Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 May;119(1):161–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.161

Conservative Intrachromosomal Recombination between Inverted Repeats in Mouse Cells: Association between Reciprocal Exchange and Gene Conversion

R J Bollag 1, R M Liskay 1
PMCID: PMC1203336  PMID: 3396860

Abstract

Recombination in mammalian cells is thought to involve both reciprocal and nonreciprocal modes of exchange, although rigorous proof is lacking due to the inability to recover all products of an exchange. To investigate further the relationship between these modes of exchange, we have analyzed intrachromosomal recombination between duplicated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV tk) mutant alleles arranged as inverted repeats in cultured mouse L cells. In crosses between inverted repeats, a single intrachromatid reciprocal exchange leads to inversion of the sequence between the crossover sites and recovery of both genes involved in the event. The majority of recombinant products do not display such inversion and are thus consistent with a nonreciprocal mode of recombination (gene conversion). The remaining products display the sequence inversion predicted for intrachromatid reciprocal exchange. In light of the fact that intrachromatid exchanges occur, the rarity of intrachromatid double reciprocal exchanges strengthens the interpretation that the majority of events in this and previous investigations involve gene conversion. Furthermore, in accord with prediction, one-third of the reciprocal recombinants (inversions) display associated gene conversion. This association suggests that reciprocal and nonreciprocal modes of exchange are mechanistically related in mammalian cells. Finally, the occurrence of inversion recombinants suggests that intrachromosomal recombination can be a conservative (nondestructive) process.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Capecchi M. R. High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):479–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90358-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chakrabarti S., Seidman M. M. Intramolecular recombination between transfected repeated sequences in mammalian cells is nonconservative. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2520–2526. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fogel S., Mortimer R., Lusnak K., Tavares F. Meiotic gene conversion: a signal of the basic recombination event in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1325–1341. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Meiotic recombination between duplicated genetic elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Feb;109(2):303–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/109.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klar A. J., Strathern J. N. Resolution of recombination intermediates generated during yeast mating type switching. 1984 Aug 30-Sep 5Nature. 310(5980):744–748. doi: 10.1038/310744a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klein H. L. Lack of association between intrachromosomal gene conversion and reciprocal exchange. 1984 Aug 30-Sep 5Nature. 310(5980):748–753. doi: 10.1038/310748a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Klein H. L., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jan 15;289(5794):144–148. doi: 10.1038/289144a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Letsou A., Liskay R. M. Effect of the molecular nature of mutation on the efficiency of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mouse cells. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):759–769. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liskay R. M., Letsou A., Stachelek J. L. Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):161–167. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L. Information transfer between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells involves contiguous regions of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1802–1806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L., Letsou A. Homologous recombination between repeated chromosomal sequences in mouse cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:183–189. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maloney D. H., Fogel S. Gene conversion, unequal crossing-over and mispairing at a non-tandem duplication during meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1987;12(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00420720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Fungal recombination. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):33–58. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.1.33-58.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rossignol J. L., Nicolas A., Hamza H., Langin T. Origins of gene conversion and reciprocal exchange in Ascobolus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:13–21. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rubnitz J., Subramani S. Extrachromosomal and chromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 May;6(5):1608–1614. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.5.1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seidman M. M. Intermolecular homologous recombination between transfected sequences in mammalian cells is primarily nonconservative. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3561–3565. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith A. J., Berg P. Homologous recombination between defective neo genes in mouse 3T6 cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:171–181. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stringer J. R., Kuhn R. M., Newman J. L., Meade J. C. Unequal homologous recombination between tandemly arranged sequences stably incorporated into cultured rat cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Oct;5(10):2613–2622. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.10.2613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wagner M. J., Sharp J. A., Summers W. C. Nucleotide sequence of the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus type 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1441–1445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Willis K. K., Klein H. L. Intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: reciprocal exchange in an inverted repeat and associated gene conversion. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):633–643. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES