Abstract
Background
Adenovirus infection causes considerable morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients, primarily those affected by severe respiratory system involvement. Although prevalent, it often presents vague indications, making accurate diagnosis and management challenging. This study aims to set some risk factors for invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO, and mortality in children with severe adenovirus infection admitted to PICU.
Methods
We evaluated 66 children with severe adenovirus infection admitted to the PICU of Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from 2018 to 2019. Data on general conditions, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, pathogenetic and radiological discoveries, treatments, therapeutic efficacy, and outcomes were collected. Machine learning models were used to predict the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO, and mortality.
Results
Of the 66 patients, 5 died, and 61 survived. Significant factors related to mortality included heart failure (p = 0.005), pericardial effusion (p = 0.032), septic shock (p = 0.009), hemoglobin levels (p = 0.013), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.022), albumin (p = 0.035), normal creatinine levels (p = 0.037), and pneumothorax (p = 0.002). Additional risk factors for invasive mechanical ventilation included acute respiratory distress syndrome and encephalopathy. Low breath sounds were identified as a risk factor for ECMO. For predicting poor outcomes, including invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO, or mortality, the random forest model using these factors demonstrated high accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.968.
Conclusions
The study indicates poor prognosis in children with severe adenovirus infection is significantly related to comorbidities and clinical symptoms. Machine learning models can accurately predict adverse outcomes, providing valuable insights for management and treatment. Identifying high-risk patients using these models can improve clinical outcomes by guiding timely and appropriate interventions.
Trial registration
The article is a retrospective study without a clinical trial number, so it is not applicable.
Keywords: Risk factors, Invasive mechanical ventilation, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), Mortality, Severe adenovirus infection
Introduction
Human adenoviruses comprise a group of non-enveloped viruses with double-stranded linear DNA [1]. Adenovirus infection is at high risk in pediatrics, accounting for 2–7% of respiratory diseases and 4–20% of pneumonia [2–4]. While most infections are self-limiting or present with minor respiratory symptoms, in some cases, such as immunocompromised children, adenoviruses can manifest as a severe, life-threatening disease requiring intensive care and characterized by a high mortality rate [5, 6]. The incidence of respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is higher among infants and children admitted to the PICU with adenovirus respiratory infections [7, 8]. The reported mortality rate for pediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infections due to adenoviruses requiring PICU admission ranges from 7 to 22%. The incidence of adenovirus infection is significantly higher in children with compromised immune functions, and the mortality rate can reach 50% [9].
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is commonly used in managing critically ill children suffering severe adenovirus infections. MV is not a direct cause of complications. Still, rather, it is an intervention that is indispensable in patients with severe respiratory failure, in some cases associated with multiple organ failure [10, 11]. Although MV may consequently lead to a range of secondary complications, for example, ventilator-associated pneumonia, these complications arise because of the severe illness of the patient and not quite due to the MV [12]. Mechanical ventilation is an absolute requisite for these patients because of an ongoing respiratory crisis appearing to be independently determinative of mortality in severe adenovirus pneumonia [13]. Mechanical ventilation is a therapeutic measure that provides supportive respiratory function in critically ill patients rather than causing other infections that complicate the clinical picture.
This study aims to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with severe adenovirus respiratory infection pneumonia in our hospital and to analyze the risk factors for MV, ECMO, and mortality. The study will provide research evidence for the clinical identification of high-risk populations with poor prognosis.
Methods
Setting
This retrospective study reviewed 66 children admitted to the PICU of Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health diagnosed with severe adenovirus pneumonia between January 2018 and December 2019. The diagnosis was made based on positive adenovirus tests on respiratory specimens, and the hospital’s medical record management system created the list of patients. All the children were subjected to chest X-ray or computed tomography scan to evaluate the severity of pneumonia; during the acute stage of the infection, respiratory secretions compellingly mentioned the application of indirect immunofluorescence virus detection for identifying the type causing the infection. Blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures were performed on patients with suspected bacterial, mycoplasma, or fungal infections. Symptomatic adenovirus-infected children were diagnosed clinically to be either moderate or severe pneumonia. Study participants with incomplete data were excluded. The study was approved by the Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health (Approval No.2024-IRB-0222-P-01), and concurrence from parents or guardians was obtained in accordance with hospital policy; ethical committee waiver consent was given for this retrospective study.
Cohort description
The cohort consisted of young patients ranging from neonates to adolescents. A majority of the patients were in good health before the study, although some suffered from underlying comorbidities such as immunodeficiency disorders. The cohort encompassed healthy children with no significant pre-existing chronic conditions alongside children with immunocompromised conditions arising due to prior medical treatment or congenital disease.
Data collection
Information was recorded for each patient about general condition, clinical presentation, laboratory findings, etiologic and radiological results, treatment provided, and outcome on the first day of admission to the PICU, arterial PCO2, PaO2, and hypoxemia measured as P/F were recorded. The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria were adopted to define ARDS [14]. Septic shock was defined according to the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference criteria [15]. Preceding clinical history revealed symptoms of heart failure in combination with echocardiographic findings that included identification of systolic dysfunction, decreased ejection fraction, and the presence of pulmonary edema or pleural effusion. Encephalopathy (neurological complications including seizures, encephalitis, encephalopathy, Reye’s syndrome, and all other infection-related neurological diseases) was defined according to the standards espoused by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [16].
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Eligibility criteria were children under 18 years of age who tested positive for adenovirus and were clinically diagnosed with moderate to severe pneumonia. Exclusion criteria were children with incomplete clinical information or other non-adenoviral respiratory infections.
Follow-up of clinical parameters
Clinical parameters such as PCO₂, FiO₂, CRP, Hb, and LDH were recorded primarily on the first day of PICU admission to assess the severity of the illness. These parameters were not monitored systematically during hospitalization since the primary objective was identifying early predictors of poor outcomes. However, those parameters were monitored clinically as per standard of care protocols.
Data analyses
SPSS version 24.0 and R version 4.1.1 were used for all the statistical calculations. The children were divided into two groups according to their survival status and whether MV/ECMO was required. Parameter data were presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartiles. They were compared with t-tests or the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, respectively, if normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk normality test). Categorical variables were presented as the number and percentage of occurrences within each category, and comparisons between groups were made using a chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
Machine learning model fitting took place with MV/ECMO or death being designated as poor outcomes. Feature variables were selected with a cutoff contribution score to the area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 0.2. A 5-fold cross-validation of the prediction performance of random forest models, logistic regression models, decision tree models, and weighted K-nearest neighbor models concerning poor outcomes was done. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and AUC determined the fitted accuracy. A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Results
Demographic information and patient outcomes
Features for clinical data were collected from 66 children. Five died, while 61 were alive. The cohort comprised males and females with a median age of 23 months (2 months to 15 years). Primary outcomes in this study were obtention of mechanical ventilation, ECMO, and mortality.
Factors associated with patient outcomes
The most significant clinical/demographic variables associated with specific outcomes were heart failure (p = 0.005), the presence of pericardial effusion (p = 0.032), the onset of septic shock (p = 0.009), the levels of HB (p = 0.013), levels of lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.022), levels of albumin (p = 0.035), and normal creatinine (p = 0.037). Also, during treatment, length of hospital stay (p = 0.008), number of antibiotics used (p = 0.002), use of antifungal medication (0.011), MV (p = 0.006), and ECMO (p = 0.016) showed a significant correlation with patient outcomes (Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparative results of different death outcomes in children with severe adenovirus infection admitted to PICU
Variable | Survival group | Death group | Statistic | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR)/n | Median (IQR)/n | ||||
N | 61 | 5 | |||
Hospitalization duration | 17(11) | 45 (32) | 7.056 | 0.008 | |
Sex | Boy | 35 | 3 | ||
Girl | 26 | 2 | 0.013 | 1.000 | |
Age (Month) | 23 (31) | 17 (24) | 0.494 | 0.482 | |
Fever higher than 39℃ | Yes | 55 | 5 | ||
No | 6 | 0 | 0.541 | 1.000 | |
Fever days | 13 (12) | 17 (11) | -0.252 | 0.811 | |
Fever more than 5 days | Yes | 54 | 5 | ||
No | 7 | 0 | 0.642 | 0.649 | |
Fever more than 15 days | Yes | 25 | 3 | ||
No | 36 | 2 | 0.684 | 0.667 | |
Cough more than 15 days | Yes | 57 | 5 | ||
No | 4 | 0 | 0.349 | 1.000 | |
Vomiting/diarrhea | Yes | 7 | 0 | ||
No | 54 | 5 | 0.642 | 0.641 | |
Cyanosis | Yes | 5 | 0 | ||
No | 56 | 5 | 0.443 | 1.000 | |
Convulsions | Yes | 3 | 1 | ||
No | 58 | 4 | 1.846 | 0.248 | |
Breath count more than 60 time/minutes | Yes | 29 | 4 | ||
No | 32 | 1 | 1.948 | 0.343 | |
Heart rate more than 180 times/minutes | Yes | 26 | 3 | ||
No | 35 | 2 | 0.566 | 0.655 | |
Moist rales | Yes | 60 | 5 | ||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.083 | 1.000 | |
Wheeze | Yes | 54 | 4 | ||
No | 7 | 1 | 0.315 | 1.000 | |
Low breath sounds | Yes | 16 | 3 | ||
No | 45 | 2 | 2.571 | 0.145 | |
Respiratory failure | Yes | 60 | 5 | ||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.083 | 1.000 | |
ARDS | Yes | 8 | 2 | ||
No | 53 | 3 | 2.598 | 0.173 | |
Heart failure | Yes | 8 | 4 | ||
No | 53 | 1 | 13.897 | 0.005 | |
Pericardial effusion | Yes | 18 | 4 | ||
No | 43 | 1 | 5.302 | 0.032 | |
Gastrointestinal bleeding | Yes | 0 | 1 | ||
No | 61 | 4 | 12.388 | 0.071 | |
Encephalopathy | Yes | 11 | 3 | ||
No | 50 | 2 | 4.870 | 0.061 | |
Septic shock | Yes | 12 | 4 | ||
No | 49 | 1 | 9.158 | 0.009 | |
Acute renal failure | Yes | 2 | 1 | ||
No | 59 | 4 | 2.978 | 0.212 | |
PCO2 | 40.9 (19.6) | 54.7 (29.7) | 3.712 | 0.054 | |
WBC | 7.28 (10.34) | 26.44 (27.5) | 0.324 | 0.569 | |
CRP | 14.4 (37.48) | 56 (43.03) | 1.626 | 0.202 | |
HB* | 102.23 ± 18.17 | 81.2 ± 11.99 | 3.599 | 0.013 | |
PLT | 254 (193) | 59 (177) | 2.676 | 0.102 | |
Normal ALT/AST ratio | Yes | 35 | 1 | ||
No | 26 | 4 | 2.604 | 0.160 | |
LDH | 670 (632.5) | 1596 (658) | 5.242 | 0.022 | |
Normal CK-MB | Yes | 15 | 2 | ||
No | 46 | 3 | 0.574 | 0.595 | |
Albumin | 31 (6.9) | 26.1 (2.2) | 4.448 | 0.035 | |
Normal creatinine | Yes | 58 | 3 | ||
No | 3 | 2 | 8.123 | 0.037 | |
Pneumonia grade | Medium | 13 | 0 | ||
Sever | 48 | 5 | 1.327 | 0.594 | |
Pleural effusion | Yes | 32 | 5 | ||
No | 29 | 0 | 4.240 | 0.060 | |
Pneumothorax | Yes | 8 | 4 | ||
No | 53 | 1 | 13.897 | 0.002 | |
Bronchoscopy | Yes | 27 | 4 | ||
No | 34 | 1 | 2.370 | 0.184 | |
Plastic bronchitis | Yes | 4 | 0 | ||
No | 57 | 5 | 0.349 | 1.000 | |
Concurrent infection | |||||
Bacterial | Yes | 33 | 5 | ||
No | 28 | 0 | 3.986 | 0.070 | |
Virus | Yes | 18 | 2 | ||
No | 43 | 3 | 0.241 | 1.000 | |
Fungi | Yes | 3 | 0 | ||
No | 58 | 5 | 0.258 | 1.000 | |
Antimicrobial drugs | |||||
Anti-virus | Yes | 22 | 3 | ||
No | 39 | 2 | 1.125 | 0.366 | |
Antibiotic type | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
2 | 23 | 0 | |||
3 | 16 | 0 | |||
4 | 12 | 1 | |||
5 | 2 | 1 | |||
6 | 1 | 2 | |||
7 | 2 | 1 | 24.253 | 0.002 | |
Anti-fungi | Yes | 12 | 4 | ||
No | 49 | 1 | 9.158 | 0.011 | |
Duration of steroid use (day) | 11 (7) | 15 (9) | 1.417 | 0.234 | |
γ globulin | Yes | 58 | 5 | ||
No | 3 | 0 | 0.258 | 1.000 | |
MV | Yes | 11 | 4 | ||
No | 50 | 1 | 10.104 | 0.006 | |
ECMO | Yes | 6 | 3 | ||
No | 55 | 2 | 9.874 | 0.016 |
Abbreviations: ALT: alanine transaminase; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; CRP: C-reaction protein; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HB: hemoglobin; IQR: interquartile range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MV: Mechanical ventilation; PCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PICU: pediatric intensive care unit; PLT: platelet; WBC: white blood cell
*: Mean (standard deviation)
Note: Bold fonts represent statistically significant differences.
Mechanical ventilation (MV) outcomes
A total of 15 patients needed MV. Notably associated with MV in the present study were diminished breath sounds (p = 0.001), ARDS (p < 0.001), heart failure (p < 0.001), pericardial effusion (p = 0.004), encephalopathy (p < 0.001), septic shock (p = 0.006), PCO₂ levels (p = 0.01), LDH levels (p = 0.031), albumin levels (p = 0.009), pleural effusion (p = 0.043), and pneumothorax (p < 0.001). During the treatment period, disease severity was significantly correlated with duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), number of antibiotic choices (p = 0.001), antifungal application (p = 0.001), and duration of steroid use (p = 0.004; Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparative results of whether implemented invasive MV in children with severe adenovirus infection admitted to PICU
Variable | No-MV application | MV application | Statistic | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||
N | 51 | 15 | |||
Hospitalization duration | 15 (7.5) | 45 (25.5) | 29.817 | < 0.001 | |
Sex | Boy | 31 | 7 | ||
Girl | 20 | 8 | 0.946 | 0.385 | |
Age (Month) | 24 (30) | 19 (28.5) | 0.312 | 0.576 | |
Fever higher than 39℃ | Yes | 48 | 12 | ||
No | 3 | 3 | 2.795 | 0.130 | |
Fever days | 12 (11.5) | 17 (10.5) | -1.197 | 0.246 | |
Fever more than 5 days | Yes | 45 | 14 | ||
No | 6 | 1 | 0.318 | 0.687 | |
Fever more than 15 days | Yes | 19 | 9 | ||
No | 32 | 6 | 2.455 | 0.155 | |
Cough more than 15 days | Yes | 49 | 13 | ||
No | 2 | 2 | 1.803 | 0.227 | |
Vomiting/diarrhea | Yes | 4 | 3 | ||
No | 47 | 12 | 1.807 | 0.328 | |
Cyanosis | Yes | 3 | 2 | ||
No | 48 | 13 | 0.919 | 0.582 | |
Convulsions | Yes | 3 | 1 | ||
No | 48 | 14 | 0.013 | 1.000 | |
Breath count more than 60 time/minutes | Yes | 22 | 11 | ||
No | 29 | 4 | 4.227 | 0.072 | |
Heart rate more than 180 times/minutes | Yes | 20 | 9 | ||
No | 31 | 6 | 2.033 | 0.239 | |
Moist rales | Yes | 50 | 15 | ||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.299 | 1.000 | |
Wheeze | Yes | 46 | 12 | ||
No | 5 | 3 | 1.131 | 0.348 | |
Low breath sounds | Yes | 8 | 11 | ||
No | 43 | 4 | 18.789 | 0.001 | |
Respiratory failure | Yes | 50 | 15 | ||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.299 | 1.000 | |
ARDS | Yes | 0 | 10 | ||
No | 51 | 5 | 40.071 | 0.001 | |
Heart failure | Yes | 2 | 10 | ||
No | 49 | 5 | 30.675 | 0.001 | |
Pericardial effusion | Yes | 12 | 10 | ||
No | 39 | 5 | 9.706 | 0.004 | |
Gastrointestinal bleeding | Yes | 0 | 1 | ||
No | 51 | 14 | 3.452 | 0.209 | |
Encephalopathy | Yes | 5 | 9 | ||
No | 46 | 6 | 17.475 | 0.001 | |
Septic shock | Yes | 8 | 8 | ||
No | 43 | 7 | 8.945 | 0.006 | |
Acute renal failure | Yes | 2 | 1 | ||
No | 49 | 14 | 0.201 | 1.000 | |
PCO 2 | 39.6 (16.25) | 54.7 (20.5) | 6.610 | 0.010 | |
WBC | 7.28 (11.13) | 9.69 (14.29) | 0.064 | 0.801 | |
CRP | 14 (30.55) | 42.87 (57.53) | 1.450 | 0.229 | |
HB* | 99.26 ± 17.71 | 105.33 ± 21.25 | -1.010 | 0.325 | |
PLT | 227 (190.5) | 254 (265) | 0.247 | 0.619 | |
Normal ALT/AST ratio | Yes | 30 | 6 | ||
No | 21 | 9 | 1.656 | 0.248 | |
LDH | 613 (601) | 1101 (1095) | 4.648 | 0.031 | |
Normal CK-MB | Yes | 13 | 4 | ||
No | 38 | 11 | 0.008 | 1.000 | |
Albumin | 31 (7.15) | 26.7 (6.9) | 6.731 | 0.009 | |
Normal creatinine | Yes | 49 | 12 | ||
No | 2 | 3 | 4.279 | 0.069 | |
Pneumonia grade | Medium | 12 | 1 | ||
Severe | 39 | 14 | 2.084 | 0.266 | |
Pleural effusion | Yes | 25 | 12 | ||
No | 26 | 3 | 4.516 | 0.043 | |
Pneumothorax | Yes | 3 | 9 | ||
No | 48 | 6 | 22.820 | 0.001 | |
Bronchoscopy | Yes | 23 | 8 | ||
No | 28 | 7 | 0.316 | 0.764 | |
Plastic bronchitis | Yes | 3 | 1 | ||
No | 48 | 14 | 0.013 | 1.000 | |
Concurrent infection | |||||
Bacterial | Yes | 27 | 11 | ||
No | 24 | 4 | 1.973 | 0.245 | |
Virus | Yes | 15 | 5 | ||
No | 36 | 10 | 0.084 | 1.000 | |
Fungi | Yes | 2 | 1 | ||
No | 49 | 14 | 0.201 | 1.000 | |
Antimicrobial drugs | |||||
Anti-virus | Yes | 16 | 9 | ||
No | 35 | 6 | 4.037 | 0.063 | |
Antibiotic type | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
2 | 22 | 1 | |||
3 | 13 | 3 | |||
4 | 9 | 4 | |||
5 | 1 | 2 | |||
6 | 1 | 2 | |||
7 | 0 | 3 | 23.314 | 0.001 | |
Anti-fungi | Yes | 7 | 9 | ||
No | 44 | 6 | 13.514 | 0.001 | |
Duration of steroid use (day) | 10 (7) | 15 (13) | 8.358 | 0.004 | |
γ globulin | Yes | 48 | 15 | ||
No | 3 | 0 | 0.924 | 0.576 |
Abbreviations: ALT: alanine transaminase; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; CRP: C-reaction protein; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HB: hemoglobin; IQR: interquartile range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MV: Mechanical ventilation; PCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PICU: pediatric intensive care unit; PLT: platelet; WBC: white blood cell
*: Mean (standard deviation)
Note: Bold fonts represent statistically significant differences.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes
ECMO was started in nine children. In addition to displaying markedly diminished breath sounds (p = 0.003), ARDS (p < 0.001), heart failure (p < 0.001), pericardial effusion (p < 0.001), encephalopathy (p = 0.001), and septic shock (p = 0.001), factors significantly associated with ECMO therapy also included creating barriers to leukocyte function as C-reactive protein (CRP)(p = 0.011), its partner lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)(p = 0.002), albumin, with the computer signal representation of albumin level showing an effective measure (p < 0.001), normal creatinine (p = 0.018), pleural effusion (p = 0.010), and pneumothorax (p = 0.048). During the treatment, the quantity of significant correlation will show how the patients developed the length of stay (p < 0.001), number of applied antibiotics (p = 0.001), finally applied antifungal (p = 0.004), length of steroid treatment (p = 0.002), and undergone mechanical ventilation (MV) (p < 0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Comparative results of whether implemented invasive ECMO in children with severe adenovirus infection admitted to PICU
Variable | No-ECMO application | ECMO application | Statistic | p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||||
N | 57 | 9 | ||||
Hospitalization duration | 17 (8) | 45 (22) | 17.242 | < 0.001 | ||
Sex | Boy | 34 | 4 | |||
Girl | 23 | 5 | 0.736 | 0.466 | ||
Age (Month) | 22 (30) | 31 (31) | 0.518 | 0.472 | ||
Fever higher than 39℃ | Yes | 51 | 9 | |||
No | 6 | 0 | 1.042 | 0.615 | ||
Fever days | 12 (12) | 18 (4) | 3.824 | 0.051 | ||
Fever more than 5 days | Yes | 50 | 9 | |||
No | 7 | 0 | 1.236 | 0.579 | ||
Fever more than 15 days | Yes | 21 | 7 | |||
No | 36 | 2 | 5.332 | 0.034 | ||
Cough more than 15 days | Yes | 53 | 9 | |||
No | 4 | 0 | 0.672 | 0.649 | ||
Vomiting/diarrhea | Yes | 5 | 2 | |||
No | 52 | 7 | 1.483 | 0.241 | ||
Cyanosis | Yes | 4 | 1 | |||
No | 53 | 8 | 0.186 | 1.000 | ||
Convulsions | Yes | 3 | 1 | |||
No | 54 | 8 | 0.467 | 1.000 | ||
Breath count more than 60 time/minutes | Yes | 26 | 7 | |||
No | 31 | 2 | 3.216 | 0.136 | ||
Heart rate more than 180 times/minutes | Yes | 23 | 6 | |||
No | 34 | 3 | 2.185 | 0.153 | ||
Moist rales | Yes | 56 | 9 | |||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||
Wheeze | Yes | 51 | 7 | |||
No | 6 | 2 | 0.998 | 0.591 | ||
Low breath sounds | Yes | 12 | 7 | |||
No | 45 | 2 | 12.200 | 0.003 | ||
Respiratory failure | Yes | 56 | 9 | |||
No | 1 | 0 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||
ARDS | Yes | 2 | 8 | |||
No | 55 | 1 | 44.074 | 0.001 | ||
Heart failure | Yes | 3 | 9 | |||
No | 54 | 0 | 46.895 | 0.001 | ||
Pericardial effusion | Yes | 14 | 8 | |||
No | 43 | 1 | 14.474 | 0.001 | ||
Gastrointestinal bleeding | Yes | 0 | 1 | |||
No | 57 | 8 | 6.431 | 0.131 | ||
Encephalopathy | Yes | 8 | 6 | |||
No | 49 | 3 | 12.883 | 0.001 | ||
Septic shock | Yes | 9 | 7 | |||
No | 48 | 2 | 16.263 | 0.001 | ||
Acute renal failure | Yes | 2 | 1 | |||
No | 55 | 8 | 1.035 | 0.353 | ||
PCO2 | 40.9 (19.6) | 50.9 (22.5) | 1.257 | 0.262 | ||
WBC | 7.88 (10.87) | 3.51 (18.38) | 2.151 | 0.142 | ||
CRP | 13.8 (31.33) | 56 (48.82) | 6.440 | 0.011 | ||
HB* | 98 ± 29 | 95 ± 17 | 0.490 | 0.633 | ||
PLT | 254 (196) | 90 (186) | 3.597 | 0.058 | ||
Normal ALT/AST ratio | Yes | 34 | 2 | |||
No | 23 | 7 | 4.391 | 0.072 | ||
LDH | 613 (628) | 1596 (1355) | 9.552 | 0.002 | ||
Normal CK-MB | Yes | 15 | 2 | |||
No | 42 | 7 | 0.068 | 1.000 | ||
Albumin | 31 (6.7) | 24.5 (2.6) | 12.283 | < 0.001 | ||
Normal creatinine | Yes | 55 | 6 | |||
No | 2 | 3 | 9.874 | 0.018 | ||
Pneumonia grade | Medium | 13 | 0 | |||
Severe | 44 | 9 | 2.556 | 0.194 | ||
Pleural effusion | Yes | 28 | 9 | |||
No | 29 | 0 | 8.168 | 0.010 | ||
Pneumothorax | Yes | 8 | 4 | |||
No | 49 | 5 | 4.832 | 0.048 | ||
Bronchoscopy | Yes | 24 | 7 | |||
No | 33 | 2 | 3.971 | 0.071 | ||
Plastic bronchitis | Yes | 3 | 1 | |||
No | 54 | 8 | 0.467 | 1.000 | ||
Concurrent infection | ||||||
Bacterial | Yes | 32 | 6 | |||
No | 25 | 3 | 0.353 | 0.705 | ||
Virus | Yes | 18 | 2 | |||
No | 39 | 7 | 0.322 | 0.712 | ||
Fungi | Yes | 3 | 0 | |||
No | 54 | 9 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||
Antimicrobial drugs | ||||||
Anti-virus | Yes | 19 | 6 | |||
No | 38 | 3 | 3.670 | 0.072 | ||
Antibiotic type | 1 | 5 | 0 | |||
2 | 23 | 0 | ||||
3 | 15 | 1 | ||||
4 | 10 | 3 | ||||
5 | 2 | 1 | ||||
6 | 2 | 1 | ||||
7 | 0 | 3 | 27.123 | 0.001 | ||
Anti-fungi | Yes | 10 | 6 | |||
No | 47 | 3 | 10.213 | 0.004 | ||
Duration of steroid use (day) | 10 (8) | 21 (15) | 9.783 | 0.002 | ||
γ globulin | Yes | 54 | 9 | |||
No | 3 | 0 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||
MV | Yes | 6 | 9 | |||
No | 51 | 0 | 35.432 | 0.001 |
Abbreviations: ALT: alanine transaminase; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; CRP: C-reaction protein; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HB: hemoglobin; IQR: interquartile range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MV: Mechanical ventilation; PCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PICU: pediatric intensive care unit; PLT: platelet; WBC: white blood cell
*: Mean (standard deviation)
Note: Bold fonts represent statistically significant differences.
Clarification of MV and ECMO as therapeutic interventions
This study describes MV and ECMO as treatment interventions rather than poor outcomes. Poor outcomes were defined as MV, ECMO, or death.
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Poor outcomes
Machine Learning Models for Outcome Prediction were employed to predict the poor outcome. The feature selection was based on AUC, concluding with the following eight features: heart failure, ARDS, encephalopathy, diminished breath sounds, pneumothorax, and septic shock. Random forest (AUC: 0.968) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) (AUC: 0.966) outperform the logistic regression (AUC: 0.946) while the decision tree model was comparatively poorer (AUC: 0.783) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Internal cross-validation AUC result distribution (A) and ROC curve (B) fitted by four machine learning models for poor outcomes in children with severe adenovirus infection
Discussion
This retrospective study examined the characteristics of 66 children admitted to the PICU following severe adenovirus infection. Results indicate complications and comorbidities associated with heart failure, pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, and septic shock pose a significant mortality risk in these children. Factors associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) included decreased breath sound, ARDS, and encephalopathy. The study also utilized machine learning models to predict poor outcomes with excellent diagnostic accuracy, indicating that recognizing key clinical features may enhance clinical decision-making.
Adenovirus infection causes diseases in children throughout the year and has wide tissue tropism, affecting the respiratory, gastrointestinal, immune, and neurological systems. This makes diagnosis and treatment very complex for these children, especially those with immature immune systems [17]. Unlike other types of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), such as those caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mycoplasma pneumonia) or Staphylococcus aureus, severe adenovirus pneumonia usually presents itself with non-specific clinical symptoms, making diagnosis difficult [18, 19]. This presents a challenge in itself, along with the rapid progression to more severe stages, causing a high mortality rate and long-term sequelae; hence, identifying the risk factors of poor prognosis is essential to reduce the mortality and occurrence of severe sequelae.
Among them, the overall mortality rate of our study was 9.1%, which is higher than the mortality rate reported in other studies, such as Hao et al. (6.88%) [20] and Wang et al. (3.3%) [13]. A higher mortality rate in our cohort might be due to the severe illness among the children analyzed or a mixture of more virulent adenovirus F serotypes. Our findings, nevertheless, indicate that severe complications, for example, heart failure, ARDS, and septic shock, are key predictors of poor outcomes [21].
Mechanical ventilation, or MV, is one of the linchpins of therapy for patients with severe hypoxemia or respiratory failure. It is a life-preserving agent with risks, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, barotrauma, and hemodynamic instability [22]. MV should not in any way be implied as the one responsible for complications; actually, complications are a manifestation of the underlying severity of illness with multiple organ failure, which propels toward MV. MV is normally applied as a mode of intervention and seldom as a “poor outcome.” In this study, MV was utilized in the treatment of severe respiratory distress and some residual or overtly acute problems, including ARDS, septic shock, or encephalopathy, all of which attest to significant severity of critical illness.
The ECMO intervention has been used since the 1970s as one kind of cardiopulmonary support for critically ill patients who failed on conventional MV. ECMO has gained attention and has saved innumerable lives during the COVID-19 pandemic [23]; however, it comes with significant complications: bleeding, infection, pneumothorax, as well as higher mortality during both short- and long-term use [24, 25–27]. Even though MV and ECMO are intended to save lives, they are frequently implemented in cases already cataclysmic. This study considers the need for MV, ECMO, or death as poor outcomes that exhibit correspondence with high mortality and morbidity.
An unexpected finding in this study was the association between normal creatinine levels and the need for MV and ECMO. Creatinine is regarded as a renal biomarker, whereas elevated creatinine levels are generally correlated with kidney injury. However, in our study, normal creatinine levels were found to correlate with the recourse to MV and ECMO, hinting at a possible role for renal reserve or baseline kidney function in managing critically ill children. One explanation for this association is that normal creatinine functions more as a marker for better baseline renal function, implying better baseline organ reserve. Children with higher renal reserve might survive multi-organ failure for a more extended period. Another possibility is that creatinine is only one part of a more intricate interplay of clinical factors, and its levels may not, in all cases, reliably predict the severity of issues linked to cardiopulmonary dysfunction and organ failure, all within the context of a multi-system disease like adenovirus infection. Additional investigations are needed to analyze this association and its pertinent implications.
This study also emphasized using machine learning models to predict poor outcomes in children with severe adenovirus infection. Models were developed using clinical complications, comorbidities, and symptoms as features, achieving excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.968 for the random forest model). The current study findings build on previous studies demonstrating an application of machine learning for predicting mortality and complications in critically ill children. For example, Sánchez et al. used EEG to predict outcomes in pediatric ICU patients, with an AUC of 0.82 [28], while Kwizera A. et al. applied random forest models to predict in-hospital mortality in children with acute infections, achieving an AUC of 0.8 [29].
This is the first study to utilize machine learning models to predict poor outcomes for children with severe adenovirus infection specifically. The models developed in this study may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients earlier, enabling timely intervention and more personalized treatment plans. However, it must be noted that this model still needs to be externally validated before it can be considered for broader clinical application. External validation is essential to provide insight into the model’s generalizability and performance over clinical situations.
The authors acknowledge several limitations of this study. The small sample size might impede the generalization of the findings. The study’s event rate for poor outcomes, including mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation or ECMO, was low, which, if anything, could affect power. The data for this study were gathered from January 2018 to December 2019, and additional years of data were not collected owing to the study’s retrospective nature and the relatively rare occurrence of severe adenovirus infections in children during the study period. These limitations can be addressed with future multi-centered studies with larger sample sizes and extended durations of data collection to confirm and expand these findings.
In these multi-center cohorts, future studies should aim to prospectively validate these findings to ensure that the identified risk factors and machine learning models can be generalized. Further use of creatinine levels, renal reserve, and other biomarkers of critical illness or organ failure with adenoviral infections in children needs to be studied.
Conclusions
The study shows highly useful results that will give insight into the concrete results and risk factors of seriousness in children with severe adenoviral infections. However, there are limitations to this research. First, it is observed that severe adenoviral infections have a comparatively low incidence, and the clinical signs and symptoms can vary from person to person owing to seasonal or geographical differences. Hence, multi-center large sample studies should be performed to establish these findings with validation. Second, while machine learning models used in this study have presented predictions with reasonable accuracy, external validity is yet to be confirmed by the limited number of poor outcome cases in the cohort studied. Third, the clinical factors and the treatment preferences of the family of the child influenced the decision between MV and ECMO, thus rendering the classification of MV, ECMO, and death as poor outcomes somewhat subjective.
Future studies should focus on the prospective validation of these findings in larger cohorts and external datasets. In parallel, a more comprehensive framework must be implemented for decision-making regarding MV and ECMO, considering care’s clinical, ethical, and financial aspects.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- PICU
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
- ECMO
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- BAL
Bronchoalveolar lavage
- PCO2
Pressure of carbon dioxide
- PaO2
Partial pressure of oxygen
- SD
Standard deviation
- IQR
Interquartile range
- AUC
Area under the curve
- ROC
Receiver operating characteristic curves
- HB
Hemoglobin
- KNN
K-Nearest Neighbors
- CAP
Community-acquired pneumonia
Author contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The authors have not received any funding support.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and the National Clinical Research Center for Child Health (No.2024-IRB-0222-P-01). Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, and consent to participate was obtained from parents or guardians.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Patwary NI, Islam MS, Sohel M, Ara I, Sikder MO, Shahik SM. In silico structure analysis and epitope prediction of E3 CR1-beta protein of human adenovirus E for vaccine design. Biomed J. 2016;39(6):382–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alharbi S, Van Caeseele P, Consunji-Araneta R, Zoubeidi T, Fanella S, Souid AK, et al. Epidemiology of severe pediatric adenovirus lower respiratory tract infections in Manitoba, Canada, 1991–2005. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Biserni GB, Scarpini S, Dondi A, Biagi C, Pierantoni L, Masetti R, et al. Potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for Adenovirus respiratory infection in children and young adults. Viruses. 2021;13(9):1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fan H, Cui Y, Xu X, Zhang D, Yang D, Huang L, et al. Validation of a classification model using complete blood count to predict severe human adenovirus Lower Respiratory Tract infections in Pediatric cases. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:896606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Echavarria M. Adenoviruses in immunocompromised hosts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:704–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang J, Zhu Y, Zhou Y, Gao F, Qiu X, Li J, et al. Pediatric adenovirus pneumonia: clinical practice and current treatment. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1207568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shi T, Nie Z, Huang L, Fan H, Lu G, Yang D, et al. Mortality risk factors in children with severe influenza virus infection admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(35):e16861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dotan M, Zion E, Bilavsky E, Nahum E, Ben-Zvi H, Zalcman J, et al. Adenovirus can be a serious, life-threatening disease, even in previously healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111(3):614–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spaeder MC, Stewart C, Sharron MP, Noether JR, Martinez-Schlurman N, Kavanagh RP, et al. Adenoviral respiratory infection-Associated Mortality in children: a retrospective Case Series. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020;11(1):13–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weiss SL, Asaro LA, Flori HR, Allen GL, Wypij D, Curley MA, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction in children mechanically ventilated for Acute Respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(4):319–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Johnson RW, Ng KWP, Dietz AR, Hartman ME, Baty JD, Hasan N, et al. Muscle atrophy in mechanically-ventilated critically ill children. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0207720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.El-Nawawy A, Antonios MA, Meheissen MA, Fahim MM. Respiratory viruses associated with severe mechanically ventilated pneumonia in children. J Med Virol. 2022;94(2):461–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang X, Tan X, Li Q. The difference in clinical features and prognosis of severe adenoviral pneumonia in children of different ages. J Med Virol. 2022;94:3303–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silver L, Kaplan D, Asencio J, Mandell I, Fishbein J, Shah S. Interrater reliability of the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Criteria for Pediatric ARDS. Chest. 2023;164(3):650–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Agus MSD, Alhazzani W, Choong K, Flori HR, et al. Perspective of the surviving Sepsis campaign on the management of Pediatric Sepsis in the era of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21(11):e1031–7. 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, Breiding MJ, Haegerich TM, Gioia GA, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain Injury among children. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):e182853. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Erratum in: JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lynch JP 3rd, Kajon AE, Adenovirus. Epidemiology, global spread of Novel Serotypes, and advances in treatment and Prevention. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;37:586–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Al-Heeti OM, Cathro HP, Ison MG. Adenovirus infection and transplantation. Transplantation. 2022;106(5):920–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He Y, Liu P, Xie L, Zeng S, Lin H, Zhang B, et al. Construction and Verification of a predictive model for risk factors in children with severe Adenoviral Pneumonia. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:874822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang H, Chen Y, Ma LY, Yan MM, Deng Y, Zhang WD, et al. Analysis of the clinical features and the risk factors of severe adenovirus pneumonia in children. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021;59(1):14–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang M, Luo R, Fu Z. Risk factors for poor prognosis in children with severe adenovirus pneumonia. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017;19:159–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilson JG, Matthay MA. Mechanical ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a review of new strategies for the practicing hospitalist. J Hosp Med. 2014;9:469–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Supady A, Combes A, Barbaro RP, Camporota L, Diaz R, Fan E, et al. Respiratory indications for ECMO: focus on COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(10):1326–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thomas J, Kostousov V, Teruya J. Bleeding and thrombotic complications in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2018;44:20–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Olson SR, Murphree CR, Zonies D, Meyer AD, Mccarty OJT, Deloughery TG, et al. Thrombosis and bleeding in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) without anticoagulation: a systematic review. ASAIO J. 2021;67(3):290–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hvas CL, Christensen S, Balle CM, Munk-Andersen H, Jeppesen AN, Hvas AM. Bleeding patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have reduced platelet aggregation and plasma fibrinogen: a longitudinal observational study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):14557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arthur C, Dong Z, Abudu H, Li M, Munthali GNC, Zhang C, Zhang S, Han R, Ogbordjor S, Dormocara A, Ja L, Zhang D, Zhang H, Huangfu H. Acceptability and perception of COVID-19 vaccines among foreign medical students in China: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1112789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sanchez Fernandez I, Sansevere AJ, Gaínza-Lein M, Kapur K, Loddenkemper T. Machine learning for Outcome Prediction in Electroencephalograph (EEG)-Monitored children in the Intensive Care Unit. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(8):546–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kwizera A, Kissoon N, Musa N, Urayeneza O, Mujyarugamba P, Patterson AJ, et al. A machine learning-based Triage Tool for Children with Acute infection in a low resource setting. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(12):e524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.