Abstract
A weakly active maize Suppressor-mutator (Spm-w) element is able to heritably activate cryptic Spm elements in the maize genome. The spontaneous activation frequency, which is 1-5 X 10(-5) in the present genetic background, increases by about 100-fold in the presence of an Spm-w and remains an order of magnitude above the background level a generation after removal of the activating Spm-w. Sectorial somatic reactivation of cryptic elements can be detected phenotypically in kernels. Selection of such kernels constitutes an efficient selection for plants with reactivated Spm elements. Analysis of the reactivation process reveals that it is gradual and proceeds through genetically metastable intermediates that exhibit different patterns of element expression during plant development. Newly reactivated elements tend to return to an inactive form. However, the probability that an element will remain in a heritably active state increases when the element is maintained in the presence of an active Spm element for several generations.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Banks J. A., Masson P., Fedoroff N. Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1364–1380. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burr B., Burr F. A. Activation of silent transposable elements. Basic Life Sci. 1988;47:317–323. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5550-2_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandler V. L., Walbot V. DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1767–1771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chomet P. S., Wessler S., Dellaporta S. L. Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO J. 1987 Feb;6(2):295–302. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04753.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fedoroff N. V., Banks J. A. Is the Suppressor-mutator element controlled by a basic developmental regulatory mechanism? Genetics. 1988 Oct;120(2):559–577. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.2.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowler R. G., Peterson P. A. An altered state of a specific en regulatory element induced in a maize tiller. Genetics. 1978 Dec;90(4):761–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.4.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masson P., Surosky R., Kingsbury J. A., Fedoroff N. V. Genetic and molecular analysis of the Spm-dependent a-m2 alleles of the maize a locus. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):117–137. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuffer M. G. Stability of the suppressor element in two mutator systems at the a(1) locus in maize. Genetics. 1966 Mar;53(3):541–549. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peschke V. M., Phillips R. L., Gengenbach B. G. Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture--derived maize plants. Science. 1987 Nov 6;238(4828):804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4828.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson P. A. Phase variation of regulatory elements in maize. Genetics. 1966 Jul;54(1):249–266. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.1.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sprague G. F., McKinney H. H. Further evidence on the genetic behavior of ar in maize. Genetics. 1971 Apr;67(4):533–542. doi: 10.1093/genetics/67.4.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]