Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Jun;119(2):435–444. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.435

Unidirectional Incompatibility in Drosophila Simulans: Inheritance, Geographic Variation and Fitness Effects

A A Hoffmann 1, M Turelli 1
PMCID: PMC1203425  PMID: 17246430

Abstract

In California, Drosophila simulans females from some populations (type W) produce relatively few adult progeny when crossed to males from some other populations (type R), but the productivity of the reciprocal cross is comparable to within-population controls. These two incompatibility types are widespread in North America and are also present elsewhere. Both types sometimes occur in the same population. Type R females always produce type R progeny irrespective of the father's type. However, matings between R males and females from stocks classified as type W produce type R progeny at low frequency. This suggests rare paternal transmission of the R incompatibility type, as we have found no evidence for segregation of incompatibility types in the W stocks. There is quantitative variation among type R lines for compatibility with W females, but not vice versa. Population cage studies and productivity tests suggest that deleterious side effects are associated with the type R cytoplasm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr A. R. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in natural populations of a mosquito, Culex pipiens L. Nature. 1980 Jan 3;283(5742):71–72. doi: 10.1038/283071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fine P. E. On the dynamics of symbiote-dependent cytoplasmic incompatibility in culicine mosquitoes. J Invertebr Pathol. 1978 Jan;31(1):10–18. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(78)90102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. French W. L. Genetic and Phenogenetic Studies on the Dynamic Nature of the Cytoplasmic Inheritance System in CULEX PIPIENS. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):447–455. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Subbarao S. K., Krishnamurthy B. S., Curtis C. F., Adak T., Chandrahas R. K. Segregation of cytoplasmic incompatibility properties in Culex pipiens fatigans. Genetics. 1977 Oct;87(2):381–390. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomas-Orillard M. Modifications of Mean Ovariole Number, Fresh Weight of Adult Females and Developmental Time in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Induced by Drosophila C Virus. Genetics. 1984 Aug;107(4):635–644. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.4.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Werren J. H., Nur U., Eickbush D. An extrachromosomal factor causing loss of paternal chromosomes. Nature. 1987 May 7;327(6117):75–76. doi: 10.1038/327075a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES