ABSTRACT
Alginate lyases depolymerize alginate and generate alginate oligosaccharides (AOS) and eventually 4‐deoxy‐L‐erythro‐5‐hexoseulose uronate (DEH), a monosaccharide. Recently, alginate lyases have garnered significant attention due to the increasing demand for AOS, which exhibit bioactivities beneficial to human health, livestock productivity, and agricultural efficiency. Additionally, these enzymes play a crucial role in producing DEH, essential in alginate catabolism in bacteria. This review explains the industrial value of AOS and DEH, which contribute broadly to industries ranging from the food industry to biorefinery processes. This review also highlights recent advances in alginate lyase applications and engineering, including domain truncation, chimeric enzyme design, rational mutagenesis, and directed evolution. These approaches have enhanced enzyme performance for efficient AOS and DEH production. We also discuss current challenges and future directions toward industrial‐scale bioconversion of alginate‐rich biomass.
Keywords: 4‐deoxy‐L‐erythro‐5‐hexoseulose uronate, alginate lyase engineering, alginate oligosaccharide, bioactive compounds, enzymatic degradation of alginate
This review covers alginate lyases that depolymerise alginate into AOS (alginate oligosaccharides) and DEH (4‐deoxy‐L‐erythro‐5‐hexoseulose uronate). It discusses the industrial applications of AOS and DEH in food, agriculture, and biorefinery processes. Additionally, it explores recent advancements in enzyme engineering, including chimeric enzyme construction, truncation, computer‐aided design, and directed evolution, to enhance alginate lyase efficiency.

1. Introduction
Alginate is a co‐polymer of D‐mannuronic acid (M)/L‐guluronic acid (G) and is a major structural polysaccharide in brown macroalgae (Gundewadi et al. 2018; Arroyo et al. 2020; Sahoo and Biswal 2021). Its degraded products, such as alginate oligosaccharides (AOS) and 4‐deoxy‐L‐erythro‐5‐hexoseulose uronate (DEH), also demonstrate potential in the medical, pharmaceutical, human nutrition, agricultural, and biorefinery industries (Liu et al. 2019; Kawai and Hashimoto 2022). Specifically, AOS refer to oligosaccharides with a degree of polymerisation (DP) ranging from 2 to 25 and exhibit various clinical activities, including anti‐tumour, anti‐obesity, anti‐inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects, making them promising ingredients for functional supplements in the food industry (Liu et al. 2019). Beyond these clinical applications, AOS can enhance productivity in agriculture and the livestock industry, positioning them as eco‐friendly agents for sustainable food security (Yamasaki et al. 2016; Zhang, Wang, et al. 2020). DEH, as a metabolizable sugar, can serve as a sustainable nutrient source for microbial production of food additives (Hobbs et al. 2016). This versatility highlights its potential utility in food chemistry, particularly in the production of functional ingredients. Moreover, it can be converted into value‐added chemicals, including precursors for polymer synthesis and bioethanol, through microbial bioconversion (Kawai et al. 2014; Lim et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2024; Moon et al. 2024).
Alginate lyases can break down alginate in a mild and specific manner, making it a promising tool for producing AOS and DEH (Garron and Cygler 2010; Costa et al. 2021). The enzymes can be classified by the carbohydrate‐active enzyme database (CAZy database), the polysaccharide lyase (PL) families containing alginate lyases and the differences in activities across families (Garron and Cygler 2010). Their biological activities are known to vary depending on the DP and M/G ratios (Liu et al. 2019; Vasudevan, Mrudulakumari, et al. 2021). Chemical or physical degradation of alginate is harsh and uncontrolled, also leading to the production of saturated oligosaccharides (Wang et al. 2016; Ravanal et al. 2017; Nguyen et al. 2020). However, alginate lyases specifically cleave the glycosidic bonds of alginate via β‐elimination and generate unsaturated oligosaccharides, which are known to have superior bioactivities compared to saturated oligosaccharides (Wong et al. 2000). Endo‐type alginate lyases exhibit random cleavage sites, producing unsaturated AOS with double bonds between C4 and C5. In contrast, exo‐type alginate lyases cleave alginate from the terminal residues, producing DEH directly, and occasionally also produce dimers (Suzuki et al. 2006; Takeda et al. 2011; Park et al. 2012; Gimpel et al. 2018; Narsico et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2023). For bacterial metabolism, DEH is quite unstable and will spontaneously hydrolyse and ring‐open, followed by a new 5‐carbon ring formation (DHF) (Arntzen et al. 2021).
Hence, recent efforts have focused on exploiting alginate lyases to effectively obtain AOS and DEH. Heterologous expression and culture condition optimization were performed for scaled production of alginate lyases (Chen et al. 2018; Guo et al. 2023). Utilisation of crude enzymes from alginate‐metabolising microorganisms was cost‐effective by omitting purification steps (Zhang et al. 2024). Additionally, immobilising alginate lyases could enhance their reusability and stability, further contributing to cost‐effective bioprocessing (Chen et al. 2018; Guo et al. 2023). However, thermal instability and low catalytic activity are significant limitations to the industrial production and application of AOS and DEH (Cui et al. 2024). With the development of protein engineering technologies, it is possible to enhance their properties even more efficiently and effectively (Li, wang, et al. 2019).
This review offers a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in alginate lyases, emphasising the industrial value of AOS and DEH, the applications of alginate lyases, and further engineering improvements for enhanced AOS and DEH production. By summarising current knowledge and recent developments in the field, this review can provide a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners aiming to harness the full potential of alginate lyases (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Enzymatic degradation of alginate by alginate lyases: characterisation, industrial applications, and advanced engineering strategies. (A) The enzymatic degradation of cell walls using alginate lyase and the industrial applications of AOS and DEH are discussed. Endolytic and exolytic alginate lyases cleave alginate polysaccharide chains, releasing AOS and DEH, which have significant industrial applications. (B) The discovery and characterisation of alginate lyases are detailed in grey boxes. Conventional and novel alginate lyases are depicted in yellow and red, respectively. For efficient AOS and DEH production, novel alginate lyases with resistance to metal ions, dual activity, broad substrate specificity, and high thermal stability have been identified and studied. (C) Advancements in the production and application of alginate lyases are presented in green boxes. To enhance alginate lyase yields, heterologous expression systems have been developed. The use of crude enzymes from alginate‐degrading microorganisms allows the omission of purification steps. Immobilisation on solid matrices enhances the activity and durability of alginate lyases. (D) Enzyme engineering strategies for alginate lyase are described in orange boxes. Creating chimeric and truncated enzymes through fusion and truncation of alginate lyase modules, respectively, can improve enzyme performance. Computer‐aided rational design, including point mutations and mechanism analysis, can also produce mutant alginate lyases with enhanced properties. Directed evolution using error‐prone PCR induces simultaneous mutations in the coding sequence of alginate lyase. AOS, Alginate oligosaccharide; CBM, Carbohydrate‐binding module; CD, Catalytic domain; DEH, 4‐deoxy‐L‐erythro‐5‐hexoseulose uronate; O.E, Overexpression; PolyG, Poly‐guluronate; PolyM, Poly‐mannuronate; SP, Signal peptide; WT AL, Wild‐type alginate lyase.
2. Applications of Alginate‐Degraded Products
Numerous studies have demonstrated that AOS obtained by alginate lyase‐mediated degradation exhibit beneficial effects (Table 1), particularly on human health (Zhang et al. 2023). Firstly, AOS are recognised for their antitumour activities; treating osteosarcoma patients with AOS of various DP (DP 2–5) revealed that only AOS with DP 5 exhibited anticancer effects against osteosarcoma cells (Chen et al. 2017). Unsaturated AOS from alginate lyase showed higher antitumour activity than acid‐hydrolyzed AOS, inducing greater TNF‐α secretion in RAW264.7 cells (mouse macrophage cell line), highlighting the importance of the unsaturated terminal structure (Iwamoto et al. 2005). Using the alginate lyase Aly30 from the marine psychrophilic bacterium Cobetia marina HQZ08, alginate was primarily degraded into trisaccharides. Low‐molecular‐weight AOS exhibited superior antitumour activity compared to high‐molecular‐weight AOS (Qiu et al. 2023). Moreover, AOS can act as immunostimulatory agents. AOS with DP 3–9 derived from sodium alginate acted as immunostimulatory agents on RAW264.7 cells, promoting the production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Both are cytotoxic molecules secreted by macrophages to kill pathogens and tumours. This promoting effect was most pronounced when AOS were produced using alginate lyase (Xu et al. 2014, 2015).
TABLE 1.
Applications of AOS.
| Alginate source | Degradation method | Size | Effect of alginate oligosaccharides | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Qingdao Qingya Chemical Co.) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Agarivorans sp. L11) | DP 2–5 | Antitumor effect | Chen et al. (2017) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Nacalai Tesque Inc.) | Acid hydrolysis/Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Pseudoalteromonas sp.) | DP 3–9 | Antitumor effect | Iwamoto et al. (2005) |
| Saccharina japonica | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Cobetia marina HQZ08) | Mainly DP 3 | Antitumor effect | Qiu et al. (2023) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | Enzymatic degradation (Pseudoalteromonas sp.) | DP 3–9 | Immunostimulatory effect | Xu et al. (2015) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Nuotai) | Acid hydrolysis/Enzymatic degradation (Pseudoalteromonas sp.) | Average DP 5 | Immunostimulatory effect | Xu et al. (2014) |
| Commercial AOS (from BZ Oligo Biotech Co. Ltd.) | — | — | Antimicrobial effect | Asadpoor et al. (2021) |
| Commercial AOS (from DuPont Nutrition and Health) | Acid hydrolysis | Average DP 20.135 | Antimicrobial effect | Bouillon et al. (2019) |
| Commercial AOS (from AlgiPharma AS) | — | — | Antimicrobial effect | Hengzhuang et al. (2016) |
| Commercial AOS (from AlgiPharma AS) | — | — | Antimicrobial effect | Pritchard, Powell, et al. (2017) |
| Commercial AOS (from AlgiPharma AS) | — | — | Antimicrobial effect | Powell et al. (2023) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Sigma‐Aldrich) | — | Antimicrobial effect | Park et al. (2016) |
| Commercial AOS (from AlgiPharma AS) | — | — | Antimicrobial effect | Pritchard, Jack, et al. (2017) |
| Commercial AOS (from BZ Oligo Biotech Co. Ltd.) | — | — | Antioxidant effect | Pan et al. (2021) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from DuPont) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Nagase Enzymes) | DP 2–4 | Antioxidant effect | Falkeborg et al. (2014) |
| Commercial sodium alginate | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Microbulbifer sp. ALW1) | DP 2–3 | Antioxidant effect | Zhu et al. (2016) |
| Commercial AOS (from BZ Oligo Biotech Co. Ltd.) | — | — | Antioxidant effect | Feng et al. (2021) |
| Oligomannuronate prepared by school of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China | — | — | Antidiabetic effect | Hao et al. (2015) |
| Commercial AOS (from Nanjing Junlan Biotechnology Company) | — | DP 1–4 | Antidiabetic effect | Wang et al. (2020) |
| Saccharina japonica | Acid hydrolysis/Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Vibrio sp. SY01) | DP 2–3 | Anti‐obesity effect | Li, He, and Wang (2019) |
| Saccharina japonica | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Vibrio sp. SY01) | DP 2–3 | Anti‐obesity effect | Li, Wang, et al. (2020) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from KIMICA Co.) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Pseudoalteromonas sp.) | DP 1–3 | Productivity increase in the livestock and fishery industry | Yamasaki et al. (2016) |
| AOS prepared by Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Enzymatic degradation | — | Productivity increase in the livestock and fishery industry | Yan et al. (2011) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Kimika Co.) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Pseudoalteromonas sp. Strain no. 272) | DP 2–4 | Productivity increase in the livestock and fishery industry | Hu, Zhang, et al. (2021) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Cargill) | Enzymatic degradation | — | Prebiotic effect | Gupta et al. (2019) |
| Commercial AOS (from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) | — | — | Extension of food shelf life | Ma et al. (2015) |
| Commercial AOS (from Qingdao Oligo Biotech Co. Ltd) | — | Mw ≈ 2800 Da | Extension of food shelf life | Han et al. (2023) |
| Commercial sodium alginate | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Flavobacterium sp. S20) | DP 2–8 | Extension of food shelf life | Liu et al. (2020) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Vibrio sp. C42) | DP 3 | Productivity increase in agriculture | Wang et al. (2024) |
| AOS prepared by the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics | — | — | Productivity increase in agriculture | Du et al. (2023) |
| Commercial sodium alginate | Enzymatic degradation (alginate lyase from Flavobacterium sp. LXA) | Average DP 6.8 | Productivity increase in agriculture | An et al. (2009) |
| Bifurcaria bifurcata | Radical hydrolysis (H2O2) | Mw ≈ 3700 Da | Productivity increase in agriculture | Aitouguinane et al. (2020) |
Abbreviations: DP, degree of polymerisation; Mw, molecular weight.
Additionally, AOS possess antimicrobial properties. AOS have shown capability of inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Streptococcus agalactiae , and Candida species by suppressing biofilm formation (Hengzhuang et al. 2016; Pritchard, Powell, et al. 2017; Bouillon et al. 2019; Asadpoor et al. 2021; Powell et al. 2023). Park et al. (2016) improved oral drug delivery against Escherichia coli by incorporating alginate and its oligosaccharides into artificial gastric juice, achieving antimicrobial activity comparable to pure lysozyme while maintaining enzyme stability and immobilisation efficiency in gastric juice (Park et al. 2016). Moreover, AOS have been shown to effectively reduce the expression of virulence factors in fungal species such as Candida albicans (Pritchard, Jack et al. 2017).
AOS have demonstrated beneficial effects on human health in various aspects, particularly highlighting that unsaturated AOS produced by alginate lyases show higher bioactivities. AOS have strong radical scavenging effects, making them excellent antioxidants. They may help prevent oxidative stress‐related degenerative diseases, such as neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disorders (Li et al. 2023). AOS reduced ROS levels and oxidative stress, protecting mitochondrial function and preventing D‐galactose‐induced cardiac ageing (Feng et al. 2021). Their protective role extended to kidney ageing, where AOS upregulated key antioxidant enzymes such as heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) and NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) (Pan et al. 2021). Moreover, AOS produced using various alginate lyases have shown strong radical scavenging activity against 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′‐azino‐bis‐3‐ethylbenzthiazoline‐6‐sulphonic acid (ABTS), and hydroxyl radicals (Falkeborg et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2016). AOS have been shown to increase insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle cell lines, and their addition has been shown to increase the concentration of beneficial microbiota that can enhance glucose tolerance and insulin secretion, thereby proving the antidiabetic effects (Hao et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2020). Unsaturated AOS generated through enzymatic degradation have been reported to help prevent obesity by modulating gut microbiota and reducing total cholesterol (Li, He, et al. 2019; Li, Wang, et al. 2020).
The bioactivities of AOS have been actively utilised not only for enhancing human health but also for increasing productivity in the livestock and fishery industry. AOS have been reported to enhance the immune response of broiler chickens and promote the growth of Ruditapes philippinarum (Manila clam) (Yan et al. 2011; Yamasaki et al. 2016). Additionally, their prebiotic effects suggest ample potential for application in the feed industry (Gupta et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2023). A recent study by Hu, Zhang, et al. (2021) found that supplementing grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idella ) feed with AOS improved both growth and non‐specific immunity, contributing to increased fishery production. The AOS‐fed carp exhibited higher levels of lysozyme, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total protein, suggesting enhanced immunity (Hu, Zhang, et al. 2021).
AOS can be utilised to extend the shelf life of food products. Few studies have reported that AOS can slow down the quality deterioration of frozen meat. When added to frozen Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp, AOS prevented texture and colour deterioration and inhibited the denaturation of functional proteins (Ma et al. 2015; Zhang, Yao, et al. 2020). Ultrasound‐assisted soaking with AOS improved water retention, reduced ice crystal size, and preserved protein structure in crayfish during freeze–thaw cycles, enhancing physicochemical properties (Han et al. 2023). AOS can also extend the shelf life of fruits. AOS treatment on harvested kiwifruit inhibited moulds and rot, suppressed pectin degradation, and boosted antioxidant enzyme activity and phenol levels. These findings suggest that AOS can extend postharvest fruit quality by preventing decay and promoting antioxidants (Liu et al. 2020).
AOS have exhibited significant potential in agricultural applications, including enhancing plant growth, alleviating growth inhibition caused by environmental stress, and activating plant defence responses (El‐Mohdy 2017; Bose et al. 2019; Zhang, Wang, et al. 2020). In particular, Wang et al. (2024) demonstrated the agricultural applicability of AOS (DP 3) produced by AlyC7, a PL7 family alginate lyase from Vibrio sp. C42. The prepared AOS increased root lengths in various plants from 9.7 up to 27.5%. This approach provides a solid foundation for the industrial and agricultural utilisation of AlyC7 (Wang et al. 2024). In another approach, AOS enhanced salt tolerance in rice by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and improving stem diameter, root number, and biomass under salt stress. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed that AOS regulated genes involved in antioxidant activity, photosynthesis, and cell wall synthesis, while increasing metabolites associated with antioxidant properties. This study highlighted AOS's role in alleviating salt stress‐induced damage in rice (Du et al. 2023). AOS can also enhance plant resistance against pathogenic attacks. Plants identify pathogens through molecules or molecular fragments that have structures or chemical patterns similar to those of the pathogens. These molecules are known as pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Oligosaccharides from external sources, which possess structures resembling pathogens, act as PAMPs to trigger the immune system (Zhang, Wang, et al. 2020). When AOS (average DP 6.8), produced by alginate lyase from Flavobacterium sp. LXA, were applied to soybean cotyledons, they induced the production of phytoalexins. This indicates that AOS acted as PAMPs on soybean cotyledons (An et al. 2009). In an experiment conducted on tomato seedlings, AOS stimulated the plant's natural defence system by inducing phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL) activity and promoting the accumulation of phenolic compounds. These phenolic compounds possess antioxidant properties, playing a key role in inhibiting pathogen invasion and enhancing the plant's immune response. The results showed that AOS treatment increased PAL activity starting at 12 h, with a significant rise in polyphenol levels after 24 h, contributing to enhanced disease resistance in tomatoes (Aitouguinane et al. 2020).
Alginate and its degraded products can be converted into various value‐added chemicals through microbial fermentation (Table 2) (Wargacki et al. 2012; Hobbs et al. 2016). This application involves providing DEH, the final monomeric compound degraded by alginate lyase, as a substrate (Hobbs et al. 2016) and using microbial hosts that express alginate lyase either natively or heterologously to directly degrade and convert alginate into value‐added compounds (Takeda et al. 2011; Wargacki et al. 2012; Enquist‐Newman et al. 2014; Takagi et al. 2017; Lim et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2024; Moon et al. 2024). While early studies focused on bioethanol production from alginate and its degraded products (Takeda et al. 2011; Wargacki et al. 2012; Enquist‐Newman et al. 2014; Takagi et al. 2017), recent studies have diversified the target value‐added chemicals to include 2,3‐butanediol, citramalate, itaconate, and 3‐hydroxypropionic acid. Additionally, the successful synthesis of lycopene, renowned for its antioxidant properties, underscores the potential of alginate‐derived pathways in the dietary supplements market and food industry (Kang et al. 2022; Lee et al. 2024; Moon et al. 2024). Collectively, given the high industrial value of alginate‐degraded products, which find applications in areas ranging from agriculture to the biorefinery industry, efficient alginate degradation using alginate lyase holds great promise.
TABLE 2.
Bioconversion of alginate and DEH into value‐added chemicals through microbial fermentation.
| Alginate source | Microorganisms | Product | Titre | Yield | Maximum productivity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Nacalai Tesque) | Metabolically modified Sphingomonas sp. A1 | Ethanol | 13.0 g/L | — | 343 mg/L/h | Takeda et al. (2011) |
| Saccharina japonica | Metabolically modified Escherichia coli | Ethanol | 4.7% (v/v) | 0.281 weight ethanol/weight dry macroalgae | — | Wargacki et al. (2012) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | Metabolically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Ethanol | 4.6% (v/v) (36.2 g/L) | 83% of the maximum theoretical yield | 1.9 g/L/h | Enquist‐Newman et al. (2014) |
| Commercial sodium alginate | Metabolically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Ethanol | 8.8 g/L | 32% of the maximum theoretical yield | — | Takagi et al. (2017) |
| Commercial sodium alginate | Co‐culutre of Vibrio sp. dhg and Metabolically modified E. coli | 3‐hydroxypropionic acid | 293.55 m g/L | — | — | Kang et al. (2022) |
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Junsei Chemical Co.) | Metabolically modified Vibrio sp. dhg | Citramalate | 9.8 g/L | 0.47 g/g (57% of maximum theoretical yield) | 0.20 g/L/h | Lee et al. (2024) |
| Saccharina japonica | 8.7 g/L | — | — | |||
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Junsei Chemical Co.) | Metabolically modified Vibrio sp. dhg | Itaconate | 2.5 g/L | 0.13 g/g | — | Moon et al. (2024) |
| Saccharina japonica | 1.5 g/L | 0.08 g/g | — | |||
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | Metabolically modified Vibrio sp. dhg | Ethanol | 25.7 g/L | 64% of maximum theoretical yield | 1.8 g/L/h | Lim et al. (2019) |
| Kelp powder | 19.2 g/L | 63% of maximum theoretical yield | 0.80 g/L/h | |||
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | 2,3‐butanediol (including acetoin) | 31.3 g/L | 81% of maximum theoretical yield | 1.3 g/L/h | ||
| Commercial sodium alginate (from Sigma‐Aldrich) | lycopene | 6.2 mg/L | — | — |
3. Discovery and Characterisation of Alginate Lyases
Given the numerous benefits of enzymatic alginate degradation, there is a sustained focus on producing AOS and DEH using alginate lyases and advancing this process for industrial applications. This section covers the efforts to discover novel alginate lyases and their applications.
3.1. Alginate Lyases With Metal Ion Resistance
Metal ions interact with amine or carboxylic acid groups of amino acids within the alginate lyases, which can either inhibit or enhance the activity of the enzymes (Ferdhous et al. 2022). Since marine biomass processing often occurs in environments where various metal ions are present, stability in such conditions is important for industrial applications of alginate lyase (Gao et al. 2018; Ferdhous et al. 2022). For instance, Alyw202 from Vibrio sp. W2, which belongs to PL family 7 and alginate lyase superfamily 2, demonstrated a significant increase in activity, with around 200% and 180% boost in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and Co2+, respectively, and also showed slight activation with Fe2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+. Moreover, Alyw202 maintained its activity even at high metal ion concentrations, such as 10 mM, without complete inhibition (Ma et al. 2020). Similarly, a PL family 6 alginate lyase, TsAly6A from Thalassomonas sp. LD5, exhibited a 177% and 136% increase in enzyme activity with Ca2+ and Mg2+, respectively, while other ions such as Li+, Ba2+, and K+ exerted minimal inhibitory effects. The observed activation by Ca2+ and Mg2+ is likely attributable to their coordination with specific amino acid residues within the enzyme (Gao et al. 2018). Chen et al. (2023) reported TAPL7B, identified as a PL7 family alginate lyase from Thalassotalea algicola, which was activated by a wide range of metal ions, including Ca2+, K+, Na+, Ni+, Cu2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Co2+, and Fe3+. Notably, TAPL7B exhibited a remarkable increase in activity under 1.2 mM Ca2+ conditions (Chen et al. 2023). The pronounced metal ion tolerance of these alginate lyases makes them highly suitable for industrial applications, as they can efficiently degrade alginate in ion‐rich environments.
3.2. Alginate Lyases With Dual Endolytic and Exolytic Activities
Several studies have identified alginate lyases with dual endolytic and exolytic activities, enabling the complete breakdown of alginate into products ranging from oligosaccharides to monosaccharides, thus facilitating efficient saccharification (Chu et al. 2020). A novel alginate lyase, Alg17B, which was isolated from a marine bacterium inhabiting decomposing Sargassum, exhibited dual activity, degrading alginate into DEH or AOS with a DP of 2–6 (Huang et al. 2019). Chu et al. (2020) identified a novel alginate lyase with dual activity, KJ‐2, from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia KJ‐2 (Chu et al. 2020). Furthermore, by comparing the crystal structure with the previously characterised exolytic alginate lyase Alg17c (Kim et al. 2012), they predicted that four amino acid residues in KJ‐2 (Tyr238, Arg241, Arg418, and Glu644) were crucial in forming the active site and participating in hydrogen bonding with the substrate. Introducing site‐specific mutations to Arg241 and Glu644 decreased exolytic activity, thereby confirming the key residues for the enzyme's exolytic function. Dual active alginate lyases are highly advantageous for industrial applications. They are crucial for processes like biofuel production from seaweed biomass, where thorough depolymerisation is necessary to produce fermentable sugars and valuable biochemicals.
3.3. Alginate Lyases with Broad Substrate Specificity
Since brown macroalgae, the primary source of alginate, have varying compositions of M and G depending on the harvest season and species, alginate lyases with broad substrate specificity are essential to efficiently extract alginate from brown macroalgae (Schiener et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 2022). These enzymes enable proficient and complete alginate breakdown, maximising substrate utilisation (Yagi et al. 2016). Gu et al. (2024) identified Aly448, an alginate lyase with broad substrate specificity, from a metagenomic library of macroalgae collected in Indonesia (Gu et al. 2024). They figured out that Aly448 has binding sites for alginate, polyG, and polyM substrates. Lu et al. (2019) characterised a novel endo‐lyase AlyPB1 and a novel exo‐lyase AlyPB2 from a marine bacterium, Photobacterium sp. FC61 (Lu et al. 2019). Particularly, AlyPB2 showed activity towards both polyG and polyM, while AlyPB1 only had activity towards polyG. Although having a broad substrate activity could bring about less specificity, it could reduce the need for multiple alginate lyases and individual optimisation, thereby enhancing the efficiency and cost‐effectiveness of industrial alginate degradation.
3.4. Thermophilic Alginate Lyases
The discovery of thermophilic alginate lyases, which exhibit greater durability and stability at high temperatures (above approximately 50°C), is particularly noteworthy. Alginate degradation at high temperatures offers several industrial advantages, including lower viscosity of alginate, prevention of bacterial contamination, and compatibility with commercially available cellulase that has optimal activity at high temperatures (Rhein‐Knudsen et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021). Recently, two thermophilic alginate lyases of the PL6 family, AlyRmA and AlyRmB from Rhodothermus marinus , which exhibit optimal activity at 70°C, were characterised (Zhu et al. 2024). Their primary protein structures suggest that their thermal resistance may be attributed to the high content of proline and arginine (Watanabe et al. 1994). Due to its superior metal ion tolerance and stability compared to AlyRmA, AlyRmB was selected for AOS production in this study. As a result, AlyRmB produced 0.42 g/L of AOS with a DP 2–6, degrading 0.5% (w/v) alginate over 10 h (Zhu et al. 2024). Another thermostable alginate lyase identified from a metagenomic data set using the dbCAN data server were employed for one‐step saccharification of brown macroalga in combination with commercial cellulase. The enzyme mixture of endolytic AMOR_PL7 (optimal at 65°C), exolytic AMOR_PL17 (optimal at 50°C), and commercial cellulase mixture Cellic CTec2 (optimal at 45°C ~ 50°C) effectively yielded glucose, mannitol, and DEH from Saccharina latissima at 55°C (Rhein‐Knudsen et al. 2021).
4. Advancements in Production and Application of Alginate Lyases
4.1. Heterologous Expression Systems for Enhancing Production of Alginate Lyase
Since alginate lyases are naturally produced by non‐platform strains, their low yield limits their harvest and industrial exploitation. To maximise the diverse properties and advantages of alginate lyases from various species, platform strains can be utilised as expression hosts. Exploiting the characteristics of these strains could enhance alginate lyase yield, thereby increasing the production of AOS and DEH. For instance, E. coli offers significant benefits, including robust growth, cost‐effective large‐scale fermentation, and high protein synthesis efficiency, enhancing alginate lyase productivity (Zhang et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2019; Depping et al. 2022; Falak et al. 2022). In addition, Bacillus subtilis and Yarrowia lipolytica are highly valued in industrial applications for their strong secretion of heterologous enzymes and proteins, ease of genetic manipulation, and well‐characterised genetic systems, making them ideal workhorses for industrial and pharmaceutical uses (Madzak et al. 2004; Madzak 2015; Yagi et al. 2016; Cui et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2023). However, most studies have focused on heterologous alginate lyase expression, primarily assessing the performance of the recombinant enzymes (Zheng et al. 2023). At best, the efforts were limited to optimising the culture conditions to enhance the catalytic activity. Meng et al. (2021) characterised a new PL7 family alginate lyase, Aly01, derived from Vibrio natriegens SK42.001, and enhanced its yield through heterologous expression in Terrific Broth (TB) medium supplemented with 120 mM glycine and 10 mM calcium (Meng et al. 2021). Similarly, Zheng et al. (2023) focused on overexpressing Alg62, classified as PL7 family, from Vibrio alginolyticus in B. subtilis WB600, determining that the optimal medium for maximum activity included 15 g/L glycerol, 25 g/L yeast extract, and 1.5 mM K+ (Zheng et al. 2023). Therefore, maximising the potential of platform strains with diverse advantages could further increase the yield of alginate lyases.
In this regard, incorporating host‐compatible signal peptides is beneficial, as it is crucial for protein secretion and localisation (Owji et al. 2018). The alginate lyase derived from Vibrio sp. QY102 was expressed in E. coli by replacing its native signal peptide with the signal peptide sequence from the ompA gene in E. coli (Sun et al. 2019). The extracellular enzyme activity of alginate lyase with the ompA signal peptide averaged 350 U/mL, which is approximately 1.5 to 6 times higher than that with the native signal peptide. A similar strategy was reported using alginate lyase AlyC7, classified within the PL7 family, from Vibrio sp. C42, which exhibited high activity, broad substrate specificity, and high yields of trimers (Wang et al. 2024). The authors integrated five different signal peptides in the type II secretion pathway of E. coli (the pelB, malE, ompA, phoA, and ompT genes) to efficiently produce AlyC in E. coli . Among them, AlyC7 combined with the pelB signal peptide achieved the highest yield of 1122.8 U/mL after 27 h of cultivation in LB medium.
Collectively, it has been confirmed that using the appropriate expression host and signal peptide can improve protein expression and secretion efficiency, resulting in significant technical contributions to large‐scale production of alginate lyases. Additionally, engineering signal peptides to enhance secretion efficiency would further accelerate the economic feasibility of alginate lyase production and alginate degradation process.
4.2. Utilisation of Crude Enzyme From Alginate‐Degrading Microorganisms
To reduce enzyme purification costs (Zhang et al. 2024), recent efforts have focused on using crude enzymes from alginate lyase‐producing microorganisms for alginate degradation. Using crude enzymes also offers the advantage of simultaneously utilising multiple alginate lyases with diverse substrate specificities and cleavage modes. Gomaa et al. (2018) utilised crude enzymes from the culture supernatant of the marine fungus Dendryphiella arenaria to degrade crude alginate extracted from Sargassum latifolium for biofuel production. The crude enzyme converted 1 g of crude alginate into around 440 mg of reduced sugars (Gomaa et al. 2018). Similarly, crude enzymes from Pseudoalteromonas sp. Alg6B were used to produce AOS from Saccharina japonica. Combined with commercial cellulase, this study achieved a degradation rate of 97% for Saccharina japonica, producing AOS with a DP of 2 and 4 (Sun et al. 2020). In addition, crude enzymes from Vibrio sp. B1Z05, containing 17 different alginate lyases, were used to produce AOS with DP 2–6 from Saccharina japonica (Zhang et al. 2024).
4.3. Immobilisation of Alginate Lyases
Immobilising the enzyme on a solid matrix has shown advantages over using the free enzyme, including improved stability and reusability of the enzymes (Maghraby et al. 2023). A study has explored the use of mesoporous titanium oxide particles (MTOPs) to enhance the thermal stability and reusability of alginate lyase (Li, Hu, et al. 2020). The authors reported that immobilising AlyPL6 from Pedobacter hainanensis NJ‐02 on MTOPs maintained 84% of its initial activity after being heated at 45°C for 1 h, compared to only 9.6% for the free enzyme, demonstrating a significant improvement in thermal stability. Furthermore, the immobilised enzyme retained 75% and 54% of its initial activity after 5 and 10 cycles of reuse, respectively (Li, Hu, et al. 2020). In another study, Tanaka et al. (2022) immobilised the endolytic AlyFRA (PL7 family) and the exolytic AlyFRB (PL15 family) from Falsirhodobacter sp. alg1 onto κ‐carrageenan, which was used as a support material, to produce DEH. These lyases degrade alginate into unsaturated uronate monomers, which are then converted to DEH. The immobilised enzymes achieved an 80% DEH yield after seven cycles of reuse, highlighting the potential for a cost‐effective production process Tanaka et al. 2022.
5. Protein Engineering of Alginate Lyases
5.1. Domain Truncation of Alginate Lyase
The truncation of the specific domain is guided by the enzyme's resolved structure. Most alginate lyases consist of catalytic domains (CD) and non‐catalytic domains (NCD), which include the carbohydrate‐binding module (CBM). Although CBM does not directly catalyse reactions, it crucially determines enzyme functionality (Várnai et al. 2013). Thus, truncation of the domain could result in changes in the enzyme's performance, including alterations in substrate affinity, catalytic activity, and thermal stability of the alginate lyases (Hu et al. 2019; Yan et al. 2019; Yang Li, et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019) (Table 3). Yang, Li, et al. (2019) analysed domains of AlyM, classified as PL7 family, from Microbulbifer sp. CGMCC 14061 by comparing its sequence within its genomic database. Subsequently, they generated various truncated AlyM variants by reconstructing its domains. Among them, cAlyM, containing only the CD, showed the highest enzymatic activity of approximately 390 U/mg, representing a 6.3‐fold increase compared to the full‐length AlyM. The mutant also exhibited significantly enhanced thermal stability, retaining nearly 70% of the enzymatic activity at 45°C. Interestingly, AlyMΔ58C, with the F5/8 type C domain—known for its roles in protein–protein interactions and one of CBM (Ficko‐Blean and Boraston 2006)—removed, demonstrated a higher affinity for polyM, whereas the intact AlyM preferentially bound to polyG (Yang, Li, et al. 2019). This mutant can be utilised to produce AOS with mannuronate at the reducing end, such as pentaM and pentaG.
TABLE 3.
Engineering strategies for alginate lyases.
| Enzyme | Source of the enzyme | Strategy | Result of engineering | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlyM | Microbulbifer sp. CGMCC 14061 | Reconstructing CD | Improved thermal stability, substrate affinity, and catalytic efficiency | Yang, Li, et al. (2019) |
| AlgH‐I | Marinimicrobium sp. H1 | Truncating NCD | Improved thermal stability, pH stability, and salt tolerance | Yan et al. (2019) |
| TsAly7B | Thalassomonas sp. LD5 | Reconstructing CD | Improved thermal stability, catalytic efficiency, and regulating the products distribution | Zhang et al. (2019) |
| Aly7C | Vibrio sp. W13 | Constructing a hybrid enzyme by recombining modules | Improved catalytic efficiency and catalytic efficiency | Hu, Cao et al. (2021) |
| AlyRm6A‐Zu7 | AlyRM6A from Rhodothermus marinus 4252 & AlyZu7 from Zobellia uliginosa | Constructing a hybrid enzyme by recombining modules | Improved thermal stability and achieving bifunctional catalytic capability | Guo et al. (2024) |
| FlAlyA | Flavobacterium sp. UMI‐01 | Prediction of mutation sites by B‐factor and free energy change | Improved thermal stability and expression efficiency | Zhang et al. (2022) |
| AlyRm6A | Rhodothermus marinus 4252 | Prediction of mutation sites by free energy change | Improved thermal stability | Guo et al. (2023) |
| AlyMc | Microbulbifer sp. Q7 | Prediction of mutation sites by B‐factor and free energy change | Improved thermal stability | Cui et al. (2024) |
| AlgL‐CD | Pseudoalteromonas sp. zb‐7 | Substituting residues near the active site to alkaline amino acid | Improved substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency | Xu et al. (2021) |
| AlgL‐CD | Pseudoalteromonas sp. aly – SJ02 | Targeting the lid loop and sites at the predicted substrate entrance | Improved thermal stability and catalytic efficiency | Su et al. (2021) |
| AlyG2 | Seonamhaeicola algicola | Substitution of residues with bulky steric hindrance close to the active pocket and prediction of mutation sites by free energy change | Improved thermal stability and catalytic efficiency | Huang et al. (2024) |
| cAlyM | Microbulbifer sp. Q7 | Prediction of potential sites of disulfide bond formation using dynamic simlations | Improved thermal stability | Yang, Yang, et al. (2019) |
| Alg‐2 | Tamlana sp. S12 | Error‐prone PCR | Improved substrate affinity | Shu et al. (2019) |
| FsAly7 | Flammeovirga sp. | Error‐prone PCR | Improved thermal stabilit | Jiang et al. (2025) |
Yan et al. (2019) identified the protein domains of AlgH, classified as PL7 family, from Marinimicrobium sp. H1 using a similar strategy, and investigated the impacts of removing NCDs in AlgH (Yan et al. 2019). AlgH‐I containing only the CD exhibited significantly improved thermal stability, preserving 80% and 75% of its activity after 2 h of incubation at 40°C and 50°C, respectively, while the full‐length AlgH retained only 10% of its activity under the same conditions. Moreover, AlgH‐I showed 2.1 times higher catalytic activity than AlgH, without any change in substrate preference (Yan et al. 2019).
Furthermore, elucidating the function of modules can provide valuable insights for engineering and developing alginate lyases. The PL7 family alginate lyase TsAly7B from the marine bacterium Thalassomonas sp. LD5 was identified, and its CBM and CD were characterised using sequence analysis tools (Zhang et al. 2019). The enzyme was predicted to contain two types of CBMs (CBM9 and CBM32) and a CD. In alginate lyase, CBM32s are key in recognising alginate and influencing the composition of degradation products. In contrast, the specific role of CBM9 in alginate lyases remains unclear and is yet to be fully understood. To figure out the functionality of CBM9, truncated mutants TM1 (containing CBM32 and CD), TM2 (containing CBM9 and CD), and TM3 (containing only CD) were constructed. Experimental results demonstrated that both CBM9 and CBM32 facilitated alginate degradation, with TM2 exhibiting a specific activity 7.6 times higher than TM3. The team successfully demonstrated the functionality of CBM9 for the first time (Zhang et al. 2019).
While these approaches highlight the potential of studying this domain to develop more efficient and robust alginate lyases for industrial applications, truncation may cause undesirable conformational changes that affect functionality (Kittur et al. 2003; Hu et al. 2019). Moreover, deleting the conserved NCDs could be detrimental, reducing substrate activity and potentially leading to loss of function (Hu et al. 2019). As truncating NCDs relies on the resolved enzyme structure, it is essential to consider structural information and stability when constructing mutant enzymes.
5.2. Chimeric Alginate Lyase Construction
Enzymes are composed of several modules, each presenting distinct functionalities. By recombining these modules, particularly from different alginate lyases, it is possible to create hybrid enzymes with improved properties such as enhanced catalytic efficiency, substrate specificity, or stability (Yan et al. 2019; Yang, Li, et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019; Hu, Cao, et al. 2021; Guo et al. 2024). Such engineered enzymes could offer significant advantages in industrial applications, where tailored enzymatic activity is crucial (Abascal and Valencia 2003).
Recombination of conserved domains could improve functionality by integrating superior structural components (Hu, Cao et al. 2021; Guo et al. 2024). Hu et al. (2021) aimed to prepare AOS by hybridising the domains of the PL7 family alginate lyases Aly7A and Aly7B (Hu, Cao, et al. 2021), previously identified from Vibrio sp. W13 (Zhu et al. 2015, 2019; Hu et al. 2019). Sequence alignment within the PL7 family revealed that Aly7A possessed an N‐terminal CBM and a C‐terminal catalytic module. Aly7B contained two unique catalytic modules absent in any other lyases in the family. The researchers observed a significant decrease in Aly7A's activity upon the removal of its CBM, indicating that the CBM plays a pivotal role in enzymatic function. Among the possible combinations, the hybrid enzyme Aly7C, which incorporates Aly7A's CBM and Aly7B's catalytic module, demonstrated higher thermal stability and maximal activity at 40°C and pH 9.0 (Hu, Cao, et al. 2021). In contrast, Aly7B‐CDII, a previously developed truncated enzyme of Aly7B, exhibited maximal activity at 35°C and pH 9.0 (Hu et al. 2019). Additionally, Aly7C could degrade sodium alginate, polyM, and polyG into oligosaccharides with DP of 2–5, demonstrating a broad range of product specificity. Despite the novel hybrid enzyme's enhanced performance, the underlying cause remains unexplained. Developing a universal rationale and strategy could facilitate advancements in other alginate lyases, thereby improving bioprocessing efficiency.
Furthermore, Guo et al. (2024) successfully constructed a multifunctional enzyme by recombining the endoactive and thermostable PL6 family AlyRm6A from Rhodothermus marinus 4252 with the exoactive PL7 family AlyZu7 from Zobellia uliginosa and elucidated the cause by structural analysis (Guo et al. 2024). The team identified conserved domains of AlyZu7 and selected key residues for fusion with AlyRm6A via the linker. The resulting hybrid enzyme, AlyRm6A‐Zu7, maintained approximately 90% of its activity after incubation at temperatures ranging from 30°C to 50°C. Product analysis showed that AlyRm6A‐Zu7 produced more products (DP 1–4 and DEH) than the mixture of AlyZu7 and AlyRm6A, and significantly higher amounts of DP 1 and DEH compared to AlyZu7 at 25°C. Structural analysis using AlphaFold2 suggested that the enhanced protein–protein interactions between AlyRm6A‐Zu7 and its substrate potentially increased protein stability. This mutant exhibited excellent thermostability and dual endo‐ and exo‐activity, making it a valuable biocatalyst for industrial applications (Guo et al. 2024). These studies demonstrate that combining domains from different alginate lyases can induce a synergistic effect, offering promising strategies for enzyme engineering and application.
5.3. Computer‐Aided Rational Design
When the structure and function of the target protein are understood, rational structure‐based protein design becomes a promising approach (Narad et al. 2023). Site‐directed mutagenesis is frequently used to investigate the role of a specific amino acid in the context of the entire protein (Siloto and Weselake 2012). Traditionally, it enabled the evaluation of a specific residue's role in the catalytic activity of alginate lyases (Yamamoto et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2015). With advancements in computer‐aided rational design, more precise site‐directed mutagenesis considering structural information can now be applied to engineer alginate lyases.
When introducing a mutation to an enzyme, calculating changes in free energy (ΔΔG) upon mutation and predicting the dynamic changes caused by the mutation helps decide the alteration in the enzyme's stability and functionality (Musil et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2022; Guo et al. 2023; Cui et al. 2024). Zhang et al. (2022) aimed to enhance the thermal stability and expression yield of FlAlyA, a PL7 family alginate lyase from Flavobacterium sp. UMI‐01 characterised in 2014 (Inoue et al. 2014). They calculated the B‐factor values, which indicate the dynamic flexibility of each atom in the protein (Mlynek et al. 2024), to assess protein stability and selected potential mutation sites through calculation of ΔΔG (Zhang et al. 2022). Among the mutants, H176D and H71K showed improvements in thermal stability, with melting point increased by 1.2°C and 0.3°C, respectively. At 50°C, the half‐lives of these mutants were extended by 7.6 min and 1.7 min, respectively. The H71K mutation particularly exhibited comprehensive performance enhancements over the wild‐type, including better expression levels, thermal stability, and specific activity. To investigate the molecular mechanisms behind the increased thermostability of the mutants, molecular dynamic simulations were conducted. The results indicated that the enhanced stability of H71K was due to the formation of new hydrogen bonds and a reduction in the solvent‐accessible surface area (Zhang et al. 2022).
Similarly, Guo et al. (2023) focused on engineering AlyRm6A, a novel PL6 family alginate lyase from Rhodothermus marinus , which naturally exhibits high thermostability (Guo et al. 2023). To enhance the thermostability of AlyRm6A while preserving its catalytic activity, the researchers calculated the ΔΔG values to compare protein stability after mutagenesis, identifying optimal mutation sites for improved thermal stability. Their rational design predicted and confirmed that single‐point mutants T43I and Q216I displayed enhanced thermostability, with respective half‐life increases of 20% and 25% (Guo et al. 2023). Structural analysis of the WT and mutants revealed that T43I and Q216I formed new and strong hydrophobic interactions with nearby amino acid residues, explaining the enhanced thermostability of these mutants. Unfortunately, to alleviate workload, the team eliminated most mutation points due to the lack of accurate computer‐aided verification of beneficial mutations, potentially discarding more advantageous mutants.
Moreover, Cui et al. (2024) focused on enhancing the thermal resilience of the PL7 family alginate lyase AlyMc from Microbulbifer sp. Q7. They calculated B‐factor and ΔΔG values to assess protein stability and introduced site‐specific mutations to generate and evaluate mutants for thermal stability (Cui et al. 2024). The resulting mutants, Q246V and K249V, exhibited significant improvements, with thermal half‐lives of 3.9 h and 3.7 h, respectively, compared to that of 2.4 h of the wild‐type AlyMc. The team argued that favourable changes in electrostatic charges on the surface of the mutants enhanced the thermal stability of AlyMc, as charged amino acids on the protein surface can form a protective network through electrostatic interactions.
Another approach focuses on the reaction mechanism to select desirable mutations (Yang, Yang, et al. 2019; Su et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2024). Xu et al. (2021) applied this approach to the endo‐type PL18 family alginate lyase from Pseudoalteromonas sp. aly‐SJ02, identified in 2011 (Li et al. 2011; Dong et al. 2014). They aimed to enhance its substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency by introducing single‐point mutations near the active site to improve substrate affinity and study the enzyme's structure–function relationship (Xu et al. 2021). Specifically, they designed AlgL‐CD mutants by substituting acidic amino acid residues near the active site with basic ones. The E226K mutant exhibited a 10‐fold increase in substrate affinity compared to the wild‐type. Structural analysis of the E226K mutant revealed that it had more flexible lid loops, thereby increasing substrate binding affinity (Xu et al. 2021).
Subsequently, Su et al. (2021) further engineered the E226K mutant (Xu et al. 2021) to enhance its catalytic efficiency and thermal stability (Su et al. 2021). Focusing on the enzyme's mechanism, they targeted the lid loop and sites at the predicted substrate entrance. Given the high polarity of the alginate substrate, the researchers hypothesised that the lid loop's polarity would significantly impact functionality. They replaced hydrophobic residues with polar ones and substituted bulky residues at the entrance with smaller ones. The resultant triple mutant, E226K/I211T/R294V, showed a 4.8‐fold increase in catalytic efficiency and a substantial improvement in thermal stability, with the half‐life at 45°C increasing from 89 min to 560 min. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the mutant had a more flexible loop and a wider substrate entrance, which facilitated efficient proton transfer and enhanced enzymatic activity (Su et al. 2021).
A similar strategy was employed to engineer the alginate lyase AlyG2 from Seonamhaeicola algicola, which was characterised previously (Yun et al. 2024), to enhance its thermal stability and catalytic efficiency (Huang et al. 2024). The main strategy was to increase specific activity by substituting residues with bulky steric hindrance near the active pocket (T91S). The T91S mutant exhibited a 1.9‐fold increase in specific activity compared to the wild‐type (Huang et al. 2024). Moreover, to enhance the thermal stability of T91S, mutants with negative ΔΔG values in the thermal flexibility region were selected. Among them, the S72Ya mutant demonstrated an 18% increase in specific activity and improved thermal stability compared to T91S, with a 31% increase in relative activity after a 1‐h incubation at 42°C. To understand the improvement, the team conducted molecular dynamics and found that S72Ya showed reduced surface loop flexibility and more stable hydrogen bonds.
Moreover, Yang, Yang, et al. (2019) applied this approach to the previously modified alginate lyase cAlyM, derived from AlyM of Microbulbifer sp. Q7 (Ficko‐Blean and Boraston 2006). Using molecular dynamics simulations, they rationally assessed the structural stability of cAlyM and predicted potential sites for disulfide bond formation to effectively enhance protein thermal stability (Mansfeld et al. 1997; Yang, Yang, et al. 2019). Of the six mutants constructed, five successfully formed new disulfide bonds. Notably, the D102C‐A300C and G103C‐T113C mutants exhibited half‐lives of 4.2 h and 3.1 h at 45°C, respectively. Additionally, the D102C‐A300C mutant showed a specific activity 1.1 times higher than that of cAlyM and improved thermal stability, making it a promising candidate for meeting the industrial demand for the preparation of AOS (Yang, Yang, et al. 2019).
These studies demonstrate that targeted mutations, guided by thermodynamics and molecular dynamic predictions, can significantly enhance the performance of alginate lyases. Using structural stability assessments can improve specific activity and thermal stability, showing great potential for developing industrially valuable biocatalysts for AOS and DEH preparation. Integrating computer‐aided rational engineering and targeted mutations can induce beneficial structural changes, resulting in more robust and efficient enzymes for the exploitation of brown macroalgae.
5.4. Directed Evolution
While computer‐aided design has refined mutagenesis sites for alginate lyase engineering, it is limited to enzymes with known structural information. Directed evolution has been widely utilised to enhance the activity, stability, and industrial applicability of alginate lyases. Various strategies, including error‐prone PCR, iterative mutagenesis, and combinatorial mutagenesis, have been employed to optimise enzyme performance (Mansfeld et al. 1997; Yang, Yang et al. 2019).
Shu et al. (2019) applied error‐prone PCR to improve the PL7 family alginate lyase Alg‐2 from Tamlana sp. S12, identifying two mutants with 160% and 240% higher enzymatic activity than the wild‐type (Shu et al. 2019). The P2‐81 mutant exhibited a 50% reduction in Km, indicating improved substrate affinity, with key amino acid substitutions (Glu, Thr, Ser, Asp, and Tyr) contributing to enhanced activity. Similarly, iterative rounds of mutagenesis and selection were performed on PL7 family FsAly7 from Flammeovirga sp., leading to a 10% increase in catalytic efficiency, a shift in optimal temperature from 40°C to 50°C, and enhanced thermal stability, making it more suitable for industrial applications (Jiang et al. 2025). Additionally, error‐prone PCR identified mutants with 20% lower Km and a 1.5‐fold increase in specific activity, further improving substrate affinity and enzyme efficiency.
These studies collectively demonstrate the power of directed evolution in improving alginate lyases, enabling more efficient bioconversion of alginate‐rich biomass and expanding their industrial potential in bioprocessing, biofuel production, and marine biomass utilisation.
6. Future Perspectives and Challenges
Alginate lyases show significant potential for producing AOS and DEH, with promising applications in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and value‐added chemical production. Recent advancements in the discovery and characterisation of alginate lyases have brought us closer to enhancing AOS and DEH productivity. However, challenges such as instability at high temperatures and low catalytic activity must be addressed to optimise production. Identifying new enzymes with superior performance and advancing protein engineering techniques are crucial steps in overcoming these hurdles. These technological improvements have not only increased production efficiency but also expanded the application scope of alginate lyases.
Optimising industrial processes involving alginate lyases requires a thorough evaluation of analytical techniques and alginate properties. Current methods for separating and characterising AOS and DEH, including chromatography, mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance, are time‐consuming and costly, posing challenges for the industrialisation of alginate lyase‐based processes (Cheng et al. 2020). Furthermore, the properties of alginate, primarily derived from brown macroalgae, vary depending on the species, harvest time, and growth location, necessitating standardised enzymatic degradation processes tailored to specific alginate characteristics.
By addressing these challenges and fully leveraging the potential of alginate lyases, we can successfully achieve improvements in the efficiency and sustainability of industrial processes. In the biorefinery sector, alginate lyases can play a pivotal role in converting brown macroalgae into valuable biofuels and biochemicals, contributing to a more sustainable and circular economy. Continued investment in research and development will unlock new applications and drive innovation, positioning alginate lyases as key biocatalysts for a sustainable future.
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation, H.J.S., J.H.M., S.W., C.W.L., G.Y.J., H.G.L.; investigation, H.J.S., J.H.M., C.W.L.; supervision and validation, G.Y.J., H.G.L.; writing – original draft, H.J.S., J.H.M., S.W., C.W.L., G.Y.J., H.G.L.; H.J.S. and J.H.M. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding from Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion (RS‐2022‐KS221581); National Research Foundation of Korea (RS‐2024‐00334792, RS‐2024‐00399277; RS‐2024‐00400033; RS‐2024‐00453085).
Funding: This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea, RS‐2024‐00334792, RS‐2024‐00399277, RS‐2024‐00400033, RS‐2024‐00453085. Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion, RS‐2022‐KS221581.
Hyo Jeong Shin and Jo Hyun Moon contributed equally.
Contributor Information
Gyoo Yeol Jung, Email: gyjung@postech.ac.kr.
Hyun Gyu Lim, Email: hyungyu.lim@inha.ac.kr.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
References
- Abascal, F. , and Valencia A.. 2003. “Automatic Annotation of Protein Function Based on Family Identification.” Proteins 53: 683–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aitouguinane, M. , Bouissil S., Mouhoub A., et al. 2020. “Induction of Natural Defenses in Tomato Seedlings by Using Alginate and Oligoalginates Derivatives Extracted From Moroccan Brown Algae.” Marine Drugs 18: 521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- An, Q. D. , Zhang G. L., Wu H. T., et al. 2009. “Alginate‐Deriving Oligosaccharide Production by Alginase From Newly Isolated Flavobacterium sp. LXA and Its Potential Application in Protection Against Pathogens.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 106: 161–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arntzen, M. Ø. , Pedersen B., Klau L. J., et al. 2021. “Alginate Degradation: Insights Obtained Through Characterization of a Thermophilic Exolytic Alginate Lyase.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 87. 10.1128/AEM.02399-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arroyo, B. J. , Bezerra A. C., Oliveira L. L., Arroyo S. J., de Melo E. A., and Santos A. M. P.. 2020. “Antimicrobial Active Edible Coating of Alginate and Chitosan Add ZnO Nanoparticles Applied in Guavas (Psidium guajava L.).” Food Chemistry 309: 125566. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asadpoor, M. , Ithakisiou G.‐N., van Putten J. P. M., Pieters R. J., Folkerts G., and Braber S.. 2021. “Antimicrobial Activities of Alginate and Chitosan Oligosaccharides Against Staphylococcus Aureus and Group B Streptococcus.” Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 700605. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.700605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bose, S. K. , Howlader P., Jia X., Wang W., and Yin H.. 2019. “Alginate Oligosaccharide Postharvest Treatment Preserve Fruit Quality and Increase Storage Life via Abscisic Acid Signaling in Strawberry.” Food Chemistry 283: 665–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouillon, G. A. , Gåserød O., and Rattray F. P.. 2019. “Evaluation of the Inhibitory Effect of Alginate Oligosaccharide on Yeast and Mould in Yoghurt.” International Dairy Journal 99: 104554. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C. , Cao S., Zhu B., Jiang L., and Yao Z.. 2023. “Biochemical Characterization and Elucidation the Degradation Pattern of a New Cold‐Adapted and Ca2+ Activated Alginate Lyase for Efficient Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides.” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 162: 110146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J. , Hu Y., Zhang L., et al. 2017. “Alginate Oligosaccharide DP5 Exhibits Antitumor Effects in Osteosarcoma Patients Following Surgery.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 8: 623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, P. , Zhu Y., Men Y., Zeng Y., and Sun Y.. 2018. “Purification and Characterization of a Novel Alginate Lyase From the Marine Bacterium Bacillus sp. Alg07.” Marine Drugs 16: 86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, D. , Jiang C., Xu J., Liu Z., and Mao X.. 2020. “Characteristics and Applications of Alginate Lyases: A Review.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 164: 1304–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chu, Y. J. , Kim H. S., Kim M. S., Lee E. Y., and Kim H. S.. 2020. “Functional Characterization of a Novel Oligoalginate Lyase of Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia KJ‐2 Using Site‐Specific Mutation Reveals Bifunctional Mode of Action, Possessing Both Endolytic and Exolytic Degradation Activity Toward Alginate in Seaweed Biomass.” Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 420. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Costa, M. , Pio L., Bule P., et al. 2021. “An Individual Alginate Lyase Is Effective in the Disruption of Laminaria digitata Recalcitrant Cell Wall.” Scientific Reports 11: 9706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui, W. , Han L., Suo F., Liu Z., Zhou L., and Zhou Z.. 2018. “Exploitation of Bacillus Subtilis as a Robust Workhorse for Production of Heterologous Proteins and Beyond.” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 34: 145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui, Y. , Yang M., Liu N., et al. 2024. “Computer‐Aided Rational Design Strategy to Improve the Thermal Stability of Alginate Lyase AlyMc.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72: 3055–3065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Depping, P. , Román Lara M. M., Kesidis A., et al. 2022. “Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins in E. coli .” Methods in Molecular Biology 2507: 59–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong, S. , Wei T.‐D., Chen X.‐L., et al. 2014. “Molecular Insight Into the Role of the N‐Terminal Extension in the Maturation, Substrate Recognition, and Catalysis of a Bacterial Alginate Lyase From Polysaccharide Lyase Family 18.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 289: 29558–29569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du, Y.‐W. , Liu L., Feng N.‐J., et al. 2023. “Combined Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Alginate Oligosaccharides Alleviating Salt Stress in Rice Seedlings.” BMC Plant Biology 23: 455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El‐Mohdy, H. L. A. 2017. “Radiation‐Induced Degradation of Sodium Alginate and Its Plant Growth Promotion Effect.” Arabian Journal of Chemistry 10, no. S431 S438: S431–S438. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Enquist‐Newman, M. , Faust A. M. E., Bravo D. D., et al. 2014. “Efficient Ethanol Production From Brown Macroalgae Sugars by a Synthetic Yeast Platform.” Nature 505: 239–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falak, S. , Sajed M., and Rashid N.. 2022. “Strategies to Enhance Soluble Production of Heterologous Proteins in Escherichia Coli .” Biologia 77: 893–905. [Google Scholar]
- Falkeborg, M. , Cheong L.‐Z., Gianfico C., et al. 2014. “Alginate Oligosaccharides: Enzymatic Preparation and Antioxidant Property Evaluation.” Food Chemistry 164: 185–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng, W. , Liu J., Wang S., et al. 2021. “Alginate Oligosaccharide Alleviates D‐Galactose‐Induced Cardiac Ageing via Regulating Myocardial Mitochondria Function and Integrity in Mice.” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 25: 7157–7168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferdhous, P. B. , Aanandhalakshmi R., Ramya P., and Vanavil B.. 2022. “Scrutiny of Metal Ion Binding Sites in Different Alginate Lyases Through in Silico Analysis.” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 194, no. 1: 124–147. 10.1007/s12010-021-03746-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ficko‐Blean, E. , and Boraston A. B.. 2006. “The Interaction of a Carbohydrate‐Binding Module From a Clostridium Perfringens N‐Acetyl‐Beta‐Hexosaminidase With Its Carbohydrate Receptor.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 281: 37748–37757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao, S. , Zhang Z., Li S., et al. 2018. “Characterization of a New Endo‐Type Polysaccharide Lyase (PL) Family 6 Alginate Lyase With Cold‐Adapted and Metal Ions‐Resisted Property.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 120: 729–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garron, M.‐L. , and Cygler M.. 2010. “Structural and Mechanistic Classification of Uronic Acid‐Containing Polysaccharide Lyases.” Glycobiology 20: 1547–1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gimpel, J. A. , Ravanal M. C., Salazar O., and Lienqueo M. E.. 2018. “Saccharification of Brown Macroalgae Using an Arsenal of Recombinant Alginate Lyases: Potential Application in the Biorefinery Process.” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 28: 1671–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomaa, M. , Fawzy M. A., Hifney A. F., and Abdel‐Gawad K. M.. 2018. “Optimization of Enzymatic Saccharification of Fucoidan and Alginate From Brown Seaweed Using Fucoidanase and Alginate Lyase From the Marine Fungus Dendryphiella Arenaria .” Journal of Applied Phycology 31: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, X. , Fu L., Wang Z., et al. 2024. “A Novel Bifunctional Alginate Lyase and Antioxidant Activity of the Enzymatic Hydrolysates.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72: 4116–4126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gundewadi, G. , Rudra S. G., Sarkar D. J., and Singh D.. 2018. “Nanoemulsion Based Alginate Organic Coating for Shelf Life Extension of Okra.” Food Packaging and Shelf Life 18: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q. , Dan M., Zheng Y., Shen J., Zhao G., and Wang D.. 2023. “Improving the Thermostability of a Novel PL‐6 Family Alginate Lyase by Rational Design Engineering for Industrial Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 249: 125998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q. , Dan M., Zheng Y., Zhao G., and Wang D.. 2024. “Construction and Characterization of a Novel Fusion Alginate Lyase With Endolytic and Exolytic Cleavage Activity for Industrial Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides.” Food Chemistry 453: 139695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, S. , Lokesh J., Abdelhafiz Y., et al. 2019. “Macroalga‐Derived Alginate Oligosaccharide Alters Intestinal Bacteria of Atlantic Salmon.” Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han, J. , Sun Y., Zhang T., et al. 2023. “The Preservable Effects of Ultrasound‐Assisted Alginate Oligosaccharide Soaking on Cooked Crayfish Subjected to Freeze‐Thaw Cycles.” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 92: 106259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao, J. , Hao C., Zhang L., et al. 2015. “OM2, a Novel Oligomannuronate‐Chromium(III) Complex, Promotes Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Lipid Metabolism in 3T3‐L1 Adipocytes via the AMPK‐PGC1α Pathway.” PLoS One 10: e0131930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hengzhuang, W. , Song Z., Ciofu O., Onsøyen E., Rye P. D., and Høiby N.. 2016. “OligoG CF‐5/20 Disruption of Mucoid Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilm in a Murine Lung Infection Model.” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 60: 2620–2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hobbs, J. K. , Lee S. M., Robb M., et al. 2016. “KdgF, the Missing Link in the Microbial Metabolism of Uronate Sugars From Pectin and Alginate.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 6188–6193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, F. , Cao S., Li Q., Zhu B., and Yao Z.. 2021. “Construction and Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Hybrid Alginate Lyase With High Activity by Module Recombination to Prepare Alginate Oligosaccharides.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 166: 1272–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, F. , Li Q., Zhu B., Ni F., Sun Y., and Yao Z.. 2019. “Effects of Module Truncation on Biochemical Characteristics and Products Distribution of a New Alginate Lyase With Two Catalytic Modules.” Glycobiology 29: 876–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, J. , Zhang J., and Wu S.. 2021. “The Growth Performance and Non‐Specific Immunity of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella) Affected by Dietary Alginate Oligosaccharide.” 3 Biotech 11: 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang, G. , Wen S., Liao S., et al. 2019. “Characterization of a Bifunctional Alginate Lyase as a New Member of the Polysaccharide Lyase Family 17 From a Marine Strain BP‐2.” Biotechnology Letters 41: 1187–1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.‐P. , Yun S.‐T., Zhao J.‐X., et al. 2024. “The Two‐Step Strategy for Enhancing the Specific Activity and Thermostability of Alginate Lyase AlyG2 With Mechanism for Improved Thermostability.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 273, no. Pt 2: 132685. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, A. , Takadono K., Nishiyama R., Tajima K., Kobayashi T., and Ojima T.. 2014. “Characterization of an Alginate Lyase, FlAlyA, From Flavobacterium sp. Strain UMI‐01 and Its Expression in Escherichia Coli .” Marine Drugs 12: 4693–4712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwamoto, M. , Kurachi M., Nakashima T., et al. 2005. “Structure‐Activity Relationship of Alginate Oligosaccharides in the Induction of Cytokine Production From RAW264.7 Cells.” FEBS Letters 579: 4423–4429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J. , Hu Z., Wang Y., Jiang Z., Yan Q., and Yang S.. 2025. “Directed Evolution of an Alginate Lyase From Flammeovirga sp. for Seaweed Fertilizer Production From the Brown Seaweed Laminaria Japonica.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 73: 1468–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J. , Jiang Z., Yan Q., Han S., and Yang S.. 2023. “Releasing Bioactive Compounds From Brown Seaweed With Novel Cold‐Adapted Alginate Lyase and Alcalase.” Marine Drugs 21, no. 4: 208. 10.3390/md21040208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang, C. W. , Lim H. G., Won J., et al. 2022. “Circuit‐Guided Population Acclimation of a Synthetic Microbial Consortium for Improved Biochemical Production.” Nature Communications 13: 6506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai, S. , and Hashimoto W.. 2022. “4‐Deoxy‐l‐Erythro‐5‐Hexoseulose Uronate (DEH) and DEH Reductase: Key Molecule and Enzyme for the Metabolism and Utilization of Alginate.” Molecules 27: 338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai, S. , Ohashi K., Yoshida S., et al. 2014. “Bacterial Pyruvate Production From Alginate, a Promising Carbon Source From Marine Brown Macroalgae.” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 117: 269–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H. T. , Chung J. H., Wang D., et al. 2012. “Depolymerization of Alginate Into a Monomeric Sugar Acid Using Alg17C, an Exo‐Oligoalginate Lyase Cloned From Saccharophagus Degradans 2‐40.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 93: 2233–2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H. S. , Chu Y. J., Park C.‐H., Lee E. Y., and Kim H. S.. 2015. “Site‐Directed Mutagenesis‐Based Functional Analysis and Characterization of Endolytic Lyase Activity of N‐ and C‐Terminal Domains of a Novel Oligoalginate Lyase From Sphingomonas sp. MJ‐3 Possessing Exolytic Lyase Activity in the Intact Enzyme.” Marine Biotechnology 17: 782–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kittur, F. S. , Mangala S. L., Rus'd A. A., Kitaoka M., Tsujibo H., and Hayashi K.. 2003. “Fusion of Family 2b Carbohydrate‐Binding Module Increases the Catalytic Activity of a Xylanase From Thermotoga Maritima to Soluble Xylan.” FEBS Letters 549, no. 1‐3: 147–151. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00803-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H. K. , Woo S., Baek D., Min M., Jung G. Y., and Lim H. G.. 2024. “Direct and Robust Citramalate Production From Brown Macroalgae Using Fast‐Growing Vibrio sp. Dhg.” Bioresource Technology 394: 130304. 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.‐W. , Dong S., Song J., et al. 2011. “Purification and Characterization of a Bifunctional Alginate Lyase From Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM0524.” Marine Drugs 9, no. 1: 109–123. 10.3390/md9010109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, L. , Jiang J., Yao Z., and Zhu B.. 2023. “Recent Advances in the Production, Properties and Applications of Alginate Oligosaccharides – A Mini Review.” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 39: 207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q. , Hu F., Wang M., Zhu B., Ni F., and Yao Z.. 2020. “Elucidation of Degradation Pattern and Immobilization of a Novel Alginate Lyase for Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 146: 579–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. , He N., and Wang L.. 2019. “Efficiently Anti‐Obesity Effects of Unsaturated Alginate Oligosaccharides (UAOS) in High‐Fat Diet (HFD)‐fed Mice.” Marine Drugs 17, no. 9: 540. 10.3390/md17090540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. , Wang L., Liu B., and He N.. 2020. “Unsaturated Alginate Oligosaccharides Attenuated Obesity‐Related Metabolic Abnormalities by Modulating Gut Microbiota in High‐Fat‐Diet Mice.” Food & Function 11: 4773–4784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. , Wang Y., Li X., Lee B. S., Jung S., and Lee M.‐S.. 2019. “Enhancing the Thermo‐Stability and Anti‐Biofilm Activity of Alginate Lyase by Immobilization on Low Molecular Weight Chitosan Nanoparticles.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 18: 4565. 10.3390/ijms20184565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim, H. G. , Kwak D. H., Park S., et al. 2019. “ Vibrio sp. Dhg as a Platform for the Biorefinery of Brown Macroalgae.” Nature Communications 10, no. 1: 2486. 10.1038/s41467-019-10371-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. , Kennedy J. F., Zhang X., et al. 2020. “Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharide and Its Effects on Decay Control and Quality Maintenance of Harvested Kiwifruit.” Carbohydrate Polymers 242: 116462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. , Yang S., Li X., Yan Q., Reaney M. J. T., and Jiang Z.. 2019. “Alginate Oligosaccharides: Production, Biological Activities, and Potential Applications.” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 18: 1859–1881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu, D. , Zhang Q., Wang S., et al. 2019. “Biochemical Characteristics and Synergistic Effect of Two Novel Alginate Lyases From Photobacterium sp. FC615.” Biotechnology for Biofuels 12: 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma, L. , Zhang B., Deng S., and Xie C.. 2015. “Comparison of the Cryoprotective Effects of Trehalose, Alginate, and Its Oligosaccharides on Peeled Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) During Frozen Storage.” Journal of Food Science 80: C540–C546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Y. , Li J., Zhang X.‐Y., et al. 2020. “Characterization of a New Intracellular Alginate Lyase With Metal Ions‐Tolerant and pH‐Stable Properties.” Marine Drugs 18: 416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madzak, C. 2015. “Yarrowia Lipolytica: Recent Achievements in Heterologous Protein Expression and Pathway Engineering.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 99: 4559–4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madzak, C. , Gaillardin C., and Beckerich J.‐M.. 2004. “Heterologous Protein Expression and Secretion in the Non‐Conventional Yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica: A Review.” Journal of Biotechnology 109: 63–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maghraby, Y. R. , El‐Shabasy R. M., Ibrahim A. H., and Azzazy H. M. E.‐S.. 2023. “Enzyme Immobilization Technologies and Industrial Applications.” ACS Omega 8, no. 6: 5184–5196. 10.1021/acsomega.2c07560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mansfeld, J. , Vriend G., Dijkstra B. W., et al. 1997. “Extreme Stabilization of a Thermolysin‐Like Protease by an Engineered Disulfide Bond.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 11152–11156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meng, Q. , Tian X., Jiang B., Zhou L., Chen J., and Zhang T.. 2021. “Characterization and Enhanced Extracellular Overexpression of a New Salt‐Activated Alginate Lyase.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 101: 5154–5162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mlynek, G. , Djinović‐Carugo K., and Carugo O.. 2024. “B‐Factor Rescaling for Protein Crystal Structure Analyses.” Crystals 14: 443. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, J. H. , Woo S., Shin H. J., Lee H. K., Jung G. Y., and Lim H. G.. 2024. “Direct Itaconate Production From Brown Macroalgae Using Engineered Vibrio sp. Dhg.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72: 16860–16866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musil, M. , Stourac J., Bendl J., et al. 2017. “FireProt: Web Server for Automated Design of Thermostable Proteins.” Nucleic Acids Research 45: W393–W399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narad, P. , Gupta R., Gupta I., and Sengupta A.. 2023. “Protein Engineering Methods to Design Protein Therapeutics.” In Protein‐Based Therapeutics, edited by Singh D. B. and Tripathi T., 49–100. Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar]
- Narsico, J. , Inoue A., Oka S., and Ojima T.. 2020. “Production of a Novel Dimeric 4‐Deoxy‐L‐Erythro‐5‐Hexoseulose Uronic Acid by a PL‐17 Exolytic Alginate Lyase From Hydrogenophaga sp. UMI‐18.” Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications 525: 982–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, T. T. , Mikkelsen M. D., Tran V. H. N., et al. 2020. “Enzyme‐Assisted Fucoidan Extraction From Brown Macroalgae Fucus Distichus Subsp. Evanescens and Saccharina Latissima.” Marine Drugs 18, no. 6: 296. 10.3390/md18060296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owji, H. , Nezafat N., Negahdaripour M., Hajiebrahimi A., and Ghasemi Y.. 2018. “A Comprehensive Review of Signal Peptides: Structure, Roles, and Applications.” European Journal of Cell Biology 97: 422–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan, H. , Feng W., Chen M., et al. 2021. “Alginate Oligosaccharide Ameliorates D‐Galactose‐Induced Kidney Aging in Mice Through Activation of the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway.” BioMed Research International 2021: 6623328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park, H. H. , Kam N., Lee E. Y., and Kim H. S.. 2012. “Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Oligoalginate Lyase From a Newly Isolated Bacterium Sphingomonas sp. MJ‐3.” Marine Biotechnology 14: 189–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park, H. J. , Ahn J.‐M., Park R.‐M., et al. 2016. “Effects of Alginate Oligosaccharide Mixture on the Bioavailability of Lysozyme as an Antimicrobial Agent.” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 16: 1445–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell, L. C. , Adams J. Y. M., Quoraishi S., et al. 2023. “Alginate Oligosaccharides Enhance the Antifungal Activity of Nystatin Against Candidal Biofilms.” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 13: 1122340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard, M. F. , Jack A. A., Powell L. C., et al. 2017. “Alginate Oligosaccharides Modify Hyphal Infiltration of Candida Albicans in an In Vitro Model of Invasive Human Candidosis.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 123, no. 3: 625–636. 10.1111/jam.13516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard, M. F. , Powell L. C., Jack A. A., et al. 2017. “A Low‐Molecular‐Weight Alginate Oligosaccharide Disrupts Pseudomonal Microcolony Formation and Enhances Antibiotic Effectiveness.” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 61: 10‐1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, X.‐M. , Lin Q., Zheng B.‐D., Zhao W.‐L., Ye J., and Xiao M.‐T.. 2023. “Preparation and Potential Antitumor Activity of Alginate Oligosaccharides Degraded by Alginate Lyase From Cobetia Marina .” Carbohydrate Research 534: 108962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravanal, M. C. , Sharma S., Gimpel J., et al. 2017. “The Role of Alginate Lyases in the Enzymatic Saccharification of Brown Macroalgae, Macrocystis Pyrifera and Saccharina Latissima.” Algal Research 26: 287–293. [Google Scholar]
- Rhein‐Knudsen, N. , Guan C., Mathiesen G., and Horn S. J.. 2021. “Expression and Production of Thermophilic Alginate Lyases in Bacillus and Direct Application of Culture Supernatant for Seaweed Saccharification.” Algal Research 60: 102512. [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo, D. R. , and Biswal T.. 2021. “Alginate and Its Application to Tissue Engineering.” SN Applied Sciences 3: 30. [Google Scholar]
- Schiener, P. , Stanley M. S., Black K. D., and Green D. H.. 2016. “Assessment of Saccharification and Fermentation of Brown Seaweeds to Identify the Seasonal Effect on Bioethanol Production.” Journal of Applied Phycology 28: 3009–3020. [Google Scholar]
- Shu, L. I. , Wei Z., and Chunmei Z.. 2019. “Directed Evolution of Alginate Lyase Alg‐2 Based on Error Prone PCR.” Food Science 40: 146–151. [Google Scholar]
- Siloto, R. M. P. , and Weselake R. J.. 2012. “Site Saturation Mutagenesis: Methods and Applications in Protein Engineering.” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 1: 181–189. [Google Scholar]
- Su, B. , Wu D., Xu X., Xu L., Wang L., and Lin J.. 2021. “Design of a PL18 Alginate Lyase With Flexible Loops and Broader Entrance to Enhance the Activity and Thermostability.” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 151: 109916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, C. , Zhou J., Duan G., and Yu X.. 2020. “Hydrolyzing Laminaria Japonica With a Combination of Microbial Alginate Lyase and Cellulase.” Bioresource Technology 311: 123548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X. , Shen W., Gao Y., Cai M., Zhou M., and Zhang Y.. 2019. “Heterologous Expression and Purification of a Marine Alginate Lyase in Escherichia coli .” Protein Expression and Purification 153: 97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki, H. , Suzuki K., Inoue A., and Ojima T.. 2006. “A Novel Oligoalginate Lyase From Abalone, Haliotis Discus Hannai, That Releases Disaccharide From Alginate Polymer in an Exolytic Manner.” Carbohydrate Research 341: 1809–1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takagi, T. , Sasaki Y., Motone K., et al. 2017. “Construction of Bioengineered Yeast Platform for Direct Bioethanol Production From Alginate and Mannitol.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101: 6627–6636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takeda, H. , Yoneyama F., Kawai S., Hashimoto W., and Murata K.. 2011. “Bioethanol Production From Marine Biomass Alginate by Metabolically Engineered Bacteria.” Energy & Environmental Science 4: 2575. [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka, Y. , Murase Y., Shibata T., Tanaka R., Mori T., and Miyake H.. 2022. “Production of 4‐Deoxy‐L‐Erythro‐5‐Hexoseulose Uronic Acid Using Two Free and Immobilized Alginate Lyases From Falsirhodobacter sp. Alg1.” Molecules 27, no. 10: 3308. 10.3390/molecules27103308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Várnai, A. , Siika‐Aho M., and Viikari L.. 2013. “Carbohydrate‐Binding Modules (CBMs) Revisited: Reduced Amount of Water Counterbalances the Need for CBMs.” Biotechnology for Biofuels 6: 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasudevan, Mrudulakumari, U. , Lee O. K., and Lee E. Y.. 2021. “Alginate Derived Functional Oligosaccharides: Recent Developments, Barriers, and Future Outlooks.” Carbohydrate Polymers 267: 118158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D. , Yun E. J., Kim S., et al. 2016. “Efficacy of Acidic Pretreatment for the Saccharification and Fermentation of Alginate From Brown Macroalgae.” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 39: 959–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.‐H. , Zhang Y.‐Q., Zhang X.‐R., et al. 2024. “High‐Level Extracellular Production of a Trisaccharide‐Producing Alginate Lyase AlyC7 in Escherichia Coli and Its Agricultural Application.” Marine Drugs 22: 230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y. , Li L., Ye C., Yuan J., and Qin S.. 2020. “Alginate Oligosaccharide Improves Lipid Metabolism and Inflammation by Modulating Gut Microbiota in High‐Fat Diet Fed Mice.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104: 3541–3554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wargacki, A. J. , Leonard E., Win M. N., et al. 2012. “An Engineered Microbial Platform for Direct Biofuel Production From Brown Macroalgae.” Science 335: 308–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe, K. , Masuda T., Ohashi H., Mihara H., and Suzuki Y.. 1994. “Multiple Proline Substitutions Cumulatively Thermostabilize Bacillus Cereus ATCC7064 Oligo‐1,6‐Glucosidase. Irrefragable Proof Supporting the Proline Rule.” European Journal of Biochemistry 226: 277–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong, T. Y. , Preston L. A., and Schiller N. L.. 2000. “ALGINATE LYASE: Review of Major Sources and Enzyme Characteristics, Structure‐Function Analysis, Biological Roles, and Applications.” Annual Review of Microbiology 54: 289–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X. , Bi D.‐C., Li C., et al. 2015. “Morphological and Proteomic Analyses Reveal That Unsaturated Guluronate Oligosaccharide Modulates Multiple Functional Pathways in Murine Macrophage RAW264.7 Cells.” Marine Drugs 13: 1798–1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X. , Wu X., Wang Q., et al. 2014. “Immunomodulatory Effects of Alginate Oligosaccharides on Murine Macrophage RAW264.7 Cells and Their Structure‐Activity Relationships.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62: 3168–3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X. , Zeng D., Wu D., and Lin J.. 2021. “Single‐Point Mutation Near Active Center Increases Substrate Affinity of Alginate Lyase AlgL‐CD.” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 193: 1513–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yagi, H. , Fujise A., Itabashi N., and Ohshiro T.. 2016. “Purification and Characterization of a Novel Alginate Lyase From the Marine Bacterium Cobetia sp. NAP1 Isolated From Brown Algae.” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 80: 2338–2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto, S. , Sahara T., Sato D., et al. 2008. “Catalytically Important Amino‐Acid Residues of Abalone Alginate Lyase HdAly Assessed by Site‐Directed Mutagenesis.” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 43: 396–402. [Google Scholar]
- Yamasaki, Y. , Taga S., Kishioka M., and Kawano S.. 2016. “A Metabolic Profile in Ruditapes Philippinarum Associated With Growth‐Promoting Effects of Alginate Hydrolysates.” Scientific Reports 6: 29923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan, G. L. , Guo Y. M., Yuan J. M., Liu D., and Zhang B. K.. 2011. “Sodium Alginate Oligosaccharides From Brown Algae Inhibit Salmonella Enteritidis Colonization in Broiler Chickens.” Poultry Science 90: 1441–1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J. , Chen P., Zeng Y., et al. 2019. “The Characterization and Modification of a Novel Bifunctional and Robust Alginate Lyase Derived From Marinimicrobium sp. H1.” Marine Drugs 17, no. 10: 545. 10.3390/md17100545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang, M. , Li N., Yang S., et al. 2019. “Study on Expression and Action Mode of Recombinant Alginate Lyases Based on Conserved Domains Reconstruction.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 103: 807–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang, M. , Yang S.‐X., Liu Z.‐M., Li N.‐N., Li L., and Mou H.‐J.. 2019. “Rational Design of Alginate Lyase From Microbulbifer sp. Q7 to Improve Thermal Stability.” Marine Drugs 17, no. 6: 378. 10.3390/md17060378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yun, S. , Huang J., Zhang M., Wang X., Wang X., and Zhou Y.. 2024. “Preliminary Identification and Semi‐Quantitative Characterization of a Multi‐Faceted High‐Stability Alginate Lyase From Marine Microbe Seonamhaeicola Algicola With Anti‐Biofilm Effect on Pseudomonas Aeruginosa .” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 175: 110408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B. , Yao H., Qi H., and Zhang X.‐L.. 2020. “Trehalose and Alginate Oligosaccharides Increase the Stability of Muscle Proteins in Frozen Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei).” Food & Function 11: 1270–1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C. , Li M., Rauf A., et al. 2023. “Process and Applications of Alginate Oligosaccharides With Emphasis on Health Beneficial Perspectives.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 63: 303–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C. , Wang W., Zhao X., Wang H., and Yin H.. 2020. “Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides and Their Biological Activities in Plants: A Review.” Carbohydrate Research 494: 108056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L. , Li X., Zhang X., Li Y., and Wang L.. 2021. “Bacterial Alginate Metabolism: An Important Pathway for Bioconversion of Brown Algae.” Biotechnology for Biofuels 14: 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X. , Li W., Pan L., et al. 2022. “Improving the Thermostability of Alginate Lyase FlAlyA With High Expression by Computer‐Aided Rational Design for Industrial Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides.” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10: 1011273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X. , Tang Y., Gao F., et al. 2024. “Low‐Cost and Efficient Strategy for Brown Algal Hydrolysis: Combination of Alginate Lyase and Cellulase.” Bioresource Technology 397: 130481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z. , Kuipers G., Niemiec Ł., et al. 2015. “High‐Level Production of Membrane Proteins in E. Coli BL21(DE3) by Omitting the Inducer IPTG.” Microbial Cell Factories 14: 142. 10.1186/s12934-015-0328-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z. , Tang L., Bao M., Liu Z., Yu W., and Han F.. 2019. “Functional Characterization of Carbohydrate‐Binding Modules in a New Alginate Lyase, TsAly7B, From Thalassomonas sp. LD5.” Marine Drugs 18, no. 1: 25. 10.3390/md18010025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, K. , Zhu Y., An Z., Lin J., Shan S., and Zhang H.. 2023. “Cloning, Expression and Characterization of an Alginate Lyase in Bacillus Subtilis WB600.” Fermentation 9: 144. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y. , Li Y., Yang Y., et al. 2022. “Recent Advances in Bioutilization of Marine Macroalgae Carbohydrates: Degradation, Metabolism, and Fermentation.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 70: 1438–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, B. , Li K., Wang W., et al. 2019. “Preparation of Trisaccharides From Alginate by a Novel Alginate Lyase Alg7A From Marine Bacterium Vibrio sp. W13.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 139: 879–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, B. , Li L., and Yuan X.. 2024. “Efficient Preparation of Alginate Oligosaccharides by Using Alginate Lyases and Evaluation of the Development Promoting Effects on Brassica Napus L. in Saline‐Alkali Environment.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 270: 131917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, B. , Tan H., Qin Y., Xu Q., Du Y., and Yin H.. 2015. “Characterization of a New Endo‐Type Alginate Lyase From Vibrio sp. W13.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 75: 330–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y. , Wu L., Chen Y., Ni H., Xiao A., and Cai H.. 2016. “Characterization of an Extracellular Biofunctional Alginate Lyase From Marine Microbulbifer sp. ALW1 and Antioxidant Activity of Enzymatic Hydrolysates.” Microbiology Research 182: 49–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
