Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 May;122(1):193–203. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.193

The Impact of Maternal Uterine Genotype on Postnatal Growth and Adult Body Size in Mice

D E Cowley 1, D Pomp 1, W R Atchley 1, E J Eisen 1, D Hawkins-Brown 1
PMCID: PMC1203684  PMID: 2731729

Abstract

Embryo transfers were used to demonstrate that the genotype of the mother providing the uterine developmental environment significantly influences postnatal growth and adult body size of her progeny. Irrespective of their own genotype, mouse embryos transferred into the uterus of an inbred strain with large body size (C3H) had greater body weights, longer tails and higher growth rates than those transferred into the uterus of a strain with small body size (SWR). Uterine heterosis on body size was smaller than progeny heterosis, and both progeny and uterine heterosis persisted in adult mice. Uterine litter size was significantly negatively associated with body weight, tail length, growth rate and the timing of developmental events. The inbred SWR strain was more sensitive to the embryo transfer procedure than the C3H strain, but effects due to embryo transfer were moderate. Prenatal uterine effects have ramifications for biotechnologies utilizing embryo transfers as well as predictions about evolutionary change by selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Al-Murrani W. K., Roberts R. C. Maternal effects on body weight in mice selected for large and small size. Genet Res. 1978 Nov;32(3):295–302. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300018796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FALCONER D. S. The genetics of litter size in mice. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Nov;56(Suppl 1):153–167. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030560414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FINN C. A. INFLUENCE OF THE MALE ON LITTER SIZE IN MICE. J Reprod Fertil. 1964 Feb;7:107–111. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0070107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferris S. D., Sage R. D., Prager E. M., Ritte U., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA evolution in mice. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):681–721. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finkel S. I., Lilly F. Influence of histoincompatibility between mother and foetus on placental size in mice. Nature. 1971 Nov 12;234(5324):102–103. doi: 10.1038/234102a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton B. L., Hamilton A., Hamilton M. S. Maternal-fetal disparity at multiple minor histocompatibility loci affects the weight of the feto-placental unit in mice. J Reprod Immunol. 1985 Nov;8(2-3):257–261. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(85)90045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hedrick P. W. HLA-sharing, recurrent spontaneous abortion, and the genetic hypothesis. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):199–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hedrick P. W., Thomson G. Maternal-fetal interactions and the maintenance of HLA polymorphism. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):205–212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iida K., Mizuma Y., Nagai J. Heterosis in survival of transferred mouse embryos. Z Versuchstierkd. 1987;30(3-4):99–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirkpatrick B. W., Arias J. A., Rutledge J. J. Effects of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on long-term reproduction in mice. J Anim Sci. 1988 Jan;66(1):62–69. doi: 10.2527/jas1988.66162x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirkpatrick B. W., Rutledge J. J. The influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in mice. Biol Reprod. 1987 May;36(4):907–914. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod36.4.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore R. W., Eisen E. J., Ulberg L. C. Prenatal and postnatal maternal influences on growth in mice selected for body weight. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):59–68. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Petters R. M., Eisen E. J., Pomp D., Lucy M. C. Cytoplasmic effects on selection response for increased growth rate in mice. J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):287–292. doi: 10.2527/jas1988.662287x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rutledge J. J., Robison O. W., Eisen E. J., Legates J. E. Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice. J Anim Sci. 1972 Nov;35(5):911–918. doi: 10.2527/jas1972.355911x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Willham R. L. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. 3. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J Anim Sci. 1972 Dec;35(6):1288–1293. doi: 10.2527/jas1972.3561288x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. el-Oksh H. A., Sutherland T. M., Williams J. S. Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice. Genetics. 1967 Sep;57(1):79–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES