Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Nov;120(3):819–829. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.819

The Coalescent Process in Models with Selection

N L Kaplan 1, T Darden 1, R R Hudson 1
PMCID: PMC1203559  PMID: 3066685

Abstract

Statistical properties of the process describing the genealogical history of a random sample of genes are obtained for a class of population genetics models with selection. For models with selection, in contrast to models without selection, the distribution of this process, the coalescent process, depends on the distribution of the frequencies of alleles in the ancestral generations. If the ancestral frequency process can be approximated by a diffusion, then the mean and the variance of the number of segregating sites due to selectively neutral mutations in random samples can be numerically calculated. The calculations are greatly simplified if the frequencies of the alleles are tightly regulated. If the mutation rates between alleles maintained by balancing selection are low, then the number of selectively neutral segregating sites in a random sample of genes is expected to substantially exceed the number predicted under a neutral model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (865.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aquadro C. F., Desse S. F., Bland M. M., Langley C. H., Laurie-Ahlberg C. C. Molecular population genetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1165–1190. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chakravarti A., Elbein S. C., Permutt M. A. Evidence for increased recombination near the human insulin gene: implication for disease association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(4):1045–1049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.4.1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gillespie J. H. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. V. The SAS--CFF model. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Aug;14(1):1–45. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillespie J. H. Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA. Genetics. 1986 Aug;113(4):1077–1091. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartl D. L., Campbell R. B. Allele multiplicity in simple Mendelian disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 1982 Nov;34(6):866–873. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R. On the divergence of genes in multigene families. Theor Popul Biol. 1987 Feb;31(1):178–194. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(87)90028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kreitman M. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1983 Aug 4;304(5925):412–417. doi: 10.1038/304412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephens J. C., Nei M. Phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic DNA sequences at the Adh locus in Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. J Mol Evol. 1985;22(4):289–300. doi: 10.1007/BF02115684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES