Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Apr;121(4):739–750. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.739

On the Components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila Melanogaster. IV. Construction and Analysis of Free Duplications for the Responder Locus

J G Brittnacher 1, B Ganetzky 1
PMCID: PMC1203657  PMID: 2498160

Abstract

Male Drosophila heterozygous for an SD-bearing second chromosome and a normal homolog preferentially transmit the SD chromosome to their offspring. The distorted transmission involves the induced dysfunction of the sperm that receive the SD(+) chromosome. The loci on the SD chromosome responsible for causing distortion are the Sd locus the the E(SD) locus. Their target of action on the SD(+) chromosome is the Rsp(s) locus. Previous studies of Rsp(s) indicated that deletion of this locus rendered a chromosome insensitive to the action of SD and mapped Rsp(s) physically within the centric heterochromatin of 2R. In this study we have constructed a collection of marked free duplications for the centromeric region of a second chromosome that carried Rsp(s). The heterochromatic extent of each duplication as well as its sensitivity to distortion was determined. We found that Rsp(s) is the most proximal known locus within the 2R heterochromatin. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the presence of Rsp(s) is not only necessary but sufficient to confer sensitivity to distortion irrespective of its association with an intact second chromosome or one that pairs meiotically with an SD chromosome. By use of these duplications we increased the usual dosage of Rsp(s) relative to SD to determine whether there was any competition for limited amounts of SD [and/or E(SD)] product. When two Rsp(s)-bearing chromosomes are present within the same spermatocyte nucleus an SD chromosome is capable of causing efficient distortion of both. However, at least in some cases the degree of distortion against a given Rsp(s) was reduced by the presence of an extra dose of Rsp(s) indicating that there was some competition between them. The bearing of these results on present models of segregation distortion are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brittnacher J. G., Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Nature of enhancer of SD. Genetics. 1984 Jul;107(3):423–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis B. K. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;113(3):251–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00339546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):321–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hartl D. L. Genetic dissection of segregation distortion. I. Suicide combinations of SD genes. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):477–486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.3.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartl D. L., Hiraizumi Y., Crow J. F. Evidence for sperm dysfunction as the mechanism of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Dec;58(6):2240–2245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.6.2240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hilliker A. J. Genetic analysis of the centromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster: deficiency mapping of EMS-induced lethal complementation groups. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):765–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.4.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hiraizumi Y., Martin D. W., Eckstrand I. A. A Modified Model of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1980 Jul;95(3):693–706. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kettaneh N. P., Hartl D. L. Ultrastructural analysis of spermiogenesis in segregation distorter males of Drosophila melanogaster: the homozygotes. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):665–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindsley D. L., Sandler L., Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Denell R. E., Hall J. C., Jacobs P. A., Miklos G. L., Davis B. K., Gethmann R. C. Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):157–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyttle T. W. Additive Effects of Multiple SEGREGATION DISTORTER ( SD) Chromosomes on Sperm Dysfunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):203–216. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyttle T. W., Brittnacher J. G., Ganetzky B. Detection of Rsp and modifier variation in the meiotic drive system Segregation distorter (SD) of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):183–202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyttle T. W. Experimental Population Genetics of Meiotic Drive Systems II. Accumulation of Genetic Modifiers of Segregation Distorter (SD) in Laboratory Populations. Genetics. 1979 Feb;91(2):339–357. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lyttle T. W. The effect of novel chromosome position and variable dose on the genetic behavior of the Responder (Rsp) element of the Segregation distorter (SD) system of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):751–763. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miklos G. L. An investigation of the components of Segregation-Distorter systems in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Mar;70(3):405–418. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.3.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miklos G. L., Smith-White S. An analysis of the instability of segregation-distorter in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1971 Feb;67(2):305–317. doi: 10.1093/genetics/67.2.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Novitski E., Grace D., Strommen C. The entire compound autosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1981 Jun;98(2):257–273. doi: 10.1093/genetics/98.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pimpinelli S., Dimitri P. Cytogenetic analysis of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster: the cytological organization of the Responder (Rsp) locus. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):765–772. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Temin R. G., Marthas M. Factors Influencing the Effect of Segregation Distortion in Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1984 Jul;107(3):375–393. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tokuyasu K. T., Peacock W. J., Hardy R. W. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Effects of segregation distorter (SD) chromosome. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977 Jan;58(1):96–107. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(77)80011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu C. I., Lyttle T. W., Wu M. L., Lin G. F. Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the Responder of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster. Cell. 1988 Jul 15;54(2):179–189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90550-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES