJ library was prepared via 8 cycles of amplification; preparation of the 5′ gene expression library was performed via 14 cycles of amplification. A cell surface protein (CSP) library was generated from the amplified cDNA supernatant after 8 amplification cycles. The quality and concentration of the cDNA libraries were assessed using the 5200 Fragment Analyzer system (Agilent) with an Agilent DNF-474 HS NGS Fragment Kit and a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo-Fisher) with a dsDNA HS assay kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. In addition, the insert size of the library was determined using a TapeStation 4150 (Agilent) and an Agilent high-sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape assay. The three libraries were pooled in molar concentrations according to a sequencing depth of ~30,000 reads/cell for 5′ gene expression and ~5,000 reads/cell for the VDJ and CSP libraries and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (150 bp, paired-end) with the following parameters: read1 – 26 cycles; read2 – 90 cycles; and i7 and i5 indexes - 10 cycles.
Single-cell transcriptome analysis
Single-cell RNA sequencing (FASTQ) data from the 5′ RNA expression, VDJ-TCR and CSP libraries were simultaneously processed using the cellranger multipipeline of Cell Ranger software v7.0.1 (10x Genomics). Unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts were assigned to the cell barcodes and mapped to reference genomes: GRCh38-2020-A for RNA, GRCh38-alts-ensembl-7.0.0 for VDJ-TCR, and TotalSeq-C (BioLegend) feature barcodes for CSP to generate a filtered RNA/CSP count matrix and filtered VDJ-TCR contig annotations. To demultiplex the cells from all three patients, raw reads from the 5° RNA expression and multiplexing capture (CSP) libraries were again processed with a cellranger multipipeline to generate a sample-filtered RNA count matrix for each sample. Cell barcodes from all three patients were assigned to their respective patient IDs, and unassigned or doublets were discarded during demultiplexing. Next, the demultiplexed filtered count data from all patients were merged and analyzed via the R platform-based Seurat v4.3.0 package. The low-quality cells and empty droplets/cell doublets were removed by filtering out the cells expressing 〈 1000 or > 50,000 UMIs, 〈 500 or > 7,500 genes, > 7% mitochondrial UMIs, or 〈 7% ribosomal UMIs. A total of 4,361 filtered cells were recovered (81.33%) for downstream analysis. The count data were log-transformed and normalized (by a factor of 10,000) per cell using the default settings in Seurat, and the 3000 most variable genes were selected by the variance stabilizing transformation (vst) method.28 The top genes were subjected to scaling and centered after regressing out the following variables: UMIs, genes, mitochondrial percentage, cell cycle genes (differences in S and G2M scores calculated by the CellCycleScoring function) and other confounding factors, gene signatures of dissociation-induced stress74 and hypoxia75 calculated by the AddModuleScore function. Principal component analysis (PCA) was subsequently performed, and the top 30 principal components (PCs) were selected based on the standard deviation of the PCs in the “elbow plot”. Clustering was performed using the FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions76 with the default settings in Seurat and a resolution of 0.8. Visualizing the clusters via the UMAP approach resulted in clustering of the cells in a highly donor-specific manner. To minimize donor-based bias in clustering, data integration was performed using an anchor-based CCA method.28 For CSP expression, filtered CSP count data for 4,361 filtered cells were assembled via the same Seurat procedure. The CSP count data were normalized using the centered log-ratio (CLR) method. For visualization of the normalized data, UMAP plots, feature plots, scatterplots, and violin plots were generated using visualization methods in Seurat.
Differential gene expression and GSEA
Differential gene expression analysis between two clusters or cell groups was performed by the FindMarkers function of the Seurat package, and the Model-based Analysis of Single-cell Transcriptomics (MAST) test parameter was applied.67 A gene was considered differentially expressed when the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) adjusted p value was 〈0.05 and the log2|fold change| was > 0.25. Graphical visualization of DEGs, such as heatmaps, dot plots, and volcano plots, was performed using Seurat functions or ggplot2. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) scores were calculated by the fgsea package for the cluster-enriched ranked gene sets.68 The signature gene sets used for GSEA of cytotoxic CD477 and interferon response78 are given in Table S6C.
Single-cell trajectory analysis
Monocle3 v1.3.169 was used to construct a branched trajectory through the cells based on the normalized count data from Seurat analysis. The cell trajectory was projected on a single partition of cells from all UMAP clusters generated in Seurat.
Single-cell TCR clonotype analysis
Filtered VDJ-TCR contig annotations were previously obtained using the cellranger multi pipeline in Cell Ranger v7.0.1 software (10x Genomics). VDJ-TCR annotations were processed with the scRepertoire package70 (v1.10.0) to combine the TCR genes from the same cell barcodes. Unique TCR clonotypes were then counted and aggregated into RNA/CSP count data using the combineExpression function of the scRepertoire. A total of 3,935 cells out of 4,361 cells were recovered for clonotype analysis. Cells with more than 1 clone (clonal size > 1) were called clonally expanded, and their clonal sizes, single, small, medium, large, and hyperexpandable, were visualized on the UMAP plot. Clonal overlap of cells in two or more clusters was depicted using the tool circlize71 or UpSetR.72
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The data processing, methods and codes used are described in the respective sections of the Methods. The statistical details of the experiments are indicated in the respective Figure legends or methods. All the statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software v.10. The data were plotted in scatterplots and are presented as the median ± interquartile range (IQR). The data plotted in bar plots are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were performed using two-tailed Student’s t tests, nonparametric tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with a p value of 〈0.05 indicating statistical significance. Multiple comparisons were performed using ANOVA or nonparametric tests, the Friedman test for matched comparisons or the Kruskal–Wallis test for unmatched comparisons. The specific p values are depicted in the respective Figure panels.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
CXCR5−PD-1+CD4+ cells accumulate in severe dengue, featuring “helper” and “cytotoxic” subsets
IL-21+ helper T cells distinct from Tfh cells drive B cell help in dengue via IL-21 signaling
Peripheral IL-21+ helper cells acquire memory and home to tissues
IL-21+ helper T cells drive humoral response in dengue through extrafollicular niche
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to the participants for their generous support of this study. This work was financially supported by SERB, a DST grant (ECR/2016/001814), and a DBT grant (BT/NBM0099/02/18) to the NG and NII core grants. Further support was provided by NIH contract 75N9301900065 (to A.S. and D.W.) and NIH grant U01 (U01AI141995-03) to A.S.
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
N.G. and A.A. are listed as inventors on patents submitted by the National Institute of Immunology and cover the use of the “T cell qualitative assay” for vaccine evaluation. N.G. has filed patent protection for the use of dengue virus Tfh epitopes identified in the Indian population. D.W. is a consultant for Moderna. La Jolla Institute for Immunology has filed for patent protection for various aspects of T cell epitopes and vaccine design work. A.S. is a consultant for GritstoneBio, FlowPharma, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Qiagen, Fortress, Gilead, Sanofi, Merck, RiverVest, MedaCorp, Turnstone, NAVaccine Institute, Emervax, GersonLehrman, and Guggenheim.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115366.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, et al. (2013). The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496, 504–507. 10.1038/nature12060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Hunsperger E, Kroeger A, Margolis HS, Martίnez E, et al. (2010). Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, S7–S16. 10.1038/nrmicro2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Halstead SB, Nimmannitya S, and Cohen SN (1970). Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. IV. Relation of disease severity to antibody response and virus recovered. Yale J. Biol. Med. 42, 311–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Halstead SB, Chow JS, and Marchette NJ (1973). Immunological enhancement of dengue virus replication. Nat. New Biol. 243, 24–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sangkawibha N, Rojanasuphot S, Ahandrik S, Viriyapongse S, Jatanasen S, Salitul V, Phanthumachinda B, and Halstead SB (1984). Risk factors in dengue shock syndrome: a prospective epidemiologic study in Rayong, Thailand. I. The 1980 outbreak. Am. J. Epidemiol. 120, 653–669. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burke DS, Nisalak A, Johnson DE, and Scott RM (1988). A prospective study of dengue infections in Bangkok. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 38, 172–180. 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thein S, Aung MM, Shwe TN, Aye M, Zaw A, Aye K, Aye KM, and Aaskov J (1997). Risk factors in dengue shock syndrome. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 56, 566–572. 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.56.566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dejnirattisai W, Jumnainsong A, Onsirisakul N, Fitton P, Vasanawathana S, Limpitikul W, Puttikhunt C, Edwards C, Duangchinda T, Supasa S, et al. (2010). Cross-reacting antibodies enhance dengue virus infection in humans. Science 328, 745–748. 10.1126/science.1185181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guzman MG, Alvarez M, and Halstead SB (2013). Secondary infection as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: an historical perspective and role of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. Arch. Virol. 158, 1445–1459. 10.1007/s00705-013-1645-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Salje H, Cummings DAT, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Katzelnick LC, Lessler J, Klungthong C, Thaisomboonsuk B, Nisalak A, Weg A, Ellison D, et al. (2018). Reconstruction of antibody dynamics and infection histories to evaluate dengue risk. Nature 557, 719–723. 10.1038/s41586-018-0157-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anderson KB, Gibbons RV, Cummings DAT, Nisalak A, Green S, Libraty DH, Jarman RG, Srikiatkhachorn A, Mammen MP, Darunee B, et al. (2014). A shorter time interval between first and second dengue infections is associated with protection from clinical illness in a school-based cohort in Thailand. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 360–368. 10.1093/infdis/jit436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith SA, Zhou Y, Olivarez NP, Broadwater AH, de Silva AM, and Crowe JE Jr. (2012). Persistence of circulating memory B cell clones with potential for dengue virus disease enhancement for decades following infection. J. Virol. 86, 2665–2675. 10.1128/JVI.06335-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hadinegoro SR, Arredondo-Garcίa JL, Capeding MR, Deseda C, Chotpitayasunondh T, Dietze R, Muhammad Ismail HIH, Reynales H, Limkittikul K, Rivera-Medina DM, et al. (2015). Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of a Dengue Vaccine in Regions of Endemic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1195–1206. 10.1056/NEJMoa1506223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wrammert J, Onlamoon N, Akondy RS, Perng GC, Polsrila K, Chandele A, Kwissa M, Pulendran B, Wilson PC, Wittawatmongkol O, et al. (2012). Rapid and massive virus-specific plasmablast responses during acute dengue virus infection in humans. J. Virol. 86, 2911–2918. 10.1128/JVI.06075-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garcia-Bates TM, Cordeiro MT, Nascimento EJM, Smith AP, Soares de Melo KM, McBurney SP, Evans JD, Marques ETA Jr., and Barratt-Boyes SM (2013). Association between magnitude of the virus-specific plasmablast response and disease severity in dengue patients. J. Immunol. 190, 80–87. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Simon-Loriere E, Duong V, Tawfik A, Ung S, Ly S, Casademont I, Prot M, Courtejoie N, Bleakley K, Buchy P, et al. (2017). Increased adaptive immune responses and proper feedback regulation protect against clinical dengue. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal5088. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal5088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dejnirattisai W, Wongwiwat W, Supasa S, Zhang X, Dai X, Rouvinski A, Jumnainsong A, Edwards C, Quyen NTH, Duangchinda T, et al. (2015). A new class of highly potent, broadly neutralizing antibodies isolated from viremic patients infected with dengue virus. Nat. Immunol. 16, 170–177. 10.1038/ni.3058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Priyamvada L, Cho A, Onlamoon N, Zheng NY, Huang M, Kovalenkov Y, Chokephaibulkit K, Angkasekwinai N, Pattanapanyasat K, Ahmed R, et al. (2016). B Cell Responses during Secondary Dengue Virus Infection Are Dominated by Highly Cross-Reactive, Memory-Derived Plasmablasts. J. Virol. 90, 5574–5585. 10.1128/JVI.03203-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weiskopf D, Bangs DJ, Sidney J, Kolla RV, De Silva AD, de Silva AM, Crotty S, Peters B, and Sette A (2015). Dengue virus infection elicits highly polarized CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD4+ T cells associated with protective immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4256–E4263. 10.1073/pnas.1505956112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tian Y, Seumois G, De-Oliveira-Pinto LM, Mateus J, Herrera-de la Mata S, Kim C, Hinz D, Goonawardhana NDS, de Silva AD, Premawansa S, et al. (2019). Molecular Signatures of Dengue Virus-Specific IL-10/IFN-gamma Co-producing CD4 T Cells and Their Association with Dengue Disease. Cell Rep. 29, 4482–4495.e4. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ueno H (2016). T follicular helper cells in human autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 43, 24–31. 10.1016/j.coi.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Crotty S (2019). T Follicular Helper Cell Biology: A Decade of Discovery and Diseases. Immunity 50, 1132–1148. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haltaufderhyde K, Srikiatkhachorn A, Green S, Macareo L, Park S, Kalayanarooj S, Rothman AL, and Mathew A (2018). Activation of Peripheral T Follicular Helper Cells During Acute Dengue Virus Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 1675–1685. 10.1093/infdis/jiy360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mathew A, West K, Kalayanarooj S, Gibbons RV, Srikiatkhachorn A, Green S, Libraty D, Jaiswal S, and Rothman AL (2011). B cell responses during primary and secondary dengue virus infections in humans. J. Infect. Dis. 204, 1514–1522. 10.1093/infdis/jir607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zompi S, Montoya M, Pohl MO, Balmaseda A, and Harris E (2012). Dominant cross-reactive B cell response during secondary acute dengue virus infection in humans. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 6, e1568. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rouers A, Chng MHY, Lee B, Rajapakse MP, Kaur K, Toh YX, Sathiakumar D, Loy T, Thein TL, Lim VWX, et al. (2021). Immune cell phenotypes associated with disease severity and long-term neutralizing antibody titers after natural dengue virus infection. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100278. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.WHO (2009). Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition (WHO/TDR). https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44188. [PubMed]
- 28.Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM 3rd, Hao Y, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, and Satija R (2019). Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grifoni A, Angelo MA, Lopez B, O’Rourke PH, Sidney J, Cerpas C, Balmaseda A, Silveira CGT, Maestri A, Costa PR, et al. (2017). Global Assessment of Dengue Virus-Specific CD4(+) T Cell Responses in Dengue-Endemic Areas. Front. Immunol. 8, 1309. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alcon S, Talarmin A, Debruyne M, Falconar A, Deubel V, and Flamand M (2002). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific to Dengue virus type 1 nonstructural protein NS1 reveals circulation of the antigen in the blood during the acute phase of disease in patients experiencing primary or secondary infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 376–381. 10.1128/JCM.40.02.376-381.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Havenar-Daughton C, Lindqvist M, Heit A, Wu JE, Reiss SM, Kendric K, Bélanger S, Kasturi SP, Landais E, Akondy RS, et al. (2016). CXCL13 is a plasma biomarker of germinal center activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2702–2707. 10.1073/pnas.1520112113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ansari A, Sachan S, Jit BP, Sharma A, Coshic P, Sette A, Weiskopf D, and Gupta N (2022). An efficient immunoassay for the B cell help function of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory CD4(+) T cells. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100224. 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ettinger R, Sims GP, Fairhurst AM, Robbins R, da Silva YS, Spolski R, Leonard WJ, and Lipsky PE (2005). IL-21 induces differentiation of human naive and memory B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells. J. Immunol. 175, 7867–7879. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Good KL, Bryant VL, and Tangye SG (2006). Kinetics of human B cell behavior and amplification of proliferative responses following stimulation with IL-21. J. Immunol. 177, 5236–5247. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Albrecht I, Niesner U, Janke M, Menning A, Loddenkemper C, Kühl AA, Lepenies I, Lexberg MH, Westendorf K, Hradilkova K, et al. (2010). Persistence of effector memory Th1 cells is regulated by Hopx. Eur. J. Immunol. 40, 2993–3006. 10.1002/eji.201040936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baaten BJG, Li CR, Deiro MF, Lin MM, Linton PJ, and Bradley LM (2010). CD44 regulates survival and memory development in Th1 cells. Immunity 32, 104–115. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Freeley S, Cardone J, Günther SC, West EE, Reinheckel T, Watts C, Kemper C, and Kolev MV (2018). Asparaginyl Endopeptidase (Legumain) Supports Human Th1 Induction via Cathepsin L-Mediated Intracellular C3 Activation. Front. Immunol. 9, 2449. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shin H, and Iwasaki A (2013). Tissue-resident memory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 255, 165–181. 10.1111/imr.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Woodruff MC, Ramonell RP, Nguyen DC, Cashman KS, Saini AS, Haddad NS, Ley AM, Kyu S, Howell JC, Ozturk T, et al. (2020). Extrafollicular B cell responses correlate with neutralizing antibodies and morbidity in COVID-19. Nat. Immunol. 21, 1506–1516. 10.1038/s41590-020-00814-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.St John AL, and Rathore APS (2019). Adaptive immune responses to primary and secondary dengue virus infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 218–230. 10.1038/s41577-019-0123-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sangkaew S, Ming D, Boonyasiri A, Honeyford K, Kalayanarooj S, Yacoub S, Dorigatti I, and Holmes A (2021). Risk predictors of progression to severe disease during the febrile phase of dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 1014–1026. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30601-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jayathilaka D, Gomes L, Jeewandara C, Jayarathna GSB, Herath D, Perera PA, Fernando S, Wijewickrama A, Hardman CS, Ogg GS, and Malavige GN (2018). Role of NS1 antibodies in the pathogenesis of acute secondary dengue infection. Nat. Commun. 9, 5242. 10.1038/s41467-018-07667-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Falconar AK (1997). The dengue virus nonstructural-1 protein (NS1) generates antibodies to common epitopes on human blood clotting, integrin/adhesin proteins and binds to human endothelial cells: potential implications in haemorrhagic fever pathogenesis. Arch. Virol. 142, 897–916. 10.1007/s007050050127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lin CF, Lei HY, Shiau AL, Liu CC, Liu HS, Yeh TM, Chen SH, and Lin YS (2003). Antibodies from dengue patient sera cross-react with endothelial cells and induce damage. J. Med. Virol. 69, 82–90. 10.1002/jmv.10261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chuang YC, Lin YS, Liu HS, and Yeh TM (2014). Molecular mimicry between dengue virus and coagulation factors induces antibodies to inhibit thrombin activity and enhance fibrinolysis. J. Virol. 88, 13759–13768. 10.1128/JVI.02166-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Katzelnick LC, Gresh L, Halloran ME, Mercado JC, Kuan G, Gordon A, Balmaseda A, and Harris E (2017). Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans. Science 358, 929–932. 10.1126/science.aan6836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Appanna R, Kg S, Xu MH, Toh YX, Velumani S, Carbajo D, Lee CY, Zuest R, Balakrishnan T, Xu W, et al. (2016). Plasmablasts During Acute Dengue Infection Represent a Small Subset of a Broader Virus-specific Memory B Cell Pool. EBioMedicine 12, 178–188. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vella LA, Buggert M, Manne S, Herati RS, Sayin I, Kuri-Cervantes L, Bukh Brody I, O’Boyle KC, Kaprielian H, Giles JR, et al. (2019). T follicular helper cells in human efferent lymph retain lymphoid characteristics. J. Clin. Investig. 129, 3185–3200. 10.1172/JCI125628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ellebedy AH, Jackson KJL, Kissick HT, Nakaya HI, Davis CW, Roskin KM, McElroy AK, Oshansky CM, Elbein R, Thomas S, et al. (2016). Defining antigen-specific plasmablast and memory B cell subsets in human blood after viral infection or vaccination. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1226–1234. 10.1038/ni.3533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Asashima H, Mohanty S, Comi M, Ruff WE, Hoehn KB, Wong P, Klein J, Lucas C, Cohen I, Coffey S, et al. (2023). PD-1(high)CXCR5(−) CD4(+) peripheral helper T cells promote CXCR3(+) plasmablasts in human acute viral infection. Cell Rep. 42, 111895. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Djuretic IM, Levanon D, Negreanu V, Groner Y, Rao A, and Ansel KM (2007). Transcription factors T-bet and Runx3 cooperate to activate Ifng and silence Il4 in T helper type 1 cells. Nat. Immunol. 8, 145–153. 10.1038/ni1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Oestreich KJ, and Weinmann AS (2012). Transcriptional mechanisms that regulate T helper 1 cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 24, 191–195. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Choi J, and Crotty S (2021). Bcl6-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation of Follicular Helper T cells (T(FH)). Trends Immunol. 42, 336–349. 10.1016/j.it.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Del Alcazar D, Wang Y, He C, Wendel BS, Del Rίo-Estrada PM, Lin J, Ablanedo-Terrazas Y, Malone MJ, Hernandez SM, Frank I, et al. (2019). Mapping the Lineage Relationship between CXCR5(+) and CXCR5(−) CD4(+) T Cells in HIV-Infected Human Lymph Nodes. Cell Rep. 28, 3047–3060.e7. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rao DA, Gurish MF, Marshall JL, Slowikowski K, Fonseka CY, Liu Y, Donlin LT, Henderson LA, Wei K, Mizoguchi F, et al. (2017). Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 542, 110–114. 10.1038/nature20810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Caielli S, Veiga DT, Balasubramanian P, Athale S, Domic B, Murat E, Banchereau R, Xu Z, Chandra M, Chung CH, et al. (2019). A CD4(+) T cell population expanded in lupus blood provides B cell help through interleukin-10 and succinate. Nat. Med. 25, 75–81. 10.1038/s41591-018-0254-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Christophersen A, Lund EG, Snir O, Solà E, Kanduri C, Dahal-Koirala S, Zühlke S, Molberg Ø, Utz PJ, Rohani-Pichavant M, et al. (2019). Distinct phenotype of CD4(+) T cells driving celiac disease identified in multiple autoimmune conditions. Nat. Med. 25, 734–737. 10.1038/s41591-019-0403-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Muskardin TLW, and Niewold TB (2018). Type I interferon in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 14, 214–228. 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sumida TS, Dulberg S, Schupp JC, Lincoln MR, Stillwell HA, Axisa PP, Comi M, Unterman A, Kaminski N, Madi A, et al. (2022). Type I interferon transcriptional network regulates expression of coinhibitory receptors in human T cells. Nat. Immunol. 23, 632–642. 10.1038/s41590-022-01152-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Elsner RA, and Shlomchik MJ (2020). Germinal Center and Extrafollicular B Cell Responses in Vaccination, Immunity, and Autoimmunity. Immunity 53, 1136–1150. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Zumaquero E, Marigorta UM, Patel AV, Wang X, Tomar D, Woodruff MC, Simon Z, Bugrovsky R, et al. (2018). Distinct Effector B Cells Induced by Unregulated Toll-like Receptor 7 Contribute to Pathogenic Responses in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Immunity 49, 725–739.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lin CF, Wan SW, Cheng HJ, Lei HY, and Lin YS (2006). Autoimmune pathogenesis in dengue virus infection. Viral Immunol. 19, 127–132. 10.1089/vim.2006.19.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Popescu M, Cabrera-Martinez B, and Winslow GM (2019). TNF-alpha Contributes to Lymphoid Tissue Disorganization and Germinal Center B Cell Suppression during Intracellular Bacterial Infection. J. Immunol. 203, 2415–2424. 10.4049/jimmunol.1900484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rivino L, Kumaran EA, Thein TL, Too CT, Gan VCH, Hanson BJ, Wilder-Smith A, Bertoletti A, Gascoigne NRJ, Lye DC, et al. (2015). Virus-specific T lymphocytes home to the skin during natural dengue infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 278ra35. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Szabo PA, Miron M, and Farber DL (2019). Location, location, location: Tissue resident memory T cells in mice and humans. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaas9673. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aas9673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xiong Y, Piao W, Brinkman CC, Li L, Kulinski JM, Olivera A, Cartier A, Hla T, Hippen KL, Blazar BR, et al. (2019). CD4 T cell sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR)1 and S1PR4 and endothelial S1PR2 regulate afferent lymphatic migration. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaav1263. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aav1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Finak G, McDavid A, Yajima M, Deng J, Gersuk V, Shalek AK, Slichter CK, Miller HW, McElrath MJ, Prlic M, et al. (2015). MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278. 10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Korotkevich G, Sukhov V, Budin N, Shpak B, Artyomov MN, and Sergushichev A (2021). Fast gene set enrichment analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv, 060012. 10.1101/060012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Trapnell C, Cacchiarelli D, Grimsby J, Pokharel P, Li S, Morse M, Lennon NJ, Livak KJ, Mikkelsen TS, and Rinn JL (2014). The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386. 10.1038/nbt.2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Borcherding N, Bormann NL, and Kraus G (2020). scRepertoire: An R-based toolkit for single-cell immune receptor analysis. F1000Res. 9, 47. 10.12688/f1000research.22139.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, and Brors B (2014). circlize Implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Conway JR, Lex A, and Gehlenborg N (2017). UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33, 2938–2940. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dan JM, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Weiskopf D, da Silva Antunes R, Havenar-Daughton C, Reiss SM, Brigger M, Bothwell M, Sette A, and Crotty S (2016). A Cytokine-Independent Approach To Identify Antigen-Specific Human Germinal Center T Follicular Helper Cells and Rare Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells in Blood. J. Immunol. 197, 983–993. 10.4049/jimmunol.1600318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.van den Brink SC, Sage F, Vértesy Á, Spanjaard B, Peterson-Maduro J, Baron CS, Robin C, and van Oudenaarden A (2017). Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations. Nat. Methods 14, 935–936. 10.1038/nmeth.4437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Buffa FM, Harris AL, West CM, and Miller CJ (2010). Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene. Br. J. Cancer 102, 428–435. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Xu C, and Su Z (2015). Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method. Bioinformatics 31, 1974–1980. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Patil VS, Madrigal A, Schmiedel BJ, Clarke J, O’Rourke P, de Silva AD, Harris E, Peters B, Seumois G, Weiskopf D, et al. (2018). Precursors of human CD4(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes identified by single-cell transcriptome analysis. Sci. Immunol. 3, eaan8664. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan8664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Seumois G, Ramίrez-Suástegui C, Schmiedel BJ, Liang S, Peters B, Sette A, and Vijayanand P (2020). Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of allergen-specific T cells in allergy and asthma. Sci Immunol 5, eaba6087. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aba6087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The published article includes all the datasets generated during this study. The scripts are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14632965. The sequencing data for this study have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus and are publicly available as of the date of publication. Accession numbers are listed in the key resources table. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
KEY RESOURCES TABLE.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Antibodies | ||
|
| ||
| CD14, APC-eFluor 780, 61D3 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0149-42; RRID: AB_1834358 |
| CD16, APC-eFluor 780, eBioCB16 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0168-42; RRID: AB_11220086 |
| CD20, APC-eFluor 780, 2H7 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0209-42; RRID: AB_1272038 |
| CD8a, APC-eFluor 780, RPA-T8 | eBioscience | Cat# 47-0088-42; RRID: AB_1272046 |
| FOXP3, PE, PCH101 | eBioscience | Cat# 12-4777-42; RRID: AB_1944444 |
| ICOS, FITC, C398.4A | eBioscience | Cat# 11-9949-82; RRID: AB_465458 |
| Ki67, PE, SolA15 | eBioscience | Cat# 12-5698-82; RRID: AB_11150954 |
| CCR6, PE, 11A9 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 559562; RRID: AB_397273 |
| CD14, PE, MΦP9 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562691; RRID: AB_2737725 |
| CD25, APC, M-A251 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555434; RRID: AB_398598 |
| CD25, PE-CF594, M-A251 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562403; RRID: AB_11151919 |
| CD38, PE/Cyanine5, HIT2 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555461; RRID: AB_395854 |
| CD45RO, FITC, UCHL1 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555492; RRID: AB_395883 |
| CXCR5, Alexa Fluor 647, RF8B2 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 558113; RRID: AB_2737606 |
| GZMB, PE, JES3-9D7 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561142; RRID: AB_10561690 |
| ICOS, PE-CF594, C398.4A | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565888; RRID: AB_2869727 |
| IFN-γ, PE-CF594, B27 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562392; RRID: AB_11153859 |
| IL-10, Brilliant Violet 421, JES3-9D7 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 564053; RRID: AB_2738566 |
| IL-21, Alexa Fluor 647, 3A3-N2.1 | BD Biosciences | Cat# 560493; RRID: AB_1645421 |
| CCR4, TotalSeq-C0071, L291H4 | BioLegend | Cat# 359425; RRID: AB_2800988 |
| CCR6, Alexa Fluor 488, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353414; RRID: AB_10916395 |
| CCR6, PE/Cyanine7, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353418; RRID: AB_10916518 |
| CCR6, TotalSeq-C0143, G034E3 | BioLegend | Cat# 353440; RRID: AB_2810563 |
| CD11c, PE, S-HCL-3 | BioLegend | Cat# 371504; RRID: AB_2616899 |
| CD19, Brilliant Violet 785, HIB19 | BioLegend | Cat# 302240; RRID: AB_2563442 |
| CD20, PE/Cyanine7, 2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 302312; RRID: AB_314259 |
| CD21, PE/Cyanine7, Bu32 | BioLegend | Cat# 354912; RRID: AB_2561576 |
| CD24, APC, ML5 | BioLegend | Cat# 311118; RRID: AB_1877150 |
| CD27, PE/Dazzle 594, M-T271 | BioLegend | Cat# 356422; RRID: AB_2564100 |
| CD27, TotalSeq-C0154, O323 | BioLegend | Cat# 302853; RRID: AB_2800747 |
| CD3, APC/Cyanine7, HIT3a | BioLegend | Cat# 300318; RRID: AB_314053 |
| CD38, Brilliant Violet 421, HIT2 | BioLegend | Cat# 303526; RRID: AB_10900230 |
| CD38, Brilliant Violet 510, HIT2 | BioLegend | Cat# 303540; RRID: AB_2616791 |
| CD4, Alexa Fluor 700, RPA-T4 | BioLegend | Cat# 300526; RRID: AB_493743 |
| CD40L, PE/Cyanine7, 24-31 | BioLegend | Cat# 310832; RRID: AB_2563016 |
| CD45RA, Brilliant Violet 785, HI100 | BioLegend | Cat# 304140; RRID: AB_2561369 |
| CD71, APC, CY1G4 | BioLegend | Cat# 334108; RRID: AB_10915138 |
| CD8a, APC, RPA-T8 | BioLegend | Cat# 301049; RRID: AB_2562054 |
| CXCR3, Alexa Fluor 488, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353710; RRID: AB_10962442 |
| CXCR3, Brilliant Violet711, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353732; RRID: AB_2563532 |
| CXCR3, TotalSeq-C0140, G025H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 353747; RRID: AB_2800949 |
| CXCR5, Brilliant Violet 421, J252D4 | BioLegend | Cat# 356920; RRID: AB_2562302 |
| CXCR5, TotalSeq-C0144, J252D4 | BioLegend | Cat# 356939; RRID: AB_2800968 |
| HLA-DR, Brilliant Violet 560, L243 | BioLegend | Cat# 307650; RRID: AB_2562544 |
| IgD, FITC, IA6-2 | BioLegend | Cat# 348206; RRID: AB_10613638 |
| OX40, PE/Cyanine7, Ber-ACT35 | BioLegend | Cat# 350012; RRID: AB_10901161 |
| PD-1, Brilliant Violet 421, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329920; RRID: AB_10900818 |
| PD-1, Brilliant Violet 711, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329928; RRID: AB_11218612 |
| PD-1, PE, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329906; RRID: AB_940481 |
| PD-1, PE/Dazzle 594, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329940; RRID: AB_2563658 |
| PD-1, TotalSeq-C0088, EH12.2H7 | BioLegend | Cat# 329963; RRID: AB_2800862 |
| IL-2, Brilliant Violet 650, MQ1-17H12 | BioLegend | Cat# 500334; RRID: AB_11147166 |
| Human IL-10 antibody | R&D Systems | Cat# MAB2173-100; RRID: AB_3663041 |
| Human IL-4 antibody | R&D Systems | Cat# MAB204-100; RRID: AB_2126745 |
| IFN-γ mAb (1-D1K), purified | Mabtech | Cat# 3420-3-250; RRID: AB_907283 |
| IL-21 mAb (MT21.3m), biotin | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-6-250; RRID: AB_11178374 |
| IL-21 mAb (MT216G), purified | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-1-250; RRID: AB_3663042 |
| Goat anti-human Ig Fab, UNLB | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2085-01; RRID: AB_2795785 |
| Goat Anti-Human IgG Fc, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2014-05; RRID: AB_2795580 |
| Goat Anti-Human IgG, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 2045-05; RRID: AB_2795676 |
| Goat, Anti-mouse IgG, HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 1030-05; RRID: AB_2619742 |
| 4G2 antibody | N/A | N/A |
| Hashtag 2, TotalSeq-C0252, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394663; RRID: AB_2801032 |
| Hashtag 3, TotalSeq-C0253, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394665; RRID: AB_2801033 |
| Hashtag 4, TotalSeq-C0254, LNH-94; 2M2 | BioLegend | Cat# 394667; RRID: AB_2801034 |
|
| ||
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
|
| ||
| DENV serotype 2 virus, strain S-16803 | N/A | N/A |
|
| ||
| Biological samples | ||
|
| ||
| Blood samples from hospitalized dengue patients | AIIMS Hospital, Delhi, India | N/A |
| Blood samples from discharged convalescent dengue patients | N/A | N/A |
| Healthy donor blood buffy coats | AIIMS Hospital Blood Bank, Delhi, India | N/A |
| Paired blood and Lymphoid tissues | AIIMS Hospital, Delhi, India | N/A |
|
| ||
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
|
| ||
| Ficoll-Paque PLUS | Cytiva Life Sciences | Cat# 17144003 |
| RPMI 1640 | Cytiva Life Sciences | Cat# SH30027 |
| AIM-V medium (1X) | Gibco | Cat# 12055-091 |
| DPBS (10X) | Gibco | Cat# 14200-075 |
| Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | Cat# 10270-106 |
| RPMI 1640 + Glutamax-I (1X) | Gibco | Cat# 61870-036 |
| Pen-Strep | Gibco | Cat# 15140-122 |
| ACK lysis buffer | Gibco | Cat# A1049201 |
| EDTA (0.5M), pH 8.0 | Invitrogen | Cat# AM9260G |
| Fixable Viability Dye eFluor506 | Invitrogen | Cat# 65-0866-14 |
| Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 | Invitrogen | Cat# 65-0865-14 |
| Dnase I (1 mg/mL) | StemCell | Cat# 07900 |
| PI/AO stain | Logos Biosystems | Cat# F23001 |
| Concanavalin A | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# C0412 |
| DMSO | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# D2650 |
| DNase I (Roche) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 11284932001 |
| Ionomycin calcium Salt | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# I3909 |
| OPD tablet, 10mg | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P8287 |
| Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P8139 |
| Staphylococcal enterotoxin B | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# S4881 |
| Trypan Blue Solution (0.4%) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# T8154 |
| Tween 20 | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P1379 |
| Paraformaldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P6148 |
| Ethanol | Merck Millipore | Cat# 100983 |
| Hydrochloric acid, 37% | Merck Millipore | Cat# 100317 |
| GolgiPlug Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Brefeldin A) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555029 |
| Skim milk powder | HiMedia | Cat# GRM1254 |
| Buffer EB | Qiagen | Cat# 19086 |
| BCP/NBT-plus for ALP | Mabtech | Cat# 3650-10 |
| Streptavidin-ALP | Mabtech | Cat# 3310-10-1000 |
| Human IL-21R Fc chimera, CF | R&D Systems | Cat# 991-R2-100 |
| Dengue Virus Serotype 2 NS1 protein | Native Antigen, UK | DENV2-NS1-100 |
| Dengue Virus Serotype 2 VLP protein | Native Antigen, UK | DENV2-VLP-100 |
| DENV peptide megapool | Grifoni et al.29 | N/A |
| Carboxymethylcellulose | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# M0512-250 |
| 20% Paraformaldehyde aqueous solution | Electron Microscopy Sciences | Cat# 50-980-493 |
| Bovine Serum Albumin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# A7030-100G |
| Saponin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 47036-250G-F |
| TrueBlue Peroxidase Substrate | SeraCare | Cat# 5510-0030 |
|
| ||
| Critical commercial assays | ||
|
| ||
| Human IL-21 (ALP) ELISpot Kit | Mabtech | Cat# 3540-2A |
| Human IFN-γ/IL-10 FluoroSpot Kit | Mabtech | Cat# FSP-0107-02 |
| Dengue IgM Capture ELISA | Abbott | Cat# 01PE20 |
| Dengue IgG Capture ELISA | Abbott | Cat# 01PE10 |
| Dengue NS1 Ag Microlisa | J. Mitra & Co. | Cat# IR031096 |
| Anti-Dengue virus IgG ELISA Kit | Abcam | Cat# Ab108728 |
| Human CXCL13/BLC/BCA-1 Quantikine ELISA Kit | R&D Systems | Cat# DCX130 |
| Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set | Invitrogen | Cat# 00-5523-00 |
| CellTrace Violet Proliferation Kit | Invitrogen | Cat# C34557 |
| Qubit 1X dsDNA HS Assay Kit | Invitrogen | Cat# Q32851 |
| SPRIselect, 5mL | Beckman Coulter | Cat# B23317 |
| HS NGS Fragment Kit (1-6000bp) | Agilent | Cat# DNF-474-0500 |
| Capillary Storage Solution | Agilent | Cat# GP-440-0100 |
| Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5' Kit v2, 4 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000265 |
| Chromium Single Cell Human TCR Amplification Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000252 |
| Library Construction Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000190 |
| Chromium Next GEM Chip K Single Cell Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000287 |
| 5' Feature Barcode Kit, 16 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000256 |
| Dual Index Kit TN Set A, 96 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000250 |
| Dual Index Kit TT Set A, 96 rxns | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000215 |
| Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Screening Panel, 48-plex | Bio-Rad | Cat# 12007283 |
|
| ||
| Deposited data | ||
|
| ||
| Single-cell RNAseq data | Gene Expression Omnibus | GSE280258 |
| Scripts | Zenodo | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14632965 |
|
| ||
| Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
|
| ||
| Vero | ATCC | Cat# CCL-81; RRID: CVCL_0059 |
| D1-4G2-4-15 | ATCC | Cat# HB-112; RRID: CVCL_J890 |
|
| ||
| Software and algorithms | ||
|
| ||
| FlowJo V10.3.0 | FlowJo, LLC | https://www.flowjo.com/ |
| AID Elispot v7.0 | AID GmbH | https://www.elispot.com/ |
| SkanIt v6.1 | Thermo Scientific | https://www.thermofisher.com/ |
| Bio-Plex Manager v6.2 | Bio-Rad | https://www.bio-rad.com/ |
| Prism V8.4.3 | GraphPad | https://www.graphpad.com/ |
| Cell Ranger V7.0.1 | 10x Genomics | https://www.10xgenomics.com/ |
| Seurat V4.3.0 | Stuart et al.28 | https://www.satijalab.org/seurat |
| R V4.3.1 | R Core Team | https://www.r-project.org/ |
| MAST | Finak et al.67 | https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/MAST.html |
| fgsea | Korotkevich et al.68 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/fgsea.html |
| Monocle3 V1.3.1 | Trapnell et al.69 | https://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/monocle3/ |
| scRepertoire V1.10.0 | Borcherding et al.70 | https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/scRepertoire.html |
| circlize | Gu et al.71 | https://github.com/jokergoo/circlize |
| UpSetR | Conway et al.72 | https://github.com/hms-dbmi/UpSetR |
|
| ||
| Other | ||
|
| ||
| 96 Well Round (U) Bottom Plate | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 163320 |
| Flat-bottom Immuno 96-well MaxiSorp Plates | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 442404 |
| Nunc MicroWell 96-well, Flat-bottom Microplate | Thermo Scientific | Cat# 136101 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 2-20 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078535 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 2-200 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078551 |
| ep Dualfilter T.I.P.S. 50 - 1,000 μL | Eppendorf | Cat# 0030078578 |
| MultiScreen IP Filter Plate | Millipore | Cat# MSIPS4510 |
| MultiScreen IP-FL Filter Plate | Millipore | Cat# S5EJ104I07 |
