Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Jul;119(3):639–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.3.639

A Genetic Analysis of Male-Predominant Pheromones in Drosophila Melanogaster

D Scott 1, R C Richmond 1
PMCID: PMC1203449  PMID: 3136054

Abstract

Chemical signals from males play an important role in stimulating Drosophila melanogaster females to mate, and male-predominant pheromones may influence a female's choice of mates. Male-predominant pheromones also inhibit courtship, thereby functioning as antiaphrodisiacs. Interstrain variation in the ratio of two male-predominant pheromones (7-tricosene and 7-pentacosene) has been reported, but the genetic basis for this potentially important variation has not been examined. In a series of crosses between strains that differ radically in the amounts of 7-tricosene and 7-pentacosene, we have identified both X-linked and autosomal contributions to interstrain variation in the amounts of these compounds. The X-linked loci act as enhancers for production of the compound predominant in the strain from which the X chromosome originated. Autosomal factors for each of the two compounds appear to segregate as high vs. low, with incomplete dominance of high 7-tricosene over low, and low 7-pentacosene over high. A significant negative correlation between the quantities of 7-pentacosene and 7-tricosene in the F(2) and backcross progeny, but not in the F(1)s or parentals, indicates linkage between autosomal loci regulating the expression of each compound. However, the phenotypic distributions of the backcross progeny indicate that additional unlinked loci are also directly involved in the production of these two hydrocarbons.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (842.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aceves-Piña E. O., Quinn W. G. Learning in normal and mutant Drosophila larvae. Science. 1979 Oct 5;206(4414):93–96. doi: 10.1126/science.206.4414.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Averhoff W. W., Richardson R. H. Multiple pheromone system controlling mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Feb;73(2):591–593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.2.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomquist G. J., Jackson L. L. Chemistry and biochemistry of insect waxes. Prog Lipid Res. 1979;17(4):319–345. doi: 10.1016/0079-6832(79)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gailey D. A., Lacaillade R. C., Hall J. C. Chemosensory elements of courtship in normal and mutant, olfaction-deficient Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1986 May;16(3):375–405. doi: 10.1007/BF01071319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jallon J. M. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav Genet. 1984 Sep;14(5):441–478. doi: 10.1007/BF01065444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Markow T. A., Hanson S. J. Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):430–434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tompkins L., Gross A. C., Hall J. C., Gailey D. A., Siegel R. W. The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1982 May;12(3):295–307. doi: 10.1007/BF01067849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. van den Berg M. J., Thomas G., Hendriks H., van Delden W. A reexamination of the negative assortative mating phenomenon and its underlying mechanism in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1984 Jan;14(1):45–61. doi: 10.1007/BF01066068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES