Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Jul;122(3):535–542. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.535

Disruption of the Rad52 Gene Alters the Spectrum of Spontaneous Sup4-O Mutations in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

B A Kunz 1, M G Peters 1, S E Kohalmi 1, J D Armstrong 1, M Glattke 1, K Badiani 1
PMCID: PMC1203727  PMID: 2668115

Abstract

Defects in the RAD52 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae confer a mutator phenotype. To characterize this effect in detail, a collection of 238 spontaneous SUP4-o mutations arising in a strain having a disrupted RAD52 gene was analyzed by DNA sequencing. The resulting mutational spectrum was compared to that derived from an examination of 222 spontaneous mutations selected in a near-isogenic wild-type (RAD52) strain. This comparison revealed that the mutator phenotype was associated with an increase in the frequency of base-pair substitutions. All possible types of substitution were detected but there was a reduction in the relative fraction of A·T -> G·C transitions and an increase in the proportion of G·C -> C·G transversions. These changes were sufficient to cause a twofold greater preference for substitutions at G·C sites in the rad52 strain despite a decrease in the fraction of G·C -> T·A transversions. There were also considerable differences between the distributions of substitutions within the SUP4-o gene. Base-pair changes occurred at fewer sites in the rad52 strain but the mutated sites included several that were not detected in the RAD52 background. Only two of the four sites that were mutated most frequently in the rad52 strain were also prominent in the wild-type strain and mutation frequencies at almost all sites common to both strains were greater for the rad52 derivative. Although single base-pair deletions occurred in the two strains with similar frequencies, several classes of mutation that were recovered in the wild-type background including multiple base-pair deletions, insertions of the yeast transposable element Ty, and more complex changes, were not detected in the rad52 strain. These results are discussed in relation to possible mechanisms that might account for the rad52 mutator effect.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (898.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birnboim H. C., Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calos M. P., Miller J. H. Transposable elements. Cell. 1980 Jul;20(3):579–595. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90305-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen D. S., Bernstein H. Yeast gene RAD52 can substitute for phage T4 gene 46 or 47 in carrying out recombination and DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(18):6821–6825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chow T. Y., Resnick M. A. An endo-exonuclease activity of yeast that requires a functional RAD52 gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Jan;211(1):41–48. doi: 10.1007/BF00338391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox E. C. Bacterial mutator genes and the control of spontaneous mutation. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:135–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crouse G. F., Frischauf A., Lehrach H. An integrated and simplified approach to cloning into plasmids and single-stranded phages. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:78–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedberg E. C. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):70–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.70-102.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giroux C. N., Mis J. R., Pierce M. K., Kohalmi S. E., Kunz B. A. DNA sequence analysis of spontaneous mutations in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):978–981. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Golding G. B., Glickman B. W. Sequence-directed mutagenesis: evidence from a phylogenetic history of human alpha-interferon genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8577–8581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hastings P. J., Quah S. K., von Borstel R. C. Spontaneous mutation by mutagenic repair of spontaneous lesions in DNA. Nature. 1976 Dec 23;264(5588):719–722. doi: 10.1038/264719a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson A. W., Demple B. Yeast DNA 3'-repair diesterase is the major cellular apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease: substrate specificity and kinetics. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 5;263(34):18017–18022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson A. W., Demple B. Yeast DNA diesterase for 3'-fragments of deoxyribose: purification and physical properties of a repair enzyme for oxidative DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 5;263(34):18009–18016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kern R., Zimmermann F. K. The influence of defects in excision and error prone repair on spontaneous and induced mitotic recombination and mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Apr 25;161(1):81–88. doi: 10.1007/BF00266618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knapp G., Beckmann J. S., Johnson P. F., Fuhrman S. A., Abelson J. Transcription and processing of intervening sequences in yeast tRNA genes. Cell. 1978 Jun;14(2):221–236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90109-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohalmi S. E., Kunz B. A. Role of neighbouring bases and assessment of strand specificity in ethylmethanesulphonate and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1988 Dec 5;204(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90355-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunz B. A., Eckardt F., Haynes R. H. Analysis of non-linearities in frequency curves for UV-induced mitotic recombination in wild-type and excision-repair-deficient strains of yeast. Mutat Res. 1985 Sep;151(2):235–242. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(85)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kunz B. A., Pierce M. K., Mis J. R., Giroux C. N. DNA sequence analysis of the mutational specificity of u.v. light in the SUP4-o gene of yeast. Mutagenesis. 1987 Nov;2(6):445–453. doi: 10.1093/mutage/2.6.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leong P. M., Hsia H. C., Miller J. H. Analysis of spontaneous base substitutions generated in mismatch-repair-deficient strains of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986 Oct;168(1):412–416. doi: 10.1128/jb.168.1.412-416.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Loeb L. A., Kunkel T. A. Fidelity of DNA synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:429–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Loeb L. A., Preston B. D. Mutagenesis by apurinic/apyrimidinic sites. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:201–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.001221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maloney D. H., Fogel S. Mitotic recombination in yeast: isolation and characterization of mutants with enhanced spontaneous mitotic gene conversion rates. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):825–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mortimer R. K., Contopoulou R., Schild D. Mitotic chromosome loss in a radiation-sensitive strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5778–5782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moustacchi E. Cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic events induced by UV light in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with different UV sensitivities. Mutat Res. 1969 Mar-Apr;7(2):171–185. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Perera J. R., Glasunov A. V., Glaser V. M., Boreiko A. V. Repair of double-strand breaks in plasmid DNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Aug;213(2-3):421–424. doi: 10.1007/BF00339611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pierce M. K., Giroux C. N., Kunz B. A. Development of a yeast system to assay mutational specificity. Mutat Res. 1987 Apr;182(2):65–74. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(87)90055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Prakash L. Effect of Genes Controlling Radiation Sensitivity on Chemically Induced Mutations in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. Genetics. 1976 Jun;83(2):285–301. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.2.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Quah S. K., von Borstel R. C., Hastings P. J. The origin of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1980 Dec;96(4):819–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.4.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Randall S. K., Eritja R., Kaplan B. E., Petruska J., Goodman M. F. Nucleotide insertion kinetics opposite abasic lesions in DNA. J Biol Chem. 1987 May 15;262(14):6864–6870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ripley L. S., Glickman B. W. Unique self-complementarity of palindromic sequences provides DNA structural intermediates for mutation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):851–861. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Roberts J. D., Kunkel T. A. Mutational specificity of animal cell DNA polymerases. Environ Mutagen. 1986;8(5):769–789. doi: 10.1002/em.2860080511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rudin N., Haber J. E. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3918–3928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sargentini N. J., Smith K. C. Spontaneous mutagenesis: the roles of DNA repair, replication, and recombination. Mutat Res. 1985 Jul;154(1):1–27. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schaaper R. M., Dunn R. L. Spectra of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli strains defective in mismatch correction: the nature of in vivo DNA replication errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6220–6224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Scherer S., Mann C., Davis R. W. Reversion of a promoter deletion in yeast. Nature. 1982 Aug 26;298(5877):815–819. doi: 10.1038/298815a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Von Borstel R. C., Cain K. T., Steinberg C. M. Inheritance of spontaneous mutability in yeast. Genetics. 1971 Sep;69(1):17–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES