Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Jun;119(2):421–433. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.421

Quantitative Genetics of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations between Sexes for Head and Thorax Traits

D E Cowley 1, W R Atchley 1
PMCID: PMC1203424  PMID: 17246429

Abstract

A quantitative genetic analysis is reported for traits on the head and thorax of adult fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster. Females are larger than males, and the magnitude of sexual dimorphism is similar for traits derived from the same imaginal disc, but the level of sexual dimorphism varies widely across discs. The greatest difference between males and females occurs for the dimensions of the sclerotized mouthparts of the proboscis. Most of the traits studied are highly heritable with heritabilities ranging from 0.26 to 0.84 for males and 0.27 to 0.81 for females. In general, heritabilities are slightly higher for males, possibly reflecting the effect of dosage compensation on X-linked variance. The X chromosome contributes substantially to variance for many of these traits, and including results reported elsewhere, the variance for over two-thirds of the traits studied includes X-linked variance. The genetic correlations between sexes for the same trait are generally high and close to unity. Coupled with the small differences in the traits between sexes for heritabilities and phenotypic variances, these results suggest that selection would be very slow to change the level of sexual dimorphism in size of various body parts.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker B. S., Belote J. M. Sex determination and dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Genet. 1983;17:345–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.002021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker W. K. A clonal analysis reveals early developmental restrictions in the Drosophila head. Dev Biol. 1978 Feb;62(2):447–463. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bird M. A., Schaffer H. E. A study of the genetic basis of the sexual dimorphism for wing length in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Nov;72(3):475–487. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant P. J. Pattern formation in the imaginal wing disc of Drosophila melanogaster: fate map, regeneration and duplication. J Exp Zool. 1975 Jul;193(1):49–77. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401930106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campos-Ortega J. A. On compound eye development in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1980;15(Pt 1):347–371. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60123-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockerham C. C. Modifications in estimating the number of genes for a quantitative character. Genetics. 1986 Oct;114(2):659–664. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.2.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowley D. E., Atchley W. R., Rutledge J. J. Quantitative Genetics of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Sexual Dimorphism in Genetic Parameters for Wing Traits. Genetics. 1986 Oct;114(2):549–566. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coyne J. A. Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genet Res. 1985 Oct;46(2):169–192. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300022643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtsinger J. W. Quantitative wing variation in inbred and outbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. J Hered. 1986 Jul-Aug;77(4):267–271. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dutton F. L., Krider H. M. Expression and amplification of the genes for ribosomal RNA in bobbed mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1985 Apr;45(2):155–165. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300022084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisen E. J., Legates J. E. Genotype-sex interaction and the genetic correlation between the sexes for body weight in Mus musculus. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):611–623. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia-Bellido A., Ripoll P., Morata G. Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nat New Biol. 1973 Oct 24;245(147):251–253. doi: 10.1038/newbio245251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffing B. Influence of sex on selection. I. Contribution of sex-linked genes. Aust J Biol Sci. 1965 Dec;18(6):1157–1170. doi: 10.1071/bi9651157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. James J. W. Covariances between relatives due to sex-linked genes. Biometrics. 1973 Sep;29(3):584–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MULLER H. J. THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2–9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morata G., Lawrence P. A. Development of the eye-antenna imaginal disc of Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1979 Jun;70(2):355–371. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pirrotta V., Steller H., Bozzetti M. P. Multiple upstream regulatory elements control the expression of the Drosophila white gene. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3501–3508. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04109.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. TANTAWY A. O., MALLAH G. S., TEWFIK H. R. STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. II. HERITABILITY AND RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR WING LENGTH IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES. Genetics. 1964 Jun;49:935–948. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.6.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tantawy A. O., Tayel A. A. Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. X. Effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on wing length and the correlated response in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1970 May;65(1):121–132. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES