Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 May;122(1):223–234. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.223

Multivariate Mutation-Selection Balance with Constrained Pleiotropic Effects

G P Wagner 1
PMCID: PMC1203687  PMID: 2731730

Abstract

A multivariate quantitative genetic model is analyzed that is based on the assumption that the genetic variation at a locus j primarily influences an underlying physiological variable y(j), while influence on the genotypic values is determined by a kind of ``developmental function'' which is not changed by mutations at this locus. Assuming additivity among loci the developmental function becomes a linear transformation of the underlying variables y onto the genotypic values x, x = By. In this way the pleiotropic effects become constrained by the structure of the B-matrix. The equilibrium variance under mutation-stabilizing selection balance in infinite and finite populations is derived by using the house of cards approximation. The results are compared to the predictions given by M. Turelli in 1985 for pleiotropic two-character models. It is shown that the B-matrix model gives the same results as Turelli's five-allele model, suggesting that the crucial factor determining the equilibrium variance in multivariate models with pleiotropy is the assumption about constraints on the pleiotropic effects, and not the number of alleles as proposed by Turelli. Finally it is shown that under Gaussian stabilizing selection the structure of the B-matrix has effectively no influence on the mean equilibrium fitness of an infinite population. Hence the B-matrix and consequently to some extent also the structure of the genetic correlation matrix is an almost neutral character. The consequences for the evolution of genetic covariance matrices are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H., Turelli M. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):157–173. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bulmer M. G. The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study. Genet Res. 1976 Oct;28(2):101–117. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulmer M. G. The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation and drift. Genet Res. 1972 Feb;19(1):17–25. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bürger R. Linkage and the maintenance of heritable variation by mutation-selection balance. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):175–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bürger R. On the maintenance of genetic variation: global analysis of Kimura's continuum-of-alleles model. J Math Biol. 1986;24(3):341–351. doi: 10.1007/BF00275642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheverud J. M. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J Theor Biol. 1984 Sep 21;110(2):155–171. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet Res. 1988 Aug;52(1):33–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Sep;54(3):731–736. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.3.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lande R. The Genetic Covariance between Characters Maintained by Pleiotropic Mutations. Genetics. 1980 Jan;94(1):203–215. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nüsslein-Volhard C., Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980 Oct 30;287(5785):795–801. doi: 10.1038/287795a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohta T., Kimura M. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res. 1973 Oct;22(2):201–204. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson J. N., Jr Quantitative variation and gene number. Nature. 1975 Dec 25;258(5537):665–668. doi: 10.1038/258665a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Turelli M. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Apr;25(2):138–193. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagner G. P., Bürger R. On the evolution of dominance modifiers II: a non-equilibrium approach to the evolution of genetic systems. J Theor Biol. 1985 Apr 7;113(3):475–500. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(85)80034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES